Size and fecundity hierarchies in an herbaceous perennial

Inequalities in size in populations have potentially important effects on fitness but have rarely been examined in natural populations. I measured size (number of culms) and fecundity (number of spikelets) in five populations of the grass Danthonia spicata from 1981 to 1985. The populations were in...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Oecologia 1987-11, Vol.74 (1), p.128-132
1. Verfasser: Scheiner, S.M
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 132
container_issue 1
container_start_page 128
container_title Oecologia
container_volume 74
creator Scheiner, S.M
description Inequalities in size in populations have potentially important effects on fitness but have rarely been examined in natural populations. I measured size (number of culms) and fecundity (number of spikelets) in five populations of the grass Danthonia spicata from 1981 to 1985. The populations were in sites in a Pinus-Quercus-Populus forest in northern lower Michigan, USA comprising a secondary succession sequence. The sites had been burned in 1980, 1954, 1948, 1936, and 1911, respectively. Mean sizes and fecundities and the amount of hierarchy in size and fecundity, measured by the Gini coefficient, were compared between the YOUNG population, 1980 burn site, and the OLD populations, 1954, 1948, 1936, and 1911 burn sites. I found large differences in mean size and fecundity between the YOUNG and OLD populations with much larger individuals in the YOUNG population. No differences in size hierarchies were found in either the first year of measurement or after five years. The fecundity hierarchies showed no significant difference among the populations in the first year but after five years the YOUNG population showed a significant decrease in amount of inequality. The long-term patterns of size and fecundity hierarchies differed because fecundity was a cumulative trait while size was not. Size inequalities may not always be a good measure of fecundity inequalities. Short-term measures of inequality in perennials may not be a good indicator of long-term values. In contrast to greenhouse studies, habitat light levels did not affect size hierarchies although they did affect fecundity hierarchies.
doi_str_mv 10.1007/BF00377356
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>jstor_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1878829213</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>4218441</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>4218441</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c390t-bf3c5366e4436349a97774b66dde5825bd8c9d8b6f71dc903865ff8fb8d737213</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp90L1LAzEYBvAgiq3VxVn0BhERTt98J6OKVUFwUOcjlw-9cr2rSTvoX29Ka92c3uH58ZA8CB1iuMQA8upmDEClpFxsoSFmlJRYU72NhgBEl4ozPUB7KU0AMMOc76IBURQDI3yI9Evz7QvTuSJ4u-hcM_8qPhofTbT5pKLpclh8-Fgb6_tFKmY--q5rTLuPdoJpkz9Y3xF6G9-93j6UT8_3j7fXT6WlGuZlHajlVAjPGBWUaaOllKwWwjnPFeG1U1Y7VYsgsbMaqBI8BBVq5SSVBNMROl_1zmL_ufBpXk2bZH3bmm75oAorqRTRWWZ69j9ligEVJMOLFbSxTyn6UM1iMzXxq8JQLTet_jbN-Hjduqin3m3o74gZnK6BSda0IZrONmnjcgsWYsmOVmyS5n3cxIxgxdjynyerOJi-Mu8xN7y9EMAUCAgFTNIf1mWOFw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>14840362</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Size and fecundity hierarchies in an herbaceous perennial</title><source>SpringerNature Journals</source><source>JSTOR Archive Collection A-Z Listing</source><creator>Scheiner, S.M</creator><creatorcontrib>Scheiner, S.M</creatorcontrib><description>Inequalities in size in populations have potentially important effects on fitness but have rarely been examined in natural populations. I measured size (number of culms) and fecundity (number of spikelets) in five populations of the grass Danthonia spicata from 1981 to 1985. The populations were in sites in a Pinus-Quercus-Populus forest in northern lower Michigan, USA comprising a secondary succession sequence. The sites had been burned in 1980, 1954, 1948, 1936, and 1911, respectively. Mean sizes and fecundities and the amount of hierarchy in size and fecundity, measured by the Gini coefficient, were compared between the YOUNG population, 1980 burn site, and the OLD populations, 1954, 1948, 1936, and 1911 burn sites. I found large differences in mean size and fecundity between the YOUNG and OLD populations with much larger individuals in the YOUNG population. No differences in size hierarchies were found in either the first year of measurement or after five years. The fecundity hierarchies showed no significant difference among the populations in the first year but after five years the YOUNG population showed a significant decrease in amount of inequality. The long-term patterns of size and fecundity hierarchies differed because fecundity was a cumulative trait while size was not. Size inequalities may not always be a good measure of fecundity inequalities. Short-term measures of inequality in perennials may not be a good indicator of long-term values. In contrast to greenhouse studies, habitat light levels did not affect size hierarchies although they did affect fecundity hierarchies.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0029-8549</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1432-1939</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/BF00377356</identifier><identifier>PMID: 28310425</identifier><identifier>CODEN: OECOBX</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Berlin: Springer-Verlag</publisher><subject>Animal and plant ecology ; Animal, plant and microbial ecology ; Biological and medical sciences ; Danthonia spicata ; Demecology ; Ecological competition ; Fecundity ; Forest succession ; Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology ; Gini coefficient ; Habitats ; perennials ; Plants ; Plants and fungi ; Population distributions ; Population ecology ; Population mean ; Population size ; size</subject><ispartof>Oecologia, 1987-11, Vol.74 (1), p.128-132</ispartof><rights>Copyright 1987 Springer-Verlag</rights><rights>1988 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c390t-bf3c5366e4436349a97774b66dde5825bd8c9d8b6f71dc903865ff8fb8d737213</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c390t-bf3c5366e4436349a97774b66dde5825bd8c9d8b6f71dc903865ff8fb8d737213</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/4218441$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/4218441$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,803,27924,27925,58017,58250</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=7731665$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28310425$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Scheiner, S.M</creatorcontrib><title>Size and fecundity hierarchies in an herbaceous perennial</title><title>Oecologia</title><addtitle>Oecologia</addtitle><description>Inequalities in size in populations have potentially important effects on fitness but have rarely been examined in natural populations. I measured size (number of culms) and fecundity (number of spikelets) in five populations of the grass Danthonia spicata from 1981 to 1985. The populations were in sites in a Pinus-Quercus-Populus forest in northern lower Michigan, USA comprising a secondary succession sequence. The sites had been burned in 1980, 1954, 1948, 1936, and 1911, respectively. Mean sizes and fecundities and the amount of hierarchy in size and fecundity, measured by the Gini coefficient, were compared between the YOUNG population, 1980 burn site, and the OLD populations, 1954, 1948, 1936, and 1911 burn sites. I found large differences in mean size and fecundity between the YOUNG and OLD populations with much larger individuals in the YOUNG population. No differences in size hierarchies were found in either the first year of measurement or after five years. The fecundity hierarchies showed no significant difference among the populations in the first year but after five years the YOUNG population showed a significant decrease in amount of inequality. The long-term patterns of size and fecundity hierarchies differed because fecundity was a cumulative trait while size was not. Size inequalities may not always be a good measure of fecundity inequalities. Short-term measures of inequality in perennials may not be a good indicator of long-term values. In contrast to greenhouse studies, habitat light levels did not affect size hierarchies although they did affect fecundity hierarchies.</description><subject>Animal and plant ecology</subject><subject>Animal, plant and microbial ecology</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Danthonia spicata</subject><subject>Demecology</subject><subject>Ecological competition</subject><subject>Fecundity</subject><subject>Forest succession</subject><subject>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</subject><subject>Gini coefficient</subject><subject>Habitats</subject><subject>perennials</subject><subject>Plants</subject><subject>Plants and fungi</subject><subject>Population distributions</subject><subject>Population ecology</subject><subject>Population mean</subject><subject>Population size</subject><subject>size</subject><issn>0029-8549</issn><issn>1432-1939</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1987</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp90L1LAzEYBvAgiq3VxVn0BhERTt98J6OKVUFwUOcjlw-9cr2rSTvoX29Ka92c3uH58ZA8CB1iuMQA8upmDEClpFxsoSFmlJRYU72NhgBEl4ozPUB7KU0AMMOc76IBURQDI3yI9Evz7QvTuSJ4u-hcM_8qPhofTbT5pKLpclh8-Fgb6_tFKmY--q5rTLuPdoJpkz9Y3xF6G9-93j6UT8_3j7fXT6WlGuZlHajlVAjPGBWUaaOllKwWwjnPFeG1U1Y7VYsgsbMaqBI8BBVq5SSVBNMROl_1zmL_ufBpXk2bZH3bmm75oAorqRTRWWZ69j9ligEVJMOLFbSxTyn6UM1iMzXxq8JQLTet_jbN-Hjduqin3m3o74gZnK6BSda0IZrONmnjcgsWYsmOVmyS5n3cxIxgxdjynyerOJi-Mu8xN7y9EMAUCAgFTNIf1mWOFw</recordid><startdate>19871101</startdate><enddate>19871101</enddate><creator>Scheiner, S.M</creator><general>Springer-Verlag</general><general>Springer</general><scope>FBQ</scope><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>19871101</creationdate><title>Size and fecundity hierarchies in an herbaceous perennial</title><author>Scheiner, S.M</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c390t-bf3c5366e4436349a97774b66dde5825bd8c9d8b6f71dc903865ff8fb8d737213</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1987</creationdate><topic>Animal and plant ecology</topic><topic>Animal, plant and microbial ecology</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Danthonia spicata</topic><topic>Demecology</topic><topic>Ecological competition</topic><topic>Fecundity</topic><topic>Forest succession</topic><topic>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</topic><topic>Gini coefficient</topic><topic>Habitats</topic><topic>perennials</topic><topic>Plants</topic><topic>Plants and fungi</topic><topic>Population distributions</topic><topic>Population ecology</topic><topic>Population mean</topic><topic>Population size</topic><topic>size</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Scheiner, S.M</creatorcontrib><collection>AGRIS</collection><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Oecologia</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Scheiner, S.M</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Size and fecundity hierarchies in an herbaceous perennial</atitle><jtitle>Oecologia</jtitle><addtitle>Oecologia</addtitle><date>1987-11-01</date><risdate>1987</risdate><volume>74</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>128</spage><epage>132</epage><pages>128-132</pages><issn>0029-8549</issn><eissn>1432-1939</eissn><coden>OECOBX</coden><abstract>Inequalities in size in populations have potentially important effects on fitness but have rarely been examined in natural populations. I measured size (number of culms) and fecundity (number of spikelets) in five populations of the grass Danthonia spicata from 1981 to 1985. The populations were in sites in a Pinus-Quercus-Populus forest in northern lower Michigan, USA comprising a secondary succession sequence. The sites had been burned in 1980, 1954, 1948, 1936, and 1911, respectively. Mean sizes and fecundities and the amount of hierarchy in size and fecundity, measured by the Gini coefficient, were compared between the YOUNG population, 1980 burn site, and the OLD populations, 1954, 1948, 1936, and 1911 burn sites. I found large differences in mean size and fecundity between the YOUNG and OLD populations with much larger individuals in the YOUNG population. No differences in size hierarchies were found in either the first year of measurement or after five years. The fecundity hierarchies showed no significant difference among the populations in the first year but after five years the YOUNG population showed a significant decrease in amount of inequality. The long-term patterns of size and fecundity hierarchies differed because fecundity was a cumulative trait while size was not. Size inequalities may not always be a good measure of fecundity inequalities. Short-term measures of inequality in perennials may not be a good indicator of long-term values. In contrast to greenhouse studies, habitat light levels did not affect size hierarchies although they did affect fecundity hierarchies.</abstract><cop>Berlin</cop><pub>Springer-Verlag</pub><pmid>28310425</pmid><doi>10.1007/BF00377356</doi><tpages>5</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0029-8549
ispartof Oecologia, 1987-11, Vol.74 (1), p.128-132
issn 0029-8549
1432-1939
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1878829213
source SpringerNature Journals; JSTOR Archive Collection A-Z Listing
subjects Animal and plant ecology
Animal, plant and microbial ecology
Biological and medical sciences
Danthonia spicata
Demecology
Ecological competition
Fecundity
Forest succession
Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology
Gini coefficient
Habitats
perennials
Plants
Plants and fungi
Population distributions
Population ecology
Population mean
Population size
size
title Size and fecundity hierarchies in an herbaceous perennial
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-04T05%3A48%3A41IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Size%20and%20fecundity%20hierarchies%20in%20an%20herbaceous%20perennial&rft.jtitle=Oecologia&rft.au=Scheiner,%20S.M&rft.date=1987-11-01&rft.volume=74&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=128&rft.epage=132&rft.pages=128-132&rft.issn=0029-8549&rft.eissn=1432-1939&rft.coden=OECOBX&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/BF00377356&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_proqu%3E4218441%3C/jstor_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=14840362&rft_id=info:pmid/28310425&rft_jstor_id=4218441&rfr_iscdi=true