Conservation of biodiversity in coffee agroecosystems: a tri-taxa comparison in southern Mexico
We compare species richness of birds, fruit-feeding butterflies and ground-foraging ants along a coffee intensification gradient represented by a reduction in the number of species of shade trees and percentage of shade cover in coffee plantations. We sampled the three taxa in the same plots within...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Biodiversity and conservation 2003-06, Vol.12 (6), p.1239-1239 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 1239 |
---|---|
container_issue | 6 |
container_start_page | 1239 |
container_title | Biodiversity and conservation |
container_volume | 12 |
creator | Perfecto, Ivette Mas, Alexandre Dietsch, Thomas Vandermeer, John |
description | We compare species richness of birds, fruit-feeding butterflies and ground-foraging ants along a coffee intensification gradient represented by a reduction in the number of species of shade trees and percentage of shade cover in coffee plantations. We sampled the three taxa in the same plots within the same period of time. Two sites were selected in the Soconusco region of the state of Chiapas, Mexico. Within each site four habitat types were selected and within each habitat type four points were randomly selected. The habitat types were forest, rustic coffee, diverse shade coffee, and intensive coffee (low density of shade). We found different responses of the three taxa along the intensification gradient. While ants and butterflies generally decrease in species richness with the decrease of shade cover, birds declined in one site but increased in the other. Ant species richness appears to be more resistant to habitat modification, while butterfly species richness appears to be more sensitive. Bird species richness was correlated with distance from forest fragments but not with habitat type, suggesting that scale and landscape structure may be important for more mobile taxa. For each of these taxa, the rustic plantation was the one that maintained species richness most similar to the forest. We found no correlation between the three taxa, suggesting that none of these taxa are good candidates as surrogates for each other. We discuss the implications of these results for the conservation of biodiversity in coffee plantations, in particular, the importance of distinguishing between different levels of shade, and the possibility that different taxa might be responding to habitat changes at different spatial scales.[PUBLICATION ABSTRACT] |
doi_str_mv | 10.1023/a:1023039921916 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_18784680</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>14676224</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c400t-42ced79c86fc7cb272d53f890532e6e1a3ce9896e6e6381dfa347764610769233</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFzztPwzAUBWALgUQpzKwWA1vA10786IYqXlIRC8yR69yAqzYG26naf48RTCxM5w7fOdIl5BzYFTAuru3sO5gwhoMBeUAm0CheGQXskEyYkawSAM0xOUlpxRhTjYQJaedhSBi3Nvsw0NDTpQ-d32JMPu-pH6gLfY9I7VsM6ELap4ybNKOW5uirbHe2iM2HjT6VfvEpjPkd40CfcOddOCVHvV0nPPvNKXm9u32ZP1SL5_vH-c2icjVjuaq5w04Zp2XvlFtyxbtG9NqwRnCUCFY4NNrIckuhoeutqJWStQSmpOFCTMnlz-5HDJ8jptxufHK4XtsBw5ha0ErXUrP_YS2V5Lwu8OIPXIUxDuWJVjUggZdF8QWQCXEg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>751612878</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Conservation of biodiversity in coffee agroecosystems: a tri-taxa comparison in southern Mexico</title><source>SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings</source><creator>Perfecto, Ivette ; Mas, Alexandre ; Dietsch, Thomas ; Vandermeer, John</creator><creatorcontrib>Perfecto, Ivette ; Mas, Alexandre ; Dietsch, Thomas ; Vandermeer, John</creatorcontrib><description>We compare species richness of birds, fruit-feeding butterflies and ground-foraging ants along a coffee intensification gradient represented by a reduction in the number of species of shade trees and percentage of shade cover in coffee plantations. We sampled the three taxa in the same plots within the same period of time. Two sites were selected in the Soconusco region of the state of Chiapas, Mexico. Within each site four habitat types were selected and within each habitat type four points were randomly selected. The habitat types were forest, rustic coffee, diverse shade coffee, and intensive coffee (low density of shade). We found different responses of the three taxa along the intensification gradient. While ants and butterflies generally decrease in species richness with the decrease of shade cover, birds declined in one site but increased in the other. Ant species richness appears to be more resistant to habitat modification, while butterfly species richness appears to be more sensitive. Bird species richness was correlated with distance from forest fragments but not with habitat type, suggesting that scale and landscape structure may be important for more mobile taxa. For each of these taxa, the rustic plantation was the one that maintained species richness most similar to the forest. We found no correlation between the three taxa, suggesting that none of these taxa are good candidates as surrogates for each other. We discuss the implications of these results for the conservation of biodiversity in coffee plantations, in particular, the importance of distinguishing between different levels of shade, and the possibility that different taxa might be responding to habitat changes at different spatial scales.[PUBLICATION ABSTRACT]</description><identifier>ISSN: 0960-3115</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1572-9710</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1023/a:1023039921916</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Dordrecht: Springer Nature B.V</publisher><subject>Agricultural ecosystems ; Biodiversity ; Birds ; Coffee ; Conservation ; Habitat changes ; Habitats ; Plantations ; Species richness ; Taxa</subject><ispartof>Biodiversity and conservation, 2003-06, Vol.12 (6), p.1239-1239</ispartof><rights>Kluwer Academic Publishers 2003</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c400t-42ced79c86fc7cb272d53f890532e6e1a3ce9896e6e6381dfa347764610769233</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Perfecto, Ivette</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mas, Alexandre</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dietsch, Thomas</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vandermeer, John</creatorcontrib><title>Conservation of biodiversity in coffee agroecosystems: a tri-taxa comparison in southern Mexico</title><title>Biodiversity and conservation</title><description>We compare species richness of birds, fruit-feeding butterflies and ground-foraging ants along a coffee intensification gradient represented by a reduction in the number of species of shade trees and percentage of shade cover in coffee plantations. We sampled the three taxa in the same plots within the same period of time. Two sites were selected in the Soconusco region of the state of Chiapas, Mexico. Within each site four habitat types were selected and within each habitat type four points were randomly selected. The habitat types were forest, rustic coffee, diverse shade coffee, and intensive coffee (low density of shade). We found different responses of the three taxa along the intensification gradient. While ants and butterflies generally decrease in species richness with the decrease of shade cover, birds declined in one site but increased in the other. Ant species richness appears to be more resistant to habitat modification, while butterfly species richness appears to be more sensitive. Bird species richness was correlated with distance from forest fragments but not with habitat type, suggesting that scale and landscape structure may be important for more mobile taxa. For each of these taxa, the rustic plantation was the one that maintained species richness most similar to the forest. We found no correlation between the three taxa, suggesting that none of these taxa are good candidates as surrogates for each other. We discuss the implications of these results for the conservation of biodiversity in coffee plantations, in particular, the importance of distinguishing between different levels of shade, and the possibility that different taxa might be responding to habitat changes at different spatial scales.[PUBLICATION ABSTRACT]</description><subject>Agricultural ecosystems</subject><subject>Biodiversity</subject><subject>Birds</subject><subject>Coffee</subject><subject>Conservation</subject><subject>Habitat changes</subject><subject>Habitats</subject><subject>Plantations</subject><subject>Species richness</subject><subject>Taxa</subject><issn>0960-3115</issn><issn>1572-9710</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2003</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><recordid>eNqFzztPwzAUBWALgUQpzKwWA1vA10786IYqXlIRC8yR69yAqzYG26naf48RTCxM5w7fOdIl5BzYFTAuru3sO5gwhoMBeUAm0CheGQXskEyYkawSAM0xOUlpxRhTjYQJaedhSBi3Nvsw0NDTpQ-d32JMPu-pH6gLfY9I7VsM6ELap4ybNKOW5uirbHe2iM2HjT6VfvEpjPkd40CfcOddOCVHvV0nPPvNKXm9u32ZP1SL5_vH-c2icjVjuaq5w04Zp2XvlFtyxbtG9NqwRnCUCFY4NNrIckuhoeutqJWStQSmpOFCTMnlz-5HDJ8jptxufHK4XtsBw5ha0ErXUrP_YS2V5Lwu8OIPXIUxDuWJVjUggZdF8QWQCXEg</recordid><startdate>20030601</startdate><enddate>20030601</enddate><creator>Perfecto, Ivette</creator><creator>Mas, Alexandre</creator><creator>Dietsch, Thomas</creator><creator>Vandermeer, John</creator><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7SS</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7U6</scope><scope>7X2</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88I</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>BKSAR</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>H97</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>L.G</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0K</scope><scope>M2P</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PCBAR</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>RC3</scope><scope>SOI</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20030601</creationdate><title>Conservation of biodiversity in coffee agroecosystems: a tri-taxa comparison in southern Mexico</title><author>Perfecto, Ivette ; Mas, Alexandre ; Dietsch, Thomas ; Vandermeer, John</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c400t-42ced79c86fc7cb272d53f890532e6e1a3ce9896e6e6381dfa347764610769233</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2003</creationdate><topic>Agricultural ecosystems</topic><topic>Biodiversity</topic><topic>Birds</topic><topic>Coffee</topic><topic>Conservation</topic><topic>Habitat changes</topic><topic>Habitats</topic><topic>Plantations</topic><topic>Species richness</topic><topic>Taxa</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Perfecto, Ivette</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mas, Alexandre</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dietsch, Thomas</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vandermeer, John</creatorcontrib><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Entomology Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Sustainability Science Abstracts</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Agricultural & Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Earth, Atmospheric & Aquatic Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 3: Aquatic Pollution & Environmental Quality</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Database</collection><collection>Science Database</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>Earth, Atmospheric & Aquatic Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>Genetics Abstracts</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Biodiversity and conservation</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Perfecto, Ivette</au><au>Mas, Alexandre</au><au>Dietsch, Thomas</au><au>Vandermeer, John</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Conservation of biodiversity in coffee agroecosystems: a tri-taxa comparison in southern Mexico</atitle><jtitle>Biodiversity and conservation</jtitle><date>2003-06-01</date><risdate>2003</risdate><volume>12</volume><issue>6</issue><spage>1239</spage><epage>1239</epage><pages>1239-1239</pages><issn>0960-3115</issn><eissn>1572-9710</eissn><abstract>We compare species richness of birds, fruit-feeding butterflies and ground-foraging ants along a coffee intensification gradient represented by a reduction in the number of species of shade trees and percentage of shade cover in coffee plantations. We sampled the three taxa in the same plots within the same period of time. Two sites were selected in the Soconusco region of the state of Chiapas, Mexico. Within each site four habitat types were selected and within each habitat type four points were randomly selected. The habitat types were forest, rustic coffee, diverse shade coffee, and intensive coffee (low density of shade). We found different responses of the three taxa along the intensification gradient. While ants and butterflies generally decrease in species richness with the decrease of shade cover, birds declined in one site but increased in the other. Ant species richness appears to be more resistant to habitat modification, while butterfly species richness appears to be more sensitive. Bird species richness was correlated with distance from forest fragments but not with habitat type, suggesting that scale and landscape structure may be important for more mobile taxa. For each of these taxa, the rustic plantation was the one that maintained species richness most similar to the forest. We found no correlation between the three taxa, suggesting that none of these taxa are good candidates as surrogates for each other. We discuss the implications of these results for the conservation of biodiversity in coffee plantations, in particular, the importance of distinguishing between different levels of shade, and the possibility that different taxa might be responding to habitat changes at different spatial scales.[PUBLICATION ABSTRACT]</abstract><cop>Dordrecht</cop><pub>Springer Nature B.V</pub><doi>10.1023/a:1023039921916</doi><tpages>1</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0960-3115 |
ispartof | Biodiversity and conservation, 2003-06, Vol.12 (6), p.1239-1239 |
issn | 0960-3115 1572-9710 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_18784680 |
source | SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings |
subjects | Agricultural ecosystems Biodiversity Birds Coffee Conservation Habitat changes Habitats Plantations Species richness Taxa |
title | Conservation of biodiversity in coffee agroecosystems: a tri-taxa comparison in southern Mexico |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-29T15%3A48%3A34IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Conservation%20of%20biodiversity%20in%20coffee%20agroecosystems:%20a%20tri-taxa%20comparison%20in%20southern%20Mexico&rft.jtitle=Biodiversity%20and%20conservation&rft.au=Perfecto,%20Ivette&rft.date=2003-06-01&rft.volume=12&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=1239&rft.epage=1239&rft.pages=1239-1239&rft.issn=0960-3115&rft.eissn=1572-9710&rft_id=info:doi/10.1023/a:1023039921916&rft_dat=%3Cproquest%3E14676224%3C/proquest%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=751612878&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |