Assessment of Elevation Uncertainty in Salt Marsh Environments using Discrete-Return and Full-Waveform Lidar

Rogers, J.N.; Parrish, C.E.; Ward, L.G., and Burdick, D.M., 2016. Assessment of elevation uncertainty in salt marsh environments using discrete-return and full-waveform lidar. In: Brock, J.C.; Gesch, D.B.; Parrish, C.E.; Rogers, J.N., and Wright, C.W. (eds.), Advances in Topobathymetric Mapping, Mod...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of coastal research 2016-12, Vol.76 (sp1), p.107-122
Hauptverfasser: Rogers, Jeffrey N, Parrish, Christopher E, Ward, Larry G, Burdick, David M
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 122
container_issue sp1
container_start_page 107
container_title Journal of coastal research
container_volume 76
creator Rogers, Jeffrey N
Parrish, Christopher E
Ward, Larry G
Burdick, David M
description Rogers, J.N.; Parrish, C.E.; Ward, L.G., and Burdick, D.M., 2016. Assessment of elevation uncertainty in salt marsh environments using discrete-return and full-waveform lidar. In: Brock, J.C.; Gesch, D.B.; Parrish, C.E.; Rogers, J.N., and Wright, C.W. (eds.), Advances in Topobathymetric Mapping, Models, and Applications. Journal of Coastal Research, Special Issue, No. 76, pp. 107–122. Coconut Creek (Florida), ISSN 0749-0208. Lidar data can serve as an important source of elevation information for studying, monitoring and managing salt marshes. However, previous studies have shown that lidar data tend to have greater vertical uncertainty in salt marshes than in other environments, hindering the ability to resolve small elevation differences that can be ecologically significant in marshes. For coastal scientists and managers to effectively collect, evaluate, and/or use lidar data in salt marshes, factors affecting elevation uncertainty (e.g., plant species, season, and lidar processing methods) must be well understood. This study addresses this need using discrete-return (DRL) and full-waveform lidar, along with field-surveyed reference data, for four marshes on Cape Cod, Massachusetts (USA). The lidar bias and standard deviation were computed across all four marsh systems and four major taxa using varying interpolation and filtering methods. The effects of seasonality were also investigated using lidar data acquired in the summer and the following spring. Relative uncertainty surfaces (RUS) were computed from lidar waveform-derived metrics and examined for their utility and correlation with individual lidar errors. The results clearly illustrate the importance of seasonality, species, and lidar interpolation and filtering methods on elevation uncertainty in salt marshes. Results also demonstrate that RUS generated from lidar waveform features are useful in qualitative assessments of lidar elevation uncertainty and correlate well with vegetation height (r = 0.85; n = 268). Knowledge of where DRL uncertainty persists within salt marshes and the factors influencing the higher uncertainty should facilitate the development of better correction methods.
doi_str_mv 10.2112/SI76-010
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>jstor_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1879984728</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>44072544</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>44072544</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-b408t-d9a8498d5cc1d7ca0708f874965ad7ce27151f470e87a042491247fbc8e1a49a3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkVtLAzEQhYMoWC_gHxACgviyOkmTTfZRtF6gInjBxyXdndWUbaJJtuC_N6XigyDIPAzDfHOYwyHkgMEpZ4yfPd6qsgAGG2TEpGSFhHG5SUagRFUAB71NdmKcA7BSCzUi_XmMGOMCXaK-o5MelyZZ7-izazAkY136pNbRR9MnemdCfKMTt7TBu9VJpEO07pVe2tgETFg8YBqCo8a19Gro--LFLLHzYUGntjVhj2x1po-4_913yfPV5OnippjeX99enE-LmQCdirYyWlS6lU3DWtUYUKA7nQ2U0uQZuWKSdUIBamVAcFExLlQ3azQyIyoz3iUna9334D8GjKle5Aex741DP8SaaVVV2T7X_0BLPealgiqjR7_Quc9ms5FMyVKXY5nrR7AJPsaAXf0e7MKEz5pBvUqoXiVU54QyerhG5zH58MMJAYpLIfL-eL2fWe8d_i30Bdxrl-k</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1856863535</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Assessment of Elevation Uncertainty in Salt Marsh Environments using Discrete-Return and Full-Waveform Lidar</title><source>Jstor Complete Legacy</source><creator>Rogers, Jeffrey N ; Parrish, Christopher E ; Ward, Larry G ; Burdick, David M</creator><creatorcontrib>Rogers, Jeffrey N ; Parrish, Christopher E ; Ward, Larry G ; Burdick, David M</creatorcontrib><description>Rogers, J.N.; Parrish, C.E.; Ward, L.G., and Burdick, D.M., 2016. Assessment of elevation uncertainty in salt marsh environments using discrete-return and full-waveform lidar. In: Brock, J.C.; Gesch, D.B.; Parrish, C.E.; Rogers, J.N., and Wright, C.W. (eds.), Advances in Topobathymetric Mapping, Models, and Applications. Journal of Coastal Research, Special Issue, No. 76, pp. 107–122. Coconut Creek (Florida), ISSN 0749-0208. Lidar data can serve as an important source of elevation information for studying, monitoring and managing salt marshes. However, previous studies have shown that lidar data tend to have greater vertical uncertainty in salt marshes than in other environments, hindering the ability to resolve small elevation differences that can be ecologically significant in marshes. For coastal scientists and managers to effectively collect, evaluate, and/or use lidar data in salt marshes, factors affecting elevation uncertainty (e.g., plant species, season, and lidar processing methods) must be well understood. This study addresses this need using discrete-return (DRL) and full-waveform lidar, along with field-surveyed reference data, for four marshes on Cape Cod, Massachusetts (USA). The lidar bias and standard deviation were computed across all four marsh systems and four major taxa using varying interpolation and filtering methods. The effects of seasonality were also investigated using lidar data acquired in the summer and the following spring. Relative uncertainty surfaces (RUS) were computed from lidar waveform-derived metrics and examined for their utility and correlation with individual lidar errors. The results clearly illustrate the importance of seasonality, species, and lidar interpolation and filtering methods on elevation uncertainty in salt marshes. Results also demonstrate that RUS generated from lidar waveform features are useful in qualitative assessments of lidar elevation uncertainty and correlate well with vegetation height (r = 0.85; n = 268). Knowledge of where DRL uncertainty persists within salt marshes and the factors influencing the higher uncertainty should facilitate the development of better correction methods.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0749-0208</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1551-5036</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.2112/SI76-010</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Fort Lauderdale: Coastal Education and Research Foundation</publisher><subject>Assessments ; bare earth filtering ; Bias ; Data collection ; Datasets ; DEM ; Elevation ; Error rates ; Filtering ; Filtration ; Funding ; Interpolation ; inverse distance weighting ; Lidar ; Marshes ; Plant species ; Remote sensing ; Salt marsh vegetation ; Salt marshes ; Sea level ; Seasonal variations ; Shoreline protection ; Signal processing ; Soil erosion ; Spartina alterniflora ; Standard deviation ; Studies ; Time series ; Topographical elevation ; Uncertainty ; Vegetation ; Waveforms</subject><ispartof>Journal of coastal research, 2016-12, Vol.76 (sp1), p.107-122</ispartof><rights>Coastal Education and Research Foundation, Inc. 2016</rights><rights>2016 Coastal Education and Research Foundation, Inc. [CERF]</rights><rights>Copyright Allen Press Publishing Services 2016</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-b408t-d9a8498d5cc1d7ca0708f874965ad7ce27151f470e87a042491247fbc8e1a49a3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-b408t-d9a8498d5cc1d7ca0708f874965ad7ce27151f470e87a042491247fbc8e1a49a3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/44072544$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/44072544$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,799,27901,27902,57992,58225</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Rogers, Jeffrey N</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Parrish, Christopher E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ward, Larry G</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Burdick, David M</creatorcontrib><title>Assessment of Elevation Uncertainty in Salt Marsh Environments using Discrete-Return and Full-Waveform Lidar</title><title>Journal of coastal research</title><description>Rogers, J.N.; Parrish, C.E.; Ward, L.G., and Burdick, D.M., 2016. Assessment of elevation uncertainty in salt marsh environments using discrete-return and full-waveform lidar. In: Brock, J.C.; Gesch, D.B.; Parrish, C.E.; Rogers, J.N., and Wright, C.W. (eds.), Advances in Topobathymetric Mapping, Models, and Applications. Journal of Coastal Research, Special Issue, No. 76, pp. 107–122. Coconut Creek (Florida), ISSN 0749-0208. Lidar data can serve as an important source of elevation information for studying, monitoring and managing salt marshes. However, previous studies have shown that lidar data tend to have greater vertical uncertainty in salt marshes than in other environments, hindering the ability to resolve small elevation differences that can be ecologically significant in marshes. For coastal scientists and managers to effectively collect, evaluate, and/or use lidar data in salt marshes, factors affecting elevation uncertainty (e.g., plant species, season, and lidar processing methods) must be well understood. This study addresses this need using discrete-return (DRL) and full-waveform lidar, along with field-surveyed reference data, for four marshes on Cape Cod, Massachusetts (USA). The lidar bias and standard deviation were computed across all four marsh systems and four major taxa using varying interpolation and filtering methods. The effects of seasonality were also investigated using lidar data acquired in the summer and the following spring. Relative uncertainty surfaces (RUS) were computed from lidar waveform-derived metrics and examined for their utility and correlation with individual lidar errors. The results clearly illustrate the importance of seasonality, species, and lidar interpolation and filtering methods on elevation uncertainty in salt marshes. Results also demonstrate that RUS generated from lidar waveform features are useful in qualitative assessments of lidar elevation uncertainty and correlate well with vegetation height (r = 0.85; n = 268). Knowledge of where DRL uncertainty persists within salt marshes and the factors influencing the higher uncertainty should facilitate the development of better correction methods.</description><subject>Assessments</subject><subject>bare earth filtering</subject><subject>Bias</subject><subject>Data collection</subject><subject>Datasets</subject><subject>DEM</subject><subject>Elevation</subject><subject>Error rates</subject><subject>Filtering</subject><subject>Filtration</subject><subject>Funding</subject><subject>Interpolation</subject><subject>inverse distance weighting</subject><subject>Lidar</subject><subject>Marshes</subject><subject>Plant species</subject><subject>Remote sensing</subject><subject>Salt marsh vegetation</subject><subject>Salt marshes</subject><subject>Sea level</subject><subject>Seasonal variations</subject><subject>Shoreline protection</subject><subject>Signal processing</subject><subject>Soil erosion</subject><subject>Spartina alterniflora</subject><subject>Standard deviation</subject><subject>Studies</subject><subject>Time series</subject><subject>Topographical elevation</subject><subject>Uncertainty</subject><subject>Vegetation</subject><subject>Waveforms</subject><issn>0749-0208</issn><issn>1551-5036</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2016</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><recordid>eNqNkVtLAzEQhYMoWC_gHxACgviyOkmTTfZRtF6gInjBxyXdndWUbaJJtuC_N6XigyDIPAzDfHOYwyHkgMEpZ4yfPd6qsgAGG2TEpGSFhHG5SUagRFUAB71NdmKcA7BSCzUi_XmMGOMCXaK-o5MelyZZ7-izazAkY136pNbRR9MnemdCfKMTt7TBu9VJpEO07pVe2tgETFg8YBqCo8a19Gro--LFLLHzYUGntjVhj2x1po-4_913yfPV5OnippjeX99enE-LmQCdirYyWlS6lU3DWtUYUKA7nQ2U0uQZuWKSdUIBamVAcFExLlQ3azQyIyoz3iUna9334D8GjKle5Aex741DP8SaaVVV2T7X_0BLPealgiqjR7_Quc9ms5FMyVKXY5nrR7AJPsaAXf0e7MKEz5pBvUqoXiVU54QyerhG5zH58MMJAYpLIfL-eL2fWe8d_i30Bdxrl-k</recordid><startdate>20161201</startdate><enddate>20161201</enddate><creator>Rogers, Jeffrey N</creator><creator>Parrish, Christopher E</creator><creator>Ward, Larry G</creator><creator>Burdick, David M</creator><general>Coastal Education and Research Foundation</general><general>Coastal Education and Research Foundation, Inc. CERF</general><general>Allen Press Inc</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QF</scope><scope>7QL</scope><scope>7QQ</scope><scope>7SC</scope><scope>7SE</scope><scope>7SP</scope><scope>7SR</scope><scope>7T7</scope><scope>7TA</scope><scope>7TB</scope><scope>7TN</scope><scope>7U5</scope><scope>7U9</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88I</scope><scope>8BQ</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABJCF</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>BKSAR</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>F28</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>H8D</scope><scope>H8G</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>H96</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>JG9</scope><scope>JQ2</scope><scope>KR7</scope><scope>L.G</scope><scope>L6V</scope><scope>L7M</scope><scope>L~C</scope><scope>L~D</scope><scope>M2P</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>M7S</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PCBAR</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PTHSS</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><scope>Q9U</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20161201</creationdate><title>Assessment of Elevation Uncertainty in Salt Marsh Environments using Discrete-Return and Full-Waveform Lidar</title><author>Rogers, Jeffrey N ; Parrish, Christopher E ; Ward, Larry G ; Burdick, David M</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-b408t-d9a8498d5cc1d7ca0708f874965ad7ce27151f470e87a042491247fbc8e1a49a3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2016</creationdate><topic>Assessments</topic><topic>bare earth filtering</topic><topic>Bias</topic><topic>Data collection</topic><topic>Datasets</topic><topic>DEM</topic><topic>Elevation</topic><topic>Error rates</topic><topic>Filtering</topic><topic>Filtration</topic><topic>Funding</topic><topic>Interpolation</topic><topic>inverse distance weighting</topic><topic>Lidar</topic><topic>Marshes</topic><topic>Plant species</topic><topic>Remote sensing</topic><topic>Salt marsh vegetation</topic><topic>Salt marshes</topic><topic>Sea level</topic><topic>Seasonal variations</topic><topic>Shoreline protection</topic><topic>Signal processing</topic><topic>Soil erosion</topic><topic>Spartina alterniflora</topic><topic>Standard deviation</topic><topic>Studies</topic><topic>Time series</topic><topic>Topographical elevation</topic><topic>Uncertainty</topic><topic>Vegetation</topic><topic>Waveforms</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Rogers, Jeffrey N</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Parrish, Christopher E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ward, Larry G</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Burdick, David M</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Aluminium Industry Abstracts</collection><collection>Bacteriology Abstracts (Microbiology B)</collection><collection>Ceramic Abstracts</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts</collection><collection>Corrosion Abstracts</collection><collection>Electronics &amp; Communications Abstracts</collection><collection>Engineered Materials Abstracts</collection><collection>Industrial and Applied Microbiology Abstracts (Microbiology A)</collection><collection>Materials Business File</collection><collection>Mechanical &amp; Transportation Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Oceanic Abstracts</collection><collection>Solid State and Superconductivity Abstracts</collection><collection>Virology and AIDS Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>METADEX</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Materials Science &amp; Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Agricultural &amp; Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Earth, Atmospheric &amp; Aquatic Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>ANTE: Abstracts in New Technology &amp; Engineering</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Aerospace Database</collection><collection>Copper Technical Reference Library</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 2: Ocean Technology, Policy &amp; Non-Living Resources</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>Materials Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Computer Science Collection</collection><collection>Civil Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><collection>ProQuest Engineering Collection</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts – Academic</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts Professional</collection><collection>Science Database</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>Engineering Database</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>Earth, Atmospheric &amp; Aquatic Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>Engineering Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><jtitle>Journal of coastal research</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Rogers, Jeffrey N</au><au>Parrish, Christopher E</au><au>Ward, Larry G</au><au>Burdick, David M</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Assessment of Elevation Uncertainty in Salt Marsh Environments using Discrete-Return and Full-Waveform Lidar</atitle><jtitle>Journal of coastal research</jtitle><date>2016-12-01</date><risdate>2016</risdate><volume>76</volume><issue>sp1</issue><spage>107</spage><epage>122</epage><pages>107-122</pages><issn>0749-0208</issn><eissn>1551-5036</eissn><abstract>Rogers, J.N.; Parrish, C.E.; Ward, L.G., and Burdick, D.M., 2016. Assessment of elevation uncertainty in salt marsh environments using discrete-return and full-waveform lidar. In: Brock, J.C.; Gesch, D.B.; Parrish, C.E.; Rogers, J.N., and Wright, C.W. (eds.), Advances in Topobathymetric Mapping, Models, and Applications. Journal of Coastal Research, Special Issue, No. 76, pp. 107–122. Coconut Creek (Florida), ISSN 0749-0208. Lidar data can serve as an important source of elevation information for studying, monitoring and managing salt marshes. However, previous studies have shown that lidar data tend to have greater vertical uncertainty in salt marshes than in other environments, hindering the ability to resolve small elevation differences that can be ecologically significant in marshes. For coastal scientists and managers to effectively collect, evaluate, and/or use lidar data in salt marshes, factors affecting elevation uncertainty (e.g., plant species, season, and lidar processing methods) must be well understood. This study addresses this need using discrete-return (DRL) and full-waveform lidar, along with field-surveyed reference data, for four marshes on Cape Cod, Massachusetts (USA). The lidar bias and standard deviation were computed across all four marsh systems and four major taxa using varying interpolation and filtering methods. The effects of seasonality were also investigated using lidar data acquired in the summer and the following spring. Relative uncertainty surfaces (RUS) were computed from lidar waveform-derived metrics and examined for their utility and correlation with individual lidar errors. The results clearly illustrate the importance of seasonality, species, and lidar interpolation and filtering methods on elevation uncertainty in salt marshes. Results also demonstrate that RUS generated from lidar waveform features are useful in qualitative assessments of lidar elevation uncertainty and correlate well with vegetation height (r = 0.85; n = 268). Knowledge of where DRL uncertainty persists within salt marshes and the factors influencing the higher uncertainty should facilitate the development of better correction methods.</abstract><cop>Fort Lauderdale</cop><pub>Coastal Education and Research Foundation</pub><doi>10.2112/SI76-010</doi><tpages>16</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0749-0208
ispartof Journal of coastal research, 2016-12, Vol.76 (sp1), p.107-122
issn 0749-0208
1551-5036
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1879984728
source Jstor Complete Legacy
subjects Assessments
bare earth filtering
Bias
Data collection
Datasets
DEM
Elevation
Error rates
Filtering
Filtration
Funding
Interpolation
inverse distance weighting
Lidar
Marshes
Plant species
Remote sensing
Salt marsh vegetation
Salt marshes
Sea level
Seasonal variations
Shoreline protection
Signal processing
Soil erosion
Spartina alterniflora
Standard deviation
Studies
Time series
Topographical elevation
Uncertainty
Vegetation
Waveforms
title Assessment of Elevation Uncertainty in Salt Marsh Environments using Discrete-Return and Full-Waveform Lidar
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-13T00%3A09%3A10IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Assessment%20of%20Elevation%20Uncertainty%20in%20Salt%20Marsh%20Environments%20using%20Discrete-Return%20and%20Full-Waveform%20Lidar&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20coastal%20research&rft.au=Rogers,%20Jeffrey%20N&rft.date=2016-12-01&rft.volume=76&rft.issue=sp1&rft.spage=107&rft.epage=122&rft.pages=107-122&rft.issn=0749-0208&rft.eissn=1551-5036&rft_id=info:doi/10.2112/SI76-010&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_proqu%3E44072544%3C/jstor_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1856863535&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_jstor_id=44072544&rfr_iscdi=true