What can genome-wide association studies tell us about the evolutionary forces maintaining genetic variation for quantitative traits?

Understanding the evolutionary forces that shape genetic variation within species has long been a goal of evolutionary biology. Integrating data for the genetic architecture of traits from genome-wide association mapping studies (GWAS) along with the development of new population genetic methods for...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:The New phytologist 2017-04, Vol.214 (1), p.21-33
Hauptverfasser: Josephs, Emily B., Stinchcombe, John R., Wright, Stephen I.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 33
container_issue 1
container_start_page 21
container_title The New phytologist
container_volume 214
creator Josephs, Emily B.
Stinchcombe, John R.
Wright, Stephen I.
description Understanding the evolutionary forces that shape genetic variation within species has long been a goal of evolutionary biology. Integrating data for the genetic architecture of traits from genome-wide association mapping studies (GWAS) along with the development of new population genetic methods for identifying selection in sequence data may allow us to evaluate the roles of mutation–selection balance and balancing selection in shaping genetic variation at various scales. Here,wereview the theoretical predictions for genetic architecture and additional signals of selection on genomic sequence for the loci that affect traits. Next,we reviewhow plant GWAS have tested for the signatures of various selective scenarios. Limited evidence to date suggests that within-population variation is maintained primarily by mutation–selection balance while variation across the landscape is the result of local adaptation. However, there are a number of inherent biases in these interpretations. We highlight these challenges and suggest ways forward to further understanding of the maintenance of variation.
doi_str_mv 10.1111/nph.14410
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>jstor_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1877814361</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>90001548</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>90001548</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4430-965d0e8bdc58fcbc9f95ec0008325c5bbd3f0667106ab44d58698364577e36ed3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkV1rFDEUhoModlu98Acogd60F9Mmk49JrkRKtUJRLxS9GzKZM90sM5NtPrb0B_i_zXa3vRAEAyEQnvPAe16E3lByRss5n9fLM8o5Jc_QgnKpK0VZ8xwtCKlVJbn8dYAOY1wRQrSQ9Ut0UKuaUqHqBfr9c2kStmbGNzD7Cao71wM2MXrrTHJ-xjHl3kHECcYR54hN53PCaQkYNn7MW8aEezz4YAs1GTenct18szVCchZvTNi7CoRvs5mTS-VjAzgF41J8_wq9GMwY4fX-PUI_Pl5-v7iqrr9--nzx4bqynDNSaSl6AqrrrVCD7awetABbYilWCyu6rmcDkbKhRJqO814oqRWTXDQNMAk9O0InO-86-NsMMbWTi7YEMzP4HFuqmkZRziT9D1RqLTmXTUGP_0JXPoe5BCmU4kRLTbfU6Y6ywccYYGjXwU1ldS0l7bbGttTYPtRY2Hd7Y-4m6J_Ix94KcL4D7twI9_82tV--XT0q3-4mVjH58DShy_ao4Ir9Aen8sfo</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1884096917</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>What can genome-wide association studies tell us about the evolutionary forces maintaining genetic variation for quantitative traits?</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><source>Jstor Complete Legacy</source><source>Wiley Free Content</source><creator>Josephs, Emily B. ; Stinchcombe, John R. ; Wright, Stephen I.</creator><creatorcontrib>Josephs, Emily B. ; Stinchcombe, John R. ; Wright, Stephen I.</creatorcontrib><description>Understanding the evolutionary forces that shape genetic variation within species has long been a goal of evolutionary biology. Integrating data for the genetic architecture of traits from genome-wide association mapping studies (GWAS) along with the development of new population genetic methods for identifying selection in sequence data may allow us to evaluate the roles of mutation–selection balance and balancing selection in shaping genetic variation at various scales. Here,wereview the theoretical predictions for genetic architecture and additional signals of selection on genomic sequence for the loci that affect traits. Next,we reviewhow plant GWAS have tested for the signatures of various selective scenarios. Limited evidence to date suggests that within-population variation is maintained primarily by mutation–selection balance while variation across the landscape is the result of local adaptation. However, there are a number of inherent biases in these interpretations. We highlight these challenges and suggest ways forward to further understanding of the maintenance of variation.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0028-646X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1469-8137</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/nph.14410</identifier><identifier>PMID: 28211582</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: New Phytologist Trust</publisher><subject>Adaptation, Physiological - genetics ; balancing selection ; Biological Evolution ; F ST ; genetic architecture ; Genetic Variation ; Genome-Wide Association Study ; genome‐wide association mapping studies (GWAS) ; mutation–selection balance ; Quantitative Trait, Heritable ; Selection, Genetic ; selective sweep ; Tansley review</subject><ispartof>The New phytologist, 2017-04, Vol.214 (1), p.21-33</ispartof><rights>2017 New Phytologist Trust</rights><rights>2017 The Authors. New Phytologist © 2017 New Phytologist Trust</rights><rights>2017 The Authors. New Phytologist © 2017 New Phytologist Trust.</rights><rights>Copyright © 2017 New Phytologist Trust</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4430-965d0e8bdc58fcbc9f95ec0008325c5bbd3f0667106ab44d58698364577e36ed3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4430-965d0e8bdc58fcbc9f95ec0008325c5bbd3f0667106ab44d58698364577e36ed3</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-3349-2964</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/90001548$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/90001548$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,777,781,800,1412,1428,27905,27906,45555,45556,46390,46814,57998,58231</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28211582$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Josephs, Emily B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stinchcombe, John R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wright, Stephen I.</creatorcontrib><title>What can genome-wide association studies tell us about the evolutionary forces maintaining genetic variation for quantitative traits?</title><title>The New phytologist</title><addtitle>New Phytol</addtitle><description>Understanding the evolutionary forces that shape genetic variation within species has long been a goal of evolutionary biology. Integrating data for the genetic architecture of traits from genome-wide association mapping studies (GWAS) along with the development of new population genetic methods for identifying selection in sequence data may allow us to evaluate the roles of mutation–selection balance and balancing selection in shaping genetic variation at various scales. Here,wereview the theoretical predictions for genetic architecture and additional signals of selection on genomic sequence for the loci that affect traits. Next,we reviewhow plant GWAS have tested for the signatures of various selective scenarios. Limited evidence to date suggests that within-population variation is maintained primarily by mutation–selection balance while variation across the landscape is the result of local adaptation. However, there are a number of inherent biases in these interpretations. We highlight these challenges and suggest ways forward to further understanding of the maintenance of variation.</description><subject>Adaptation, Physiological - genetics</subject><subject>balancing selection</subject><subject>Biological Evolution</subject><subject>F ST</subject><subject>genetic architecture</subject><subject>Genetic Variation</subject><subject>Genome-Wide Association Study</subject><subject>genome‐wide association mapping studies (GWAS)</subject><subject>mutation–selection balance</subject><subject>Quantitative Trait, Heritable</subject><subject>Selection, Genetic</subject><subject>selective sweep</subject><subject>Tansley review</subject><issn>0028-646X</issn><issn>1469-8137</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2017</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqNkV1rFDEUhoModlu98Acogd60F9Mmk49JrkRKtUJRLxS9GzKZM90sM5NtPrb0B_i_zXa3vRAEAyEQnvPAe16E3lByRss5n9fLM8o5Jc_QgnKpK0VZ8xwtCKlVJbn8dYAOY1wRQrSQ9Ut0UKuaUqHqBfr9c2kStmbGNzD7Cao71wM2MXrrTHJ-xjHl3kHECcYR54hN53PCaQkYNn7MW8aEezz4YAs1GTenct18szVCchZvTNi7CoRvs5mTS-VjAzgF41J8_wq9GMwY4fX-PUI_Pl5-v7iqrr9--nzx4bqynDNSaSl6AqrrrVCD7awetABbYilWCyu6rmcDkbKhRJqO814oqRWTXDQNMAk9O0InO-86-NsMMbWTi7YEMzP4HFuqmkZRziT9D1RqLTmXTUGP_0JXPoe5BCmU4kRLTbfU6Y6ywccYYGjXwU1ldS0l7bbGttTYPtRY2Hd7Y-4m6J_Ix94KcL4D7twI9_82tV--XT0q3-4mVjH58DShy_ao4Ir9Aen8sfo</recordid><startdate>20170401</startdate><enddate>20170401</enddate><creator>Josephs, Emily B.</creator><creator>Stinchcombe, John R.</creator><creator>Wright, Stephen I.</creator><general>New Phytologist Trust</general><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QO</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>H95</scope><scope>L.G</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>RC3</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3349-2964</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20170401</creationdate><title>What can genome-wide association studies tell us about the evolutionary forces maintaining genetic variation for quantitative traits?</title><author>Josephs, Emily B. ; Stinchcombe, John R. ; Wright, Stephen I.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4430-965d0e8bdc58fcbc9f95ec0008325c5bbd3f0667106ab44d58698364577e36ed3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2017</creationdate><topic>Adaptation, Physiological - genetics</topic><topic>balancing selection</topic><topic>Biological Evolution</topic><topic>F ST</topic><topic>genetic architecture</topic><topic>Genetic Variation</topic><topic>Genome-Wide Association Study</topic><topic>genome‐wide association mapping studies (GWAS)</topic><topic>mutation–selection balance</topic><topic>Quantitative Trait, Heritable</topic><topic>Selection, Genetic</topic><topic>selective sweep</topic><topic>Tansley review</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Josephs, Emily B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stinchcombe, John R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wright, Stephen I.</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Biotechnology Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 1: Biological Sciences &amp; Living Resources</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Genetics Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>The New phytologist</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Josephs, Emily B.</au><au>Stinchcombe, John R.</au><au>Wright, Stephen I.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>What can genome-wide association studies tell us about the evolutionary forces maintaining genetic variation for quantitative traits?</atitle><jtitle>The New phytologist</jtitle><addtitle>New Phytol</addtitle><date>2017-04-01</date><risdate>2017</risdate><volume>214</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>21</spage><epage>33</epage><pages>21-33</pages><issn>0028-646X</issn><eissn>1469-8137</eissn><abstract>Understanding the evolutionary forces that shape genetic variation within species has long been a goal of evolutionary biology. Integrating data for the genetic architecture of traits from genome-wide association mapping studies (GWAS) along with the development of new population genetic methods for identifying selection in sequence data may allow us to evaluate the roles of mutation–selection balance and balancing selection in shaping genetic variation at various scales. Here,wereview the theoretical predictions for genetic architecture and additional signals of selection on genomic sequence for the loci that affect traits. Next,we reviewhow plant GWAS have tested for the signatures of various selective scenarios. Limited evidence to date suggests that within-population variation is maintained primarily by mutation–selection balance while variation across the landscape is the result of local adaptation. However, there are a number of inherent biases in these interpretations. We highlight these challenges and suggest ways forward to further understanding of the maintenance of variation.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>New Phytologist Trust</pub><pmid>28211582</pmid><doi>10.1111/nph.14410</doi><tpages>13</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3349-2964</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0028-646X
ispartof The New phytologist, 2017-04, Vol.214 (1), p.21-33
issn 0028-646X
1469-8137
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1877814361
source MEDLINE; Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete; Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals; Jstor Complete Legacy; Wiley Free Content
subjects Adaptation, Physiological - genetics
balancing selection
Biological Evolution
F ST
genetic architecture
Genetic Variation
Genome-Wide Association Study
genome‐wide association mapping studies (GWAS)
mutation–selection balance
Quantitative Trait, Heritable
Selection, Genetic
selective sweep
Tansley review
title What can genome-wide association studies tell us about the evolutionary forces maintaining genetic variation for quantitative traits?
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-20T10%3A58%3A11IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=What%20can%20genome-wide%20association%20studies%20tell%20us%20about%20the%20evolutionary%20forces%20maintaining%20genetic%20variation%20for%20quantitative%20traits?&rft.jtitle=The%20New%20phytologist&rft.au=Josephs,%20Emily%20B.&rft.date=2017-04-01&rft.volume=214&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=21&rft.epage=33&rft.pages=21-33&rft.issn=0028-646X&rft.eissn=1469-8137&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/nph.14410&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_proqu%3E90001548%3C/jstor_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1884096917&rft_id=info:pmid/28211582&rft_jstor_id=90001548&rfr_iscdi=true