The Role of Predictability in Intonational Variability

Predictability is known to affect many properties of speech production. In particular, it has been observed that highly predictable elements (words, syllables) are produced with less phonetic prominence (shorter duration, less peripheral vowels) than less predictable elements. This tendency has been...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Language and speech 2017-03, Vol.60 (1), p.123-153
1. Verfasser: Turnbull, Rory
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 153
container_issue 1
container_start_page 123
container_title Language and speech
container_volume 60
creator Turnbull, Rory
description Predictability is known to affect many properties of speech production. In particular, it has been observed that highly predictable elements (words, syllables) are produced with less phonetic prominence (shorter duration, less peripheral vowels) than less predictable elements. This tendency has been proposed to be a general property of language. This paper examines whether predictability is correlated with fundamental frequency (F0) production, through analysis of experimental corpora of American English. Predictability was variously defined as discourse mention, utterance probability, and semantic focus. The results revealed consistent effects of utterance probability and semantic focus on F0, in the expected direction: less predictable words were produced with a higher F0 than more predictable words. However, no effect of discourse mention was observed. These results provide further empirical support for the generalization that phonetic prominence is inversely related to linguistic predictability. In addition, the divergent results for different predictability measures suggests that the parameterization of predictability within a particular experimental design can have significant impact on the interpretation of results, and that it cannot be assumed that two measures necessarily reflect the same cognitive reality.
doi_str_mv 10.1177/0023830916647079
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1880084199</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sage_id>10.1177_0023830916647079</sage_id><sourcerecordid>1880084199</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c365t-23aa8bcfcb1077577dd112cefd6c28742c6da57c786a239ccd276da1c2fffd093</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kEtLAzEUhYMotlb3rmTAjZvRPGbyWEqpWigoUt0OmTw0ZTqpycyi_94MrSIFNwm55zvnhgPAJYK3CDF2ByEmnECBKC0YZOIIjBEraU5hSY7BeJDzQR-BsxhXML0p5qdghDnBVHA6BnT5abJX35jM2-wlGO1UJ2vXuG6buTabt51vZefS0WTvMri9dg5OrGyiudjfE_D2MFtOn_LF8-N8er_IFaFll2MiJa-VVTWCjJWMaY0QVsZqqjBnBVZUy5IpxqnERCilMUsTpLC1VkNBJuBml7sJ_qs3savWLirTNLI1vo8V4hxCXiAxoNcH6Mr3If17oARitMSkSBTcUSr4GIOx1Sa4tQzbCsFq6LQ67DRZrvbBfb02-tfwU2IC8h0Q5Yf5s_W_wG9HCnzr</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1891765234</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>The Role of Predictability in Intonational Variability</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>SAGE Complete</source><creator>Turnbull, Rory</creator><creatorcontrib>Turnbull, Rory</creatorcontrib><description>Predictability is known to affect many properties of speech production. In particular, it has been observed that highly predictable elements (words, syllables) are produced with less phonetic prominence (shorter duration, less peripheral vowels) than less predictable elements. This tendency has been proposed to be a general property of language. This paper examines whether predictability is correlated with fundamental frequency (F0) production, through analysis of experimental corpora of American English. Predictability was variously defined as discourse mention, utterance probability, and semantic focus. The results revealed consistent effects of utterance probability and semantic focus on F0, in the expected direction: less predictable words were produced with a higher F0 than more predictable words. However, no effect of discourse mention was observed. These results provide further empirical support for the generalization that phonetic prominence is inversely related to linguistic predictability. In addition, the divergent results for different predictability measures suggests that the parameterization of predictability within a particular experimental design can have significant impact on the interpretation of results, and that it cannot be assumed that two measures necessarily reflect the same cognitive reality.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0023-8309</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1756-6053</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1177/0023830916647079</identifier><identifier>PMID: 28326986</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>London, England: SAGE Publications</publisher><subject>Acoustic Stimulation ; Cognition ; Cues ; English ; Fundamental frequency ; Humans ; Intonation ; North American English ; Phonetics ; Phonology ; Pitch Perception ; Research Design ; Semantics ; Semiotics ; Speech Acoustics ; Speech Intelligibility ; Speech Perception ; Speech production ; Speech Production Measurement ; Time Factors ; Voice Quality</subject><ispartof>Language and speech, 2017-03, Vol.60 (1), p.123-153</ispartof><rights>The Author(s) 2016</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c365t-23aa8bcfcb1077577dd112cefd6c28742c6da57c786a239ccd276da1c2fffd093</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c365t-23aa8bcfcb1077577dd112cefd6c28742c6da57c786a239ccd276da1c2fffd093</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/pdf/10.1177/0023830916647079$$EPDF$$P50$$Gsage$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0023830916647079$$EHTML$$P50$$Gsage$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,21798,27901,27902,43597,43598</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28326986$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Turnbull, Rory</creatorcontrib><title>The Role of Predictability in Intonational Variability</title><title>Language and speech</title><addtitle>Lang Speech</addtitle><description>Predictability is known to affect many properties of speech production. In particular, it has been observed that highly predictable elements (words, syllables) are produced with less phonetic prominence (shorter duration, less peripheral vowels) than less predictable elements. This tendency has been proposed to be a general property of language. This paper examines whether predictability is correlated with fundamental frequency (F0) production, through analysis of experimental corpora of American English. Predictability was variously defined as discourse mention, utterance probability, and semantic focus. The results revealed consistent effects of utterance probability and semantic focus on F0, in the expected direction: less predictable words were produced with a higher F0 than more predictable words. However, no effect of discourse mention was observed. These results provide further empirical support for the generalization that phonetic prominence is inversely related to linguistic predictability. In addition, the divergent results for different predictability measures suggests that the parameterization of predictability within a particular experimental design can have significant impact on the interpretation of results, and that it cannot be assumed that two measures necessarily reflect the same cognitive reality.</description><subject>Acoustic Stimulation</subject><subject>Cognition</subject><subject>Cues</subject><subject>English</subject><subject>Fundamental frequency</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Intonation</subject><subject>North American English</subject><subject>Phonetics</subject><subject>Phonology</subject><subject>Pitch Perception</subject><subject>Research Design</subject><subject>Semantics</subject><subject>Semiotics</subject><subject>Speech Acoustics</subject><subject>Speech Intelligibility</subject><subject>Speech Perception</subject><subject>Speech production</subject><subject>Speech Production Measurement</subject><subject>Time Factors</subject><subject>Voice Quality</subject><issn>0023-8309</issn><issn>1756-6053</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2017</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kEtLAzEUhYMotlb3rmTAjZvRPGbyWEqpWigoUt0OmTw0ZTqpycyi_94MrSIFNwm55zvnhgPAJYK3CDF2ByEmnECBKC0YZOIIjBEraU5hSY7BeJDzQR-BsxhXML0p5qdghDnBVHA6BnT5abJX35jM2-wlGO1UJ2vXuG6buTabt51vZefS0WTvMri9dg5OrGyiudjfE_D2MFtOn_LF8-N8er_IFaFll2MiJa-VVTWCjJWMaY0QVsZqqjBnBVZUy5IpxqnERCilMUsTpLC1VkNBJuBml7sJ_qs3savWLirTNLI1vo8V4hxCXiAxoNcH6Mr3If17oARitMSkSBTcUSr4GIOx1Sa4tQzbCsFq6LQ67DRZrvbBfb02-tfwU2IC8h0Q5Yf5s_W_wG9HCnzr</recordid><startdate>201703</startdate><enddate>201703</enddate><creator>Turnbull, Rory</creator><general>SAGE Publications</general><general>Sage Publications Ltd</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7T9</scope><scope>8BM</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201703</creationdate><title>The Role of Predictability in Intonational Variability</title><author>Turnbull, Rory</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c365t-23aa8bcfcb1077577dd112cefd6c28742c6da57c786a239ccd276da1c2fffd093</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2017</creationdate><topic>Acoustic Stimulation</topic><topic>Cognition</topic><topic>Cues</topic><topic>English</topic><topic>Fundamental frequency</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Intonation</topic><topic>North American English</topic><topic>Phonetics</topic><topic>Phonology</topic><topic>Pitch Perception</topic><topic>Research Design</topic><topic>Semantics</topic><topic>Semiotics</topic><topic>Speech Acoustics</topic><topic>Speech Intelligibility</topic><topic>Speech Perception</topic><topic>Speech production</topic><topic>Speech Production Measurement</topic><topic>Time Factors</topic><topic>Voice Quality</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Turnbull, Rory</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Linguistics and Language Behavior Abstracts (LLBA)</collection><collection>ComDisDome</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Language and speech</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Turnbull, Rory</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>The Role of Predictability in Intonational Variability</atitle><jtitle>Language and speech</jtitle><addtitle>Lang Speech</addtitle><date>2017-03</date><risdate>2017</risdate><volume>60</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>123</spage><epage>153</epage><pages>123-153</pages><issn>0023-8309</issn><eissn>1756-6053</eissn><abstract>Predictability is known to affect many properties of speech production. In particular, it has been observed that highly predictable elements (words, syllables) are produced with less phonetic prominence (shorter duration, less peripheral vowels) than less predictable elements. This tendency has been proposed to be a general property of language. This paper examines whether predictability is correlated with fundamental frequency (F0) production, through analysis of experimental corpora of American English. Predictability was variously defined as discourse mention, utterance probability, and semantic focus. The results revealed consistent effects of utterance probability and semantic focus on F0, in the expected direction: less predictable words were produced with a higher F0 than more predictable words. However, no effect of discourse mention was observed. These results provide further empirical support for the generalization that phonetic prominence is inversely related to linguistic predictability. In addition, the divergent results for different predictability measures suggests that the parameterization of predictability within a particular experimental design can have significant impact on the interpretation of results, and that it cannot be assumed that two measures necessarily reflect the same cognitive reality.</abstract><cop>London, England</cop><pub>SAGE Publications</pub><pmid>28326986</pmid><doi>10.1177/0023830916647079</doi><tpages>31</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0023-8309
ispartof Language and speech, 2017-03, Vol.60 (1), p.123-153
issn 0023-8309
1756-6053
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1880084199
source MEDLINE; SAGE Complete
subjects Acoustic Stimulation
Cognition
Cues
English
Fundamental frequency
Humans
Intonation
North American English
Phonetics
Phonology
Pitch Perception
Research Design
Semantics
Semiotics
Speech Acoustics
Speech Intelligibility
Speech Perception
Speech production
Speech Production Measurement
Time Factors
Voice Quality
title The Role of Predictability in Intonational Variability
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-10T23%3A26%3A26IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20Role%20of%20Predictability%20in%20Intonational%20Variability&rft.jtitle=Language%20and%20speech&rft.au=Turnbull,%20Rory&rft.date=2017-03&rft.volume=60&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=123&rft.epage=153&rft.pages=123-153&rft.issn=0023-8309&rft.eissn=1756-6053&rft_id=info:doi/10.1177/0023830916647079&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1880084199%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1891765234&rft_id=info:pmid/28326986&rft_sage_id=10.1177_0023830916647079&rfr_iscdi=true