A Comparison of Market Integration in Nineteenth-Century China and Japan

This paper performs a cointegration analysis using an Error Correction Model (ECM) on annual rice prices to measure and compare market integration in China and Japan during the nineteenth century. We find markets in Japan were more integrated than in China at both the regional and national levels du...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Australian economic history review 2016-11, Vol.56 (3), p.246-271
Hauptverfasser: Yao, Ke, Zheng, Xiao-Ping
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 271
container_issue 3
container_start_page 246
container_title Australian economic history review
container_volume 56
creator Yao, Ke
Zheng, Xiao-Ping
description This paper performs a cointegration analysis using an Error Correction Model (ECM) on annual rice prices to measure and compare market integration in China and Japan during the nineteenth century. We find markets in Japan were more integrated than in China at both the regional and national levels during the period. Moreover, market integration in Japan improved during industrialisation. These findings support the view that a well‐integrated market is a cause as well as a result of economic growth.
doi_str_mv 10.1111/aehr.12109
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1878798317</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1878798317</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c5029-dbab81e78de80cb6b63494d739d41b4869c7b81796ede2680f93cb3cb2fe4d93</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp90E1LwzAcBvAgCs6Xi5-g4EWEatJkeTmOOt3GVJCBx5C2_7rMLZ1Ji-7bmzn14MEQEhJ-TwgPQmcEX5E4rg3M_RXJCFZ7qEcYF6lkjO-jHsaYpVKp7BAdhbCIR6o46aHRIMmb1dp4GxqXNHVyb_wrtMnYtfDiTWvjrXXJg3XQArh2nuZx7fwmyefWmcS4KpmYtXEn6KA2ywCn3_sxmt0OZ_konT7ejfPBNC37OFNpVZhCEhCyAonLghecMsUqQVXFSMEkV6WIQCgOFWRc4lrRsogzq4FVih6ji92za9-8dRBavbKhhOXSOGi6oIkUUihJiYj0_A9dNJ138XNRUUL6TDAa1eVOlb4JwUOt196ujN9ogvW2U73tVH91GjHZ4Xe7hM0_Ug-Go6efTLrL2NDCx28m1qy5oKKvnx_uNBtN2IRMbzSmn4z3hsk</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1831154743</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>A Comparison of Market Integration in Nineteenth-Century China and Japan</title><source>Access via Wiley Online Library</source><source>EBSCOhost Business Source Complete</source><creator>Yao, Ke ; Zheng, Xiao-Ping</creator><creatorcontrib>Yao, Ke ; Zheng, Xiao-Ping</creatorcontrib><description>This paper performs a cointegration analysis using an Error Correction Model (ECM) on annual rice prices to measure and compare market integration in China and Japan during the nineteenth century. We find markets in Japan were more integrated than in China at both the regional and national levels during the period. Moreover, market integration in Japan improved during industrialisation. These findings support the view that a well‐integrated market is a cause as well as a result of economic growth.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0004-8992</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1467-8446</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2832-157X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/aehr.12109</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Brisbane: Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><subject>China ; Cointegration analysis ; Commodity prices ; ECM ; Economic conditions ; Economic growth ; Economic history ; Japan ; market integration ; Rice ; rice price ; Studies</subject><ispartof>Australian economic history review, 2016-11, Vol.56 (3), p.246-271</ispartof><rights>2016 Economic History Society of Australia and New Zealand and John Wiley &amp; Sons Australia, Ltd</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c5029-dbab81e78de80cb6b63494d739d41b4869c7b81796ede2680f93cb3cb2fe4d93</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c5029-dbab81e78de80cb6b63494d739d41b4869c7b81796ede2680f93cb3cb2fe4d93</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111%2Faehr.12109$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111%2Faehr.12109$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,1417,27924,27925,45574,45575</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Yao, Ke</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zheng, Xiao-Ping</creatorcontrib><title>A Comparison of Market Integration in Nineteenth-Century China and Japan</title><title>Australian economic history review</title><addtitle>Australian Economic History Review</addtitle><description>This paper performs a cointegration analysis using an Error Correction Model (ECM) on annual rice prices to measure and compare market integration in China and Japan during the nineteenth century. We find markets in Japan were more integrated than in China at both the regional and national levels during the period. Moreover, market integration in Japan improved during industrialisation. These findings support the view that a well‐integrated market is a cause as well as a result of economic growth.</description><subject>China</subject><subject>Cointegration analysis</subject><subject>Commodity prices</subject><subject>ECM</subject><subject>Economic conditions</subject><subject>Economic growth</subject><subject>Economic history</subject><subject>Japan</subject><subject>market integration</subject><subject>Rice</subject><subject>rice price</subject><subject>Studies</subject><issn>0004-8992</issn><issn>1467-8446</issn><issn>2832-157X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2016</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp90E1LwzAcBvAgCs6Xi5-g4EWEatJkeTmOOt3GVJCBx5C2_7rMLZ1Ji-7bmzn14MEQEhJ-TwgPQmcEX5E4rg3M_RXJCFZ7qEcYF6lkjO-jHsaYpVKp7BAdhbCIR6o46aHRIMmb1dp4GxqXNHVyb_wrtMnYtfDiTWvjrXXJg3XQArh2nuZx7fwmyefWmcS4KpmYtXEn6KA2ywCn3_sxmt0OZ_konT7ejfPBNC37OFNpVZhCEhCyAonLghecMsUqQVXFSMEkV6WIQCgOFWRc4lrRsogzq4FVih6ji92za9-8dRBavbKhhOXSOGi6oIkUUihJiYj0_A9dNJ138XNRUUL6TDAa1eVOlb4JwUOt196ujN9ogvW2U73tVH91GjHZ4Xe7hM0_Ug-Go6efTLrL2NDCx28m1qy5oKKvnx_uNBtN2IRMbzSmn4z3hsk</recordid><startdate>201611</startdate><enddate>201611</enddate><creator>Yao, Ke</creator><creator>Zheng, Xiao-Ping</creator><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>JBE</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201611</creationdate><title>A Comparison of Market Integration in Nineteenth-Century China and Japan</title><author>Yao, Ke ; Zheng, Xiao-Ping</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c5029-dbab81e78de80cb6b63494d739d41b4869c7b81796ede2680f93cb3cb2fe4d93</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2016</creationdate><topic>China</topic><topic>Cointegration analysis</topic><topic>Commodity prices</topic><topic>ECM</topic><topic>Economic conditions</topic><topic>Economic growth</topic><topic>Economic history</topic><topic>Japan</topic><topic>market integration</topic><topic>Rice</topic><topic>rice price</topic><topic>Studies</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Yao, Ke</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zheng, Xiao-Ping</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><jtitle>Australian economic history review</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Yao, Ke</au><au>Zheng, Xiao-Ping</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>A Comparison of Market Integration in Nineteenth-Century China and Japan</atitle><jtitle>Australian economic history review</jtitle><addtitle>Australian Economic History Review</addtitle><date>2016-11</date><risdate>2016</risdate><volume>56</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>246</spage><epage>271</epage><pages>246-271</pages><issn>0004-8992</issn><eissn>1467-8446</eissn><eissn>2832-157X</eissn><abstract>This paper performs a cointegration analysis using an Error Correction Model (ECM) on annual rice prices to measure and compare market integration in China and Japan during the nineteenth century. We find markets in Japan were more integrated than in China at both the regional and national levels during the period. Moreover, market integration in Japan improved during industrialisation. These findings support the view that a well‐integrated market is a cause as well as a result of economic growth.</abstract><cop>Brisbane</cop><pub>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</pub><doi>10.1111/aehr.12109</doi><tpages>26</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0004-8992
ispartof Australian economic history review, 2016-11, Vol.56 (3), p.246-271
issn 0004-8992
1467-8446
2832-157X
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1878798317
source Access via Wiley Online Library; EBSCOhost Business Source Complete
subjects China
Cointegration analysis
Commodity prices
ECM
Economic conditions
Economic growth
Economic history
Japan
market integration
Rice
rice price
Studies
title A Comparison of Market Integration in Nineteenth-Century China and Japan
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-24T17%3A26%3A11IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=A%20Comparison%20of%20Market%20Integration%20in%20Nineteenth-Century%20China%20and%20Japan&rft.jtitle=Australian%20economic%20history%20review&rft.au=Yao,%20Ke&rft.date=2016-11&rft.volume=56&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=246&rft.epage=271&rft.pages=246-271&rft.issn=0004-8992&rft.eissn=1467-8446&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/aehr.12109&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1878798317%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1831154743&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true