Dual-cutoff of sFlt-1/PlGF ratio in the stratification of preeclampsia: a systematic review and meta-analysis
Purpose To systematically review the approach of using two independent sFlt-1/PlGF cutoffs that has better sensitivity (cutoff-sen) and specificity (cutoff-spe) separately for risk stratification in the detection of preeclampsia. Methods PubMed and Embase databases and reference lists were searched...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Archives of gynecology and obstetrics 2017-05, Vol.295 (5), p.1079-1087 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 1087 |
---|---|
container_issue | 5 |
container_start_page | 1079 |
container_title | Archives of gynecology and obstetrics |
container_volume | 295 |
creator | Zhao, Mutong Zhu, Zhiqing Liu, Chongdong Zhang, Zhenyu |
description | Purpose
To systematically review the approach of using two independent sFlt-1/PlGF cutoffs that has better sensitivity (cutoff-sen) and specificity (cutoff-spe) separately for risk stratification in the detection of preeclampsia.
Methods
PubMed and Embase databases and reference lists were searched up to June 2016. Inclusion criteria were blood samples for sFlt-1/PlGF with separate cutoffs (cutoff-sen and cutoff-spe) provided. Six relevant studies were identified. Pooling of results was done based on three studies and a systematic review was performed based on all six.
Results
The strategy of using a cutoff of ≤33 and ≥85 for early onset preeclampsia, and ≤33 and ≥110 for the late onset preeclampsia was proposed and examined. The pooled sensitivity for cutoff-sen was: 95.3% (90.6–98.1%) and 88.6% (82.9–92.9%) for early and late onset preeclampsia, respectively. The pooled specificity for cutoff-spe was: 97.6% (95.2–98.9%) and 94.2% (91.4–96.3%) for early and late onset preeclampsia respectively. The pooled estimation of the early onset pre-eclamptic pregnancies and control normal pregnancies classified in the equivocal zone was 4.9% (2.0–8.8%) and 32.4% (25.7–39.5%), respectively, and 26.8% (10.3–47.6%) and 8.7% (3.0–17.6%) for late onset patients.
Conclusion
The new dual-cutoff diagnostic system optimizes the predictive performance of the single cutoff system. Further studies are required to assess the performance of this system and to define the approach and frequency at which subjects in the equivocal zone should be screened. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1007/s00404-017-4302-3 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1878818896</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2261519780</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c372t-4b7dc67a57a186a40d6c60703a37e321282cbba6db67fb3c78e4a9d8ff140ed53</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kU1vFDEMhiNERbeFH8AFReLCJdT52CTDDRW2VKpUDnCOMpkEppqPJc4U7b8no21BQurJsf34dZKXkNcc3nMAc4EAChQDbpiSIJh8RjZcScHAcP6cbKBZz6DNKTlDvAPgwlr9gpwKK7lqrNyQ8dPiBxaWMqdE50RxNxTGL74OVzuafeln2k-0_IwUy5qmPqzFaUX3OcYw-HGPvf9APcUDljjWdqA53vfxN_VTR8dYPPOTHw7Y40tykvyA8dVDPCffd5-_XX5hN7dX15cfb1iQRhSmWtMFbfzWeG61V9DpoMGA9NJEKeorRGhbr7tWm9TKYGxUvulsSlxB7LbynLw76u7z_GuJWNzYY4jD4Kc4L-i4NdZyaxtd0bf_oXfzkut90Qmh-ZY3xkKl-JEKeUbMMbl97kefD46DW71wRy9c9cKtXjhZZ948KC_tGLu_E4-fXwFxBLC2ph8x_1v9tOofn_WT0w</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2261519780</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Dual-cutoff of sFlt-1/PlGF ratio in the stratification of preeclampsia: a systematic review and meta-analysis</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Springer Nature - Complete Springer Journals</source><creator>Zhao, Mutong ; Zhu, Zhiqing ; Liu, Chongdong ; Zhang, Zhenyu</creator><creatorcontrib>Zhao, Mutong ; Zhu, Zhiqing ; Liu, Chongdong ; Zhang, Zhenyu</creatorcontrib><description>Purpose
To systematically review the approach of using two independent sFlt-1/PlGF cutoffs that has better sensitivity (cutoff-sen) and specificity (cutoff-spe) separately for risk stratification in the detection of preeclampsia.
Methods
PubMed and Embase databases and reference lists were searched up to June 2016. Inclusion criteria were blood samples for sFlt-1/PlGF with separate cutoffs (cutoff-sen and cutoff-spe) provided. Six relevant studies were identified. Pooling of results was done based on three studies and a systematic review was performed based on all six.
Results
The strategy of using a cutoff of ≤33 and ≥85 for early onset preeclampsia, and ≤33 and ≥110 for the late onset preeclampsia was proposed and examined. The pooled sensitivity for cutoff-sen was: 95.3% (90.6–98.1%) and 88.6% (82.9–92.9%) for early and late onset preeclampsia, respectively. The pooled specificity for cutoff-spe was: 97.6% (95.2–98.9%) and 94.2% (91.4–96.3%) for early and late onset preeclampsia respectively. The pooled estimation of the early onset pre-eclamptic pregnancies and control normal pregnancies classified in the equivocal zone was 4.9% (2.0–8.8%) and 32.4% (25.7–39.5%), respectively, and 26.8% (10.3–47.6%) and 8.7% (3.0–17.6%) for late onset patients.
Conclusion
The new dual-cutoff diagnostic system optimizes the predictive performance of the single cutoff system. Further studies are required to assess the performance of this system and to define the approach and frequency at which subjects in the equivocal zone should be screened.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0932-0067</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1432-0711</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s00404-017-4302-3</identifier><identifier>PMID: 28314983</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Berlin/Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg</publisher><subject>Adult ; Biomarkers - blood ; Endocrinology ; Female ; Gestational Age ; Gynecology ; Human Genetics ; Humans ; Medicine ; Medicine & Public Health ; Meta-analysis ; Obstetrics/Perinatology/Midwifery ; Placenta Growth Factor - blood ; Pre-Eclampsia - blood ; Preeclampsia ; Pregnancy ; Pregnancy Proteins - blood ; Reference Values ; Review ; Sensitivity and Specificity ; Systematic review ; Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor Receptor-1 - blood</subject><ispartof>Archives of gynecology and obstetrics, 2017-05, Vol.295 (5), p.1079-1087</ispartof><rights>Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2017</rights><rights>Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics is a copyright of Springer, (2017). All Rights Reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c372t-4b7dc67a57a186a40d6c60703a37e321282cbba6db67fb3c78e4a9d8ff140ed53</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c372t-4b7dc67a57a186a40d6c60703a37e321282cbba6db67fb3c78e4a9d8ff140ed53</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s00404-017-4302-3$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1007/s00404-017-4302-3$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902,41464,42533,51294</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28314983$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Zhao, Mutong</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhu, Zhiqing</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Liu, Chongdong</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhang, Zhenyu</creatorcontrib><title>Dual-cutoff of sFlt-1/PlGF ratio in the stratification of preeclampsia: a systematic review and meta-analysis</title><title>Archives of gynecology and obstetrics</title><addtitle>Arch Gynecol Obstet</addtitle><addtitle>Arch Gynecol Obstet</addtitle><description>Purpose
To systematically review the approach of using two independent sFlt-1/PlGF cutoffs that has better sensitivity (cutoff-sen) and specificity (cutoff-spe) separately for risk stratification in the detection of preeclampsia.
Methods
PubMed and Embase databases and reference lists were searched up to June 2016. Inclusion criteria were blood samples for sFlt-1/PlGF with separate cutoffs (cutoff-sen and cutoff-spe) provided. Six relevant studies were identified. Pooling of results was done based on three studies and a systematic review was performed based on all six.
Results
The strategy of using a cutoff of ≤33 and ≥85 for early onset preeclampsia, and ≤33 and ≥110 for the late onset preeclampsia was proposed and examined. The pooled sensitivity for cutoff-sen was: 95.3% (90.6–98.1%) and 88.6% (82.9–92.9%) for early and late onset preeclampsia, respectively. The pooled specificity for cutoff-spe was: 97.6% (95.2–98.9%) and 94.2% (91.4–96.3%) for early and late onset preeclampsia respectively. The pooled estimation of the early onset pre-eclamptic pregnancies and control normal pregnancies classified in the equivocal zone was 4.9% (2.0–8.8%) and 32.4% (25.7–39.5%), respectively, and 26.8% (10.3–47.6%) and 8.7% (3.0–17.6%) for late onset patients.
Conclusion
The new dual-cutoff diagnostic system optimizes the predictive performance of the single cutoff system. Further studies are required to assess the performance of this system and to define the approach and frequency at which subjects in the equivocal zone should be screened.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Biomarkers - blood</subject><subject>Endocrinology</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Gestational Age</subject><subject>Gynecology</subject><subject>Human Genetics</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Medicine</subject><subject>Medicine & Public Health</subject><subject>Meta-analysis</subject><subject>Obstetrics/Perinatology/Midwifery</subject><subject>Placenta Growth Factor - blood</subject><subject>Pre-Eclampsia - blood</subject><subject>Preeclampsia</subject><subject>Pregnancy</subject><subject>Pregnancy Proteins - blood</subject><subject>Reference Values</subject><subject>Review</subject><subject>Sensitivity and Specificity</subject><subject>Systematic review</subject><subject>Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor Receptor-1 - blood</subject><issn>0932-0067</issn><issn>1432-0711</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2017</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kU1vFDEMhiNERbeFH8AFReLCJdT52CTDDRW2VKpUDnCOMpkEppqPJc4U7b8no21BQurJsf34dZKXkNcc3nMAc4EAChQDbpiSIJh8RjZcScHAcP6cbKBZz6DNKTlDvAPgwlr9gpwKK7lqrNyQ8dPiBxaWMqdE50RxNxTGL74OVzuafeln2k-0_IwUy5qmPqzFaUX3OcYw-HGPvf9APcUDljjWdqA53vfxN_VTR8dYPPOTHw7Y40tykvyA8dVDPCffd5-_XX5hN7dX15cfb1iQRhSmWtMFbfzWeG61V9DpoMGA9NJEKeorRGhbr7tWm9TKYGxUvulsSlxB7LbynLw76u7z_GuJWNzYY4jD4Kc4L-i4NdZyaxtd0bf_oXfzkut90Qmh-ZY3xkKl-JEKeUbMMbl97kefD46DW71wRy9c9cKtXjhZZ948KC_tGLu_E4-fXwFxBLC2ph8x_1v9tOofn_WT0w</recordid><startdate>20170501</startdate><enddate>20170501</enddate><creator>Zhao, Mutong</creator><creator>Zhu, Zhiqing</creator><creator>Liu, Chongdong</creator><creator>Zhang, Zhenyu</creator><general>Springer Berlin Heidelberg</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20170501</creationdate><title>Dual-cutoff of sFlt-1/PlGF ratio in the stratification of preeclampsia: a systematic review and meta-analysis</title><author>Zhao, Mutong ; Zhu, Zhiqing ; Liu, Chongdong ; Zhang, Zhenyu</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c372t-4b7dc67a57a186a40d6c60703a37e321282cbba6db67fb3c78e4a9d8ff140ed53</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2017</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Biomarkers - blood</topic><topic>Endocrinology</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Gestational Age</topic><topic>Gynecology</topic><topic>Human Genetics</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Medicine</topic><topic>Medicine & Public Health</topic><topic>Meta-analysis</topic><topic>Obstetrics/Perinatology/Midwifery</topic><topic>Placenta Growth Factor - blood</topic><topic>Pre-Eclampsia - blood</topic><topic>Preeclampsia</topic><topic>Pregnancy</topic><topic>Pregnancy Proteins - blood</topic><topic>Reference Values</topic><topic>Review</topic><topic>Sensitivity and Specificity</topic><topic>Systematic review</topic><topic>Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor Receptor-1 - blood</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Zhao, Mutong</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhu, Zhiqing</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Liu, Chongdong</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhang, Zhenyu</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Archives of gynecology and obstetrics</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Zhao, Mutong</au><au>Zhu, Zhiqing</au><au>Liu, Chongdong</au><au>Zhang, Zhenyu</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Dual-cutoff of sFlt-1/PlGF ratio in the stratification of preeclampsia: a systematic review and meta-analysis</atitle><jtitle>Archives of gynecology and obstetrics</jtitle><stitle>Arch Gynecol Obstet</stitle><addtitle>Arch Gynecol Obstet</addtitle><date>2017-05-01</date><risdate>2017</risdate><volume>295</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>1079</spage><epage>1087</epage><pages>1079-1087</pages><issn>0932-0067</issn><eissn>1432-0711</eissn><abstract>Purpose
To systematically review the approach of using two independent sFlt-1/PlGF cutoffs that has better sensitivity (cutoff-sen) and specificity (cutoff-spe) separately for risk stratification in the detection of preeclampsia.
Methods
PubMed and Embase databases and reference lists were searched up to June 2016. Inclusion criteria were blood samples for sFlt-1/PlGF with separate cutoffs (cutoff-sen and cutoff-spe) provided. Six relevant studies were identified. Pooling of results was done based on three studies and a systematic review was performed based on all six.
Results
The strategy of using a cutoff of ≤33 and ≥85 for early onset preeclampsia, and ≤33 and ≥110 for the late onset preeclampsia was proposed and examined. The pooled sensitivity for cutoff-sen was: 95.3% (90.6–98.1%) and 88.6% (82.9–92.9%) for early and late onset preeclampsia, respectively. The pooled specificity for cutoff-spe was: 97.6% (95.2–98.9%) and 94.2% (91.4–96.3%) for early and late onset preeclampsia respectively. The pooled estimation of the early onset pre-eclamptic pregnancies and control normal pregnancies classified in the equivocal zone was 4.9% (2.0–8.8%) and 32.4% (25.7–39.5%), respectively, and 26.8% (10.3–47.6%) and 8.7% (3.0–17.6%) for late onset patients.
Conclusion
The new dual-cutoff diagnostic system optimizes the predictive performance of the single cutoff system. Further studies are required to assess the performance of this system and to define the approach and frequency at which subjects in the equivocal zone should be screened.</abstract><cop>Berlin/Heidelberg</cop><pub>Springer Berlin Heidelberg</pub><pmid>28314983</pmid><doi>10.1007/s00404-017-4302-3</doi><tpages>9</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0932-0067 |
ispartof | Archives of gynecology and obstetrics, 2017-05, Vol.295 (5), p.1079-1087 |
issn | 0932-0067 1432-0711 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1878818896 |
source | MEDLINE; Springer Nature - Complete Springer Journals |
subjects | Adult Biomarkers - blood Endocrinology Female Gestational Age Gynecology Human Genetics Humans Medicine Medicine & Public Health Meta-analysis Obstetrics/Perinatology/Midwifery Placenta Growth Factor - blood Pre-Eclampsia - blood Preeclampsia Pregnancy Pregnancy Proteins - blood Reference Values Review Sensitivity and Specificity Systematic review Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor Receptor-1 - blood |
title | Dual-cutoff of sFlt-1/PlGF ratio in the stratification of preeclampsia: a systematic review and meta-analysis |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-09T22%3A20%3A29IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Dual-cutoff%20of%20sFlt-1/PlGF%20ratio%20in%20the%20stratification%20of%20preeclampsia:%20a%20systematic%20review%20and%20meta-analysis&rft.jtitle=Archives%20of%20gynecology%20and%20obstetrics&rft.au=Zhao,%20Mutong&rft.date=2017-05-01&rft.volume=295&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=1079&rft.epage=1087&rft.pages=1079-1087&rft.issn=0932-0067&rft.eissn=1432-0711&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s00404-017-4302-3&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2261519780%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2261519780&rft_id=info:pmid/28314983&rfr_iscdi=true |