Market Reactions to the First-Time Disclosure of Corporate Social Responsibility Reports: Evidence from China

We examine whether investors value the disclosure of first-time standalone corporate social responsibility (CSR) reports, and whether market valuations differ between government-controlled and privately controlled firms. Using a matched sample of Chinese publicly listed firms, we find that CSR initi...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of business ethics 2016-11, Vol.138 (4), p.661-682
Hauptverfasser: Wang, Kun Tracy, Li, Dejia
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 682
container_issue 4
container_start_page 661
container_title Journal of business ethics
container_volume 138
creator Wang, Kun Tracy
Li, Dejia
description We examine whether investors value the disclosure of first-time standalone corporate social responsibility (CSR) reports, and whether market valuations differ between government-controlled and privately controlled firms. Using a matched sample of Chinese publicly listed firms, we find that CSR initiators have higher market valuations than matched CSR non-initiators, and CSR initiators controlled by the central and local governments have lower market valuations than CSR non-initiators and CSR initiators controlled by private shareholders. Additional analyses demonstrate that CSR initiators with high CSR reporting quality and perceived credibility have higher market valuations than CSR initiators with low CSR reporting quality and medium or low perceived credibility of CSR reporting. We do not find convincing evidence that CSR mandate, litigation risk, and prior stock returns affect market reactions to CSR reporting. Overall, we find that the market values standalone CSR reports, and that CSR reporting quality and perceived credibility are important factors in market valuation.
doi_str_mv 10.1007/s10551-015-2775-1
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>jstor_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1878789786</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>45093229</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>45093229</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c402t-342be01c7fb2f1a80489d2b92fd3e8f854afed8e1f35550150f895ac3b33140c3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kU2LFDEQhoMoOK7-AA9CwIuXaCofk7Q3GXdVWBF0PYd0puJm7O6MSUbYf2-GFhEPJocQ8jyVKl5CngJ_CZybVxW41sA4aCaM0QzukQ1oIxnfDuY-2XDYGqa0Ug_Jo1oPvC8NakPmj758x0Y_ow8t5aXSlmm7RXqVSm3sJs1I36YaplxPBWmOdJfLMRffkH7JIfmpq_XYxTSmKbW7fu3Prb6mlz_THpeANJY8091tWvxj8iD6qeKT3-cF-Xp1ebN7z64_vfuwe3PNguKiManEiByCiaOI4C1XdtiLcRBxL9FGq5WPuLcIUWqt-8w82kH7IEcpQfEgL8iLte6x5B8nrM3NfQacJr9gPlUH1vQ9GLvt6PN_0EM-laV31ylhhZJGQKdgpULJtRaM7ljS7MudA-7OAbg1ANebcecA3NkRq1M7u3zD8lfl_0jPVulQWy5_flGaD1KIQf4CSoCSBg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1828243721</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Market Reactions to the First-Time Disclosure of Corporate Social Responsibility Reports: Evidence from China</title><source>PAIS Index</source><source>SpringerLink Journals</source><source>EBSCOhost Business Source Complete</source><source>Jstor Complete Legacy</source><source>EBSCOhost Education Source</source><creator>Wang, Kun Tracy ; Li, Dejia</creator><creatorcontrib>Wang, Kun Tracy ; Li, Dejia</creatorcontrib><description>We examine whether investors value the disclosure of first-time standalone corporate social responsibility (CSR) reports, and whether market valuations differ between government-controlled and privately controlled firms. Using a matched sample of Chinese publicly listed firms, we find that CSR initiators have higher market valuations than matched CSR non-initiators, and CSR initiators controlled by the central and local governments have lower market valuations than CSR non-initiators and CSR initiators controlled by private shareholders. Additional analyses demonstrate that CSR initiators with high CSR reporting quality and perceived credibility have higher market valuations than CSR initiators with low CSR reporting quality and medium or low perceived credibility of CSR reporting. We do not find convincing evidence that CSR mandate, litigation risk, and prior stock returns affect market reactions to CSR reporting. Overall, we find that the market values standalone CSR reports, and that CSR reporting quality and perceived credibility are important factors in market valuation.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0167-4544</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1573-0697</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s10551-015-2775-1</identifier><identifier>CODEN: JBUEDJ</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Dordrecht: Springer</publisher><subject>Annual reports ; Business and Management ; Business Ethics ; Capital markets ; China ; Comparative analysis ; Credibility ; Disclosure ; Disclosure of information ; Education ; Ethics ; Investments ; Investors ; Litigation ; Management ; Market economies ; Market value ; Ownership ; Perceptions ; Philosophy ; Private sector ; Public enterprise ; Public enterprises ; Quality of Life Research ; Risk ; Social responsibility ; Stakeholders ; Stock exchanges ; Stockholders ; Studies ; Valuation ; Values</subject><ispartof>Journal of business ethics, 2016-11, Vol.138 (4), p.661-682</ispartof><rights>Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2015</rights><rights>Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2016</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c402t-342be01c7fb2f1a80489d2b92fd3e8f854afed8e1f35550150f895ac3b33140c3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c402t-342be01c7fb2f1a80489d2b92fd3e8f854afed8e1f35550150f895ac3b33140c3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/45093229$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/45093229$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,803,27866,27924,27925,41488,42557,51319,58017,58250</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Wang, Kun Tracy</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Li, Dejia</creatorcontrib><title>Market Reactions to the First-Time Disclosure of Corporate Social Responsibility Reports: Evidence from China</title><title>Journal of business ethics</title><addtitle>J Bus Ethics</addtitle><description>We examine whether investors value the disclosure of first-time standalone corporate social responsibility (CSR) reports, and whether market valuations differ between government-controlled and privately controlled firms. Using a matched sample of Chinese publicly listed firms, we find that CSR initiators have higher market valuations than matched CSR non-initiators, and CSR initiators controlled by the central and local governments have lower market valuations than CSR non-initiators and CSR initiators controlled by private shareholders. Additional analyses demonstrate that CSR initiators with high CSR reporting quality and perceived credibility have higher market valuations than CSR initiators with low CSR reporting quality and medium or low perceived credibility of CSR reporting. We do not find convincing evidence that CSR mandate, litigation risk, and prior stock returns affect market reactions to CSR reporting. Overall, we find that the market values standalone CSR reports, and that CSR reporting quality and perceived credibility are important factors in market valuation.</description><subject>Annual reports</subject><subject>Business and Management</subject><subject>Business Ethics</subject><subject>Capital markets</subject><subject>China</subject><subject>Comparative analysis</subject><subject>Credibility</subject><subject>Disclosure</subject><subject>Disclosure of information</subject><subject>Education</subject><subject>Ethics</subject><subject>Investments</subject><subject>Investors</subject><subject>Litigation</subject><subject>Management</subject><subject>Market economies</subject><subject>Market value</subject><subject>Ownership</subject><subject>Perceptions</subject><subject>Philosophy</subject><subject>Private sector</subject><subject>Public enterprise</subject><subject>Public enterprises</subject><subject>Quality of Life Research</subject><subject>Risk</subject><subject>Social responsibility</subject><subject>Stakeholders</subject><subject>Stock exchanges</subject><subject>Stockholders</subject><subject>Studies</subject><subject>Valuation</subject><subject>Values</subject><issn>0167-4544</issn><issn>1573-0697</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2016</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7TQ</sourceid><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AVQMV</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>K50</sourceid><sourceid>M1D</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kU2LFDEQhoMoOK7-AA9CwIuXaCofk7Q3GXdVWBF0PYd0puJm7O6MSUbYf2-GFhEPJocQ8jyVKl5CngJ_CZybVxW41sA4aCaM0QzukQ1oIxnfDuY-2XDYGqa0Ug_Jo1oPvC8NakPmj758x0Y_ow8t5aXSlmm7RXqVSm3sJs1I36YaplxPBWmOdJfLMRffkH7JIfmpq_XYxTSmKbW7fu3Prb6mlz_THpeANJY8091tWvxj8iD6qeKT3-cF-Xp1ebN7z64_vfuwe3PNguKiManEiByCiaOI4C1XdtiLcRBxL9FGq5WPuLcIUWqt-8w82kH7IEcpQfEgL8iLte6x5B8nrM3NfQacJr9gPlUH1vQ9GLvt6PN_0EM-laV31ylhhZJGQKdgpULJtRaM7ljS7MudA-7OAbg1ANebcecA3NkRq1M7u3zD8lfl_0jPVulQWy5_flGaD1KIQf4CSoCSBg</recordid><startdate>20161101</startdate><enddate>20161101</enddate><creator>Wang, Kun Tracy</creator><creator>Li, Dejia</creator><general>Springer</general><general>Springer Netherlands</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>0-V</scope><scope>0U~</scope><scope>1-H</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7TQ</scope><scope>7WY</scope><scope>7WZ</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>87Z</scope><scope>88C</scope><scope>88G</scope><scope>88J</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8FL</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>AABKS</scope><scope>ABSDQ</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ALSLI</scope><scope>AVQMV</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BEZIV</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DHY</scope><scope>DON</scope><scope>DPSOV</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>FRNLG</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>F~G</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>JBE</scope><scope>K50</scope><scope>K60</scope><scope>K6~</scope><scope>K8~</scope><scope>KC-</scope><scope>L.-</scope><scope>L.0</scope><scope>M0C</scope><scope>M0T</scope><scope>M1D</scope><scope>M2L</scope><scope>M2M</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>M2R</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>PQBIZ</scope><scope>PQBZA</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PSYQQ</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>S0X</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20161101</creationdate><title>Market Reactions to the First-Time Disclosure of Corporate Social Responsibility Reports: Evidence from China</title><author>Wang, Kun Tracy ; Li, Dejia</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c402t-342be01c7fb2f1a80489d2b92fd3e8f854afed8e1f35550150f895ac3b33140c3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2016</creationdate><topic>Annual reports</topic><topic>Business and Management</topic><topic>Business Ethics</topic><topic>Capital markets</topic><topic>China</topic><topic>Comparative analysis</topic><topic>Credibility</topic><topic>Disclosure</topic><topic>Disclosure of information</topic><topic>Education</topic><topic>Ethics</topic><topic>Investments</topic><topic>Investors</topic><topic>Litigation</topic><topic>Management</topic><topic>Market economies</topic><topic>Market value</topic><topic>Ownership</topic><topic>Perceptions</topic><topic>Philosophy</topic><topic>Private sector</topic><topic>Public enterprise</topic><topic>Public enterprises</topic><topic>Quality of Life Research</topic><topic>Risk</topic><topic>Social responsibility</topic><topic>Stakeholders</topic><topic>Stock exchanges</topic><topic>Stockholders</topic><topic>Studies</topic><topic>Valuation</topic><topic>Values</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Wang, Kun Tracy</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Li, Dejia</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Social Sciences Premium Collection</collection><collection>Global News &amp; ABI/Inform Professional</collection><collection>Trade PRO</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>PAIS Index</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (PDF only)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Healthcare Administration Database (Alumni)</collection><collection>Psychology Database (Alumni)</collection><collection>Social Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Philosophy Collection</collection><collection>Philosophy Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Social Science Premium Collection</collection><collection>Arts Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>PAIS International</collection><collection>PAIS International (Ovid)</collection><collection>Politics Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Corporate)</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>Art, Design &amp; Architecture Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection</collection><collection>DELNET Management Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Politics Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Advanced</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Standard</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global</collection><collection>Healthcare Administration Database</collection><collection>Arts &amp; Humanities Database</collection><collection>Political Science Database</collection><collection>Psychology Database</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Social Science Database</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest One Psychology</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>SIRS Editorial</collection><jtitle>Journal of business ethics</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Wang, Kun Tracy</au><au>Li, Dejia</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Market Reactions to the First-Time Disclosure of Corporate Social Responsibility Reports: Evidence from China</atitle><jtitle>Journal of business ethics</jtitle><stitle>J Bus Ethics</stitle><date>2016-11-01</date><risdate>2016</risdate><volume>138</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>661</spage><epage>682</epage><pages>661-682</pages><issn>0167-4544</issn><eissn>1573-0697</eissn><coden>JBUEDJ</coden><abstract>We examine whether investors value the disclosure of first-time standalone corporate social responsibility (CSR) reports, and whether market valuations differ between government-controlled and privately controlled firms. Using a matched sample of Chinese publicly listed firms, we find that CSR initiators have higher market valuations than matched CSR non-initiators, and CSR initiators controlled by the central and local governments have lower market valuations than CSR non-initiators and CSR initiators controlled by private shareholders. Additional analyses demonstrate that CSR initiators with high CSR reporting quality and perceived credibility have higher market valuations than CSR initiators with low CSR reporting quality and medium or low perceived credibility of CSR reporting. We do not find convincing evidence that CSR mandate, litigation risk, and prior stock returns affect market reactions to CSR reporting. Overall, we find that the market values standalone CSR reports, and that CSR reporting quality and perceived credibility are important factors in market valuation.</abstract><cop>Dordrecht</cop><pub>Springer</pub><doi>10.1007/s10551-015-2775-1</doi><tpages>22</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0167-4544
ispartof Journal of business ethics, 2016-11, Vol.138 (4), p.661-682
issn 0167-4544
1573-0697
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1878789786
source PAIS Index; SpringerLink Journals; EBSCOhost Business Source Complete; Jstor Complete Legacy; EBSCOhost Education Source
subjects Annual reports
Business and Management
Business Ethics
Capital markets
China
Comparative analysis
Credibility
Disclosure
Disclosure of information
Education
Ethics
Investments
Investors
Litigation
Management
Market economies
Market value
Ownership
Perceptions
Philosophy
Private sector
Public enterprise
Public enterprises
Quality of Life Research
Risk
Social responsibility
Stakeholders
Stock exchanges
Stockholders
Studies
Valuation
Values
title Market Reactions to the First-Time Disclosure of Corporate Social Responsibility Reports: Evidence from China
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-03T11%3A19%3A30IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Market%20Reactions%20to%20the%20First-Time%20Disclosure%20of%20Corporate%20Social%20Responsibility%20Reports:%20Evidence%20from%20China&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20business%20ethics&rft.au=Wang,%20Kun%20Tracy&rft.date=2016-11-01&rft.volume=138&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=661&rft.epage=682&rft.pages=661-682&rft.issn=0167-4544&rft.eissn=1573-0697&rft.coden=JBUEDJ&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s10551-015-2775-1&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_proqu%3E45093229%3C/jstor_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1828243721&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_jstor_id=45093229&rfr_iscdi=true