MARRIAGE, ABORTION, AND COMING OUT
Over the past two decades, legal protections for lesbian, gay, and bisexual individuals have dramatically expanded. Simultaneously, meaningful access to reproductive choice for women has eroded. What accounts for the different trajectories of LGBTQ rights and reproductive rights? This Piece argues t...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | Columbia law review 2016-12, Vol.116 (8), p.126-151 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 151 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 8 |
| container_start_page | 126 |
| container_title | Columbia law review |
| container_volume | 116 |
| creator | Skinner-Thompson, Scott Law, Sylvia A Baran, Hugh |
| description | Over the past two decades, legal protections for lesbian, gay, and bisexual individuals have dramatically expanded. Simultaneously, meaningful access to reproductive choice for women has eroded. What accounts for the different trajectories of LGBTQ rights and reproductive rights? This Piece argues that one explanation-or at least partial explanation,-for the a,dvance of LGBTQ rights relative to reproductive rights is the differing degree to which individuals have come out about their experiences with sexuality compared to coming out about experiences with unplanned pregnancies. In particular, as catalogued in this Piece, popular media portrayals of lesbian and gay individuals have proliferated, broadening the social and judicial understanding of minority sexualities. Meanwhile, popular media portrayals of women confronting unplanned pregnancies remain relatively sparse and, when they do appear, are often inaccurate and unrepresentative. The correlation between positive media portrayals of lesbian and gay individuals and judicial recognition of protections for sexual minorities suggests that in order to halt the erosion of reproductive rights, it will be important to expose society to people exercising their right to abortion on the screen, in the office, and at the kitchen table. |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1878799117</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1878799117</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-p617-90986bff6c64c90e243802858973d3c91d9b34e465d98041ec76bd502e279c5c3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpdj01Lw0AYhBdRMFb_Q9CLBxf2e9_3GGONgTYLIZ5Ls9mAJTa1a_6_C3ryNDPwMMxckIyj0lQIA5ckY4wzylHDNbmJ8cBS1iAycr8t2rYuqvVTXjy7tqtdk1zzkpduWzdV7t67W3I17qcY7v50RbrXdVe-0Y2r6rLY0JPhliJDMP04Gm-URxaEksAEaEArB-mRD9hLFZTRAwJTPHhr-kEzEYRFr71ckcff2tN5_lpC_N59fkQfpml_DPMSdxwsWETObUIf_qGHeTkf07hEGalVeg7yBxEfQ6U</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1863541948</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>MARRIAGE, ABORTION, AND COMING OUT</title><source>PAIS Index</source><source>Business Source Complete</source><source>JSTOR Archive Collection A-Z Listing</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Skinner-Thompson, Scott ; Law, Sylvia A ; Baran, Hugh</creator><creatorcontrib>Skinner-Thompson, Scott ; Law, Sylvia A ; Baran, Hugh</creatorcontrib><description>Over the past two decades, legal protections for lesbian, gay, and bisexual individuals have dramatically expanded. Simultaneously, meaningful access to reproductive choice for women has eroded. What accounts for the different trajectories of LGBTQ rights and reproductive rights? This Piece argues that one explanation-or at least partial explanation,-for the a,dvance of LGBTQ rights relative to reproductive rights is the differing degree to which individuals have come out about their experiences with sexuality compared to coming out about experiences with unplanned pregnancies. In particular, as catalogued in this Piece, popular media portrayals of lesbian and gay individuals have proliferated, broadening the social and judicial understanding of minority sexualities. Meanwhile, popular media portrayals of women confronting unplanned pregnancies remain relatively sparse and, when they do appear, are often inaccurate and unrepresentative. The correlation between positive media portrayals of lesbian and gay individuals and judicial recognition of protections for sexual minorities suggests that in order to halt the erosion of reproductive rights, it will be important to expose society to people exercising their right to abortion on the screen, in the office, and at the kitchen table.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0010-1958</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1945-2268</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New York: Columbia Law Review Association, Inc</publisher><subject>Abortion ; Bisexuality ; Constitutional law ; Couples ; Equal rights ; Females ; Gays & lesbians ; LGBTQ people ; LGBTQ rights ; LGBTQ rights movements ; Marriage ; Mass media ; Mass media images ; Minority groups ; Popular culture ; Pregnancy ; Reproductive rights ; Same sex marriage ; Sexual minorities ; Sexuality ; State court decisions ; Supreme Court decisions ; United States ; Womens rights</subject><ispartof>Columbia law review, 2016-12, Vol.116 (8), p.126-151</ispartof><rights>Copyright Columbia Law Review Association, Inc. Dec 2016</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27865</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Skinner-Thompson, Scott</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Law, Sylvia A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Baran, Hugh</creatorcontrib><title>MARRIAGE, ABORTION, AND COMING OUT</title><title>Columbia law review</title><description>Over the past two decades, legal protections for lesbian, gay, and bisexual individuals have dramatically expanded. Simultaneously, meaningful access to reproductive choice for women has eroded. What accounts for the different trajectories of LGBTQ rights and reproductive rights? This Piece argues that one explanation-or at least partial explanation,-for the a,dvance of LGBTQ rights relative to reproductive rights is the differing degree to which individuals have come out about their experiences with sexuality compared to coming out about experiences with unplanned pregnancies. In particular, as catalogued in this Piece, popular media portrayals of lesbian and gay individuals have proliferated, broadening the social and judicial understanding of minority sexualities. Meanwhile, popular media portrayals of women confronting unplanned pregnancies remain relatively sparse and, when they do appear, are often inaccurate and unrepresentative. The correlation between positive media portrayals of lesbian and gay individuals and judicial recognition of protections for sexual minorities suggests that in order to halt the erosion of reproductive rights, it will be important to expose society to people exercising their right to abortion on the screen, in the office, and at the kitchen table.</description><subject>Abortion</subject><subject>Bisexuality</subject><subject>Constitutional law</subject><subject>Couples</subject><subject>Equal rights</subject><subject>Females</subject><subject>Gays & lesbians</subject><subject>LGBTQ people</subject><subject>LGBTQ rights</subject><subject>LGBTQ rights movements</subject><subject>Marriage</subject><subject>Mass media</subject><subject>Mass media images</subject><subject>Minority groups</subject><subject>Popular culture</subject><subject>Pregnancy</subject><subject>Reproductive rights</subject><subject>Same sex marriage</subject><subject>Sexual minorities</subject><subject>Sexuality</subject><subject>State court decisions</subject><subject>Supreme Court decisions</subject><subject>United States</subject><subject>Womens rights</subject><issn>0010-1958</issn><issn>1945-2268</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2016</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7TQ</sourceid><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNpdj01Lw0AYhBdRMFb_Q9CLBxf2e9_3GGONgTYLIZ5Ls9mAJTa1a_6_C3ryNDPwMMxckIyj0lQIA5ckY4wzylHDNbmJ8cBS1iAycr8t2rYuqvVTXjy7tqtdk1zzkpduWzdV7t67W3I17qcY7v50RbrXdVe-0Y2r6rLY0JPhliJDMP04Gm-URxaEksAEaEArB-mRD9hLFZTRAwJTPHhr-kEzEYRFr71ckcff2tN5_lpC_N59fkQfpml_DPMSdxwsWETObUIf_qGHeTkf07hEGalVeg7yBxEfQ6U</recordid><startdate>20161201</startdate><enddate>20161201</enddate><creator>Skinner-Thompson, Scott</creator><creator>Law, Sylvia A</creator><creator>Baran, Hugh</creator><general>Columbia Law Review Association, Inc</general><scope>0-V</scope><scope>0U~</scope><scope>1-H</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7TQ</scope><scope>7WY</scope><scope>7WZ</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>87Z</scope><scope>8AM</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8FL</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ALSLI</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BEZIV</scope><scope>BGRYB</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DHY</scope><scope>DON</scope><scope>DPSOV</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>FRNLG</scope><scope>F~G</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>JBE</scope><scope>K60</scope><scope>K6~</scope><scope>K7.</scope><scope>KC-</scope><scope>L.-</scope><scope>L.0</scope><scope>M0C</scope><scope>M0O</scope><scope>M2L</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>PQBIZ</scope><scope>PQBZA</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>Q9U</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20161201</creationdate><title>MARRIAGE, ABORTION, AND COMING OUT</title><author>Skinner-Thompson, Scott ; Law, Sylvia A ; Baran, Hugh</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-p617-90986bff6c64c90e243802858973d3c91d9b34e465d98041ec76bd502e279c5c3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2016</creationdate><topic>Abortion</topic><topic>Bisexuality</topic><topic>Constitutional law</topic><topic>Couples</topic><topic>Equal rights</topic><topic>Females</topic><topic>Gays & lesbians</topic><topic>LGBTQ people</topic><topic>LGBTQ rights</topic><topic>LGBTQ rights movements</topic><topic>Marriage</topic><topic>Mass media</topic><topic>Mass media images</topic><topic>Minority groups</topic><topic>Popular culture</topic><topic>Pregnancy</topic><topic>Reproductive rights</topic><topic>Same sex marriage</topic><topic>Sexual minorities</topic><topic>Sexuality</topic><topic>State court decisions</topic><topic>Supreme Court decisions</topic><topic>United States</topic><topic>Womens rights</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Skinner-Thompson, Scott</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Law, Sylvia A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Baran, Hugh</creatorcontrib><collection>ProQuest Social Sciences Premium Collection</collection><collection>Global News & ABI/Inform Professional</collection><collection>Trade PRO</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>PAIS Index</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (PDF only)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Criminal Justice Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Social Science Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection</collection><collection>Criminology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>PAIS International</collection><collection>PAIS International (Ovid)</collection><collection>Politics Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Criminal Justice (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Politics Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Advanced</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Standard</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global</collection><collection>Criminal Justice Database</collection><collection>Political Science Database</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><jtitle>Columbia law review</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Skinner-Thompson, Scott</au><au>Law, Sylvia A</au><au>Baran, Hugh</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>MARRIAGE, ABORTION, AND COMING OUT</atitle><jtitle>Columbia law review</jtitle><date>2016-12-01</date><risdate>2016</risdate><volume>116</volume><issue>8</issue><spage>126</spage><epage>151</epage><pages>126-151</pages><issn>0010-1958</issn><eissn>1945-2268</eissn><abstract>Over the past two decades, legal protections for lesbian, gay, and bisexual individuals have dramatically expanded. Simultaneously, meaningful access to reproductive choice for women has eroded. What accounts for the different trajectories of LGBTQ rights and reproductive rights? This Piece argues that one explanation-or at least partial explanation,-for the a,dvance of LGBTQ rights relative to reproductive rights is the differing degree to which individuals have come out about their experiences with sexuality compared to coming out about experiences with unplanned pregnancies. In particular, as catalogued in this Piece, popular media portrayals of lesbian and gay individuals have proliferated, broadening the social and judicial understanding of minority sexualities. Meanwhile, popular media portrayals of women confronting unplanned pregnancies remain relatively sparse and, when they do appear, are often inaccurate and unrepresentative. The correlation between positive media portrayals of lesbian and gay individuals and judicial recognition of protections for sexual minorities suggests that in order to halt the erosion of reproductive rights, it will be important to expose society to people exercising their right to abortion on the screen, in the office, and at the kitchen table.</abstract><cop>New York</cop><pub>Columbia Law Review Association, Inc</pub><tpages>26</tpages></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 0010-1958 |
| ispartof | Columbia law review, 2016-12, Vol.116 (8), p.126-151 |
| issn | 0010-1958 1945-2268 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1878799117 |
| source | PAIS Index; Business Source Complete; JSTOR Archive Collection A-Z Listing; Alma/SFX Local Collection |
| subjects | Abortion Bisexuality Constitutional law Couples Equal rights Females Gays & lesbians LGBTQ people LGBTQ rights LGBTQ rights movements Marriage Mass media Mass media images Minority groups Popular culture Pregnancy Reproductive rights Same sex marriage Sexual minorities Sexuality State court decisions Supreme Court decisions United States Womens rights |
| title | MARRIAGE, ABORTION, AND COMING OUT |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-08T20%3A03%3A35IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=MARRIAGE,%20ABORTION,%20AND%20COMING%20OUT&rft.jtitle=Columbia%20law%20review&rft.au=Skinner-Thompson,%20Scott&rft.date=2016-12-01&rft.volume=116&rft.issue=8&rft.spage=126&rft.epage=151&rft.pages=126-151&rft.issn=0010-1958&rft.eissn=1945-2268&rft_id=info:doi/&rft_dat=%3Cproquest%3E1878799117%3C/proquest%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1863541948&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |