Market Reactions to the First-Time Disclosure of Corporate Social Responsibility Reports: Evidence from China
We examine whether investors value the disclosure of first-time standalone corporate social responsibility (CSR) reports, and whether market valuations differ between government-controlled and privately controlled firms. Using a matched sample of Chinese publicly listed firms, we find that CSR initi...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of business ethics 2016-11, Vol.138 (4), p.661-682 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 682 |
---|---|
container_issue | 4 |
container_start_page | 661 |
container_title | Journal of business ethics |
container_volume | 138 |
creator | Wang, Kun Tracy Li, Dejia |
description | We examine whether investors value the disclosure of first-time standalone corporate social responsibility (CSR) reports, and whether market valuations differ between government-controlled and privately controlled firms. Using a matched sample of Chinese publicly listed firms, we find that CSR initiators have higher market valuations than matched CSR non-initiators, and CSR initiators controlled by the central and local governments have lower market valuations than CSR non-initiators and CSR initiators controlled by private shareholders. Additional analyses demonstrate that CSR initiators with high CSR reporting quality and perceived credibility have higher market valuations than CSR initiators with low CSR reporting quality and medium or low perceived credibility of CSR reporting. We do not find convincing evidence that CSR mandate, litigation risk, and prior stock returns affect market reactions to CSR reporting. Overall, we find that the market values standalone CSR reports, and that CSR reporting quality and perceived credibility are important factors in market valuation. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1007/s10551-015-2775-1 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>jstor_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1878789786</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>45093229</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>45093229</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c402t-342be01c7fb2f1a80489d2b92fd3e8f854afed8e1f35550150f895ac3b33140c3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kU2LFDEQhoMoOK7-AA9CwIuXaCofk7Q3GXdVWBF0PYd0puJm7O6MSUbYf2-GFhEPJocQ8jyVKl5CngJ_CZybVxW41sA4aCaM0QzukQ1oIxnfDuY-2XDYGqa0Ug_Jo1oPvC8NakPmj758x0Y_ow8t5aXSlmm7RXqVSm3sJs1I36YaplxPBWmOdJfLMRffkH7JIfmpq_XYxTSmKbW7fu3Prb6mlz_THpeANJY8091tWvxj8iD6qeKT3-cF-Xp1ebN7z64_vfuwe3PNguKiManEiByCiaOI4C1XdtiLcRBxL9FGq5WPuLcIUWqt-8w82kH7IEcpQfEgL8iLte6x5B8nrM3NfQacJr9gPlUH1vQ9GLvt6PN_0EM-laV31ylhhZJGQKdgpULJtRaM7ljS7MudA-7OAbg1ANebcecA3NkRq1M7u3zD8lfl_0jPVulQWy5_flGaD1KIQf4CSoCSBg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1828243721</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Market Reactions to the First-Time Disclosure of Corporate Social Responsibility Reports: Evidence from China</title><source>PAIS Index</source><source>SpringerLink Journals</source><source>EBSCOhost Business Source Complete</source><source>Jstor Complete Legacy</source><source>EBSCOhost Education Source</source><creator>Wang, Kun Tracy ; Li, Dejia</creator><creatorcontrib>Wang, Kun Tracy ; Li, Dejia</creatorcontrib><description>We examine whether investors value the disclosure of first-time standalone corporate social responsibility (CSR) reports, and whether market valuations differ between government-controlled and privately controlled firms. Using a matched sample of Chinese publicly listed firms, we find that CSR initiators have higher market valuations than matched CSR non-initiators, and CSR initiators controlled by the central and local governments have lower market valuations than CSR non-initiators and CSR initiators controlled by private shareholders. Additional analyses demonstrate that CSR initiators with high CSR reporting quality and perceived credibility have higher market valuations than CSR initiators with low CSR reporting quality and medium or low perceived credibility of CSR reporting. We do not find convincing evidence that CSR mandate, litigation risk, and prior stock returns affect market reactions to CSR reporting. Overall, we find that the market values standalone CSR reports, and that CSR reporting quality and perceived credibility are important factors in market valuation.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0167-4544</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1573-0697</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s10551-015-2775-1</identifier><identifier>CODEN: JBUEDJ</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Dordrecht: Springer</publisher><subject>Annual reports ; Business and Management ; Business Ethics ; Capital markets ; China ; Comparative analysis ; Credibility ; Disclosure ; Disclosure of information ; Education ; Ethics ; Investments ; Investors ; Litigation ; Management ; Market economies ; Market value ; Ownership ; Perceptions ; Philosophy ; Private sector ; Public enterprise ; Public enterprises ; Quality of Life Research ; Risk ; Social responsibility ; Stakeholders ; Stock exchanges ; Stockholders ; Studies ; Valuation ; Values</subject><ispartof>Journal of business ethics, 2016-11, Vol.138 (4), p.661-682</ispartof><rights>Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2015</rights><rights>Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2016</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c402t-342be01c7fb2f1a80489d2b92fd3e8f854afed8e1f35550150f895ac3b33140c3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c402t-342be01c7fb2f1a80489d2b92fd3e8f854afed8e1f35550150f895ac3b33140c3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/45093229$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/45093229$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,803,27866,27924,27925,41488,42557,51319,58017,58250</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Wang, Kun Tracy</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Li, Dejia</creatorcontrib><title>Market Reactions to the First-Time Disclosure of Corporate Social Responsibility Reports: Evidence from China</title><title>Journal of business ethics</title><addtitle>J Bus Ethics</addtitle><description>We examine whether investors value the disclosure of first-time standalone corporate social responsibility (CSR) reports, and whether market valuations differ between government-controlled and privately controlled firms. Using a matched sample of Chinese publicly listed firms, we find that CSR initiators have higher market valuations than matched CSR non-initiators, and CSR initiators controlled by the central and local governments have lower market valuations than CSR non-initiators and CSR initiators controlled by private shareholders. Additional analyses demonstrate that CSR initiators with high CSR reporting quality and perceived credibility have higher market valuations than CSR initiators with low CSR reporting quality and medium or low perceived credibility of CSR reporting. We do not find convincing evidence that CSR mandate, litigation risk, and prior stock returns affect market reactions to CSR reporting. Overall, we find that the market values standalone CSR reports, and that CSR reporting quality and perceived credibility are important factors in market valuation.</description><subject>Annual reports</subject><subject>Business and Management</subject><subject>Business Ethics</subject><subject>Capital markets</subject><subject>China</subject><subject>Comparative analysis</subject><subject>Credibility</subject><subject>Disclosure</subject><subject>Disclosure of information</subject><subject>Education</subject><subject>Ethics</subject><subject>Investments</subject><subject>Investors</subject><subject>Litigation</subject><subject>Management</subject><subject>Market economies</subject><subject>Market value</subject><subject>Ownership</subject><subject>Perceptions</subject><subject>Philosophy</subject><subject>Private sector</subject><subject>Public enterprise</subject><subject>Public enterprises</subject><subject>Quality of Life Research</subject><subject>Risk</subject><subject>Social responsibility</subject><subject>Stakeholders</subject><subject>Stock exchanges</subject><subject>Stockholders</subject><subject>Studies</subject><subject>Valuation</subject><subject>Values</subject><issn>0167-4544</issn><issn>1573-0697</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2016</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7TQ</sourceid><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AVQMV</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>K50</sourceid><sourceid>M1D</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kU2LFDEQhoMoOK7-AA9CwIuXaCofk7Q3GXdVWBF0PYd0puJm7O6MSUbYf2-GFhEPJocQ8jyVKl5CngJ_CZybVxW41sA4aCaM0QzukQ1oIxnfDuY-2XDYGqa0Ug_Jo1oPvC8NakPmj758x0Y_ow8t5aXSlmm7RXqVSm3sJs1I36YaplxPBWmOdJfLMRffkH7JIfmpq_XYxTSmKbW7fu3Prb6mlz_THpeANJY8091tWvxj8iD6qeKT3-cF-Xp1ebN7z64_vfuwe3PNguKiManEiByCiaOI4C1XdtiLcRBxL9FGq5WPuLcIUWqt-8w82kH7IEcpQfEgL8iLte6x5B8nrM3NfQacJr9gPlUH1vQ9GLvt6PN_0EM-laV31ylhhZJGQKdgpULJtRaM7ljS7MudA-7OAbg1ANebcecA3NkRq1M7u3zD8lfl_0jPVulQWy5_flGaD1KIQf4CSoCSBg</recordid><startdate>20161101</startdate><enddate>20161101</enddate><creator>Wang, Kun Tracy</creator><creator>Li, Dejia</creator><general>Springer</general><general>Springer Netherlands</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>0-V</scope><scope>0U~</scope><scope>1-H</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7TQ</scope><scope>7WY</scope><scope>7WZ</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>87Z</scope><scope>88C</scope><scope>88G</scope><scope>88J</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8FL</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>AABKS</scope><scope>ABSDQ</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ALSLI</scope><scope>AVQMV</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BEZIV</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DHY</scope><scope>DON</scope><scope>DPSOV</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>FRNLG</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>F~G</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>JBE</scope><scope>K50</scope><scope>K60</scope><scope>K6~</scope><scope>K8~</scope><scope>KC-</scope><scope>L.-</scope><scope>L.0</scope><scope>M0C</scope><scope>M0T</scope><scope>M1D</scope><scope>M2L</scope><scope>M2M</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>M2R</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>PQBIZ</scope><scope>PQBZA</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PSYQQ</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>S0X</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20161101</creationdate><title>Market Reactions to the First-Time Disclosure of Corporate Social Responsibility Reports: Evidence from China</title><author>Wang, Kun Tracy ; Li, Dejia</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c402t-342be01c7fb2f1a80489d2b92fd3e8f854afed8e1f35550150f895ac3b33140c3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2016</creationdate><topic>Annual reports</topic><topic>Business and Management</topic><topic>Business Ethics</topic><topic>Capital markets</topic><topic>China</topic><topic>Comparative analysis</topic><topic>Credibility</topic><topic>Disclosure</topic><topic>Disclosure of information</topic><topic>Education</topic><topic>Ethics</topic><topic>Investments</topic><topic>Investors</topic><topic>Litigation</topic><topic>Management</topic><topic>Market economies</topic><topic>Market value</topic><topic>Ownership</topic><topic>Perceptions</topic><topic>Philosophy</topic><topic>Private sector</topic><topic>Public enterprise</topic><topic>Public enterprises</topic><topic>Quality of Life Research</topic><topic>Risk</topic><topic>Social responsibility</topic><topic>Stakeholders</topic><topic>Stock exchanges</topic><topic>Stockholders</topic><topic>Studies</topic><topic>Valuation</topic><topic>Values</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Wang, Kun Tracy</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Li, Dejia</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Social Sciences Premium Collection</collection><collection>Global News & ABI/Inform Professional</collection><collection>Trade PRO</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>PAIS Index</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (PDF only)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Healthcare Administration Database (Alumni)</collection><collection>Psychology Database (Alumni)</collection><collection>Social Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Philosophy Collection</collection><collection>Philosophy Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Social Science Premium Collection</collection><collection>Arts Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>PAIS International</collection><collection>PAIS International (Ovid)</collection><collection>Politics Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Corporate)</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>Art, Design & Architecture Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection</collection><collection>DELNET Management Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Politics Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Advanced</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Standard</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global</collection><collection>Healthcare Administration Database</collection><collection>Arts & Humanities Database</collection><collection>Political Science Database</collection><collection>Psychology Database</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Social Science Database</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest One Psychology</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>SIRS Editorial</collection><jtitle>Journal of business ethics</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Wang, Kun Tracy</au><au>Li, Dejia</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Market Reactions to the First-Time Disclosure of Corporate Social Responsibility Reports: Evidence from China</atitle><jtitle>Journal of business ethics</jtitle><stitle>J Bus Ethics</stitle><date>2016-11-01</date><risdate>2016</risdate><volume>138</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>661</spage><epage>682</epage><pages>661-682</pages><issn>0167-4544</issn><eissn>1573-0697</eissn><coden>JBUEDJ</coden><abstract>We examine whether investors value the disclosure of first-time standalone corporate social responsibility (CSR) reports, and whether market valuations differ between government-controlled and privately controlled firms. Using a matched sample of Chinese publicly listed firms, we find that CSR initiators have higher market valuations than matched CSR non-initiators, and CSR initiators controlled by the central and local governments have lower market valuations than CSR non-initiators and CSR initiators controlled by private shareholders. Additional analyses demonstrate that CSR initiators with high CSR reporting quality and perceived credibility have higher market valuations than CSR initiators with low CSR reporting quality and medium or low perceived credibility of CSR reporting. We do not find convincing evidence that CSR mandate, litigation risk, and prior stock returns affect market reactions to CSR reporting. Overall, we find that the market values standalone CSR reports, and that CSR reporting quality and perceived credibility are important factors in market valuation.</abstract><cop>Dordrecht</cop><pub>Springer</pub><doi>10.1007/s10551-015-2775-1</doi><tpages>22</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0167-4544 |
ispartof | Journal of business ethics, 2016-11, Vol.138 (4), p.661-682 |
issn | 0167-4544 1573-0697 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1878789786 |
source | PAIS Index; SpringerLink Journals; EBSCOhost Business Source Complete; Jstor Complete Legacy; EBSCOhost Education Source |
subjects | Annual reports Business and Management Business Ethics Capital markets China Comparative analysis Credibility Disclosure Disclosure of information Education Ethics Investments Investors Litigation Management Market economies Market value Ownership Perceptions Philosophy Private sector Public enterprise Public enterprises Quality of Life Research Risk Social responsibility Stakeholders Stock exchanges Stockholders Studies Valuation Values |
title | Market Reactions to the First-Time Disclosure of Corporate Social Responsibility Reports: Evidence from China |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-03T11%3A19%3A30IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Market%20Reactions%20to%20the%20First-Time%20Disclosure%20of%20Corporate%20Social%20Responsibility%20Reports:%20Evidence%20from%20China&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20business%20ethics&rft.au=Wang,%20Kun%20Tracy&rft.date=2016-11-01&rft.volume=138&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=661&rft.epage=682&rft.pages=661-682&rft.issn=0167-4544&rft.eissn=1573-0697&rft.coden=JBUEDJ&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s10551-015-2775-1&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_proqu%3E45093229%3C/jstor_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1828243721&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_jstor_id=45093229&rfr_iscdi=true |