Pasture flock chicken cecal microbiome responses to prebiotics and plum fiber feed amendments

When prebiotics and other fermentation substrates are delivered to animals as feed supplements, the typical goal is to improve weight gain and feed conversion. In this work, we examined pasture flock chicken cecal contents using next generation sequencing (NGS) to identify and understand the composi...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Poultry science 2017-06, Vol.96 (6), p.1820-1830
Hauptverfasser: Park, S H, Perrotta, A, Hanning, I, Diaz-Sanchez, S, Pendleton, S, Alm, E, Ricke, S C
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 1830
container_issue 6
container_start_page 1820
container_title Poultry science
container_volume 96
creator Park, S H
Perrotta, A
Hanning, I
Diaz-Sanchez, S
Pendleton, S
Alm, E
Ricke, S C
description When prebiotics and other fermentation substrates are delivered to animals as feed supplements, the typical goal is to improve weight gain and feed conversion. In this work, we examined pasture flock chicken cecal contents using next generation sequencing (NGS) to identify and understand the composition of the microbiome when prebiotics and fermentation substrates were supplemented. We generated 16S rRNA sequencing data for 120 separate cecal samples from groups of chickens receiving one of 3 prebiotics or fiber feed additives. The data indicated that respective feed additives enrich for specific bacterial community members and modulate the diversity of the microbiome. We applied synthetic learning in microbial ecology (SLiME) analysis to interpret 16S rRNA microbial community data and identify specific bacterial operational taxonomic units (OTU) that are predictive of the particular feed additives used in these experiments. The results suggest that feed can influence microbiome composition in a predictable way, and thus diet may have indirect effects on weight gain and feed conversion through the microbiome.
doi_str_mv 10.3382/ps/pew441
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1881269454</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1881269454</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c360t-5def4d15388eb0c6ca071f4398e560e6d220bec2cc9b9ab50f03bd5bca9075fb3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNo9kEtLxDAUhYMoOo4u_AOSpS7q5NG0zVLEFwzoQpdS8rjBOn3E3Bbx31uZ0cXlwOXjwPkIOePsSspKrCKuInzlOd8jC66EyiQv-T5ZMCZFpkrNj8gx4gdjghdFeUiORCWl1nmxIG_PBscpAQ3t4DbUvTduAz114ExLu8alwTZDBzQBxqFHQDoONCaYv2PjkJre09hOHQ2NhUQDgKemg97PN-IJOQimRTjd5ZK83t2-3Dxk66f7x5vrdeZkwcZMeQi550pWFVjmCmdYyUMudQWqYFB4IZgFJ5zTVhurWGDSemWd0axUwcoludj2xjR8ToBj3TXooG1ND8OENa8qLgqdq3xGL7foPA0xQahjajqTvmvO6l-bdcR6a3Nmz3e1k-3A_5N_-uQPZ0Vyqg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1881269454</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Pasture flock chicken cecal microbiome responses to prebiotics and plum fiber feed amendments</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><source>PubMed Central</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Park, S H ; Perrotta, A ; Hanning, I ; Diaz-Sanchez, S ; Pendleton, S ; Alm, E ; Ricke, S C</creator><creatorcontrib>Park, S H ; Perrotta, A ; Hanning, I ; Diaz-Sanchez, S ; Pendleton, S ; Alm, E ; Ricke, S C</creatorcontrib><description>When prebiotics and other fermentation substrates are delivered to animals as feed supplements, the typical goal is to improve weight gain and feed conversion. In this work, we examined pasture flock chicken cecal contents using next generation sequencing (NGS) to identify and understand the composition of the microbiome when prebiotics and fermentation substrates were supplemented. We generated 16S rRNA sequencing data for 120 separate cecal samples from groups of chickens receiving one of 3 prebiotics or fiber feed additives. The data indicated that respective feed additives enrich for specific bacterial community members and modulate the diversity of the microbiome. We applied synthetic learning in microbial ecology (SLiME) analysis to interpret 16S rRNA microbial community data and identify specific bacterial operational taxonomic units (OTU) that are predictive of the particular feed additives used in these experiments. The results suggest that feed can influence microbiome composition in a predictable way, and thus diet may have indirect effects on weight gain and feed conversion through the microbiome.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0032-5791</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1525-3171</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.3382/ps/pew441</identifier><identifier>PMID: 28339946</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England</publisher><subject>Animal Feed - analysis ; Animals ; Bacteria - genetics ; Bacteria - isolation &amp; purification ; Cecum - microbiology ; Chickens - microbiology ; Diet - veterinary ; Dietary Fiber - administration &amp; dosage ; Dietary Supplements ; Microbiota ; Oligosaccharides - administration &amp; dosage ; Oligosaccharides - pharmacology ; Prebiotics - administration &amp; dosage ; Prunus domestica ; RNA, Ribosomal, 16S - genetics ; Sequence Analysis, DNA</subject><ispartof>Poultry science, 2017-06, Vol.96 (6), p.1820-1830</ispartof><rights>2017 Poultry Science Association Inc.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c360t-5def4d15388eb0c6ca071f4398e560e6d220bec2cc9b9ab50f03bd5bca9075fb3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c360t-5def4d15388eb0c6ca071f4398e560e6d220bec2cc9b9ab50f03bd5bca9075fb3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28339946$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Park, S H</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Perrotta, A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hanning, I</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Diaz-Sanchez, S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pendleton, S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Alm, E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ricke, S C</creatorcontrib><title>Pasture flock chicken cecal microbiome responses to prebiotics and plum fiber feed amendments</title><title>Poultry science</title><addtitle>Poult Sci</addtitle><description>When prebiotics and other fermentation substrates are delivered to animals as feed supplements, the typical goal is to improve weight gain and feed conversion. In this work, we examined pasture flock chicken cecal contents using next generation sequencing (NGS) to identify and understand the composition of the microbiome when prebiotics and fermentation substrates were supplemented. We generated 16S rRNA sequencing data for 120 separate cecal samples from groups of chickens receiving one of 3 prebiotics or fiber feed additives. The data indicated that respective feed additives enrich for specific bacterial community members and modulate the diversity of the microbiome. We applied synthetic learning in microbial ecology (SLiME) analysis to interpret 16S rRNA microbial community data and identify specific bacterial operational taxonomic units (OTU) that are predictive of the particular feed additives used in these experiments. The results suggest that feed can influence microbiome composition in a predictable way, and thus diet may have indirect effects on weight gain and feed conversion through the microbiome.</description><subject>Animal Feed - analysis</subject><subject>Animals</subject><subject>Bacteria - genetics</subject><subject>Bacteria - isolation &amp; purification</subject><subject>Cecum - microbiology</subject><subject>Chickens - microbiology</subject><subject>Diet - veterinary</subject><subject>Dietary Fiber - administration &amp; dosage</subject><subject>Dietary Supplements</subject><subject>Microbiota</subject><subject>Oligosaccharides - administration &amp; dosage</subject><subject>Oligosaccharides - pharmacology</subject><subject>Prebiotics - administration &amp; dosage</subject><subject>Prunus domestica</subject><subject>RNA, Ribosomal, 16S - genetics</subject><subject>Sequence Analysis, DNA</subject><issn>0032-5791</issn><issn>1525-3171</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2017</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNo9kEtLxDAUhYMoOo4u_AOSpS7q5NG0zVLEFwzoQpdS8rjBOn3E3Bbx31uZ0cXlwOXjwPkIOePsSspKrCKuInzlOd8jC66EyiQv-T5ZMCZFpkrNj8gx4gdjghdFeUiORCWl1nmxIG_PBscpAQ3t4DbUvTduAz114ExLu8alwTZDBzQBxqFHQDoONCaYv2PjkJre09hOHQ2NhUQDgKemg97PN-IJOQimRTjd5ZK83t2-3Dxk66f7x5vrdeZkwcZMeQi550pWFVjmCmdYyUMudQWqYFB4IZgFJ5zTVhurWGDSemWd0axUwcoludj2xjR8ToBj3TXooG1ND8OENa8qLgqdq3xGL7foPA0xQahjajqTvmvO6l-bdcR6a3Nmz3e1k-3A_5N_-uQPZ0Vyqg</recordid><startdate>20170601</startdate><enddate>20170601</enddate><creator>Park, S H</creator><creator>Perrotta, A</creator><creator>Hanning, I</creator><creator>Diaz-Sanchez, S</creator><creator>Pendleton, S</creator><creator>Alm, E</creator><creator>Ricke, S C</creator><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20170601</creationdate><title>Pasture flock chicken cecal microbiome responses to prebiotics and plum fiber feed amendments</title><author>Park, S H ; Perrotta, A ; Hanning, I ; Diaz-Sanchez, S ; Pendleton, S ; Alm, E ; Ricke, S C</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c360t-5def4d15388eb0c6ca071f4398e560e6d220bec2cc9b9ab50f03bd5bca9075fb3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2017</creationdate><topic>Animal Feed - analysis</topic><topic>Animals</topic><topic>Bacteria - genetics</topic><topic>Bacteria - isolation &amp; purification</topic><topic>Cecum - microbiology</topic><topic>Chickens - microbiology</topic><topic>Diet - veterinary</topic><topic>Dietary Fiber - administration &amp; dosage</topic><topic>Dietary Supplements</topic><topic>Microbiota</topic><topic>Oligosaccharides - administration &amp; dosage</topic><topic>Oligosaccharides - pharmacology</topic><topic>Prebiotics - administration &amp; dosage</topic><topic>Prunus domestica</topic><topic>RNA, Ribosomal, 16S - genetics</topic><topic>Sequence Analysis, DNA</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Park, S H</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Perrotta, A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hanning, I</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Diaz-Sanchez, S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pendleton, S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Alm, E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ricke, S C</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Poultry science</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Park, S H</au><au>Perrotta, A</au><au>Hanning, I</au><au>Diaz-Sanchez, S</au><au>Pendleton, S</au><au>Alm, E</au><au>Ricke, S C</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Pasture flock chicken cecal microbiome responses to prebiotics and plum fiber feed amendments</atitle><jtitle>Poultry science</jtitle><addtitle>Poult Sci</addtitle><date>2017-06-01</date><risdate>2017</risdate><volume>96</volume><issue>6</issue><spage>1820</spage><epage>1830</epage><pages>1820-1830</pages><issn>0032-5791</issn><eissn>1525-3171</eissn><abstract>When prebiotics and other fermentation substrates are delivered to animals as feed supplements, the typical goal is to improve weight gain and feed conversion. In this work, we examined pasture flock chicken cecal contents using next generation sequencing (NGS) to identify and understand the composition of the microbiome when prebiotics and fermentation substrates were supplemented. We generated 16S rRNA sequencing data for 120 separate cecal samples from groups of chickens receiving one of 3 prebiotics or fiber feed additives. The data indicated that respective feed additives enrich for specific bacterial community members and modulate the diversity of the microbiome. We applied synthetic learning in microbial ecology (SLiME) analysis to interpret 16S rRNA microbial community data and identify specific bacterial operational taxonomic units (OTU) that are predictive of the particular feed additives used in these experiments. The results suggest that feed can influence microbiome composition in a predictable way, and thus diet may have indirect effects on weight gain and feed conversion through the microbiome.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pmid>28339946</pmid><doi>10.3382/ps/pew441</doi><tpages>11</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0032-5791
ispartof Poultry science, 2017-06, Vol.96 (6), p.1820-1830
issn 0032-5791
1525-3171
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1881269454
source MEDLINE; Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals; PubMed Central; Alma/SFX Local Collection
subjects Animal Feed - analysis
Animals
Bacteria - genetics
Bacteria - isolation & purification
Cecum - microbiology
Chickens - microbiology
Diet - veterinary
Dietary Fiber - administration & dosage
Dietary Supplements
Microbiota
Oligosaccharides - administration & dosage
Oligosaccharides - pharmacology
Prebiotics - administration & dosage
Prunus domestica
RNA, Ribosomal, 16S - genetics
Sequence Analysis, DNA
title Pasture flock chicken cecal microbiome responses to prebiotics and plum fiber feed amendments
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-18T22%3A42%3A19IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Pasture%20flock%20chicken%20cecal%20microbiome%20responses%20to%20prebiotics%20and%20plum%20fiber%20feed%20amendments&rft.jtitle=Poultry%20science&rft.au=Park,%20S%20H&rft.date=2017-06-01&rft.volume=96&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=1820&rft.epage=1830&rft.pages=1820-1830&rft.issn=0032-5791&rft.eissn=1525-3171&rft_id=info:doi/10.3382/ps/pew441&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1881269454%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1881269454&rft_id=info:pmid/28339946&rfr_iscdi=true