A Comparison of Market Integration in Nineteenth-Century China and Japan
This paper performs a cointegration analysis using an Error Correction Model (ECM) on annual rice prices to measure and compare market integration in China and Japan during the nineteenth century. We find markets in Japan were more integrated than in China at both the regional and national levels du...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Australian economic history review 2016-11, Vol.56 (3), p.246-271 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 271 |
---|---|
container_issue | 3 |
container_start_page | 246 |
container_title | Australian economic history review |
container_volume | 56 |
creator | Yao, Ke Zheng, Xiao-Ping |
description | This paper performs a cointegration analysis using an Error Correction Model (ECM) on annual rice prices to measure and compare market integration in China and Japan during the nineteenth century. We find markets in Japan were more integrated than in China at both the regional and national levels during the period. Moreover, market integration in Japan improved during industrialisation. These findings support the view that a well‐integrated market is a cause as well as a result of economic growth. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1111/aehr.12109 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1878798317</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1878798317</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c5029-dbab81e78de80cb6b63494d739d41b4869c7b81796ede2680f93cb3cb2fe4d93</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp90E1LwzAcBvAgCs6Xi5-g4EWEatJkeTmOOt3GVJCBx5C2_7rMLZ1Ji-7bmzn14MEQEhJ-TwgPQmcEX5E4rg3M_RXJCFZ7qEcYF6lkjO-jHsaYpVKp7BAdhbCIR6o46aHRIMmb1dp4GxqXNHVyb_wrtMnYtfDiTWvjrXXJg3XQArh2nuZx7fwmyefWmcS4KpmYtXEn6KA2ywCn3_sxmt0OZ_konT7ejfPBNC37OFNpVZhCEhCyAonLghecMsUqQVXFSMEkV6WIQCgOFWRc4lrRsogzq4FVih6ji92za9-8dRBavbKhhOXSOGi6oIkUUihJiYj0_A9dNJ138XNRUUL6TDAa1eVOlb4JwUOt196ujN9ogvW2U73tVH91GjHZ4Xe7hM0_Ug-Go6efTLrL2NDCx28m1qy5oKKvnx_uNBtN2IRMbzSmn4z3hsk</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1831154743</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>A Comparison of Market Integration in Nineteenth-Century China and Japan</title><source>Access via Wiley Online Library</source><source>EBSCOhost Business Source Complete</source><creator>Yao, Ke ; Zheng, Xiao-Ping</creator><creatorcontrib>Yao, Ke ; Zheng, Xiao-Ping</creatorcontrib><description>This paper performs a cointegration analysis using an Error Correction Model (ECM) on annual rice prices to measure and compare market integration in China and Japan during the nineteenth century. We find markets in Japan were more integrated than in China at both the regional and national levels during the period. Moreover, market integration in Japan improved during industrialisation. These findings support the view that a well‐integrated market is a cause as well as a result of economic growth.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0004-8992</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1467-8446</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2832-157X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/aehr.12109</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Brisbane: Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><subject>China ; Cointegration analysis ; Commodity prices ; ECM ; Economic conditions ; Economic growth ; Economic history ; Japan ; market integration ; Rice ; rice price ; Studies</subject><ispartof>Australian economic history review, 2016-11, Vol.56 (3), p.246-271</ispartof><rights>2016 Economic History Society of Australia and New Zealand and John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c5029-dbab81e78de80cb6b63494d739d41b4869c7b81796ede2680f93cb3cb2fe4d93</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c5029-dbab81e78de80cb6b63494d739d41b4869c7b81796ede2680f93cb3cb2fe4d93</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111%2Faehr.12109$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111%2Faehr.12109$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,1417,27924,27925,45574,45575</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Yao, Ke</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zheng, Xiao-Ping</creatorcontrib><title>A Comparison of Market Integration in Nineteenth-Century China and Japan</title><title>Australian economic history review</title><addtitle>Australian Economic History Review</addtitle><description>This paper performs a cointegration analysis using an Error Correction Model (ECM) on annual rice prices to measure and compare market integration in China and Japan during the nineteenth century. We find markets in Japan were more integrated than in China at both the regional and national levels during the period. Moreover, market integration in Japan improved during industrialisation. These findings support the view that a well‐integrated market is a cause as well as a result of economic growth.</description><subject>China</subject><subject>Cointegration analysis</subject><subject>Commodity prices</subject><subject>ECM</subject><subject>Economic conditions</subject><subject>Economic growth</subject><subject>Economic history</subject><subject>Japan</subject><subject>market integration</subject><subject>Rice</subject><subject>rice price</subject><subject>Studies</subject><issn>0004-8992</issn><issn>1467-8446</issn><issn>2832-157X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2016</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp90E1LwzAcBvAgCs6Xi5-g4EWEatJkeTmOOt3GVJCBx5C2_7rMLZ1Ji-7bmzn14MEQEhJ-TwgPQmcEX5E4rg3M_RXJCFZ7qEcYF6lkjO-jHsaYpVKp7BAdhbCIR6o46aHRIMmb1dp4GxqXNHVyb_wrtMnYtfDiTWvjrXXJg3XQArh2nuZx7fwmyefWmcS4KpmYtXEn6KA2ywCn3_sxmt0OZ_konT7ejfPBNC37OFNpVZhCEhCyAonLghecMsUqQVXFSMEkV6WIQCgOFWRc4lrRsogzq4FVih6ji92za9-8dRBavbKhhOXSOGi6oIkUUihJiYj0_A9dNJ138XNRUUL6TDAa1eVOlb4JwUOt196ujN9ogvW2U73tVH91GjHZ4Xe7hM0_Ug-Go6efTLrL2NDCx28m1qy5oKKvnx_uNBtN2IRMbzSmn4z3hsk</recordid><startdate>201611</startdate><enddate>201611</enddate><creator>Yao, Ke</creator><creator>Zheng, Xiao-Ping</creator><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>JBE</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201611</creationdate><title>A Comparison of Market Integration in Nineteenth-Century China and Japan</title><author>Yao, Ke ; Zheng, Xiao-Ping</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c5029-dbab81e78de80cb6b63494d739d41b4869c7b81796ede2680f93cb3cb2fe4d93</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2016</creationdate><topic>China</topic><topic>Cointegration analysis</topic><topic>Commodity prices</topic><topic>ECM</topic><topic>Economic conditions</topic><topic>Economic growth</topic><topic>Economic history</topic><topic>Japan</topic><topic>market integration</topic><topic>Rice</topic><topic>rice price</topic><topic>Studies</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Yao, Ke</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zheng, Xiao-Ping</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><jtitle>Australian economic history review</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Yao, Ke</au><au>Zheng, Xiao-Ping</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>A Comparison of Market Integration in Nineteenth-Century China and Japan</atitle><jtitle>Australian economic history review</jtitle><addtitle>Australian Economic History Review</addtitle><date>2016-11</date><risdate>2016</risdate><volume>56</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>246</spage><epage>271</epage><pages>246-271</pages><issn>0004-8992</issn><eissn>1467-8446</eissn><eissn>2832-157X</eissn><abstract>This paper performs a cointegration analysis using an Error Correction Model (ECM) on annual rice prices to measure and compare market integration in China and Japan during the nineteenth century. We find markets in Japan were more integrated than in China at both the regional and national levels during the period. Moreover, market integration in Japan improved during industrialisation. These findings support the view that a well‐integrated market is a cause as well as a result of economic growth.</abstract><cop>Brisbane</cop><pub>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</pub><doi>10.1111/aehr.12109</doi><tpages>26</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0004-8992 |
ispartof | Australian economic history review, 2016-11, Vol.56 (3), p.246-271 |
issn | 0004-8992 1467-8446 2832-157X |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1878798317 |
source | Access via Wiley Online Library; EBSCOhost Business Source Complete |
subjects | China Cointegration analysis Commodity prices ECM Economic conditions Economic growth Economic history Japan market integration Rice rice price Studies |
title | A Comparison of Market Integration in Nineteenth-Century China and Japan |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-24T17%3A26%3A11IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=A%20Comparison%20of%20Market%20Integration%20in%20Nineteenth-Century%20China%20and%20Japan&rft.jtitle=Australian%20economic%20history%20review&rft.au=Yao,%20Ke&rft.date=2016-11&rft.volume=56&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=246&rft.epage=271&rft.pages=246-271&rft.issn=0004-8992&rft.eissn=1467-8446&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/aehr.12109&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1878798317%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1831154743&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |