Factors influencing adherence in CML and ways to improvement: Results of a patient-driven survey of 2546 patients in 63 countries
Optimal adherence to CML therapy is of key importance to maximize treatment effectiveness. Two clinical studies (ADAGIO and Hammersmith) have proven a clear correlation between adherence and achieving optimal treatment response and have revealed that non-adherence is common in CML patients (Marin et...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of cancer research and clinical oncology 2017-07, Vol.143 (7), p.1167-1176 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 1176 |
---|---|
container_issue | 7 |
container_start_page | 1167 |
container_title | Journal of cancer research and clinical oncology |
container_volume | 143 |
creator | Geissler, Jan Sharf, Giora Bombaci, Felice Daban, Mina De Jong, Jan Gavin, Tony Pelouchova, Jana Dziwinski, Euzebiusz Hasford, Joerg Hoffmann, Verena Sophia |
description | Optimal adherence to CML therapy is of key importance to maximize treatment effectiveness. Two clinical studies (ADAGIO and Hammersmith) have proven a clear correlation between adherence and achieving optimal treatment response and have revealed that non-adherence is common in CML patients (Marin et al. in J Clin Oncol 28(24):2381–2388,
2010
, Noens et al. in Haematologica 99(33):437–447,
2014
). The aim of this study is to assess the extent of suboptimal adherence and to investigate motivations and behavioural patterns of adherence in a worldwide patient sample. Questionnaires were provided by the CML Advocates Network and were filled in by patients online and offline. Patient characteristics, treatment and motivations were collected. Adherence was assessed by the 8-item Morisky Medication Adherence scale. Logistic regression models were fitted to investigate the influence of different factors on adherence. Overall, 2 546 questionnaires from 63 countries and 79 CML patient organisations were evaluable. 32.7% of participants were highly adherent, 46.5% were in the medium and 20.7% in the low adherence group. Factors increasing the probability of being in the high adherence group are older age, male sex, management of side effects, only one tablet per day and feeling well informed about CML by the doctor. More than 2 years since diagnosis were significantly lowering the chance as was the use of reminding tools. Living arrangements, multiple medication and personal payment obligations increased the probability to be at least in the medium adherent group. This is the most comprehensive study conducted to date to gain knowledge about factors causing non-adherence in CML. Better information on the disease, medication and management of side effects, supported by haematologists, is key to improve adherence. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1007/s00432-017-2372-z |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1877527861</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1912473204</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c438t-b8bc820074bad51d4cf8d0d187935b871a2280a3949bbc66780b15b729160e8b3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1UcFu1DAQtRCILgsf0EtliUsvAY8dx05vaNUC0iIkBGfLdiZtqsTZ2smi7a1_jqNtK4TEyfZ7b96M5xFyCuwDMKY-JsZKwQsGquBC8eL-BVnBgoAQ8iVZZQIKyaE6IW9SumX5LRV_TU645rrWtVyRhyvrpzEm2oW2nzH4LlxT29xgzHfMKN1821IbGvrbHhKdRtoNuzjuccAwXdAfmOZ-SnRsqaU7O3UZLZrY7THQNMc9HhaKy7J6YpdOtBLUj3OYYofpLXnV2j7hu8dzTX5dXf7cfCm23z9_3XzaFr4Ueiqcdl7z_OvS2UZCU_pWN6wBrWohnVZgOdfMirqsnfNVpTRzIJ3iNVQMtRNrcn70zePfzZgmM3TJY9_bgOOcTHZSkitdQZa-_0d6O84x5OkM1MBLJXhe_JrAUeXjmFLE1uxiN9h4MMDMko855mPy2s2Sj7nPNWePzrMbsHmueAokC_hRkDIVrjH-1fq_rn8AvHyajQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1912473204</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Factors influencing adherence in CML and ways to improvement: Results of a patient-driven survey of 2546 patients in 63 countries</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Springer Online Journals Complete</source><creator>Geissler, Jan ; Sharf, Giora ; Bombaci, Felice ; Daban, Mina ; De Jong, Jan ; Gavin, Tony ; Pelouchova, Jana ; Dziwinski, Euzebiusz ; Hasford, Joerg ; Hoffmann, Verena Sophia</creator><creatorcontrib>Geissler, Jan ; Sharf, Giora ; Bombaci, Felice ; Daban, Mina ; De Jong, Jan ; Gavin, Tony ; Pelouchova, Jana ; Dziwinski, Euzebiusz ; Hasford, Joerg ; Hoffmann, Verena Sophia</creatorcontrib><description>Optimal adherence to CML therapy is of key importance to maximize treatment effectiveness. Two clinical studies (ADAGIO and Hammersmith) have proven a clear correlation between adherence and achieving optimal treatment response and have revealed that non-adherence is common in CML patients (Marin et al. in J Clin Oncol 28(24):2381–2388,
2010
, Noens et al. in Haematologica 99(33):437–447,
2014
). The aim of this study is to assess the extent of suboptimal adherence and to investigate motivations and behavioural patterns of adherence in a worldwide patient sample. Questionnaires were provided by the CML Advocates Network and were filled in by patients online and offline. Patient characteristics, treatment and motivations were collected. Adherence was assessed by the 8-item Morisky Medication Adherence scale. Logistic regression models were fitted to investigate the influence of different factors on adherence. Overall, 2 546 questionnaires from 63 countries and 79 CML patient organisations were evaluable. 32.7% of participants were highly adherent, 46.5% were in the medium and 20.7% in the low adherence group. Factors increasing the probability of being in the high adherence group are older age, male sex, management of side effects, only one tablet per day and feeling well informed about CML by the doctor. More than 2 years since diagnosis were significantly lowering the chance as was the use of reminding tools. Living arrangements, multiple medication and personal payment obligations increased the probability to be at least in the medium adherent group. This is the most comprehensive study conducted to date to gain knowledge about factors causing non-adherence in CML. Better information on the disease, medication and management of side effects, supported by haematologists, is key to improve adherence.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0171-5216</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1432-1335</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s00432-017-2372-z</identifier><identifier>PMID: 28289895</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Berlin/Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg</publisher><subject>Adolescent ; Adult ; Age Factors ; Aged ; Aged, 80 and over ; Antineoplastic Agents - therapeutic use ; Cancer Research ; Cancer therapies ; Female ; Health behavior ; Hematology ; Humans ; Internal Medicine ; Internet ; Inventories ; Leukemia ; Leukemia, Myelogenous, Chronic, BCR-ABL Positive - drug therapy ; Male ; Medication Adherence - statistics & numerical data ; Medicine ; Medicine & Public Health ; Middle Aged ; Oncology ; Original Article – Cancer Research ; Patient compliance ; Regression analysis ; Sex Factors ; Side effects ; Surveys and Questionnaires ; Young Adult</subject><ispartof>Journal of cancer research and clinical oncology, 2017-07, Vol.143 (7), p.1167-1176</ispartof><rights>Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2017</rights><rights>Journal of Cancer Research and Clinical Oncology is a copyright of Springer, 2017.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c438t-b8bc820074bad51d4cf8d0d187935b871a2280a3949bbc66780b15b729160e8b3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c438t-b8bc820074bad51d4cf8d0d187935b871a2280a3949bbc66780b15b729160e8b3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s00432-017-2372-z$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1007/s00432-017-2372-z$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925,41488,42557,51319</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28289895$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Geissler, Jan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sharf, Giora</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bombaci, Felice</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Daban, Mina</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>De Jong, Jan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gavin, Tony</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pelouchova, Jana</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dziwinski, Euzebiusz</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hasford, Joerg</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hoffmann, Verena Sophia</creatorcontrib><title>Factors influencing adherence in CML and ways to improvement: Results of a patient-driven survey of 2546 patients in 63 countries</title><title>Journal of cancer research and clinical oncology</title><addtitle>J Cancer Res Clin Oncol</addtitle><addtitle>J Cancer Res Clin Oncol</addtitle><description>Optimal adherence to CML therapy is of key importance to maximize treatment effectiveness. Two clinical studies (ADAGIO and Hammersmith) have proven a clear correlation between adherence and achieving optimal treatment response and have revealed that non-adherence is common in CML patients (Marin et al. in J Clin Oncol 28(24):2381–2388,
2010
, Noens et al. in Haematologica 99(33):437–447,
2014
). The aim of this study is to assess the extent of suboptimal adherence and to investigate motivations and behavioural patterns of adherence in a worldwide patient sample. Questionnaires were provided by the CML Advocates Network and were filled in by patients online and offline. Patient characteristics, treatment and motivations were collected. Adherence was assessed by the 8-item Morisky Medication Adherence scale. Logistic regression models were fitted to investigate the influence of different factors on adherence. Overall, 2 546 questionnaires from 63 countries and 79 CML patient organisations were evaluable. 32.7% of participants were highly adherent, 46.5% were in the medium and 20.7% in the low adherence group. Factors increasing the probability of being in the high adherence group are older age, male sex, management of side effects, only one tablet per day and feeling well informed about CML by the doctor. More than 2 years since diagnosis were significantly lowering the chance as was the use of reminding tools. Living arrangements, multiple medication and personal payment obligations increased the probability to be at least in the medium adherent group. This is the most comprehensive study conducted to date to gain knowledge about factors causing non-adherence in CML. Better information on the disease, medication and management of side effects, supported by haematologists, is key to improve adherence.</description><subject>Adolescent</subject><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Age Factors</subject><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Aged, 80 and over</subject><subject>Antineoplastic Agents - therapeutic use</subject><subject>Cancer Research</subject><subject>Cancer therapies</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Health behavior</subject><subject>Hematology</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Internal Medicine</subject><subject>Internet</subject><subject>Inventories</subject><subject>Leukemia</subject><subject>Leukemia, Myelogenous, Chronic, BCR-ABL Positive - drug therapy</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Medication Adherence - statistics & numerical data</subject><subject>Medicine</subject><subject>Medicine & Public Health</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Oncology</subject><subject>Original Article – Cancer Research</subject><subject>Patient compliance</subject><subject>Regression analysis</subject><subject>Sex Factors</subject><subject>Side effects</subject><subject>Surveys and Questionnaires</subject><subject>Young Adult</subject><issn>0171-5216</issn><issn>1432-1335</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2017</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNp1UcFu1DAQtRCILgsf0EtliUsvAY8dx05vaNUC0iIkBGfLdiZtqsTZ2smi7a1_jqNtK4TEyfZ7b96M5xFyCuwDMKY-JsZKwQsGquBC8eL-BVnBgoAQ8iVZZQIKyaE6IW9SumX5LRV_TU645rrWtVyRhyvrpzEm2oW2nzH4LlxT29xgzHfMKN1821IbGvrbHhKdRtoNuzjuccAwXdAfmOZ-SnRsqaU7O3UZLZrY7THQNMc9HhaKy7J6YpdOtBLUj3OYYofpLXnV2j7hu8dzTX5dXf7cfCm23z9_3XzaFr4Ueiqcdl7z_OvS2UZCU_pWN6wBrWohnVZgOdfMirqsnfNVpTRzIJ3iNVQMtRNrcn70zePfzZgmM3TJY9_bgOOcTHZSkitdQZa-_0d6O84x5OkM1MBLJXhe_JrAUeXjmFLE1uxiN9h4MMDMko855mPy2s2Sj7nPNWePzrMbsHmueAokC_hRkDIVrjH-1fq_rn8AvHyajQ</recordid><startdate>20170701</startdate><enddate>20170701</enddate><creator>Geissler, Jan</creator><creator>Sharf, Giora</creator><creator>Bombaci, Felice</creator><creator>Daban, Mina</creator><creator>De Jong, Jan</creator><creator>Gavin, Tony</creator><creator>Pelouchova, Jana</creator><creator>Dziwinski, Euzebiusz</creator><creator>Hasford, Joerg</creator><creator>Hoffmann, Verena Sophia</creator><general>Springer Berlin Heidelberg</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7TO</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8C1</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20170701</creationdate><title>Factors influencing adherence in CML and ways to improvement: Results of a patient-driven survey of 2546 patients in 63 countries</title><author>Geissler, Jan ; Sharf, Giora ; Bombaci, Felice ; Daban, Mina ; De Jong, Jan ; Gavin, Tony ; Pelouchova, Jana ; Dziwinski, Euzebiusz ; Hasford, Joerg ; Hoffmann, Verena Sophia</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c438t-b8bc820074bad51d4cf8d0d187935b871a2280a3949bbc66780b15b729160e8b3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2017</creationdate><topic>Adolescent</topic><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Age Factors</topic><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Aged, 80 and over</topic><topic>Antineoplastic Agents - therapeutic use</topic><topic>Cancer Research</topic><topic>Cancer therapies</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Health behavior</topic><topic>Hematology</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Internal Medicine</topic><topic>Internet</topic><topic>Inventories</topic><topic>Leukemia</topic><topic>Leukemia, Myelogenous, Chronic, BCR-ABL Positive - drug therapy</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Medication Adherence - statistics & numerical data</topic><topic>Medicine</topic><topic>Medicine & Public Health</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Oncology</topic><topic>Original Article – Cancer Research</topic><topic>Patient compliance</topic><topic>Regression analysis</topic><topic>Sex Factors</topic><topic>Side effects</topic><topic>Surveys and Questionnaires</topic><topic>Young Adult</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Geissler, Jan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sharf, Giora</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bombaci, Felice</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Daban, Mina</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>De Jong, Jan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gavin, Tony</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pelouchova, Jana</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dziwinski, Euzebiusz</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hasford, Joerg</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hoffmann, Verena Sophia</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Oncogenes and Growth Factors Abstracts</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Public Health Database</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of cancer research and clinical oncology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Geissler, Jan</au><au>Sharf, Giora</au><au>Bombaci, Felice</au><au>Daban, Mina</au><au>De Jong, Jan</au><au>Gavin, Tony</au><au>Pelouchova, Jana</au><au>Dziwinski, Euzebiusz</au><au>Hasford, Joerg</au><au>Hoffmann, Verena Sophia</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Factors influencing adherence in CML and ways to improvement: Results of a patient-driven survey of 2546 patients in 63 countries</atitle><jtitle>Journal of cancer research and clinical oncology</jtitle><stitle>J Cancer Res Clin Oncol</stitle><addtitle>J Cancer Res Clin Oncol</addtitle><date>2017-07-01</date><risdate>2017</risdate><volume>143</volume><issue>7</issue><spage>1167</spage><epage>1176</epage><pages>1167-1176</pages><issn>0171-5216</issn><eissn>1432-1335</eissn><abstract>Optimal adherence to CML therapy is of key importance to maximize treatment effectiveness. Two clinical studies (ADAGIO and Hammersmith) have proven a clear correlation between adherence and achieving optimal treatment response and have revealed that non-adherence is common in CML patients (Marin et al. in J Clin Oncol 28(24):2381–2388,
2010
, Noens et al. in Haematologica 99(33):437–447,
2014
). The aim of this study is to assess the extent of suboptimal adherence and to investigate motivations and behavioural patterns of adherence in a worldwide patient sample. Questionnaires were provided by the CML Advocates Network and were filled in by patients online and offline. Patient characteristics, treatment and motivations were collected. Adherence was assessed by the 8-item Morisky Medication Adherence scale. Logistic regression models were fitted to investigate the influence of different factors on adherence. Overall, 2 546 questionnaires from 63 countries and 79 CML patient organisations were evaluable. 32.7% of participants were highly adherent, 46.5% were in the medium and 20.7% in the low adherence group. Factors increasing the probability of being in the high adherence group are older age, male sex, management of side effects, only one tablet per day and feeling well informed about CML by the doctor. More than 2 years since diagnosis were significantly lowering the chance as was the use of reminding tools. Living arrangements, multiple medication and personal payment obligations increased the probability to be at least in the medium adherent group. This is the most comprehensive study conducted to date to gain knowledge about factors causing non-adherence in CML. Better information on the disease, medication and management of side effects, supported by haematologists, is key to improve adherence.</abstract><cop>Berlin/Heidelberg</cop><pub>Springer Berlin Heidelberg</pub><pmid>28289895</pmid><doi>10.1007/s00432-017-2372-z</doi><tpages>10</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0171-5216 |
ispartof | Journal of cancer research and clinical oncology, 2017-07, Vol.143 (7), p.1167-1176 |
issn | 0171-5216 1432-1335 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1877527861 |
source | MEDLINE; Springer Online Journals Complete |
subjects | Adolescent Adult Age Factors Aged Aged, 80 and over Antineoplastic Agents - therapeutic use Cancer Research Cancer therapies Female Health behavior Hematology Humans Internal Medicine Internet Inventories Leukemia Leukemia, Myelogenous, Chronic, BCR-ABL Positive - drug therapy Male Medication Adherence - statistics & numerical data Medicine Medicine & Public Health Middle Aged Oncology Original Article – Cancer Research Patient compliance Regression analysis Sex Factors Side effects Surveys and Questionnaires Young Adult |
title | Factors influencing adherence in CML and ways to improvement: Results of a patient-driven survey of 2546 patients in 63 countries |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-04T01%3A39%3A50IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Factors%20influencing%20adherence%20in%20CML%20and%20ways%20to%20improvement:%20Results%20of%20a%20patient-driven%20survey%20of%202546%20patients%20in%2063%20countries&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20cancer%20research%20and%20clinical%20oncology&rft.au=Geissler,%20Jan&rft.date=2017-07-01&rft.volume=143&rft.issue=7&rft.spage=1167&rft.epage=1176&rft.pages=1167-1176&rft.issn=0171-5216&rft.eissn=1432-1335&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s00432-017-2372-z&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1912473204%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1912473204&rft_id=info:pmid/28289895&rfr_iscdi=true |