Public Goods and Regime Support in Urban China

Why do authoritarian regimes try to improve the quality of their governance? In the absence of democratic institutions to monitor, reward and punish their performance, authoritarian politicians are normally expected to seek their self-interest through corruption and rewards to cronies, rather than p...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:The China quarterly (London) 2016-12, Vol.228 (228), p.859-880
Hauptverfasser: Dickson, Bruce J., Landry, Pierre F., Shen, Mingming, Yan, Jie
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 880
container_issue 228
container_start_page 859
container_title The China quarterly (London)
container_volume 228
creator Dickson, Bruce J.
Landry, Pierre F.
Shen, Mingming
Yan, Jie
description Why do authoritarian regimes try to improve the quality of their governance? In the absence of democratic institutions to monitor, reward and punish their performance, authoritarian politicians are normally expected to seek their self-interest through corruption and rewards to cronies, rather than providing for the public welfare. However, the Chinese state has actively promoted improved governance in recent years, with greater attention to quality of life issues to balance the primary focus on sustaining rapid economic growth. This paper analyses intra-national variation in the provision of public goods in urban China and the impact of public goods on regime support. Does better governance lead to higher levels of public support for the regime, even in the absence of democratic elections? Our evidence suggests that it does, with a greater impact for the local level than for the centre. 为什么威权政府要提高其治理水平? 由于缺乏民主的监督, 奖励和处罚机制, 威权政府往往倾向于通过腐败和奖励裙带的方式来获取自身利益, 而不是提高公共福利。然而, 近些年, 中国政府却积极地提升其政府治理水平, 中国政府将更多的注意力从关注经济持续快速增长转移到了民生问题。本文分析了中国城市公共产品供给在国内的变化情况及公共产品提供对制度支持的影响。即使在没有民主选举的情况下, 更好的政府治理能够带来对制度的更多支持吗? 我们的研究表明, 高的治理水平能带来对制度更高的支持水平。这种影响机制在对地方政府的支持方面的影响比对中央政府更大。
doi_str_mv 10.1017/S0305741016001156
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>jstor_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1878793700</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><cupid>10_1017_S0305741016001156</cupid><jstor_id>26291580</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>26291580</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c453t-cbcb367048a1c4c144d7eb428567de7e22c9cdab921fd20a61d1f14acdbd91d63</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kEtLw0AUhQdRsFZ_gAsh4MZN6tzJPJKlFK1CQbF2HeaVmpJk4kyy8N-bkCKiuLoX7nfOuRyELgEvAIO43eAEM0GHnWMMwPgRmgHlaUw4TY_RbDzH4_0UnYWwHxjCgM_Q4qVXVamjlXMmRLIx0avdlbWNNn3bOt9FZRNtvZJNtHwvG3mOTgpZBXtxmHO0fbh_Wz7G6-fV0_JuHWvKki7WSquEC0xTCZpqoNQIqyhJGRfGCkuIzrSRKiNQGIIlBwMFUKmNMhkYnszRzeTbevfR29DldRm0rSrZWNeHHFKRiiwRGA_o9S9073rfDN8NFKNYEMKygYKJ0t6F4G2Rt76spf_MAedjg_mfBgfN1aTZh875bwHhJAOWjsnJwVPWypdmZ39E_-v6BZ4veYQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1854072259</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Public Goods and Regime Support in Urban China</title><source>Worldwide Political Science Abstracts</source><source>HeinOnline Law Journal Library</source><source>Jstor Complete Legacy</source><source>Cambridge University Press Journals Complete</source><creator>Dickson, Bruce J. ; Landry, Pierre F. ; Shen, Mingming ; Yan, Jie</creator><creatorcontrib>Dickson, Bruce J. ; Landry, Pierre F. ; Shen, Mingming ; Yan, Jie</creatorcontrib><description>Why do authoritarian regimes try to improve the quality of their governance? In the absence of democratic institutions to monitor, reward and punish their performance, authoritarian politicians are normally expected to seek their self-interest through corruption and rewards to cronies, rather than providing for the public welfare. However, the Chinese state has actively promoted improved governance in recent years, with greater attention to quality of life issues to balance the primary focus on sustaining rapid economic growth. This paper analyses intra-national variation in the provision of public goods in urban China and the impact of public goods on regime support. Does better governance lead to higher levels of public support for the regime, even in the absence of democratic elections? Our evidence suggests that it does, with a greater impact for the local level than for the centre. 为什么威权政府要提高其治理水平? 由于缺乏民主的监督, 奖励和处罚机制, 威权政府往往倾向于通过腐败和奖励裙带的方式来获取自身利益, 而不是提高公共福利。然而, 近些年, 中国政府却积极地提升其政府治理水平, 中国政府将更多的注意力从关注经济持续快速增长转移到了民生问题。本文分析了中国城市公共产品供给在国内的变化情况及公共产品提供对制度支持的影响。即使在没有民主选举的情况下, 更好的政府治理能够带来对制度的更多支持吗? 我们的研究表明, 高的治理水平能带来对制度更高的支持水平。这种影响机制在对地方政府的支持方面的影响比对中央政府更大。</description><identifier>ISSN: 0305-7410</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1468-2648</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1017/S0305741016001156</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press</publisher><subject>Authoritarianism ; China ; Chinese languages ; Corruption ; Economic development ; Economic growth ; Elections ; Governance ; International organizations ; Legitimacy ; Perceptions ; Political science ; Politicians ; Politics ; Polls &amp; surveys ; Public administration ; Public good ; Public goods ; Public opinion ; Quality of life ; Reinforcement ; Rewards ; State-society relations ; Urban areas ; Welfare</subject><ispartof>The China quarterly (London), 2016-12, Vol.228 (228), p.859-880</ispartof><rights>Copyright © The China Quarterly 2016</rights><rights>The China Quarterly, 2016</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c453t-cbcb367048a1c4c144d7eb428567de7e22c9cdab921fd20a61d1f14acdbd91d63</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c453t-cbcb367048a1c4c144d7eb428567de7e22c9cdab921fd20a61d1f14acdbd91d63</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/26291580$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S0305741016001156/type/journal_article$$EHTML$$P50$$Gcambridge$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>164,314,777,781,800,12826,27905,27906,55609,57998,58231</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Dickson, Bruce J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Landry, Pierre F.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shen, Mingming</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yan, Jie</creatorcontrib><title>Public Goods and Regime Support in Urban China</title><title>The China quarterly (London)</title><addtitle>The China Quarterly</addtitle><description>Why do authoritarian regimes try to improve the quality of their governance? In the absence of democratic institutions to monitor, reward and punish their performance, authoritarian politicians are normally expected to seek their self-interest through corruption and rewards to cronies, rather than providing for the public welfare. However, the Chinese state has actively promoted improved governance in recent years, with greater attention to quality of life issues to balance the primary focus on sustaining rapid economic growth. This paper analyses intra-national variation in the provision of public goods in urban China and the impact of public goods on regime support. Does better governance lead to higher levels of public support for the regime, even in the absence of democratic elections? Our evidence suggests that it does, with a greater impact for the local level than for the centre. 为什么威权政府要提高其治理水平? 由于缺乏民主的监督, 奖励和处罚机制, 威权政府往往倾向于通过腐败和奖励裙带的方式来获取自身利益, 而不是提高公共福利。然而, 近些年, 中国政府却积极地提升其政府治理水平, 中国政府将更多的注意力从关注经济持续快速增长转移到了民生问题。本文分析了中国城市公共产品供给在国内的变化情况及公共产品提供对制度支持的影响。即使在没有民主选举的情况下, 更好的政府治理能够带来对制度的更多支持吗? 我们的研究表明, 高的治理水平能带来对制度更高的支持水平。这种影响机制在对地方政府的支持方面的影响比对中央政府更大。</description><subject>Authoritarianism</subject><subject>China</subject><subject>Chinese languages</subject><subject>Corruption</subject><subject>Economic development</subject><subject>Economic growth</subject><subject>Elections</subject><subject>Governance</subject><subject>International organizations</subject><subject>Legitimacy</subject><subject>Perceptions</subject><subject>Political science</subject><subject>Politicians</subject><subject>Politics</subject><subject>Polls &amp; surveys</subject><subject>Public administration</subject><subject>Public good</subject><subject>Public goods</subject><subject>Public opinion</subject><subject>Quality of life</subject><subject>Reinforcement</subject><subject>Rewards</subject><subject>State-society relations</subject><subject>Urban areas</subject><subject>Welfare</subject><issn>0305-7410</issn><issn>1468-2648</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2016</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7UB</sourceid><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AIMQZ</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><sourceid>PQHSC</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kEtLw0AUhQdRsFZ_gAsh4MZN6tzJPJKlFK1CQbF2HeaVmpJk4kyy8N-bkCKiuLoX7nfOuRyELgEvAIO43eAEM0GHnWMMwPgRmgHlaUw4TY_RbDzH4_0UnYWwHxjCgM_Q4qVXVamjlXMmRLIx0avdlbWNNn3bOt9FZRNtvZJNtHwvG3mOTgpZBXtxmHO0fbh_Wz7G6-fV0_JuHWvKki7WSquEC0xTCZpqoNQIqyhJGRfGCkuIzrSRKiNQGIIlBwMFUKmNMhkYnszRzeTbevfR29DldRm0rSrZWNeHHFKRiiwRGA_o9S9073rfDN8NFKNYEMKygYKJ0t6F4G2Rt76spf_MAedjg_mfBgfN1aTZh875bwHhJAOWjsnJwVPWypdmZ39E_-v6BZ4veYQ</recordid><startdate>201612</startdate><enddate>201612</enddate><creator>Dickson, Bruce J.</creator><creator>Landry, Pierre F.</creator><creator>Shen, Mingming</creator><creator>Yan, Jie</creator><general>Cambridge University Press</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>0-V</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7RO</scope><scope>7UB</scope><scope>7WY</scope><scope>7WZ</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>87Z</scope><scope>88J</scope><scope>8AI</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8FL</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AIMQZ</scope><scope>ALSLI</scope><scope>AXJJW</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BEZIV</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DPSOV</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>FREBS</scope><scope>FRNLG</scope><scope>F~G</scope><scope>GB0</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>JBE</scope><scope>K60</scope><scope>K6~</scope><scope>KC-</scope><scope>L.-</scope><scope>LIQON</scope><scope>M0C</scope><scope>M2L</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>M2R</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>PQBIZ</scope><scope>PQBZA</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQHSC</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>S0X</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201612</creationdate><title>Public Goods and Regime Support in Urban China</title><author>Dickson, Bruce J. ; Landry, Pierre F. ; Shen, Mingming ; Yan, Jie</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c453t-cbcb367048a1c4c144d7eb428567de7e22c9cdab921fd20a61d1f14acdbd91d63</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2016</creationdate><topic>Authoritarianism</topic><topic>China</topic><topic>Chinese languages</topic><topic>Corruption</topic><topic>Economic development</topic><topic>Economic growth</topic><topic>Elections</topic><topic>Governance</topic><topic>International organizations</topic><topic>Legitimacy</topic><topic>Perceptions</topic><topic>Political science</topic><topic>Politicians</topic><topic>Politics</topic><topic>Polls &amp; surveys</topic><topic>Public administration</topic><topic>Public good</topic><topic>Public goods</topic><topic>Public opinion</topic><topic>Quality of life</topic><topic>Reinforcement</topic><topic>Rewards</topic><topic>State-society relations</topic><topic>Urban areas</topic><topic>Welfare</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Dickson, Bruce J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Landry, Pierre F.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shen, Mingming</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yan, Jie</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Social Sciences Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Asian Business Database</collection><collection>Worldwide Political Science Abstracts</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (PDF only)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Social Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Asian Business Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest One Literature</collection><collection>Social Science Premium Collection</collection><collection>Asian &amp; European Business Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Politics Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>Asian &amp; European Business Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Corporate)</collection><collection>DELNET Social Sciences &amp; Humanities Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Politics Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Advanced</collection><collection>ProQuest One Literature - U.S. Customers Only</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global</collection><collection>Political Science Database</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Social Science Database</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>History Study Center</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>SIRS Editorial</collection><jtitle>The China quarterly (London)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Dickson, Bruce J.</au><au>Landry, Pierre F.</au><au>Shen, Mingming</au><au>Yan, Jie</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Public Goods and Regime Support in Urban China</atitle><jtitle>The China quarterly (London)</jtitle><addtitle>The China Quarterly</addtitle><date>2016-12</date><risdate>2016</risdate><volume>228</volume><issue>228</issue><spage>859</spage><epage>880</epage><pages>859-880</pages><issn>0305-7410</issn><eissn>1468-2648</eissn><abstract>Why do authoritarian regimes try to improve the quality of their governance? In the absence of democratic institutions to monitor, reward and punish their performance, authoritarian politicians are normally expected to seek their self-interest through corruption and rewards to cronies, rather than providing for the public welfare. However, the Chinese state has actively promoted improved governance in recent years, with greater attention to quality of life issues to balance the primary focus on sustaining rapid economic growth. This paper analyses intra-national variation in the provision of public goods in urban China and the impact of public goods on regime support. Does better governance lead to higher levels of public support for the regime, even in the absence of democratic elections? Our evidence suggests that it does, with a greater impact for the local level than for the centre. 为什么威权政府要提高其治理水平? 由于缺乏民主的监督, 奖励和处罚机制, 威权政府往往倾向于通过腐败和奖励裙带的方式来获取自身利益, 而不是提高公共福利。然而, 近些年, 中国政府却积极地提升其政府治理水平, 中国政府将更多的注意力从关注经济持续快速增长转移到了民生问题。本文分析了中国城市公共产品供给在国内的变化情况及公共产品提供对制度支持的影响。即使在没有民主选举的情况下, 更好的政府治理能够带来对制度的更多支持吗? 我们的研究表明, 高的治理水平能带来对制度更高的支持水平。这种影响机制在对地方政府的支持方面的影响比对中央政府更大。</abstract><cop>Cambridge, UK</cop><pub>Cambridge University Press</pub><doi>10.1017/S0305741016001156</doi><tpages>22</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0305-7410
ispartof The China quarterly (London), 2016-12, Vol.228 (228), p.859-880
issn 0305-7410
1468-2648
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1878793700
source Worldwide Political Science Abstracts; HeinOnline Law Journal Library; Jstor Complete Legacy; Cambridge University Press Journals Complete
subjects Authoritarianism
China
Chinese languages
Corruption
Economic development
Economic growth
Elections
Governance
International organizations
Legitimacy
Perceptions
Political science
Politicians
Politics
Polls & surveys
Public administration
Public good
Public goods
Public opinion
Quality of life
Reinforcement
Rewards
State-society relations
Urban areas
Welfare
title Public Goods and Regime Support in Urban China
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-20T19%3A05%3A55IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Public%20Goods%20and%20Regime%20Support%20in%20Urban%20China&rft.jtitle=The%20China%20quarterly%20(London)&rft.au=Dickson,%20Bruce%20J.&rft.date=2016-12&rft.volume=228&rft.issue=228&rft.spage=859&rft.epage=880&rft.pages=859-880&rft.issn=0305-7410&rft.eissn=1468-2648&rft_id=info:doi/10.1017/S0305741016001156&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_proqu%3E26291580%3C/jstor_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1854072259&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_cupid=10_1017_S0305741016001156&rft_jstor_id=26291580&rfr_iscdi=true