Pasture flock chicken cecal microbiome responses to prebiotics and plum fiber feed amendments
When prebiotics and other fermentation substrates are delivered to animals as feed supplements, the typical goal is to improve weight gain and feed conversion. In this work, we examined pasture flock chicken cecal contents using next generation sequencing (NGS) to identify and understand the composi...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Poultry science 2017-06, Vol.96 (6), p.1820-1830 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 1830 |
---|---|
container_issue | 6 |
container_start_page | 1820 |
container_title | Poultry science |
container_volume | 96 |
creator | Park, S H Perrotta, A Hanning, I Diaz-Sanchez, S Pendleton, S Alm, E Ricke, S C |
description | When prebiotics and other fermentation substrates are delivered to animals as feed supplements, the typical goal is to improve weight gain and feed conversion. In this work, we examined pasture flock chicken cecal contents using next generation sequencing (NGS) to identify and understand the composition of the microbiome when prebiotics and fermentation substrates were supplemented. We generated 16S rRNA sequencing data for 120 separate cecal samples from groups of chickens receiving one of 3 prebiotics or fiber feed additives. The data indicated that respective feed additives enrich for specific bacterial community members and modulate the diversity of the microbiome. We applied synthetic learning in microbial ecology (SLiME) analysis to interpret 16S rRNA microbial community data and identify specific bacterial operational taxonomic units (OTU) that are predictive of the particular feed additives used in these experiments. The results suggest that feed can influence microbiome composition in a predictable way, and thus diet may have indirect effects on weight gain and feed conversion through the microbiome. |
doi_str_mv | 10.3382/ps/pew441 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1881269454</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1881269454</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c360t-5def4d15388eb0c6ca071f4398e560e6d220bec2cc9b9ab50f03bd5bca9075fb3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNo9kEtLxDAUhYMoOo4u_AOSpS7q5NG0zVLEFwzoQpdS8rjBOn3E3Bbx31uZ0cXlwOXjwPkIOePsSspKrCKuInzlOd8jC66EyiQv-T5ZMCZFpkrNj8gx4gdjghdFeUiORCWl1nmxIG_PBscpAQ3t4DbUvTduAz114ExLu8alwTZDBzQBxqFHQDoONCaYv2PjkJre09hOHQ2NhUQDgKemg97PN-IJOQimRTjd5ZK83t2-3Dxk66f7x5vrdeZkwcZMeQi550pWFVjmCmdYyUMudQWqYFB4IZgFJ5zTVhurWGDSemWd0axUwcoludj2xjR8ToBj3TXooG1ND8OENa8qLgqdq3xGL7foPA0xQahjajqTvmvO6l-bdcR6a3Nmz3e1k-3A_5N_-uQPZ0Vyqg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1881269454</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Pasture flock chicken cecal microbiome responses to prebiotics and plum fiber feed amendments</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><source>PubMed Central</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Park, S H ; Perrotta, A ; Hanning, I ; Diaz-Sanchez, S ; Pendleton, S ; Alm, E ; Ricke, S C</creator><creatorcontrib>Park, S H ; Perrotta, A ; Hanning, I ; Diaz-Sanchez, S ; Pendleton, S ; Alm, E ; Ricke, S C</creatorcontrib><description>When prebiotics and other fermentation substrates are delivered to animals as feed supplements, the typical goal is to improve weight gain and feed conversion. In this work, we examined pasture flock chicken cecal contents using next generation sequencing (NGS) to identify and understand the composition of the microbiome when prebiotics and fermentation substrates were supplemented. We generated 16S rRNA sequencing data for 120 separate cecal samples from groups of chickens receiving one of 3 prebiotics or fiber feed additives. The data indicated that respective feed additives enrich for specific bacterial community members and modulate the diversity of the microbiome. We applied synthetic learning in microbial ecology (SLiME) analysis to interpret 16S rRNA microbial community data and identify specific bacterial operational taxonomic units (OTU) that are predictive of the particular feed additives used in these experiments. The results suggest that feed can influence microbiome composition in a predictable way, and thus diet may have indirect effects on weight gain and feed conversion through the microbiome.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0032-5791</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1525-3171</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.3382/ps/pew441</identifier><identifier>PMID: 28339946</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England</publisher><subject>Animal Feed - analysis ; Animals ; Bacteria - genetics ; Bacteria - isolation & purification ; Cecum - microbiology ; Chickens - microbiology ; Diet - veterinary ; Dietary Fiber - administration & dosage ; Dietary Supplements ; Microbiota ; Oligosaccharides - administration & dosage ; Oligosaccharides - pharmacology ; Prebiotics - administration & dosage ; Prunus domestica ; RNA, Ribosomal, 16S - genetics ; Sequence Analysis, DNA</subject><ispartof>Poultry science, 2017-06, Vol.96 (6), p.1820-1830</ispartof><rights>2017 Poultry Science Association Inc.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c360t-5def4d15388eb0c6ca071f4398e560e6d220bec2cc9b9ab50f03bd5bca9075fb3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c360t-5def4d15388eb0c6ca071f4398e560e6d220bec2cc9b9ab50f03bd5bca9075fb3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28339946$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Park, S H</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Perrotta, A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hanning, I</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Diaz-Sanchez, S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pendleton, S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Alm, E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ricke, S C</creatorcontrib><title>Pasture flock chicken cecal microbiome responses to prebiotics and plum fiber feed amendments</title><title>Poultry science</title><addtitle>Poult Sci</addtitle><description>When prebiotics and other fermentation substrates are delivered to animals as feed supplements, the typical goal is to improve weight gain and feed conversion. In this work, we examined pasture flock chicken cecal contents using next generation sequencing (NGS) to identify and understand the composition of the microbiome when prebiotics and fermentation substrates were supplemented. We generated 16S rRNA sequencing data for 120 separate cecal samples from groups of chickens receiving one of 3 prebiotics or fiber feed additives. The data indicated that respective feed additives enrich for specific bacterial community members and modulate the diversity of the microbiome. We applied synthetic learning in microbial ecology (SLiME) analysis to interpret 16S rRNA microbial community data and identify specific bacterial operational taxonomic units (OTU) that are predictive of the particular feed additives used in these experiments. The results suggest that feed can influence microbiome composition in a predictable way, and thus diet may have indirect effects on weight gain and feed conversion through the microbiome.</description><subject>Animal Feed - analysis</subject><subject>Animals</subject><subject>Bacteria - genetics</subject><subject>Bacteria - isolation & purification</subject><subject>Cecum - microbiology</subject><subject>Chickens - microbiology</subject><subject>Diet - veterinary</subject><subject>Dietary Fiber - administration & dosage</subject><subject>Dietary Supplements</subject><subject>Microbiota</subject><subject>Oligosaccharides - administration & dosage</subject><subject>Oligosaccharides - pharmacology</subject><subject>Prebiotics - administration & dosage</subject><subject>Prunus domestica</subject><subject>RNA, Ribosomal, 16S - genetics</subject><subject>Sequence Analysis, DNA</subject><issn>0032-5791</issn><issn>1525-3171</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2017</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNo9kEtLxDAUhYMoOo4u_AOSpS7q5NG0zVLEFwzoQpdS8rjBOn3E3Bbx31uZ0cXlwOXjwPkIOePsSspKrCKuInzlOd8jC66EyiQv-T5ZMCZFpkrNj8gx4gdjghdFeUiORCWl1nmxIG_PBscpAQ3t4DbUvTduAz114ExLu8alwTZDBzQBxqFHQDoONCaYv2PjkJre09hOHQ2NhUQDgKemg97PN-IJOQimRTjd5ZK83t2-3Dxk66f7x5vrdeZkwcZMeQi550pWFVjmCmdYyUMudQWqYFB4IZgFJ5zTVhurWGDSemWd0axUwcoludj2xjR8ToBj3TXooG1ND8OENa8qLgqdq3xGL7foPA0xQahjajqTvmvO6l-bdcR6a3Nmz3e1k-3A_5N_-uQPZ0Vyqg</recordid><startdate>20170601</startdate><enddate>20170601</enddate><creator>Park, S H</creator><creator>Perrotta, A</creator><creator>Hanning, I</creator><creator>Diaz-Sanchez, S</creator><creator>Pendleton, S</creator><creator>Alm, E</creator><creator>Ricke, S C</creator><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20170601</creationdate><title>Pasture flock chicken cecal microbiome responses to prebiotics and plum fiber feed amendments</title><author>Park, S H ; Perrotta, A ; Hanning, I ; Diaz-Sanchez, S ; Pendleton, S ; Alm, E ; Ricke, S C</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c360t-5def4d15388eb0c6ca071f4398e560e6d220bec2cc9b9ab50f03bd5bca9075fb3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2017</creationdate><topic>Animal Feed - analysis</topic><topic>Animals</topic><topic>Bacteria - genetics</topic><topic>Bacteria - isolation & purification</topic><topic>Cecum - microbiology</topic><topic>Chickens - microbiology</topic><topic>Diet - veterinary</topic><topic>Dietary Fiber - administration & dosage</topic><topic>Dietary Supplements</topic><topic>Microbiota</topic><topic>Oligosaccharides - administration & dosage</topic><topic>Oligosaccharides - pharmacology</topic><topic>Prebiotics - administration & dosage</topic><topic>Prunus domestica</topic><topic>RNA, Ribosomal, 16S - genetics</topic><topic>Sequence Analysis, DNA</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Park, S H</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Perrotta, A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hanning, I</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Diaz-Sanchez, S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pendleton, S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Alm, E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ricke, S C</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Poultry science</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Park, S H</au><au>Perrotta, A</au><au>Hanning, I</au><au>Diaz-Sanchez, S</au><au>Pendleton, S</au><au>Alm, E</au><au>Ricke, S C</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Pasture flock chicken cecal microbiome responses to prebiotics and plum fiber feed amendments</atitle><jtitle>Poultry science</jtitle><addtitle>Poult Sci</addtitle><date>2017-06-01</date><risdate>2017</risdate><volume>96</volume><issue>6</issue><spage>1820</spage><epage>1830</epage><pages>1820-1830</pages><issn>0032-5791</issn><eissn>1525-3171</eissn><abstract>When prebiotics and other fermentation substrates are delivered to animals as feed supplements, the typical goal is to improve weight gain and feed conversion. In this work, we examined pasture flock chicken cecal contents using next generation sequencing (NGS) to identify and understand the composition of the microbiome when prebiotics and fermentation substrates were supplemented. We generated 16S rRNA sequencing data for 120 separate cecal samples from groups of chickens receiving one of 3 prebiotics or fiber feed additives. The data indicated that respective feed additives enrich for specific bacterial community members and modulate the diversity of the microbiome. We applied synthetic learning in microbial ecology (SLiME) analysis to interpret 16S rRNA microbial community data and identify specific bacterial operational taxonomic units (OTU) that are predictive of the particular feed additives used in these experiments. The results suggest that feed can influence microbiome composition in a predictable way, and thus diet may have indirect effects on weight gain and feed conversion through the microbiome.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pmid>28339946</pmid><doi>10.3382/ps/pew441</doi><tpages>11</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0032-5791 |
ispartof | Poultry science, 2017-06, Vol.96 (6), p.1820-1830 |
issn | 0032-5791 1525-3171 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1881269454 |
source | MEDLINE; Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals; PubMed Central; Alma/SFX Local Collection |
subjects | Animal Feed - analysis Animals Bacteria - genetics Bacteria - isolation & purification Cecum - microbiology Chickens - microbiology Diet - veterinary Dietary Fiber - administration & dosage Dietary Supplements Microbiota Oligosaccharides - administration & dosage Oligosaccharides - pharmacology Prebiotics - administration & dosage Prunus domestica RNA, Ribosomal, 16S - genetics Sequence Analysis, DNA |
title | Pasture flock chicken cecal microbiome responses to prebiotics and plum fiber feed amendments |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-18T22%3A42%3A19IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Pasture%20flock%20chicken%20cecal%20microbiome%20responses%20to%20prebiotics%20and%20plum%20fiber%20feed%20amendments&rft.jtitle=Poultry%20science&rft.au=Park,%20S%20H&rft.date=2017-06-01&rft.volume=96&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=1820&rft.epage=1830&rft.pages=1820-1830&rft.issn=0032-5791&rft.eissn=1525-3171&rft_id=info:doi/10.3382/ps/pew441&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1881269454%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1881269454&rft_id=info:pmid/28339946&rfr_iscdi=true |