Has Consumption Inequality Mirrored Income Inequality?
We revisit to what extent the increase in income inequality since 1980 was mirrored by consumption inequality. We do so by constructing an alternative measure of consumption expenditure using a demand system to correct for systematic measurement error in the Consumer Expenditure Survey. Our estimati...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | The American economic review 2015-09, Vol.105 (9), p.2725-2756 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 2756 |
---|---|
container_issue | 9 |
container_start_page | 2725 |
container_title | The American economic review |
container_volume | 105 |
creator | Aguiar, Mark Bils, Mark |
description | We revisit to what extent the increase in income inequality since 1980 was mirrored by consumption inequality. We do so by constructing an alternative measure of consumption expenditure using a demand system to correct for systematic measurement error in the Consumer Expenditure Survey. Our estimation exploits the relative expenditure of high- and low-income households on luxuries versus necessities. This double differencing corrects for measurement error that can vary over time by good and income. We find consumption inequality tracked income inequality much more closely than estimated by direct responses on expenditures. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1257/aer.20120599 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>jstor_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1878798153</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>43821356</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>43821356</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c486t-d864b59c22305c75dbbe6d034774a8c52c3b110d465e80406f36beaad78f07d23</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpd0M9LwzAUB_AgCs7pzasw8OLBzpff6UlkqBtMvOg5pEkKHW2zJe1h_70tVRFP4eV9eLz3RegawxITLh-Mj0sCmADP8xM0wzljmcwVPkUzACCZIoqco4uUdjDWWM6QWJu0WIU29c2-q0K72LT-0Ju66o6LtyrGEL0b_mxo_J_W4yU6K02d_NX3O0efL88fq3W2fX_drJ62mWVKdJlTghU8t4RQ4FZyVxReOKBMSmaU5cTSAmNwTHCvgIEoqSi8MU6qEqQjdI7uprn7GA69T51uqmR9XZvWhz5prKQaL-R0oLf_6C70sR2201hyyrmkSg7qflI2hpSiL_U-Vo2JR41BjyHqIUT9E-LAbya-S12Iv5ZRRTDlgn4BUiJspQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1753557387</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Has Consumption Inequality Mirrored Income Inequality?</title><source>EBSCOhost Business Source Complete</source><source>JSTOR Archive Collection A-Z Listing</source><source>American Economic Association</source><creator>Aguiar, Mark ; Bils, Mark</creator><creatorcontrib>Aguiar, Mark ; Bils, Mark</creatorcontrib><description>We revisit to what extent the increase in income inequality since 1980 was mirrored by consumption inequality. We do so by constructing an alternative measure of consumption expenditure using a demand system to correct for systematic measurement error in the Consumer Expenditure Survey. Our estimation exploits the relative expenditure of high- and low-income households on luxuries versus necessities. This double differencing corrects for measurement error that can vary over time by good and income. We find consumption inequality tracked income inequality much more closely than estimated by direct responses on expenditures.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0002-8282</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1944-7981</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1257/aer.20120599</identifier><identifier>CODEN: AENRAA</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Nashville: American Economic Association</publisher><subject>Bias ; Consumer economics ; Consumer spending ; Consumers ; Consumption ; Elasticity of demand ; Entertainment ; Estimates ; Expenditures ; Food ; High income ; Household consumption ; Households ; Income estimates ; Income inequality ; Income taxes ; Low income groups ; Relative prices ; Savings rates ; Total expenditures ; Trends</subject><ispartof>The American economic review, 2015-09, Vol.105 (9), p.2725-2756</ispartof><rights>Copyright© 2015 American Economic Association</rights><rights>Copyright American Economic Association Sep 2015</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c486t-d864b59c22305c75dbbe6d034774a8c52c3b110d465e80406f36beaad78f07d23</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c486t-d864b59c22305c75dbbe6d034774a8c52c3b110d465e80406f36beaad78f07d23</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/43821356$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/43821356$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>315,781,785,804,3749,27926,27927,58019,58252</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Aguiar, Mark</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bils, Mark</creatorcontrib><title>Has Consumption Inequality Mirrored Income Inequality?</title><title>The American economic review</title><description>We revisit to what extent the increase in income inequality since 1980 was mirrored by consumption inequality. We do so by constructing an alternative measure of consumption expenditure using a demand system to correct for systematic measurement error in the Consumer Expenditure Survey. Our estimation exploits the relative expenditure of high- and low-income households on luxuries versus necessities. This double differencing corrects for measurement error that can vary over time by good and income. We find consumption inequality tracked income inequality much more closely than estimated by direct responses on expenditures.</description><subject>Bias</subject><subject>Consumer economics</subject><subject>Consumer spending</subject><subject>Consumers</subject><subject>Consumption</subject><subject>Elasticity of demand</subject><subject>Entertainment</subject><subject>Estimates</subject><subject>Expenditures</subject><subject>Food</subject><subject>High income</subject><subject>Household consumption</subject><subject>Households</subject><subject>Income estimates</subject><subject>Income inequality</subject><subject>Income taxes</subject><subject>Low income groups</subject><subject>Relative prices</subject><subject>Savings rates</subject><subject>Total expenditures</subject><subject>Trends</subject><issn>0002-8282</issn><issn>1944-7981</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2015</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNpd0M9LwzAUB_AgCs7pzasw8OLBzpff6UlkqBtMvOg5pEkKHW2zJe1h_70tVRFP4eV9eLz3RegawxITLh-Mj0sCmADP8xM0wzljmcwVPkUzACCZIoqco4uUdjDWWM6QWJu0WIU29c2-q0K72LT-0Ju66o6LtyrGEL0b_mxo_J_W4yU6K02d_NX3O0efL88fq3W2fX_drJ62mWVKdJlTghU8t4RQ4FZyVxReOKBMSmaU5cTSAmNwTHCvgIEoqSi8MU6qEqQjdI7uprn7GA69T51uqmR9XZvWhz5prKQaL-R0oLf_6C70sR2201hyyrmkSg7qflI2hpSiL_U-Vo2JR41BjyHqIUT9E-LAbya-S12Iv5ZRRTDlgn4BUiJspQ</recordid><startdate>20150901</startdate><enddate>20150901</enddate><creator>Aguiar, Mark</creator><creator>Bils, Mark</creator><general>American Economic Association</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>0-V</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7WY</scope><scope>7WZ</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>87Z</scope><scope>88C</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>88J</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8FL</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ALSLI</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BEZIV</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>FRNLG</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>F~G</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>JBE</scope><scope>K60</scope><scope>K6~</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>L.-</scope><scope>M0C</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M0T</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>M2R</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>PQBIZ</scope><scope>PQBZA</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>Q9U</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20150901</creationdate><title>Has Consumption Inequality Mirrored Income Inequality?</title><author>Aguiar, Mark ; Bils, Mark</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c486t-d864b59c22305c75dbbe6d034774a8c52c3b110d465e80406f36beaad78f07d23</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2015</creationdate><topic>Bias</topic><topic>Consumer economics</topic><topic>Consumer spending</topic><topic>Consumers</topic><topic>Consumption</topic><topic>Elasticity of demand</topic><topic>Entertainment</topic><topic>Estimates</topic><topic>Expenditures</topic><topic>Food</topic><topic>High income</topic><topic>Household consumption</topic><topic>Households</topic><topic>Income estimates</topic><topic>Income inequality</topic><topic>Income taxes</topic><topic>Low income groups</topic><topic>Relative prices</topic><topic>Savings rates</topic><topic>Total expenditures</topic><topic>Trends</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Aguiar, Mark</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bils, Mark</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Social Sciences Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Access via ABI/INFORM (ProQuest)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (PDF only)</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Healthcare Administration Database (Alumni)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Social Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Social Science Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Corporate)</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Advanced</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Healthcare Administration Database</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Social Science Database</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><jtitle>The American economic review</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Aguiar, Mark</au><au>Bils, Mark</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Has Consumption Inequality Mirrored Income Inequality?</atitle><jtitle>The American economic review</jtitle><date>2015-09-01</date><risdate>2015</risdate><volume>105</volume><issue>9</issue><spage>2725</spage><epage>2756</epage><pages>2725-2756</pages><issn>0002-8282</issn><eissn>1944-7981</eissn><coden>AENRAA</coden><abstract>We revisit to what extent the increase in income inequality since 1980 was mirrored by consumption inequality. We do so by constructing an alternative measure of consumption expenditure using a demand system to correct for systematic measurement error in the Consumer Expenditure Survey. Our estimation exploits the relative expenditure of high- and low-income households on luxuries versus necessities. This double differencing corrects for measurement error that can vary over time by good and income. We find consumption inequality tracked income inequality much more closely than estimated by direct responses on expenditures.</abstract><cop>Nashville</cop><pub>American Economic Association</pub><doi>10.1257/aer.20120599</doi><tpages>32</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0002-8282 |
ispartof | The American economic review, 2015-09, Vol.105 (9), p.2725-2756 |
issn | 0002-8282 1944-7981 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1878798153 |
source | EBSCOhost Business Source Complete; JSTOR Archive Collection A-Z Listing; American Economic Association |
subjects | Bias Consumer economics Consumer spending Consumers Consumption Elasticity of demand Entertainment Estimates Expenditures Food High income Household consumption Households Income estimates Income inequality Income taxes Low income groups Relative prices Savings rates Total expenditures Trends |
title | Has Consumption Inequality Mirrored Income Inequality? |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-18T09%3A33%3A36IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Has%20Consumption%20Inequality%20Mirrored%20Income%20Inequality?&rft.jtitle=The%20American%20economic%20review&rft.au=Aguiar,%20Mark&rft.date=2015-09-01&rft.volume=105&rft.issue=9&rft.spage=2725&rft.epage=2756&rft.pages=2725-2756&rft.issn=0002-8282&rft.eissn=1944-7981&rft.coden=AENRAA&rft_id=info:doi/10.1257/aer.20120599&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_proqu%3E43821356%3C/jstor_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1753557387&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_jstor_id=43821356&rfr_iscdi=true |