Performance evaluation of GNSS-TEC estimation techniques at the grid point in middle and low latitudes during different geomagnetic conditions
Global Navigation Satellite Systems (GNSS) have become a powerful tool use in surveying and mapping, air and maritime navigation, ionospheric/space weather research and other applications. However, in some cases, its maximum efficiency could not be attained due to some uncorrelated errors associated...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of geodesy 2017-04, Vol.91 (4), p.409-417 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 417 |
---|---|
container_issue | 4 |
container_start_page | 409 |
container_title | Journal of geodesy |
container_volume | 91 |
creator | Abe, O. E. Otero Villamide, X. Paparini, C. Radicella, S. M. Nava, B. Rodríguez-Bouza, M. |
description | Global Navigation Satellite Systems (GNSS) have become a powerful tool use in surveying and mapping, air and maritime navigation, ionospheric/space weather research and other applications. However, in some cases, its maximum efficiency could not be attained due to some uncorrelated errors associated with the system measurements, which is caused mainly by the dispersive nature of the ionosphere. Ionosphere has been represented using the total number of electrons along the signal path at a particular height known as Total Electron Content (TEC). However, there are many methods to estimate TEC but the outputs are not uniform, which could be due to the peculiarity in characterizing the biases inside the observables (measurements), and sometimes could be associated to the influence of mapping function. The errors in TEC estimation could lead to wrong conclusion and this could be more critical in case of safety-of-life application. This work investigated the performance of Ciraolo’s and Gopi’s GNSS-TEC calibration techniques, during 5 geomagnetic quiet and disturbed conditions in the month of October 2013, at the grid points located in low and middle latitudes. The data used are obtained from the GNSS ground-based receivers located at Borriana in Spain (40
∘
N, 0
∘
E; mid latitude) and Accra in Ghana (5.50
∘
N, −0.20
∘
E; low latitude). The results of the calibrated TEC are compared with the TEC obtained from European Geostationary Navigation Overlay System Processing Set (EGNOS PS) TEC algorithm, which is considered as a reference data. The TEC derived from Global Ionospheric Maps (GIM) through International GNSS service (IGS) was also examined at the same grid points. The results obtained in this work showed that Ciraolo’s calibration technique (a calibration technique based on carrier-phase measurements only) estimates TEC better at middle latitude in comparison to Gopi’s technique (a calibration technique based on code and carrier-phase measurements). At the same time, Gopi’s calibration was also found more reliable in low latitude than Ciraolo’s technique. In addition, the TEC derived from IGS GIM seems to be much reliable in middle-latitude than in low-latitude region. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1007/s00190-016-0972-z |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1881760522</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1881760522</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c349t-6077023569166358b77599b99cf63817126a7e09cc8cc62cc949ffe3b651131e3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kc9qFTEUxoMoeG37AO4CbtxEcyYzyWQpl1qFooW265CbOXObMpNck4xiH8JnNsO4EMHVgcPv-86fj5DXwN8B5-p95hw0Zxwk41o17OkZ2UErGgZCt8_JjutWM6WgfUle5fxYadX1ckd-3WAaY5ptcEjxu50WW3wMNI706svtLbu73FPMxc9bu6B7CP7bgpnaQssD0mPyAz1FHwr1gc5-GCakNgx0ij_oVFVlGSo9LMmHIx38OGLCCh8xzvYYsHhHXQyDX_3zOXkx2injxZ96Ru4_Xt7tP7Hrr1ef9x-umROtLkxypXgjOqlBStH1B6U6rQ9au1GKHhQ00irk2rneOdk4V6-vg8VBdgACUJyRt5vvKcX1mmJmnx1Okw0Yl2ygry6Sd01T0Tf_oI9xSaFuVynV8w6EVJWCjXIp5pxwNKdUn5Z-GuBmTchsCZmakFkTMk9V02yafFqfg-kv5_-KfgMw7pTz</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1878051367</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Performance evaluation of GNSS-TEC estimation techniques at the grid point in middle and low latitudes during different geomagnetic conditions</title><source>Springer Nature - Complete Springer Journals</source><creator>Abe, O. E. ; Otero Villamide, X. ; Paparini, C. ; Radicella, S. M. ; Nava, B. ; Rodríguez-Bouza, M.</creator><creatorcontrib>Abe, O. E. ; Otero Villamide, X. ; Paparini, C. ; Radicella, S. M. ; Nava, B. ; Rodríguez-Bouza, M.</creatorcontrib><description>Global Navigation Satellite Systems (GNSS) have become a powerful tool use in surveying and mapping, air and maritime navigation, ionospheric/space weather research and other applications. However, in some cases, its maximum efficiency could not be attained due to some uncorrelated errors associated with the system measurements, which is caused mainly by the dispersive nature of the ionosphere. Ionosphere has been represented using the total number of electrons along the signal path at a particular height known as Total Electron Content (TEC). However, there are many methods to estimate TEC but the outputs are not uniform, which could be due to the peculiarity in characterizing the biases inside the observables (measurements), and sometimes could be associated to the influence of mapping function. The errors in TEC estimation could lead to wrong conclusion and this could be more critical in case of safety-of-life application. This work investigated the performance of Ciraolo’s and Gopi’s GNSS-TEC calibration techniques, during 5 geomagnetic quiet and disturbed conditions in the month of October 2013, at the grid points located in low and middle latitudes. The data used are obtained from the GNSS ground-based receivers located at Borriana in Spain (40
∘
N, 0
∘
E; mid latitude) and Accra in Ghana (5.50
∘
N, −0.20
∘
E; low latitude). The results of the calibrated TEC are compared with the TEC obtained from European Geostationary Navigation Overlay System Processing Set (EGNOS PS) TEC algorithm, which is considered as a reference data. The TEC derived from Global Ionospheric Maps (GIM) through International GNSS service (IGS) was also examined at the same grid points. The results obtained in this work showed that Ciraolo’s calibration technique (a calibration technique based on carrier-phase measurements only) estimates TEC better at middle latitude in comparison to Gopi’s technique (a calibration technique based on code and carrier-phase measurements). At the same time, Gopi’s calibration was also found more reliable in low latitude than Ciraolo’s technique. In addition, the TEC derived from IGS GIM seems to be much reliable in middle-latitude than in low-latitude region.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0949-7714</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1432-1394</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s00190-016-0972-z</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Berlin/Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg</publisher><subject>Calibration ; Earth and Environmental Science ; Earth Sciences ; Geodetics ; Geophysics/Geodesy ; Global positioning systems ; GPS ; Ionosphere ; Latitude ; Magnetic fields ; Original Article ; Performance evaluation</subject><ispartof>Journal of geodesy, 2017-04, Vol.91 (4), p.409-417</ispartof><rights>Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2016</rights><rights>Journal of Geodesy is a copyright of Springer, 2017.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c349t-6077023569166358b77599b99cf63817126a7e09cc8cc62cc949ffe3b651131e3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c349t-6077023569166358b77599b99cf63817126a7e09cc8cc62cc949ffe3b651131e3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s00190-016-0972-z$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1007/s00190-016-0972-z$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925,41488,42557,51319</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Abe, O. E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Otero Villamide, X.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Paparini, C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Radicella, S. M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nava, B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rodríguez-Bouza, M.</creatorcontrib><title>Performance evaluation of GNSS-TEC estimation techniques at the grid point in middle and low latitudes during different geomagnetic conditions</title><title>Journal of geodesy</title><addtitle>J Geod</addtitle><description>Global Navigation Satellite Systems (GNSS) have become a powerful tool use in surveying and mapping, air and maritime navigation, ionospheric/space weather research and other applications. However, in some cases, its maximum efficiency could not be attained due to some uncorrelated errors associated with the system measurements, which is caused mainly by the dispersive nature of the ionosphere. Ionosphere has been represented using the total number of electrons along the signal path at a particular height known as Total Electron Content (TEC). However, there are many methods to estimate TEC but the outputs are not uniform, which could be due to the peculiarity in characterizing the biases inside the observables (measurements), and sometimes could be associated to the influence of mapping function. The errors in TEC estimation could lead to wrong conclusion and this could be more critical in case of safety-of-life application. This work investigated the performance of Ciraolo’s and Gopi’s GNSS-TEC calibration techniques, during 5 geomagnetic quiet and disturbed conditions in the month of October 2013, at the grid points located in low and middle latitudes. The data used are obtained from the GNSS ground-based receivers located at Borriana in Spain (40
∘
N, 0
∘
E; mid latitude) and Accra in Ghana (5.50
∘
N, −0.20
∘
E; low latitude). The results of the calibrated TEC are compared with the TEC obtained from European Geostationary Navigation Overlay System Processing Set (EGNOS PS) TEC algorithm, which is considered as a reference data. The TEC derived from Global Ionospheric Maps (GIM) through International GNSS service (IGS) was also examined at the same grid points. The results obtained in this work showed that Ciraolo’s calibration technique (a calibration technique based on carrier-phase measurements only) estimates TEC better at middle latitude in comparison to Gopi’s technique (a calibration technique based on code and carrier-phase measurements). At the same time, Gopi’s calibration was also found more reliable in low latitude than Ciraolo’s technique. In addition, the TEC derived from IGS GIM seems to be much reliable in middle-latitude than in low-latitude region.</description><subject>Calibration</subject><subject>Earth and Environmental Science</subject><subject>Earth Sciences</subject><subject>Geodetics</subject><subject>Geophysics/Geodesy</subject><subject>Global positioning systems</subject><subject>GPS</subject><subject>Ionosphere</subject><subject>Latitude</subject><subject>Magnetic fields</subject><subject>Original Article</subject><subject>Performance evaluation</subject><issn>0949-7714</issn><issn>1432-1394</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2017</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kc9qFTEUxoMoeG37AO4CbtxEcyYzyWQpl1qFooW265CbOXObMpNck4xiH8JnNsO4EMHVgcPv-86fj5DXwN8B5-p95hw0Zxwk41o17OkZ2UErGgZCt8_JjutWM6WgfUle5fxYadX1ckd-3WAaY5ptcEjxu50WW3wMNI706svtLbu73FPMxc9bu6B7CP7bgpnaQssD0mPyAz1FHwr1gc5-GCakNgx0ij_oVFVlGSo9LMmHIx38OGLCCh8xzvYYsHhHXQyDX_3zOXkx2injxZ96Ru4_Xt7tP7Hrr1ef9x-umROtLkxypXgjOqlBStH1B6U6rQ9au1GKHhQ00irk2rneOdk4V6-vg8VBdgACUJyRt5vvKcX1mmJmnx1Okw0Yl2ygry6Sd01T0Tf_oI9xSaFuVynV8w6EVJWCjXIp5pxwNKdUn5Z-GuBmTchsCZmakFkTMk9V02yafFqfg-kv5_-KfgMw7pTz</recordid><startdate>20170401</startdate><enddate>20170401</enddate><creator>Abe, O. E.</creator><creator>Otero Villamide, X.</creator><creator>Paparini, C.</creator><creator>Radicella, S. M.</creator><creator>Nava, B.</creator><creator>Rodríguez-Bouza, M.</creator><general>Springer Berlin Heidelberg</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7TG</scope><scope>7TN</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88I</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>BKSAR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>H96</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>KL.</scope><scope>L.G</scope><scope>M2P</scope><scope>PCBAR</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>Q9U</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20170401</creationdate><title>Performance evaluation of GNSS-TEC estimation techniques at the grid point in middle and low latitudes during different geomagnetic conditions</title><author>Abe, O. E. ; Otero Villamide, X. ; Paparini, C. ; Radicella, S. M. ; Nava, B. ; Rodríguez-Bouza, M.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c349t-6077023569166358b77599b99cf63817126a7e09cc8cc62cc949ffe3b651131e3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2017</creationdate><topic>Calibration</topic><topic>Earth and Environmental Science</topic><topic>Earth Sciences</topic><topic>Geodetics</topic><topic>Geophysics/Geodesy</topic><topic>Global positioning systems</topic><topic>GPS</topic><topic>Ionosphere</topic><topic>Latitude</topic><topic>Magnetic fields</topic><topic>Original Article</topic><topic>Performance evaluation</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Abe, O. E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Otero Villamide, X.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Paparini, C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Radicella, S. M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nava, B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rodríguez-Bouza, M.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Meteorological & Geoastrophysical Abstracts</collection><collection>Oceanic Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Earth, Atmospheric & Aquatic Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 2: Ocean Technology, Policy & Non-Living Resources</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>Meteorological & Geoastrophysical Abstracts - Academic</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><collection>Science Database</collection><collection>Earth, Atmospheric & Aquatic Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><jtitle>Journal of geodesy</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Abe, O. E.</au><au>Otero Villamide, X.</au><au>Paparini, C.</au><au>Radicella, S. M.</au><au>Nava, B.</au><au>Rodríguez-Bouza, M.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Performance evaluation of GNSS-TEC estimation techniques at the grid point in middle and low latitudes during different geomagnetic conditions</atitle><jtitle>Journal of geodesy</jtitle><stitle>J Geod</stitle><date>2017-04-01</date><risdate>2017</risdate><volume>91</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>409</spage><epage>417</epage><pages>409-417</pages><issn>0949-7714</issn><eissn>1432-1394</eissn><abstract>Global Navigation Satellite Systems (GNSS) have become a powerful tool use in surveying and mapping, air and maritime navigation, ionospheric/space weather research and other applications. However, in some cases, its maximum efficiency could not be attained due to some uncorrelated errors associated with the system measurements, which is caused mainly by the dispersive nature of the ionosphere. Ionosphere has been represented using the total number of electrons along the signal path at a particular height known as Total Electron Content (TEC). However, there are many methods to estimate TEC but the outputs are not uniform, which could be due to the peculiarity in characterizing the biases inside the observables (measurements), and sometimes could be associated to the influence of mapping function. The errors in TEC estimation could lead to wrong conclusion and this could be more critical in case of safety-of-life application. This work investigated the performance of Ciraolo’s and Gopi’s GNSS-TEC calibration techniques, during 5 geomagnetic quiet and disturbed conditions in the month of October 2013, at the grid points located in low and middle latitudes. The data used are obtained from the GNSS ground-based receivers located at Borriana in Spain (40
∘
N, 0
∘
E; mid latitude) and Accra in Ghana (5.50
∘
N, −0.20
∘
E; low latitude). The results of the calibrated TEC are compared with the TEC obtained from European Geostationary Navigation Overlay System Processing Set (EGNOS PS) TEC algorithm, which is considered as a reference data. The TEC derived from Global Ionospheric Maps (GIM) through International GNSS service (IGS) was also examined at the same grid points. The results obtained in this work showed that Ciraolo’s calibration technique (a calibration technique based on carrier-phase measurements only) estimates TEC better at middle latitude in comparison to Gopi’s technique (a calibration technique based on code and carrier-phase measurements). At the same time, Gopi’s calibration was also found more reliable in low latitude than Ciraolo’s technique. In addition, the TEC derived from IGS GIM seems to be much reliable in middle-latitude than in low-latitude region.</abstract><cop>Berlin/Heidelberg</cop><pub>Springer Berlin Heidelberg</pub><doi>10.1007/s00190-016-0972-z</doi><tpages>9</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0949-7714 |
ispartof | Journal of geodesy, 2017-04, Vol.91 (4), p.409-417 |
issn | 0949-7714 1432-1394 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1881760522 |
source | Springer Nature - Complete Springer Journals |
subjects | Calibration Earth and Environmental Science Earth Sciences Geodetics Geophysics/Geodesy Global positioning systems GPS Ionosphere Latitude Magnetic fields Original Article Performance evaluation |
title | Performance evaluation of GNSS-TEC estimation techniques at the grid point in middle and low latitudes during different geomagnetic conditions |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-03T19%3A36%3A28IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Performance%20evaluation%20of%20GNSS-TEC%20estimation%20techniques%20at%20the%20grid%20point%20in%20middle%20and%20low%20latitudes%20during%20different%20geomagnetic%20conditions&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20geodesy&rft.au=Abe,%20O.%20E.&rft.date=2017-04-01&rft.volume=91&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=409&rft.epage=417&rft.pages=409-417&rft.issn=0949-7714&rft.eissn=1432-1394&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s00190-016-0972-z&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1881760522%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1878051367&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |