Improving Surgical Complications and Patient Safety at the Nation's Largest Military Hospital: An Analysis of National Surgical Quality Improvement Program Data
The U.S. Military Health System cares for over 9 million patients and encompasses 63 hospitals and 413 clinics worldwide. Military medicine balances the simultaneous tasks of caring for those patients wounded in military engagements, treating large numbers of families of service men and women, and t...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Military medicine 2017-03, Vol.182 (3), p.e1752-e1755 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | e1755 |
---|---|
container_issue | 3 |
container_start_page | e1752 |
container_title | Military medicine |
container_volume | 182 |
creator | Maturo, Steve Hughes, Charlotte Kallingal, George Silvey, Stephen Johnson, A J Soderdahl, Douglas Renz, Evan Brennan, Joseph |
description | The U.S. Military Health System cares for over 9 million patients and encompasses 63 hospitals and 413 clinics worldwide. Military medicine balances the simultaneous tasks of caring for those patients wounded in military engagements, treating large numbers of families of service men and women, and training the next generation of health care providers and ancillary staff. Similar to civilian health care delivery in the United States, military medicine has also seen increased scrutiny in the areas of cost and quality. In 2014, the U.S. military medical health care system was criticized for higher than average surgical complication rates and concerns regarding patient safety, quality of care, lack of transparency, and compartmentalized leadership. The San Antonio Military Medical Center was specifically cited as having "a perennial problem with surgical infection control…the infection rate of surgical wounds was 77% higher than expected given the mix of cases, according to a Pentagon-ordered comparison with civilian hospitals." To determine the scope of complication rates, data from the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (ACS NSQIP) were analyzed. The goal of this article is to describe the NSQIP surgical outcome data for the U.S. Military's largest medical center from 2009 to 2014 and compare national averages in the areas of mortality, morbidity, cardiac occurrences, pneumonia, unplanned intubation, ventilator use greater than 48 hours, infections, readmissions, and return to operating room.
Retrospective data analysis of NSQIP data from 2009 to 2014 at the San Antonio Military Medical Center, a level I trauma center for military members and eligible dependents along with civilian trauma patients. Observed event rates were compared with expected event rates for each year with the 2-tail Fisher's exact test to determine if rates were significantly different from each other. Cochran-Armitage Trend Test was performed to compare trends in time for the observed event rates. This study was exempt from institutional review board Approval.
Complication rates remained stable or decreased over the 5 years studied. Significant improvement in morbidity and surgical site infections were observed during the observation period. All other variables except urinary tract infections were within expected range or decreased during this time. Urinary tract infection rates, although decreasing, remain above the expected value.
NSQIP data at |
doi_str_mv | 10.7205/MILMED-D-16-00220 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1877527579</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>4320503551</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c372t-e5e232c7bfb6da47ad32efc6d3769c49097f99420c2cb5231b6d830a7bd15fe53</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpdkctKAzEUhoMoWi8P4EYCLnQzmstk0riT1kuh1YoK7kImk6kjM5OaZIS-jY9qetGFEMghfP_5z8kPwDFGF5wgdjkZjSc3w2SY4CxBiBC0BXpYUJRkmL5tg158y5IUcbYH9r3_QAinoo93wR7pE4EES3vge9TMnf2q2hl87tys0qqGA9vM61iFyrYeqraA01ibNsBnVZqwgCrA8G7gw4o483Cs3Mz4ACdVXQXlFvDe-nms6it43caj6oWvPLTlRhI9_syeOhVFC7iewzRLm6mzM6caOFRBHYKdUtXeHG3uA_B6e_MyuE_Gj3ejwfU40ZSTkBhmCCWa52WeFSrlqqDElDorKM-ETuO2vBQiJUgTnTNCccT6FCmeF5iVhtEDcL7uG8f47OI2sqm8NnWtWmM7L3Gfc0Y44yKip__QD9u5uNWKyrhgmKWRwmtKO-u9M6Wcu6qJvyMxksv45Do-OZQ4k6v4ouZk07nLG1P8KX7zoj8nEph1</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1876795154</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Improving Surgical Complications and Patient Safety at the Nation's Largest Military Hospital: An Analysis of National Surgical Quality Improvement Program Data</title><source>Oxford University Press Journals All Titles (1996-Current)</source><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><creator>Maturo, Steve ; Hughes, Charlotte ; Kallingal, George ; Silvey, Stephen ; Johnson, A J ; Soderdahl, Douglas ; Renz, Evan ; Brennan, Joseph</creator><creatorcontrib>Maturo, Steve ; Hughes, Charlotte ; Kallingal, George ; Silvey, Stephen ; Johnson, A J ; Soderdahl, Douglas ; Renz, Evan ; Brennan, Joseph</creatorcontrib><description>The U.S. Military Health System cares for over 9 million patients and encompasses 63 hospitals and 413 clinics worldwide. Military medicine balances the simultaneous tasks of caring for those patients wounded in military engagements, treating large numbers of families of service men and women, and training the next generation of health care providers and ancillary staff. Similar to civilian health care delivery in the United States, military medicine has also seen increased scrutiny in the areas of cost and quality. In 2014, the U.S. military medical health care system was criticized for higher than average surgical complication rates and concerns regarding patient safety, quality of care, lack of transparency, and compartmentalized leadership. The San Antonio Military Medical Center was specifically cited as having "a perennial problem with surgical infection control…the infection rate of surgical wounds was 77% higher than expected given the mix of cases, according to a Pentagon-ordered comparison with civilian hospitals." To determine the scope of complication rates, data from the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (ACS NSQIP) were analyzed. The goal of this article is to describe the NSQIP surgical outcome data for the U.S. Military's largest medical center from 2009 to 2014 and compare national averages in the areas of mortality, morbidity, cardiac occurrences, pneumonia, unplanned intubation, ventilator use greater than 48 hours, infections, readmissions, and return to operating room.
Retrospective data analysis of NSQIP data from 2009 to 2014 at the San Antonio Military Medical Center, a level I trauma center for military members and eligible dependents along with civilian trauma patients. Observed event rates were compared with expected event rates for each year with the 2-tail Fisher's exact test to determine if rates were significantly different from each other. Cochran-Armitage Trend Test was performed to compare trends in time for the observed event rates. This study was exempt from institutional review board Approval.
Complication rates remained stable or decreased over the 5 years studied. Significant improvement in morbidity and surgical site infections were observed during the observation period. All other variables except urinary tract infections were within expected range or decreased during this time. Urinary tract infection rates, although decreasing, remain above the expected value.
NSQIP data at the Department of Defense's largest hospital reveals complication rates similar to civilian hospitals. The majority of areas studied revealed improving or stable complication rates. The ACS NSQIP is a nationally validated, risk-adjusted, outcomes program that is widely used by many leading hospital institutions. Similar to most quality data reporting articles, a weakness of our study may have been collection of all complications. Yet, we are confident that the majority of complications were captured as we have dedicated personnel monitoring the adverse events measured by ACS NSQIP. Future areas of study should focus on continued analysis of surgical quality improvement within the entire military system.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0026-4075</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1930-613X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.7205/MILMED-D-16-00220</identifier><identifier>PMID: 28290954</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: Oxford University Press</publisher><subject>Hospital Mortality - trends ; Hospitals, Military - standards ; Hospitals, Military - statistics & numerical data ; Humans ; Patient Safety - statistics & numerical data ; Postoperative Complications - epidemiology ; Program Evaluation - methods ; Quality Improvement ; Quality Indicators, Health Care - statistics & numerical data ; Retrospective Studies ; Surgical Wound Infection - epidemiology ; United States - epidemiology</subject><ispartof>Military medicine, 2017-03, Vol.182 (3), p.e1752-e1755</ispartof><rights>Reprint & Copyright © 2017 Association of Military Surgeons of the U.S.</rights><rights>Copyright Association of Military Surgeons of the United States Mar/Apr 2017</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c372t-e5e232c7bfb6da47ad32efc6d3769c49097f99420c2cb5231b6d830a7bd15fe53</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28290954$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Maturo, Steve</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hughes, Charlotte</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kallingal, George</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Silvey, Stephen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Johnson, A J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Soderdahl, Douglas</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Renz, Evan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Brennan, Joseph</creatorcontrib><title>Improving Surgical Complications and Patient Safety at the Nation's Largest Military Hospital: An Analysis of National Surgical Quality Improvement Program Data</title><title>Military medicine</title><addtitle>Mil Med</addtitle><description>The U.S. Military Health System cares for over 9 million patients and encompasses 63 hospitals and 413 clinics worldwide. Military medicine balances the simultaneous tasks of caring for those patients wounded in military engagements, treating large numbers of families of service men and women, and training the next generation of health care providers and ancillary staff. Similar to civilian health care delivery in the United States, military medicine has also seen increased scrutiny in the areas of cost and quality. In 2014, the U.S. military medical health care system was criticized for higher than average surgical complication rates and concerns regarding patient safety, quality of care, lack of transparency, and compartmentalized leadership. The San Antonio Military Medical Center was specifically cited as having "a perennial problem with surgical infection control…the infection rate of surgical wounds was 77% higher than expected given the mix of cases, according to a Pentagon-ordered comparison with civilian hospitals." To determine the scope of complication rates, data from the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (ACS NSQIP) were analyzed. The goal of this article is to describe the NSQIP surgical outcome data for the U.S. Military's largest medical center from 2009 to 2014 and compare national averages in the areas of mortality, morbidity, cardiac occurrences, pneumonia, unplanned intubation, ventilator use greater than 48 hours, infections, readmissions, and return to operating room.
Retrospective data analysis of NSQIP data from 2009 to 2014 at the San Antonio Military Medical Center, a level I trauma center for military members and eligible dependents along with civilian trauma patients. Observed event rates were compared with expected event rates for each year with the 2-tail Fisher's exact test to determine if rates were significantly different from each other. Cochran-Armitage Trend Test was performed to compare trends in time for the observed event rates. This study was exempt from institutional review board Approval.
Complication rates remained stable or decreased over the 5 years studied. Significant improvement in morbidity and surgical site infections were observed during the observation period. All other variables except urinary tract infections were within expected range or decreased during this time. Urinary tract infection rates, although decreasing, remain above the expected value.
NSQIP data at the Department of Defense's largest hospital reveals complication rates similar to civilian hospitals. The majority of areas studied revealed improving or stable complication rates. The ACS NSQIP is a nationally validated, risk-adjusted, outcomes program that is widely used by many leading hospital institutions. Similar to most quality data reporting articles, a weakness of our study may have been collection of all complications. Yet, we are confident that the majority of complications were captured as we have dedicated personnel monitoring the adverse events measured by ACS NSQIP. Future areas of study should focus on continued analysis of surgical quality improvement within the entire military system.</description><subject>Hospital Mortality - trends</subject><subject>Hospitals, Military - standards</subject><subject>Hospitals, Military - statistics & numerical data</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Patient Safety - statistics & numerical data</subject><subject>Postoperative Complications - epidemiology</subject><subject>Program Evaluation - methods</subject><subject>Quality Improvement</subject><subject>Quality Indicators, Health Care - statistics & numerical data</subject><subject>Retrospective Studies</subject><subject>Surgical Wound Infection - epidemiology</subject><subject>United States - epidemiology</subject><issn>0026-4075</issn><issn>1930-613X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2017</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>BEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><recordid>eNpdkctKAzEUhoMoWi8P4EYCLnQzmstk0riT1kuh1YoK7kImk6kjM5OaZIS-jY9qetGFEMghfP_5z8kPwDFGF5wgdjkZjSc3w2SY4CxBiBC0BXpYUJRkmL5tg158y5IUcbYH9r3_QAinoo93wR7pE4EES3vge9TMnf2q2hl87tys0qqGA9vM61iFyrYeqraA01ibNsBnVZqwgCrA8G7gw4o483Cs3Mz4ACdVXQXlFvDe-nms6it43caj6oWvPLTlRhI9_syeOhVFC7iewzRLm6mzM6caOFRBHYKdUtXeHG3uA_B6e_MyuE_Gj3ejwfU40ZSTkBhmCCWa52WeFSrlqqDElDorKM-ETuO2vBQiJUgTnTNCccT6FCmeF5iVhtEDcL7uG8f47OI2sqm8NnWtWmM7L3Gfc0Y44yKip__QD9u5uNWKyrhgmKWRwmtKO-u9M6Wcu6qJvyMxksv45Do-OZQ4k6v4ouZk07nLG1P8KX7zoj8nEph1</recordid><startdate>201703</startdate><enddate>201703</enddate><creator>Maturo, Steve</creator><creator>Hughes, Charlotte</creator><creator>Kallingal, George</creator><creator>Silvey, Stephen</creator><creator>Johnson, A J</creator><creator>Soderdahl, Douglas</creator><creator>Renz, Evan</creator><creator>Brennan, Joseph</creator><general>Oxford University Press</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>4T-</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>88F</scope><scope>88G</scope><scope>88I</scope><scope>8AF</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8C1</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9-</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>M0R</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M1Q</scope><scope>M2M</scope><scope>M2P</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PSYQQ</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>S0X</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201703</creationdate><title>Improving Surgical Complications and Patient Safety at the Nation's Largest Military Hospital: An Analysis of National Surgical Quality Improvement Program Data</title><author>Maturo, Steve ; Hughes, Charlotte ; Kallingal, George ; Silvey, Stephen ; Johnson, A J ; Soderdahl, Douglas ; Renz, Evan ; Brennan, Joseph</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c372t-e5e232c7bfb6da47ad32efc6d3769c49097f99420c2cb5231b6d830a7bd15fe53</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2017</creationdate><topic>Hospital Mortality - trends</topic><topic>Hospitals, Military - standards</topic><topic>Hospitals, Military - statistics & numerical data</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Patient Safety - statistics & numerical data</topic><topic>Postoperative Complications - epidemiology</topic><topic>Program Evaluation - methods</topic><topic>Quality Improvement</topic><topic>Quality Indicators, Health Care - statistics & numerical data</topic><topic>Retrospective Studies</topic><topic>Surgical Wound Infection - epidemiology</topic><topic>United States - epidemiology</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Maturo, Steve</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hughes, Charlotte</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kallingal, George</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Silvey, Stephen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Johnson, A J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Soderdahl, Douglas</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Renz, Evan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Brennan, Joseph</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Docstoc</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Military Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Psychology Database (Alumni)</collection><collection>Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>STEM Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Public Health Database</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>eLibrary</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>Consumer Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Consumer Health Database</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Military Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Psychology</collection><collection>Science Database</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest One Psychology</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>SIRS Editorial</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Military medicine</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Maturo, Steve</au><au>Hughes, Charlotte</au><au>Kallingal, George</au><au>Silvey, Stephen</au><au>Johnson, A J</au><au>Soderdahl, Douglas</au><au>Renz, Evan</au><au>Brennan, Joseph</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Improving Surgical Complications and Patient Safety at the Nation's Largest Military Hospital: An Analysis of National Surgical Quality Improvement Program Data</atitle><jtitle>Military medicine</jtitle><addtitle>Mil Med</addtitle><date>2017-03</date><risdate>2017</risdate><volume>182</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>e1752</spage><epage>e1755</epage><pages>e1752-e1755</pages><issn>0026-4075</issn><eissn>1930-613X</eissn><abstract>The U.S. Military Health System cares for over 9 million patients and encompasses 63 hospitals and 413 clinics worldwide. Military medicine balances the simultaneous tasks of caring for those patients wounded in military engagements, treating large numbers of families of service men and women, and training the next generation of health care providers and ancillary staff. Similar to civilian health care delivery in the United States, military medicine has also seen increased scrutiny in the areas of cost and quality. In 2014, the U.S. military medical health care system was criticized for higher than average surgical complication rates and concerns regarding patient safety, quality of care, lack of transparency, and compartmentalized leadership. The San Antonio Military Medical Center was specifically cited as having "a perennial problem with surgical infection control…the infection rate of surgical wounds was 77% higher than expected given the mix of cases, according to a Pentagon-ordered comparison with civilian hospitals." To determine the scope of complication rates, data from the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (ACS NSQIP) were analyzed. The goal of this article is to describe the NSQIP surgical outcome data for the U.S. Military's largest medical center from 2009 to 2014 and compare national averages in the areas of mortality, morbidity, cardiac occurrences, pneumonia, unplanned intubation, ventilator use greater than 48 hours, infections, readmissions, and return to operating room.
Retrospective data analysis of NSQIP data from 2009 to 2014 at the San Antonio Military Medical Center, a level I trauma center for military members and eligible dependents along with civilian trauma patients. Observed event rates were compared with expected event rates for each year with the 2-tail Fisher's exact test to determine if rates were significantly different from each other. Cochran-Armitage Trend Test was performed to compare trends in time for the observed event rates. This study was exempt from institutional review board Approval.
Complication rates remained stable or decreased over the 5 years studied. Significant improvement in morbidity and surgical site infections were observed during the observation period. All other variables except urinary tract infections were within expected range or decreased during this time. Urinary tract infection rates, although decreasing, remain above the expected value.
NSQIP data at the Department of Defense's largest hospital reveals complication rates similar to civilian hospitals. The majority of areas studied revealed improving or stable complication rates. The ACS NSQIP is a nationally validated, risk-adjusted, outcomes program that is widely used by many leading hospital institutions. Similar to most quality data reporting articles, a weakness of our study may have been collection of all complications. Yet, we are confident that the majority of complications were captured as we have dedicated personnel monitoring the adverse events measured by ACS NSQIP. Future areas of study should focus on continued analysis of surgical quality improvement within the entire military system.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>Oxford University Press</pub><pmid>28290954</pmid><doi>10.7205/MILMED-D-16-00220</doi><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0026-4075 |
ispartof | Military medicine, 2017-03, Vol.182 (3), p.e1752-e1755 |
issn | 0026-4075 1930-613X |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1877527579 |
source | Oxford University Press Journals All Titles (1996-Current); MEDLINE; Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals |
subjects | Hospital Mortality - trends Hospitals, Military - standards Hospitals, Military - statistics & numerical data Humans Patient Safety - statistics & numerical data Postoperative Complications - epidemiology Program Evaluation - methods Quality Improvement Quality Indicators, Health Care - statistics & numerical data Retrospective Studies Surgical Wound Infection - epidemiology United States - epidemiology |
title | Improving Surgical Complications and Patient Safety at the Nation's Largest Military Hospital: An Analysis of National Surgical Quality Improvement Program Data |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-31T01%3A10%3A13IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Improving%20Surgical%20Complications%20and%20Patient%20Safety%20at%20the%20Nation's%20Largest%20Military%20Hospital:%20An%20Analysis%20of%20National%20Surgical%20Quality%20Improvement%20Program%20Data&rft.jtitle=Military%20medicine&rft.au=Maturo,%20Steve&rft.date=2017-03&rft.volume=182&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=e1752&rft.epage=e1755&rft.pages=e1752-e1755&rft.issn=0026-4075&rft.eissn=1930-613X&rft_id=info:doi/10.7205/MILMED-D-16-00220&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E4320503551%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1876795154&rft_id=info:pmid/28290954&rfr_iscdi=true |