Feasibility and short‐term impact of the “case study in‐house group training program for family nursing” at medical facilities
The aim of this study was to evaluate the feasibility and short‐term impact of case study training in family nursing care targeting midlevel nursing professionals. The intervention group participated in four 90‐minute case study training sessions over 6 months, while the control group participated i...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | International journal of nursing practice 2017-02, Vol.23 (1), p.e12503-n/a |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | n/a |
---|---|
container_issue | 1 |
container_start_page | e12503 |
container_title | International journal of nursing practice |
container_volume | 23 |
creator | Yamazaki, Akemi Tsumura, Akemi Mine, Hiroko Kimura, Chisato Soeda, Akemi Odatsu, Kazumi Kiwado, Wataru |
description | The aim of this study was to evaluate the feasibility and short‐term impact of case study training in family nursing care targeting midlevel nursing professionals. The intervention group participated in four 90‐minute case study training sessions over 6 months, while the control group participated in two 90‐minute lectures. Using primary outcome variables as evaluation indexes, we measured the participants' total scores on the Family Importance in Nursing Care Scale and 4 subitems 3 times (before, immediately after and 1 month after training) from May 2014 to March 2015 and then conducted 2‐way repeated‐measure analysis of variance. We asked the participants and training planners/managers to provide feedback on their evaluation and then performed content analysis on their responses. Although the primary impact due to the different measurement times was significant, no significant difference was observed in the interaction between measurement time and training differences. Of the 4 subitems, significant interactions because of measurement time and training differences were observed only in Fam‐B. Feedback data showed all participants felt that their understanding of the importance of family nursing care was strengthened, and participants in the intervention group specifically described how they were utilizing what they had learned from training in practice.
SUMMARY STATEMENT
What is already known about this topic?
The importance of involving families in health care has been evidenced in much of the literature and current guidelines.
Case studies may serve as a good educational approach for family nursing.
What this paper adds?
The “Case Study In‐house Group Training Program for Family Nursing”, in which in‐hospital specialists and expert nurses teach midlevel staff nurses, led to better scores for attitudes toward family nursing than a family nursing training course by a visiting lecturer is new.
The implications of this paper:
Participants who received case study training specifically described how they were utilizing what they had learned from the training in practice, and did not tend to perceive the presence of families as a burden. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1111/ijn.12503 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1875835544</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>4315853431</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4523-c702213265c515630a8b4525f8c1389559573b4123e0e28b99976bdf1ac0971a3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkc1OGzEUha2Kqgm0i75AZYlNWQz4dzyzRKiBVAg2VOpu5HE8iaP5CbZHaHZZseYB4OXyJNwQ2gUSEt7YuvfTuff4IPSdkmMK58Qt22PKJOGf0JgKQRKq2N89eHPGEkWpGKH9EJaEQIHKL2jEVM4kF3KM7idWB1e62sUB63aGw6LzcbN-iNY32DUrbSLuKhwXFm_Wj0YHi0PsZwN2LVCLrofC3Hf9CkevXevaOV75bu51g6vO40o3rh5w2_sArc36CeuIGztzRtfQNNvBzoav6HOl62C_vd4H6M_k183ZRXJ5fT49O71MjJCMJ0YRxsBEKo2kMuVEZyU0ZJUZyrNcylwqXgrKuCWWZWWe5yotZxXVhuSKan6Afu50Ycfb3oZYNC4YW9e6tWCloJmSGZdSiA-gIlWwTZYBevgGXXa9b8HIVpAwkhJJgTraUcZ3IXhbFSvvGu2HgpJim2MBORYvOQL741WxL-G3_pP_ggPgZAfcudoO7ysV099XO8ln47GqBQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1870206051</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Feasibility and short‐term impact of the “case study in‐house group training program for family nursing” at medical facilities</title><source>Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA)</source><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><creator>Yamazaki, Akemi ; Tsumura, Akemi ; Mine, Hiroko ; Kimura, Chisato ; Soeda, Akemi ; Odatsu, Kazumi ; Kiwado, Wataru</creator><creatorcontrib>Yamazaki, Akemi ; Tsumura, Akemi ; Mine, Hiroko ; Kimura, Chisato ; Soeda, Akemi ; Odatsu, Kazumi ; Kiwado, Wataru</creatorcontrib><description>The aim of this study was to evaluate the feasibility and short‐term impact of case study training in family nursing care targeting midlevel nursing professionals. The intervention group participated in four 90‐minute case study training sessions over 6 months, while the control group participated in two 90‐minute lectures. Using primary outcome variables as evaluation indexes, we measured the participants' total scores on the Family Importance in Nursing Care Scale and 4 subitems 3 times (before, immediately after and 1 month after training) from May 2014 to March 2015 and then conducted 2‐way repeated‐measure analysis of variance. We asked the participants and training planners/managers to provide feedback on their evaluation and then performed content analysis on their responses. Although the primary impact due to the different measurement times was significant, no significant difference was observed in the interaction between measurement time and training differences. Of the 4 subitems, significant interactions because of measurement time and training differences were observed only in Fam‐B. Feedback data showed all participants felt that their understanding of the importance of family nursing care was strengthened, and participants in the intervention group specifically described how they were utilizing what they had learned from training in practice.
SUMMARY STATEMENT
What is already known about this topic?
The importance of involving families in health care has been evidenced in much of the literature and current guidelines.
Case studies may serve as a good educational approach for family nursing.
What this paper adds?
The “Case Study In‐house Group Training Program for Family Nursing”, in which in‐hospital specialists and expert nurses teach midlevel staff nurses, led to better scores for attitudes toward family nursing than a family nursing training course by a visiting lecturer is new.
The implications of this paper:
Participants who received case study training specifically described how they were utilizing what they had learned from the training in practice, and did not tend to perceive the presence of families as a burden.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1322-7114</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1440-172X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/ijn.12503</identifier><identifier>PMID: 27925345</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Australia: Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</publisher><subject>Adult ; Case studies ; case study ; Clinical guidelines ; Content analysis ; continuing education ; Families & family life ; family nursing ; Family Nursing - education ; Feasibility ; Feasibility Studies ; Feedback ; Female ; General practice ; Group Processes ; Health care ; Health Facilities ; Humans ; Inservice Training ; Interventions ; Lectures ; Male ; Measurement ; Nursing ; Nursing care ; Planners ; Professional training ; Program Evaluation ; Short term ; Specialists ; Staff nurses ; Training</subject><ispartof>International journal of nursing practice, 2017-02, Vol.23 (1), p.e12503-n/a</ispartof><rights>2016 John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd</rights><rights>2016 John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd.</rights><rights>2017 John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4523-c702213265c515630a8b4525f8c1389559573b4123e0e28b99976bdf1ac0971a3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4523-c702213265c515630a8b4525f8c1389559573b4123e0e28b99976bdf1ac0971a3</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-8564-1039</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111%2Fijn.12503$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111%2Fijn.12503$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,1411,27901,27902,30976,45550,45551</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27925345$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Yamazaki, Akemi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tsumura, Akemi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mine, Hiroko</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kimura, Chisato</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Soeda, Akemi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Odatsu, Kazumi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kiwado, Wataru</creatorcontrib><title>Feasibility and short‐term impact of the “case study in‐house group training program for family nursing” at medical facilities</title><title>International journal of nursing practice</title><addtitle>Int J Nurs Pract</addtitle><description>The aim of this study was to evaluate the feasibility and short‐term impact of case study training in family nursing care targeting midlevel nursing professionals. The intervention group participated in four 90‐minute case study training sessions over 6 months, while the control group participated in two 90‐minute lectures. Using primary outcome variables as evaluation indexes, we measured the participants' total scores on the Family Importance in Nursing Care Scale and 4 subitems 3 times (before, immediately after and 1 month after training) from May 2014 to March 2015 and then conducted 2‐way repeated‐measure analysis of variance. We asked the participants and training planners/managers to provide feedback on their evaluation and then performed content analysis on their responses. Although the primary impact due to the different measurement times was significant, no significant difference was observed in the interaction between measurement time and training differences. Of the 4 subitems, significant interactions because of measurement time and training differences were observed only in Fam‐B. Feedback data showed all participants felt that their understanding of the importance of family nursing care was strengthened, and participants in the intervention group specifically described how they were utilizing what they had learned from training in practice.
SUMMARY STATEMENT
What is already known about this topic?
The importance of involving families in health care has been evidenced in much of the literature and current guidelines.
Case studies may serve as a good educational approach for family nursing.
What this paper adds?
The “Case Study In‐house Group Training Program for Family Nursing”, in which in‐hospital specialists and expert nurses teach midlevel staff nurses, led to better scores for attitudes toward family nursing than a family nursing training course by a visiting lecturer is new.
The implications of this paper:
Participants who received case study training specifically described how they were utilizing what they had learned from the training in practice, and did not tend to perceive the presence of families as a burden.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Case studies</subject><subject>case study</subject><subject>Clinical guidelines</subject><subject>Content analysis</subject><subject>continuing education</subject><subject>Families & family life</subject><subject>family nursing</subject><subject>Family Nursing - education</subject><subject>Feasibility</subject><subject>Feasibility Studies</subject><subject>Feedback</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>General practice</subject><subject>Group Processes</subject><subject>Health care</subject><subject>Health Facilities</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Inservice Training</subject><subject>Interventions</subject><subject>Lectures</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Measurement</subject><subject>Nursing</subject><subject>Nursing care</subject><subject>Planners</subject><subject>Professional training</subject><subject>Program Evaluation</subject><subject>Short term</subject><subject>Specialists</subject><subject>Staff nurses</subject><subject>Training</subject><issn>1322-7114</issn><issn>1440-172X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2017</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>7QJ</sourceid><recordid>eNqNkc1OGzEUha2Kqgm0i75AZYlNWQz4dzyzRKiBVAg2VOpu5HE8iaP5CbZHaHZZseYB4OXyJNwQ2gUSEt7YuvfTuff4IPSdkmMK58Qt22PKJOGf0JgKQRKq2N89eHPGEkWpGKH9EJaEQIHKL2jEVM4kF3KM7idWB1e62sUB63aGw6LzcbN-iNY32DUrbSLuKhwXFm_Wj0YHi0PsZwN2LVCLrofC3Hf9CkevXevaOV75bu51g6vO40o3rh5w2_sArc36CeuIGztzRtfQNNvBzoav6HOl62C_vd4H6M_k183ZRXJ5fT49O71MjJCMJ0YRxsBEKo2kMuVEZyU0ZJUZyrNcylwqXgrKuCWWZWWe5yotZxXVhuSKan6Afu50Ycfb3oZYNC4YW9e6tWCloJmSGZdSiA-gIlWwTZYBevgGXXa9b8HIVpAwkhJJgTraUcZ3IXhbFSvvGu2HgpJim2MBORYvOQL741WxL-G3_pP_ggPgZAfcudoO7ysV099XO8ln47GqBQ</recordid><startdate>201702</startdate><enddate>201702</enddate><creator>Yamazaki, Akemi</creator><creator>Tsumura, Akemi</creator><creator>Mine, Hiroko</creator><creator>Kimura, Chisato</creator><creator>Soeda, Akemi</creator><creator>Odatsu, Kazumi</creator><creator>Kiwado, Wataru</creator><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QJ</scope><scope>ASE</scope><scope>FPQ</scope><scope>K6X</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8564-1039</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>201702</creationdate><title>Feasibility and short‐term impact of the “case study in‐house group training program for family nursing” at medical facilities</title><author>Yamazaki, Akemi ; Tsumura, Akemi ; Mine, Hiroko ; Kimura, Chisato ; Soeda, Akemi ; Odatsu, Kazumi ; Kiwado, Wataru</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4523-c702213265c515630a8b4525f8c1389559573b4123e0e28b99976bdf1ac0971a3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2017</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Case studies</topic><topic>case study</topic><topic>Clinical guidelines</topic><topic>Content analysis</topic><topic>continuing education</topic><topic>Families & family life</topic><topic>family nursing</topic><topic>Family Nursing - education</topic><topic>Feasibility</topic><topic>Feasibility Studies</topic><topic>Feedback</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>General practice</topic><topic>Group Processes</topic><topic>Health care</topic><topic>Health Facilities</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Inservice Training</topic><topic>Interventions</topic><topic>Lectures</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Measurement</topic><topic>Nursing</topic><topic>Nursing care</topic><topic>Planners</topic><topic>Professional training</topic><topic>Program Evaluation</topic><topic>Short term</topic><topic>Specialists</topic><topic>Staff nurses</topic><topic>Training</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Yamazaki, Akemi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tsumura, Akemi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mine, Hiroko</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kimura, Chisato</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Soeda, Akemi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Odatsu, Kazumi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kiwado, Wataru</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA)</collection><collection>British Nursing Index</collection><collection>British Nursing Index (BNI) (1985 to Present)</collection><collection>British Nursing Index</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>International journal of nursing practice</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Yamazaki, Akemi</au><au>Tsumura, Akemi</au><au>Mine, Hiroko</au><au>Kimura, Chisato</au><au>Soeda, Akemi</au><au>Odatsu, Kazumi</au><au>Kiwado, Wataru</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Feasibility and short‐term impact of the “case study in‐house group training program for family nursing” at medical facilities</atitle><jtitle>International journal of nursing practice</jtitle><addtitle>Int J Nurs Pract</addtitle><date>2017-02</date><risdate>2017</risdate><volume>23</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>e12503</spage><epage>n/a</epage><pages>e12503-n/a</pages><issn>1322-7114</issn><eissn>1440-172X</eissn><abstract>The aim of this study was to evaluate the feasibility and short‐term impact of case study training in family nursing care targeting midlevel nursing professionals. The intervention group participated in four 90‐minute case study training sessions over 6 months, while the control group participated in two 90‐minute lectures. Using primary outcome variables as evaluation indexes, we measured the participants' total scores on the Family Importance in Nursing Care Scale and 4 subitems 3 times (before, immediately after and 1 month after training) from May 2014 to March 2015 and then conducted 2‐way repeated‐measure analysis of variance. We asked the participants and training planners/managers to provide feedback on their evaluation and then performed content analysis on their responses. Although the primary impact due to the different measurement times was significant, no significant difference was observed in the interaction between measurement time and training differences. Of the 4 subitems, significant interactions because of measurement time and training differences were observed only in Fam‐B. Feedback data showed all participants felt that their understanding of the importance of family nursing care was strengthened, and participants in the intervention group specifically described how they were utilizing what they had learned from training in practice.
SUMMARY STATEMENT
What is already known about this topic?
The importance of involving families in health care has been evidenced in much of the literature and current guidelines.
Case studies may serve as a good educational approach for family nursing.
What this paper adds?
The “Case Study In‐house Group Training Program for Family Nursing”, in which in‐hospital specialists and expert nurses teach midlevel staff nurses, led to better scores for attitudes toward family nursing than a family nursing training course by a visiting lecturer is new.
The implications of this paper:
Participants who received case study training specifically described how they were utilizing what they had learned from the training in practice, and did not tend to perceive the presence of families as a burden.</abstract><cop>Australia</cop><pub>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</pub><pmid>27925345</pmid><doi>10.1111/ijn.12503</doi><tpages>7</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8564-1039</orcidid></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1322-7114 |
ispartof | International journal of nursing practice, 2017-02, Vol.23 (1), p.e12503-n/a |
issn | 1322-7114 1440-172X |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1875835544 |
source | Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA); MEDLINE; Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete |
subjects | Adult Case studies case study Clinical guidelines Content analysis continuing education Families & family life family nursing Family Nursing - education Feasibility Feasibility Studies Feedback Female General practice Group Processes Health care Health Facilities Humans Inservice Training Interventions Lectures Male Measurement Nursing Nursing care Planners Professional training Program Evaluation Short term Specialists Staff nurses Training |
title | Feasibility and short‐term impact of the “case study in‐house group training program for family nursing” at medical facilities |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-31T04%3A51%3A10IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Feasibility%20and%20short%E2%80%90term%20impact%20of%20the%20%E2%80%9Ccase%20study%20in%E2%80%90house%20group%20training%20program%20for%20family%20nursing%E2%80%9D%20at%20medical%20facilities&rft.jtitle=International%20journal%20of%20nursing%20practice&rft.au=Yamazaki,%20Akemi&rft.date=2017-02&rft.volume=23&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=e12503&rft.epage=n/a&rft.pages=e12503-n/a&rft.issn=1322-7114&rft.eissn=1440-172X&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/ijn.12503&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E4315853431%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1870206051&rft_id=info:pmid/27925345&rfr_iscdi=true |