Considering the collision probability of Active Debris Removal missions

Active Debris Removal (ADR) methods are being developed due to a growing concern about the congestion on-orbit and sustainability of spaceflight. This study examined the probability of an on-orbit collision between an ADR target, whilst being de-orbited, and all the objects in the public catalogue p...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Acta astronautica 2017-02, Vol.131, p.10-17
Hauptverfasser: Lidtke, Aleksander A., Lewis, Hugh G., Armellin, Roberto, Urrutxua, Hodei
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 17
container_issue
container_start_page 10
container_title Acta astronautica
container_volume 131
creator Lidtke, Aleksander A.
Lewis, Hugh G.
Armellin, Roberto
Urrutxua, Hodei
description Active Debris Removal (ADR) methods are being developed due to a growing concern about the congestion on-orbit and sustainability of spaceflight. This study examined the probability of an on-orbit collision between an ADR target, whilst being de-orbited, and all the objects in the public catalogue published by the US Strategic Command. Such a collision could have significant effects because the target is likely to be located in a densely populated orbital regime and thus follow-on collisions could take place. Six impulsive and three low-thrust example ADR mission trajectories were screened for conjunctions. Extremely close conjunctions were found to result in as much as 99% of the total accumulated collision probability. The need to avoid those conjunctions is highlighted, which raises concerns about ADR methods that do not support collision avoidance. Shortening the removal missions, at an expense of more ΔV and so cost, will also lower their collision probability by reducing the number of conjunctions that they will experience. •Longer ADR missions accumulate higher collision probabilities (PC) than shorter ones.•Up to 99% of this PC is caused by individual conjunctions with high individual PCs.•Such high PCs have to be mitigated to avoid collisions in congested orbital regimes.•Therefore, ADR must be able to conduct collision avoidance.•Accumulated PC of ADR should be traded off against the mission cost.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.actaastro.2016.11.012
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1879996967</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0094576516305434</els_id><sourcerecordid>1879996967</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c458t-529a835da567a4c10139b54534292cf15698076ba6b74b530f2fa916bde797be3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkU1LxDAQhoMouK7-BgtevLQmbT6a47LqKgiC6Dkk6VRTus2adBf235uy4sGLngaGZ4b3A6FLgguCCb_pCm1HreMYfFGmRUFIgUl5hGakFjIvcYWP0QxjSXMmODtFZzF2GGNR1nKGVks_RNdAcMN7Nn5AZn3fu-j8kG2CN9q43o37zLfZwo5uB9ktmOBi9gJrv9N9tnZxguM5Oml1H-Hie87R2_3d6_Ihf3pePS4XT7mlrB5zVkpdV6zRjAtNbTJQScMoq2gpS9sSxmWNBTeaG0ENq3BbtloSbhoQUhio5uj68Dep-9xCHFVSYKHv9QB-G9XkWUouufgHyiQVlEmS0KtfaOe3YUhGFJFVirCWFCdKHCgbfIwBWrUJbq3DXhGspi5Up366UFMXihCVukiXi8MlpGh2DoKK1sFgoXEB7Kga7_788QV-1JVN</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1932038940</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Considering the collision probability of Active Debris Removal missions</title><source>Access via ScienceDirect (Elsevier)</source><creator>Lidtke, Aleksander A. ; Lewis, Hugh G. ; Armellin, Roberto ; Urrutxua, Hodei</creator><creatorcontrib>Lidtke, Aleksander A. ; Lewis, Hugh G. ; Armellin, Roberto ; Urrutxua, Hodei</creatorcontrib><description>Active Debris Removal (ADR) methods are being developed due to a growing concern about the congestion on-orbit and sustainability of spaceflight. This study examined the probability of an on-orbit collision between an ADR target, whilst being de-orbited, and all the objects in the public catalogue published by the US Strategic Command. Such a collision could have significant effects because the target is likely to be located in a densely populated orbital regime and thus follow-on collisions could take place. Six impulsive and three low-thrust example ADR mission trajectories were screened for conjunctions. Extremely close conjunctions were found to result in as much as 99% of the total accumulated collision probability. The need to avoid those conjunctions is highlighted, which raises concerns about ADR methods that do not support collision avoidance. Shortening the removal missions, at an expense of more ΔV and so cost, will also lower their collision probability by reducing the number of conjunctions that they will experience. •Longer ADR missions accumulate higher collision probabilities (PC) than shorter ones.•Up to 99% of this PC is caused by individual conjunctions with high individual PCs.•Such high PCs have to be mitigated to avoid collisions in congested orbital regimes.•Therefore, ADR must be able to conduct collision avoidance.•Accumulated PC of ADR should be traded off against the mission cost.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0094-5765</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1879-2030</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.actaastro.2016.11.012</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Elmsford: Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>Active Debris Removal ; Aerospace environments ; Catalogues ; Collision avoidance ; Collision dynamics ; Collision probability ; Collisions ; Congestion ; Conjunction detection ; Cost engineering ; Debris ; Detritus ; Extreme values ; Missions ; Orbits ; Population density ; Probability ; Risk ; Space debris ; Space environment ; Space flight ; Spacecraft ; Sustainability</subject><ispartof>Acta astronautica, 2017-02, Vol.131, p.10-17</ispartof><rights>2016</rights><rights>Copyright Elsevier BV Feb 2017</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c458t-529a835da567a4c10139b54534292cf15698076ba6b74b530f2fa916bde797be3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c458t-529a835da567a4c10139b54534292cf15698076ba6b74b530f2fa916bde797be3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.actaastro.2016.11.012$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,3550,27924,27925,45995</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Lidtke, Aleksander A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lewis, Hugh G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Armellin, Roberto</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Urrutxua, Hodei</creatorcontrib><title>Considering the collision probability of Active Debris Removal missions</title><title>Acta astronautica</title><description>Active Debris Removal (ADR) methods are being developed due to a growing concern about the congestion on-orbit and sustainability of spaceflight. This study examined the probability of an on-orbit collision between an ADR target, whilst being de-orbited, and all the objects in the public catalogue published by the US Strategic Command. Such a collision could have significant effects because the target is likely to be located in a densely populated orbital regime and thus follow-on collisions could take place. Six impulsive and three low-thrust example ADR mission trajectories were screened for conjunctions. Extremely close conjunctions were found to result in as much as 99% of the total accumulated collision probability. The need to avoid those conjunctions is highlighted, which raises concerns about ADR methods that do not support collision avoidance. Shortening the removal missions, at an expense of more ΔV and so cost, will also lower their collision probability by reducing the number of conjunctions that they will experience. •Longer ADR missions accumulate higher collision probabilities (PC) than shorter ones.•Up to 99% of this PC is caused by individual conjunctions with high individual PCs.•Such high PCs have to be mitigated to avoid collisions in congested orbital regimes.•Therefore, ADR must be able to conduct collision avoidance.•Accumulated PC of ADR should be traded off against the mission cost.</description><subject>Active Debris Removal</subject><subject>Aerospace environments</subject><subject>Catalogues</subject><subject>Collision avoidance</subject><subject>Collision dynamics</subject><subject>Collision probability</subject><subject>Collisions</subject><subject>Congestion</subject><subject>Conjunction detection</subject><subject>Cost engineering</subject><subject>Debris</subject><subject>Detritus</subject><subject>Extreme values</subject><subject>Missions</subject><subject>Orbits</subject><subject>Population density</subject><subject>Probability</subject><subject>Risk</subject><subject>Space debris</subject><subject>Space environment</subject><subject>Space flight</subject><subject>Spacecraft</subject><subject>Sustainability</subject><issn>0094-5765</issn><issn>1879-2030</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2017</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqNkU1LxDAQhoMouK7-BgtevLQmbT6a47LqKgiC6Dkk6VRTus2adBf235uy4sGLngaGZ4b3A6FLgguCCb_pCm1HreMYfFGmRUFIgUl5hGakFjIvcYWP0QxjSXMmODtFZzF2GGNR1nKGVks_RNdAcMN7Nn5AZn3fu-j8kG2CN9q43o37zLfZwo5uB9ktmOBi9gJrv9N9tnZxguM5Oml1H-Hie87R2_3d6_Ihf3pePS4XT7mlrB5zVkpdV6zRjAtNbTJQScMoq2gpS9sSxmWNBTeaG0ENq3BbtloSbhoQUhio5uj68Dep-9xCHFVSYKHv9QB-G9XkWUouufgHyiQVlEmS0KtfaOe3YUhGFJFVirCWFCdKHCgbfIwBWrUJbq3DXhGspi5Up366UFMXihCVukiXi8MlpGh2DoKK1sFgoXEB7Kga7_788QV-1JVN</recordid><startdate>201702</startdate><enddate>201702</enddate><creator>Lidtke, Aleksander A.</creator><creator>Lewis, Hugh G.</creator><creator>Armellin, Roberto</creator><creator>Urrutxua, Hodei</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><general>Elsevier BV</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7TB</scope><scope>7TG</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>H8D</scope><scope>KL.</scope><scope>L7M</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201702</creationdate><title>Considering the collision probability of Active Debris Removal missions</title><author>Lidtke, Aleksander A. ; Lewis, Hugh G. ; Armellin, Roberto ; Urrutxua, Hodei</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c458t-529a835da567a4c10139b54534292cf15698076ba6b74b530f2fa916bde797be3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2017</creationdate><topic>Active Debris Removal</topic><topic>Aerospace environments</topic><topic>Catalogues</topic><topic>Collision avoidance</topic><topic>Collision dynamics</topic><topic>Collision probability</topic><topic>Collisions</topic><topic>Congestion</topic><topic>Conjunction detection</topic><topic>Cost engineering</topic><topic>Debris</topic><topic>Detritus</topic><topic>Extreme values</topic><topic>Missions</topic><topic>Orbits</topic><topic>Population density</topic><topic>Probability</topic><topic>Risk</topic><topic>Space debris</topic><topic>Space environment</topic><topic>Space flight</topic><topic>Spacecraft</topic><topic>Sustainability</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Lidtke, Aleksander A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lewis, Hugh G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Armellin, Roberto</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Urrutxua, Hodei</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Mechanical &amp; Transportation Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Meteorological &amp; Geoastrophysical Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Aerospace Database</collection><collection>Meteorological &amp; Geoastrophysical Abstracts - Academic</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace</collection><jtitle>Acta astronautica</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Lidtke, Aleksander A.</au><au>Lewis, Hugh G.</au><au>Armellin, Roberto</au><au>Urrutxua, Hodei</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Considering the collision probability of Active Debris Removal missions</atitle><jtitle>Acta astronautica</jtitle><date>2017-02</date><risdate>2017</risdate><volume>131</volume><spage>10</spage><epage>17</epage><pages>10-17</pages><issn>0094-5765</issn><eissn>1879-2030</eissn><abstract>Active Debris Removal (ADR) methods are being developed due to a growing concern about the congestion on-orbit and sustainability of spaceflight. This study examined the probability of an on-orbit collision between an ADR target, whilst being de-orbited, and all the objects in the public catalogue published by the US Strategic Command. Such a collision could have significant effects because the target is likely to be located in a densely populated orbital regime and thus follow-on collisions could take place. Six impulsive and three low-thrust example ADR mission trajectories were screened for conjunctions. Extremely close conjunctions were found to result in as much as 99% of the total accumulated collision probability. The need to avoid those conjunctions is highlighted, which raises concerns about ADR methods that do not support collision avoidance. Shortening the removal missions, at an expense of more ΔV and so cost, will also lower their collision probability by reducing the number of conjunctions that they will experience. •Longer ADR missions accumulate higher collision probabilities (PC) than shorter ones.•Up to 99% of this PC is caused by individual conjunctions with high individual PCs.•Such high PCs have to be mitigated to avoid collisions in congested orbital regimes.•Therefore, ADR must be able to conduct collision avoidance.•Accumulated PC of ADR should be traded off against the mission cost.</abstract><cop>Elmsford</cop><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><doi>10.1016/j.actaastro.2016.11.012</doi><tpages>8</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0094-5765
ispartof Acta astronautica, 2017-02, Vol.131, p.10-17
issn 0094-5765
1879-2030
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1879996967
source Access via ScienceDirect (Elsevier)
subjects Active Debris Removal
Aerospace environments
Catalogues
Collision avoidance
Collision dynamics
Collision probability
Collisions
Congestion
Conjunction detection
Cost engineering
Debris
Detritus
Extreme values
Missions
Orbits
Population density
Probability
Risk
Space debris
Space environment
Space flight
Spacecraft
Sustainability
title Considering the collision probability of Active Debris Removal missions
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-22T06%3A19%3A17IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Considering%20the%20collision%20probability%20of%20Active%20Debris%20Removal%20missions&rft.jtitle=Acta%20astronautica&rft.au=Lidtke,%20Aleksander%20A.&rft.date=2017-02&rft.volume=131&rft.spage=10&rft.epage=17&rft.pages=10-17&rft.issn=0094-5765&rft.eissn=1879-2030&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.actaastro.2016.11.012&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1879996967%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1932038940&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_els_id=S0094576516305434&rfr_iscdi=true