The Scale of Resource Specialization and the Distribution and Abundance of Lycaenid Butterflies
Numerous hypotheses have been proposed for the commonly observed, positive relationship between local abundance and geographic distribution in groups of closely related species. Here I consider how hostplant specialization and abundance affect the relative abundance and distribution of lycaenid butt...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Oecologia 2000-05, Vol.123 (3), p.375-383 |
---|---|
1. Verfasser: | |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 383 |
---|---|
container_issue | 3 |
container_start_page | 375 |
container_title | Oecologia |
container_volume | 123 |
creator | Hughes, Jennifer B. |
description | Numerous hypotheses have been proposed for the commonly observed, positive relationship between local abundance and geographic distribution in groups of closely related species. Here I consider how hostplant specialization and abundance affect the relative abundance and distribution of lycaenid butterflies (Lepidoptera: Lycaenidae). I first discuss three components of specialization: local specialization, turnover of specialization across a species' range, and the minimum number of resources (or habitats) required by a species. Within this framework, I then consider one dimension of a lycaenid species' niche, larval hostplant specialization. In a subalpine region of Colorado, I surveyed 11 lycaenid species and their hostplants at 17 sites. I compare this local information to continental hostplant use and large-scale distributions of the lycaenids and their hostplants. Local abundance of a lycaenid species is positively correlated with its local distribution (the number of sites occupied), but not with its regional or continental distribution. Neither local specialization (the number of hostplants used within one habitat) nor continental specialization (the number of hostplants used across many habitats) is correlated with local lycaenid abundance. Continental specialization is positively correlated with a species' continental distribution, however. Finally, while generalist butterflies tend to have more hostplant available to them, differences in resource availability do not explain the differences in butterfly abundance. Although local abundance is correlated only with local distribution, I suggest that abundance-distribution relationships might emerge at regional and continental scales if local abundance were averaged across many habitat types. Consideration of the scale of a species' resource specialization (within or among habitats) appears to be key to understanding the relationships between resource specialization, resource availability, and a species' abundance and distribution. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1007/s004420051024 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>jstor_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1878831249</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>4222630</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>4222630</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c372t-1d025205e949083e9834cbd43da2312c8d634c642b5ecd282d38ee43ce1cea473</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp90M1v1DAQBXALUdGlcOSGUA4IcUkZz9gb-9iWj1ZaCQnKOXLsiXCVTRY7OZS_HtNdFnHhZOn552fpCfFCwrkEaN5lAKUQQEtA9UispCKspSX7WKwA0NZGK3sqnuZ8ByCV1PqJOEVDYLTFlWhvv3P11buBq6mvvnCeluRLsmMf3RB_ujlOY-XGUM0Fvo95TrFbjuFFt4zBjf7h9ebeOx5jqC6XeebUD5HzM3HSuyHz88N5Jr59_HB7dV1vPn-6ubrY1J4anGsZADWCZqssGGJrSPkuKAoOSaI3YV2CtcJOsw9oMJBhVuRZenaqoTPxdt-7S9OPhfPcbmP2PAxu5GnJrTSNMaVJ2ULf_J82mhQQFVjvoU9Tzon7dpfi1qX7VkL7e_z2n_GLf3UoXroth6P-s3YBrw_A5TJ5n8pyMf9tVZrw4d-Xe3aX5ykdrxUirgnoF07AlAY</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>17534033</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>The Scale of Resource Specialization and the Distribution and Abundance of Lycaenid Butterflies</title><source>Jstor Complete Legacy</source><source>Springer Nature - Complete Springer Journals</source><creator>Hughes, Jennifer B.</creator><creatorcontrib>Hughes, Jennifer B.</creatorcontrib><description>Numerous hypotheses have been proposed for the commonly observed, positive relationship between local abundance and geographic distribution in groups of closely related species. Here I consider how hostplant specialization and abundance affect the relative abundance and distribution of lycaenid butterflies (Lepidoptera: Lycaenidae). I first discuss three components of specialization: local specialization, turnover of specialization across a species' range, and the minimum number of resources (or habitats) required by a species. Within this framework, I then consider one dimension of a lycaenid species' niche, larval hostplant specialization. In a subalpine region of Colorado, I surveyed 11 lycaenid species and their hostplants at 17 sites. I compare this local information to continental hostplant use and large-scale distributions of the lycaenids and their hostplants. Local abundance of a lycaenid species is positively correlated with its local distribution (the number of sites occupied), but not with its regional or continental distribution. Neither local specialization (the number of hostplants used within one habitat) nor continental specialization (the number of hostplants used across many habitats) is correlated with local lycaenid abundance. Continental specialization is positively correlated with a species' continental distribution, however. Finally, while generalist butterflies tend to have more hostplant available to them, differences in resource availability do not explain the differences in butterfly abundance. Although local abundance is correlated only with local distribution, I suggest that abundance-distribution relationships might emerge at regional and continental scales if local abundance were averaged across many habitat types. Consideration of the scale of a species' resource specialization (within or among habitats) appears to be key to understanding the relationships between resource specialization, resource availability, and a species' abundance and distribution.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0029-8549</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1432-1939</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s004420051024</identifier><identifier>PMID: 28308592</identifier><identifier>CODEN: OECOBX</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Berlin: Springer-Verlag</publisher><subject>Animal and plant ecology ; Animal, plant and microbial ecology ; Animals ; Ants ; Biological and medical sciences ; Butterflies ; Demecology ; Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology ; Genera ; Habitat conservation ; Habitats ; Insect larvae ; Lycaenidae ; Plants ; Population ecology ; Protozoa. Invertebrata ; Species ; USA, Colorado ; Wildlife habitats</subject><ispartof>Oecologia, 2000-05, Vol.123 (3), p.375-383</ispartof><rights>Copyright 2000 Springer-Verlag</rights><rights>2000 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c372t-1d025205e949083e9834cbd43da2312c8d634c642b5ecd282d38ee43ce1cea473</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/4222630$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/4222630$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,777,781,800,27905,27906,57998,58231</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=1453233$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28308592$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Hughes, Jennifer B.</creatorcontrib><title>The Scale of Resource Specialization and the Distribution and Abundance of Lycaenid Butterflies</title><title>Oecologia</title><addtitle>Oecologia</addtitle><description>Numerous hypotheses have been proposed for the commonly observed, positive relationship between local abundance and geographic distribution in groups of closely related species. Here I consider how hostplant specialization and abundance affect the relative abundance and distribution of lycaenid butterflies (Lepidoptera: Lycaenidae). I first discuss three components of specialization: local specialization, turnover of specialization across a species' range, and the minimum number of resources (or habitats) required by a species. Within this framework, I then consider one dimension of a lycaenid species' niche, larval hostplant specialization. In a subalpine region of Colorado, I surveyed 11 lycaenid species and their hostplants at 17 sites. I compare this local information to continental hostplant use and large-scale distributions of the lycaenids and their hostplants. Local abundance of a lycaenid species is positively correlated with its local distribution (the number of sites occupied), but not with its regional or continental distribution. Neither local specialization (the number of hostplants used within one habitat) nor continental specialization (the number of hostplants used across many habitats) is correlated with local lycaenid abundance. Continental specialization is positively correlated with a species' continental distribution, however. Finally, while generalist butterflies tend to have more hostplant available to them, differences in resource availability do not explain the differences in butterfly abundance. Although local abundance is correlated only with local distribution, I suggest that abundance-distribution relationships might emerge at regional and continental scales if local abundance were averaged across many habitat types. Consideration of the scale of a species' resource specialization (within or among habitats) appears to be key to understanding the relationships between resource specialization, resource availability, and a species' abundance and distribution.</description><subject>Animal and plant ecology</subject><subject>Animal, plant and microbial ecology</subject><subject>Animals</subject><subject>Ants</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Butterflies</subject><subject>Demecology</subject><subject>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</subject><subject>Genera</subject><subject>Habitat conservation</subject><subject>Habitats</subject><subject>Insect larvae</subject><subject>Lycaenidae</subject><subject>Plants</subject><subject>Population ecology</subject><subject>Protozoa. Invertebrata</subject><subject>Species</subject><subject>USA, Colorado</subject><subject>Wildlife habitats</subject><issn>0029-8549</issn><issn>1432-1939</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2000</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp90M1v1DAQBXALUdGlcOSGUA4IcUkZz9gb-9iWj1ZaCQnKOXLsiXCVTRY7OZS_HtNdFnHhZOn552fpCfFCwrkEaN5lAKUQQEtA9UispCKspSX7WKwA0NZGK3sqnuZ8ByCV1PqJOEVDYLTFlWhvv3P11buBq6mvvnCeluRLsmMf3RB_ujlOY-XGUM0Fvo95TrFbjuFFt4zBjf7h9ebeOx5jqC6XeebUD5HzM3HSuyHz88N5Jr59_HB7dV1vPn-6ubrY1J4anGsZADWCZqssGGJrSPkuKAoOSaI3YV2CtcJOsw9oMJBhVuRZenaqoTPxdt-7S9OPhfPcbmP2PAxu5GnJrTSNMaVJ2ULf_J82mhQQFVjvoU9Tzon7dpfi1qX7VkL7e_z2n_GLf3UoXroth6P-s3YBrw_A5TJ5n8pyMf9tVZrw4d-Xe3aX5ykdrxUirgnoF07AlAY</recordid><startdate>20000501</startdate><enddate>20000501</enddate><creator>Hughes, Jennifer B.</creator><general>Springer-Verlag</general><general>Springer</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7SS</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20000501</creationdate><title>The Scale of Resource Specialization and the Distribution and Abundance of Lycaenid Butterflies</title><author>Hughes, Jennifer B.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c372t-1d025205e949083e9834cbd43da2312c8d634c642b5ecd282d38ee43ce1cea473</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2000</creationdate><topic>Animal and plant ecology</topic><topic>Animal, plant and microbial ecology</topic><topic>Animals</topic><topic>Ants</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Butterflies</topic><topic>Demecology</topic><topic>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</topic><topic>Genera</topic><topic>Habitat conservation</topic><topic>Habitats</topic><topic>Insect larvae</topic><topic>Lycaenidae</topic><topic>Plants</topic><topic>Population ecology</topic><topic>Protozoa. Invertebrata</topic><topic>Species</topic><topic>USA, Colorado</topic><topic>Wildlife habitats</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Hughes, Jennifer B.</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Entomology Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Oecologia</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Hughes, Jennifer B.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>The Scale of Resource Specialization and the Distribution and Abundance of Lycaenid Butterflies</atitle><jtitle>Oecologia</jtitle><addtitle>Oecologia</addtitle><date>2000-05-01</date><risdate>2000</risdate><volume>123</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>375</spage><epage>383</epage><pages>375-383</pages><issn>0029-8549</issn><eissn>1432-1939</eissn><coden>OECOBX</coden><abstract>Numerous hypotheses have been proposed for the commonly observed, positive relationship between local abundance and geographic distribution in groups of closely related species. Here I consider how hostplant specialization and abundance affect the relative abundance and distribution of lycaenid butterflies (Lepidoptera: Lycaenidae). I first discuss three components of specialization: local specialization, turnover of specialization across a species' range, and the minimum number of resources (or habitats) required by a species. Within this framework, I then consider one dimension of a lycaenid species' niche, larval hostplant specialization. In a subalpine region of Colorado, I surveyed 11 lycaenid species and their hostplants at 17 sites. I compare this local information to continental hostplant use and large-scale distributions of the lycaenids and their hostplants. Local abundance of a lycaenid species is positively correlated with its local distribution (the number of sites occupied), but not with its regional or continental distribution. Neither local specialization (the number of hostplants used within one habitat) nor continental specialization (the number of hostplants used across many habitats) is correlated with local lycaenid abundance. Continental specialization is positively correlated with a species' continental distribution, however. Finally, while generalist butterflies tend to have more hostplant available to them, differences in resource availability do not explain the differences in butterfly abundance. Although local abundance is correlated only with local distribution, I suggest that abundance-distribution relationships might emerge at regional and continental scales if local abundance were averaged across many habitat types. Consideration of the scale of a species' resource specialization (within or among habitats) appears to be key to understanding the relationships between resource specialization, resource availability, and a species' abundance and distribution.</abstract><cop>Berlin</cop><pub>Springer-Verlag</pub><pmid>28308592</pmid><doi>10.1007/s004420051024</doi><tpages>9</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0029-8549 |
ispartof | Oecologia, 2000-05, Vol.123 (3), p.375-383 |
issn | 0029-8549 1432-1939 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1878831249 |
source | Jstor Complete Legacy; Springer Nature - Complete Springer Journals |
subjects | Animal and plant ecology Animal, plant and microbial ecology Animals Ants Biological and medical sciences Butterflies Demecology Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology Genera Habitat conservation Habitats Insect larvae Lycaenidae Plants Population ecology Protozoa. Invertebrata Species USA, Colorado Wildlife habitats |
title | The Scale of Resource Specialization and the Distribution and Abundance of Lycaenid Butterflies |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-20T13%3A16%3A04IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20Scale%20of%20Resource%20Specialization%20and%20the%20Distribution%20and%20Abundance%20of%20Lycaenid%20Butterflies&rft.jtitle=Oecologia&rft.au=Hughes,%20Jennifer%20B.&rft.date=2000-05-01&rft.volume=123&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=375&rft.epage=383&rft.pages=375-383&rft.issn=0029-8549&rft.eissn=1432-1939&rft.coden=OECOBX&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s004420051024&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_proqu%3E4222630%3C/jstor_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=17534033&rft_id=info:pmid/28308592&rft_jstor_id=4222630&rfr_iscdi=true |