Empirical Models of the Azimuthal Reception Angle—Part I: Comparative Analysis of Empirical Models for Different Propagation Environments

Statistical properties of the reception angle have a significant impact on the choice of the antenna system patterns and decide on the received signal-processing methods. For angle of arrival in azimuth plane, comparative analysis of the empirical models and the approximation error evaluation are th...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Wireless personal communications 2016-11, Vol.91 (2), p.771-791
Hauptverfasser: Ziółkowski, Cezary, Kelner, Jan M.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 791
container_issue 2
container_start_page 771
container_title Wireless personal communications
container_volume 91
creator Ziółkowski, Cezary
Kelner, Jan M.
description Statistical properties of the reception angle have a significant impact on the choice of the antenna system patterns and decide on the received signal-processing methods. For angle of arrival in azimuth plane, comparative analysis of the empirical models and the approximation error evaluation are the purpose of this paper. Here, the presented analysis is focused on models such as the von Mises, modified Gaussian, modified Laplacian, and modified logistic. For each model, the approximation accuracy is determined with respect to measurement data for seven different propagation scenarios. The measures such as the least-squares error, difference of standard deviations, Kolmogorov–Smirnov statistic, and Cramer–von Mises statistic are used for evaluation of the approximation errors. Comparative analysis for four empirical models, differentiation of propagation environments, multi-criterial evaluation of approximation errors in significant degree fill a gap in the previous analysis presented in the literature. The obtained results show that the empirical models provide a better fit to the measurement data than the geometrical models, and the smallest errors of approximation are for the modified Laplacian and logistic distributions.
doi_str_mv 10.1007/s11277-016-3496-1
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1880018971</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1880018971</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c392t-722aed7b5a244b3299396892f680c5ec468b71c290a20a8bbc5e97e44712f0c3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kT9LAzEchoMoWKsfwC3g4nKa5P4kcSu1aqGiSAe3kEtzbcrd5UyuhTq5u_oJ_SSmPQdRnAIvz_vALy8ApxhdYITopceYUBohnEVxwrMI74EeTimJWJw874Me4oRHGcHkEBx5v0QotDjpgfdR1RhnlCzhvZ3p0kNbwHah4eDVVKt2EfInrXTTGlvDQT0v9efbx6N0LRxfwaGtGulka9aBr2W58WbX_-MsrIPXpii003ULH51t5FzulKN6bZytq5D7Y3BQyNLrk--3D6Y3o-nwLpo83I6Hg0mkYk7aiBIi9YzmqSRJkseE85hnjJMiY0ilWiUZyylWhCNJkGR5HkJOdZJQTAqk4j4477SNsy8r7VtRGa90Wcpa25UXmLHwPYxTHNCzX-jSrly4tKNYijLOAoU7SjnrvdOFaJyppNsIjMR2HdGtI8I6YruO2JpJ1_GBrefa_TD_W_oCs-eUIA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1880850698</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Empirical Models of the Azimuthal Reception Angle—Part I: Comparative Analysis of Empirical Models for Different Propagation Environments</title><source>Springer Nature - Complete Springer Journals</source><creator>Ziółkowski, Cezary ; Kelner, Jan M.</creator><creatorcontrib>Ziółkowski, Cezary ; Kelner, Jan M.</creatorcontrib><description>Statistical properties of the reception angle have a significant impact on the choice of the antenna system patterns and decide on the received signal-processing methods. For angle of arrival in azimuth plane, comparative analysis of the empirical models and the approximation error evaluation are the purpose of this paper. Here, the presented analysis is focused on models such as the von Mises, modified Gaussian, modified Laplacian, and modified logistic. For each model, the approximation accuracy is determined with respect to measurement data for seven different propagation scenarios. The measures such as the least-squares error, difference of standard deviations, Kolmogorov–Smirnov statistic, and Cramer–von Mises statistic are used for evaluation of the approximation errors. Comparative analysis for four empirical models, differentiation of propagation environments, multi-criterial evaluation of approximation errors in significant degree fill a gap in the previous analysis presented in the literature. The obtained results show that the empirical models provide a better fit to the measurement data than the geometrical models, and the smallest errors of approximation are for the modified Laplacian and logistic distributions.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0929-6212</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1572-834X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s11277-016-3496-1</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New York: Springer US</publisher><subject>Angle of arrival ; Approximation ; Communications Engineering ; Comparative analysis ; Computer Communication Networks ; Empirical analysis ; Engineering ; Environment models ; Error analysis ; Errors ; Evaluation ; Mathematical analysis ; Model accuracy ; Networks ; Propagation ; Signal processing ; Signal,Image and Speech Processing ; Statistical analysis ; Statistics</subject><ispartof>Wireless personal communications, 2016-11, Vol.91 (2), p.771-791</ispartof><rights>The Author(s) 2016</rights><rights>Copyright Springer Science &amp; Business Media 2016</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c392t-722aed7b5a244b3299396892f680c5ec468b71c290a20a8bbc5e97e44712f0c3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c392t-722aed7b5a244b3299396892f680c5ec468b71c290a20a8bbc5e97e44712f0c3</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-0750-0705 ; 0000-0002-3902-0784</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s11277-016-3496-1$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1007/s11277-016-3496-1$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902,41464,42533,51294</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Ziółkowski, Cezary</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kelner, Jan M.</creatorcontrib><title>Empirical Models of the Azimuthal Reception Angle—Part I: Comparative Analysis of Empirical Models for Different Propagation Environments</title><title>Wireless personal communications</title><addtitle>Wireless Pers Commun</addtitle><description>Statistical properties of the reception angle have a significant impact on the choice of the antenna system patterns and decide on the received signal-processing methods. For angle of arrival in azimuth plane, comparative analysis of the empirical models and the approximation error evaluation are the purpose of this paper. Here, the presented analysis is focused on models such as the von Mises, modified Gaussian, modified Laplacian, and modified logistic. For each model, the approximation accuracy is determined with respect to measurement data for seven different propagation scenarios. The measures such as the least-squares error, difference of standard deviations, Kolmogorov–Smirnov statistic, and Cramer–von Mises statistic are used for evaluation of the approximation errors. Comparative analysis for four empirical models, differentiation of propagation environments, multi-criterial evaluation of approximation errors in significant degree fill a gap in the previous analysis presented in the literature. The obtained results show that the empirical models provide a better fit to the measurement data than the geometrical models, and the smallest errors of approximation are for the modified Laplacian and logistic distributions.</description><subject>Angle of arrival</subject><subject>Approximation</subject><subject>Communications Engineering</subject><subject>Comparative analysis</subject><subject>Computer Communication Networks</subject><subject>Empirical analysis</subject><subject>Engineering</subject><subject>Environment models</subject><subject>Error analysis</subject><subject>Errors</subject><subject>Evaluation</subject><subject>Mathematical analysis</subject><subject>Model accuracy</subject><subject>Networks</subject><subject>Propagation</subject><subject>Signal processing</subject><subject>Signal,Image and Speech Processing</subject><subject>Statistical analysis</subject><subject>Statistics</subject><issn>0929-6212</issn><issn>1572-834X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2016</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>C6C</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kT9LAzEchoMoWKsfwC3g4nKa5P4kcSu1aqGiSAe3kEtzbcrd5UyuhTq5u_oJ_SSmPQdRnAIvz_vALy8ApxhdYITopceYUBohnEVxwrMI74EeTimJWJw874Me4oRHGcHkEBx5v0QotDjpgfdR1RhnlCzhvZ3p0kNbwHah4eDVVKt2EfInrXTTGlvDQT0v9efbx6N0LRxfwaGtGulka9aBr2W58WbX_-MsrIPXpii003ULH51t5FzulKN6bZytq5D7Y3BQyNLrk--3D6Y3o-nwLpo83I6Hg0mkYk7aiBIi9YzmqSRJkseE85hnjJMiY0ilWiUZyylWhCNJkGR5HkJOdZJQTAqk4j4477SNsy8r7VtRGa90Wcpa25UXmLHwPYxTHNCzX-jSrly4tKNYijLOAoU7SjnrvdOFaJyppNsIjMR2HdGtI8I6YruO2JpJ1_GBrefa_TD_W_oCs-eUIA</recordid><startdate>20161101</startdate><enddate>20161101</enddate><creator>Ziółkowski, Cezary</creator><creator>Kelner, Jan M.</creator><general>Springer US</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>C6C</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7SC</scope><scope>7SP</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>JQ2</scope><scope>L7M</scope><scope>L~C</scope><scope>L~D</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0750-0705</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3902-0784</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20161101</creationdate><title>Empirical Models of the Azimuthal Reception Angle—Part I: Comparative Analysis of Empirical Models for Different Propagation Environments</title><author>Ziółkowski, Cezary ; Kelner, Jan M.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c392t-722aed7b5a244b3299396892f680c5ec468b71c290a20a8bbc5e97e44712f0c3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2016</creationdate><topic>Angle of arrival</topic><topic>Approximation</topic><topic>Communications Engineering</topic><topic>Comparative analysis</topic><topic>Computer Communication Networks</topic><topic>Empirical analysis</topic><topic>Engineering</topic><topic>Environment models</topic><topic>Error analysis</topic><topic>Errors</topic><topic>Evaluation</topic><topic>Mathematical analysis</topic><topic>Model accuracy</topic><topic>Networks</topic><topic>Propagation</topic><topic>Signal processing</topic><topic>Signal,Image and Speech Processing</topic><topic>Statistical analysis</topic><topic>Statistics</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Ziółkowski, Cezary</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kelner, Jan M.</creatorcontrib><collection>Springer Nature OA Free Journals</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts</collection><collection>Electronics &amp; Communications Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Computer Science Collection</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts – Academic</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts Professional</collection><jtitle>Wireless personal communications</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Ziółkowski, Cezary</au><au>Kelner, Jan M.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Empirical Models of the Azimuthal Reception Angle—Part I: Comparative Analysis of Empirical Models for Different Propagation Environments</atitle><jtitle>Wireless personal communications</jtitle><stitle>Wireless Pers Commun</stitle><date>2016-11-01</date><risdate>2016</risdate><volume>91</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>771</spage><epage>791</epage><pages>771-791</pages><issn>0929-6212</issn><eissn>1572-834X</eissn><abstract>Statistical properties of the reception angle have a significant impact on the choice of the antenna system patterns and decide on the received signal-processing methods. For angle of arrival in azimuth plane, comparative analysis of the empirical models and the approximation error evaluation are the purpose of this paper. Here, the presented analysis is focused on models such as the von Mises, modified Gaussian, modified Laplacian, and modified logistic. For each model, the approximation accuracy is determined with respect to measurement data for seven different propagation scenarios. The measures such as the least-squares error, difference of standard deviations, Kolmogorov–Smirnov statistic, and Cramer–von Mises statistic are used for evaluation of the approximation errors. Comparative analysis for four empirical models, differentiation of propagation environments, multi-criterial evaluation of approximation errors in significant degree fill a gap in the previous analysis presented in the literature. The obtained results show that the empirical models provide a better fit to the measurement data than the geometrical models, and the smallest errors of approximation are for the modified Laplacian and logistic distributions.</abstract><cop>New York</cop><pub>Springer US</pub><doi>10.1007/s11277-016-3496-1</doi><tpages>21</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0750-0705</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3902-0784</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0929-6212
ispartof Wireless personal communications, 2016-11, Vol.91 (2), p.771-791
issn 0929-6212
1572-834X
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1880018971
source Springer Nature - Complete Springer Journals
subjects Angle of arrival
Approximation
Communications Engineering
Comparative analysis
Computer Communication Networks
Empirical analysis
Engineering
Environment models
Error analysis
Errors
Evaluation
Mathematical analysis
Model accuracy
Networks
Propagation
Signal processing
Signal,Image and Speech Processing
Statistical analysis
Statistics
title Empirical Models of the Azimuthal Reception Angle—Part I: Comparative Analysis of Empirical Models for Different Propagation Environments
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-15T19%3A24%3A25IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Empirical%20Models%20of%20the%20Azimuthal%20Reception%20Angle%E2%80%94Part%20I:%20Comparative%20Analysis%20of%20Empirical%20Models%20for%20Different%20Propagation%20Environments&rft.jtitle=Wireless%20personal%20communications&rft.au=Zi%C3%B3%C5%82kowski,%20Cezary&rft.date=2016-11-01&rft.volume=91&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=771&rft.epage=791&rft.pages=771-791&rft.issn=0929-6212&rft.eissn=1572-834X&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s11277-016-3496-1&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1880018971%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1880850698&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true