Rebound Effect or Induced Demand? Analyzing the Compound Dual Effects on VMT in the U.S
This research explored the dual influence of fuel efficiency and roadway capacity on vehicle distance traveled. The empirical study was conducted by applying a generalized least square (GLS) analysis to the U.S. state-level panel data of fuel efficiency, roadway lane-miles, and vehicle miles travele...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Sustainability 2017, Vol.9 (2), p.219-219 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 219 |
---|---|
container_issue | 2 |
container_start_page | 219 |
container_title | Sustainability |
container_volume | 9 |
creator | Byun, Jihye Park, Sungjin Jang, Kitae |
description | This research explored the dual influence of fuel efficiency and roadway capacity on vehicle distance traveled. The empirical study was conducted by applying a generalized least square (GLS) analysis to the U.S. state-level panel data of fuel efficiency, roadway lane-miles, and vehicle miles traveled (VMT) for over three decades (1980-2010). The analysis confirmed the co-existence of rebound effect and induced demand on driving distances over the decades-improved fuel efficiency and expanded roadway capacity caused additional vehicle distance traveled, partially offsetting the benefits of the measures taken. Furthermore, the results showed that the magnitude of each effect would be unjustifiably overestimated if this dual influence was not taken into consideration. |
doi_str_mv | 10.3390/su9020219 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1881759168</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>4320950165</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2409-f6ffc91cd96e65a9940671a786ac45dc689fdc2b0bba1124d9e5587403929f393</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpdkEtLAzEUhYMoWGoX_oOAG11MzU0yj6yktFULFUFbXQ6ZPHTKTFInnUX99U4fiHg29yy-c-EchC6BDBkT5Da0glBCQZygHiUpREBicvrHn6NBCCvSiTEQkPTQ-4spfOs0nlpr1Ab7Bs-cbpXReGJq6fQdHjlZbb9L94E3nwaPfb3eByatrI6pgL3Db08LXLo9sxy-XqAzK6tgBsfbR8v76WL8GM2fH2bj0TxSlBMR2cRaJUBpkZgklkJwkqQg0yyRisdaJZmwWtGCFIUEoFwLE8dZygkTVFgmWB9dH_6uG__VmrDJ6zIoU1XSGd-GHLIM0rirmnXo1T905dumK7ej0owDMJ521M2BUo0PoTE2XzdlLZttDiTfrZz_rsx-AEuZa7g</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1878411347</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Rebound Effect or Induced Demand? Analyzing the Compound Dual Effects on VMT in the U.S</title><source>MDPI - Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><creator>Byun, Jihye ; Park, Sungjin ; Jang, Kitae</creator><creatorcontrib>Byun, Jihye ; Park, Sungjin ; Jang, Kitae</creatorcontrib><description>This research explored the dual influence of fuel efficiency and roadway capacity on vehicle distance traveled. The empirical study was conducted by applying a generalized least square (GLS) analysis to the U.S. state-level panel data of fuel efficiency, roadway lane-miles, and vehicle miles traveled (VMT) for over three decades (1980-2010). The analysis confirmed the co-existence of rebound effect and induced demand on driving distances over the decades-improved fuel efficiency and expanded roadway capacity caused additional vehicle distance traveled, partially offsetting the benefits of the measures taken. Furthermore, the results showed that the magnitude of each effect would be unjustifiably overestimated if this dual influence was not taken into consideration.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2071-1050</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2071-1050</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.3390/su9020219</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Basel: MDPI AG</publisher><subject>Consumption ; Cost control ; Energy efficiency ; Equilibrium ; Fuel consumption ; Infrastructure ; Roads & highways ; Statistical analysis ; Sustainability ; Traffic congestion ; Travel ; Travel demand ; Vehicles</subject><ispartof>Sustainability, 2017, Vol.9 (2), p.219-219</ispartof><rights>Copyright MDPI AG 2017</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2409-f6ffc91cd96e65a9940671a786ac45dc689fdc2b0bba1124d9e5587403929f393</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2409-f6ffc91cd96e65a9940671a786ac45dc689fdc2b0bba1124d9e5587403929f393</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-4578-4107</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,4024,27923,27924,27925</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Byun, Jihye</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Park, Sungjin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jang, Kitae</creatorcontrib><title>Rebound Effect or Induced Demand? Analyzing the Compound Dual Effects on VMT in the U.S</title><title>Sustainability</title><description>This research explored the dual influence of fuel efficiency and roadway capacity on vehicle distance traveled. The empirical study was conducted by applying a generalized least square (GLS) analysis to the U.S. state-level panel data of fuel efficiency, roadway lane-miles, and vehicle miles traveled (VMT) for over three decades (1980-2010). The analysis confirmed the co-existence of rebound effect and induced demand on driving distances over the decades-improved fuel efficiency and expanded roadway capacity caused additional vehicle distance traveled, partially offsetting the benefits of the measures taken. Furthermore, the results showed that the magnitude of each effect would be unjustifiably overestimated if this dual influence was not taken into consideration.</description><subject>Consumption</subject><subject>Cost control</subject><subject>Energy efficiency</subject><subject>Equilibrium</subject><subject>Fuel consumption</subject><subject>Infrastructure</subject><subject>Roads & highways</subject><subject>Statistical analysis</subject><subject>Sustainability</subject><subject>Traffic congestion</subject><subject>Travel</subject><subject>Travel demand</subject><subject>Vehicles</subject><issn>2071-1050</issn><issn>2071-1050</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2017</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><recordid>eNpdkEtLAzEUhYMoWGoX_oOAG11MzU0yj6yktFULFUFbXQ6ZPHTKTFInnUX99U4fiHg29yy-c-EchC6BDBkT5Da0glBCQZygHiUpREBicvrHn6NBCCvSiTEQkPTQ-4spfOs0nlpr1Ab7Bs-cbpXReGJq6fQdHjlZbb9L94E3nwaPfb3eByatrI6pgL3Db08LXLo9sxy-XqAzK6tgBsfbR8v76WL8GM2fH2bj0TxSlBMR2cRaJUBpkZgklkJwkqQg0yyRisdaJZmwWtGCFIUEoFwLE8dZygkTVFgmWB9dH_6uG__VmrDJ6zIoU1XSGd-GHLIM0rirmnXo1T905dumK7ej0owDMJ521M2BUo0PoTE2XzdlLZttDiTfrZz_rsx-AEuZa7g</recordid><startdate>2017</startdate><enddate>2017</enddate><creator>Byun, Jihye</creator><creator>Park, Sungjin</creator><creator>Jang, Kitae</creator><general>MDPI AG</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>4U-</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7U6</scope><scope>C1K</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4578-4107</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>2017</creationdate><title>Rebound Effect or Induced Demand? Analyzing the Compound Dual Effects on VMT in the U.S</title><author>Byun, Jihye ; Park, Sungjin ; Jang, Kitae</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c2409-f6ffc91cd96e65a9940671a786ac45dc689fdc2b0bba1124d9e5587403929f393</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2017</creationdate><topic>Consumption</topic><topic>Cost control</topic><topic>Energy efficiency</topic><topic>Equilibrium</topic><topic>Fuel consumption</topic><topic>Infrastructure</topic><topic>Roads & highways</topic><topic>Statistical analysis</topic><topic>Sustainability</topic><topic>Traffic congestion</topic><topic>Travel</topic><topic>Travel demand</topic><topic>Vehicles</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Byun, Jihye</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Park, Sungjin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jang, Kitae</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>University Readers</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Sustainability Science Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><jtitle>Sustainability</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Byun, Jihye</au><au>Park, Sungjin</au><au>Jang, Kitae</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Rebound Effect or Induced Demand? Analyzing the Compound Dual Effects on VMT in the U.S</atitle><jtitle>Sustainability</jtitle><date>2017</date><risdate>2017</risdate><volume>9</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>219</spage><epage>219</epage><pages>219-219</pages><issn>2071-1050</issn><eissn>2071-1050</eissn><abstract>This research explored the dual influence of fuel efficiency and roadway capacity on vehicle distance traveled. The empirical study was conducted by applying a generalized least square (GLS) analysis to the U.S. state-level panel data of fuel efficiency, roadway lane-miles, and vehicle miles traveled (VMT) for over three decades (1980-2010). The analysis confirmed the co-existence of rebound effect and induced demand on driving distances over the decades-improved fuel efficiency and expanded roadway capacity caused additional vehicle distance traveled, partially offsetting the benefits of the measures taken. Furthermore, the results showed that the magnitude of each effect would be unjustifiably overestimated if this dual influence was not taken into consideration.</abstract><cop>Basel</cop><pub>MDPI AG</pub><doi>10.3390/su9020219</doi><tpages>1</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4578-4107</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 2071-1050 |
ispartof | Sustainability, 2017, Vol.9 (2), p.219-219 |
issn | 2071-1050 2071-1050 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1881759168 |
source | MDPI - Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute; EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals |
subjects | Consumption Cost control Energy efficiency Equilibrium Fuel consumption Infrastructure Roads & highways Statistical analysis Sustainability Traffic congestion Travel Travel demand Vehicles |
title | Rebound Effect or Induced Demand? Analyzing the Compound Dual Effects on VMT in the U.S |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-24T06%3A23%3A32IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Rebound%20Effect%20or%20Induced%20Demand?%20Analyzing%20the%20Compound%20Dual%20Effects%20on%20VMT%20in%20the%20U.S&rft.jtitle=Sustainability&rft.au=Byun,%20Jihye&rft.date=2017&rft.volume=9&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=219&rft.epage=219&rft.pages=219-219&rft.issn=2071-1050&rft.eissn=2071-1050&rft_id=info:doi/10.3390/su9020219&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E4320950165%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1878411347&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |