Short-Term Probabilistic Forecasts of the 31 May 2013 Oklahoma Tornado and Flash Flood Event Using a Continuous-Update-Cycle Storm-Scale Ensemble System
A continuous-update-cycle storm-scale ensemble data assimilation (DA) and prediction system using the ARW model and DART software is used to generate retrospective 0–6-h ensemble forecasts of the 31 May 2013 tornado and flash flood event over central Oklahoma, with a focus on the prediction of heavy...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Weather and forecasting 2016-06, Vol.31 (3), p.957-983 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 983 |
---|---|
container_issue | 3 |
container_start_page | 957 |
container_title | Weather and forecasting |
container_volume | 31 |
creator | Yussouf, Nusrat Kain, John S Clark, Adam J |
description | A continuous-update-cycle storm-scale ensemble data assimilation (DA) and prediction system using the ARW model and DART software is used to generate retrospective 0–6-h ensemble forecasts of the 31 May 2013 tornado and flash flood event over central Oklahoma, with a focus on the prediction of heavy rainfall. Results indicate that the model-predicted probabilities of strong low-level mesocyclones correspond well with the locations of observed mesocyclones and with the observed damage track. The ensemble-mean quantitative precipitation forecast (QPF) from the radar DA experiments match NCEP’s stage IV analyses reasonably well in terms of location and amount of rainfall, particularly during the 0–3-h forecast period. In contrast, significant displacement errors and lower rainfall totals are evident in a control experiment that withholds radar data during the DA. The ensemble-derived probabilistic QPF (PQPF) from the radar DA experiment is more skillful than the PQPF from the no_radar experiment, based on visual inspection and probabilistic verification metrics. A novel object-based storm-tracking algorithm provides additional insight, suggesting that explicit assimilation and 1–2-h prediction of the dominant supercell is remarkably skillful in the radar experiment. The skill in both experiments is substantially higher during the 0–3-h forecast period than in the 3–6-h period. Furthermore, the difference in skill between the two forecasts decreases sharply during the latter period, indicating that the impact of radar DA is greatest during early forecast hours. Overall, the results demonstrate the potential for a frequently updated, high-resolution ensemble system to extend probabilistic low-level mesocyclone and flash flood forecast lead times and improve accuracy of convective precipitation nowcasting. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1175/WAF-D-15-0160.1 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1877840538</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1924915804</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c343t-aefec63f11f6c0ffa70fc0af7f98505a2a067a597a51298003fdd5e0fb956c163</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpdkU2P0zAQhi0EEqVw5mqJCxezM3GcOMdVt12QFi1SW3G0po5NsyRxsV2k_hN-Lq6WE4f50KtHo5l5GXuP8AmxVTffbzfiTqASgE2RXrAFqgoE1LJ-yRagdSU0quY1e5PSEwBUquoW7M_2GGIWOxcn_i2GAx2GcUh5sHwTorOUcuLB83x0XCL_ShdeAUr--HOkY5iI70KcqQ-c5p5vRkrHkkPo-fq3mzPfp2H-wYmvwpyH-RzOSexPPWUnVhc7Or7NIU5ia6n06zm56XAVLym76S175WlM7t2_umT7zXq3-iweHu-_rG4fhJW1zIKcd7aRHtE3FrynFrwF8q3vtAJFFUHTkupKYNVpAOn7Xjnwh041Fhu5ZB-f555i-HV2KZtpSNaNI82u7GtQt62uQUld0A__oU_hXM4fC9VVdYdKl28v2c0zZWNIKTpvTnGYKF4Mgrk6ZYpT5s6gMlenDMq_qI6GfQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1924915804</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Short-Term Probabilistic Forecasts of the 31 May 2013 Oklahoma Tornado and Flash Flood Event Using a Continuous-Update-Cycle Storm-Scale Ensemble System</title><source>American Meteorological Society</source><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Yussouf, Nusrat ; Kain, John S ; Clark, Adam J</creator><creatorcontrib>Yussouf, Nusrat ; Kain, John S ; Clark, Adam J</creatorcontrib><description>A continuous-update-cycle storm-scale ensemble data assimilation (DA) and prediction system using the ARW model and DART software is used to generate retrospective 0–6-h ensemble forecasts of the 31 May 2013 tornado and flash flood event over central Oklahoma, with a focus on the prediction of heavy rainfall. Results indicate that the model-predicted probabilities of strong low-level mesocyclones correspond well with the locations of observed mesocyclones and with the observed damage track. The ensemble-mean quantitative precipitation forecast (QPF) from the radar DA experiments match NCEP’s stage IV analyses reasonably well in terms of location and amount of rainfall, particularly during the 0–3-h forecast period. In contrast, significant displacement errors and lower rainfall totals are evident in a control experiment that withholds radar data during the DA. The ensemble-derived probabilistic QPF (PQPF) from the radar DA experiment is more skillful than the PQPF from the no_radar experiment, based on visual inspection and probabilistic verification metrics. A novel object-based storm-tracking algorithm provides additional insight, suggesting that explicit assimilation and 1–2-h prediction of the dominant supercell is remarkably skillful in the radar experiment. The skill in both experiments is substantially higher during the 0–3-h forecast period than in the 3–6-h period. Furthermore, the difference in skill between the two forecasts decreases sharply during the latter period, indicating that the impact of radar DA is greatest during early forecast hours. Overall, the results demonstrate the potential for a frequently updated, high-resolution ensemble system to extend probabilistic low-level mesocyclone and flash flood forecast lead times and improve accuracy of convective precipitation nowcasting.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0882-8156</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1520-0434</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1175/WAF-D-15-0160.1</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Boston: American Meteorological Society</publisher><subject>Atmospheric precipitations ; Computer programs ; Convective precipitation ; Data assimilation ; Data collection ; Flash floods ; Flood damage ; Flood forecasting ; Flood predictions ; Floods ; Heavy rainfall ; High resolution ; Inspection ; Levels ; Mathematical models ; Nowcasting ; Precipitation ; Probability theory ; Radar ; Radar data ; Rain ; Rainfall ; Software ; Storms ; Tornadoes ; Tracking ; Upgrading ; Visual inspection ; Visual perception ; Weather forecasting</subject><ispartof>Weather and forecasting, 2016-06, Vol.31 (3), p.957-983</ispartof><rights>Copyright American Meteorological Society 2016</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c343t-aefec63f11f6c0ffa70fc0af7f98505a2a067a597a51298003fdd5e0fb956c163</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,777,781,3668,27905,27906</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Yussouf, Nusrat</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kain, John S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Clark, Adam J</creatorcontrib><title>Short-Term Probabilistic Forecasts of the 31 May 2013 Oklahoma Tornado and Flash Flood Event Using a Continuous-Update-Cycle Storm-Scale Ensemble System</title><title>Weather and forecasting</title><description>A continuous-update-cycle storm-scale ensemble data assimilation (DA) and prediction system using the ARW model and DART software is used to generate retrospective 0–6-h ensemble forecasts of the 31 May 2013 tornado and flash flood event over central Oklahoma, with a focus on the prediction of heavy rainfall. Results indicate that the model-predicted probabilities of strong low-level mesocyclones correspond well with the locations of observed mesocyclones and with the observed damage track. The ensemble-mean quantitative precipitation forecast (QPF) from the radar DA experiments match NCEP’s stage IV analyses reasonably well in terms of location and amount of rainfall, particularly during the 0–3-h forecast period. In contrast, significant displacement errors and lower rainfall totals are evident in a control experiment that withholds radar data during the DA. The ensemble-derived probabilistic QPF (PQPF) from the radar DA experiment is more skillful than the PQPF from the no_radar experiment, based on visual inspection and probabilistic verification metrics. A novel object-based storm-tracking algorithm provides additional insight, suggesting that explicit assimilation and 1–2-h prediction of the dominant supercell is remarkably skillful in the radar experiment. The skill in both experiments is substantially higher during the 0–3-h forecast period than in the 3–6-h period. Furthermore, the difference in skill between the two forecasts decreases sharply during the latter period, indicating that the impact of radar DA is greatest during early forecast hours. Overall, the results demonstrate the potential for a frequently updated, high-resolution ensemble system to extend probabilistic low-level mesocyclone and flash flood forecast lead times and improve accuracy of convective precipitation nowcasting.</description><subject>Atmospheric precipitations</subject><subject>Computer programs</subject><subject>Convective precipitation</subject><subject>Data assimilation</subject><subject>Data collection</subject><subject>Flash floods</subject><subject>Flood damage</subject><subject>Flood forecasting</subject><subject>Flood predictions</subject><subject>Floods</subject><subject>Heavy rainfall</subject><subject>High resolution</subject><subject>Inspection</subject><subject>Levels</subject><subject>Mathematical models</subject><subject>Nowcasting</subject><subject>Precipitation</subject><subject>Probability theory</subject><subject>Radar</subject><subject>Radar data</subject><subject>Rain</subject><subject>Rainfall</subject><subject>Software</subject><subject>Storms</subject><subject>Tornadoes</subject><subject>Tracking</subject><subject>Upgrading</subject><subject>Visual inspection</subject><subject>Visual perception</subject><subject>Weather forecasting</subject><issn>0882-8156</issn><issn>1520-0434</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2016</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNpdkU2P0zAQhi0EEqVw5mqJCxezM3GcOMdVt12QFi1SW3G0po5NsyRxsV2k_hN-Lq6WE4f50KtHo5l5GXuP8AmxVTffbzfiTqASgE2RXrAFqgoE1LJ-yRagdSU0quY1e5PSEwBUquoW7M_2GGIWOxcn_i2GAx2GcUh5sHwTorOUcuLB83x0XCL_ShdeAUr--HOkY5iI70KcqQ-c5p5vRkrHkkPo-fq3mzPfp2H-wYmvwpyH-RzOSexPPWUnVhc7Or7NIU5ia6n06zm56XAVLym76S175WlM7t2_umT7zXq3-iweHu-_rG4fhJW1zIKcd7aRHtE3FrynFrwF8q3vtAJFFUHTkupKYNVpAOn7Xjnwh041Fhu5ZB-f555i-HV2KZtpSNaNI82u7GtQt62uQUld0A__oU_hXM4fC9VVdYdKl28v2c0zZWNIKTpvTnGYKF4Mgrk6ZYpT5s6gMlenDMq_qI6GfQ</recordid><startdate>20160601</startdate><enddate>20160601</enddate><creator>Yussouf, Nusrat</creator><creator>Kain, John S</creator><creator>Clark, Adam J</creator><general>American Meteorological Society</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QH</scope><scope>7RQ</scope><scope>7TG</scope><scope>7TN</scope><scope>7UA</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88F</scope><scope>8AF</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ARAPS</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>BKSAR</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>H96</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>KL.</scope><scope>L.G</scope><scope>M1Q</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>P5Z</scope><scope>P62</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PCBAR</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>S0X</scope><scope>U9A</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20160601</creationdate><title>Short-Term Probabilistic Forecasts of the 31 May 2013 Oklahoma Tornado and Flash Flood Event Using a Continuous-Update-Cycle Storm-Scale Ensemble System</title><author>Yussouf, Nusrat ; Kain, John S ; Clark, Adam J</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c343t-aefec63f11f6c0ffa70fc0af7f98505a2a067a597a51298003fdd5e0fb956c163</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2016</creationdate><topic>Atmospheric precipitations</topic><topic>Computer programs</topic><topic>Convective precipitation</topic><topic>Data assimilation</topic><topic>Data collection</topic><topic>Flash floods</topic><topic>Flood damage</topic><topic>Flood forecasting</topic><topic>Flood predictions</topic><topic>Floods</topic><topic>Heavy rainfall</topic><topic>High resolution</topic><topic>Inspection</topic><topic>Levels</topic><topic>Mathematical models</topic><topic>Nowcasting</topic><topic>Precipitation</topic><topic>Probability theory</topic><topic>Radar</topic><topic>Radar data</topic><topic>Rain</topic><topic>Rainfall</topic><topic>Software</topic><topic>Storms</topic><topic>Tornadoes</topic><topic>Tracking</topic><topic>Upgrading</topic><topic>Visual inspection</topic><topic>Visual perception</topic><topic>Weather forecasting</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Yussouf, Nusrat</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kain, John S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Clark, Adam J</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Aqualine</collection><collection>Career & Technical Education Database</collection><collection>Meteorological & Geoastrophysical Abstracts</collection><collection>Oceanic Abstracts</collection><collection>Water Resources Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Military Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>STEM Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>Agricultural & Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>eLibrary</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Earth, Atmospheric & Aquatic Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 2: Ocean Technology, Policy & Non-Living Resources</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>Meteorological & Geoastrophysical Abstracts - Academic</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><collection>Military Database</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>Earth, Atmospheric & Aquatic Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>SIRS Editorial</collection><jtitle>Weather and forecasting</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Yussouf, Nusrat</au><au>Kain, John S</au><au>Clark, Adam J</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Short-Term Probabilistic Forecasts of the 31 May 2013 Oklahoma Tornado and Flash Flood Event Using a Continuous-Update-Cycle Storm-Scale Ensemble System</atitle><jtitle>Weather and forecasting</jtitle><date>2016-06-01</date><risdate>2016</risdate><volume>31</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>957</spage><epage>983</epage><pages>957-983</pages><issn>0882-8156</issn><eissn>1520-0434</eissn><abstract>A continuous-update-cycle storm-scale ensemble data assimilation (DA) and prediction system using the ARW model and DART software is used to generate retrospective 0–6-h ensemble forecasts of the 31 May 2013 tornado and flash flood event over central Oklahoma, with a focus on the prediction of heavy rainfall. Results indicate that the model-predicted probabilities of strong low-level mesocyclones correspond well with the locations of observed mesocyclones and with the observed damage track. The ensemble-mean quantitative precipitation forecast (QPF) from the radar DA experiments match NCEP’s stage IV analyses reasonably well in terms of location and amount of rainfall, particularly during the 0–3-h forecast period. In contrast, significant displacement errors and lower rainfall totals are evident in a control experiment that withholds radar data during the DA. The ensemble-derived probabilistic QPF (PQPF) from the radar DA experiment is more skillful than the PQPF from the no_radar experiment, based on visual inspection and probabilistic verification metrics. A novel object-based storm-tracking algorithm provides additional insight, suggesting that explicit assimilation and 1–2-h prediction of the dominant supercell is remarkably skillful in the radar experiment. The skill in both experiments is substantially higher during the 0–3-h forecast period than in the 3–6-h period. Furthermore, the difference in skill between the two forecasts decreases sharply during the latter period, indicating that the impact of radar DA is greatest during early forecast hours. Overall, the results demonstrate the potential for a frequently updated, high-resolution ensemble system to extend probabilistic low-level mesocyclone and flash flood forecast lead times and improve accuracy of convective precipitation nowcasting.</abstract><cop>Boston</cop><pub>American Meteorological Society</pub><doi>10.1175/WAF-D-15-0160.1</doi><tpages>27</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0882-8156 |
ispartof | Weather and forecasting, 2016-06, Vol.31 (3), p.957-983 |
issn | 0882-8156 1520-0434 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1877840538 |
source | American Meteorological Society; Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals; Alma/SFX Local Collection |
subjects | Atmospheric precipitations Computer programs Convective precipitation Data assimilation Data collection Flash floods Flood damage Flood forecasting Flood predictions Floods Heavy rainfall High resolution Inspection Levels Mathematical models Nowcasting Precipitation Probability theory Radar Radar data Rain Rainfall Software Storms Tornadoes Tracking Upgrading Visual inspection Visual perception Weather forecasting |
title | Short-Term Probabilistic Forecasts of the 31 May 2013 Oklahoma Tornado and Flash Flood Event Using a Continuous-Update-Cycle Storm-Scale Ensemble System |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-18T07%3A34%3A53IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Short-Term%20Probabilistic%20Forecasts%20of%20the%2031%20May%202013%20Oklahoma%20Tornado%20and%20Flash%20Flood%20Event%20Using%20a%20Continuous-Update-Cycle%20Storm-Scale%20Ensemble%20System&rft.jtitle=Weather%20and%20forecasting&rft.au=Yussouf,%20Nusrat&rft.date=2016-06-01&rft.volume=31&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=957&rft.epage=983&rft.pages=957-983&rft.issn=0882-8156&rft.eissn=1520-0434&rft_id=info:doi/10.1175/WAF-D-15-0160.1&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1924915804%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1924915804&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |