The Role of Predictability in Intonational Variability
Predictability is known to affect many properties of speech production. In particular, it has been observed that highly predictable elements (words, syllables) are produced with less phonetic prominence (shorter duration, less peripheral vowels) than less predictable elements. This tendency has been...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Language and speech 2017-03, Vol.60 (1), p.123-153 |
---|---|
1. Verfasser: | |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 153 |
---|---|
container_issue | 1 |
container_start_page | 123 |
container_title | Language and speech |
container_volume | 60 |
creator | Turnbull, Rory |
description | Predictability is known to affect many properties of speech production. In particular, it has been observed that highly predictable elements (words, syllables) are produced with less phonetic prominence (shorter duration, less peripheral vowels) than less predictable elements. This tendency has been proposed to be a general property of language. This paper examines whether predictability is correlated with fundamental frequency (F0) production, through analysis of experimental corpora of American English. Predictability was variously defined as discourse mention, utterance probability, and semantic focus. The results revealed consistent effects of utterance probability and semantic focus on F0, in the expected direction: less predictable words were produced with a higher F0 than more predictable words. However, no effect of discourse mention was observed. These results provide further empirical support for the generalization that phonetic prominence is inversely related to linguistic predictability. In addition, the divergent results for different predictability measures suggests that the parameterization of predictability within a particular experimental design can have significant impact on the interpretation of results, and that it cannot be assumed that two measures necessarily reflect the same cognitive reality. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1177/0023830916647079 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1880084199</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sage_id>10.1177_0023830916647079</sage_id><sourcerecordid>1880084199</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c365t-23aa8bcfcb1077577dd112cefd6c28742c6da57c786a239ccd276da1c2fffd093</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kEtLAzEUhYMotlb3rmTAjZvRPGbyWEqpWigoUt0OmTw0ZTqpycyi_94MrSIFNwm55zvnhgPAJYK3CDF2ByEmnECBKC0YZOIIjBEraU5hSY7BeJDzQR-BsxhXML0p5qdghDnBVHA6BnT5abJX35jM2-wlGO1UJ2vXuG6buTabt51vZefS0WTvMri9dg5OrGyiudjfE_D2MFtOn_LF8-N8er_IFaFll2MiJa-VVTWCjJWMaY0QVsZqqjBnBVZUy5IpxqnERCilMUsTpLC1VkNBJuBml7sJ_qs3savWLirTNLI1vo8V4hxCXiAxoNcH6Mr3If17oARitMSkSBTcUSr4GIOx1Sa4tQzbCsFq6LQ67DRZrvbBfb02-tfwU2IC8h0Q5Yf5s_W_wG9HCnzr</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1891765234</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>The Role of Predictability in Intonational Variability</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>SAGE Complete</source><creator>Turnbull, Rory</creator><creatorcontrib>Turnbull, Rory</creatorcontrib><description>Predictability is known to affect many properties of speech production. In particular, it has been observed that highly predictable elements (words, syllables) are produced with less phonetic prominence (shorter duration, less peripheral vowels) than less predictable elements. This tendency has been proposed to be a general property of language. This paper examines whether predictability is correlated with fundamental frequency (F0) production, through analysis of experimental corpora of American English. Predictability was variously defined as discourse mention, utterance probability, and semantic focus. The results revealed consistent effects of utterance probability and semantic focus on F0, in the expected direction: less predictable words were produced with a higher F0 than more predictable words. However, no effect of discourse mention was observed. These results provide further empirical support for the generalization that phonetic prominence is inversely related to linguistic predictability. In addition, the divergent results for different predictability measures suggests that the parameterization of predictability within a particular experimental design can have significant impact on the interpretation of results, and that it cannot be assumed that two measures necessarily reflect the same cognitive reality.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0023-8309</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1756-6053</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1177/0023830916647079</identifier><identifier>PMID: 28326986</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>London, England: SAGE Publications</publisher><subject>Acoustic Stimulation ; Cognition ; Cues ; English ; Fundamental frequency ; Humans ; Intonation ; North American English ; Phonetics ; Phonology ; Pitch Perception ; Research Design ; Semantics ; Semiotics ; Speech Acoustics ; Speech Intelligibility ; Speech Perception ; Speech production ; Speech Production Measurement ; Time Factors ; Voice Quality</subject><ispartof>Language and speech, 2017-03, Vol.60 (1), p.123-153</ispartof><rights>The Author(s) 2016</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c365t-23aa8bcfcb1077577dd112cefd6c28742c6da57c786a239ccd276da1c2fffd093</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c365t-23aa8bcfcb1077577dd112cefd6c28742c6da57c786a239ccd276da1c2fffd093</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/pdf/10.1177/0023830916647079$$EPDF$$P50$$Gsage$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0023830916647079$$EHTML$$P50$$Gsage$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,21798,27901,27902,43597,43598</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28326986$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Turnbull, Rory</creatorcontrib><title>The Role of Predictability in Intonational Variability</title><title>Language and speech</title><addtitle>Lang Speech</addtitle><description>Predictability is known to affect many properties of speech production. In particular, it has been observed that highly predictable elements (words, syllables) are produced with less phonetic prominence (shorter duration, less peripheral vowels) than less predictable elements. This tendency has been proposed to be a general property of language. This paper examines whether predictability is correlated with fundamental frequency (F0) production, through analysis of experimental corpora of American English. Predictability was variously defined as discourse mention, utterance probability, and semantic focus. The results revealed consistent effects of utterance probability and semantic focus on F0, in the expected direction: less predictable words were produced with a higher F0 than more predictable words. However, no effect of discourse mention was observed. These results provide further empirical support for the generalization that phonetic prominence is inversely related to linguistic predictability. In addition, the divergent results for different predictability measures suggests that the parameterization of predictability within a particular experimental design can have significant impact on the interpretation of results, and that it cannot be assumed that two measures necessarily reflect the same cognitive reality.</description><subject>Acoustic Stimulation</subject><subject>Cognition</subject><subject>Cues</subject><subject>English</subject><subject>Fundamental frequency</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Intonation</subject><subject>North American English</subject><subject>Phonetics</subject><subject>Phonology</subject><subject>Pitch Perception</subject><subject>Research Design</subject><subject>Semantics</subject><subject>Semiotics</subject><subject>Speech Acoustics</subject><subject>Speech Intelligibility</subject><subject>Speech Perception</subject><subject>Speech production</subject><subject>Speech Production Measurement</subject><subject>Time Factors</subject><subject>Voice Quality</subject><issn>0023-8309</issn><issn>1756-6053</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2017</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kEtLAzEUhYMotlb3rmTAjZvRPGbyWEqpWigoUt0OmTw0ZTqpycyi_94MrSIFNwm55zvnhgPAJYK3CDF2ByEmnECBKC0YZOIIjBEraU5hSY7BeJDzQR-BsxhXML0p5qdghDnBVHA6BnT5abJX35jM2-wlGO1UJ2vXuG6buTabt51vZefS0WTvMri9dg5OrGyiudjfE_D2MFtOn_LF8-N8er_IFaFll2MiJa-VVTWCjJWMaY0QVsZqqjBnBVZUy5IpxqnERCilMUsTpLC1VkNBJuBml7sJ_qs3savWLirTNLI1vo8V4hxCXiAxoNcH6Mr3If17oARitMSkSBTcUSr4GIOx1Sa4tQzbCsFq6LQ67DRZrvbBfb02-tfwU2IC8h0Q5Yf5s_W_wG9HCnzr</recordid><startdate>201703</startdate><enddate>201703</enddate><creator>Turnbull, Rory</creator><general>SAGE Publications</general><general>Sage Publications Ltd</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7T9</scope><scope>8BM</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201703</creationdate><title>The Role of Predictability in Intonational Variability</title><author>Turnbull, Rory</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c365t-23aa8bcfcb1077577dd112cefd6c28742c6da57c786a239ccd276da1c2fffd093</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2017</creationdate><topic>Acoustic Stimulation</topic><topic>Cognition</topic><topic>Cues</topic><topic>English</topic><topic>Fundamental frequency</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Intonation</topic><topic>North American English</topic><topic>Phonetics</topic><topic>Phonology</topic><topic>Pitch Perception</topic><topic>Research Design</topic><topic>Semantics</topic><topic>Semiotics</topic><topic>Speech Acoustics</topic><topic>Speech Intelligibility</topic><topic>Speech Perception</topic><topic>Speech production</topic><topic>Speech Production Measurement</topic><topic>Time Factors</topic><topic>Voice Quality</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Turnbull, Rory</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Linguistics and Language Behavior Abstracts (LLBA)</collection><collection>ComDisDome</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Language and speech</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Turnbull, Rory</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>The Role of Predictability in Intonational Variability</atitle><jtitle>Language and speech</jtitle><addtitle>Lang Speech</addtitle><date>2017-03</date><risdate>2017</risdate><volume>60</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>123</spage><epage>153</epage><pages>123-153</pages><issn>0023-8309</issn><eissn>1756-6053</eissn><abstract>Predictability is known to affect many properties of speech production. In particular, it has been observed that highly predictable elements (words, syllables) are produced with less phonetic prominence (shorter duration, less peripheral vowels) than less predictable elements. This tendency has been proposed to be a general property of language. This paper examines whether predictability is correlated with fundamental frequency (F0) production, through analysis of experimental corpora of American English. Predictability was variously defined as discourse mention, utterance probability, and semantic focus. The results revealed consistent effects of utterance probability and semantic focus on F0, in the expected direction: less predictable words were produced with a higher F0 than more predictable words. However, no effect of discourse mention was observed. These results provide further empirical support for the generalization that phonetic prominence is inversely related to linguistic predictability. In addition, the divergent results for different predictability measures suggests that the parameterization of predictability within a particular experimental design can have significant impact on the interpretation of results, and that it cannot be assumed that two measures necessarily reflect the same cognitive reality.</abstract><cop>London, England</cop><pub>SAGE Publications</pub><pmid>28326986</pmid><doi>10.1177/0023830916647079</doi><tpages>31</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0023-8309 |
ispartof | Language and speech, 2017-03, Vol.60 (1), p.123-153 |
issn | 0023-8309 1756-6053 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1880084199 |
source | MEDLINE; SAGE Complete |
subjects | Acoustic Stimulation Cognition Cues English Fundamental frequency Humans Intonation North American English Phonetics Phonology Pitch Perception Research Design Semantics Semiotics Speech Acoustics Speech Intelligibility Speech Perception Speech production Speech Production Measurement Time Factors Voice Quality |
title | The Role of Predictability in Intonational Variability |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-10T23%3A26%3A26IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20Role%20of%20Predictability%20in%20Intonational%20Variability&rft.jtitle=Language%20and%20speech&rft.au=Turnbull,%20Rory&rft.date=2017-03&rft.volume=60&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=123&rft.epage=153&rft.pages=123-153&rft.issn=0023-8309&rft.eissn=1756-6053&rft_id=info:doi/10.1177/0023830916647079&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1880084199%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1891765234&rft_id=info:pmid/28326986&rft_sage_id=10.1177_0023830916647079&rfr_iscdi=true |