Ascending Combinatorial Auctions with Risk Averse Bidders

Ascending combinatorial auctions are being used in an increasing number of spectrum sales worldwide, as well as in other multi-item markets in procurement and logistics. Much research has focused on pricing and payment rules in such ascending auctions. However, recent game-theoretical research has s...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Group decision and negotiation 2016-05, Vol.25 (3), p.609-639
Hauptverfasser: Guler, Kemal, Bichler, Martin, Petrakis, Ioannis
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 639
container_issue 3
container_start_page 609
container_title Group decision and negotiation
container_volume 25
creator Guler, Kemal
Bichler, Martin
Petrakis, Ioannis
description Ascending combinatorial auctions are being used in an increasing number of spectrum sales worldwide, as well as in other multi-item markets in procurement and logistics. Much research has focused on pricing and payment rules in such ascending auctions. However, recent game-theoretical research has shown that such auctions can even lead to inefficient perfect Bayesian equilibria with risk-neutral bidders. There is a fundamental free-rider problem without a simple solution, raising the question whether ascending combinatorial auctions can be expected to be efficient in the field. Risk aversion is arguably a significant driver of bidding behavior in high-stakes auctions. We analyze the impact of risk aversion on equilibrium bidding strategies and efficiency in a threshold problem with one global and several local bidders. Due to the underlying free-rider problem, the impact of risk-aversion on equilibrium bidding strategies of local bidders is not obvious. We characterize the necessary and sufficient conditions for the perfect Bayesian equilibria of the ascending auction mechanism to have the local bidders to drop at the reserve price. Interestingly, in spite of the free-riding opportunities of local bidders, risk-aversion reduces the scope of the non-bidding equilibrium. The results help explain the high efficiency of ascending combinatorial auctions observed in the lab.
doi_str_mv 10.1007/s10726-015-9454-6
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1878794609</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>4024262161</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c423t-eb8da92ad919ebca4e6fc53ecec99f4aee60da842e459a3e2e6b44be5903f11b3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kE1LxDAQhoMouK7-AG8FL16qkzQfzbEufsGCIHoOaTpds3bbNekq_nsj9SCCpxmY530ZHkJOKVxQAHUZKSgmc6Ai11zwXO6RGRWK5VqD2icz0OnKJOeH5CjGNQAwAWpGdBUd9o3vV9li2NS-t-MQvO2yaudGP_Qx-_DjS_bo42tWvWOImF35pknLMTlobRfx5GfOyfPN9dPiLl8-3N4vqmXuOCvGHOuysZrZRlONtbMcZetEgQ6d1i23iBIaW3KGXGhbIENZc16j0FC0lNbFnJxPvdswvO0wjmbj089dZ3scdtHQUpVKcwk6oWd_0PWwC336zlBV0oIC0yJRdKJcGGIM2Jpt8BsbPg0F8y3TTDJNkmm-ZRqZMmzKxMT2Kwy_mv8NfQGce3bx</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1781310295</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Ascending Combinatorial Auctions with Risk Averse Bidders</title><source>EBSCOhost Business Source Complete</source><source>SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings</source><creator>Guler, Kemal ; Bichler, Martin ; Petrakis, Ioannis</creator><creatorcontrib>Guler, Kemal ; Bichler, Martin ; Petrakis, Ioannis</creatorcontrib><description>Ascending combinatorial auctions are being used in an increasing number of spectrum sales worldwide, as well as in other multi-item markets in procurement and logistics. Much research has focused on pricing and payment rules in such ascending auctions. However, recent game-theoretical research has shown that such auctions can even lead to inefficient perfect Bayesian equilibria with risk-neutral bidders. There is a fundamental free-rider problem without a simple solution, raising the question whether ascending combinatorial auctions can be expected to be efficient in the field. Risk aversion is arguably a significant driver of bidding behavior in high-stakes auctions. We analyze the impact of risk aversion on equilibrium bidding strategies and efficiency in a threshold problem with one global and several local bidders. Due to the underlying free-rider problem, the impact of risk-aversion on equilibrium bidding strategies of local bidders is not obvious. We characterize the necessary and sufficient conditions for the perfect Bayesian equilibria of the ascending auction mechanism to have the local bidders to drop at the reserve price. Interestingly, in spite of the free-riding opportunities of local bidders, risk-aversion reduces the scope of the non-bidding equilibrium. The results help explain the high efficiency of ascending combinatorial auctions observed in the lab.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0926-2644</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1572-9907</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s10726-015-9454-6</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands</publisher><subject>Auctions ; Bids ; Biological and Physical Anthropology ; Business and Management ; Combinatorics ; Equilibrium ; Game theory ; Prices ; Risk aversion ; Spectrum allocation ; Studies</subject><ispartof>Group decision and negotiation, 2016-05, Vol.25 (3), p.609-639</ispartof><rights>Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2015</rights><rights>Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2016</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c423t-eb8da92ad919ebca4e6fc53ecec99f4aee60da842e459a3e2e6b44be5903f11b3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c423t-eb8da92ad919ebca4e6fc53ecec99f4aee60da842e459a3e2e6b44be5903f11b3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s10726-015-9454-6$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10726-015-9454-6$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925,41488,42557,51319</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Guler, Kemal</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bichler, Martin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Petrakis, Ioannis</creatorcontrib><title>Ascending Combinatorial Auctions with Risk Averse Bidders</title><title>Group decision and negotiation</title><addtitle>Group Decis Negot</addtitle><description>Ascending combinatorial auctions are being used in an increasing number of spectrum sales worldwide, as well as in other multi-item markets in procurement and logistics. Much research has focused on pricing and payment rules in such ascending auctions. However, recent game-theoretical research has shown that such auctions can even lead to inefficient perfect Bayesian equilibria with risk-neutral bidders. There is a fundamental free-rider problem without a simple solution, raising the question whether ascending combinatorial auctions can be expected to be efficient in the field. Risk aversion is arguably a significant driver of bidding behavior in high-stakes auctions. We analyze the impact of risk aversion on equilibrium bidding strategies and efficiency in a threshold problem with one global and several local bidders. Due to the underlying free-rider problem, the impact of risk-aversion on equilibrium bidding strategies of local bidders is not obvious. We characterize the necessary and sufficient conditions for the perfect Bayesian equilibria of the ascending auction mechanism to have the local bidders to drop at the reserve price. Interestingly, in spite of the free-riding opportunities of local bidders, risk-aversion reduces the scope of the non-bidding equilibrium. The results help explain the high efficiency of ascending combinatorial auctions observed in the lab.</description><subject>Auctions</subject><subject>Bids</subject><subject>Biological and Physical Anthropology</subject><subject>Business and Management</subject><subject>Combinatorics</subject><subject>Equilibrium</subject><subject>Game theory</subject><subject>Prices</subject><subject>Risk aversion</subject><subject>Spectrum allocation</subject><subject>Studies</subject><issn>0926-2644</issn><issn>1572-9907</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2016</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kE1LxDAQhoMouK7-AG8FL16qkzQfzbEufsGCIHoOaTpds3bbNekq_nsj9SCCpxmY530ZHkJOKVxQAHUZKSgmc6Ai11zwXO6RGRWK5VqD2icz0OnKJOeH5CjGNQAwAWpGdBUd9o3vV9li2NS-t-MQvO2yaudGP_Qx-_DjS_bo42tWvWOImF35pknLMTlobRfx5GfOyfPN9dPiLl8-3N4vqmXuOCvGHOuysZrZRlONtbMcZetEgQ6d1i23iBIaW3KGXGhbIENZc16j0FC0lNbFnJxPvdswvO0wjmbj089dZ3scdtHQUpVKcwk6oWd_0PWwC336zlBV0oIC0yJRdKJcGGIM2Jpt8BsbPg0F8y3TTDJNkmm-ZRqZMmzKxMT2Kwy_mv8NfQGce3bx</recordid><startdate>20160501</startdate><enddate>20160501</enddate><creator>Guler, Kemal</creator><creator>Bichler, Martin</creator><creator>Petrakis, Ioannis</creator><general>Springer Netherlands</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7WY</scope><scope>7WZ</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>87Z</scope><scope>88C</scope><scope>88G</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8FL</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BEZIV</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>FRNLG</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>F~G</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>JBE</scope><scope>K60</scope><scope>K6~</scope><scope>K8~</scope><scope>L.-</scope><scope>M0C</scope><scope>M0T</scope><scope>M2M</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>PQBIZ</scope><scope>PQBZA</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PSYQQ</scope><scope>Q9U</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20160501</creationdate><title>Ascending Combinatorial Auctions with Risk Averse Bidders</title><author>Guler, Kemal ; Bichler, Martin ; Petrakis, Ioannis</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c423t-eb8da92ad919ebca4e6fc53ecec99f4aee60da842e459a3e2e6b44be5903f11b3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2016</creationdate><topic>Auctions</topic><topic>Bids</topic><topic>Biological and Physical Anthropology</topic><topic>Business and Management</topic><topic>Combinatorics</topic><topic>Equilibrium</topic><topic>Game theory</topic><topic>Prices</topic><topic>Risk aversion</topic><topic>Spectrum allocation</topic><topic>Studies</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Guler, Kemal</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bichler, Martin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Petrakis, Ioannis</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (PDF only)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Healthcare Administration Database (Alumni)</collection><collection>Psychology Database (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Corporate)</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection</collection><collection>DELNET Management Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Advanced</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global</collection><collection>Healthcare Administration Database</collection><collection>Psychology Database</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>One Business (ProQuest)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest One Psychology</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><jtitle>Group decision and negotiation</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Guler, Kemal</au><au>Bichler, Martin</au><au>Petrakis, Ioannis</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Ascending Combinatorial Auctions with Risk Averse Bidders</atitle><jtitle>Group decision and negotiation</jtitle><stitle>Group Decis Negot</stitle><date>2016-05-01</date><risdate>2016</risdate><volume>25</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>609</spage><epage>639</epage><pages>609-639</pages><issn>0926-2644</issn><eissn>1572-9907</eissn><abstract>Ascending combinatorial auctions are being used in an increasing number of spectrum sales worldwide, as well as in other multi-item markets in procurement and logistics. Much research has focused on pricing and payment rules in such ascending auctions. However, recent game-theoretical research has shown that such auctions can even lead to inefficient perfect Bayesian equilibria with risk-neutral bidders. There is a fundamental free-rider problem without a simple solution, raising the question whether ascending combinatorial auctions can be expected to be efficient in the field. Risk aversion is arguably a significant driver of bidding behavior in high-stakes auctions. We analyze the impact of risk aversion on equilibrium bidding strategies and efficiency in a threshold problem with one global and several local bidders. Due to the underlying free-rider problem, the impact of risk-aversion on equilibrium bidding strategies of local bidders is not obvious. We characterize the necessary and sufficient conditions for the perfect Bayesian equilibria of the ascending auction mechanism to have the local bidders to drop at the reserve price. Interestingly, in spite of the free-riding opportunities of local bidders, risk-aversion reduces the scope of the non-bidding equilibrium. The results help explain the high efficiency of ascending combinatorial auctions observed in the lab.</abstract><cop>Dordrecht</cop><pub>Springer Netherlands</pub><doi>10.1007/s10726-015-9454-6</doi><tpages>31</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0926-2644
ispartof Group decision and negotiation, 2016-05, Vol.25 (3), p.609-639
issn 0926-2644
1572-9907
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1878794609
source EBSCOhost Business Source Complete; SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings
subjects Auctions
Bids
Biological and Physical Anthropology
Business and Management
Combinatorics
Equilibrium
Game theory
Prices
Risk aversion
Spectrum allocation
Studies
title Ascending Combinatorial Auctions with Risk Averse Bidders
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-07T10%3A22%3A50IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Ascending%20Combinatorial%20Auctions%20with%20Risk%20Averse%20Bidders&rft.jtitle=Group%20decision%20and%20negotiation&rft.au=Guler,%20Kemal&rft.date=2016-05-01&rft.volume=25&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=609&rft.epage=639&rft.pages=609-639&rft.issn=0926-2644&rft.eissn=1572-9907&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s10726-015-9454-6&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E4024262161%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1781310295&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true