Feasibility and short‐term impact of the “case study in‐house group training program for family nursing” at medical facilities

The aim of this study was to evaluate the feasibility and short‐term impact of case study training in family nursing care targeting midlevel nursing professionals. The intervention group participated in four 90‐minute case study training sessions over 6 months, while the control group participated i...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:International journal of nursing practice 2017-02, Vol.23 (1), p.e12503-n/a
Hauptverfasser: Yamazaki, Akemi, Tsumura, Akemi, Mine, Hiroko, Kimura, Chisato, Soeda, Akemi, Odatsu, Kazumi, Kiwado, Wataru
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page n/a
container_issue 1
container_start_page e12503
container_title International journal of nursing practice
container_volume 23
creator Yamazaki, Akemi
Tsumura, Akemi
Mine, Hiroko
Kimura, Chisato
Soeda, Akemi
Odatsu, Kazumi
Kiwado, Wataru
description The aim of this study was to evaluate the feasibility and short‐term impact of case study training in family nursing care targeting midlevel nursing professionals. The intervention group participated in four 90‐minute case study training sessions over 6 months, while the control group participated in two 90‐minute lectures. Using primary outcome variables as evaluation indexes, we measured the participants' total scores on the Family Importance in Nursing Care Scale and 4 subitems 3 times (before, immediately after and 1 month after training) from May 2014 to March 2015 and then conducted 2‐way repeated‐measure analysis of variance. We asked the participants and training planners/managers to provide feedback on their evaluation and then performed content analysis on their responses. Although the primary impact due to the different measurement times was significant, no significant difference was observed in the interaction between measurement time and training differences. Of the 4 subitems, significant interactions because of measurement time and training differences were observed only in Fam‐B. Feedback data showed all participants felt that their understanding of the importance of family nursing care was strengthened, and participants in the intervention group specifically described how they were utilizing what they had learned from training in practice. SUMMARY STATEMENT What is already known about this topic? The importance of involving families in health care has been evidenced in much of the literature and current guidelines. Case studies may serve as a good educational approach for family nursing. What this paper adds? The “Case Study In‐house Group Training Program for Family Nursing”, in which in‐hospital specialists and expert nurses teach midlevel staff nurses, led to better scores for attitudes toward family nursing than a family nursing training course by a visiting lecturer is new. The implications of this paper: Participants who received case study training specifically described how they were utilizing what they had learned from the training in practice, and did not tend to perceive the presence of families as a burden.
doi_str_mv 10.1111/ijn.12503
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1875835544</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>4315853431</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4523-c702213265c515630a8b4525f8c1389559573b4123e0e28b99976bdf1ac0971a3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkc1OGzEUha2Kqgm0i75AZYlNWQz4dzyzRKiBVAg2VOpu5HE8iaP5CbZHaHZZseYB4OXyJNwQ2gUSEt7YuvfTuff4IPSdkmMK58Qt22PKJOGf0JgKQRKq2N89eHPGEkWpGKH9EJaEQIHKL2jEVM4kF3KM7idWB1e62sUB63aGw6LzcbN-iNY32DUrbSLuKhwXFm_Wj0YHi0PsZwN2LVCLrofC3Hf9CkevXevaOV75bu51g6vO40o3rh5w2_sArc36CeuIGztzRtfQNNvBzoav6HOl62C_vd4H6M_k183ZRXJ5fT49O71MjJCMJ0YRxsBEKo2kMuVEZyU0ZJUZyrNcylwqXgrKuCWWZWWe5yotZxXVhuSKan6Afu50Ycfb3oZYNC4YW9e6tWCloJmSGZdSiA-gIlWwTZYBevgGXXa9b8HIVpAwkhJJgTraUcZ3IXhbFSvvGu2HgpJim2MBORYvOQL741WxL-G3_pP_ggPgZAfcudoO7ysV099XO8ln47GqBQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1870206051</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Feasibility and short‐term impact of the “case study in‐house group training program for family nursing” at medical facilities</title><source>Applied Social Sciences Index &amp; Abstracts (ASSIA)</source><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><creator>Yamazaki, Akemi ; Tsumura, Akemi ; Mine, Hiroko ; Kimura, Chisato ; Soeda, Akemi ; Odatsu, Kazumi ; Kiwado, Wataru</creator><creatorcontrib>Yamazaki, Akemi ; Tsumura, Akemi ; Mine, Hiroko ; Kimura, Chisato ; Soeda, Akemi ; Odatsu, Kazumi ; Kiwado, Wataru</creatorcontrib><description>The aim of this study was to evaluate the feasibility and short‐term impact of case study training in family nursing care targeting midlevel nursing professionals. The intervention group participated in four 90‐minute case study training sessions over 6 months, while the control group participated in two 90‐minute lectures. Using primary outcome variables as evaluation indexes, we measured the participants' total scores on the Family Importance in Nursing Care Scale and 4 subitems 3 times (before, immediately after and 1 month after training) from May 2014 to March 2015 and then conducted 2‐way repeated‐measure analysis of variance. We asked the participants and training planners/managers to provide feedback on their evaluation and then performed content analysis on their responses. Although the primary impact due to the different measurement times was significant, no significant difference was observed in the interaction between measurement time and training differences. Of the 4 subitems, significant interactions because of measurement time and training differences were observed only in Fam‐B. Feedback data showed all participants felt that their understanding of the importance of family nursing care was strengthened, and participants in the intervention group specifically described how they were utilizing what they had learned from training in practice. SUMMARY STATEMENT What is already known about this topic? The importance of involving families in health care has been evidenced in much of the literature and current guidelines. Case studies may serve as a good educational approach for family nursing. What this paper adds? The “Case Study In‐house Group Training Program for Family Nursing”, in which in‐hospital specialists and expert nurses teach midlevel staff nurses, led to better scores for attitudes toward family nursing than a family nursing training course by a visiting lecturer is new. The implications of this paper: Participants who received case study training specifically described how they were utilizing what they had learned from the training in practice, and did not tend to perceive the presence of families as a burden.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1322-7114</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1440-172X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/ijn.12503</identifier><identifier>PMID: 27925345</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Australia: Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</publisher><subject>Adult ; Case studies ; case study ; Clinical guidelines ; Content analysis ; continuing education ; Families &amp; family life ; family nursing ; Family Nursing - education ; Feasibility ; Feasibility Studies ; Feedback ; Female ; General practice ; Group Processes ; Health care ; Health Facilities ; Humans ; Inservice Training ; Interventions ; Lectures ; Male ; Measurement ; Nursing ; Nursing care ; Planners ; Professional training ; Program Evaluation ; Short term ; Specialists ; Staff nurses ; Training</subject><ispartof>International journal of nursing practice, 2017-02, Vol.23 (1), p.e12503-n/a</ispartof><rights>2016 John Wiley &amp; Sons Australia, Ltd</rights><rights>2016 John Wiley &amp; Sons Australia, Ltd.</rights><rights>2017 John Wiley &amp; Sons Australia, Ltd</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4523-c702213265c515630a8b4525f8c1389559573b4123e0e28b99976bdf1ac0971a3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4523-c702213265c515630a8b4525f8c1389559573b4123e0e28b99976bdf1ac0971a3</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-8564-1039</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111%2Fijn.12503$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111%2Fijn.12503$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,1411,27901,27902,30976,45550,45551</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27925345$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Yamazaki, Akemi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tsumura, Akemi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mine, Hiroko</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kimura, Chisato</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Soeda, Akemi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Odatsu, Kazumi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kiwado, Wataru</creatorcontrib><title>Feasibility and short‐term impact of the “case study in‐house group training program for family nursing” at medical facilities</title><title>International journal of nursing practice</title><addtitle>Int J Nurs Pract</addtitle><description>The aim of this study was to evaluate the feasibility and short‐term impact of case study training in family nursing care targeting midlevel nursing professionals. The intervention group participated in four 90‐minute case study training sessions over 6 months, while the control group participated in two 90‐minute lectures. Using primary outcome variables as evaluation indexes, we measured the participants' total scores on the Family Importance in Nursing Care Scale and 4 subitems 3 times (before, immediately after and 1 month after training) from May 2014 to March 2015 and then conducted 2‐way repeated‐measure analysis of variance. We asked the participants and training planners/managers to provide feedback on their evaluation and then performed content analysis on their responses. Although the primary impact due to the different measurement times was significant, no significant difference was observed in the interaction between measurement time and training differences. Of the 4 subitems, significant interactions because of measurement time and training differences were observed only in Fam‐B. Feedback data showed all participants felt that their understanding of the importance of family nursing care was strengthened, and participants in the intervention group specifically described how they were utilizing what they had learned from training in practice. SUMMARY STATEMENT What is already known about this topic? The importance of involving families in health care has been evidenced in much of the literature and current guidelines. Case studies may serve as a good educational approach for family nursing. What this paper adds? The “Case Study In‐house Group Training Program for Family Nursing”, in which in‐hospital specialists and expert nurses teach midlevel staff nurses, led to better scores for attitudes toward family nursing than a family nursing training course by a visiting lecturer is new. The implications of this paper: Participants who received case study training specifically described how they were utilizing what they had learned from the training in practice, and did not tend to perceive the presence of families as a burden.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Case studies</subject><subject>case study</subject><subject>Clinical guidelines</subject><subject>Content analysis</subject><subject>continuing education</subject><subject>Families &amp; family life</subject><subject>family nursing</subject><subject>Family Nursing - education</subject><subject>Feasibility</subject><subject>Feasibility Studies</subject><subject>Feedback</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>General practice</subject><subject>Group Processes</subject><subject>Health care</subject><subject>Health Facilities</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Inservice Training</subject><subject>Interventions</subject><subject>Lectures</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Measurement</subject><subject>Nursing</subject><subject>Nursing care</subject><subject>Planners</subject><subject>Professional training</subject><subject>Program Evaluation</subject><subject>Short term</subject><subject>Specialists</subject><subject>Staff nurses</subject><subject>Training</subject><issn>1322-7114</issn><issn>1440-172X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2017</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>7QJ</sourceid><recordid>eNqNkc1OGzEUha2Kqgm0i75AZYlNWQz4dzyzRKiBVAg2VOpu5HE8iaP5CbZHaHZZseYB4OXyJNwQ2gUSEt7YuvfTuff4IPSdkmMK58Qt22PKJOGf0JgKQRKq2N89eHPGEkWpGKH9EJaEQIHKL2jEVM4kF3KM7idWB1e62sUB63aGw6LzcbN-iNY32DUrbSLuKhwXFm_Wj0YHi0PsZwN2LVCLrofC3Hf9CkevXevaOV75bu51g6vO40o3rh5w2_sArc36CeuIGztzRtfQNNvBzoav6HOl62C_vd4H6M_k183ZRXJ5fT49O71MjJCMJ0YRxsBEKo2kMuVEZyU0ZJUZyrNcylwqXgrKuCWWZWWe5yotZxXVhuSKan6Afu50Ycfb3oZYNC4YW9e6tWCloJmSGZdSiA-gIlWwTZYBevgGXXa9b8HIVpAwkhJJgTraUcZ3IXhbFSvvGu2HgpJim2MBORYvOQL741WxL-G3_pP_ggPgZAfcudoO7ysV099XO8ln47GqBQ</recordid><startdate>201702</startdate><enddate>201702</enddate><creator>Yamazaki, Akemi</creator><creator>Tsumura, Akemi</creator><creator>Mine, Hiroko</creator><creator>Kimura, Chisato</creator><creator>Soeda, Akemi</creator><creator>Odatsu, Kazumi</creator><creator>Kiwado, Wataru</creator><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QJ</scope><scope>ASE</scope><scope>FPQ</scope><scope>K6X</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8564-1039</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>201702</creationdate><title>Feasibility and short‐term impact of the “case study in‐house group training program for family nursing” at medical facilities</title><author>Yamazaki, Akemi ; Tsumura, Akemi ; Mine, Hiroko ; Kimura, Chisato ; Soeda, Akemi ; Odatsu, Kazumi ; Kiwado, Wataru</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4523-c702213265c515630a8b4525f8c1389559573b4123e0e28b99976bdf1ac0971a3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2017</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Case studies</topic><topic>case study</topic><topic>Clinical guidelines</topic><topic>Content analysis</topic><topic>continuing education</topic><topic>Families &amp; family life</topic><topic>family nursing</topic><topic>Family Nursing - education</topic><topic>Feasibility</topic><topic>Feasibility Studies</topic><topic>Feedback</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>General practice</topic><topic>Group Processes</topic><topic>Health care</topic><topic>Health Facilities</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Inservice Training</topic><topic>Interventions</topic><topic>Lectures</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Measurement</topic><topic>Nursing</topic><topic>Nursing care</topic><topic>Planners</topic><topic>Professional training</topic><topic>Program Evaluation</topic><topic>Short term</topic><topic>Specialists</topic><topic>Staff nurses</topic><topic>Training</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Yamazaki, Akemi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tsumura, Akemi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mine, Hiroko</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kimura, Chisato</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Soeda, Akemi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Odatsu, Kazumi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kiwado, Wataru</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Applied Social Sciences Index &amp; Abstracts (ASSIA)</collection><collection>British Nursing Index</collection><collection>British Nursing Index (BNI) (1985 to Present)</collection><collection>British Nursing Index</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>International journal of nursing practice</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Yamazaki, Akemi</au><au>Tsumura, Akemi</au><au>Mine, Hiroko</au><au>Kimura, Chisato</au><au>Soeda, Akemi</au><au>Odatsu, Kazumi</au><au>Kiwado, Wataru</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Feasibility and short‐term impact of the “case study in‐house group training program for family nursing” at medical facilities</atitle><jtitle>International journal of nursing practice</jtitle><addtitle>Int J Nurs Pract</addtitle><date>2017-02</date><risdate>2017</risdate><volume>23</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>e12503</spage><epage>n/a</epage><pages>e12503-n/a</pages><issn>1322-7114</issn><eissn>1440-172X</eissn><abstract>The aim of this study was to evaluate the feasibility and short‐term impact of case study training in family nursing care targeting midlevel nursing professionals. The intervention group participated in four 90‐minute case study training sessions over 6 months, while the control group participated in two 90‐minute lectures. Using primary outcome variables as evaluation indexes, we measured the participants' total scores on the Family Importance in Nursing Care Scale and 4 subitems 3 times (before, immediately after and 1 month after training) from May 2014 to March 2015 and then conducted 2‐way repeated‐measure analysis of variance. We asked the participants and training planners/managers to provide feedback on their evaluation and then performed content analysis on their responses. Although the primary impact due to the different measurement times was significant, no significant difference was observed in the interaction between measurement time and training differences. Of the 4 subitems, significant interactions because of measurement time and training differences were observed only in Fam‐B. Feedback data showed all participants felt that their understanding of the importance of family nursing care was strengthened, and participants in the intervention group specifically described how they were utilizing what they had learned from training in practice. SUMMARY STATEMENT What is already known about this topic? The importance of involving families in health care has been evidenced in much of the literature and current guidelines. Case studies may serve as a good educational approach for family nursing. What this paper adds? The “Case Study In‐house Group Training Program for Family Nursing”, in which in‐hospital specialists and expert nurses teach midlevel staff nurses, led to better scores for attitudes toward family nursing than a family nursing training course by a visiting lecturer is new. The implications of this paper: Participants who received case study training specifically described how they were utilizing what they had learned from the training in practice, and did not tend to perceive the presence of families as a burden.</abstract><cop>Australia</cop><pub>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</pub><pmid>27925345</pmid><doi>10.1111/ijn.12503</doi><tpages>7</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8564-1039</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1322-7114
ispartof International journal of nursing practice, 2017-02, Vol.23 (1), p.e12503-n/a
issn 1322-7114
1440-172X
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1875835544
source Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA); MEDLINE; Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete
subjects Adult
Case studies
case study
Clinical guidelines
Content analysis
continuing education
Families & family life
family nursing
Family Nursing - education
Feasibility
Feasibility Studies
Feedback
Female
General practice
Group Processes
Health care
Health Facilities
Humans
Inservice Training
Interventions
Lectures
Male
Measurement
Nursing
Nursing care
Planners
Professional training
Program Evaluation
Short term
Specialists
Staff nurses
Training
title Feasibility and short‐term impact of the “case study in‐house group training program for family nursing” at medical facilities
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-31T04%3A51%3A10IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Feasibility%20and%20short%E2%80%90term%20impact%20of%20the%20%E2%80%9Ccase%20study%20in%E2%80%90house%20group%20training%20program%20for%20family%20nursing%E2%80%9D%20at%20medical%20facilities&rft.jtitle=International%20journal%20of%20nursing%20practice&rft.au=Yamazaki,%20Akemi&rft.date=2017-02&rft.volume=23&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=e12503&rft.epage=n/a&rft.pages=e12503-n/a&rft.issn=1322-7114&rft.eissn=1440-172X&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/ijn.12503&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E4315853431%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1870206051&rft_id=info:pmid/27925345&rfr_iscdi=true