What can genome-wide association studies tell us about the evolutionary forces maintaining genetic variation for quantitative traits?
Understanding the evolutionary forces that shape genetic variation within species has long been a goal of evolutionary biology. Integrating data for the genetic architecture of traits from genome-wide association mapping studies (GWAS) along with the development of new population genetic methods for...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | The New phytologist 2017-04, Vol.214 (1), p.21-33 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 33 |
---|---|
container_issue | 1 |
container_start_page | 21 |
container_title | The New phytologist |
container_volume | 214 |
creator | Josephs, Emily B. Stinchcombe, John R. Wright, Stephen I. |
description | Understanding the evolutionary forces that shape genetic variation within species has long been a goal of evolutionary biology. Integrating data for the genetic architecture of traits from genome-wide association mapping studies (GWAS) along with the development of new population genetic methods for identifying selection in sequence data may allow us to evaluate the roles of mutation–selection balance and balancing selection in shaping genetic variation at various scales. Here,wereview the theoretical predictions for genetic architecture and additional signals of selection on genomic sequence for the loci that affect traits. Next,we reviewhow plant GWAS have tested for the signatures of various selective scenarios. Limited evidence to date suggests that within-population variation is maintained primarily by mutation–selection balance while variation across the landscape is the result of local adaptation. However, there are a number of inherent biases in these interpretations. We highlight these challenges and suggest ways forward to further understanding of the maintenance of variation. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1111/nph.14410 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>jstor_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1877814361</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>90001548</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>90001548</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4430-965d0e8bdc58fcbc9f95ec0008325c5bbd3f0667106ab44d58698364577e36ed3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkV1rFDEUhoModlu98Acogd60F9Mmk49JrkRKtUJRLxS9GzKZM90sM5NtPrb0B_i_zXa3vRAEAyEQnvPAe16E3lByRss5n9fLM8o5Jc_QgnKpK0VZ8xwtCKlVJbn8dYAOY1wRQrSQ9Ut0UKuaUqHqBfr9c2kStmbGNzD7Cao71wM2MXrrTHJ-xjHl3kHECcYR54hN53PCaQkYNn7MW8aEezz4YAs1GTenct18szVCchZvTNi7CoRvs5mTS-VjAzgF41J8_wq9GMwY4fX-PUI_Pl5-v7iqrr9--nzx4bqynDNSaSl6AqrrrVCD7awetABbYilWCyu6rmcDkbKhRJqO814oqRWTXDQNMAk9O0InO-86-NsMMbWTi7YEMzP4HFuqmkZRziT9D1RqLTmXTUGP_0JXPoe5BCmU4kRLTbfU6Y6ywccYYGjXwU1ldS0l7bbGttTYPtRY2Hd7Y-4m6J_Ix94KcL4D7twI9_82tV--XT0q3-4mVjH58DShy_ao4Ir9Aen8sfo</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1884096917</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>What can genome-wide association studies tell us about the evolutionary forces maintaining genetic variation for quantitative traits?</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><source>Jstor Complete Legacy</source><source>Wiley Free Content</source><creator>Josephs, Emily B. ; Stinchcombe, John R. ; Wright, Stephen I.</creator><creatorcontrib>Josephs, Emily B. ; Stinchcombe, John R. ; Wright, Stephen I.</creatorcontrib><description>Understanding the evolutionary forces that shape genetic variation within species has long been a goal of evolutionary biology. Integrating data for the genetic architecture of traits from genome-wide association mapping studies (GWAS) along with the development of new population genetic methods for identifying selection in sequence data may allow us to evaluate the roles of mutation–selection balance and balancing selection in shaping genetic variation at various scales. Here,wereview the theoretical predictions for genetic architecture and additional signals of selection on genomic sequence for the loci that affect traits. Next,we reviewhow plant GWAS have tested for the signatures of various selective scenarios. Limited evidence to date suggests that within-population variation is maintained primarily by mutation–selection balance while variation across the landscape is the result of local adaptation. However, there are a number of inherent biases in these interpretations. We highlight these challenges and suggest ways forward to further understanding of the maintenance of variation.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0028-646X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1469-8137</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/nph.14410</identifier><identifier>PMID: 28211582</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: New Phytologist Trust</publisher><subject>Adaptation, Physiological - genetics ; balancing selection ; Biological Evolution ; F ST ; genetic architecture ; Genetic Variation ; Genome-Wide Association Study ; genome‐wide association mapping studies (GWAS) ; mutation–selection balance ; Quantitative Trait, Heritable ; Selection, Genetic ; selective sweep ; Tansley review</subject><ispartof>The New phytologist, 2017-04, Vol.214 (1), p.21-33</ispartof><rights>2017 New Phytologist Trust</rights><rights>2017 The Authors. New Phytologist © 2017 New Phytologist Trust</rights><rights>2017 The Authors. New Phytologist © 2017 New Phytologist Trust.</rights><rights>Copyright © 2017 New Phytologist Trust</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4430-965d0e8bdc58fcbc9f95ec0008325c5bbd3f0667106ab44d58698364577e36ed3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4430-965d0e8bdc58fcbc9f95ec0008325c5bbd3f0667106ab44d58698364577e36ed3</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-3349-2964</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/90001548$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/90001548$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,777,781,800,1412,1428,27905,27906,45555,45556,46390,46814,57998,58231</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28211582$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Josephs, Emily B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stinchcombe, John R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wright, Stephen I.</creatorcontrib><title>What can genome-wide association studies tell us about the evolutionary forces maintaining genetic variation for quantitative traits?</title><title>The New phytologist</title><addtitle>New Phytol</addtitle><description>Understanding the evolutionary forces that shape genetic variation within species has long been a goal of evolutionary biology. Integrating data for the genetic architecture of traits from genome-wide association mapping studies (GWAS) along with the development of new population genetic methods for identifying selection in sequence data may allow us to evaluate the roles of mutation–selection balance and balancing selection in shaping genetic variation at various scales. Here,wereview the theoretical predictions for genetic architecture and additional signals of selection on genomic sequence for the loci that affect traits. Next,we reviewhow plant GWAS have tested for the signatures of various selective scenarios. Limited evidence to date suggests that within-population variation is maintained primarily by mutation–selection balance while variation across the landscape is the result of local adaptation. However, there are a number of inherent biases in these interpretations. We highlight these challenges and suggest ways forward to further understanding of the maintenance of variation.</description><subject>Adaptation, Physiological - genetics</subject><subject>balancing selection</subject><subject>Biological Evolution</subject><subject>F ST</subject><subject>genetic architecture</subject><subject>Genetic Variation</subject><subject>Genome-Wide Association Study</subject><subject>genome‐wide association mapping studies (GWAS)</subject><subject>mutation–selection balance</subject><subject>Quantitative Trait, Heritable</subject><subject>Selection, Genetic</subject><subject>selective sweep</subject><subject>Tansley review</subject><issn>0028-646X</issn><issn>1469-8137</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2017</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqNkV1rFDEUhoModlu98Acogd60F9Mmk49JrkRKtUJRLxS9GzKZM90sM5NtPrb0B_i_zXa3vRAEAyEQnvPAe16E3lByRss5n9fLM8o5Jc_QgnKpK0VZ8xwtCKlVJbn8dYAOY1wRQrSQ9Ut0UKuaUqHqBfr9c2kStmbGNzD7Cao71wM2MXrrTHJ-xjHl3kHECcYR54hN53PCaQkYNn7MW8aEezz4YAs1GTenct18szVCchZvTNi7CoRvs5mTS-VjAzgF41J8_wq9GMwY4fX-PUI_Pl5-v7iqrr9--nzx4bqynDNSaSl6AqrrrVCD7awetABbYilWCyu6rmcDkbKhRJqO814oqRWTXDQNMAk9O0InO-86-NsMMbWTi7YEMzP4HFuqmkZRziT9D1RqLTmXTUGP_0JXPoe5BCmU4kRLTbfU6Y6ywccYYGjXwU1ldS0l7bbGttTYPtRY2Hd7Y-4m6J_Ix94KcL4D7twI9_82tV--XT0q3-4mVjH58DShy_ao4Ir9Aen8sfo</recordid><startdate>20170401</startdate><enddate>20170401</enddate><creator>Josephs, Emily B.</creator><creator>Stinchcombe, John R.</creator><creator>Wright, Stephen I.</creator><general>New Phytologist Trust</general><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QO</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>H95</scope><scope>L.G</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>RC3</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3349-2964</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20170401</creationdate><title>What can genome-wide association studies tell us about the evolutionary forces maintaining genetic variation for quantitative traits?</title><author>Josephs, Emily B. ; Stinchcombe, John R. ; Wright, Stephen I.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4430-965d0e8bdc58fcbc9f95ec0008325c5bbd3f0667106ab44d58698364577e36ed3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2017</creationdate><topic>Adaptation, Physiological - genetics</topic><topic>balancing selection</topic><topic>Biological Evolution</topic><topic>F ST</topic><topic>genetic architecture</topic><topic>Genetic Variation</topic><topic>Genome-Wide Association Study</topic><topic>genome‐wide association mapping studies (GWAS)</topic><topic>mutation–selection balance</topic><topic>Quantitative Trait, Heritable</topic><topic>Selection, Genetic</topic><topic>selective sweep</topic><topic>Tansley review</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Josephs, Emily B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stinchcombe, John R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wright, Stephen I.</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Biotechnology Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 1: Biological Sciences & Living Resources</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Genetics Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>The New phytologist</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Josephs, Emily B.</au><au>Stinchcombe, John R.</au><au>Wright, Stephen I.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>What can genome-wide association studies tell us about the evolutionary forces maintaining genetic variation for quantitative traits?</atitle><jtitle>The New phytologist</jtitle><addtitle>New Phytol</addtitle><date>2017-04-01</date><risdate>2017</risdate><volume>214</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>21</spage><epage>33</epage><pages>21-33</pages><issn>0028-646X</issn><eissn>1469-8137</eissn><abstract>Understanding the evolutionary forces that shape genetic variation within species has long been a goal of evolutionary biology. Integrating data for the genetic architecture of traits from genome-wide association mapping studies (GWAS) along with the development of new population genetic methods for identifying selection in sequence data may allow us to evaluate the roles of mutation–selection balance and balancing selection in shaping genetic variation at various scales. Here,wereview the theoretical predictions for genetic architecture and additional signals of selection on genomic sequence for the loci that affect traits. Next,we reviewhow plant GWAS have tested for the signatures of various selective scenarios. Limited evidence to date suggests that within-population variation is maintained primarily by mutation–selection balance while variation across the landscape is the result of local adaptation. However, there are a number of inherent biases in these interpretations. We highlight these challenges and suggest ways forward to further understanding of the maintenance of variation.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>New Phytologist Trust</pub><pmid>28211582</pmid><doi>10.1111/nph.14410</doi><tpages>13</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3349-2964</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0028-646X |
ispartof | The New phytologist, 2017-04, Vol.214 (1), p.21-33 |
issn | 0028-646X 1469-8137 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1877814361 |
source | MEDLINE; Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete; Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals; Jstor Complete Legacy; Wiley Free Content |
subjects | Adaptation, Physiological - genetics balancing selection Biological Evolution F ST genetic architecture Genetic Variation Genome-Wide Association Study genome‐wide association mapping studies (GWAS) mutation–selection balance Quantitative Trait, Heritable Selection, Genetic selective sweep Tansley review |
title | What can genome-wide association studies tell us about the evolutionary forces maintaining genetic variation for quantitative traits? |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-20T10%3A58%3A11IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=What%20can%20genome-wide%20association%20studies%20tell%20us%20about%20the%20evolutionary%20forces%20maintaining%20genetic%20variation%20for%20quantitative%20traits?&rft.jtitle=The%20New%20phytologist&rft.au=Josephs,%20Emily%20B.&rft.date=2017-04-01&rft.volume=214&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=21&rft.epage=33&rft.pages=21-33&rft.issn=0028-646X&rft.eissn=1469-8137&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/nph.14410&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_proqu%3E90001548%3C/jstor_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1884096917&rft_id=info:pmid/28211582&rft_jstor_id=90001548&rfr_iscdi=true |