A Framework to Guide the Assessment of Human–Machine Systems

Objective: We have developed a framework for guiding measurement in human–machine systems. Background: The assessment of safety and performance in human–machine systems often relies on direct measurement, such as tracking reaction time and accidents. However, safety and performance emerge from the c...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Human factors 2017-03, Vol.59 (2), p.172-188
Hauptverfasser: Stowers, Kimberly, Oglesby, James, Sonesh, Shirley, Leyva, Kevin, Iwig, Chelsea, Salas, Eduardo
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 188
container_issue 2
container_start_page 172
container_title Human factors
container_volume 59
creator Stowers, Kimberly
Oglesby, James
Sonesh, Shirley
Leyva, Kevin
Iwig, Chelsea
Salas, Eduardo
description Objective: We have developed a framework for guiding measurement in human–machine systems. Background: The assessment of safety and performance in human–machine systems often relies on direct measurement, such as tracking reaction time and accidents. However, safety and performance emerge from the combination of several variables. The assessment of precursors to safety and performance are thus an important part of predicting and improving outcomes in human–machine systems. Method: As part of an in-depth literature analysis involving peer-reviewed, empirical articles, we located and classified variables important to human–machine systems, giving a snapshot of the state of science on human–machine system safety and performance. Using this information, we created a framework of safety and performance in human–machine systems. Results: This framework details several inputs and processes that collectively influence safety and performance. Inputs are divided according to human, machine, and environmental inputs. Processes are divided into attitudes, behaviors, and cognitive variables. Each class of inputs influences the processes and, subsequently, outcomes that emerge in human–machine systems. Conclusion: This framework offers a useful starting point for understanding the current state of the science and measuring many of the complex variables relating to safety and performance in human-machine systems. Application: This framework can be applied to the design, development, and implementation of automated machines in spaceflight, military, and health care settings. We present a hypothetical example in our write-up of how it can be used to aid in project success.
doi_str_mv 10.1177/0018720817695077
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1880086649</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sage_id>10.1177_0018720817695077</sage_id><sourcerecordid>1923712513</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c418t-48fe91710bf8f59fffdbc09b5fea3a0bb0ea5bedbb508d56210c1783641e4b733</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kMFKw0AQhhdRbK3ePcmCFy_RmSSb3VyEUmwrVDyo57CbzNrWJqnZBOnNd_ANfRITWkUET3OY7_9m-Bk7RbhElPIKAJX0QaGMYgFS7rE-ilB6ChXus3639rp9jx05twSAKA7EIev5KvDDSAZ9dj3k40rn9FZWL7wu-aRZZMTrOfGhc-RcTkXNS8unTa6Lz_ePO53OFwXxh42rKXfH7MDqlaOT3Rywp_HN42jqze4nt6PhzEtDVLUXKksxSgRjlRWxtTYzKcRGWNKBBmOAtDCUGSNAZSLyEVKUKohCpNDIIBiwi613XZWvDbk6yRcupdVKF1Q2LkGlAFQUhXGLnv9Bl2VTFe13CcZ-INEX2AlhS6VV6VxFNllXi1xXmwQh6bpN_nbbRs524sbklP0EvstsAW8LOP1Mv67-J_wCkp-ALg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1923712513</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>A Framework to Guide the Assessment of Human–Machine Systems</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>SAGE Complete A-Z List</source><creator>Stowers, Kimberly ; Oglesby, James ; Sonesh, Shirley ; Leyva, Kevin ; Iwig, Chelsea ; Salas, Eduardo</creator><creatorcontrib>Stowers, Kimberly ; Oglesby, James ; Sonesh, Shirley ; Leyva, Kevin ; Iwig, Chelsea ; Salas, Eduardo</creatorcontrib><description>Objective: We have developed a framework for guiding measurement in human–machine systems. Background: The assessment of safety and performance in human–machine systems often relies on direct measurement, such as tracking reaction time and accidents. However, safety and performance emerge from the combination of several variables. The assessment of precursors to safety and performance are thus an important part of predicting and improving outcomes in human–machine systems. Method: As part of an in-depth literature analysis involving peer-reviewed, empirical articles, we located and classified variables important to human–machine systems, giving a snapshot of the state of science on human–machine system safety and performance. Using this information, we created a framework of safety and performance in human–machine systems. Results: This framework details several inputs and processes that collectively influence safety and performance. Inputs are divided according to human, machine, and environmental inputs. Processes are divided into attitudes, behaviors, and cognitive variables. Each class of inputs influences the processes and, subsequently, outcomes that emerge in human–machine systems. Conclusion: This framework offers a useful starting point for understanding the current state of the science and measuring many of the complex variables relating to safety and performance in human-machine systems. Application: This framework can be applied to the design, development, and implementation of automated machines in spaceflight, military, and health care settings. We present a hypothetical example in our write-up of how it can be used to aid in project success.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0018-7208</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1547-8181</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1177/0018720817695077</identifier><identifier>PMID: 28324673</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Los Angeles, CA: SAGE Publications</publisher><subject>Cognitive ability ; Complex variables ; Empirical analysis ; Human behavior ; Human performance ; Humans ; Man machine systems ; Reaction time ; Reviews ; Safety ; Space flight ; Space life sciences ; Studies</subject><ispartof>Human factors, 2017-03, Vol.59 (2), p.172-188</ispartof><rights>2017, Human Factors and Ergonomics Society</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c418t-48fe91710bf8f59fffdbc09b5fea3a0bb0ea5bedbb508d56210c1783641e4b733</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c418t-48fe91710bf8f59fffdbc09b5fea3a0bb0ea5bedbb508d56210c1783641e4b733</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/pdf/10.1177/0018720817695077$$EPDF$$P50$$Gsage$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0018720817695077$$EHTML$$P50$$Gsage$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,21818,27923,27924,43620,43621</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28324673$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Stowers, Kimberly</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Oglesby, James</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sonesh, Shirley</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Leyva, Kevin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Iwig, Chelsea</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Salas, Eduardo</creatorcontrib><title>A Framework to Guide the Assessment of Human–Machine Systems</title><title>Human factors</title><addtitle>Hum Factors</addtitle><description>Objective: We have developed a framework for guiding measurement in human–machine systems. Background: The assessment of safety and performance in human–machine systems often relies on direct measurement, such as tracking reaction time and accidents. However, safety and performance emerge from the combination of several variables. The assessment of precursors to safety and performance are thus an important part of predicting and improving outcomes in human–machine systems. Method: As part of an in-depth literature analysis involving peer-reviewed, empirical articles, we located and classified variables important to human–machine systems, giving a snapshot of the state of science on human–machine system safety and performance. Using this information, we created a framework of safety and performance in human–machine systems. Results: This framework details several inputs and processes that collectively influence safety and performance. Inputs are divided according to human, machine, and environmental inputs. Processes are divided into attitudes, behaviors, and cognitive variables. Each class of inputs influences the processes and, subsequently, outcomes that emerge in human–machine systems. Conclusion: This framework offers a useful starting point for understanding the current state of the science and measuring many of the complex variables relating to safety and performance in human-machine systems. Application: This framework can be applied to the design, development, and implementation of automated machines in spaceflight, military, and health care settings. We present a hypothetical example in our write-up of how it can be used to aid in project success.</description><subject>Cognitive ability</subject><subject>Complex variables</subject><subject>Empirical analysis</subject><subject>Human behavior</subject><subject>Human performance</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Man machine systems</subject><subject>Reaction time</subject><subject>Reviews</subject><subject>Safety</subject><subject>Space flight</subject><subject>Space life sciences</subject><subject>Studies</subject><issn>0018-7208</issn><issn>1547-8181</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2017</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kMFKw0AQhhdRbK3ePcmCFy_RmSSb3VyEUmwrVDyo57CbzNrWJqnZBOnNd_ANfRITWkUET3OY7_9m-Bk7RbhElPIKAJX0QaGMYgFS7rE-ilB6ChXus3639rp9jx05twSAKA7EIev5KvDDSAZ9dj3k40rn9FZWL7wu-aRZZMTrOfGhc-RcTkXNS8unTa6Lz_ePO53OFwXxh42rKXfH7MDqlaOT3Rywp_HN42jqze4nt6PhzEtDVLUXKksxSgRjlRWxtTYzKcRGWNKBBmOAtDCUGSNAZSLyEVKUKohCpNDIIBiwi613XZWvDbk6yRcupdVKF1Q2LkGlAFQUhXGLnv9Bl2VTFe13CcZ-INEX2AlhS6VV6VxFNllXi1xXmwQh6bpN_nbbRs524sbklP0EvstsAW8LOP1Mv67-J_wCkp-ALg</recordid><startdate>20170301</startdate><enddate>20170301</enddate><creator>Stowers, Kimberly</creator><creator>Oglesby, James</creator><creator>Sonesh, Shirley</creator><creator>Leyva, Kevin</creator><creator>Iwig, Chelsea</creator><creator>Salas, Eduardo</creator><general>SAGE Publications</general><general>Human Factors and Ergonomics Society</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QF</scope><scope>7QQ</scope><scope>7SC</scope><scope>7SE</scope><scope>7SP</scope><scope>7SR</scope><scope>7T2</scope><scope>7TA</scope><scope>7TB</scope><scope>7TK</scope><scope>7U5</scope><scope>8BQ</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>F28</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>H8D</scope><scope>H8G</scope><scope>JG9</scope><scope>JQ2</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KR7</scope><scope>L7M</scope><scope>L~C</scope><scope>L~D</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20170301</creationdate><title>A Framework to Guide the Assessment of Human–Machine Systems</title><author>Stowers, Kimberly ; Oglesby, James ; Sonesh, Shirley ; Leyva, Kevin ; Iwig, Chelsea ; Salas, Eduardo</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c418t-48fe91710bf8f59fffdbc09b5fea3a0bb0ea5bedbb508d56210c1783641e4b733</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2017</creationdate><topic>Cognitive ability</topic><topic>Complex variables</topic><topic>Empirical analysis</topic><topic>Human behavior</topic><topic>Human performance</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Man machine systems</topic><topic>Reaction time</topic><topic>Reviews</topic><topic>Safety</topic><topic>Space flight</topic><topic>Space life sciences</topic><topic>Studies</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Stowers, Kimberly</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Oglesby, James</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sonesh, Shirley</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Leyva, Kevin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Iwig, Chelsea</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Salas, Eduardo</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Aluminium Industry Abstracts</collection><collection>Ceramic Abstracts</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts</collection><collection>Corrosion Abstracts</collection><collection>Electronics &amp; Communications Abstracts</collection><collection>Engineered Materials Abstracts</collection><collection>Health and Safety Science Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Materials Business File</collection><collection>Mechanical &amp; Transportation Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Neurosciences Abstracts</collection><collection>Solid State and Superconductivity Abstracts</collection><collection>METADEX</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ANTE: Abstracts in New Technology &amp; Engineering</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Aerospace Database</collection><collection>Copper Technical Reference Library</collection><collection>Materials Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Computer Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Civil Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts – Academic</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts Professional</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Human factors</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Stowers, Kimberly</au><au>Oglesby, James</au><au>Sonesh, Shirley</au><au>Leyva, Kevin</au><au>Iwig, Chelsea</au><au>Salas, Eduardo</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>A Framework to Guide the Assessment of Human–Machine Systems</atitle><jtitle>Human factors</jtitle><addtitle>Hum Factors</addtitle><date>2017-03-01</date><risdate>2017</risdate><volume>59</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>172</spage><epage>188</epage><pages>172-188</pages><issn>0018-7208</issn><eissn>1547-8181</eissn><abstract>Objective: We have developed a framework for guiding measurement in human–machine systems. Background: The assessment of safety and performance in human–machine systems often relies on direct measurement, such as tracking reaction time and accidents. However, safety and performance emerge from the combination of several variables. The assessment of precursors to safety and performance are thus an important part of predicting and improving outcomes in human–machine systems. Method: As part of an in-depth literature analysis involving peer-reviewed, empirical articles, we located and classified variables important to human–machine systems, giving a snapshot of the state of science on human–machine system safety and performance. Using this information, we created a framework of safety and performance in human–machine systems. Results: This framework details several inputs and processes that collectively influence safety and performance. Inputs are divided according to human, machine, and environmental inputs. Processes are divided into attitudes, behaviors, and cognitive variables. Each class of inputs influences the processes and, subsequently, outcomes that emerge in human–machine systems. Conclusion: This framework offers a useful starting point for understanding the current state of the science and measuring many of the complex variables relating to safety and performance in human-machine systems. Application: This framework can be applied to the design, development, and implementation of automated machines in spaceflight, military, and health care settings. We present a hypothetical example in our write-up of how it can be used to aid in project success.</abstract><cop>Los Angeles, CA</cop><pub>SAGE Publications</pub><pmid>28324673</pmid><doi>10.1177/0018720817695077</doi><tpages>17</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0018-7208
ispartof Human factors, 2017-03, Vol.59 (2), p.172-188
issn 0018-7208
1547-8181
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1880086649
source MEDLINE; SAGE Complete A-Z List
subjects Cognitive ability
Complex variables
Empirical analysis
Human behavior
Human performance
Humans
Man machine systems
Reaction time
Reviews
Safety
Space flight
Space life sciences
Studies
title A Framework to Guide the Assessment of Human–Machine Systems
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-08T21%3A44%3A40IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=A%20Framework%20to%20Guide%20the%20Assessment%20of%20Human%E2%80%93Machine%20Systems&rft.jtitle=Human%20factors&rft.au=Stowers,%20Kimberly&rft.date=2017-03-01&rft.volume=59&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=172&rft.epage=188&rft.pages=172-188&rft.issn=0018-7208&rft.eissn=1547-8181&rft_id=info:doi/10.1177/0018720817695077&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1923712513%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1923712513&rft_id=info:pmid/28324673&rft_sage_id=10.1177_0018720817695077&rfr_iscdi=true