The enigma of inhaled salbutamol and sport: unresolved after 45 years

During the past 45 years, there have been more changes on the World Anti‐Doping Agency's (WADA) Prohibited List (the List) to the status of inhaled salbutamol than any other substance. With 658 athletes, 6.1% of all participating athletes approved to inhale salbutamol at the 2008 Beijing Games,...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Drug testing and analysis 2017-07, Vol.9 (7), p.977-982
1. Verfasser: Fitch, Ken D.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 982
container_issue 7
container_start_page 977
container_title Drug testing and analysis
container_volume 9
creator Fitch, Ken D.
description During the past 45 years, there have been more changes on the World Anti‐Doping Agency's (WADA) Prohibited List (the List) to the status of inhaled salbutamol than any other substance. With 658 athletes, 6.1% of all participating athletes approved to inhale salbutamol at the 2008 Beijing Games, it is one of the medications used most frequently by Olympic athletes. Nevertheless, since the 2008 Games, WADA has made numerous changes to inhaled salbutamol on the List including prohibiting its use, then a year later permitting it without prior notification and recommending a pharmacokinetic study if an athlete exceeds the urinary threshold of 1000 ng/mL. Recently, an elite athlete undertook two pharmacokinetic studies and the results have raised several questions. These include whether WADA should continue to permit nebulized salbutamol as an acceptable method of inhalation and there is some justification for nebulized salbutamol to be prohibited in sport. Another question is whether the modified advisory on salbutamol in the 2017 List appropriately informs athletes of the risks of exceeding the urinary threshold and the recent changes may not inform athletes optimally. Finally, concern is expressed at the persistent failure of WADA to apply a correction down to a specific gravity of 1.020 when an exogenous substance is identified in the urine of a dehydrated athlete. It is recommended that this should be implemented. Copyright © 2017 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. Changes in the status of inhaled salbutamol in sport are examined with recommendations for the future.
doi_str_mv 10.1002/dta.2184
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1877854265</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1877854265</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3604-67bc2235ddfd2fc9edfaa3c96aed6f3d97cc1a2ff00802ab075f852b66f3e7cf3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kEtOwzAQQC0EovwkToCyZJNiO4mdsKsKBaRKbMramthjGuQkxU5AvQ1n4WSkFMqKlceap6fRI-Sc0TGjlF-ZDsac5ekeOWJFymMpGNvfzTQZkeMQXigVKU-yQzLiOS_STMojMlssMcKmeq4ham1UNUtwaKIAruw7qFsXQTN8V63vrqO-8Rha9zYAYDv0UZp9fqwRfDglBxZcwLOf94Q8zW4X0_t4_nj3MJ3MY50ImsZClpoPJxhjDbe6QGMBEl0IQCNsYgqpNQNuLaU55VBSmdk846UYlii1TU7I5da78u1rj6FTdRU0OgcNtn1QLJcyz1Iusj9U-zYEj1atfFWDXytG1aaaGqqpTbUBvfix9mWNZgf-ZhqAeAu8Vw7X_4rUzWLyLfwCfFt3Bw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1877854265</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>The enigma of inhaled salbutamol and sport: unresolved after 45 years</title><source>Wiley Online Library - AutoHoldings Journals</source><source>MEDLINE</source><creator>Fitch, Ken D.</creator><creatorcontrib>Fitch, Ken D.</creatorcontrib><description>During the past 45 years, there have been more changes on the World Anti‐Doping Agency's (WADA) Prohibited List (the List) to the status of inhaled salbutamol than any other substance. With 658 athletes, 6.1% of all participating athletes approved to inhale salbutamol at the 2008 Beijing Games, it is one of the medications used most frequently by Olympic athletes. Nevertheless, since the 2008 Games, WADA has made numerous changes to inhaled salbutamol on the List including prohibiting its use, then a year later permitting it without prior notification and recommending a pharmacokinetic study if an athlete exceeds the urinary threshold of 1000 ng/mL. Recently, an elite athlete undertook two pharmacokinetic studies and the results have raised several questions. These include whether WADA should continue to permit nebulized salbutamol as an acceptable method of inhalation and there is some justification for nebulized salbutamol to be prohibited in sport. Another question is whether the modified advisory on salbutamol in the 2017 List appropriately informs athletes of the risks of exceeding the urinary threshold and the recent changes may not inform athletes optimally. Finally, concern is expressed at the persistent failure of WADA to apply a correction down to a specific gravity of 1.020 when an exogenous substance is identified in the urine of a dehydrated athlete. It is recommended that this should be implemented. Copyright © 2017 John Wiley &amp; Sons, Ltd. Changes in the status of inhaled salbutamol in sport are examined with recommendations for the future.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1942-7603</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1942-7611</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1002/dta.2184</identifier><identifier>PMID: 28294577</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England</publisher><subject>Administration, Inhalation ; Adrenergic beta-2 Receptor Agonists - administration &amp; dosage ; Adrenergic beta-2 Receptor Agonists - urine ; Adult ; Albuterol - administration &amp; dosage ; Albuterol - urine ; Athletes ; Bronchodilator Agents - administration &amp; dosage ; Bronchodilator Agents - urine ; Doping in Sports ; Humans ; Male ; Sports ; Substance Abuse Detection - methods</subject><ispartof>Drug testing and analysis, 2017-07, Vol.9 (7), p.977-982</ispartof><rights>Copyright © 2017 John Wiley &amp; Sons, Ltd.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3604-67bc2235ddfd2fc9edfaa3c96aed6f3d97cc1a2ff00802ab075f852b66f3e7cf3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3604-67bc2235ddfd2fc9edfaa3c96aed6f3d97cc1a2ff00802ab075f852b66f3e7cf3</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-1303-0535</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002%2Fdta.2184$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002%2Fdta.2184$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,1411,27903,27904,45553,45554</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28294577$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Fitch, Ken D.</creatorcontrib><title>The enigma of inhaled salbutamol and sport: unresolved after 45 years</title><title>Drug testing and analysis</title><addtitle>Drug Test Anal</addtitle><description>During the past 45 years, there have been more changes on the World Anti‐Doping Agency's (WADA) Prohibited List (the List) to the status of inhaled salbutamol than any other substance. With 658 athletes, 6.1% of all participating athletes approved to inhale salbutamol at the 2008 Beijing Games, it is one of the medications used most frequently by Olympic athletes. Nevertheless, since the 2008 Games, WADA has made numerous changes to inhaled salbutamol on the List including prohibiting its use, then a year later permitting it without prior notification and recommending a pharmacokinetic study if an athlete exceeds the urinary threshold of 1000 ng/mL. Recently, an elite athlete undertook two pharmacokinetic studies and the results have raised several questions. These include whether WADA should continue to permit nebulized salbutamol as an acceptable method of inhalation and there is some justification for nebulized salbutamol to be prohibited in sport. Another question is whether the modified advisory on salbutamol in the 2017 List appropriately informs athletes of the risks of exceeding the urinary threshold and the recent changes may not inform athletes optimally. Finally, concern is expressed at the persistent failure of WADA to apply a correction down to a specific gravity of 1.020 when an exogenous substance is identified in the urine of a dehydrated athlete. It is recommended that this should be implemented. Copyright © 2017 John Wiley &amp; Sons, Ltd. Changes in the status of inhaled salbutamol in sport are examined with recommendations for the future.</description><subject>Administration, Inhalation</subject><subject>Adrenergic beta-2 Receptor Agonists - administration &amp; dosage</subject><subject>Adrenergic beta-2 Receptor Agonists - urine</subject><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Albuterol - administration &amp; dosage</subject><subject>Albuterol - urine</subject><subject>Athletes</subject><subject>Bronchodilator Agents - administration &amp; dosage</subject><subject>Bronchodilator Agents - urine</subject><subject>Doping in Sports</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Sports</subject><subject>Substance Abuse Detection - methods</subject><issn>1942-7603</issn><issn>1942-7611</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2017</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kEtOwzAQQC0EovwkToCyZJNiO4mdsKsKBaRKbMramthjGuQkxU5AvQ1n4WSkFMqKlceap6fRI-Sc0TGjlF-ZDsac5ekeOWJFymMpGNvfzTQZkeMQXigVKU-yQzLiOS_STMojMlssMcKmeq4ham1UNUtwaKIAruw7qFsXQTN8V63vrqO-8Rha9zYAYDv0UZp9fqwRfDglBxZcwLOf94Q8zW4X0_t4_nj3MJ3MY50ImsZClpoPJxhjDbe6QGMBEl0IQCNsYgqpNQNuLaU55VBSmdk846UYlii1TU7I5da78u1rj6FTdRU0OgcNtn1QLJcyz1Iusj9U-zYEj1atfFWDXytG1aaaGqqpTbUBvfix9mWNZgf-ZhqAeAu8Vw7X_4rUzWLyLfwCfFt3Bw</recordid><startdate>201707</startdate><enddate>201707</enddate><creator>Fitch, Ken D.</creator><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1303-0535</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>201707</creationdate><title>The enigma of inhaled salbutamol and sport: unresolved after 45 years</title><author>Fitch, Ken D.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3604-67bc2235ddfd2fc9edfaa3c96aed6f3d97cc1a2ff00802ab075f852b66f3e7cf3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2017</creationdate><topic>Administration, Inhalation</topic><topic>Adrenergic beta-2 Receptor Agonists - administration &amp; dosage</topic><topic>Adrenergic beta-2 Receptor Agonists - urine</topic><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Albuterol - administration &amp; dosage</topic><topic>Albuterol - urine</topic><topic>Athletes</topic><topic>Bronchodilator Agents - administration &amp; dosage</topic><topic>Bronchodilator Agents - urine</topic><topic>Doping in Sports</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Sports</topic><topic>Substance Abuse Detection - methods</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Fitch, Ken D.</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Drug testing and analysis</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Fitch, Ken D.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>The enigma of inhaled salbutamol and sport: unresolved after 45 years</atitle><jtitle>Drug testing and analysis</jtitle><addtitle>Drug Test Anal</addtitle><date>2017-07</date><risdate>2017</risdate><volume>9</volume><issue>7</issue><spage>977</spage><epage>982</epage><pages>977-982</pages><issn>1942-7603</issn><eissn>1942-7611</eissn><abstract>During the past 45 years, there have been more changes on the World Anti‐Doping Agency's (WADA) Prohibited List (the List) to the status of inhaled salbutamol than any other substance. With 658 athletes, 6.1% of all participating athletes approved to inhale salbutamol at the 2008 Beijing Games, it is one of the medications used most frequently by Olympic athletes. Nevertheless, since the 2008 Games, WADA has made numerous changes to inhaled salbutamol on the List including prohibiting its use, then a year later permitting it without prior notification and recommending a pharmacokinetic study if an athlete exceeds the urinary threshold of 1000 ng/mL. Recently, an elite athlete undertook two pharmacokinetic studies and the results have raised several questions. These include whether WADA should continue to permit nebulized salbutamol as an acceptable method of inhalation and there is some justification for nebulized salbutamol to be prohibited in sport. Another question is whether the modified advisory on salbutamol in the 2017 List appropriately informs athletes of the risks of exceeding the urinary threshold and the recent changes may not inform athletes optimally. Finally, concern is expressed at the persistent failure of WADA to apply a correction down to a specific gravity of 1.020 when an exogenous substance is identified in the urine of a dehydrated athlete. It is recommended that this should be implemented. Copyright © 2017 John Wiley &amp; Sons, Ltd. Changes in the status of inhaled salbutamol in sport are examined with recommendations for the future.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pmid>28294577</pmid><doi>10.1002/dta.2184</doi><tpages>6</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1303-0535</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1942-7603
ispartof Drug testing and analysis, 2017-07, Vol.9 (7), p.977-982
issn 1942-7603
1942-7611
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1877854265
source Wiley Online Library - AutoHoldings Journals; MEDLINE
subjects Administration, Inhalation
Adrenergic beta-2 Receptor Agonists - administration & dosage
Adrenergic beta-2 Receptor Agonists - urine
Adult
Albuterol - administration & dosage
Albuterol - urine
Athletes
Bronchodilator Agents - administration & dosage
Bronchodilator Agents - urine
Doping in Sports
Humans
Male
Sports
Substance Abuse Detection - methods
title The enigma of inhaled salbutamol and sport: unresolved after 45 years
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-26T11%3A31%3A41IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20enigma%20of%20inhaled%20salbutamol%20and%20sport:%20unresolved%20after%2045%C2%A0years&rft.jtitle=Drug%20testing%20and%20analysis&rft.au=Fitch,%20Ken%20D.&rft.date=2017-07&rft.volume=9&rft.issue=7&rft.spage=977&rft.epage=982&rft.pages=977-982&rft.issn=1942-7603&rft.eissn=1942-7611&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002/dta.2184&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1877854265%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1877854265&rft_id=info:pmid/28294577&rfr_iscdi=true