Neural evidence that inhibition is linked to the affective devaluation of distractors that match the contents of working memory

Stimuli appearing as visual distractors subsequently receive more negative affective evaluations than novel items or prior targets of attention. Leading accounts question whether this distractor devaluation effect occurs through evaluative codes that become associated with distractors as a mere arte...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Neuropsychologia 2017-05, Vol.99, p.259-269
Hauptverfasser: De Vito, David, Al-Aidroos, Naseem, Fenske, Mark J.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 269
container_issue
container_start_page 259
container_title Neuropsychologia
container_volume 99
creator De Vito, David
Al-Aidroos, Naseem
Fenske, Mark J.
description Stimuli appearing as visual distractors subsequently receive more negative affective evaluations than novel items or prior targets of attention. Leading accounts question whether this distractor devaluation effect occurs through evaluative codes that become associated with distractors as a mere artefact of attention-task instructions, or through affective consequences of attentional inhibition when applied to prevent distractor interference. Here we test opposing predictions arising from the evaluative-coding and devaluation-by-inhibition hypotheses using an electrophysiological marker of attentional inhibition in a task that requires participants to avoid interference from abstract-shape distractors presented while maintaining a uniquely-colored stimulus in memory. Consistent with prior research, distractors that matched the colour of the stimulus being held in memory elicited a Pd component of the event-related potential waveform, indicating that their processing was being actively suppressed. Subsequent affective evaluations revealed that memory-matching distractors also received more negative ratings than non-matching distractors or previously-unseen shapes. Moreover, Pd magnitude was greater on trials in which the memory-matching distractors were later rated negatively than on trials preceding positive ratings. These results support the devaluation-by-inhibition hypothesis and strongly suggest that fluctuations in stimulus inhibition are closely associated with subsequent affective evaluations. In contrast, none of the evaluative-coding based predictions were confirmed. •Test competing hypotheses about how visual distractors become affectively devalued.•Recorded event-related potentials to distractors during visual-memory maintenance.•ERP index of distractor suppression (Pd component) linked to later stimulus ratings.•Results confirm predictions from devaluation-by-inhibition hypothesis.•Findings fail to confirm predictions from evaluative-coding hypothesis.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2017.03.022
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1881269035</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0028393217301021</els_id><sourcerecordid>1881269035</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c392t-6b901de266605fff4fd6db8f95b26e027b0c7e0b15d89ca06a69281ac5245cd83</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkUFv1DAQhS1ERZfCX0A-IS4JYzvxOhckVAFFqtpLOVuOPe56m8SL7Wy1J_462W7hwInTHOZ7bzTvEfKeQc2AyY_besI5xV0-2E0c4n0wNQe2rkHUwPkLsmJqLSrRsuYlWQFwVYlO8HPyOuctADQtV6_IOVeiYUywFfl1s9iZgeI-OJws0rIxhYZpE_pQQpxoyHQI0wM6WuKyRGq8R1vCHqnDvRlm84RFT13IJRlbYsonl9EUu3nS2DgVnEo-Yo8xPYTpno44xnR4Q868GTK-fZ4X5MfXL3eXV9X17bfvl5-vKys6XirZd8AccikltN77xjvpeuW7tucSga97sGuEnrVOddaANLLjihnb8qa1TokL8uHku0vx54y56DFki8NgJoxz1kwpxmUHol3QTyfUpphzQq93KYwmHTQDfSxBb_W_JehjCRqEXkpYDN4935r7Ed1f-Z_UF-DqBODy8T5g0tmGY_oupCVb7WL431u_AZsnpms</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1881269035</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Neural evidence that inhibition is linked to the affective devaluation of distractors that match the contents of working memory</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>ScienceDirect Journals (5 years ago - present)</source><creator>De Vito, David ; Al-Aidroos, Naseem ; Fenske, Mark J.</creator><creatorcontrib>De Vito, David ; Al-Aidroos, Naseem ; Fenske, Mark J.</creatorcontrib><description>Stimuli appearing as visual distractors subsequently receive more negative affective evaluations than novel items or prior targets of attention. Leading accounts question whether this distractor devaluation effect occurs through evaluative codes that become associated with distractors as a mere artefact of attention-task instructions, or through affective consequences of attentional inhibition when applied to prevent distractor interference. Here we test opposing predictions arising from the evaluative-coding and devaluation-by-inhibition hypotheses using an electrophysiological marker of attentional inhibition in a task that requires participants to avoid interference from abstract-shape distractors presented while maintaining a uniquely-colored stimulus in memory. Consistent with prior research, distractors that matched the colour of the stimulus being held in memory elicited a Pd component of the event-related potential waveform, indicating that their processing was being actively suppressed. Subsequent affective evaluations revealed that memory-matching distractors also received more negative ratings than non-matching distractors or previously-unseen shapes. Moreover, Pd magnitude was greater on trials in which the memory-matching distractors were later rated negatively than on trials preceding positive ratings. These results support the devaluation-by-inhibition hypothesis and strongly suggest that fluctuations in stimulus inhibition are closely associated with subsequent affective evaluations. In contrast, none of the evaluative-coding based predictions were confirmed. •Test competing hypotheses about how visual distractors become affectively devalued.•Recorded event-related potentials to distractors during visual-memory maintenance.•ERP index of distractor suppression (Pd component) linked to later stimulus ratings.•Results confirm predictions from devaluation-by-inhibition hypothesis.•Findings fail to confirm predictions from evaluative-coding hypothesis.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0028-3932</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1873-3514</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2017.03.022</identifier><identifier>PMID: 28341131</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>Adolescent ; Affect - physiology ; Affective evaluation ; Attentional inhibition ; Brain - physiology ; Devaluation-by-inhibition ; Distractor devaluation ; EEG/ERP ; Electroencephalography ; Evaluative codes ; Evoked Potentials ; Female ; Humans ; Inhibition (Psychology) ; Male ; Memory, Short-Term - physiology ; Models, Psychological ; Neuropsychological Tests ; Pd component ; Visual Perception - physiology ; Working memory ; Young Adult</subject><ispartof>Neuropsychologia, 2017-05, Vol.99, p.259-269</ispartof><rights>2017 Elsevier Ltd</rights><rights>Copyright © 2017 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c392t-6b901de266605fff4fd6db8f95b26e027b0c7e0b15d89ca06a69281ac5245cd83</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c392t-6b901de266605fff4fd6db8f95b26e027b0c7e0b15d89ca06a69281ac5245cd83</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0028393217301021$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,3537,27901,27902,65306</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28341131$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>De Vito, David</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Al-Aidroos, Naseem</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fenske, Mark J.</creatorcontrib><title>Neural evidence that inhibition is linked to the affective devaluation of distractors that match the contents of working memory</title><title>Neuropsychologia</title><addtitle>Neuropsychologia</addtitle><description>Stimuli appearing as visual distractors subsequently receive more negative affective evaluations than novel items or prior targets of attention. Leading accounts question whether this distractor devaluation effect occurs through evaluative codes that become associated with distractors as a mere artefact of attention-task instructions, or through affective consequences of attentional inhibition when applied to prevent distractor interference. Here we test opposing predictions arising from the evaluative-coding and devaluation-by-inhibition hypotheses using an electrophysiological marker of attentional inhibition in a task that requires participants to avoid interference from abstract-shape distractors presented while maintaining a uniquely-colored stimulus in memory. Consistent with prior research, distractors that matched the colour of the stimulus being held in memory elicited a Pd component of the event-related potential waveform, indicating that their processing was being actively suppressed. Subsequent affective evaluations revealed that memory-matching distractors also received more negative ratings than non-matching distractors or previously-unseen shapes. Moreover, Pd magnitude was greater on trials in which the memory-matching distractors were later rated negatively than on trials preceding positive ratings. These results support the devaluation-by-inhibition hypothesis and strongly suggest that fluctuations in stimulus inhibition are closely associated with subsequent affective evaluations. In contrast, none of the evaluative-coding based predictions were confirmed. •Test competing hypotheses about how visual distractors become affectively devalued.•Recorded event-related potentials to distractors during visual-memory maintenance.•ERP index of distractor suppression (Pd component) linked to later stimulus ratings.•Results confirm predictions from devaluation-by-inhibition hypothesis.•Findings fail to confirm predictions from evaluative-coding hypothesis.</description><subject>Adolescent</subject><subject>Affect - physiology</subject><subject>Affective evaluation</subject><subject>Attentional inhibition</subject><subject>Brain - physiology</subject><subject>Devaluation-by-inhibition</subject><subject>Distractor devaluation</subject><subject>EEG/ERP</subject><subject>Electroencephalography</subject><subject>Evaluative codes</subject><subject>Evoked Potentials</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Inhibition (Psychology)</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Memory, Short-Term - physiology</subject><subject>Models, Psychological</subject><subject>Neuropsychological Tests</subject><subject>Pd component</subject><subject>Visual Perception - physiology</subject><subject>Working memory</subject><subject>Young Adult</subject><issn>0028-3932</issn><issn>1873-3514</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2017</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqNkUFv1DAQhS1ERZfCX0A-IS4JYzvxOhckVAFFqtpLOVuOPe56m8SL7Wy1J_462W7hwInTHOZ7bzTvEfKeQc2AyY_besI5xV0-2E0c4n0wNQe2rkHUwPkLsmJqLSrRsuYlWQFwVYlO8HPyOuctADQtV6_IOVeiYUywFfl1s9iZgeI-OJws0rIxhYZpE_pQQpxoyHQI0wM6WuKyRGq8R1vCHqnDvRlm84RFT13IJRlbYsonl9EUu3nS2DgVnEo-Yo8xPYTpno44xnR4Q868GTK-fZ4X5MfXL3eXV9X17bfvl5-vKys6XirZd8AccikltN77xjvpeuW7tucSga97sGuEnrVOddaANLLjihnb8qa1TokL8uHku0vx54y56DFki8NgJoxz1kwpxmUHol3QTyfUpphzQq93KYwmHTQDfSxBb_W_JehjCRqEXkpYDN4935r7Ed1f-Z_UF-DqBODy8T5g0tmGY_oupCVb7WL431u_AZsnpms</recordid><startdate>201705</startdate><enddate>201705</enddate><creator>De Vito, David</creator><creator>Al-Aidroos, Naseem</creator><creator>Fenske, Mark J.</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201705</creationdate><title>Neural evidence that inhibition is linked to the affective devaluation of distractors that match the contents of working memory</title><author>De Vito, David ; Al-Aidroos, Naseem ; Fenske, Mark J.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c392t-6b901de266605fff4fd6db8f95b26e027b0c7e0b15d89ca06a69281ac5245cd83</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2017</creationdate><topic>Adolescent</topic><topic>Affect - physiology</topic><topic>Affective evaluation</topic><topic>Attentional inhibition</topic><topic>Brain - physiology</topic><topic>Devaluation-by-inhibition</topic><topic>Distractor devaluation</topic><topic>EEG/ERP</topic><topic>Electroencephalography</topic><topic>Evaluative codes</topic><topic>Evoked Potentials</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Inhibition (Psychology)</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Memory, Short-Term - physiology</topic><topic>Models, Psychological</topic><topic>Neuropsychological Tests</topic><topic>Pd component</topic><topic>Visual Perception - physiology</topic><topic>Working memory</topic><topic>Young Adult</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>De Vito, David</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Al-Aidroos, Naseem</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fenske, Mark J.</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Neuropsychologia</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>De Vito, David</au><au>Al-Aidroos, Naseem</au><au>Fenske, Mark J.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Neural evidence that inhibition is linked to the affective devaluation of distractors that match the contents of working memory</atitle><jtitle>Neuropsychologia</jtitle><addtitle>Neuropsychologia</addtitle><date>2017-05</date><risdate>2017</risdate><volume>99</volume><spage>259</spage><epage>269</epage><pages>259-269</pages><issn>0028-3932</issn><eissn>1873-3514</eissn><abstract>Stimuli appearing as visual distractors subsequently receive more negative affective evaluations than novel items or prior targets of attention. Leading accounts question whether this distractor devaluation effect occurs through evaluative codes that become associated with distractors as a mere artefact of attention-task instructions, or through affective consequences of attentional inhibition when applied to prevent distractor interference. Here we test opposing predictions arising from the evaluative-coding and devaluation-by-inhibition hypotheses using an electrophysiological marker of attentional inhibition in a task that requires participants to avoid interference from abstract-shape distractors presented while maintaining a uniquely-colored stimulus in memory. Consistent with prior research, distractors that matched the colour of the stimulus being held in memory elicited a Pd component of the event-related potential waveform, indicating that their processing was being actively suppressed. Subsequent affective evaluations revealed that memory-matching distractors also received more negative ratings than non-matching distractors or previously-unseen shapes. Moreover, Pd magnitude was greater on trials in which the memory-matching distractors were later rated negatively than on trials preceding positive ratings. These results support the devaluation-by-inhibition hypothesis and strongly suggest that fluctuations in stimulus inhibition are closely associated with subsequent affective evaluations. In contrast, none of the evaluative-coding based predictions were confirmed. •Test competing hypotheses about how visual distractors become affectively devalued.•Recorded event-related potentials to distractors during visual-memory maintenance.•ERP index of distractor suppression (Pd component) linked to later stimulus ratings.•Results confirm predictions from devaluation-by-inhibition hypothesis.•Findings fail to confirm predictions from evaluative-coding hypothesis.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><pmid>28341131</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2017.03.022</doi><tpages>11</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0028-3932
ispartof Neuropsychologia, 2017-05, Vol.99, p.259-269
issn 0028-3932
1873-3514
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1881269035
source MEDLINE; ScienceDirect Journals (5 years ago - present)
subjects Adolescent
Affect - physiology
Affective evaluation
Attentional inhibition
Brain - physiology
Devaluation-by-inhibition
Distractor devaluation
EEG/ERP
Electroencephalography
Evaluative codes
Evoked Potentials
Female
Humans
Inhibition (Psychology)
Male
Memory, Short-Term - physiology
Models, Psychological
Neuropsychological Tests
Pd component
Visual Perception - physiology
Working memory
Young Adult
title Neural evidence that inhibition is linked to the affective devaluation of distractors that match the contents of working memory
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-05T21%3A01%3A50IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Neural%20evidence%20that%20inhibition%20is%20linked%20to%20the%20affective%20devaluation%20of%20distractors%20that%20match%20the%20contents%20of%20working%20memory&rft.jtitle=Neuropsychologia&rft.au=De%20Vito,%20David&rft.date=2017-05&rft.volume=99&rft.spage=259&rft.epage=269&rft.pages=259-269&rft.issn=0028-3932&rft.eissn=1873-3514&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2017.03.022&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1881269035%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1881269035&rft_id=info:pmid/28341131&rft_els_id=S0028393217301021&rfr_iscdi=true