Hollow Fibers Filtration and Cleaning Processes Under Ultrasound and Gas Bubbling Combination
Fouling is one of the main obstacles to filtration process. In this study, the effects of gas bubbling by carbonated feed, gas bubbling by direct injection of CO2 (GB‐DI‐CO2) and N2 (GB‐DI‐N2) and ultrasound (US) were evaluated on flux enhancement during milk solution ultrafiltration and flux recove...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of food process engineering 2017-02, Vol.40 (1), p.np-n/a |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , |
Format: | Magazinearticle |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | n/a |
---|---|
container_issue | 1 |
container_start_page | np |
container_title | Journal of food process engineering |
container_volume | 40 |
creator | Hashemi Shahraki, Masoud Maskooki, Abdolmajid Faezian, Ali |
description | Fouling is one of the main obstacles to filtration process. In this study, the effects of gas bubbling by carbonated feed, gas bubbling by direct injection of CO2 (GB‐DI‐CO2) and N2 (GB‐DI‐N2) and ultrasound (US) were evaluated on flux enhancement during milk solution ultrafiltration and flux recovery during cleaning process of fouled hollow fibers membrane module. Results showed that the US and gas bubbling (GB) treatments significantly enhanced the performance of both ultrafiltration and cleaning processes, however, the effect of GB‐DI‐CO2 was not considerable. The best results were achieved when the GB‐DI‐N2 treatment was applied with US treatment in filtration and cleaning process, under this treatment, the permeation flux was remarkably enhanced up to 288.57% during ultrafiltration as well as the fouling percentage was reduced to 15.55% after cleaning the fouled membrane. Furthermore, the US was more effective than the GB during cleaning process.
Practical Applications
Filtration process is faced to flux decline as a result of fouling. The ultrasound at low frequency and liquid–gas two phase flow can affect the concentration polarization and cake layer significantly. The combination of these techniques can be used as an effective methods to handle the fouling and flux decline. Also artificial neural networks model is able to predict the flux permeation of hollow‐fibers filtration under ultrasound and gas bubbling combination as a complex condition practically. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1111/jfpe.12325 |
format | Magazinearticle |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1879988334</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1868323238</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4425-876c703d2d066d2969db36b0c962d48de1dea34590fbb1954cdb82bd23ef51db3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqN0E1LAzEQBuAgCtbqxV-wRxFa873Zoy79UAr2YI8Skk1WtqSbmnQp_fdmu57FucwcnhmGF4B7BKco1dO23tspwgSzCzBCOWUTygi8BCOI0ixEzq_BTYxbCAljEI_A59I754_ZvNE2xNTcIahD49tMtSYrnVVt035l6-ArG6ON2aY1NmSbnkXfJdO7hYrZS6e1623pd7ppz0duwVWtXLR3v30MNvPZR7mcrN4Xr-XzalJRitNfOa9ySAw2kHODC14YTbiGVcGxocJYZKwilBWw1hoVjFZGC6wNJrZmKNkxeBju7oP_7mw8yF0TK-ucaq3vokQiLwohCKH_oFyQFCARiT4OtAo-xmBruQ_NToWTRFD2ccs-bnmOO2E04GPj7OkPKd_m69mw8wM8coJt</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>magazinearticle</recordtype><pqid>1868323238</pqid></control><display><type>magazinearticle</type><title>Hollow Fibers Filtration and Cleaning Processes Under Ultrasound and Gas Bubbling Combination</title><source>EBSCOhost Business Source Complete</source><source>Access via Wiley Online Library</source><creator>Hashemi Shahraki, Masoud ; Maskooki, Abdolmajid ; Faezian, Ali</creator><creatorcontrib>Hashemi Shahraki, Masoud ; Maskooki, Abdolmajid ; Faezian, Ali</creatorcontrib><description>Fouling is one of the main obstacles to filtration process. In this study, the effects of gas bubbling by carbonated feed, gas bubbling by direct injection of CO2 (GB‐DI‐CO2) and N2 (GB‐DI‐N2) and ultrasound (US) were evaluated on flux enhancement during milk solution ultrafiltration and flux recovery during cleaning process of fouled hollow fibers membrane module. Results showed that the US and gas bubbling (GB) treatments significantly enhanced the performance of both ultrafiltration and cleaning processes, however, the effect of GB‐DI‐CO2 was not considerable. The best results were achieved when the GB‐DI‐N2 treatment was applied with US treatment in filtration and cleaning process, under this treatment, the permeation flux was remarkably enhanced up to 288.57% during ultrafiltration as well as the fouling percentage was reduced to 15.55% after cleaning the fouled membrane. Furthermore, the US was more effective than the GB during cleaning process.
Practical Applications
Filtration process is faced to flux decline as a result of fouling. The ultrasound at low frequency and liquid–gas two phase flow can affect the concentration polarization and cake layer significantly. The combination of these techniques can be used as an effective methods to handle the fouling and flux decline. Also artificial neural networks model is able to predict the flux permeation of hollow‐fibers filtration under ultrasound and gas bubbling combination as a complex condition practically.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0145-8876</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1745-4530</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/jfpe.12325</identifier><language>eng</language><subject>Bubbling ; Cleaning ; Filtration ; Flux ; Fouling ; Mathematical models ; Ultrafiltration ; Ultrasound</subject><ispartof>Journal of food process engineering, 2017-02, Vol.40 (1), p.np-n/a</ispartof><rights>2015 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4425-876c703d2d066d2969db36b0c962d48de1dea34590fbb1954cdb82bd23ef51db3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4425-876c703d2d066d2969db36b0c962d48de1dea34590fbb1954cdb82bd23ef51db3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111%2Fjfpe.12325$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111%2Fjfpe.12325$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>780,784,1417,27925,45574,45575</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Hashemi Shahraki, Masoud</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Maskooki, Abdolmajid</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Faezian, Ali</creatorcontrib><title>Hollow Fibers Filtration and Cleaning Processes Under Ultrasound and Gas Bubbling Combination</title><title>Journal of food process engineering</title><description>Fouling is one of the main obstacles to filtration process. In this study, the effects of gas bubbling by carbonated feed, gas bubbling by direct injection of CO2 (GB‐DI‐CO2) and N2 (GB‐DI‐N2) and ultrasound (US) were evaluated on flux enhancement during milk solution ultrafiltration and flux recovery during cleaning process of fouled hollow fibers membrane module. Results showed that the US and gas bubbling (GB) treatments significantly enhanced the performance of both ultrafiltration and cleaning processes, however, the effect of GB‐DI‐CO2 was not considerable. The best results were achieved when the GB‐DI‐N2 treatment was applied with US treatment in filtration and cleaning process, under this treatment, the permeation flux was remarkably enhanced up to 288.57% during ultrafiltration as well as the fouling percentage was reduced to 15.55% after cleaning the fouled membrane. Furthermore, the US was more effective than the GB during cleaning process.
Practical Applications
Filtration process is faced to flux decline as a result of fouling. The ultrasound at low frequency and liquid–gas two phase flow can affect the concentration polarization and cake layer significantly. The combination of these techniques can be used as an effective methods to handle the fouling and flux decline. Also artificial neural networks model is able to predict the flux permeation of hollow‐fibers filtration under ultrasound and gas bubbling combination as a complex condition practically.</description><subject>Bubbling</subject><subject>Cleaning</subject><subject>Filtration</subject><subject>Flux</subject><subject>Fouling</subject><subject>Mathematical models</subject><subject>Ultrafiltration</subject><subject>Ultrasound</subject><issn>0145-8876</issn><issn>1745-4530</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>magazinearticle</rsrctype><creationdate>2017</creationdate><recordtype>magazinearticle</recordtype><recordid>eNqN0E1LAzEQBuAgCtbqxV-wRxFa873Zoy79UAr2YI8Skk1WtqSbmnQp_fdmu57FucwcnhmGF4B7BKco1dO23tspwgSzCzBCOWUTygi8BCOI0ixEzq_BTYxbCAljEI_A59I754_ZvNE2xNTcIahD49tMtSYrnVVt035l6-ArG6ON2aY1NmSbnkXfJdO7hYrZS6e1623pd7ppz0duwVWtXLR3v30MNvPZR7mcrN4Xr-XzalJRitNfOa9ySAw2kHODC14YTbiGVcGxocJYZKwilBWw1hoVjFZGC6wNJrZmKNkxeBju7oP_7mw8yF0TK-ucaq3vokQiLwohCKH_oFyQFCARiT4OtAo-xmBruQ_NToWTRFD2ccs-bnmOO2E04GPj7OkPKd_m69mw8wM8coJt</recordid><startdate>201702</startdate><enddate>201702</enddate><creator>Hashemi Shahraki, Masoud</creator><creator>Maskooki, Abdolmajid</creator><creator>Faezian, Ali</creator><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QO</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>SOI</scope><scope>F28</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201702</creationdate><title>Hollow Fibers Filtration and Cleaning Processes Under Ultrasound and Gas Bubbling Combination</title><author>Hashemi Shahraki, Masoud ; Maskooki, Abdolmajid ; Faezian, Ali</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4425-876c703d2d066d2969db36b0c962d48de1dea34590fbb1954cdb82bd23ef51db3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>magazinearticle</rsrctype><prefilter>magazinearticle</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2017</creationdate><topic>Bubbling</topic><topic>Cleaning</topic><topic>Filtration</topic><topic>Flux</topic><topic>Fouling</topic><topic>Mathematical models</topic><topic>Ultrafiltration</topic><topic>Ultrasound</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Hashemi Shahraki, Masoud</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Maskooki, Abdolmajid</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Faezian, Ali</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Biotechnology Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>ANTE: Abstracts in New Technology & Engineering</collection><jtitle>Journal of food process engineering</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Hashemi Shahraki, Masoud</au><au>Maskooki, Abdolmajid</au><au>Faezian, Ali</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Hollow Fibers Filtration and Cleaning Processes Under Ultrasound and Gas Bubbling Combination</atitle><jtitle>Journal of food process engineering</jtitle><date>2017-02</date><risdate>2017</risdate><volume>40</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>np</spage><epage>n/a</epage><pages>np-n/a</pages><issn>0145-8876</issn><eissn>1745-4530</eissn><abstract>Fouling is one of the main obstacles to filtration process. In this study, the effects of gas bubbling by carbonated feed, gas bubbling by direct injection of CO2 (GB‐DI‐CO2) and N2 (GB‐DI‐N2) and ultrasound (US) were evaluated on flux enhancement during milk solution ultrafiltration and flux recovery during cleaning process of fouled hollow fibers membrane module. Results showed that the US and gas bubbling (GB) treatments significantly enhanced the performance of both ultrafiltration and cleaning processes, however, the effect of GB‐DI‐CO2 was not considerable. The best results were achieved when the GB‐DI‐N2 treatment was applied with US treatment in filtration and cleaning process, under this treatment, the permeation flux was remarkably enhanced up to 288.57% during ultrafiltration as well as the fouling percentage was reduced to 15.55% after cleaning the fouled membrane. Furthermore, the US was more effective than the GB during cleaning process.
Practical Applications
Filtration process is faced to flux decline as a result of fouling. The ultrasound at low frequency and liquid–gas two phase flow can affect the concentration polarization and cake layer significantly. The combination of these techniques can be used as an effective methods to handle the fouling and flux decline. Also artificial neural networks model is able to predict the flux permeation of hollow‐fibers filtration under ultrasound and gas bubbling combination as a complex condition practically.</abstract><doi>10.1111/jfpe.12325</doi><tpages>9</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0145-8876 |
ispartof | Journal of food process engineering, 2017-02, Vol.40 (1), p.np-n/a |
issn | 0145-8876 1745-4530 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1879988334 |
source | EBSCOhost Business Source Complete; Access via Wiley Online Library |
subjects | Bubbling Cleaning Filtration Flux Fouling Mathematical models Ultrafiltration Ultrasound |
title | Hollow Fibers Filtration and Cleaning Processes Under Ultrasound and Gas Bubbling Combination |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-25T20%3A55%3A18IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Hollow%20Fibers%20Filtration%20and%20Cleaning%20Processes%20Under%20Ultrasound%20and%20Gas%20Bubbling%20Combination&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20food%20process%20engineering&rft.au=Hashemi%20Shahraki,%20Masoud&rft.date=2017-02&rft.volume=40&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=np&rft.epage=n/a&rft.pages=np-n/a&rft.issn=0145-8876&rft.eissn=1745-4530&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/jfpe.12325&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1868323238%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1868323238&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |