Rebound Effect or Induced Demand? Analyzing the Compound Dual Effects on VMT in the U.S

This research explored the dual influence of fuel efficiency and roadway capacity on vehicle distance traveled. The empirical study was conducted by applying a generalized least square (GLS) analysis to the U.S. state-level panel data of fuel efficiency, roadway lane-miles, and vehicle miles travele...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Sustainability 2017, Vol.9 (2), p.219-219
Hauptverfasser: Byun, Jihye, Park, Sungjin, Jang, Kitae
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 219
container_issue 2
container_start_page 219
container_title Sustainability
container_volume 9
creator Byun, Jihye
Park, Sungjin
Jang, Kitae
description This research explored the dual influence of fuel efficiency and roadway capacity on vehicle distance traveled. The empirical study was conducted by applying a generalized least square (GLS) analysis to the U.S. state-level panel data of fuel efficiency, roadway lane-miles, and vehicle miles traveled (VMT) for over three decades (1980-2010). The analysis confirmed the co-existence of rebound effect and induced demand on driving distances over the decades-improved fuel efficiency and expanded roadway capacity caused additional vehicle distance traveled, partially offsetting the benefits of the measures taken. Furthermore, the results showed that the magnitude of each effect would be unjustifiably overestimated if this dual influence was not taken into consideration.
doi_str_mv 10.3390/su9020219
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1881759168</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>4320950165</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2409-f6ffc91cd96e65a9940671a786ac45dc689fdc2b0bba1124d9e5587403929f393</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpdkEtLAzEUhYMoWGoX_oOAG11MzU0yj6yktFULFUFbXQ6ZPHTKTFInnUX99U4fiHg29yy-c-EchC6BDBkT5Da0glBCQZygHiUpREBicvrHn6NBCCvSiTEQkPTQ-4spfOs0nlpr1Ab7Bs-cbpXReGJq6fQdHjlZbb9L94E3nwaPfb3eByatrI6pgL3Db08LXLo9sxy-XqAzK6tgBsfbR8v76WL8GM2fH2bj0TxSlBMR2cRaJUBpkZgklkJwkqQg0yyRisdaJZmwWtGCFIUEoFwLE8dZygkTVFgmWB9dH_6uG__VmrDJ6zIoU1XSGd-GHLIM0rirmnXo1T905dumK7ej0owDMJ521M2BUo0PoTE2XzdlLZttDiTfrZz_rsx-AEuZa7g</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1878411347</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Rebound Effect or Induced Demand? Analyzing the Compound Dual Effects on VMT in the U.S</title><source>MDPI - Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><creator>Byun, Jihye ; Park, Sungjin ; Jang, Kitae</creator><creatorcontrib>Byun, Jihye ; Park, Sungjin ; Jang, Kitae</creatorcontrib><description>This research explored the dual influence of fuel efficiency and roadway capacity on vehicle distance traveled. The empirical study was conducted by applying a generalized least square (GLS) analysis to the U.S. state-level panel data of fuel efficiency, roadway lane-miles, and vehicle miles traveled (VMT) for over three decades (1980-2010). The analysis confirmed the co-existence of rebound effect and induced demand on driving distances over the decades-improved fuel efficiency and expanded roadway capacity caused additional vehicle distance traveled, partially offsetting the benefits of the measures taken. Furthermore, the results showed that the magnitude of each effect would be unjustifiably overestimated if this dual influence was not taken into consideration.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2071-1050</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2071-1050</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.3390/su9020219</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Basel: MDPI AG</publisher><subject>Consumption ; Cost control ; Energy efficiency ; Equilibrium ; Fuel consumption ; Infrastructure ; Roads &amp; highways ; Statistical analysis ; Sustainability ; Traffic congestion ; Travel ; Travel demand ; Vehicles</subject><ispartof>Sustainability, 2017, Vol.9 (2), p.219-219</ispartof><rights>Copyright MDPI AG 2017</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2409-f6ffc91cd96e65a9940671a786ac45dc689fdc2b0bba1124d9e5587403929f393</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2409-f6ffc91cd96e65a9940671a786ac45dc689fdc2b0bba1124d9e5587403929f393</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-4578-4107</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,4024,27923,27924,27925</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Byun, Jihye</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Park, Sungjin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jang, Kitae</creatorcontrib><title>Rebound Effect or Induced Demand? Analyzing the Compound Dual Effects on VMT in the U.S</title><title>Sustainability</title><description>This research explored the dual influence of fuel efficiency and roadway capacity on vehicle distance traveled. The empirical study was conducted by applying a generalized least square (GLS) analysis to the U.S. state-level panel data of fuel efficiency, roadway lane-miles, and vehicle miles traveled (VMT) for over three decades (1980-2010). The analysis confirmed the co-existence of rebound effect and induced demand on driving distances over the decades-improved fuel efficiency and expanded roadway capacity caused additional vehicle distance traveled, partially offsetting the benefits of the measures taken. Furthermore, the results showed that the magnitude of each effect would be unjustifiably overestimated if this dual influence was not taken into consideration.</description><subject>Consumption</subject><subject>Cost control</subject><subject>Energy efficiency</subject><subject>Equilibrium</subject><subject>Fuel consumption</subject><subject>Infrastructure</subject><subject>Roads &amp; highways</subject><subject>Statistical analysis</subject><subject>Sustainability</subject><subject>Traffic congestion</subject><subject>Travel</subject><subject>Travel demand</subject><subject>Vehicles</subject><issn>2071-1050</issn><issn>2071-1050</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2017</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><recordid>eNpdkEtLAzEUhYMoWGoX_oOAG11MzU0yj6yktFULFUFbXQ6ZPHTKTFInnUX99U4fiHg29yy-c-EchC6BDBkT5Da0glBCQZygHiUpREBicvrHn6NBCCvSiTEQkPTQ-4spfOs0nlpr1Ab7Bs-cbpXReGJq6fQdHjlZbb9L94E3nwaPfb3eByatrI6pgL3Db08LXLo9sxy-XqAzK6tgBsfbR8v76WL8GM2fH2bj0TxSlBMR2cRaJUBpkZgklkJwkqQg0yyRisdaJZmwWtGCFIUEoFwLE8dZygkTVFgmWB9dH_6uG__VmrDJ6zIoU1XSGd-GHLIM0rirmnXo1T905dumK7ej0owDMJ521M2BUo0PoTE2XzdlLZttDiTfrZz_rsx-AEuZa7g</recordid><startdate>2017</startdate><enddate>2017</enddate><creator>Byun, Jihye</creator><creator>Park, Sungjin</creator><creator>Jang, Kitae</creator><general>MDPI AG</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>4U-</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7U6</scope><scope>C1K</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4578-4107</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>2017</creationdate><title>Rebound Effect or Induced Demand? Analyzing the Compound Dual Effects on VMT in the U.S</title><author>Byun, Jihye ; Park, Sungjin ; Jang, Kitae</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c2409-f6ffc91cd96e65a9940671a786ac45dc689fdc2b0bba1124d9e5587403929f393</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2017</creationdate><topic>Consumption</topic><topic>Cost control</topic><topic>Energy efficiency</topic><topic>Equilibrium</topic><topic>Fuel consumption</topic><topic>Infrastructure</topic><topic>Roads &amp; highways</topic><topic>Statistical analysis</topic><topic>Sustainability</topic><topic>Traffic congestion</topic><topic>Travel</topic><topic>Travel demand</topic><topic>Vehicles</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Byun, Jihye</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Park, Sungjin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jang, Kitae</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>University Readers</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Sustainability Science Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><jtitle>Sustainability</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Byun, Jihye</au><au>Park, Sungjin</au><au>Jang, Kitae</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Rebound Effect or Induced Demand? Analyzing the Compound Dual Effects on VMT in the U.S</atitle><jtitle>Sustainability</jtitle><date>2017</date><risdate>2017</risdate><volume>9</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>219</spage><epage>219</epage><pages>219-219</pages><issn>2071-1050</issn><eissn>2071-1050</eissn><abstract>This research explored the dual influence of fuel efficiency and roadway capacity on vehicle distance traveled. The empirical study was conducted by applying a generalized least square (GLS) analysis to the U.S. state-level panel data of fuel efficiency, roadway lane-miles, and vehicle miles traveled (VMT) for over three decades (1980-2010). The analysis confirmed the co-existence of rebound effect and induced demand on driving distances over the decades-improved fuel efficiency and expanded roadway capacity caused additional vehicle distance traveled, partially offsetting the benefits of the measures taken. Furthermore, the results showed that the magnitude of each effect would be unjustifiably overestimated if this dual influence was not taken into consideration.</abstract><cop>Basel</cop><pub>MDPI AG</pub><doi>10.3390/su9020219</doi><tpages>1</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4578-4107</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 2071-1050
ispartof Sustainability, 2017, Vol.9 (2), p.219-219
issn 2071-1050
2071-1050
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1881759168
source MDPI - Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute; EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals
subjects Consumption
Cost control
Energy efficiency
Equilibrium
Fuel consumption
Infrastructure
Roads & highways
Statistical analysis
Sustainability
Traffic congestion
Travel
Travel demand
Vehicles
title Rebound Effect or Induced Demand? Analyzing the Compound Dual Effects on VMT in the U.S
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-24T06%3A23%3A32IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Rebound%20Effect%20or%20Induced%20Demand?%20Analyzing%20the%20Compound%20Dual%20Effects%20on%20VMT%20in%20the%20U.S&rft.jtitle=Sustainability&rft.au=Byun,%20Jihye&rft.date=2017&rft.volume=9&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=219&rft.epage=219&rft.pages=219-219&rft.issn=2071-1050&rft.eissn=2071-1050&rft_id=info:doi/10.3390/su9020219&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E4320950165%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1878411347&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true