Error in digital network and basin area delineation using d8 method: A case study in a sub-basin of the Ganga

Digital elevation model (DEM) is one of the input data derived from different satellite sensors for hydrologic and hydraulic modelings. Two prime questions could be answered before using these DEMs. First, the acceptability of datasets for our use and second appropriate resolution of the dataset. Th...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of the Geological Society of India 2017, Vol.89 (1), p.65-70
Hauptverfasser: Kumar, Brijesh, Patra, Kanhu Charan, Lakshmi, Venkat
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 70
container_issue 1
container_start_page 65
container_title Journal of the Geological Society of India
container_volume 89
creator Kumar, Brijesh
Patra, Kanhu Charan
Lakshmi, Venkat
description Digital elevation model (DEM) is one of the input data derived from different satellite sensors for hydrologic and hydraulic modelings. Two prime questions could be answered before using these DEMs. First, the acceptability of datasets for our use and second appropriate resolution of the dataset. Three widely used DEMs SRTM 30m, ASTER 30m and SRTM 90m are analyzed to evaluate their suitability to delineate river network and basin boundary area. The hydrology tool of spatial analyst extension inbuilt in ArcGIS 10.2 (which uses the D8 method for calculation of flow direction) has been used for the delineation of both river networks and basin boundary. The assessment of river network alignment and boundary delineation is carried out in the seven sub-catchments of Gandak river basin having different morphological characteristics. The automatically delineated boundary area for all the three DEMs reflects a significant difference when compared with the digitized basin area from the Ganga flood control commission (GFCC) map. The maximum boundary area delineation error is 39137.20 km 2 forASTER 30m, and minimum delineation error of 13239.28 km 2 for SRTM 90m. In the stream network, delineation accuracy is good for SRTM 90m while, except Gandak trunk, ASTER 30m DEM shows better delineation accuracy indicated by mean absolute error (MAE) and standard deviation (SD).
doi_str_mv 10.1007/s12594-017-0559-1
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1880005020</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1868307775</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-a405t-76f151504f678707af7419eaedb482bf50829af4c92457f5bc20326f318f6e183</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkc1KxTAQRoso-PsA7gJu3FQnadKk7kSuV0Fwo-swbZNa7U00aZH79qbUhQjiKkPmnI-EL8tOKVxQAHkZKRMVz4HKHISocrqTHUAleV4qVe2mGWiZy5Kx_ewwxleAkoMqDrLNKgQfSO9I23f9iANxZvz04Y2ga0mNMW0wGCStGXpncOy9I1O67UiryMaML769ItekwWhIHKd2O2chiVOdL7a3ZHwxZI2uw-Nsz-IQzcn3eZQ9366ebu7yh8f1_c31Q44cxJjeaamgArgtpZIg0UpOK4OmrblitRWgWIWWNxXjQlpRNwwKVtqCKlsaqoqj7HzJfQ_-YzJx1Js-NmYY0Bk_RU2VAgABSfsfLVUBUkqR0LNf6KufgksfmSnBBON0puhCNcHHGIzV76HfYNhqCnruSi9d6dSVnrvSNDlscWJiXWfCj-Q_pS-IpZQf</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1865252415</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Error in digital network and basin area delineation using d8 method: A case study in a sub-basin of the Ganga</title><source>SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings</source><creator>Kumar, Brijesh ; Patra, Kanhu Charan ; Lakshmi, Venkat</creator><creatorcontrib>Kumar, Brijesh ; Patra, Kanhu Charan ; Lakshmi, Venkat</creatorcontrib><description>Digital elevation model (DEM) is one of the input data derived from different satellite sensors for hydrologic and hydraulic modelings. Two prime questions could be answered before using these DEMs. First, the acceptability of datasets for our use and second appropriate resolution of the dataset. Three widely used DEMs SRTM 30m, ASTER 30m and SRTM 90m are analyzed to evaluate their suitability to delineate river network and basin boundary area. The hydrology tool of spatial analyst extension inbuilt in ArcGIS 10.2 (which uses the D8 method for calculation of flow direction) has been used for the delineation of both river networks and basin boundary. The assessment of river network alignment and boundary delineation is carried out in the seven sub-catchments of Gandak river basin having different morphological characteristics. The automatically delineated boundary area for all the three DEMs reflects a significant difference when compared with the digitized basin area from the Ganga flood control commission (GFCC) map. The maximum boundary area delineation error is 39137.20 km 2 forASTER 30m, and minimum delineation error of 13239.28 km 2 for SRTM 90m. In the stream network, delineation accuracy is good for SRTM 90m while, except Gandak trunk, ASTER 30m DEM shows better delineation accuracy indicated by mean absolute error (MAE) and standard deviation (SD).</description><identifier>ISSN: 0016-7622</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 0974-6889</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s12594-017-0559-1</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Springer India: Geological Society of India</publisher><subject>Basins ; Boundaries ; Case studies ; Datasets ; Delineation ; Digital Elevation Models ; Earth and Environmental Science ; Earth Sciences ; Errors ; Flood control ; Freshwater ; Geology ; Hydrogeology ; Hydrology ; Networks ; River basins ; River networks ; Rivers ; Satellites ; Sensors ; Spatial analysis</subject><ispartof>Journal of the Geological Society of India, 2017, Vol.89 (1), p.65-70</ispartof><rights>Geological Society of India 2017</rights><rights>Journal of the Geological Society of India is a copyright of Springer, 2017.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-a405t-76f151504f678707af7419eaedb482bf50829af4c92457f5bc20326f318f6e183</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-a405t-76f151504f678707af7419eaedb482bf50829af4c92457f5bc20326f318f6e183</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s12594-017-0559-1$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1007/s12594-017-0559-1$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,777,781,27905,27906,41469,42538,51300</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Kumar, Brijesh</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Patra, Kanhu Charan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lakshmi, Venkat</creatorcontrib><title>Error in digital network and basin area delineation using d8 method: A case study in a sub-basin of the Ganga</title><title>Journal of the Geological Society of India</title><addtitle>J Geol Soc India</addtitle><description>Digital elevation model (DEM) is one of the input data derived from different satellite sensors for hydrologic and hydraulic modelings. Two prime questions could be answered before using these DEMs. First, the acceptability of datasets for our use and second appropriate resolution of the dataset. Three widely used DEMs SRTM 30m, ASTER 30m and SRTM 90m are analyzed to evaluate their suitability to delineate river network and basin boundary area. The hydrology tool of spatial analyst extension inbuilt in ArcGIS 10.2 (which uses the D8 method for calculation of flow direction) has been used for the delineation of both river networks and basin boundary. The assessment of river network alignment and boundary delineation is carried out in the seven sub-catchments of Gandak river basin having different morphological characteristics. The automatically delineated boundary area for all the three DEMs reflects a significant difference when compared with the digitized basin area from the Ganga flood control commission (GFCC) map. The maximum boundary area delineation error is 39137.20 km 2 forASTER 30m, and minimum delineation error of 13239.28 km 2 for SRTM 90m. In the stream network, delineation accuracy is good for SRTM 90m while, except Gandak trunk, ASTER 30m DEM shows better delineation accuracy indicated by mean absolute error (MAE) and standard deviation (SD).</description><subject>Basins</subject><subject>Boundaries</subject><subject>Case studies</subject><subject>Datasets</subject><subject>Delineation</subject><subject>Digital Elevation Models</subject><subject>Earth and Environmental Science</subject><subject>Earth Sciences</subject><subject>Errors</subject><subject>Flood control</subject><subject>Freshwater</subject><subject>Geology</subject><subject>Hydrogeology</subject><subject>Hydrology</subject><subject>Networks</subject><subject>River basins</subject><subject>River networks</subject><subject>Rivers</subject><subject>Satellites</subject><subject>Sensors</subject><subject>Spatial analysis</subject><issn>0016-7622</issn><issn>0974-6889</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2017</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkc1KxTAQRoso-PsA7gJu3FQnadKk7kSuV0Fwo-swbZNa7U00aZH79qbUhQjiKkPmnI-EL8tOKVxQAHkZKRMVz4HKHISocrqTHUAleV4qVe2mGWiZy5Kx_ewwxleAkoMqDrLNKgQfSO9I23f9iANxZvz04Y2ga0mNMW0wGCStGXpncOy9I1O67UiryMaML769ItekwWhIHKd2O2chiVOdL7a3ZHwxZI2uw-Nsz-IQzcn3eZQ9366ebu7yh8f1_c31Q44cxJjeaamgArgtpZIg0UpOK4OmrblitRWgWIWWNxXjQlpRNwwKVtqCKlsaqoqj7HzJfQ_-YzJx1Js-NmYY0Bk_RU2VAgABSfsfLVUBUkqR0LNf6KufgksfmSnBBON0puhCNcHHGIzV76HfYNhqCnruSi9d6dSVnrvSNDlscWJiXWfCj-Q_pS-IpZQf</recordid><startdate>2017</startdate><enddate>2017</enddate><creator>Kumar, Brijesh</creator><creator>Patra, Kanhu Charan</creator><creator>Lakshmi, Venkat</creator><general>Geological Society of India</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>04Q</scope><scope>04W</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7UA</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88I</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABJCF</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>BKSAR</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>H96</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>KR7</scope><scope>L.G</scope><scope>L6V</scope><scope>M2P</scope><scope>M7S</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PCBAR</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PTHSS</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><scope>Q9U</scope></search><sort><creationdate>2017</creationdate><title>Error in digital network and basin area delineation using d8 method: A case study in a sub-basin of the Ganga</title><author>Kumar, Brijesh ; Patra, Kanhu Charan ; Lakshmi, Venkat</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a405t-76f151504f678707af7419eaedb482bf50829af4c92457f5bc20326f318f6e183</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2017</creationdate><topic>Basins</topic><topic>Boundaries</topic><topic>Case studies</topic><topic>Datasets</topic><topic>Delineation</topic><topic>Digital Elevation Models</topic><topic>Earth and Environmental Science</topic><topic>Earth Sciences</topic><topic>Errors</topic><topic>Flood control</topic><topic>Freshwater</topic><topic>Geology</topic><topic>Hydrogeology</topic><topic>Hydrology</topic><topic>Networks</topic><topic>River basins</topic><topic>River networks</topic><topic>Rivers</topic><topic>Satellites</topic><topic>Sensors</topic><topic>Spatial analysis</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Kumar, Brijesh</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Patra, Kanhu Charan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lakshmi, Venkat</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>India Database</collection><collection>India Database: Science &amp; Technology</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Water Resources Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Materials Science &amp; Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Agricultural &amp; Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Earth, Atmospheric &amp; Aquatic Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 2: Ocean Technology, Policy &amp; Non-Living Resources</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>Civil Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><collection>ProQuest Engineering Collection</collection><collection>Science Database</collection><collection>Engineering Database</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>Earth, Atmospheric &amp; Aquatic Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>Engineering Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><jtitle>Journal of the Geological Society of India</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Kumar, Brijesh</au><au>Patra, Kanhu Charan</au><au>Lakshmi, Venkat</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Error in digital network and basin area delineation using d8 method: A case study in a sub-basin of the Ganga</atitle><jtitle>Journal of the Geological Society of India</jtitle><stitle>J Geol Soc India</stitle><date>2017</date><risdate>2017</risdate><volume>89</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>65</spage><epage>70</epage><pages>65-70</pages><issn>0016-7622</issn><eissn>0974-6889</eissn><abstract>Digital elevation model (DEM) is one of the input data derived from different satellite sensors for hydrologic and hydraulic modelings. Two prime questions could be answered before using these DEMs. First, the acceptability of datasets for our use and second appropriate resolution of the dataset. Three widely used DEMs SRTM 30m, ASTER 30m and SRTM 90m are analyzed to evaluate their suitability to delineate river network and basin boundary area. The hydrology tool of spatial analyst extension inbuilt in ArcGIS 10.2 (which uses the D8 method for calculation of flow direction) has been used for the delineation of both river networks and basin boundary. The assessment of river network alignment and boundary delineation is carried out in the seven sub-catchments of Gandak river basin having different morphological characteristics. The automatically delineated boundary area for all the three DEMs reflects a significant difference when compared with the digitized basin area from the Ganga flood control commission (GFCC) map. The maximum boundary area delineation error is 39137.20 km 2 forASTER 30m, and minimum delineation error of 13239.28 km 2 for SRTM 90m. In the stream network, delineation accuracy is good for SRTM 90m while, except Gandak trunk, ASTER 30m DEM shows better delineation accuracy indicated by mean absolute error (MAE) and standard deviation (SD).</abstract><cop>Springer India</cop><pub>Geological Society of India</pub><doi>10.1007/s12594-017-0559-1</doi><tpages>6</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0016-7622
ispartof Journal of the Geological Society of India, 2017, Vol.89 (1), p.65-70
issn 0016-7622
0974-6889
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1880005020
source SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings
subjects Basins
Boundaries
Case studies
Datasets
Delineation
Digital Elevation Models
Earth and Environmental Science
Earth Sciences
Errors
Flood control
Freshwater
Geology
Hydrogeology
Hydrology
Networks
River basins
River networks
Rivers
Satellites
Sensors
Spatial analysis
title Error in digital network and basin area delineation using d8 method: A case study in a sub-basin of the Ganga
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-18T01%3A02%3A00IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Error%20in%20digital%20network%20and%20basin%20area%20delineation%20using%20d8%20method:%20A%20case%20study%20in%20a%20sub-basin%20of%20the%20Ganga&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20the%20Geological%20Society%20of%20India&rft.au=Kumar,%20Brijesh&rft.date=2017&rft.volume=89&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=65&rft.epage=70&rft.pages=65-70&rft.issn=0016-7622&rft.eissn=0974-6889&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s12594-017-0559-1&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1868307775%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1865252415&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true