Validating subject‐specific RF and thermal simulations in the calf muscle using MR‐based temperature measurements
Purpose Ongoing discussions occur to translate the safety restrictions on MR scanners from specific absorption rate (SAR) to thermal dose. Therefore, this research focuses on the accuracy of thermal simulations in human subjects during an MR exam, which is fundamental information in that debate. Met...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Magnetic resonance in medicine 2017-04, Vol.77 (4), p.1691-1700 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 1700 |
---|---|
container_issue | 4 |
container_start_page | 1691 |
container_title | Magnetic resonance in medicine |
container_volume | 77 |
creator | Simonis, F.F.J. Raaijmakers, A.J.E. Lagendijk, J.J.W. van den Berg, C.A.T. |
description | Purpose
Ongoing discussions occur to translate the safety restrictions on MR scanners from specific absorption rate (SAR) to thermal dose. Therefore, this research focuses on the accuracy of thermal simulations in human subjects during an MR exam, which is fundamental information in that debate.
Methods
Radiofrequency (RF) heating experiments were performed on the calves of 13 healthy subjects using a dedicated transmit‐receive coil while monitoring the temperature with proton resonance frequency shift (PRFS) thermometry. Subject‐specific models and one generic model were used for electromagnetic and thermal simulations using Pennes' bioheat equation, with the blood equilibration constant equaling zero. The simulations were subsequently compared with the experimental results.
Results
The mean
B1+ equaled 15 µT in the center slice of all volunteers, and 95% of the voxels had errors smaller than 2.8 µT between the simulation and measurement. The intersubject variation in RF power to achieve the required
B1+ was 11%. The resulting intersubject variation in median temperature rise was 14%. Thermal simulations underestimated the median temperature increase on average, with 34% in subject‐specific models and 28% in the generic model.
Conclusions
Although thermal measures are directly coupled to tissue damage and therefore suitable for RF safety assessment, insecurities in the applied thermal modeling limit their estimation accuracy. Magn Reson Med 77:1691–1700, 2017. © 2016 International Society for Magnetic Resonance in Medicine |
doi_str_mv | 10.1002/mrm.26244 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1881750676</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1881750676</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3874-75386c1354cd42ba1b0aa6485b687bb377862d3a68487d1727b964faad1aa8253</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkc9qGzEQxkVJqV2nh7xAEOTSy8b6t5L2GEz-FGIKps11GWnlRkZaO6sVIbc-Qp6xTxLZSXroqacZZn7zwXwfQieUnFNC2DwO8ZxJJsQHNKU1YxWrG3GEpkQJUnHaiAn6nNKGENI0SnxCE6YoI4LwKcp3EHwHo-9_4ZTNxtnxz-_ntHPWr73FqysMfYfHezdECDj5mEOBt33Cvt-PsYWwxjEnGxzOaS-zXBUFA8mVOxd3boAxDw5HB6nU6PoxHaOPawjJfXmrM_Tz6vLH4qa6_X79bXFxW1mulahUzbW0lNfCdoIZoIYASKFrI7UyhiulJes4SC206qhiyjRSrAE6CqBZzWfo66vubtg-ZJfGNvpkXQjQu21OLdWaqppIJf8DZVIWPyUr6Nk_6Gabh748UihVN5LTA3X6RmUTXdfuBh9heGrfvS_A_BV49ME9_d1T0u5DbUuo7SHUdrlaHhr-AvKxlUc</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1875963162</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Validating subject‐specific RF and thermal simulations in the calf muscle using MR‐based temperature measurements</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Access via Wiley Online Library</source><source>Wiley Online Library (Open Access Collection)</source><creator>Simonis, F.F.J. ; Raaijmakers, A.J.E. ; Lagendijk, J.J.W. ; van den Berg, C.A.T.</creator><creatorcontrib>Simonis, F.F.J. ; Raaijmakers, A.J.E. ; Lagendijk, J.J.W. ; van den Berg, C.A.T.</creatorcontrib><description>Purpose
Ongoing discussions occur to translate the safety restrictions on MR scanners from specific absorption rate (SAR) to thermal dose. Therefore, this research focuses on the accuracy of thermal simulations in human subjects during an MR exam, which is fundamental information in that debate.
Methods
Radiofrequency (RF) heating experiments were performed on the calves of 13 healthy subjects using a dedicated transmit‐receive coil while monitoring the temperature with proton resonance frequency shift (PRFS) thermometry. Subject‐specific models and one generic model were used for electromagnetic and thermal simulations using Pennes' bioheat equation, with the blood equilibration constant equaling zero. The simulations were subsequently compared with the experimental results.
Results
The mean
B1+ equaled 15 µT in the center slice of all volunteers, and 95% of the voxels had errors smaller than 2.8 µT between the simulation and measurement. The intersubject variation in RF power to achieve the required
B1+ was 11%. The resulting intersubject variation in median temperature rise was 14%. Thermal simulations underestimated the median temperature increase on average, with 34% in subject‐specific models and 28% in the generic model.
Conclusions
Although thermal measures are directly coupled to tissue damage and therefore suitable for RF safety assessment, insecurities in the applied thermal modeling limit their estimation accuracy. Magn Reson Med 77:1691–1700, 2017. © 2016 International Society for Magnetic Resonance in Medicine</description><identifier>ISSN: 0740-3194</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1522-2594</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1002/mrm.26244</identifier><identifier>PMID: 27120403</identifier><identifier>CODEN: MRMEEN</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</publisher><subject>Body Temperature - physiology ; EM modeling ; Female ; Humans ; Image Interpretation, Computer-Assisted - methods ; Leg ; Magnetic Resonance Imaging - methods ; Male ; Models, Biological ; Models, Statistical ; Muscle, Skeletal - anatomy & histology ; Muscle, Skeletal - physiology ; Radio Waves ; Reproducibility of Results ; RF safety ; SAR ; Sensitivity and Specificity ; Temperature ; thermal modeling ; Thermography - methods ; thermoregulation</subject><ispartof>Magnetic resonance in medicine, 2017-04, Vol.77 (4), p.1691-1700</ispartof><rights>2016 International Society for Magnetic Resonance in Medicine</rights><rights>2016 International Society for Magnetic Resonance in Medicine.</rights><rights>2017 International Society for Magnetic Resonance in Medicine</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3874-75386c1354cd42ba1b0aa6485b687bb377862d3a68487d1727b964faad1aa8253</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002%2Fmrm.26244$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002%2Fmrm.26244$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,1417,1433,27924,27925,45574,45575,46409,46833</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27120403$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Simonis, F.F.J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Raaijmakers, A.J.E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lagendijk, J.J.W.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>van den Berg, C.A.T.</creatorcontrib><title>Validating subject‐specific RF and thermal simulations in the calf muscle using MR‐based temperature measurements</title><title>Magnetic resonance in medicine</title><addtitle>Magn Reson Med</addtitle><description>Purpose
Ongoing discussions occur to translate the safety restrictions on MR scanners from specific absorption rate (SAR) to thermal dose. Therefore, this research focuses on the accuracy of thermal simulations in human subjects during an MR exam, which is fundamental information in that debate.
Methods
Radiofrequency (RF) heating experiments were performed on the calves of 13 healthy subjects using a dedicated transmit‐receive coil while monitoring the temperature with proton resonance frequency shift (PRFS) thermometry. Subject‐specific models and one generic model were used for electromagnetic and thermal simulations using Pennes' bioheat equation, with the blood equilibration constant equaling zero. The simulations were subsequently compared with the experimental results.
Results
The mean
B1+ equaled 15 µT in the center slice of all volunteers, and 95% of the voxels had errors smaller than 2.8 µT between the simulation and measurement. The intersubject variation in RF power to achieve the required
B1+ was 11%. The resulting intersubject variation in median temperature rise was 14%. Thermal simulations underestimated the median temperature increase on average, with 34% in subject‐specific models and 28% in the generic model.
Conclusions
Although thermal measures are directly coupled to tissue damage and therefore suitable for RF safety assessment, insecurities in the applied thermal modeling limit their estimation accuracy. Magn Reson Med 77:1691–1700, 2017. © 2016 International Society for Magnetic Resonance in Medicine</description><subject>Body Temperature - physiology</subject><subject>EM modeling</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Image Interpretation, Computer-Assisted - methods</subject><subject>Leg</subject><subject>Magnetic Resonance Imaging - methods</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Models, Biological</subject><subject>Models, Statistical</subject><subject>Muscle, Skeletal - anatomy & histology</subject><subject>Muscle, Skeletal - physiology</subject><subject>Radio Waves</subject><subject>Reproducibility of Results</subject><subject>RF safety</subject><subject>SAR</subject><subject>Sensitivity and Specificity</subject><subject>Temperature</subject><subject>thermal modeling</subject><subject>Thermography - methods</subject><subject>thermoregulation</subject><issn>0740-3194</issn><issn>1522-2594</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2017</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqNkc9qGzEQxkVJqV2nh7xAEOTSy8b6t5L2GEz-FGIKps11GWnlRkZaO6sVIbc-Qp6xTxLZSXroqacZZn7zwXwfQieUnFNC2DwO8ZxJJsQHNKU1YxWrG3GEpkQJUnHaiAn6nNKGENI0SnxCE6YoI4LwKcp3EHwHo-9_4ZTNxtnxz-_ntHPWr73FqysMfYfHezdECDj5mEOBt33Cvt-PsYWwxjEnGxzOaS-zXBUFA8mVOxd3boAxDw5HB6nU6PoxHaOPawjJfXmrM_Tz6vLH4qa6_X79bXFxW1mulahUzbW0lNfCdoIZoIYASKFrI7UyhiulJes4SC206qhiyjRSrAE6CqBZzWfo66vubtg-ZJfGNvpkXQjQu21OLdWaqppIJf8DZVIWPyUr6Nk_6Gabh748UihVN5LTA3X6RmUTXdfuBh9heGrfvS_A_BV49ME9_d1T0u5DbUuo7SHUdrlaHhr-AvKxlUc</recordid><startdate>201704</startdate><enddate>201704</enddate><creator>Simonis, F.F.J.</creator><creator>Raaijmakers, A.J.E.</creator><creator>Lagendijk, J.J.W.</creator><creator>van den Berg, C.A.T.</creator><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>M7Z</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>7QO</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201704</creationdate><title>Validating subject‐specific RF and thermal simulations in the calf muscle using MR‐based temperature measurements</title><author>Simonis, F.F.J. ; Raaijmakers, A.J.E. ; Lagendijk, J.J.W. ; van den Berg, C.A.T.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3874-75386c1354cd42ba1b0aa6485b687bb377862d3a68487d1727b964faad1aa8253</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2017</creationdate><topic>Body Temperature - physiology</topic><topic>EM modeling</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Image Interpretation, Computer-Assisted - methods</topic><topic>Leg</topic><topic>Magnetic Resonance Imaging - methods</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Models, Biological</topic><topic>Models, Statistical</topic><topic>Muscle, Skeletal - anatomy & histology</topic><topic>Muscle, Skeletal - physiology</topic><topic>Radio Waves</topic><topic>Reproducibility of Results</topic><topic>RF safety</topic><topic>SAR</topic><topic>Sensitivity and Specificity</topic><topic>Temperature</topic><topic>thermal modeling</topic><topic>Thermography - methods</topic><topic>thermoregulation</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Simonis, F.F.J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Raaijmakers, A.J.E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lagendijk, J.J.W.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>van den Berg, C.A.T.</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Biochemistry Abstracts 1</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>Biotechnology Research Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Magnetic resonance in medicine</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Simonis, F.F.J.</au><au>Raaijmakers, A.J.E.</au><au>Lagendijk, J.J.W.</au><au>van den Berg, C.A.T.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Validating subject‐specific RF and thermal simulations in the calf muscle using MR‐based temperature measurements</atitle><jtitle>Magnetic resonance in medicine</jtitle><addtitle>Magn Reson Med</addtitle><date>2017-04</date><risdate>2017</risdate><volume>77</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>1691</spage><epage>1700</epage><pages>1691-1700</pages><issn>0740-3194</issn><eissn>1522-2594</eissn><coden>MRMEEN</coden><abstract>Purpose
Ongoing discussions occur to translate the safety restrictions on MR scanners from specific absorption rate (SAR) to thermal dose. Therefore, this research focuses on the accuracy of thermal simulations in human subjects during an MR exam, which is fundamental information in that debate.
Methods
Radiofrequency (RF) heating experiments were performed on the calves of 13 healthy subjects using a dedicated transmit‐receive coil while monitoring the temperature with proton resonance frequency shift (PRFS) thermometry. Subject‐specific models and one generic model were used for electromagnetic and thermal simulations using Pennes' bioheat equation, with the blood equilibration constant equaling zero. The simulations were subsequently compared with the experimental results.
Results
The mean
B1+ equaled 15 µT in the center slice of all volunteers, and 95% of the voxels had errors smaller than 2.8 µT between the simulation and measurement. The intersubject variation in RF power to achieve the required
B1+ was 11%. The resulting intersubject variation in median temperature rise was 14%. Thermal simulations underestimated the median temperature increase on average, with 34% in subject‐specific models and 28% in the generic model.
Conclusions
Although thermal measures are directly coupled to tissue damage and therefore suitable for RF safety assessment, insecurities in the applied thermal modeling limit their estimation accuracy. Magn Reson Med 77:1691–1700, 2017. © 2016 International Society for Magnetic Resonance in Medicine</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</pub><pmid>27120403</pmid><doi>10.1002/mrm.26244</doi><tpages>10</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0740-3194 |
ispartof | Magnetic resonance in medicine, 2017-04, Vol.77 (4), p.1691-1700 |
issn | 0740-3194 1522-2594 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1881750676 |
source | MEDLINE; Access via Wiley Online Library; Wiley Online Library (Open Access Collection) |
subjects | Body Temperature - physiology EM modeling Female Humans Image Interpretation, Computer-Assisted - methods Leg Magnetic Resonance Imaging - methods Male Models, Biological Models, Statistical Muscle, Skeletal - anatomy & histology Muscle, Skeletal - physiology Radio Waves Reproducibility of Results RF safety SAR Sensitivity and Specificity Temperature thermal modeling Thermography - methods thermoregulation |
title | Validating subject‐specific RF and thermal simulations in the calf muscle using MR‐based temperature measurements |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-19T00%3A10%3A25IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Validating%20subject%E2%80%90specific%20RF%20and%20thermal%20simulations%20in%20the%20calf%20muscle%20using%20MR%E2%80%90based%20temperature%20measurements&rft.jtitle=Magnetic%20resonance%20in%20medicine&rft.au=Simonis,%20F.F.J.&rft.date=2017-04&rft.volume=77&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=1691&rft.epage=1700&rft.pages=1691-1700&rft.issn=0740-3194&rft.eissn=1522-2594&rft.coden=MRMEEN&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002/mrm.26244&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E1881750676%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1875963162&rft_id=info:pmid/27120403&rfr_iscdi=true |