Considering the collision probability of Active Debris Removal missions
Active Debris Removal (ADR) methods are being developed due to a growing concern about the congestion on-orbit and sustainability of spaceflight. This study examined the probability of an on-orbit collision between an ADR target, whilst being de-orbited, and all the objects in the public catalogue p...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Acta astronautica 2017-02, Vol.131, p.10-17 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 17 |
---|---|
container_issue | |
container_start_page | 10 |
container_title | Acta astronautica |
container_volume | 131 |
creator | Lidtke, Aleksander A. Lewis, Hugh G. Armellin, Roberto Urrutxua, Hodei |
description | Active Debris Removal (ADR) methods are being developed due to a growing concern about the congestion on-orbit and sustainability of spaceflight. This study examined the probability of an on-orbit collision between an ADR target, whilst being de-orbited, and all the objects in the public catalogue published by the US Strategic Command. Such a collision could have significant effects because the target is likely to be located in a densely populated orbital regime and thus follow-on collisions could take place. Six impulsive and three low-thrust example ADR mission trajectories were screened for conjunctions. Extremely close conjunctions were found to result in as much as 99% of the total accumulated collision probability. The need to avoid those conjunctions is highlighted, which raises concerns about ADR methods that do not support collision avoidance. Shortening the removal missions, at an expense of more ΔV and so cost, will also lower their collision probability by reducing the number of conjunctions that they will experience.
•Longer ADR missions accumulate higher collision probabilities (PC) than shorter ones.•Up to 99% of this PC is caused by individual conjunctions with high individual PCs.•Such high PCs have to be mitigated to avoid collisions in congested orbital regimes.•Therefore, ADR must be able to conduct collision avoidance.•Accumulated PC of ADR should be traded off against the mission cost. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.actaastro.2016.11.012 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1879996967</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0094576516305434</els_id><sourcerecordid>1879996967</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c458t-529a835da567a4c10139b54534292cf15698076ba6b74b530f2fa916bde797be3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkU1LxDAQhoMouK7-BgtevLQmbT6a47LqKgiC6Dkk6VRTus2adBf235uy4sGLngaGZ4b3A6FLgguCCb_pCm1HreMYfFGmRUFIgUl5hGakFjIvcYWP0QxjSXMmODtFZzF2GGNR1nKGVks_RNdAcMN7Nn5AZn3fu-j8kG2CN9q43o37zLfZwo5uB9ktmOBi9gJrv9N9tnZxguM5Oml1H-Hie87R2_3d6_Ihf3pePS4XT7mlrB5zVkpdV6zRjAtNbTJQScMoq2gpS9sSxmWNBTeaG0ENq3BbtloSbhoQUhio5uj68Dep-9xCHFVSYKHv9QB-G9XkWUouufgHyiQVlEmS0KtfaOe3YUhGFJFVirCWFCdKHCgbfIwBWrUJbq3DXhGspi5Up366UFMXihCVukiXi8MlpGh2DoKK1sFgoXEB7Kga7_788QV-1JVN</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1932038940</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Considering the collision probability of Active Debris Removal missions</title><source>Access via ScienceDirect (Elsevier)</source><creator>Lidtke, Aleksander A. ; Lewis, Hugh G. ; Armellin, Roberto ; Urrutxua, Hodei</creator><creatorcontrib>Lidtke, Aleksander A. ; Lewis, Hugh G. ; Armellin, Roberto ; Urrutxua, Hodei</creatorcontrib><description>Active Debris Removal (ADR) methods are being developed due to a growing concern about the congestion on-orbit and sustainability of spaceflight. This study examined the probability of an on-orbit collision between an ADR target, whilst being de-orbited, and all the objects in the public catalogue published by the US Strategic Command. Such a collision could have significant effects because the target is likely to be located in a densely populated orbital regime and thus follow-on collisions could take place. Six impulsive and three low-thrust example ADR mission trajectories were screened for conjunctions. Extremely close conjunctions were found to result in as much as 99% of the total accumulated collision probability. The need to avoid those conjunctions is highlighted, which raises concerns about ADR methods that do not support collision avoidance. Shortening the removal missions, at an expense of more ΔV and so cost, will also lower their collision probability by reducing the number of conjunctions that they will experience.
•Longer ADR missions accumulate higher collision probabilities (PC) than shorter ones.•Up to 99% of this PC is caused by individual conjunctions with high individual PCs.•Such high PCs have to be mitigated to avoid collisions in congested orbital regimes.•Therefore, ADR must be able to conduct collision avoidance.•Accumulated PC of ADR should be traded off against the mission cost.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0094-5765</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1879-2030</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.actaastro.2016.11.012</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Elmsford: Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>Active Debris Removal ; Aerospace environments ; Catalogues ; Collision avoidance ; Collision dynamics ; Collision probability ; Collisions ; Congestion ; Conjunction detection ; Cost engineering ; Debris ; Detritus ; Extreme values ; Missions ; Orbits ; Population density ; Probability ; Risk ; Space debris ; Space environment ; Space flight ; Spacecraft ; Sustainability</subject><ispartof>Acta astronautica, 2017-02, Vol.131, p.10-17</ispartof><rights>2016</rights><rights>Copyright Elsevier BV Feb 2017</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c458t-529a835da567a4c10139b54534292cf15698076ba6b74b530f2fa916bde797be3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c458t-529a835da567a4c10139b54534292cf15698076ba6b74b530f2fa916bde797be3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.actaastro.2016.11.012$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,3550,27924,27925,45995</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Lidtke, Aleksander A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lewis, Hugh G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Armellin, Roberto</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Urrutxua, Hodei</creatorcontrib><title>Considering the collision probability of Active Debris Removal missions</title><title>Acta astronautica</title><description>Active Debris Removal (ADR) methods are being developed due to a growing concern about the congestion on-orbit and sustainability of spaceflight. This study examined the probability of an on-orbit collision between an ADR target, whilst being de-orbited, and all the objects in the public catalogue published by the US Strategic Command. Such a collision could have significant effects because the target is likely to be located in a densely populated orbital regime and thus follow-on collisions could take place. Six impulsive and three low-thrust example ADR mission trajectories were screened for conjunctions. Extremely close conjunctions were found to result in as much as 99% of the total accumulated collision probability. The need to avoid those conjunctions is highlighted, which raises concerns about ADR methods that do not support collision avoidance. Shortening the removal missions, at an expense of more ΔV and so cost, will also lower their collision probability by reducing the number of conjunctions that they will experience.
•Longer ADR missions accumulate higher collision probabilities (PC) than shorter ones.•Up to 99% of this PC is caused by individual conjunctions with high individual PCs.•Such high PCs have to be mitigated to avoid collisions in congested orbital regimes.•Therefore, ADR must be able to conduct collision avoidance.•Accumulated PC of ADR should be traded off against the mission cost.</description><subject>Active Debris Removal</subject><subject>Aerospace environments</subject><subject>Catalogues</subject><subject>Collision avoidance</subject><subject>Collision dynamics</subject><subject>Collision probability</subject><subject>Collisions</subject><subject>Congestion</subject><subject>Conjunction detection</subject><subject>Cost engineering</subject><subject>Debris</subject><subject>Detritus</subject><subject>Extreme values</subject><subject>Missions</subject><subject>Orbits</subject><subject>Population density</subject><subject>Probability</subject><subject>Risk</subject><subject>Space debris</subject><subject>Space environment</subject><subject>Space flight</subject><subject>Spacecraft</subject><subject>Sustainability</subject><issn>0094-5765</issn><issn>1879-2030</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2017</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqNkU1LxDAQhoMouK7-BgtevLQmbT6a47LqKgiC6Dkk6VRTus2adBf235uy4sGLngaGZ4b3A6FLgguCCb_pCm1HreMYfFGmRUFIgUl5hGakFjIvcYWP0QxjSXMmODtFZzF2GGNR1nKGVks_RNdAcMN7Nn5AZn3fu-j8kG2CN9q43o37zLfZwo5uB9ktmOBi9gJrv9N9tnZxguM5Oml1H-Hie87R2_3d6_Ihf3pePS4XT7mlrB5zVkpdV6zRjAtNbTJQScMoq2gpS9sSxmWNBTeaG0ENq3BbtloSbhoQUhio5uj68Dep-9xCHFVSYKHv9QB-G9XkWUouufgHyiQVlEmS0KtfaOe3YUhGFJFVirCWFCdKHCgbfIwBWrUJbq3DXhGspi5Up366UFMXihCVukiXi8MlpGh2DoKK1sFgoXEB7Kga7_788QV-1JVN</recordid><startdate>201702</startdate><enddate>201702</enddate><creator>Lidtke, Aleksander A.</creator><creator>Lewis, Hugh G.</creator><creator>Armellin, Roberto</creator><creator>Urrutxua, Hodei</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><general>Elsevier BV</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7TB</scope><scope>7TG</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>H8D</scope><scope>KL.</scope><scope>L7M</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201702</creationdate><title>Considering the collision probability of Active Debris Removal missions</title><author>Lidtke, Aleksander A. ; Lewis, Hugh G. ; Armellin, Roberto ; Urrutxua, Hodei</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c458t-529a835da567a4c10139b54534292cf15698076ba6b74b530f2fa916bde797be3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2017</creationdate><topic>Active Debris Removal</topic><topic>Aerospace environments</topic><topic>Catalogues</topic><topic>Collision avoidance</topic><topic>Collision dynamics</topic><topic>Collision probability</topic><topic>Collisions</topic><topic>Congestion</topic><topic>Conjunction detection</topic><topic>Cost engineering</topic><topic>Debris</topic><topic>Detritus</topic><topic>Extreme values</topic><topic>Missions</topic><topic>Orbits</topic><topic>Population density</topic><topic>Probability</topic><topic>Risk</topic><topic>Space debris</topic><topic>Space environment</topic><topic>Space flight</topic><topic>Spacecraft</topic><topic>Sustainability</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Lidtke, Aleksander A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lewis, Hugh G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Armellin, Roberto</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Urrutxua, Hodei</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Mechanical & Transportation Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Meteorological & Geoastrophysical Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Aerospace Database</collection><collection>Meteorological & Geoastrophysical Abstracts - Academic</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace</collection><jtitle>Acta astronautica</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Lidtke, Aleksander A.</au><au>Lewis, Hugh G.</au><au>Armellin, Roberto</au><au>Urrutxua, Hodei</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Considering the collision probability of Active Debris Removal missions</atitle><jtitle>Acta astronautica</jtitle><date>2017-02</date><risdate>2017</risdate><volume>131</volume><spage>10</spage><epage>17</epage><pages>10-17</pages><issn>0094-5765</issn><eissn>1879-2030</eissn><abstract>Active Debris Removal (ADR) methods are being developed due to a growing concern about the congestion on-orbit and sustainability of spaceflight. This study examined the probability of an on-orbit collision between an ADR target, whilst being de-orbited, and all the objects in the public catalogue published by the US Strategic Command. Such a collision could have significant effects because the target is likely to be located in a densely populated orbital regime and thus follow-on collisions could take place. Six impulsive and three low-thrust example ADR mission trajectories were screened for conjunctions. Extremely close conjunctions were found to result in as much as 99% of the total accumulated collision probability. The need to avoid those conjunctions is highlighted, which raises concerns about ADR methods that do not support collision avoidance. Shortening the removal missions, at an expense of more ΔV and so cost, will also lower their collision probability by reducing the number of conjunctions that they will experience.
•Longer ADR missions accumulate higher collision probabilities (PC) than shorter ones.•Up to 99% of this PC is caused by individual conjunctions with high individual PCs.•Such high PCs have to be mitigated to avoid collisions in congested orbital regimes.•Therefore, ADR must be able to conduct collision avoidance.•Accumulated PC of ADR should be traded off against the mission cost.</abstract><cop>Elmsford</cop><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><doi>10.1016/j.actaastro.2016.11.012</doi><tpages>8</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0094-5765 |
ispartof | Acta astronautica, 2017-02, Vol.131, p.10-17 |
issn | 0094-5765 1879-2030 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1879996967 |
source | Access via ScienceDirect (Elsevier) |
subjects | Active Debris Removal Aerospace environments Catalogues Collision avoidance Collision dynamics Collision probability Collisions Congestion Conjunction detection Cost engineering Debris Detritus Extreme values Missions Orbits Population density Probability Risk Space debris Space environment Space flight Spacecraft Sustainability |
title | Considering the collision probability of Active Debris Removal missions |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-22T06%3A19%3A17IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Considering%20the%20collision%20probability%20of%20Active%20Debris%20Removal%20missions&rft.jtitle=Acta%20astronautica&rft.au=Lidtke,%20Aleksander%20A.&rft.date=2017-02&rft.volume=131&rft.spage=10&rft.epage=17&rft.pages=10-17&rft.issn=0094-5765&rft.eissn=1879-2030&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.actaastro.2016.11.012&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1879996967%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1932038940&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_els_id=S0094576516305434&rfr_iscdi=true |