A Framework to Guide the Assessment of Human–Machine Systems
Objective: We have developed a framework for guiding measurement in human–machine systems. Background: The assessment of safety and performance in human–machine systems often relies on direct measurement, such as tracking reaction time and accidents. However, safety and performance emerge from the c...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Human factors 2017-03, Vol.59 (2), p.172-188 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 188 |
---|---|
container_issue | 2 |
container_start_page | 172 |
container_title | Human factors |
container_volume | 59 |
creator | Stowers, Kimberly Oglesby, James Sonesh, Shirley Leyva, Kevin Iwig, Chelsea Salas, Eduardo |
description | Objective:
We have developed a framework for guiding measurement in human–machine systems.
Background:
The assessment of safety and performance in human–machine systems often relies on direct measurement, such as tracking reaction time and accidents. However, safety and performance emerge from the combination of several variables. The assessment of precursors to safety and performance are thus an important part of predicting and improving outcomes in human–machine systems.
Method:
As part of an in-depth literature analysis involving peer-reviewed, empirical articles, we located and classified variables important to human–machine systems, giving a snapshot of the state of science on human–machine system safety and performance. Using this information, we created a framework of safety and performance in human–machine systems.
Results:
This framework details several inputs and processes that collectively influence safety and performance. Inputs are divided according to human, machine, and environmental inputs. Processes are divided into attitudes, behaviors, and cognitive variables. Each class of inputs influences the processes and, subsequently, outcomes that emerge in human–machine systems.
Conclusion:
This framework offers a useful starting point for understanding the current state of the science and measuring many of the complex variables relating to safety and performance in human-machine systems.
Application:
This framework can be applied to the design, development, and implementation of automated machines in spaceflight, military, and health care settings. We present a hypothetical example in our write-up of how it can be used to aid in project success. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1177/0018720817695077 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1880086649</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sage_id>10.1177_0018720817695077</sage_id><sourcerecordid>1923712513</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c418t-48fe91710bf8f59fffdbc09b5fea3a0bb0ea5bedbb508d56210c1783641e4b733</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kMFKw0AQhhdRbK3ePcmCFy_RmSSb3VyEUmwrVDyo57CbzNrWJqnZBOnNd_ANfRITWkUET3OY7_9m-Bk7RbhElPIKAJX0QaGMYgFS7rE-ilB6ChXus3639rp9jx05twSAKA7EIev5KvDDSAZ9dj3k40rn9FZWL7wu-aRZZMTrOfGhc-RcTkXNS8unTa6Lz_ePO53OFwXxh42rKXfH7MDqlaOT3Rywp_HN42jqze4nt6PhzEtDVLUXKksxSgRjlRWxtTYzKcRGWNKBBmOAtDCUGSNAZSLyEVKUKohCpNDIIBiwi613XZWvDbk6yRcupdVKF1Q2LkGlAFQUhXGLnv9Bl2VTFe13CcZ-INEX2AlhS6VV6VxFNllXi1xXmwQh6bpN_nbbRs524sbklP0EvstsAW8LOP1Mv67-J_wCkp-ALg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1923712513</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>A Framework to Guide the Assessment of Human–Machine Systems</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>SAGE Complete A-Z List</source><creator>Stowers, Kimberly ; Oglesby, James ; Sonesh, Shirley ; Leyva, Kevin ; Iwig, Chelsea ; Salas, Eduardo</creator><creatorcontrib>Stowers, Kimberly ; Oglesby, James ; Sonesh, Shirley ; Leyva, Kevin ; Iwig, Chelsea ; Salas, Eduardo</creatorcontrib><description>Objective:
We have developed a framework for guiding measurement in human–machine systems.
Background:
The assessment of safety and performance in human–machine systems often relies on direct measurement, such as tracking reaction time and accidents. However, safety and performance emerge from the combination of several variables. The assessment of precursors to safety and performance are thus an important part of predicting and improving outcomes in human–machine systems.
Method:
As part of an in-depth literature analysis involving peer-reviewed, empirical articles, we located and classified variables important to human–machine systems, giving a snapshot of the state of science on human–machine system safety and performance. Using this information, we created a framework of safety and performance in human–machine systems.
Results:
This framework details several inputs and processes that collectively influence safety and performance. Inputs are divided according to human, machine, and environmental inputs. Processes are divided into attitudes, behaviors, and cognitive variables. Each class of inputs influences the processes and, subsequently, outcomes that emerge in human–machine systems.
Conclusion:
This framework offers a useful starting point for understanding the current state of the science and measuring many of the complex variables relating to safety and performance in human-machine systems.
Application:
This framework can be applied to the design, development, and implementation of automated machines in spaceflight, military, and health care settings. We present a hypothetical example in our write-up of how it can be used to aid in project success.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0018-7208</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1547-8181</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1177/0018720817695077</identifier><identifier>PMID: 28324673</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Los Angeles, CA: SAGE Publications</publisher><subject>Cognitive ability ; Complex variables ; Empirical analysis ; Human behavior ; Human performance ; Humans ; Man machine systems ; Reaction time ; Reviews ; Safety ; Space flight ; Space life sciences ; Studies</subject><ispartof>Human factors, 2017-03, Vol.59 (2), p.172-188</ispartof><rights>2017, Human Factors and Ergonomics Society</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c418t-48fe91710bf8f59fffdbc09b5fea3a0bb0ea5bedbb508d56210c1783641e4b733</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c418t-48fe91710bf8f59fffdbc09b5fea3a0bb0ea5bedbb508d56210c1783641e4b733</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/pdf/10.1177/0018720817695077$$EPDF$$P50$$Gsage$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0018720817695077$$EHTML$$P50$$Gsage$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,21818,27923,27924,43620,43621</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28324673$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Stowers, Kimberly</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Oglesby, James</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sonesh, Shirley</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Leyva, Kevin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Iwig, Chelsea</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Salas, Eduardo</creatorcontrib><title>A Framework to Guide the Assessment of Human–Machine Systems</title><title>Human factors</title><addtitle>Hum Factors</addtitle><description>Objective:
We have developed a framework for guiding measurement in human–machine systems.
Background:
The assessment of safety and performance in human–machine systems often relies on direct measurement, such as tracking reaction time and accidents. However, safety and performance emerge from the combination of several variables. The assessment of precursors to safety and performance are thus an important part of predicting and improving outcomes in human–machine systems.
Method:
As part of an in-depth literature analysis involving peer-reviewed, empirical articles, we located and classified variables important to human–machine systems, giving a snapshot of the state of science on human–machine system safety and performance. Using this information, we created a framework of safety and performance in human–machine systems.
Results:
This framework details several inputs and processes that collectively influence safety and performance. Inputs are divided according to human, machine, and environmental inputs. Processes are divided into attitudes, behaviors, and cognitive variables. Each class of inputs influences the processes and, subsequently, outcomes that emerge in human–machine systems.
Conclusion:
This framework offers a useful starting point for understanding the current state of the science and measuring many of the complex variables relating to safety and performance in human-machine systems.
Application:
This framework can be applied to the design, development, and implementation of automated machines in spaceflight, military, and health care settings. We present a hypothetical example in our write-up of how it can be used to aid in project success.</description><subject>Cognitive ability</subject><subject>Complex variables</subject><subject>Empirical analysis</subject><subject>Human behavior</subject><subject>Human performance</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Man machine systems</subject><subject>Reaction time</subject><subject>Reviews</subject><subject>Safety</subject><subject>Space flight</subject><subject>Space life sciences</subject><subject>Studies</subject><issn>0018-7208</issn><issn>1547-8181</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2017</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kMFKw0AQhhdRbK3ePcmCFy_RmSSb3VyEUmwrVDyo57CbzNrWJqnZBOnNd_ANfRITWkUET3OY7_9m-Bk7RbhElPIKAJX0QaGMYgFS7rE-ilB6ChXus3639rp9jx05twSAKA7EIev5KvDDSAZ9dj3k40rn9FZWL7wu-aRZZMTrOfGhc-RcTkXNS8unTa6Lz_ePO53OFwXxh42rKXfH7MDqlaOT3Rywp_HN42jqze4nt6PhzEtDVLUXKksxSgRjlRWxtTYzKcRGWNKBBmOAtDCUGSNAZSLyEVKUKohCpNDIIBiwi613XZWvDbk6yRcupdVKF1Q2LkGlAFQUhXGLnv9Bl2VTFe13CcZ-INEX2AlhS6VV6VxFNllXi1xXmwQh6bpN_nbbRs524sbklP0EvstsAW8LOP1Mv67-J_wCkp-ALg</recordid><startdate>20170301</startdate><enddate>20170301</enddate><creator>Stowers, Kimberly</creator><creator>Oglesby, James</creator><creator>Sonesh, Shirley</creator><creator>Leyva, Kevin</creator><creator>Iwig, Chelsea</creator><creator>Salas, Eduardo</creator><general>SAGE Publications</general><general>Human Factors and Ergonomics Society</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QF</scope><scope>7QQ</scope><scope>7SC</scope><scope>7SE</scope><scope>7SP</scope><scope>7SR</scope><scope>7T2</scope><scope>7TA</scope><scope>7TB</scope><scope>7TK</scope><scope>7U5</scope><scope>8BQ</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>F28</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>H8D</scope><scope>H8G</scope><scope>JG9</scope><scope>JQ2</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KR7</scope><scope>L7M</scope><scope>L~C</scope><scope>L~D</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20170301</creationdate><title>A Framework to Guide the Assessment of Human–Machine Systems</title><author>Stowers, Kimberly ; Oglesby, James ; Sonesh, Shirley ; Leyva, Kevin ; Iwig, Chelsea ; Salas, Eduardo</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c418t-48fe91710bf8f59fffdbc09b5fea3a0bb0ea5bedbb508d56210c1783641e4b733</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2017</creationdate><topic>Cognitive ability</topic><topic>Complex variables</topic><topic>Empirical analysis</topic><topic>Human behavior</topic><topic>Human performance</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Man machine systems</topic><topic>Reaction time</topic><topic>Reviews</topic><topic>Safety</topic><topic>Space flight</topic><topic>Space life sciences</topic><topic>Studies</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Stowers, Kimberly</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Oglesby, James</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sonesh, Shirley</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Leyva, Kevin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Iwig, Chelsea</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Salas, Eduardo</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Aluminium Industry Abstracts</collection><collection>Ceramic Abstracts</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts</collection><collection>Corrosion Abstracts</collection><collection>Electronics & Communications Abstracts</collection><collection>Engineered Materials Abstracts</collection><collection>Health and Safety Science Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Materials Business File</collection><collection>Mechanical & Transportation Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Neurosciences Abstracts</collection><collection>Solid State and Superconductivity Abstracts</collection><collection>METADEX</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ANTE: Abstracts in New Technology & Engineering</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Aerospace Database</collection><collection>Copper Technical Reference Library</collection><collection>Materials Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Computer Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Civil Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts Academic</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts Professional</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Human factors</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Stowers, Kimberly</au><au>Oglesby, James</au><au>Sonesh, Shirley</au><au>Leyva, Kevin</au><au>Iwig, Chelsea</au><au>Salas, Eduardo</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>A Framework to Guide the Assessment of Human–Machine Systems</atitle><jtitle>Human factors</jtitle><addtitle>Hum Factors</addtitle><date>2017-03-01</date><risdate>2017</risdate><volume>59</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>172</spage><epage>188</epage><pages>172-188</pages><issn>0018-7208</issn><eissn>1547-8181</eissn><abstract>Objective:
We have developed a framework for guiding measurement in human–machine systems.
Background:
The assessment of safety and performance in human–machine systems often relies on direct measurement, such as tracking reaction time and accidents. However, safety and performance emerge from the combination of several variables. The assessment of precursors to safety and performance are thus an important part of predicting and improving outcomes in human–machine systems.
Method:
As part of an in-depth literature analysis involving peer-reviewed, empirical articles, we located and classified variables important to human–machine systems, giving a snapshot of the state of science on human–machine system safety and performance. Using this information, we created a framework of safety and performance in human–machine systems.
Results:
This framework details several inputs and processes that collectively influence safety and performance. Inputs are divided according to human, machine, and environmental inputs. Processes are divided into attitudes, behaviors, and cognitive variables. Each class of inputs influences the processes and, subsequently, outcomes that emerge in human–machine systems.
Conclusion:
This framework offers a useful starting point for understanding the current state of the science and measuring many of the complex variables relating to safety and performance in human-machine systems.
Application:
This framework can be applied to the design, development, and implementation of automated machines in spaceflight, military, and health care settings. We present a hypothetical example in our write-up of how it can be used to aid in project success.</abstract><cop>Los Angeles, CA</cop><pub>SAGE Publications</pub><pmid>28324673</pmid><doi>10.1177/0018720817695077</doi><tpages>17</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0018-7208 |
ispartof | Human factors, 2017-03, Vol.59 (2), p.172-188 |
issn | 0018-7208 1547-8181 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1880086649 |
source | MEDLINE; SAGE Complete A-Z List |
subjects | Cognitive ability Complex variables Empirical analysis Human behavior Human performance Humans Man machine systems Reaction time Reviews Safety Space flight Space life sciences Studies |
title | A Framework to Guide the Assessment of Human–Machine Systems |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-08T21%3A44%3A40IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=A%20Framework%20to%20Guide%20the%20Assessment%20of%20Human%E2%80%93Machine%20Systems&rft.jtitle=Human%20factors&rft.au=Stowers,%20Kimberly&rft.date=2017-03-01&rft.volume=59&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=172&rft.epage=188&rft.pages=172-188&rft.issn=0018-7208&rft.eissn=1547-8181&rft_id=info:doi/10.1177/0018720817695077&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1923712513%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1923712513&rft_id=info:pmid/28324673&rft_sage_id=10.1177_0018720817695077&rfr_iscdi=true |