Size and fecundity hierarchies in an herbaceous perennial
Inequalities in size in populations have potentially important effects on fitness but have rarely been examined in natural populations. I measured size (number of culms) and fecundity (number of spikelets) in five populations of the grass Danthonia spicata from 1981 to 1985. The populations were in...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Oecologia 1987-11, Vol.74 (1), p.128-132 |
---|---|
1. Verfasser: | |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 132 |
---|---|
container_issue | 1 |
container_start_page | 128 |
container_title | Oecologia |
container_volume | 74 |
creator | Scheiner, S.M |
description | Inequalities in size in populations have potentially important effects on fitness but have rarely been examined in natural populations. I measured size (number of culms) and fecundity (number of spikelets) in five populations of the grass Danthonia spicata from 1981 to 1985. The populations were in sites in a Pinus-Quercus-Populus forest in northern lower Michigan, USA comprising a secondary succession sequence. The sites had been burned in 1980, 1954, 1948, 1936, and 1911, respectively. Mean sizes and fecundities and the amount of hierarchy in size and fecundity, measured by the Gini coefficient, were compared between the YOUNG population, 1980 burn site, and the OLD populations, 1954, 1948, 1936, and 1911 burn sites. I found large differences in mean size and fecundity between the YOUNG and OLD populations with much larger individuals in the YOUNG population. No differences in size hierarchies were found in either the first year of measurement or after five years. The fecundity hierarchies showed no significant difference among the populations in the first year but after five years the YOUNG population showed a significant decrease in amount of inequality. The long-term patterns of size and fecundity hierarchies differed because fecundity was a cumulative trait while size was not. Size inequalities may not always be a good measure of fecundity inequalities. Short-term measures of inequality in perennials may not be a good indicator of long-term values. In contrast to greenhouse studies, habitat light levels did not affect size hierarchies although they did affect fecundity hierarchies. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1007/BF00377356 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>jstor_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1878829213</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>4218441</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>4218441</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c390t-bf3c5366e4436349a97774b66dde5825bd8c9d8b6f71dc903865ff8fb8d737213</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp90L1LAzEYBvAgiq3VxVn0BhERTt98J6OKVUFwUOcjlw-9cr2rSTvoX29Ka92c3uH58ZA8CB1iuMQA8upmDEClpFxsoSFmlJRYU72NhgBEl4ozPUB7KU0AMMOc76IBURQDI3yI9Evz7QvTuSJ4u-hcM_8qPhofTbT5pKLpclh8-Fgb6_tFKmY--q5rTLuPdoJpkz9Y3xF6G9-93j6UT8_3j7fXT6WlGuZlHajlVAjPGBWUaaOllKwWwjnPFeG1U1Y7VYsgsbMaqBI8BBVq5SSVBNMROl_1zmL_ufBpXk2bZH3bmm75oAorqRTRWWZ69j9ligEVJMOLFbSxTyn6UM1iMzXxq8JQLTet_jbN-Hjduqin3m3o74gZnK6BSda0IZrONmnjcgsWYsmOVmyS5n3cxIxgxdjynyerOJi-Mu8xN7y9EMAUCAgFTNIf1mWOFw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>14840362</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Size and fecundity hierarchies in an herbaceous perennial</title><source>SpringerNature Journals</source><source>JSTOR Archive Collection A-Z Listing</source><creator>Scheiner, S.M</creator><creatorcontrib>Scheiner, S.M</creatorcontrib><description>Inequalities in size in populations have potentially important effects on fitness but have rarely been examined in natural populations. I measured size (number of culms) and fecundity (number of spikelets) in five populations of the grass Danthonia spicata from 1981 to 1985. The populations were in sites in a Pinus-Quercus-Populus forest in northern lower Michigan, USA comprising a secondary succession sequence. The sites had been burned in 1980, 1954, 1948, 1936, and 1911, respectively. Mean sizes and fecundities and the amount of hierarchy in size and fecundity, measured by the Gini coefficient, were compared between the YOUNG population, 1980 burn site, and the OLD populations, 1954, 1948, 1936, and 1911 burn sites. I found large differences in mean size and fecundity between the YOUNG and OLD populations with much larger individuals in the YOUNG population. No differences in size hierarchies were found in either the first year of measurement or after five years. The fecundity hierarchies showed no significant difference among the populations in the first year but after five years the YOUNG population showed a significant decrease in amount of inequality. The long-term patterns of size and fecundity hierarchies differed because fecundity was a cumulative trait while size was not. Size inequalities may not always be a good measure of fecundity inequalities. Short-term measures of inequality in perennials may not be a good indicator of long-term values. In contrast to greenhouse studies, habitat light levels did not affect size hierarchies although they did affect fecundity hierarchies.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0029-8549</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1432-1939</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/BF00377356</identifier><identifier>PMID: 28310425</identifier><identifier>CODEN: OECOBX</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Berlin: Springer-Verlag</publisher><subject>Animal and plant ecology ; Animal, plant and microbial ecology ; Biological and medical sciences ; Danthonia spicata ; Demecology ; Ecological competition ; Fecundity ; Forest succession ; Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology ; Gini coefficient ; Habitats ; perennials ; Plants ; Plants and fungi ; Population distributions ; Population ecology ; Population mean ; Population size ; size</subject><ispartof>Oecologia, 1987-11, Vol.74 (1), p.128-132</ispartof><rights>Copyright 1987 Springer-Verlag</rights><rights>1988 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c390t-bf3c5366e4436349a97774b66dde5825bd8c9d8b6f71dc903865ff8fb8d737213</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c390t-bf3c5366e4436349a97774b66dde5825bd8c9d8b6f71dc903865ff8fb8d737213</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/4218441$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/4218441$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,803,27924,27925,58017,58250</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=7731665$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28310425$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Scheiner, S.M</creatorcontrib><title>Size and fecundity hierarchies in an herbaceous perennial</title><title>Oecologia</title><addtitle>Oecologia</addtitle><description>Inequalities in size in populations have potentially important effects on fitness but have rarely been examined in natural populations. I measured size (number of culms) and fecundity (number of spikelets) in five populations of the grass Danthonia spicata from 1981 to 1985. The populations were in sites in a Pinus-Quercus-Populus forest in northern lower Michigan, USA comprising a secondary succession sequence. The sites had been burned in 1980, 1954, 1948, 1936, and 1911, respectively. Mean sizes and fecundities and the amount of hierarchy in size and fecundity, measured by the Gini coefficient, were compared between the YOUNG population, 1980 burn site, and the OLD populations, 1954, 1948, 1936, and 1911 burn sites. I found large differences in mean size and fecundity between the YOUNG and OLD populations with much larger individuals in the YOUNG population. No differences in size hierarchies were found in either the first year of measurement or after five years. The fecundity hierarchies showed no significant difference among the populations in the first year but after five years the YOUNG population showed a significant decrease in amount of inequality. The long-term patterns of size and fecundity hierarchies differed because fecundity was a cumulative trait while size was not. Size inequalities may not always be a good measure of fecundity inequalities. Short-term measures of inequality in perennials may not be a good indicator of long-term values. In contrast to greenhouse studies, habitat light levels did not affect size hierarchies although they did affect fecundity hierarchies.</description><subject>Animal and plant ecology</subject><subject>Animal, plant and microbial ecology</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Danthonia spicata</subject><subject>Demecology</subject><subject>Ecological competition</subject><subject>Fecundity</subject><subject>Forest succession</subject><subject>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</subject><subject>Gini coefficient</subject><subject>Habitats</subject><subject>perennials</subject><subject>Plants</subject><subject>Plants and fungi</subject><subject>Population distributions</subject><subject>Population ecology</subject><subject>Population mean</subject><subject>Population size</subject><subject>size</subject><issn>0029-8549</issn><issn>1432-1939</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1987</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp90L1LAzEYBvAgiq3VxVn0BhERTt98J6OKVUFwUOcjlw-9cr2rSTvoX29Ka92c3uH58ZA8CB1iuMQA8upmDEClpFxsoSFmlJRYU72NhgBEl4ozPUB7KU0AMMOc76IBURQDI3yI9Evz7QvTuSJ4u-hcM_8qPhofTbT5pKLpclh8-Fgb6_tFKmY--q5rTLuPdoJpkz9Y3xF6G9-93j6UT8_3j7fXT6WlGuZlHajlVAjPGBWUaaOllKwWwjnPFeG1U1Y7VYsgsbMaqBI8BBVq5SSVBNMROl_1zmL_ufBpXk2bZH3bmm75oAorqRTRWWZ69j9ligEVJMOLFbSxTyn6UM1iMzXxq8JQLTet_jbN-Hjduqin3m3o74gZnK6BSda0IZrONmnjcgsWYsmOVmyS5n3cxIxgxdjynyerOJi-Mu8xN7y9EMAUCAgFTNIf1mWOFw</recordid><startdate>19871101</startdate><enddate>19871101</enddate><creator>Scheiner, S.M</creator><general>Springer-Verlag</general><general>Springer</general><scope>FBQ</scope><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>19871101</creationdate><title>Size and fecundity hierarchies in an herbaceous perennial</title><author>Scheiner, S.M</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c390t-bf3c5366e4436349a97774b66dde5825bd8c9d8b6f71dc903865ff8fb8d737213</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1987</creationdate><topic>Animal and plant ecology</topic><topic>Animal, plant and microbial ecology</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Danthonia spicata</topic><topic>Demecology</topic><topic>Ecological competition</topic><topic>Fecundity</topic><topic>Forest succession</topic><topic>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</topic><topic>Gini coefficient</topic><topic>Habitats</topic><topic>perennials</topic><topic>Plants</topic><topic>Plants and fungi</topic><topic>Population distributions</topic><topic>Population ecology</topic><topic>Population mean</topic><topic>Population size</topic><topic>size</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Scheiner, S.M</creatorcontrib><collection>AGRIS</collection><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Oecologia</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Scheiner, S.M</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Size and fecundity hierarchies in an herbaceous perennial</atitle><jtitle>Oecologia</jtitle><addtitle>Oecologia</addtitle><date>1987-11-01</date><risdate>1987</risdate><volume>74</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>128</spage><epage>132</epage><pages>128-132</pages><issn>0029-8549</issn><eissn>1432-1939</eissn><coden>OECOBX</coden><abstract>Inequalities in size in populations have potentially important effects on fitness but have rarely been examined in natural populations. I measured size (number of culms) and fecundity (number of spikelets) in five populations of the grass Danthonia spicata from 1981 to 1985. The populations were in sites in a Pinus-Quercus-Populus forest in northern lower Michigan, USA comprising a secondary succession sequence. The sites had been burned in 1980, 1954, 1948, 1936, and 1911, respectively. Mean sizes and fecundities and the amount of hierarchy in size and fecundity, measured by the Gini coefficient, were compared between the YOUNG population, 1980 burn site, and the OLD populations, 1954, 1948, 1936, and 1911 burn sites. I found large differences in mean size and fecundity between the YOUNG and OLD populations with much larger individuals in the YOUNG population. No differences in size hierarchies were found in either the first year of measurement or after five years. The fecundity hierarchies showed no significant difference among the populations in the first year but after five years the YOUNG population showed a significant decrease in amount of inequality. The long-term patterns of size and fecundity hierarchies differed because fecundity was a cumulative trait while size was not. Size inequalities may not always be a good measure of fecundity inequalities. Short-term measures of inequality in perennials may not be a good indicator of long-term values. In contrast to greenhouse studies, habitat light levels did not affect size hierarchies although they did affect fecundity hierarchies.</abstract><cop>Berlin</cop><pub>Springer-Verlag</pub><pmid>28310425</pmid><doi>10.1007/BF00377356</doi><tpages>5</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0029-8549 |
ispartof | Oecologia, 1987-11, Vol.74 (1), p.128-132 |
issn | 0029-8549 1432-1939 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1878829213 |
source | SpringerNature Journals; JSTOR Archive Collection A-Z Listing |
subjects | Animal and plant ecology Animal, plant and microbial ecology Biological and medical sciences Danthonia spicata Demecology Ecological competition Fecundity Forest succession Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology Gini coefficient Habitats perennials Plants Plants and fungi Population distributions Population ecology Population mean Population size size |
title | Size and fecundity hierarchies in an herbaceous perennial |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-04T05%3A48%3A41IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Size%20and%20fecundity%20hierarchies%20in%20an%20herbaceous%20perennial&rft.jtitle=Oecologia&rft.au=Scheiner,%20S.M&rft.date=1987-11-01&rft.volume=74&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=128&rft.epage=132&rft.pages=128-132&rft.issn=0029-8549&rft.eissn=1432-1939&rft.coden=OECOBX&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/BF00377356&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_proqu%3E4218441%3C/jstor_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=14840362&rft_id=info:pmid/28310425&rft_jstor_id=4218441&rfr_iscdi=true |