An investigation of the daylighting simulation techniques and sky modeling practices for occupant centric evaluations

Occupant centric performance approaches in daylighting studies promote design decisions that support human visual comfort, productivity, and visual preferences, along with more conventional energy efficiency criteria. Simulating per-pixel luminance values and luminance distribution patterns for the...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Building and environment 2017-02, Vol.113, p.220-231
Hauptverfasser: Inanici, Mehlika, Hashemloo, Alireza
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 231
container_issue
container_start_page 220
container_title Building and environment
container_volume 113
creator Inanici, Mehlika
Hashemloo, Alireza
description Occupant centric performance approaches in daylighting studies promote design decisions that support human visual comfort, productivity, and visual preferences, along with more conventional energy efficiency criteria. Simulating per-pixel luminance values and luminance distribution patterns for the entire scene allows us to analyze the occupant centric metrics and performance criteria. However, there are a number of different sky models, complex fenestration models, and simulation techniques that produce either conventional point in time images or annual luminance maps. This paper discusses the similarities and differences between different techniques; and a comparison analyses provides insight about their impact on occupant centric lighting measures. The comparisons for sky modeling include the conventional CIE skies (Clear, Intermediate, and Overcast), measurement based CIE models, Perez all-weather skies, and high dynamic range image based skies. The comparison of simulation techniques include point in time simulations, image based lighting simulations, and annual luminance simulations (three-phase and five-phase methods). Results demonstrate that measurement based sky models match real world conditions with reasonable proximity, and generic CIE skies consistently underestimate the indoor lighting conditions. Annual simulation methods provide a large database of temporal luminance variations, where individual instances are comparable to point in time simulations. Long term luminance simulations provide opportunities to evaluate the percentage of the year that a given luminance based criteria is met or violated. •Different sky modeling techniques are compared for their ability to model daylight availability.•Different simulation techniques for point in time and annual simulations are compared for accuracy and consistency.•Findings allow users to select the appropriate sky models and simulations techniques for a given task.•A new annual luminance metric is developed to study the temporal variations in a given space.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.buildenv.2016.09.022
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1879987363</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0360132316303626</els_id><sourcerecordid>1859496357</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c378t-c7a3851a6f06432ec459d8be270da279f189a7e131de12b5e89070cd53cc85643</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkU9rGzEQxUVJoY7br1B0zGW30mr_6VZjmqRgyCWF3oQ8mrXlriVX0i7421euk3NyGob5vcfMPEK-clZyxttvh3I72dGgm8sq9yWTJauqD2TB-04UbV__viELJlpWcFGJT-Q2xgPLoBT1gkwrR62bMSa708l6R_1A0x6p0efR7vbJuh2N9jiN12lC2Dv7d8JItTM0_jnTozc4XrBT0JAs5NHgA_UA00m7RAFdChYoznqc_rvEz-TjoMeIX17qkvy6__G8fiw2Tw8_16tNAaLrUwGdFn3DdTuwthYVQt1I02-x6pjRVScH3kvdIRfcIK-2DfaSdQxMIwD6JkuW5O7qewr-snNSRxsBx1E79FNU-UNS5i-14h1oI2vZiqbLaHtFIfgYAw7qFOxRh7PiTF0iUQf1Gom6RKKYVDmSLPx-FWK-ebYYVASLDtDYgJCU8fYti3_EGJsL</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1859496357</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>An investigation of the daylighting simulation techniques and sky modeling practices for occupant centric evaluations</title><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals</source><creator>Inanici, Mehlika ; Hashemloo, Alireza</creator><creatorcontrib>Inanici, Mehlika ; Hashemloo, Alireza</creatorcontrib><description>Occupant centric performance approaches in daylighting studies promote design decisions that support human visual comfort, productivity, and visual preferences, along with more conventional energy efficiency criteria. Simulating per-pixel luminance values and luminance distribution patterns for the entire scene allows us to analyze the occupant centric metrics and performance criteria. However, there are a number of different sky models, complex fenestration models, and simulation techniques that produce either conventional point in time images or annual luminance maps. This paper discusses the similarities and differences between different techniques; and a comparison analyses provides insight about their impact on occupant centric lighting measures. The comparisons for sky modeling include the conventional CIE skies (Clear, Intermediate, and Overcast), measurement based CIE models, Perez all-weather skies, and high dynamic range image based skies. The comparison of simulation techniques include point in time simulations, image based lighting simulations, and annual luminance simulations (three-phase and five-phase methods). Results demonstrate that measurement based sky models match real world conditions with reasonable proximity, and generic CIE skies consistently underestimate the indoor lighting conditions. Annual simulation methods provide a large database of temporal luminance variations, where individual instances are comparable to point in time simulations. Long term luminance simulations provide opportunities to evaluate the percentage of the year that a given luminance based criteria is met or violated. •Different sky modeling techniques are compared for their ability to model daylight availability.•Different simulation techniques for point in time and annual simulations are compared for accuracy and consistency.•Findings allow users to select the appropriate sky models and simulations techniques for a given task.•A new annual luminance metric is developed to study the temporal variations in a given space.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0360-1323</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1873-684X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.buildenv.2016.09.022</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>Annual lighting simulations ; Annual luminance maps ; Computer simulation ; Criteria ; Daylight simulations ; Illumination ; Image based lighting ; Lighting ; Luminance ; Modelling ; Point in time simulations ; Sky models</subject><ispartof>Building and environment, 2017-02, Vol.113, p.220-231</ispartof><rights>2016 Elsevier Ltd</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c378t-c7a3851a6f06432ec459d8be270da279f189a7e131de12b5e89070cd53cc85643</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c378t-c7a3851a6f06432ec459d8be270da279f189a7e131de12b5e89070cd53cc85643</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0360132316303626$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,3537,27901,27902,65306</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Inanici, Mehlika</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hashemloo, Alireza</creatorcontrib><title>An investigation of the daylighting simulation techniques and sky modeling practices for occupant centric evaluations</title><title>Building and environment</title><description>Occupant centric performance approaches in daylighting studies promote design decisions that support human visual comfort, productivity, and visual preferences, along with more conventional energy efficiency criteria. Simulating per-pixel luminance values and luminance distribution patterns for the entire scene allows us to analyze the occupant centric metrics and performance criteria. However, there are a number of different sky models, complex fenestration models, and simulation techniques that produce either conventional point in time images or annual luminance maps. This paper discusses the similarities and differences between different techniques; and a comparison analyses provides insight about their impact on occupant centric lighting measures. The comparisons for sky modeling include the conventional CIE skies (Clear, Intermediate, and Overcast), measurement based CIE models, Perez all-weather skies, and high dynamic range image based skies. The comparison of simulation techniques include point in time simulations, image based lighting simulations, and annual luminance simulations (three-phase and five-phase methods). Results demonstrate that measurement based sky models match real world conditions with reasonable proximity, and generic CIE skies consistently underestimate the indoor lighting conditions. Annual simulation methods provide a large database of temporal luminance variations, where individual instances are comparable to point in time simulations. Long term luminance simulations provide opportunities to evaluate the percentage of the year that a given luminance based criteria is met or violated. •Different sky modeling techniques are compared for their ability to model daylight availability.•Different simulation techniques for point in time and annual simulations are compared for accuracy and consistency.•Findings allow users to select the appropriate sky models and simulations techniques for a given task.•A new annual luminance metric is developed to study the temporal variations in a given space.</description><subject>Annual lighting simulations</subject><subject>Annual luminance maps</subject><subject>Computer simulation</subject><subject>Criteria</subject><subject>Daylight simulations</subject><subject>Illumination</subject><subject>Image based lighting</subject><subject>Lighting</subject><subject>Luminance</subject><subject>Modelling</subject><subject>Point in time simulations</subject><subject>Sky models</subject><issn>0360-1323</issn><issn>1873-684X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2017</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqNkU9rGzEQxUVJoY7br1B0zGW30mr_6VZjmqRgyCWF3oQ8mrXlriVX0i7421euk3NyGob5vcfMPEK-clZyxttvh3I72dGgm8sq9yWTJauqD2TB-04UbV__viELJlpWcFGJT-Q2xgPLoBT1gkwrR62bMSa708l6R_1A0x6p0efR7vbJuh2N9jiN12lC2Dv7d8JItTM0_jnTozc4XrBT0JAs5NHgA_UA00m7RAFdChYoznqc_rvEz-TjoMeIX17qkvy6__G8fiw2Tw8_16tNAaLrUwGdFn3DdTuwthYVQt1I02-x6pjRVScH3kvdIRfcIK-2DfaSdQxMIwD6JkuW5O7qewr-snNSRxsBx1E79FNU-UNS5i-14h1oI2vZiqbLaHtFIfgYAw7qFOxRh7PiTF0iUQf1Gom6RKKYVDmSLPx-FWK-ebYYVASLDtDYgJCU8fYti3_EGJsL</recordid><startdate>20170215</startdate><enddate>20170215</enddate><creator>Inanici, Mehlika</creator><creator>Hashemloo, Alireza</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>SOI</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>F28</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>KR7</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20170215</creationdate><title>An investigation of the daylighting simulation techniques and sky modeling practices for occupant centric evaluations</title><author>Inanici, Mehlika ; Hashemloo, Alireza</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c378t-c7a3851a6f06432ec459d8be270da279f189a7e131de12b5e89070cd53cc85643</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2017</creationdate><topic>Annual lighting simulations</topic><topic>Annual luminance maps</topic><topic>Computer simulation</topic><topic>Criteria</topic><topic>Daylight simulations</topic><topic>Illumination</topic><topic>Image based lighting</topic><topic>Lighting</topic><topic>Luminance</topic><topic>Modelling</topic><topic>Point in time simulations</topic><topic>Sky models</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Inanici, Mehlika</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hashemloo, Alireza</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ANTE: Abstracts in New Technology &amp; Engineering</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Civil Engineering Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Building and environment</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Inanici, Mehlika</au><au>Hashemloo, Alireza</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>An investigation of the daylighting simulation techniques and sky modeling practices for occupant centric evaluations</atitle><jtitle>Building and environment</jtitle><date>2017-02-15</date><risdate>2017</risdate><volume>113</volume><spage>220</spage><epage>231</epage><pages>220-231</pages><issn>0360-1323</issn><eissn>1873-684X</eissn><abstract>Occupant centric performance approaches in daylighting studies promote design decisions that support human visual comfort, productivity, and visual preferences, along with more conventional energy efficiency criteria. Simulating per-pixel luminance values and luminance distribution patterns for the entire scene allows us to analyze the occupant centric metrics and performance criteria. However, there are a number of different sky models, complex fenestration models, and simulation techniques that produce either conventional point in time images or annual luminance maps. This paper discusses the similarities and differences between different techniques; and a comparison analyses provides insight about their impact on occupant centric lighting measures. The comparisons for sky modeling include the conventional CIE skies (Clear, Intermediate, and Overcast), measurement based CIE models, Perez all-weather skies, and high dynamic range image based skies. The comparison of simulation techniques include point in time simulations, image based lighting simulations, and annual luminance simulations (three-phase and five-phase methods). Results demonstrate that measurement based sky models match real world conditions with reasonable proximity, and generic CIE skies consistently underestimate the indoor lighting conditions. Annual simulation methods provide a large database of temporal luminance variations, where individual instances are comparable to point in time simulations. Long term luminance simulations provide opportunities to evaluate the percentage of the year that a given luminance based criteria is met or violated. •Different sky modeling techniques are compared for their ability to model daylight availability.•Different simulation techniques for point in time and annual simulations are compared for accuracy and consistency.•Findings allow users to select the appropriate sky models and simulations techniques for a given task.•A new annual luminance metric is developed to study the temporal variations in a given space.</abstract><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><doi>10.1016/j.buildenv.2016.09.022</doi><tpages>12</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0360-1323
ispartof Building and environment, 2017-02, Vol.113, p.220-231
issn 0360-1323
1873-684X
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1879987363
source Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals
subjects Annual lighting simulations
Annual luminance maps
Computer simulation
Criteria
Daylight simulations
Illumination
Image based lighting
Lighting
Luminance
Modelling
Point in time simulations
Sky models
title An investigation of the daylighting simulation techniques and sky modeling practices for occupant centric evaluations
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-28T17%3A05%3A08IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=An%20investigation%20of%20the%20daylighting%20simulation%20techniques%20and%20sky%20modeling%20practices%20for%20occupant%20centric%20evaluations&rft.jtitle=Building%20and%20environment&rft.au=Inanici,%20Mehlika&rft.date=2017-02-15&rft.volume=113&rft.spage=220&rft.epage=231&rft.pages=220-231&rft.issn=0360-1323&rft.eissn=1873-684X&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.buildenv.2016.09.022&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1859496357%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1859496357&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_els_id=S0360132316303626&rfr_iscdi=true