Some guidance on conducting and reporting qualitative studies
This paper sets out to address the problem of the imbalance between the number of quantitative and qualitative articles published in highly ranked research journals, by providing guidelines for the design, implementation and reporting of qualitative research. Clarification is provided of key terms (...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Computers and education 2017-03, Vol.106, p.A1-A9 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | A9 |
---|---|
container_issue | |
container_start_page | A1 |
container_title | Computers and education |
container_volume | 106 |
creator | Twining, Peter Heller, Rachelle S. Nussbaum, Miguel Tsai, Chin-Chung |
description | This paper sets out to address the problem of the imbalance between the number of quantitative and qualitative articles published in highly ranked research journals, by providing guidelines for the design, implementation and reporting of qualitative research. Clarification is provided of key terms (such as quantitative and qualitative) and the interrelationships between them. The relative risks and benefits of using guidelines for qualitative research are considered, and the importance of using any such guidelines flexibly is highlighted. The proposed guidelines are based on a synthesis of existing guidelines and syntheses of guidelines from a range of fields. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.compedu.2016.12.002 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1880020533</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0360131516302445</els_id><sourcerecordid>1880020533</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c389t-b651abbfad1cc3bbcbfc4713f8ac51e79a1220ca51d1dd18b8b976e3354dce743</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkE9LxDAUxIMouK5-BKFHL615TdNmDyKy-A8WPKjgLaQvr0uWttlNWsFvb9fdu6dhYGZgfoxdA8-AQ3m7ydB3W7Jjlk82gzzjPD9hM1CVSCuVf52yGRclT0GAPGcXMW4450VZyBm7e_cdJevRWdMjJb5P0Pd2xMH168T0Ngm09eHP7UbTusEM7puSOIzWUbxkZ41pI10ddc4-nx4_li_p6u35dfmwSlGoxZDWpQRT142xgCjqGusGiwpEowxKoGphIM85GgkWrAVVq3pRlSSELCxSVYg5uznsboPfjRQH3bmI1LamJz9GDUpNl7kUYorKQxSDjzFQo7fBdSb8aOB6j0tv9BGX3uPSkOupO_XuDz2afnw7Cjqio4mJdYFw0Na7fxZ-AajUd6M</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1880020533</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Some guidance on conducting and reporting qualitative studies</title><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals</source><creator>Twining, Peter ; Heller, Rachelle S. ; Nussbaum, Miguel ; Tsai, Chin-Chung</creator><creatorcontrib>Twining, Peter ; Heller, Rachelle S. ; Nussbaum, Miguel ; Tsai, Chin-Chung</creatorcontrib><description>This paper sets out to address the problem of the imbalance between the number of quantitative and qualitative articles published in highly ranked research journals, by providing guidelines for the design, implementation and reporting of qualitative research. Clarification is provided of key terms (such as quantitative and qualitative) and the interrelationships between them. The relative risks and benefits of using guidelines for qualitative research are considered, and the importance of using any such guidelines flexibly is highlighted. The proposed guidelines are based on a synthesis of existing guidelines and syntheses of guidelines from a range of fields.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0360-1315</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1873-782X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.compedu.2016.12.002</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>Education ; Guidelines ; Qualitative ; Quantitative ; Reporting ; Risk ; Synthesis ; Theoretical stance</subject><ispartof>Computers and education, 2017-03, Vol.106, p.A1-A9</ispartof><rights>2016 Elsevier Ltd</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c389t-b651abbfad1cc3bbcbfc4713f8ac51e79a1220ca51d1dd18b8b976e3354dce743</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c389t-b651abbfad1cc3bbcbfc4713f8ac51e79a1220ca51d1dd18b8b976e3354dce743</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0360131516302445$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,3537,27901,27902,65306</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Twining, Peter</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Heller, Rachelle S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nussbaum, Miguel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tsai, Chin-Chung</creatorcontrib><title>Some guidance on conducting and reporting qualitative studies</title><title>Computers and education</title><description>This paper sets out to address the problem of the imbalance between the number of quantitative and qualitative articles published in highly ranked research journals, by providing guidelines for the design, implementation and reporting of qualitative research. Clarification is provided of key terms (such as quantitative and qualitative) and the interrelationships between them. The relative risks and benefits of using guidelines for qualitative research are considered, and the importance of using any such guidelines flexibly is highlighted. The proposed guidelines are based on a synthesis of existing guidelines and syntheses of guidelines from a range of fields.</description><subject>Education</subject><subject>Guidelines</subject><subject>Qualitative</subject><subject>Quantitative</subject><subject>Reporting</subject><subject>Risk</subject><subject>Synthesis</subject><subject>Theoretical stance</subject><issn>0360-1315</issn><issn>1873-782X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2017</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqFkE9LxDAUxIMouK5-BKFHL615TdNmDyKy-A8WPKjgLaQvr0uWttlNWsFvb9fdu6dhYGZgfoxdA8-AQ3m7ydB3W7Jjlk82gzzjPD9hM1CVSCuVf52yGRclT0GAPGcXMW4450VZyBm7e_cdJevRWdMjJb5P0Pd2xMH168T0Ngm09eHP7UbTusEM7puSOIzWUbxkZ41pI10ddc4-nx4_li_p6u35dfmwSlGoxZDWpQRT142xgCjqGusGiwpEowxKoGphIM85GgkWrAVVq3pRlSSELCxSVYg5uznsboPfjRQH3bmI1LamJz9GDUpNl7kUYorKQxSDjzFQo7fBdSb8aOB6j0tv9BGX3uPSkOupO_XuDz2afnw7Cjqio4mJdYFw0Na7fxZ-AajUd6M</recordid><startdate>201703</startdate><enddate>201703</enddate><creator>Twining, Peter</creator><creator>Heller, Rachelle S.</creator><creator>Nussbaum, Miguel</creator><creator>Tsai, Chin-Chung</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7SC</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>JQ2</scope><scope>L7M</scope><scope>L~C</scope><scope>L~D</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201703</creationdate><title>Some guidance on conducting and reporting qualitative studies</title><author>Twining, Peter ; Heller, Rachelle S. ; Nussbaum, Miguel ; Tsai, Chin-Chung</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c389t-b651abbfad1cc3bbcbfc4713f8ac51e79a1220ca51d1dd18b8b976e3354dce743</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2017</creationdate><topic>Education</topic><topic>Guidelines</topic><topic>Qualitative</topic><topic>Quantitative</topic><topic>Reporting</topic><topic>Risk</topic><topic>Synthesis</topic><topic>Theoretical stance</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Twining, Peter</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Heller, Rachelle S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nussbaum, Miguel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tsai, Chin-Chung</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Computer Science Collection</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts Academic</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts Professional</collection><jtitle>Computers and education</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Twining, Peter</au><au>Heller, Rachelle S.</au><au>Nussbaum, Miguel</au><au>Tsai, Chin-Chung</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Some guidance on conducting and reporting qualitative studies</atitle><jtitle>Computers and education</jtitle><date>2017-03</date><risdate>2017</risdate><volume>106</volume><spage>A1</spage><epage>A9</epage><pages>A1-A9</pages><issn>0360-1315</issn><eissn>1873-782X</eissn><abstract>This paper sets out to address the problem of the imbalance between the number of quantitative and qualitative articles published in highly ranked research journals, by providing guidelines for the design, implementation and reporting of qualitative research. Clarification is provided of key terms (such as quantitative and qualitative) and the interrelationships between them. The relative risks and benefits of using guidelines for qualitative research are considered, and the importance of using any such guidelines flexibly is highlighted. The proposed guidelines are based on a synthesis of existing guidelines and syntheses of guidelines from a range of fields.</abstract><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><doi>10.1016/j.compedu.2016.12.002</doi><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0360-1315 |
ispartof | Computers and education, 2017-03, Vol.106, p.A1-A9 |
issn | 0360-1315 1873-782X |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1880020533 |
source | Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals |
subjects | Education Guidelines Qualitative Quantitative Reporting Risk Synthesis Theoretical stance |
title | Some guidance on conducting and reporting qualitative studies |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-02T16%3A44%3A25IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Some%20guidance%20on%20conducting%20and%20reporting%20qualitative%20studies&rft.jtitle=Computers%20and%20education&rft.au=Twining,%20Peter&rft.date=2017-03&rft.volume=106&rft.spage=A1&rft.epage=A9&rft.pages=A1-A9&rft.issn=0360-1315&rft.eissn=1873-782X&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.compedu.2016.12.002&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1880020533%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1880020533&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_els_id=S0360131516302445&rfr_iscdi=true |