A Meta-Analytical Approach of the Relationships Between the Irrationality of Beliefs and the Functionality of Automatic Thoughts
Although irrational beliefs (IBs) and automatic thoughts (ATs) have been proposed as mechanisms that contribute to psychopathology in the Cognitive Behavioral Therapy (CBT) model, surprisingly, no previous study systematically evaluated the magnitude and direction of the relationship between the two...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | Cognitive therapy and research 2017-04, Vol.41 (2), p.178-192 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 192 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 2 |
| container_start_page | 178 |
| container_title | Cognitive therapy and research |
| container_volume | 41 |
| creator | Şoflău, Radu David, Daniel O. |
| description | Although irrational beliefs (IBs) and automatic thoughts (ATs) have been proposed as mechanisms that contribute to psychopathology in the Cognitive Behavioral Therapy (CBT) model, surprisingly, no previous study systematically evaluated the magnitude and direction of the relationship between the two central constructs. Therefore, the present meta-analysis aimed to evaluate this association, considering its theoretical and clinical importance. We conducted a systematic search of the literature and included 34 experimental and correlational studies suited for the purpose of this meta-analysis, comprising 5086 participants. Results indicated a significant (
p
|
| doi_str_mv | 10.1007/s10608-016-9812-y |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1881754675</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1881754675</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c349t-c50a5e73270c7f35ccc284ab5c4792d73912f2dac1b8b351fea9f5bacf982a033</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp10U9LwzAYBvAgCs7pB_BW8OIlmj9Nkxy74XQwEWSeQ5Yla0fXziRFevOj224eVPD0Ht7f88LLA8A1RncYIX4fMMqQgAhnUApMYHcCRphxConA8hSMEE45ZBJn5-AihC1CKGOEjcBnnjzbqGFe66qLpdFVku_3vtGmSBqXxMImr7bSsWzqUJT7kExs_LC2Pmzm3h82uipjN_CJrUrrQqLr9QHM2tr8Ankbm12fMcmyaNpNEcMlOHO6Cvbqe47B2-xhOX2Ci5fH-TRfQENTGaFhSDPLKeHIcEeZMYaIVK-YSbkka04lJo6stcErsaIMO6ulYyttnBREI0rH4PZ4t3_uvbUhql0ZjK0qXdumDQoLgTlLM856evOHbpvW908MimeIklSKXuGjMr4JwVun9r7cad8pjNTQiTp2ovpO1NCJ6voMOWZCb-uN9T8u_xv6ArypkQo</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1876032498</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>A Meta-Analytical Approach of the Relationships Between the Irrationality of Beliefs and the Functionality of Automatic Thoughts</title><source>SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings</source><creator>Şoflău, Radu ; David, Daniel O.</creator><creatorcontrib>Şoflău, Radu ; David, Daniel O.</creatorcontrib><description>Although irrational beliefs (IBs) and automatic thoughts (ATs) have been proposed as mechanisms that contribute to psychopathology in the Cognitive Behavioral Therapy (CBT) model, surprisingly, no previous study systematically evaluated the magnitude and direction of the relationship between the two central constructs. Therefore, the present meta-analysis aimed to evaluate this association, considering its theoretical and clinical importance. We conducted a systematic search of the literature and included 34 experimental and correlational studies suited for the purpose of this meta-analysis, comprising 5086 participants. Results indicated a significant (
p
< .001) medium sized association (
r
= .43) for the relationship between the irrationality of beliefs and the functionality of ATs, higher levels of IBs being associated with more dysfunctional ATs. The magnitude of the relationship does not depend on the specific CBT theoretical model through which the two variables were approached and it is not influenced by the context, nor by the object of the beliefs. However, the content of beliefs appears to impact on this relationship, given that the results revealed a significant (
p
< .001) large effect size (
r
= .58) for the association of ATs with certainty beliefs, but no association was present for control beliefs. Results also suggest that primary and secondary IBs equally impact on ATs’ functionality and should be equally addressed in psychological interventions. Further theoretical and practical implications, and future directions are discussed.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0147-5916</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1573-2819</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s10608-016-9812-y</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New York: Springer US</publisher><subject>Clinical Psychology ; Cognitive Psychology ; Medicine ; Medicine & Public Health ; Original Article ; Quality of Life Research ; Systematic review</subject><ispartof>Cognitive therapy and research, 2017-04, Vol.41 (2), p.178-192</ispartof><rights>Springer Science+Business Media New York 2016</rights><rights>Cognitive Therapy and Research is a copyright of Springer, 2017.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c349t-c50a5e73270c7f35ccc284ab5c4792d73912f2dac1b8b351fea9f5bacf982a033</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c349t-c50a5e73270c7f35ccc284ab5c4792d73912f2dac1b8b351fea9f5bacf982a033</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s10608-016-9812-y$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10608-016-9812-y$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902,41464,42533,51294</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Şoflău, Radu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>David, Daniel O.</creatorcontrib><title>A Meta-Analytical Approach of the Relationships Between the Irrationality of Beliefs and the Functionality of Automatic Thoughts</title><title>Cognitive therapy and research</title><addtitle>Cogn Ther Res</addtitle><description>Although irrational beliefs (IBs) and automatic thoughts (ATs) have been proposed as mechanisms that contribute to psychopathology in the Cognitive Behavioral Therapy (CBT) model, surprisingly, no previous study systematically evaluated the magnitude and direction of the relationship between the two central constructs. Therefore, the present meta-analysis aimed to evaluate this association, considering its theoretical and clinical importance. We conducted a systematic search of the literature and included 34 experimental and correlational studies suited for the purpose of this meta-analysis, comprising 5086 participants. Results indicated a significant (
p
< .001) medium sized association (
r
= .43) for the relationship between the irrationality of beliefs and the functionality of ATs, higher levels of IBs being associated with more dysfunctional ATs. The magnitude of the relationship does not depend on the specific CBT theoretical model through which the two variables were approached and it is not influenced by the context, nor by the object of the beliefs. However, the content of beliefs appears to impact on this relationship, given that the results revealed a significant (
p
< .001) large effect size (
r
= .58) for the association of ATs with certainty beliefs, but no association was present for control beliefs. Results also suggest that primary and secondary IBs equally impact on ATs’ functionality and should be equally addressed in psychological interventions. Further theoretical and practical implications, and future directions are discussed.</description><subject>Clinical Psychology</subject><subject>Cognitive Psychology</subject><subject>Medicine</subject><subject>Medicine & Public Health</subject><subject>Original Article</subject><subject>Quality of Life Research</subject><subject>Systematic review</subject><issn>0147-5916</issn><issn>1573-2819</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2017</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNp10U9LwzAYBvAgCs7pB_BW8OIlmj9Nkxy74XQwEWSeQ5Yla0fXziRFevOj224eVPD0Ht7f88LLA8A1RncYIX4fMMqQgAhnUApMYHcCRphxConA8hSMEE45ZBJn5-AihC1CKGOEjcBnnjzbqGFe66qLpdFVku_3vtGmSBqXxMImr7bSsWzqUJT7kExs_LC2Pmzm3h82uipjN_CJrUrrQqLr9QHM2tr8Ankbm12fMcmyaNpNEcMlOHO6Cvbqe47B2-xhOX2Ci5fH-TRfQENTGaFhSDPLKeHIcEeZMYaIVK-YSbkka04lJo6stcErsaIMO6ulYyttnBREI0rH4PZ4t3_uvbUhql0ZjK0qXdumDQoLgTlLM856evOHbpvW908MimeIklSKXuGjMr4JwVun9r7cad8pjNTQiTp2ovpO1NCJ6voMOWZCb-uN9T8u_xv6ArypkQo</recordid><startdate>20170401</startdate><enddate>20170401</enddate><creator>Şoflău, Radu</creator><creator>David, Daniel O.</creator><general>Springer US</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>0-V</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7TK</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88G</scope><scope>88J</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ALSLI</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>M2M</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>M2R</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PSYQQ</scope><scope>Q9U</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20170401</creationdate><title>A Meta-Analytical Approach of the Relationships Between the Irrationality of Beliefs and the Functionality of Automatic Thoughts</title><author>Şoflău, Radu ; David, Daniel O.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c349t-c50a5e73270c7f35ccc284ab5c4792d73912f2dac1b8b351fea9f5bacf982a033</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2017</creationdate><topic>Clinical Psychology</topic><topic>Cognitive Psychology</topic><topic>Medicine</topic><topic>Medicine & Public Health</topic><topic>Original Article</topic><topic>Quality of Life Research</topic><topic>Systematic review</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Şoflău, Radu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>David, Daniel O.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Social Sciences Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Neurosciences Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Psychology Database (Alumni)</collection><collection>Social Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Social Science Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>ProQuest Psychology</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Social Science Database</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest One Psychology</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><jtitle>Cognitive therapy and research</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Şoflău, Radu</au><au>David, Daniel O.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>A Meta-Analytical Approach of the Relationships Between the Irrationality of Beliefs and the Functionality of Automatic Thoughts</atitle><jtitle>Cognitive therapy and research</jtitle><stitle>Cogn Ther Res</stitle><date>2017-04-01</date><risdate>2017</risdate><volume>41</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>178</spage><epage>192</epage><pages>178-192</pages><issn>0147-5916</issn><eissn>1573-2819</eissn><abstract>Although irrational beliefs (IBs) and automatic thoughts (ATs) have been proposed as mechanisms that contribute to psychopathology in the Cognitive Behavioral Therapy (CBT) model, surprisingly, no previous study systematically evaluated the magnitude and direction of the relationship between the two central constructs. Therefore, the present meta-analysis aimed to evaluate this association, considering its theoretical and clinical importance. We conducted a systematic search of the literature and included 34 experimental and correlational studies suited for the purpose of this meta-analysis, comprising 5086 participants. Results indicated a significant (
p
< .001) medium sized association (
r
= .43) for the relationship between the irrationality of beliefs and the functionality of ATs, higher levels of IBs being associated with more dysfunctional ATs. The magnitude of the relationship does not depend on the specific CBT theoretical model through which the two variables were approached and it is not influenced by the context, nor by the object of the beliefs. However, the content of beliefs appears to impact on this relationship, given that the results revealed a significant (
p
< .001) large effect size (
r
= .58) for the association of ATs with certainty beliefs, but no association was present for control beliefs. Results also suggest that primary and secondary IBs equally impact on ATs’ functionality and should be equally addressed in psychological interventions. Further theoretical and practical implications, and future directions are discussed.</abstract><cop>New York</cop><pub>Springer US</pub><doi>10.1007/s10608-016-9812-y</doi><tpages>15</tpages></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 0147-5916 |
| ispartof | Cognitive therapy and research, 2017-04, Vol.41 (2), p.178-192 |
| issn | 0147-5916 1573-2819 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1881754675 |
| source | SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings |
| subjects | Clinical Psychology Cognitive Psychology Medicine Medicine & Public Health Original Article Quality of Life Research Systematic review |
| title | A Meta-Analytical Approach of the Relationships Between the Irrationality of Beliefs and the Functionality of Automatic Thoughts |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-05T16%3A32%3A27IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=A%20Meta-Analytical%20Approach%20of%20the%20Relationships%20Between%20the%20Irrationality%20of%20Beliefs%20and%20the%20Functionality%20of%20Automatic%20Thoughts&rft.jtitle=Cognitive%20therapy%20and%20research&rft.au=%C5%9Eofl%C4%83u,%20Radu&rft.date=2017-04-01&rft.volume=41&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=178&rft.epage=192&rft.pages=178-192&rft.issn=0147-5916&rft.eissn=1573-2819&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s10608-016-9812-y&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1881754675%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1876032498&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |