Knowing and Governing: The Mapping of the Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector as Statecraft
Recent debate in Voluntas and elsewhere has paid a great deal of attention to the subject of mapping the nonprofit sector. However, very little attention has been paid to the ways in which the practice of mapping is a political mode of knowing and the ways in which knowing is governing. In this essa...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Voluntas (Manchester, England) England), 2016-02, Vol.27 (1), p.392-408 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 408 |
---|---|
container_issue | 1 |
container_start_page | 392 |
container_title | Voluntas (Manchester, England) |
container_volume | 27 |
creator | Nickel, Patricia Mooney Eikenberry, Angela M. |
description | Recent debate in Voluntas and elsewhere has paid a great deal of attention to the subject of mapping the nonprofit sector. However, very little attention has been paid to the ways in which the practice of mapping is a political mode of knowing and the ways in which knowing is governing. In this essay, we turn to critical theory and political anthropology in order to demonstrate how mapping as it is currently practiced is a mode of knowledge inquiry that facilitates statecraft. In light of these interdisciplinary perspectives, we wrestle with the implications of knowing—and thereby governing—voluntary collective organization in this manner. We conclude that this approach potentially disciplines the qualitative dimensions of democratic associational life and misrepresents the possibilities of social change. Le récent débat dans la revue Voluntas et ailleurs a accordé beaucoup d'attention à la question d'une cartographie du secteur à but non lucratif. Toutefois, on parle peu de la manière dont la pratique de la cartographie est un mode politique de connaissance et de la façon dont la connaissance est au pouvoir. Dans cet essai, nous nous tournons vers la théorie critique et anthropologie politique afin de démontrer comment la cartographie, telle qu'elle est pratiquée actuellement, est un mode d'examen de la connaissance qui facilite l'art de gouverner. En raison de ces perspectives interdisciplinaires, nous nous attaquons aux implications de la connaissance – au pouvoir – de l'organisation collective bénévole de cette manière. Nous concluons que cette approche nuit potentiellement aux dimensions qualitatives de la vie associative démocratique et dénature les possibilités de changement social. Das Thema Mapping des gemeinnützigen Sektors erhielt in jüngsten Diskussionen in Voluntas und anderswo große Aufmerksamkeit. Allerdings wurde die Art und Weise, in der die Praxis des Mapping einen politischen Wissensmodus darstellt und die Art und Weise, in der Wissen Steuerung ist, kaum angesprochen. In dieser Abhandlung greifen wir auf die Kritische Theorie und die politische Anthropologie zurück, um zu demonstrieren, wie das Mapping in seiner derzeitigen Praxis ein Modus der Wissenssammlung ist, die die Staatskunst ermöglicht. Vor dem Hintergrund dieser interdisziplinären Perspektiven ringen wir mit den Implikationen des Wissens über - und somit der Steuerung von - gemeinnützigen kollektiven Organisation auf diese Weise. Wir kommen zu dem Schluss, dass dieser Ansatz d |
doi_str_mv | 10.1007/s11266-015-9552-8 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>jstor_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1878796808</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>44668745</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>44668745</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c371t-3f1a3d31941a0eed9abd700ffd71b75cc6a21d96ebe0e9e42401b8da1ceddc303</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kMtuFDEQRS0EEkPIB7BAaikbNp1UtdsvdiiCJEqARR5by2NXhxlN7MH2gPj7eGgUIRasrJLPvS4fxt4gHCOAOimIg5Q9oOiNEEOvn7EFCsV7pbV-zhZghOq1kuIle1XKGgC4RLNgd5cx_VzF-87F0J2lH5Rjm953N9-o--y22_1Vmrraxi8pbnOaVvU3e5c2u1hd_tVdk68pd65019VV8tlN9TV7MblNocM_5wG7_fTx5vS8v_p6dnH64ar3XGHt-YSOB45mRAdEwbhlUADTFBQulfBeugGDkbQkIEPjMAIudXDoKQTPgR-wd3Nv2-z7jkq1D6viabNxkdKuWNRKKyM16IYe_YOu0y7Htp1FJYxBMINoFM6Uz6mUTJPd5tVD-6ZFsHvTdjZtm2m7N233zcOcKY2N95T_av5P6O0cWpdm7-mVcZRSq1HwRzVjir4</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1759910925</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Knowing and Governing: The Mapping of the Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector as Statecraft</title><source>SpringerLink (Online service)</source><source>Sociological Abstracts</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><source>JSTOR</source><creator>Nickel, Patricia Mooney ; Eikenberry, Angela M.</creator><creatorcontrib>Nickel, Patricia Mooney ; Eikenberry, Angela M.</creatorcontrib><description>Recent debate in Voluntas and elsewhere has paid a great deal of attention to the subject of mapping the nonprofit sector. However, very little attention has been paid to the ways in which the practice of mapping is a political mode of knowing and the ways in which knowing is governing. In this essay, we turn to critical theory and political anthropology in order to demonstrate how mapping as it is currently practiced is a mode of knowledge inquiry that facilitates statecraft. In light of these interdisciplinary perspectives, we wrestle with the implications of knowing—and thereby governing—voluntary collective organization in this manner. We conclude that this approach potentially disciplines the qualitative dimensions of democratic associational life and misrepresents the possibilities of social change. Le récent débat dans la revue Voluntas et ailleurs a accordé beaucoup d'attention à la question d'une cartographie du secteur à but non lucratif. Toutefois, on parle peu de la manière dont la pratique de la cartographie est un mode politique de connaissance et de la façon dont la connaissance est au pouvoir. Dans cet essai, nous nous tournons vers la théorie critique et anthropologie politique afin de démontrer comment la cartographie, telle qu'elle est pratiquée actuellement, est un mode d'examen de la connaissance qui facilite l'art de gouverner. En raison de ces perspectives interdisciplinaires, nous nous attaquons aux implications de la connaissance – au pouvoir – de l'organisation collective bénévole de cette manière. Nous concluons que cette approche nuit potentiellement aux dimensions qualitatives de la vie associative démocratique et dénature les possibilités de changement social. Das Thema Mapping des gemeinnützigen Sektors erhielt in jüngsten Diskussionen in Voluntas und anderswo große Aufmerksamkeit. Allerdings wurde die Art und Weise, in der die Praxis des Mapping einen politischen Wissensmodus darstellt und die Art und Weise, in der Wissen Steuerung ist, kaum angesprochen. In dieser Abhandlung greifen wir auf die Kritische Theorie und die politische Anthropologie zurück, um zu demonstrieren, wie das Mapping in seiner derzeitigen Praxis ein Modus der Wissenssammlung ist, die die Staatskunst ermöglicht. Vor dem Hintergrund dieser interdisziplinären Perspektiven ringen wir mit den Implikationen des Wissens über - und somit der Steuerung von - gemeinnützigen kollektiven Organisation auf diese Weise. Wir kommen zu dem Schluss, dass dieser Ansatz die qualitativen Dimensionen des demokratischen Vereinslebens potenziell diszipliniert und die Möglichkeiten des sozialen Wandels falsch darstellt. Debates recientes en Voluntas y en otras partes han prestado una gran atención al tema de cartografiar el sector de las organizaciones sin ánimo de lucro. Sin embargo, se ha prestado muy poca atención a las formas en las que la práctica de la cartografía es un modo político de conocer y las formas en las que conocer es gobernar. En el presente ensayo, volvemos a la teoría crítica y a la antropología política con el fin de demostrar como la cartografía tal como se practica actualmente es un modo de investigación del conocimiento que facilita el arte de gobernar. A la luz de estas perspectivas interdisciplinarias, lidiamos con las implicaciones de conocer - y por lo tanto de gobernar - organizaciones colectivas voluntarias de esta manera. Concluimos que este enfoque sanciona potencialmente las dimensiones cualitativas de la vida asociativa democrática y malinterpreta las posibilidades de cambio social.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0957-8765</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1573-7888</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s11266-015-9552-8</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New York: Springer</publisher><subject>Associations ; Civil law ; Civil society ; Critical theory ; Economic sectors ; Formalization ; Information production ; Interdisciplinary aspects ; Knowledge ; Mapping ; Non-profit organizations ; Nonprofit organizations ; Nonprofit sector ; Original Paper ; Political Science ; Social change ; Social Policy ; Social Sciences ; Social structure ; Studies ; United States ; Voluntary associations ; Volunteers ; World Bank</subject><ispartof>Voluntas (Manchester, England), 2016-02, Vol.27 (1), p.392-408</ispartof><rights>International Society for Third-Sector Research and The Johns Hopkins University 2015</rights><rights>International Society for Third-Sector Research and The Johns Hopkins University 2016</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c371t-3f1a3d31941a0eed9abd700ffd71b75cc6a21d96ebe0e9e42401b8da1ceddc303</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c371t-3f1a3d31941a0eed9abd700ffd71b75cc6a21d96ebe0e9e42401b8da1ceddc303</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/44668745$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/44668745$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>315,781,785,804,27346,27926,27927,33776,41490,42559,51321,58019,58252</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Nickel, Patricia Mooney</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Eikenberry, Angela M.</creatorcontrib><title>Knowing and Governing: The Mapping of the Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector as Statecraft</title><title>Voluntas (Manchester, England)</title><addtitle>Voluntas</addtitle><description>Recent debate in Voluntas and elsewhere has paid a great deal of attention to the subject of mapping the nonprofit sector. However, very little attention has been paid to the ways in which the practice of mapping is a political mode of knowing and the ways in which knowing is governing. In this essay, we turn to critical theory and political anthropology in order to demonstrate how mapping as it is currently practiced is a mode of knowledge inquiry that facilitates statecraft. In light of these interdisciplinary perspectives, we wrestle with the implications of knowing—and thereby governing—voluntary collective organization in this manner. We conclude that this approach potentially disciplines the qualitative dimensions of democratic associational life and misrepresents the possibilities of social change. Le récent débat dans la revue Voluntas et ailleurs a accordé beaucoup d'attention à la question d'une cartographie du secteur à but non lucratif. Toutefois, on parle peu de la manière dont la pratique de la cartographie est un mode politique de connaissance et de la façon dont la connaissance est au pouvoir. Dans cet essai, nous nous tournons vers la théorie critique et anthropologie politique afin de démontrer comment la cartographie, telle qu'elle est pratiquée actuellement, est un mode d'examen de la connaissance qui facilite l'art de gouverner. En raison de ces perspectives interdisciplinaires, nous nous attaquons aux implications de la connaissance – au pouvoir – de l'organisation collective bénévole de cette manière. Nous concluons que cette approche nuit potentiellement aux dimensions qualitatives de la vie associative démocratique et dénature les possibilités de changement social. Das Thema Mapping des gemeinnützigen Sektors erhielt in jüngsten Diskussionen in Voluntas und anderswo große Aufmerksamkeit. Allerdings wurde die Art und Weise, in der die Praxis des Mapping einen politischen Wissensmodus darstellt und die Art und Weise, in der Wissen Steuerung ist, kaum angesprochen. In dieser Abhandlung greifen wir auf die Kritische Theorie und die politische Anthropologie zurück, um zu demonstrieren, wie das Mapping in seiner derzeitigen Praxis ein Modus der Wissenssammlung ist, die die Staatskunst ermöglicht. Vor dem Hintergrund dieser interdisziplinären Perspektiven ringen wir mit den Implikationen des Wissens über - und somit der Steuerung von - gemeinnützigen kollektiven Organisation auf diese Weise. Wir kommen zu dem Schluss, dass dieser Ansatz die qualitativen Dimensionen des demokratischen Vereinslebens potenziell diszipliniert und die Möglichkeiten des sozialen Wandels falsch darstellt. Debates recientes en Voluntas y en otras partes han prestado una gran atención al tema de cartografiar el sector de las organizaciones sin ánimo de lucro. Sin embargo, se ha prestado muy poca atención a las formas en las que la práctica de la cartografía es un modo político de conocer y las formas en las que conocer es gobernar. En el presente ensayo, volvemos a la teoría crítica y a la antropología política con el fin de demostrar como la cartografía tal como se practica actualmente es un modo de investigación del conocimiento que facilita el arte de gobernar. A la luz de estas perspectivas interdisciplinarias, lidiamos con las implicaciones de conocer - y por lo tanto de gobernar - organizaciones colectivas voluntarias de esta manera. Concluimos que este enfoque sanciona potencialmente las dimensiones cualitativas de la vida asociativa democrática y malinterpreta las posibilidades de cambio social.</description><subject>Associations</subject><subject>Civil law</subject><subject>Civil society</subject><subject>Critical theory</subject><subject>Economic sectors</subject><subject>Formalization</subject><subject>Information production</subject><subject>Interdisciplinary aspects</subject><subject>Knowledge</subject><subject>Mapping</subject><subject>Non-profit organizations</subject><subject>Nonprofit organizations</subject><subject>Nonprofit sector</subject><subject>Original Paper</subject><subject>Political Science</subject><subject>Social change</subject><subject>Social Policy</subject><subject>Social Sciences</subject><subject>Social structure</subject><subject>Studies</subject><subject>United States</subject><subject>Voluntary associations</subject><subject>Volunteers</subject><subject>World Bank</subject><issn>0957-8765</issn><issn>1573-7888</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2016</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>BHHNA</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kMtuFDEQRS0EEkPIB7BAaikbNp1UtdsvdiiCJEqARR5by2NXhxlN7MH2gPj7eGgUIRasrJLPvS4fxt4gHCOAOimIg5Q9oOiNEEOvn7EFCsV7pbV-zhZghOq1kuIle1XKGgC4RLNgd5cx_VzF-87F0J2lH5Rjm953N9-o--y22_1Vmrraxi8pbnOaVvU3e5c2u1hd_tVdk68pd65019VV8tlN9TV7MblNocM_5wG7_fTx5vS8v_p6dnH64ar3XGHt-YSOB45mRAdEwbhlUADTFBQulfBeugGDkbQkIEPjMAIudXDoKQTPgR-wd3Nv2-z7jkq1D6viabNxkdKuWNRKKyM16IYe_YOu0y7Htp1FJYxBMINoFM6Uz6mUTJPd5tVD-6ZFsHvTdjZtm2m7N233zcOcKY2N95T_av5P6O0cWpdm7-mVcZRSq1HwRzVjir4</recordid><startdate>20160201</startdate><enddate>20160201</enddate><creator>Nickel, Patricia Mooney</creator><creator>Eikenberry, Angela M.</creator><general>Springer</general><general>Springer US</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>0-V</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7U3</scope><scope>7U4</scope><scope>7WY</scope><scope>7WZ</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>87Z</scope><scope>88J</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8FL</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ALSLI</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BEZIV</scope><scope>BHHNA</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWI</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>FRNLG</scope><scope>F~G</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>HEHIP</scope><scope>JBE</scope><scope>K60</scope><scope>K6~</scope><scope>L.-</scope><scope>M0C</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>M2R</scope><scope>M2S</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>PQBIZ</scope><scope>PQBZA</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>WZK</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20160201</creationdate><title>Knowing and Governing: The Mapping of the Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector as Statecraft</title><author>Nickel, Patricia Mooney ; Eikenberry, Angela M.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c371t-3f1a3d31941a0eed9abd700ffd71b75cc6a21d96ebe0e9e42401b8da1ceddc303</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2016</creationdate><topic>Associations</topic><topic>Civil law</topic><topic>Civil society</topic><topic>Critical theory</topic><topic>Economic sectors</topic><topic>Formalization</topic><topic>Information production</topic><topic>Interdisciplinary aspects</topic><topic>Knowledge</topic><topic>Mapping</topic><topic>Non-profit organizations</topic><topic>Nonprofit organizations</topic><topic>Nonprofit sector</topic><topic>Original Paper</topic><topic>Political Science</topic><topic>Social change</topic><topic>Social Policy</topic><topic>Social Sciences</topic><topic>Social structure</topic><topic>Studies</topic><topic>United States</topic><topic>Voluntary associations</topic><topic>Volunteers</topic><topic>World Bank</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Nickel, Patricia Mooney</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Eikenberry, Angela M.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Social Sciences Premium Collection【Remote access available】</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Social Services Abstracts</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts (pre-2017)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (PDF only)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection</collection><collection>Social Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Social Science Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>AUTh Library subscriptions: ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>Sociology Collection</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Advanced</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (ProQuest)</collection><collection>ProQuest Research Library</collection><collection>Social Science Database (ProQuest)</collection><collection>Sociology Database (ProQuest)</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts (Ovid)</collection><jtitle>Voluntas (Manchester, England)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Nickel, Patricia Mooney</au><au>Eikenberry, Angela M.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Knowing and Governing: The Mapping of the Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector as Statecraft</atitle><jtitle>Voluntas (Manchester, England)</jtitle><stitle>Voluntas</stitle><date>2016-02-01</date><risdate>2016</risdate><volume>27</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>392</spage><epage>408</epage><pages>392-408</pages><issn>0957-8765</issn><eissn>1573-7888</eissn><abstract>Recent debate in Voluntas and elsewhere has paid a great deal of attention to the subject of mapping the nonprofit sector. However, very little attention has been paid to the ways in which the practice of mapping is a political mode of knowing and the ways in which knowing is governing. In this essay, we turn to critical theory and political anthropology in order to demonstrate how mapping as it is currently practiced is a mode of knowledge inquiry that facilitates statecraft. In light of these interdisciplinary perspectives, we wrestle with the implications of knowing—and thereby governing—voluntary collective organization in this manner. We conclude that this approach potentially disciplines the qualitative dimensions of democratic associational life and misrepresents the possibilities of social change. Le récent débat dans la revue Voluntas et ailleurs a accordé beaucoup d'attention à la question d'une cartographie du secteur à but non lucratif. Toutefois, on parle peu de la manière dont la pratique de la cartographie est un mode politique de connaissance et de la façon dont la connaissance est au pouvoir. Dans cet essai, nous nous tournons vers la théorie critique et anthropologie politique afin de démontrer comment la cartographie, telle qu'elle est pratiquée actuellement, est un mode d'examen de la connaissance qui facilite l'art de gouverner. En raison de ces perspectives interdisciplinaires, nous nous attaquons aux implications de la connaissance – au pouvoir – de l'organisation collective bénévole de cette manière. Nous concluons que cette approche nuit potentiellement aux dimensions qualitatives de la vie associative démocratique et dénature les possibilités de changement social. Das Thema Mapping des gemeinnützigen Sektors erhielt in jüngsten Diskussionen in Voluntas und anderswo große Aufmerksamkeit. Allerdings wurde die Art und Weise, in der die Praxis des Mapping einen politischen Wissensmodus darstellt und die Art und Weise, in der Wissen Steuerung ist, kaum angesprochen. In dieser Abhandlung greifen wir auf die Kritische Theorie und die politische Anthropologie zurück, um zu demonstrieren, wie das Mapping in seiner derzeitigen Praxis ein Modus der Wissenssammlung ist, die die Staatskunst ermöglicht. Vor dem Hintergrund dieser interdisziplinären Perspektiven ringen wir mit den Implikationen des Wissens über - und somit der Steuerung von - gemeinnützigen kollektiven Organisation auf diese Weise. Wir kommen zu dem Schluss, dass dieser Ansatz die qualitativen Dimensionen des demokratischen Vereinslebens potenziell diszipliniert und die Möglichkeiten des sozialen Wandels falsch darstellt. Debates recientes en Voluntas y en otras partes han prestado una gran atención al tema de cartografiar el sector de las organizaciones sin ánimo de lucro. Sin embargo, se ha prestado muy poca atención a las formas en las que la práctica de la cartografía es un modo político de conocer y las formas en las que conocer es gobernar. En el presente ensayo, volvemos a la teoría crítica y a la antropología política con el fin de demostrar como la cartografía tal como se practica actualmente es un modo de investigación del conocimiento que facilita el arte de gobernar. A la luz de estas perspectivas interdisciplinarias, lidiamos con las implicaciones de conocer - y por lo tanto de gobernar - organizaciones colectivas voluntarias de esta manera. Concluimos que este enfoque sanciona potencialmente las dimensiones cualitativas de la vida asociativa democrática y malinterpreta las posibilidades de cambio social.</abstract><cop>New York</cop><pub>Springer</pub><doi>10.1007/s11266-015-9552-8</doi><tpages>17</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0957-8765 |
ispartof | Voluntas (Manchester, England), 2016-02, Vol.27 (1), p.392-408 |
issn | 0957-8765 1573-7888 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1878796808 |
source | SpringerLink (Online service); Sociological Abstracts; Alma/SFX Local Collection; JSTOR |
subjects | Associations Civil law Civil society Critical theory Economic sectors Formalization Information production Interdisciplinary aspects Knowledge Mapping Non-profit organizations Nonprofit organizations Nonprofit sector Original Paper Political Science Social change Social Policy Social Sciences Social structure Studies United States Voluntary associations Volunteers World Bank |
title | Knowing and Governing: The Mapping of the Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector as Statecraft |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-17T20%3A37%3A51IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Knowing%20and%20Governing:%20The%20Mapping%20of%20the%20Nonprofit%20and%20Voluntary%20Sector%20as%20Statecraft&rft.jtitle=Voluntas%20(Manchester,%20England)&rft.au=Nickel,%20Patricia%20Mooney&rft.date=2016-02-01&rft.volume=27&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=392&rft.epage=408&rft.pages=392-408&rft.issn=0957-8765&rft.eissn=1573-7888&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s11266-015-9552-8&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_proqu%3E44668745%3C/jstor_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1759910925&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_jstor_id=44668745&rfr_iscdi=true |