Dual-cutoff of sFlt-1/PlGF ratio in the stratification of preeclampsia: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Purpose To systematically review the approach of using two independent sFlt-1/PlGF cutoffs that has better sensitivity (cutoff-sen) and specificity (cutoff-spe) separately for risk stratification in the detection of preeclampsia. Methods PubMed and Embase databases and reference lists were searched...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Archives of gynecology and obstetrics 2017-05, Vol.295 (5), p.1079-1087
Hauptverfasser: Zhao, Mutong, Zhu, Zhiqing, Liu, Chongdong, Zhang, Zhenyu
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 1087
container_issue 5
container_start_page 1079
container_title Archives of gynecology and obstetrics
container_volume 295
creator Zhao, Mutong
Zhu, Zhiqing
Liu, Chongdong
Zhang, Zhenyu
description Purpose To systematically review the approach of using two independent sFlt-1/PlGF cutoffs that has better sensitivity (cutoff-sen) and specificity (cutoff-spe) separately for risk stratification in the detection of preeclampsia. Methods PubMed and Embase databases and reference lists were searched up to June 2016. Inclusion criteria were blood samples for sFlt-1/PlGF with separate cutoffs (cutoff-sen and cutoff-spe) provided. Six relevant studies were identified. Pooling of results was done based on three studies and a systematic review was performed based on all six. Results The strategy of using a cutoff of ≤33 and ≥85 for early onset preeclampsia, and ≤33 and ≥110 for the late onset preeclampsia was proposed and examined. The pooled sensitivity for cutoff-sen was: 95.3% (90.6–98.1%) and 88.6% (82.9–92.9%) for early and late onset preeclampsia, respectively. The pooled specificity for cutoff-spe was: 97.6% (95.2–98.9%) and 94.2% (91.4–96.3%) for early and late onset preeclampsia respectively. The pooled estimation of the early onset pre-eclamptic pregnancies and control normal pregnancies classified in the equivocal zone was 4.9% (2.0–8.8%) and 32.4% (25.7–39.5%), respectively, and 26.8% (10.3–47.6%) and 8.7% (3.0–17.6%) for late onset patients. Conclusion The new dual-cutoff diagnostic system optimizes the predictive performance of the single cutoff system. Further studies are required to assess the performance of this system and to define the approach and frequency at which subjects in the equivocal zone should be screened.
doi_str_mv 10.1007/s00404-017-4302-3
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1878818896</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2261519780</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c372t-4b7dc67a57a186a40d6c60703a37e321282cbba6db67fb3c78e4a9d8ff140ed53</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kU1vFDEMhiNERbeFH8AFReLCJdT52CTDDRW2VKpUDnCOMpkEppqPJc4U7b8no21BQurJsf34dZKXkNcc3nMAc4EAChQDbpiSIJh8RjZcScHAcP6cbKBZz6DNKTlDvAPgwlr9gpwKK7lqrNyQ8dPiBxaWMqdE50RxNxTGL74OVzuafeln2k-0_IwUy5qmPqzFaUX3OcYw-HGPvf9APcUDljjWdqA53vfxN_VTR8dYPPOTHw7Y40tykvyA8dVDPCffd5-_XX5hN7dX15cfb1iQRhSmWtMFbfzWeG61V9DpoMGA9NJEKeorRGhbr7tWm9TKYGxUvulsSlxB7LbynLw76u7z_GuJWNzYY4jD4Kc4L-i4NdZyaxtd0bf_oXfzkut90Qmh-ZY3xkKl-JEKeUbMMbl97kefD46DW71wRy9c9cKtXjhZZ948KC_tGLu_E4-fXwFxBLC2ph8x_1v9tOofn_WT0w</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2261519780</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Dual-cutoff of sFlt-1/PlGF ratio in the stratification of preeclampsia: a systematic review and meta-analysis</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Springer Nature - Complete Springer Journals</source><creator>Zhao, Mutong ; Zhu, Zhiqing ; Liu, Chongdong ; Zhang, Zhenyu</creator><creatorcontrib>Zhao, Mutong ; Zhu, Zhiqing ; Liu, Chongdong ; Zhang, Zhenyu</creatorcontrib><description>Purpose To systematically review the approach of using two independent sFlt-1/PlGF cutoffs that has better sensitivity (cutoff-sen) and specificity (cutoff-spe) separately for risk stratification in the detection of preeclampsia. Methods PubMed and Embase databases and reference lists were searched up to June 2016. Inclusion criteria were blood samples for sFlt-1/PlGF with separate cutoffs (cutoff-sen and cutoff-spe) provided. Six relevant studies were identified. Pooling of results was done based on three studies and a systematic review was performed based on all six. Results The strategy of using a cutoff of ≤33 and ≥85 for early onset preeclampsia, and ≤33 and ≥110 for the late onset preeclampsia was proposed and examined. The pooled sensitivity for cutoff-sen was: 95.3% (90.6–98.1%) and 88.6% (82.9–92.9%) for early and late onset preeclampsia, respectively. The pooled specificity for cutoff-spe was: 97.6% (95.2–98.9%) and 94.2% (91.4–96.3%) for early and late onset preeclampsia respectively. The pooled estimation of the early onset pre-eclamptic pregnancies and control normal pregnancies classified in the equivocal zone was 4.9% (2.0–8.8%) and 32.4% (25.7–39.5%), respectively, and 26.8% (10.3–47.6%) and 8.7% (3.0–17.6%) for late onset patients. Conclusion The new dual-cutoff diagnostic system optimizes the predictive performance of the single cutoff system. Further studies are required to assess the performance of this system and to define the approach and frequency at which subjects in the equivocal zone should be screened.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0932-0067</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1432-0711</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s00404-017-4302-3</identifier><identifier>PMID: 28314983</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Berlin/Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg</publisher><subject>Adult ; Biomarkers - blood ; Endocrinology ; Female ; Gestational Age ; Gynecology ; Human Genetics ; Humans ; Medicine ; Medicine &amp; Public Health ; Meta-analysis ; Obstetrics/Perinatology/Midwifery ; Placenta Growth Factor - blood ; Pre-Eclampsia - blood ; Preeclampsia ; Pregnancy ; Pregnancy Proteins - blood ; Reference Values ; Review ; Sensitivity and Specificity ; Systematic review ; Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor Receptor-1 - blood</subject><ispartof>Archives of gynecology and obstetrics, 2017-05, Vol.295 (5), p.1079-1087</ispartof><rights>Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2017</rights><rights>Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics is a copyright of Springer, (2017). All Rights Reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c372t-4b7dc67a57a186a40d6c60703a37e321282cbba6db67fb3c78e4a9d8ff140ed53</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c372t-4b7dc67a57a186a40d6c60703a37e321282cbba6db67fb3c78e4a9d8ff140ed53</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s00404-017-4302-3$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1007/s00404-017-4302-3$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902,41464,42533,51294</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28314983$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Zhao, Mutong</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhu, Zhiqing</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Liu, Chongdong</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhang, Zhenyu</creatorcontrib><title>Dual-cutoff of sFlt-1/PlGF ratio in the stratification of preeclampsia: a systematic review and meta-analysis</title><title>Archives of gynecology and obstetrics</title><addtitle>Arch Gynecol Obstet</addtitle><addtitle>Arch Gynecol Obstet</addtitle><description>Purpose To systematically review the approach of using two independent sFlt-1/PlGF cutoffs that has better sensitivity (cutoff-sen) and specificity (cutoff-spe) separately for risk stratification in the detection of preeclampsia. Methods PubMed and Embase databases and reference lists were searched up to June 2016. Inclusion criteria were blood samples for sFlt-1/PlGF with separate cutoffs (cutoff-sen and cutoff-spe) provided. Six relevant studies were identified. Pooling of results was done based on three studies and a systematic review was performed based on all six. Results The strategy of using a cutoff of ≤33 and ≥85 for early onset preeclampsia, and ≤33 and ≥110 for the late onset preeclampsia was proposed and examined. The pooled sensitivity for cutoff-sen was: 95.3% (90.6–98.1%) and 88.6% (82.9–92.9%) for early and late onset preeclampsia, respectively. The pooled specificity for cutoff-spe was: 97.6% (95.2–98.9%) and 94.2% (91.4–96.3%) for early and late onset preeclampsia respectively. The pooled estimation of the early onset pre-eclamptic pregnancies and control normal pregnancies classified in the equivocal zone was 4.9% (2.0–8.8%) and 32.4% (25.7–39.5%), respectively, and 26.8% (10.3–47.6%) and 8.7% (3.0–17.6%) for late onset patients. Conclusion The new dual-cutoff diagnostic system optimizes the predictive performance of the single cutoff system. Further studies are required to assess the performance of this system and to define the approach and frequency at which subjects in the equivocal zone should be screened.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Biomarkers - blood</subject><subject>Endocrinology</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Gestational Age</subject><subject>Gynecology</subject><subject>Human Genetics</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Medicine</subject><subject>Medicine &amp; Public Health</subject><subject>Meta-analysis</subject><subject>Obstetrics/Perinatology/Midwifery</subject><subject>Placenta Growth Factor - blood</subject><subject>Pre-Eclampsia - blood</subject><subject>Preeclampsia</subject><subject>Pregnancy</subject><subject>Pregnancy Proteins - blood</subject><subject>Reference Values</subject><subject>Review</subject><subject>Sensitivity and Specificity</subject><subject>Systematic review</subject><subject>Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor Receptor-1 - blood</subject><issn>0932-0067</issn><issn>1432-0711</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2017</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kU1vFDEMhiNERbeFH8AFReLCJdT52CTDDRW2VKpUDnCOMpkEppqPJc4U7b8no21BQurJsf34dZKXkNcc3nMAc4EAChQDbpiSIJh8RjZcScHAcP6cbKBZz6DNKTlDvAPgwlr9gpwKK7lqrNyQ8dPiBxaWMqdE50RxNxTGL74OVzuafeln2k-0_IwUy5qmPqzFaUX3OcYw-HGPvf9APcUDljjWdqA53vfxN_VTR8dYPPOTHw7Y40tykvyA8dVDPCffd5-_XX5hN7dX15cfb1iQRhSmWtMFbfzWeG61V9DpoMGA9NJEKeorRGhbr7tWm9TKYGxUvulsSlxB7LbynLw76u7z_GuJWNzYY4jD4Kc4L-i4NdZyaxtd0bf_oXfzkut90Qmh-ZY3xkKl-JEKeUbMMbl97kefD46DW71wRy9c9cKtXjhZZ948KC_tGLu_E4-fXwFxBLC2ph8x_1v9tOofn_WT0w</recordid><startdate>20170501</startdate><enddate>20170501</enddate><creator>Zhao, Mutong</creator><creator>Zhu, Zhiqing</creator><creator>Liu, Chongdong</creator><creator>Zhang, Zhenyu</creator><general>Springer Berlin Heidelberg</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20170501</creationdate><title>Dual-cutoff of sFlt-1/PlGF ratio in the stratification of preeclampsia: a systematic review and meta-analysis</title><author>Zhao, Mutong ; Zhu, Zhiqing ; Liu, Chongdong ; Zhang, Zhenyu</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c372t-4b7dc67a57a186a40d6c60703a37e321282cbba6db67fb3c78e4a9d8ff140ed53</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2017</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Biomarkers - blood</topic><topic>Endocrinology</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Gestational Age</topic><topic>Gynecology</topic><topic>Human Genetics</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Medicine</topic><topic>Medicine &amp; Public Health</topic><topic>Meta-analysis</topic><topic>Obstetrics/Perinatology/Midwifery</topic><topic>Placenta Growth Factor - blood</topic><topic>Pre-Eclampsia - blood</topic><topic>Preeclampsia</topic><topic>Pregnancy</topic><topic>Pregnancy Proteins - blood</topic><topic>Reference Values</topic><topic>Review</topic><topic>Sensitivity and Specificity</topic><topic>Systematic review</topic><topic>Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor Receptor-1 - blood</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Zhao, Mutong</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhu, Zhiqing</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Liu, Chongdong</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhang, Zhenyu</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Archives of gynecology and obstetrics</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Zhao, Mutong</au><au>Zhu, Zhiqing</au><au>Liu, Chongdong</au><au>Zhang, Zhenyu</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Dual-cutoff of sFlt-1/PlGF ratio in the stratification of preeclampsia: a systematic review and meta-analysis</atitle><jtitle>Archives of gynecology and obstetrics</jtitle><stitle>Arch Gynecol Obstet</stitle><addtitle>Arch Gynecol Obstet</addtitle><date>2017-05-01</date><risdate>2017</risdate><volume>295</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>1079</spage><epage>1087</epage><pages>1079-1087</pages><issn>0932-0067</issn><eissn>1432-0711</eissn><abstract>Purpose To systematically review the approach of using two independent sFlt-1/PlGF cutoffs that has better sensitivity (cutoff-sen) and specificity (cutoff-spe) separately for risk stratification in the detection of preeclampsia. Methods PubMed and Embase databases and reference lists were searched up to June 2016. Inclusion criteria were blood samples for sFlt-1/PlGF with separate cutoffs (cutoff-sen and cutoff-spe) provided. Six relevant studies were identified. Pooling of results was done based on three studies and a systematic review was performed based on all six. Results The strategy of using a cutoff of ≤33 and ≥85 for early onset preeclampsia, and ≤33 and ≥110 for the late onset preeclampsia was proposed and examined. The pooled sensitivity for cutoff-sen was: 95.3% (90.6–98.1%) and 88.6% (82.9–92.9%) for early and late onset preeclampsia, respectively. The pooled specificity for cutoff-spe was: 97.6% (95.2–98.9%) and 94.2% (91.4–96.3%) for early and late onset preeclampsia respectively. The pooled estimation of the early onset pre-eclamptic pregnancies and control normal pregnancies classified in the equivocal zone was 4.9% (2.0–8.8%) and 32.4% (25.7–39.5%), respectively, and 26.8% (10.3–47.6%) and 8.7% (3.0–17.6%) for late onset patients. Conclusion The new dual-cutoff diagnostic system optimizes the predictive performance of the single cutoff system. Further studies are required to assess the performance of this system and to define the approach and frequency at which subjects in the equivocal zone should be screened.</abstract><cop>Berlin/Heidelberg</cop><pub>Springer Berlin Heidelberg</pub><pmid>28314983</pmid><doi>10.1007/s00404-017-4302-3</doi><tpages>9</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0932-0067
ispartof Archives of gynecology and obstetrics, 2017-05, Vol.295 (5), p.1079-1087
issn 0932-0067
1432-0711
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1878818896
source MEDLINE; Springer Nature - Complete Springer Journals
subjects Adult
Biomarkers - blood
Endocrinology
Female
Gestational Age
Gynecology
Human Genetics
Humans
Medicine
Medicine & Public Health
Meta-analysis
Obstetrics/Perinatology/Midwifery
Placenta Growth Factor - blood
Pre-Eclampsia - blood
Preeclampsia
Pregnancy
Pregnancy Proteins - blood
Reference Values
Review
Sensitivity and Specificity
Systematic review
Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor Receptor-1 - blood
title Dual-cutoff of sFlt-1/PlGF ratio in the stratification of preeclampsia: a systematic review and meta-analysis
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-09T22%3A20%3A29IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Dual-cutoff%20of%20sFlt-1/PlGF%20ratio%20in%20the%20stratification%20of%20preeclampsia:%20a%20systematic%20review%20and%20meta-analysis&rft.jtitle=Archives%20of%20gynecology%20and%20obstetrics&rft.au=Zhao,%20Mutong&rft.date=2017-05-01&rft.volume=295&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=1079&rft.epage=1087&rft.pages=1079-1087&rft.issn=0932-0067&rft.eissn=1432-0711&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s00404-017-4302-3&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2261519780%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2261519780&rft_id=info:pmid/28314983&rfr_iscdi=true