Identifying management actions to increase foraging opportunities for shorebirds at semi-intensive shrimp farms

1. The expansion of aquaculture has resulted in widespread habitat conversion throughout the world. Identifying beneficial management measures may dramatically reduce negative impacts of aquaculture for migratory birds. 2. We studied how densities of foraging shorebirds varied at ponds within a semi...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:The Journal of applied ecology 2017-04, Vol.54 (2), p.567-576
Hauptverfasser: Navedo, Juan G., Fernández, Guillermo, Valdivia, Nelson, Drever, Mark C., Masero, José A.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 576
container_issue 2
container_start_page 567
container_title The Journal of applied ecology
container_volume 54
creator Navedo, Juan G.
Fernández, Guillermo
Valdivia, Nelson
Drever, Mark C.
Masero, José A.
description 1. The expansion of aquaculture has resulted in widespread habitat conversion throughout the world. Identifying beneficial management measures may dramatically reduce negative impacts of aquaculture for migratory birds. 2. We studied how densities of foraging shorebirds varied at ponds within a semi-intensive shrimp aquaculture farm on the north-western coast of Mexico, as related to timing of harvest and tidal cycles. Further, we estimated the total daily available area for each shorebird species throughout two entire harvesting seasons at the shrimp farm. 3. High densities (average ca. 50 individuals per ha) of foraging shorebirds were found during the first days following pond harvest. The most abundant species were Willet Tringa semi-palmata and Black-necked Stilt Himantopus mexicanus, followed by Marbled Godwit Limosa fedoa and American Avocet Recurvirostra americana. Other regular, but less abundant, species were whimbrel Numenius phaeopus and dowitchers Limnodromus spp. 4. Densities of shorebirds sharply declined daily following harvest. In addition, the time-window availability of harvested ponds was related to each species' foraging behaviour: < 2 days for godwits and dowitchers, 4 days for stilts, 5 days for willets and more than a week for avocets and whimbrels. However, birds continued to use harvested ponds that received a low, but continuous water influx. 5. Our results demonstrate that a tropical shrimp farm represents a patchy environment that provides 4.3-12.7% (depending on species) of its total area as foraging opportunities for shorebirds. 6. Synthesis and applications. Sequential harvesting of shrimp aquaculture farm ponds and increasing moisture of the substrate by providing some water supply to harvested ponds, at least throughout the harvesting period, could integrate shorebird conservation into shrimpfarm production. These low-cost and easy management procedures would not increase costs or affect shrimp production - thus representing a win-win opportunity - and would have potential applications for shorebird conservation throughout the world.
doi_str_mv 10.1111/1365-2664.12735
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>jstor_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1881750849</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>44214130</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>44214130</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4775-37f33860c552c2c94dd6a81ad29855889ed512785e24c2ad487757f11edfc63a3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkTtrHDEURkWIIRs7daqAwE2asfWc0ZTG-BUMceHUQtHc2WjZkSa62pj999Z4Exduokbw6RxxH4R85uyM13POZasb0bbqjItO6ndk9Zq8JyvGBG9Mz_gH8hFxwxjrtZQrku4GiCWM-xDXdHLRrWGqAXW-hBSRlkRD9BkcAh1TduuFS_OcctnFUALgElP8lTL8DHlA6gpFmEITYoGI4Q_UxxymmY4uT3hCjka3Rfj09z4mP66vHi9vm_vvN3eXF_eNV12nG9mNUpqWea2FF75Xw9A6w90geqO1MT0MurZpNAjlhRuUqVY3cg7D6Fvp5DH5evh3zun3DrDYKaCH7dZFSDu03BjeaWZUX9HTN-gm7XKs1VWqM0LITvFKnR8onxNihtHOtSuX95YzuyzALuO2y7jtywKqoQ_GU9jC_n-4_fZw9c_7cvA2WFJ-9ZQSvNbB5DONqZIu</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1878223741</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Identifying management actions to increase foraging opportunities for shorebirds at semi-intensive shrimp farms</title><source>JSTOR Archive Collection A-Z Listing</source><source>Wiley Free Content</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><source>Wiley Online Library All Journals</source><creator>Navedo, Juan G. ; Fernández, Guillermo ; Valdivia, Nelson ; Drever, Mark C. ; Masero, José A.</creator><contributor>Bauer, Silke</contributor><creatorcontrib>Navedo, Juan G. ; Fernández, Guillermo ; Valdivia, Nelson ; Drever, Mark C. ; Masero, José A. ; Bauer, Silke</creatorcontrib><description>1. The expansion of aquaculture has resulted in widespread habitat conversion throughout the world. Identifying beneficial management measures may dramatically reduce negative impacts of aquaculture for migratory birds. 2. We studied how densities of foraging shorebirds varied at ponds within a semi-intensive shrimp aquaculture farm on the north-western coast of Mexico, as related to timing of harvest and tidal cycles. Further, we estimated the total daily available area for each shorebird species throughout two entire harvesting seasons at the shrimp farm. 3. High densities (average ca. 50 individuals per ha) of foraging shorebirds were found during the first days following pond harvest. The most abundant species were Willet Tringa semi-palmata and Black-necked Stilt Himantopus mexicanus, followed by Marbled Godwit Limosa fedoa and American Avocet Recurvirostra americana. Other regular, but less abundant, species were whimbrel Numenius phaeopus and dowitchers Limnodromus spp. 4. Densities of shorebirds sharply declined daily following harvest. In addition, the time-window availability of harvested ponds was related to each species' foraging behaviour: &lt; 2 days for godwits and dowitchers, 4 days for stilts, 5 days for willets and more than a week for avocets and whimbrels. However, birds continued to use harvested ponds that received a low, but continuous water influx. 5. Our results demonstrate that a tropical shrimp farm represents a patchy environment that provides 4.3-12.7% (depending on species) of its total area as foraging opportunities for shorebirds. 6. Synthesis and applications. Sequential harvesting of shrimp aquaculture farm ponds and increasing moisture of the substrate by providing some water supply to harvested ponds, at least throughout the harvesting period, could integrate shorebird conservation into shrimpfarm production. These low-cost and easy management procedures would not increase costs or affect shrimp production - thus representing a win-win opportunity - and would have potential applications for shorebird conservation throughout the world.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0021-8901</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1365-2664</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/1365-2664.12735</identifier><identifier>CODEN: JAPEAI</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Oxford: John Wiley &amp; Sons Ltd</publisher><subject>Aquaculture ; Aquatic systems ; Birds ; Conservation ; Decapoda ; Foraging behavior ; habitat use ; harvest operations ; Himantopus mexicanus ; Limnodromus ; Limosa fedoa ; man‐made habitats ; Mexico ; non‐breeding season ; Numenius phaeopus ; Recurvirostra americana ; Shellfish ; shorebirds ; shrimp farms ; Tringa ; tropics</subject><ispartof>The Journal of applied ecology, 2017-04, Vol.54 (2), p.567-576</ispartof><rights>2017 British Ecological Society</rights><rights>2016 The Authors. Journal of Applied Ecology © 2016 British Ecological Society</rights><rights>Journal of Applied Ecology © 2017 British Ecological Society</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4775-37f33860c552c2c94dd6a81ad29855889ed512785e24c2ad487757f11edfc63a3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4775-37f33860c552c2c94dd6a81ad29855889ed512785e24c2ad487757f11edfc63a3</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-3451-1792</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/44214130$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/44214130$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,803,1416,1432,27922,27923,45572,45573,46407,46831,58015,58248</link.rule.ids></links><search><contributor>Bauer, Silke</contributor><creatorcontrib>Navedo, Juan G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fernández, Guillermo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Valdivia, Nelson</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Drever, Mark C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Masero, José A.</creatorcontrib><title>Identifying management actions to increase foraging opportunities for shorebirds at semi-intensive shrimp farms</title><title>The Journal of applied ecology</title><description>1. The expansion of aquaculture has resulted in widespread habitat conversion throughout the world. Identifying beneficial management measures may dramatically reduce negative impacts of aquaculture for migratory birds. 2. We studied how densities of foraging shorebirds varied at ponds within a semi-intensive shrimp aquaculture farm on the north-western coast of Mexico, as related to timing of harvest and tidal cycles. Further, we estimated the total daily available area for each shorebird species throughout two entire harvesting seasons at the shrimp farm. 3. High densities (average ca. 50 individuals per ha) of foraging shorebirds were found during the first days following pond harvest. The most abundant species were Willet Tringa semi-palmata and Black-necked Stilt Himantopus mexicanus, followed by Marbled Godwit Limosa fedoa and American Avocet Recurvirostra americana. Other regular, but less abundant, species were whimbrel Numenius phaeopus and dowitchers Limnodromus spp. 4. Densities of shorebirds sharply declined daily following harvest. In addition, the time-window availability of harvested ponds was related to each species' foraging behaviour: &lt; 2 days for godwits and dowitchers, 4 days for stilts, 5 days for willets and more than a week for avocets and whimbrels. However, birds continued to use harvested ponds that received a low, but continuous water influx. 5. Our results demonstrate that a tropical shrimp farm represents a patchy environment that provides 4.3-12.7% (depending on species) of its total area as foraging opportunities for shorebirds. 6. Synthesis and applications. Sequential harvesting of shrimp aquaculture farm ponds and increasing moisture of the substrate by providing some water supply to harvested ponds, at least throughout the harvesting period, could integrate shorebird conservation into shrimpfarm production. These low-cost and easy management procedures would not increase costs or affect shrimp production - thus representing a win-win opportunity - and would have potential applications for shorebird conservation throughout the world.</description><subject>Aquaculture</subject><subject>Aquatic systems</subject><subject>Birds</subject><subject>Conservation</subject><subject>Decapoda</subject><subject>Foraging behavior</subject><subject>habitat use</subject><subject>harvest operations</subject><subject>Himantopus mexicanus</subject><subject>Limnodromus</subject><subject>Limosa fedoa</subject><subject>man‐made habitats</subject><subject>Mexico</subject><subject>non‐breeding season</subject><subject>Numenius phaeopus</subject><subject>Recurvirostra americana</subject><subject>Shellfish</subject><subject>shorebirds</subject><subject>shrimp farms</subject><subject>Tringa</subject><subject>tropics</subject><issn>0021-8901</issn><issn>1365-2664</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2017</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqFkTtrHDEURkWIIRs7daqAwE2asfWc0ZTG-BUMceHUQtHc2WjZkSa62pj999Z4Exduokbw6RxxH4R85uyM13POZasb0bbqjItO6ndk9Zq8JyvGBG9Mz_gH8hFxwxjrtZQrku4GiCWM-xDXdHLRrWGqAXW-hBSRlkRD9BkcAh1TduuFS_OcctnFUALgElP8lTL8DHlA6gpFmEITYoGI4Q_UxxymmY4uT3hCjka3Rfj09z4mP66vHi9vm_vvN3eXF_eNV12nG9mNUpqWea2FF75Xw9A6w90geqO1MT0MurZpNAjlhRuUqVY3cg7D6Fvp5DH5evh3zun3DrDYKaCH7dZFSDu03BjeaWZUX9HTN-gm7XKs1VWqM0LITvFKnR8onxNihtHOtSuX95YzuyzALuO2y7jtywKqoQ_GU9jC_n-4_fZw9c_7cvA2WFJ-9ZQSvNbB5DONqZIu</recordid><startdate>201704</startdate><enddate>201704</enddate><creator>Navedo, Juan G.</creator><creator>Fernández, Guillermo</creator><creator>Valdivia, Nelson</creator><creator>Drever, Mark C.</creator><creator>Masero, José A.</creator><general>John Wiley &amp; Sons Ltd</general><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7SS</scope><scope>7T7</scope><scope>7U7</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>RC3</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3451-1792</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>201704</creationdate><title>Identifying management actions to increase foraging opportunities for shorebirds at semi-intensive shrimp farms</title><author>Navedo, Juan G. ; Fernández, Guillermo ; Valdivia, Nelson ; Drever, Mark C. ; Masero, José A.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4775-37f33860c552c2c94dd6a81ad29855889ed512785e24c2ad487757f11edfc63a3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2017</creationdate><topic>Aquaculture</topic><topic>Aquatic systems</topic><topic>Birds</topic><topic>Conservation</topic><topic>Decapoda</topic><topic>Foraging behavior</topic><topic>habitat use</topic><topic>harvest operations</topic><topic>Himantopus mexicanus</topic><topic>Limnodromus</topic><topic>Limosa fedoa</topic><topic>man‐made habitats</topic><topic>Mexico</topic><topic>non‐breeding season</topic><topic>Numenius phaeopus</topic><topic>Recurvirostra americana</topic><topic>Shellfish</topic><topic>shorebirds</topic><topic>shrimp farms</topic><topic>Tringa</topic><topic>tropics</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Navedo, Juan G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fernández, Guillermo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Valdivia, Nelson</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Drever, Mark C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Masero, José A.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Entomology Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Industrial and Applied Microbiology Abstracts (Microbiology A)</collection><collection>Toxicology Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Genetics Abstracts</collection><jtitle>The Journal of applied ecology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Navedo, Juan G.</au><au>Fernández, Guillermo</au><au>Valdivia, Nelson</au><au>Drever, Mark C.</au><au>Masero, José A.</au><au>Bauer, Silke</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Identifying management actions to increase foraging opportunities for shorebirds at semi-intensive shrimp farms</atitle><jtitle>The Journal of applied ecology</jtitle><date>2017-04</date><risdate>2017</risdate><volume>54</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>567</spage><epage>576</epage><pages>567-576</pages><issn>0021-8901</issn><eissn>1365-2664</eissn><coden>JAPEAI</coden><abstract>1. The expansion of aquaculture has resulted in widespread habitat conversion throughout the world. Identifying beneficial management measures may dramatically reduce negative impacts of aquaculture for migratory birds. 2. We studied how densities of foraging shorebirds varied at ponds within a semi-intensive shrimp aquaculture farm on the north-western coast of Mexico, as related to timing of harvest and tidal cycles. Further, we estimated the total daily available area for each shorebird species throughout two entire harvesting seasons at the shrimp farm. 3. High densities (average ca. 50 individuals per ha) of foraging shorebirds were found during the first days following pond harvest. The most abundant species were Willet Tringa semi-palmata and Black-necked Stilt Himantopus mexicanus, followed by Marbled Godwit Limosa fedoa and American Avocet Recurvirostra americana. Other regular, but less abundant, species were whimbrel Numenius phaeopus and dowitchers Limnodromus spp. 4. Densities of shorebirds sharply declined daily following harvest. In addition, the time-window availability of harvested ponds was related to each species' foraging behaviour: &lt; 2 days for godwits and dowitchers, 4 days for stilts, 5 days for willets and more than a week for avocets and whimbrels. However, birds continued to use harvested ponds that received a low, but continuous water influx. 5. Our results demonstrate that a tropical shrimp farm represents a patchy environment that provides 4.3-12.7% (depending on species) of its total area as foraging opportunities for shorebirds. 6. Synthesis and applications. Sequential harvesting of shrimp aquaculture farm ponds and increasing moisture of the substrate by providing some water supply to harvested ponds, at least throughout the harvesting period, could integrate shorebird conservation into shrimpfarm production. These low-cost and easy management procedures would not increase costs or affect shrimp production - thus representing a win-win opportunity - and would have potential applications for shorebird conservation throughout the world.</abstract><cop>Oxford</cop><pub>John Wiley &amp; Sons Ltd</pub><doi>10.1111/1365-2664.12735</doi><tpages>10</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3451-1792</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0021-8901
ispartof The Journal of applied ecology, 2017-04, Vol.54 (2), p.567-576
issn 0021-8901
1365-2664
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1881750849
source JSTOR Archive Collection A-Z Listing; Wiley Free Content; EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals; Wiley Online Library All Journals
subjects Aquaculture
Aquatic systems
Birds
Conservation
Decapoda
Foraging behavior
habitat use
harvest operations
Himantopus mexicanus
Limnodromus
Limosa fedoa
man‐made habitats
Mexico
non‐breeding season
Numenius phaeopus
Recurvirostra americana
Shellfish
shorebirds
shrimp farms
Tringa
tropics
title Identifying management actions to increase foraging opportunities for shorebirds at semi-intensive shrimp farms
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-13T21%3A21%3A29IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Identifying%20management%20actions%20to%20increase%20foraging%20opportunities%20for%20shorebirds%20at%20semi-intensive%20shrimp%20farms&rft.jtitle=The%20Journal%20of%20applied%20ecology&rft.au=Navedo,%20Juan%20G.&rft.date=2017-04&rft.volume=54&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=567&rft.epage=576&rft.pages=567-576&rft.issn=0021-8901&rft.eissn=1365-2664&rft.coden=JAPEAI&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/1365-2664.12735&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_proqu%3E44214130%3C/jstor_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1878223741&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_jstor_id=44214130&rfr_iscdi=true