Closed-form solution of well-known Hencky problem without small-rotation-angle assumption

In this paper, the well‐known Hencky problem, the large deflection problem of axisymmetric deformation of uniformly loaded circular membranes, was resolved, where the small‐rotation‐angle assumption usually adopted in membrane problems was given up. The presented closed‐form solution has a higher ac...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Zeitschrift für angewandte Mathematik und Mechanik 2016-12, Vol.96 (12), p.1434-1441
Hauptverfasser: Lian, Yong-sheng, Sun, Jun-yi, Yang, Zhi-xin, He, Xiao-ting, Zheng, Zhou-lian
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 1441
container_issue 12
container_start_page 1434
container_title Zeitschrift für angewandte Mathematik und Mechanik
container_volume 96
creator Lian, Yong-sheng
Sun, Jun-yi
Yang, Zhi-xin
He, Xiao-ting
Zheng, Zhou-lian
description In this paper, the well‐known Hencky problem, the large deflection problem of axisymmetric deformation of uniformly loaded circular membranes, was resolved, where the small‐rotation‐angle assumption usually adopted in membrane problems was given up. The presented closed‐form solution has a higher accuracy than well‐known Hencky solution, a better understanding of the non‐linear behavior of the considered problem could thus be reached. The presented numerical example shows that, the important integral constant controlling differential equations should change along with the increase of the applied transverse loads, but in well‐known Hencky solution it becomes a constant due to the adopted small‐rotation‐angle assumption, resulting in the calculation error to increase, especially when the applied transverse loads is relatively large the well‐known Hencky solution will no longer apply. The presented closed‐form solution has a higher accuracy than well‐known Hencky solution, a better understanding of the non‐linear behavior of the considered problem could thus be reached. The presented numerical example shows that, the important integral constant controlling differential equations should change along with the increase of the applied transverse loads, but in well‐known Hencky solution it becomes a constant due to the adopted small‐rotation‐angle assumption, resulting in the calculation error to increase, especially when the applied transverse loads is relatively large the well‐known Hencky solution will no longer apply.
doi_str_mv 10.1002/zamm.201600059
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1880031872</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>4268879051</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3889-411934bf69177b47afc85923ad8e7b5551a31e84671a6c2476fad5e0ddc2d2af3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkM1LwzAYh4MoOKdXzwUvXjLz5qNpjzJ0E7aJoIheQtam2q1tZtIy519vxmSIF0-B8DwvPx6EzoEMgBB69aXrekAJxIQQkR6gHggKmBMCh6hHCOeY0lgeoxPvFwGBFFgPvQwr602OC-vqyNuqa0vbRLaI1qaq8LKx6yYamyZbbqKVs_PK1NG6bN9t10a-1gFxttVbB-vmrTKR9r6rV9uPU3RU6Mqbs5-3j55ubx6HYzy5H90Nryc4Y0mSYg6QMj4v4hSknHOpiywRKWU6T4ycCyFAMzAJjyXoOKNcxoXOhSF5ntGc6oL10eXubtj30Rnfqrr0WVivG2M7ryBJCGGQSBrQiz_ownauCesCxYUgIQkP1GBHZc5670yhVq6stdsoIGpbWm1Lq33pIKQ7YV1WZvMPrV6vp9PfLt65pW_N597VbqliyaRQz7OREqmcjEcPMzVm37xIkig</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1845509134</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Closed-form solution of well-known Hencky problem without small-rotation-angle assumption</title><source>Access via Wiley Online Library</source><creator>Lian, Yong-sheng ; Sun, Jun-yi ; Yang, Zhi-xin ; He, Xiao-ting ; Zheng, Zhou-lian</creator><creatorcontrib>Lian, Yong-sheng ; Sun, Jun-yi ; Yang, Zhi-xin ; He, Xiao-ting ; Zheng, Zhou-lian</creatorcontrib><description>In this paper, the well‐known Hencky problem, the large deflection problem of axisymmetric deformation of uniformly loaded circular membranes, was resolved, where the small‐rotation‐angle assumption usually adopted in membrane problems was given up. The presented closed‐form solution has a higher accuracy than well‐known Hencky solution, a better understanding of the non‐linear behavior of the considered problem could thus be reached. The presented numerical example shows that, the important integral constant controlling differential equations should change along with the increase of the applied transverse loads, but in well‐known Hencky solution it becomes a constant due to the adopted small‐rotation‐angle assumption, resulting in the calculation error to increase, especially when the applied transverse loads is relatively large the well‐known Hencky solution will no longer apply. The presented closed‐form solution has a higher accuracy than well‐known Hencky solution, a better understanding of the non‐linear behavior of the considered problem could thus be reached. The presented numerical example shows that, the important integral constant controlling differential equations should change along with the increase of the applied transverse loads, but in well‐known Hencky solution it becomes a constant due to the adopted small‐rotation‐angle assumption, resulting in the calculation error to increase, especially when the applied transverse loads is relatively large the well‐known Hencky solution will no longer apply.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0044-2267</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1521-4001</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1002/zamm.201600059</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Weinheim: Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><subject>Circular membrane ; closed-form solution ; Constants ; Differential equations ; Economic models ; Exact solutions ; Integrals ; large deflection ; Mathematical analysis ; Mathematical models ; Nonlinearity ; small-rotation-angle assumption ; Transverse loads ; uniformly loading</subject><ispartof>Zeitschrift für angewandte Mathematik und Mechanik, 2016-12, Vol.96 (12), p.1434-1441</ispartof><rights>2016 WILEY‐VCH Verlag GmbH &amp; Co. KGaA, Weinheim</rights><rights>Copyright © 2016 WILEY-VCH Verlag GmbH &amp; Co. KGaA, Weinheim</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3889-411934bf69177b47afc85923ad8e7b5551a31e84671a6c2476fad5e0ddc2d2af3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3889-411934bf69177b47afc85923ad8e7b5551a31e84671a6c2476fad5e0ddc2d2af3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002%2Fzamm.201600059$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002%2Fzamm.201600059$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,1417,27924,27925,45574,45575</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Lian, Yong-sheng</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sun, Jun-yi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yang, Zhi-xin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>He, Xiao-ting</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zheng, Zhou-lian</creatorcontrib><title>Closed-form solution of well-known Hencky problem without small-rotation-angle assumption</title><title>Zeitschrift für angewandte Mathematik und Mechanik</title><addtitle>Z. Angew. Math. Mech</addtitle><description>In this paper, the well‐known Hencky problem, the large deflection problem of axisymmetric deformation of uniformly loaded circular membranes, was resolved, where the small‐rotation‐angle assumption usually adopted in membrane problems was given up. The presented closed‐form solution has a higher accuracy than well‐known Hencky solution, a better understanding of the non‐linear behavior of the considered problem could thus be reached. The presented numerical example shows that, the important integral constant controlling differential equations should change along with the increase of the applied transverse loads, but in well‐known Hencky solution it becomes a constant due to the adopted small‐rotation‐angle assumption, resulting in the calculation error to increase, especially when the applied transverse loads is relatively large the well‐known Hencky solution will no longer apply. The presented closed‐form solution has a higher accuracy than well‐known Hencky solution, a better understanding of the non‐linear behavior of the considered problem could thus be reached. The presented numerical example shows that, the important integral constant controlling differential equations should change along with the increase of the applied transverse loads, but in well‐known Hencky solution it becomes a constant due to the adopted small‐rotation‐angle assumption, resulting in the calculation error to increase, especially when the applied transverse loads is relatively large the well‐known Hencky solution will no longer apply.</description><subject>Circular membrane</subject><subject>closed-form solution</subject><subject>Constants</subject><subject>Differential equations</subject><subject>Economic models</subject><subject>Exact solutions</subject><subject>Integrals</subject><subject>large deflection</subject><subject>Mathematical analysis</subject><subject>Mathematical models</subject><subject>Nonlinearity</subject><subject>small-rotation-angle assumption</subject><subject>Transverse loads</subject><subject>uniformly loading</subject><issn>0044-2267</issn><issn>1521-4001</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2016</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqFkM1LwzAYh4MoOKdXzwUvXjLz5qNpjzJ0E7aJoIheQtam2q1tZtIy519vxmSIF0-B8DwvPx6EzoEMgBB69aXrekAJxIQQkR6gHggKmBMCh6hHCOeY0lgeoxPvFwGBFFgPvQwr602OC-vqyNuqa0vbRLaI1qaq8LKx6yYamyZbbqKVs_PK1NG6bN9t10a-1gFxttVbB-vmrTKR9r6rV9uPU3RU6Mqbs5-3j55ubx6HYzy5H90Nryc4Y0mSYg6QMj4v4hSknHOpiywRKWU6T4ycCyFAMzAJjyXoOKNcxoXOhSF5ntGc6oL10eXubtj30Rnfqrr0WVivG2M7ryBJCGGQSBrQiz_ownauCesCxYUgIQkP1GBHZc5670yhVq6stdsoIGpbWm1Lq33pIKQ7YV1WZvMPrV6vp9PfLt65pW_N597VbqliyaRQz7OREqmcjEcPMzVm37xIkig</recordid><startdate>201612</startdate><enddate>201612</enddate><creator>Lian, Yong-sheng</creator><creator>Sun, Jun-yi</creator><creator>Yang, Zhi-xin</creator><creator>He, Xiao-ting</creator><creator>Zheng, Zhou-lian</creator><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7SC</scope><scope>7TB</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>JQ2</scope><scope>KR7</scope><scope>L7M</scope><scope>L~C</scope><scope>L~D</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201612</creationdate><title>Closed-form solution of well-known Hencky problem without small-rotation-angle assumption</title><author>Lian, Yong-sheng ; Sun, Jun-yi ; Yang, Zhi-xin ; He, Xiao-ting ; Zheng, Zhou-lian</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3889-411934bf69177b47afc85923ad8e7b5551a31e84671a6c2476fad5e0ddc2d2af3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2016</creationdate><topic>Circular membrane</topic><topic>closed-form solution</topic><topic>Constants</topic><topic>Differential equations</topic><topic>Economic models</topic><topic>Exact solutions</topic><topic>Integrals</topic><topic>large deflection</topic><topic>Mathematical analysis</topic><topic>Mathematical models</topic><topic>Nonlinearity</topic><topic>small-rotation-angle assumption</topic><topic>Transverse loads</topic><topic>uniformly loading</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Lian, Yong-sheng</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sun, Jun-yi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yang, Zhi-xin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>He, Xiao-ting</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zheng, Zhou-lian</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts</collection><collection>Mechanical &amp; Transportation Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Computer Science Collection</collection><collection>Civil Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts – Academic</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts Professional</collection><jtitle>Zeitschrift für angewandte Mathematik und Mechanik</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Lian, Yong-sheng</au><au>Sun, Jun-yi</au><au>Yang, Zhi-xin</au><au>He, Xiao-ting</au><au>Zheng, Zhou-lian</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Closed-form solution of well-known Hencky problem without small-rotation-angle assumption</atitle><jtitle>Zeitschrift für angewandte Mathematik und Mechanik</jtitle><addtitle>Z. Angew. Math. Mech</addtitle><date>2016-12</date><risdate>2016</risdate><volume>96</volume><issue>12</issue><spage>1434</spage><epage>1441</epage><pages>1434-1441</pages><issn>0044-2267</issn><eissn>1521-4001</eissn><abstract>In this paper, the well‐known Hencky problem, the large deflection problem of axisymmetric deformation of uniformly loaded circular membranes, was resolved, where the small‐rotation‐angle assumption usually adopted in membrane problems was given up. The presented closed‐form solution has a higher accuracy than well‐known Hencky solution, a better understanding of the non‐linear behavior of the considered problem could thus be reached. The presented numerical example shows that, the important integral constant controlling differential equations should change along with the increase of the applied transverse loads, but in well‐known Hencky solution it becomes a constant due to the adopted small‐rotation‐angle assumption, resulting in the calculation error to increase, especially when the applied transverse loads is relatively large the well‐known Hencky solution will no longer apply. The presented closed‐form solution has a higher accuracy than well‐known Hencky solution, a better understanding of the non‐linear behavior of the considered problem could thus be reached. The presented numerical example shows that, the important integral constant controlling differential equations should change along with the increase of the applied transverse loads, but in well‐known Hencky solution it becomes a constant due to the adopted small‐rotation‐angle assumption, resulting in the calculation error to increase, especially when the applied transverse loads is relatively large the well‐known Hencky solution will no longer apply.</abstract><cop>Weinheim</cop><pub>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</pub><doi>10.1002/zamm.201600059</doi><tpages>8</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0044-2267
ispartof Zeitschrift für angewandte Mathematik und Mechanik, 2016-12, Vol.96 (12), p.1434-1441
issn 0044-2267
1521-4001
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1880031872
source Access via Wiley Online Library
subjects Circular membrane
closed-form solution
Constants
Differential equations
Economic models
Exact solutions
Integrals
large deflection
Mathematical analysis
Mathematical models
Nonlinearity
small-rotation-angle assumption
Transverse loads
uniformly loading
title Closed-form solution of well-known Hencky problem without small-rotation-angle assumption
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-24T19%3A31%3A18IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Closed-form%20solution%20of%20well-known%20Hencky%20problem%20without%20small-rotation-angle%20assumption&rft.jtitle=Zeitschrift%20f%C3%BCr%20angewandte%20Mathematik%20und%20Mechanik&rft.au=Lian,%20Yong-sheng&rft.date=2016-12&rft.volume=96&rft.issue=12&rft.spage=1434&rft.epage=1441&rft.pages=1434-1441&rft.issn=0044-2267&rft.eissn=1521-4001&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002/zamm.201600059&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E4268879051%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1845509134&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true