Early Developmental Screening for Children in Foster Care
Limited data exist about the ideal timing of developmental screening for young children entering foster care, and current best practice recommends screening by 1 month into care to prioritize resources for evaluation. Therefore, we aimed to: (1) compare detection rates for potential developmental de...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of child and family studies 2016-07, Vol.25 (7), p.2155-2163 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , , , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 2163 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 7 |
| container_start_page | 2155 |
| container_title | Journal of child and family studies |
| container_volume | 25 |
| creator | Hodges, Kelly L. Landin, MacKenzie D. Nugent, Melodee L. Simpson, Pippa M. |
| description | Limited data exist about the ideal timing of developmental screening for young children entering foster care, and current best practice recommends screening by 1 month into care to prioritize resources for evaluation. Therefore, we aimed to: (1) compare detection rates for potential developmental delay (DD) at foster care entry before and after implementation of a developmental screen and (2) examine accuracy of developmental screening when performed at entry and 1 month into care. Charts of 124 children |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1007/s10826-016-0397-6 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1878797671</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>4087839281</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c349t-197d7a8fdef33ea1d758b3a1735fd9704df8f6784afa1d99eae23fdce422d8ac3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kEFLAzEQhYMoWKs_wNuCFy_RTLK7SY5SWxUKHtRziJtJ3bLN1mQr9N-bsh5E8DDMMPO9x_AIuQR2A4zJ2wRM8ZoyyCW0pPURmUAlBeWqFMd5ZjWnwHh5Ss5SWjPGtOJ6QvTcxm5f3OMXdv12g2GwXfHSRMTQhlXh-1jMPtrORQxFG4pFnwbMKxvxnJx42yW8-OlT8raYv84e6fL54Wl2t6SNKPVAQUsnrfIOvRBowclKvQsLUlTeaclK55WvpSqtz0et0SIX3jVYcu6UbcSUXI--29h_7jANZtOmBrvOBux3yYCSSmpZS8jo1R903e9iyN8ZkLoGXikmMgUj1cQ-pYjebGO7sXFvgJlDmGYM0-QwzSFMU2cNHzUps2GF8Zfzv6Jv1Pp2Vg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1796125803</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Early Developmental Screening for Children in Foster Care</title><source>Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA)</source><source>EBSCOhost Education Source</source><source>SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings</source><creator>Hodges, Kelly L. ; Landin, MacKenzie D. ; Nugent, Melodee L. ; Simpson, Pippa M.</creator><creatorcontrib>Hodges, Kelly L. ; Landin, MacKenzie D. ; Nugent, Melodee L. ; Simpson, Pippa M.</creatorcontrib><description>Limited data exist about the ideal timing of developmental screening for young children entering foster care, and current best practice recommends screening by 1 month into care to prioritize resources for evaluation. Therefore, we aimed to: (1) compare detection rates for potential developmental delay (DD) at foster care entry before and after implementation of a developmental screen and (2) examine accuracy of developmental screening when performed at entry and 1 month into care. Charts of 124 children <6 years evaluated for an initial foster care health assessment (IFCHA) were reviewed to determine baseline detection rates for potential DD. The Parents’ Evaluation of Developmental Status (PEDS) screening tool was then prospectively administered to 167 children <6 years during their IFCHA to determine detection rates. One month following the IFCHA, caregivers were re-contacted, and the screen was re-administered. Accuracy of the initial PEDS screen was compared to the 1 month PEDS screen by calculation of sensitivity and specificity. At baseline, potential DD was detected in 34 % of children at the IFCHA compared to 46 % after implementation of the PEDS (
P
= 0.041). Compared to the 1 month screen, the early screen had a sensitivity of 75 % and specificity of 88 %. Use of a developmental screening tool at foster care entry increased detection of potential DD, and the results remained consistent with screening 1 month later. These results support use of a developmental screen for children in foster care and suggest that screening be performed as early as possible to expedite necessary evaluations and referrals.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1062-1024</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1573-2843</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s10826-016-0397-6</identifier><identifier>CODEN: JCFSES</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New York: Springer US</publisher><subject>Accuracy ; Behavioral Science and Psychology ; Best practice ; Caregivers ; Child and School Psychology ; Child development ; Children ; Detection ; Developmental Delays ; Developmental psychology ; Developmentally delayed young children ; Early intervention ; Foster care ; Foster children ; Health care ; Medical screening ; Original Paper ; Psychology ; Referrals ; Sensitivity ; Social Sciences ; Sociology ; Special Needs Students ; Timing ; Young Children</subject><ispartof>Journal of child and family studies, 2016-07, Vol.25 (7), p.2155-2163</ispartof><rights>Springer Science+Business Media New York 2016</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c349t-197d7a8fdef33ea1d758b3a1735fd9704df8f6784afa1d99eae23fdce422d8ac3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c349t-197d7a8fdef33ea1d758b3a1735fd9704df8f6784afa1d99eae23fdce422d8ac3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s10826-016-0397-6$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10826-016-0397-6$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,12846,27924,27925,30999,41488,42557,51319</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Hodges, Kelly L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Landin, MacKenzie D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nugent, Melodee L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Simpson, Pippa M.</creatorcontrib><title>Early Developmental Screening for Children in Foster Care</title><title>Journal of child and family studies</title><addtitle>J Child Fam Stud</addtitle><description>Limited data exist about the ideal timing of developmental screening for young children entering foster care, and current best practice recommends screening by 1 month into care to prioritize resources for evaluation. Therefore, we aimed to: (1) compare detection rates for potential developmental delay (DD) at foster care entry before and after implementation of a developmental screen and (2) examine accuracy of developmental screening when performed at entry and 1 month into care. Charts of 124 children <6 years evaluated for an initial foster care health assessment (IFCHA) were reviewed to determine baseline detection rates for potential DD. The Parents’ Evaluation of Developmental Status (PEDS) screening tool was then prospectively administered to 167 children <6 years during their IFCHA to determine detection rates. One month following the IFCHA, caregivers were re-contacted, and the screen was re-administered. Accuracy of the initial PEDS screen was compared to the 1 month PEDS screen by calculation of sensitivity and specificity. At baseline, potential DD was detected in 34 % of children at the IFCHA compared to 46 % after implementation of the PEDS (
P
= 0.041). Compared to the 1 month screen, the early screen had a sensitivity of 75 % and specificity of 88 %. Use of a developmental screening tool at foster care entry increased detection of potential DD, and the results remained consistent with screening 1 month later. These results support use of a developmental screen for children in foster care and suggest that screening be performed as early as possible to expedite necessary evaluations and referrals.</description><subject>Accuracy</subject><subject>Behavioral Science and Psychology</subject><subject>Best practice</subject><subject>Caregivers</subject><subject>Child and School Psychology</subject><subject>Child development</subject><subject>Children</subject><subject>Detection</subject><subject>Developmental Delays</subject><subject>Developmental psychology</subject><subject>Developmentally delayed young children</subject><subject>Early intervention</subject><subject>Foster care</subject><subject>Foster children</subject><subject>Health care</subject><subject>Medical screening</subject><subject>Original Paper</subject><subject>Psychology</subject><subject>Referrals</subject><subject>Sensitivity</subject><subject>Social Sciences</subject><subject>Sociology</subject><subject>Special Needs Students</subject><subject>Timing</subject><subject>Young Children</subject><issn>1062-1024</issn><issn>1573-2843</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2016</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7QJ</sourceid><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kEFLAzEQhYMoWKs_wNuCFy_RTLK7SY5SWxUKHtRziJtJ3bLN1mQr9N-bsh5E8DDMMPO9x_AIuQR2A4zJ2wRM8ZoyyCW0pPURmUAlBeWqFMd5ZjWnwHh5Ss5SWjPGtOJ6QvTcxm5f3OMXdv12g2GwXfHSRMTQhlXh-1jMPtrORQxFG4pFnwbMKxvxnJx42yW8-OlT8raYv84e6fL54Wl2t6SNKPVAQUsnrfIOvRBowclKvQsLUlTeaclK55WvpSqtz0et0SIX3jVYcu6UbcSUXI--29h_7jANZtOmBrvOBux3yYCSSmpZS8jo1R903e9iyN8ZkLoGXikmMgUj1cQ-pYjebGO7sXFvgJlDmGYM0-QwzSFMU2cNHzUps2GF8Zfzv6Jv1Pp2Vg</recordid><startdate>20160701</startdate><enddate>20160701</enddate><creator>Hodges, Kelly L.</creator><creator>Landin, MacKenzie D.</creator><creator>Nugent, Melodee L.</creator><creator>Simpson, Pippa M.</creator><general>Springer US</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>0-V</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QJ</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88B</scope><scope>88G</scope><scope>88J</scope><scope>8A4</scope><scope>8AM</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ALSLI</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGRYB</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>CJNVE</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>HEHIP</scope><scope>JBE</scope><scope>K7.</scope><scope>M0O</scope><scope>M0P</scope><scope>M2M</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>M2R</scope><scope>M2S</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>PQEDU</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PSYQQ</scope><scope>Q9U</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20160701</creationdate><title>Early Developmental Screening for Children in Foster Care</title><author>Hodges, Kelly L. ; Landin, MacKenzie D. ; Nugent, Melodee L. ; Simpson, Pippa M.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c349t-197d7a8fdef33ea1d758b3a1735fd9704df8f6784afa1d99eae23fdce422d8ac3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2016</creationdate><topic>Accuracy</topic><topic>Behavioral Science and Psychology</topic><topic>Best practice</topic><topic>Caregivers</topic><topic>Child and School Psychology</topic><topic>Child development</topic><topic>Children</topic><topic>Detection</topic><topic>Developmental Delays</topic><topic>Developmental psychology</topic><topic>Developmentally delayed young children</topic><topic>Early intervention</topic><topic>Foster care</topic><topic>Foster children</topic><topic>Health care</topic><topic>Medical screening</topic><topic>Original Paper</topic><topic>Psychology</topic><topic>Referrals</topic><topic>Sensitivity</topic><topic>Social Sciences</topic><topic>Sociology</topic><topic>Special Needs Students</topic><topic>Timing</topic><topic>Young Children</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Hodges, Kelly L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Landin, MacKenzie D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nugent, Melodee L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Simpson, Pippa M.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Social Sciences Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Education Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Psychology Database (Alumni)</collection><collection>Social Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Education Periodicals</collection><collection>Criminal Justice Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Social Science Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Criminology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Education Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>Sociology Collection</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>ProQuest Criminal Justice (Alumni)</collection><collection>Criminal Justice Database</collection><collection>Education Database</collection><collection>Psychology Database</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Social Science Database</collection><collection>Sociology Database</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Education</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest One Psychology</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><jtitle>Journal of child and family studies</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Hodges, Kelly L.</au><au>Landin, MacKenzie D.</au><au>Nugent, Melodee L.</au><au>Simpson, Pippa M.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Early Developmental Screening for Children in Foster Care</atitle><jtitle>Journal of child and family studies</jtitle><stitle>J Child Fam Stud</stitle><date>2016-07-01</date><risdate>2016</risdate><volume>25</volume><issue>7</issue><spage>2155</spage><epage>2163</epage><pages>2155-2163</pages><issn>1062-1024</issn><eissn>1573-2843</eissn><coden>JCFSES</coden><abstract>Limited data exist about the ideal timing of developmental screening for young children entering foster care, and current best practice recommends screening by 1 month into care to prioritize resources for evaluation. Therefore, we aimed to: (1) compare detection rates for potential developmental delay (DD) at foster care entry before and after implementation of a developmental screen and (2) examine accuracy of developmental screening when performed at entry and 1 month into care. Charts of 124 children <6 years evaluated for an initial foster care health assessment (IFCHA) were reviewed to determine baseline detection rates for potential DD. The Parents’ Evaluation of Developmental Status (PEDS) screening tool was then prospectively administered to 167 children <6 years during their IFCHA to determine detection rates. One month following the IFCHA, caregivers were re-contacted, and the screen was re-administered. Accuracy of the initial PEDS screen was compared to the 1 month PEDS screen by calculation of sensitivity and specificity. At baseline, potential DD was detected in 34 % of children at the IFCHA compared to 46 % after implementation of the PEDS (
P
= 0.041). Compared to the 1 month screen, the early screen had a sensitivity of 75 % and specificity of 88 %. Use of a developmental screening tool at foster care entry increased detection of potential DD, and the results remained consistent with screening 1 month later. These results support use of a developmental screen for children in foster care and suggest that screening be performed as early as possible to expedite necessary evaluations and referrals.</abstract><cop>New York</cop><pub>Springer US</pub><doi>10.1007/s10826-016-0397-6</doi><tpages>9</tpages></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 1062-1024 |
| ispartof | Journal of child and family studies, 2016-07, Vol.25 (7), p.2155-2163 |
| issn | 1062-1024 1573-2843 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1878797671 |
| source | Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA); EBSCOhost Education Source; SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings |
| subjects | Accuracy Behavioral Science and Psychology Best practice Caregivers Child and School Psychology Child development Children Detection Developmental Delays Developmental psychology Developmentally delayed young children Early intervention Foster care Foster children Health care Medical screening Original Paper Psychology Referrals Sensitivity Social Sciences Sociology Special Needs Students Timing Young Children |
| title | Early Developmental Screening for Children in Foster Care |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-05T13%3A19%3A15IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Early%20Developmental%20Screening%20for%20Children%20in%20Foster%20Care&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20child%20and%20family%20studies&rft.au=Hodges,%20Kelly%20L.&rft.date=2016-07-01&rft.volume=25&rft.issue=7&rft.spage=2155&rft.epage=2163&rft.pages=2155-2163&rft.issn=1062-1024&rft.eissn=1573-2843&rft.coden=JCFSES&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s10826-016-0397-6&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E4087839281%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1796125803&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |