Optimizing cell‐free protein expression in CHO: Assessing small molecule mass transfer effects in various reactor configurations

ABSTRACT Cell‐free protein synthesis (CFPS) is an ideal platform for rapid and convenient protein production. However, bioreactor design remains a critical consideration in optimizing protein expression. Using turbo green fluorescent protein (tGFP) as a model, we tracked small molecule components in...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Biotechnology and bioengineering 2017-07, Vol.114 (7), p.1478-1486
Hauptverfasser: Peñalber‐Johnstone, Chariz, Ge, Xudong, Tran, Kevin, Selock, Nicholas, Sardesai, Neha, Gurramkonda, Chandrasekhar, Pilli, Manohar, Tolosa, Michael, Tolosa, Leah, Kostov, Yordan, Frey, Douglas D., Rao, Govind
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 1486
container_issue 7
container_start_page 1478
container_title Biotechnology and bioengineering
container_volume 114
creator Peñalber‐Johnstone, Chariz
Ge, Xudong
Tran, Kevin
Selock, Nicholas
Sardesai, Neha
Gurramkonda, Chandrasekhar
Pilli, Manohar
Tolosa, Michael
Tolosa, Leah
Kostov, Yordan
Frey, Douglas D.
Rao, Govind
description ABSTRACT Cell‐free protein synthesis (CFPS) is an ideal platform for rapid and convenient protein production. However, bioreactor design remains a critical consideration in optimizing protein expression. Using turbo green fluorescent protein (tGFP) as a model, we tracked small molecule components in a Chinese Hamster Ovary (CHO) CFPS system to optimize protein production. Here, three bioreactors in continuous‐exchange cell‐free (CECF) format were characterized. A GFP optical sensor was built to monitor the product in real‐time. Mass transfer of important substrate and by‐product components such as nucleoside triphosphates (NTPs), creatine, and inorganic phosphate (Pi) across a 10‐kDa MWCO cellulose membrane was calculated. The highest efficiency measured by tGFP yields were found in a microdialysis device configuration; while a negative effect on yield was observed due to limited mass transfer of NTPs in a dialysis cup configuration. In 24‐well plate high‐throughput CECF format, addition of up to 40 mM creatine phosphate in the system increased yields by up to ∼60% relative to controls. Direct ATP addition, as opposed to creatine phosphate addition, negatively affected the expression. Pi addition of up to 30 mM to the expression significantly reduced yields by over ∼40% relative to controls. Overall, data presented in this report serves as a valuable reference to optimize the CHO CFPS system for next‐generation bioprocessing. Biotechnol. Bioeng. 2017;114: 1478–1486. © 2017 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. By tracking the concentration of small molecule components such as nucleoside triphosphates, creatine, and inorganic phosphate in a CHO‐based cell‐free protein expression system, efficiency of mass transfer across a regenerated cellulose membrane in various off‐the‐shelf bioreactor devices was calculated. Results were directly correlated to yield, which provides a critical reference in the development of efficient strategies in bioreactor design to support the demonstrated potential of CHO‐based platforms for next‐generation bioprocessing.
doi_str_mv 10.1002/bit.26282
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1875142253</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1875142253</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3902-7c58f813c76ffe8b9b53b102877ed3fe4d5a969e6dbdfaee92d99c0bdee1f2d3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kctKxDAUhoMoOl4WvoAE3OiimqQ2bdyNgzcQZjP7kKYnEullzGm9rcQn8Bl9EjOOuhBchRO-8_EffkJ2OTvijInj0vdHQopCrJARZypPmFBslYwYYzJJMyU2yCbiXRzzQsp1shFRKZmQI_I2nfe-8S--vaUW6vrj9d0FADoPXQ--pfA0D4Dou5bGaXI1PaVjxMVPXMDG1DVtuhrsUANtDCLtg2nRQaDgHNgeF2sPJvhuQBrA2L4L1Hat87dDMH304jZZc6ZG2Pl-t8js4nw2uUpuppfXk_FNYlPFRJLbrHAFT20uo7koVZmlJWeiyHOoUgcnVWaUVCCrsnIGQIlKKcvKCoA7UaVb5GCpjafdD4C9bjwuTjYtxHCaF3nGT4TI0oju_0HvuiG0MZzmMQpPlcxYpA6XlA0dYgCn58E3JjxrzvSiFx170V-9RHbv2ziUDVS_5E8RETheAo--huf_TfrserZUfgL0mJtD</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1902139650</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Optimizing cell‐free protein expression in CHO: Assessing small molecule mass transfer effects in various reactor configurations</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Wiley Journals</source><creator>Peñalber‐Johnstone, Chariz ; Ge, Xudong ; Tran, Kevin ; Selock, Nicholas ; Sardesai, Neha ; Gurramkonda, Chandrasekhar ; Pilli, Manohar ; Tolosa, Michael ; Tolosa, Leah ; Kostov, Yordan ; Frey, Douglas D. ; Rao, Govind</creator><creatorcontrib>Peñalber‐Johnstone, Chariz ; Ge, Xudong ; Tran, Kevin ; Selock, Nicholas ; Sardesai, Neha ; Gurramkonda, Chandrasekhar ; Pilli, Manohar ; Tolosa, Michael ; Tolosa, Leah ; Kostov, Yordan ; Frey, Douglas D. ; Rao, Govind</creatorcontrib><description>ABSTRACT Cell‐free protein synthesis (CFPS) is an ideal platform for rapid and convenient protein production. However, bioreactor design remains a critical consideration in optimizing protein expression. Using turbo green fluorescent protein (tGFP) as a model, we tracked small molecule components in a Chinese Hamster Ovary (CHO) CFPS system to optimize protein production. Here, three bioreactors in continuous‐exchange cell‐free (CECF) format were characterized. A GFP optical sensor was built to monitor the product in real‐time. Mass transfer of important substrate and by‐product components such as nucleoside triphosphates (NTPs), creatine, and inorganic phosphate (Pi) across a 10‐kDa MWCO cellulose membrane was calculated. The highest efficiency measured by tGFP yields were found in a microdialysis device configuration; while a negative effect on yield was observed due to limited mass transfer of NTPs in a dialysis cup configuration. In 24‐well plate high‐throughput CECF format, addition of up to 40 mM creatine phosphate in the system increased yields by up to ∼60% relative to controls. Direct ATP addition, as opposed to creatine phosphate addition, negatively affected the expression. Pi addition of up to 30 mM to the expression significantly reduced yields by over ∼40% relative to controls. Overall, data presented in this report serves as a valuable reference to optimize the CHO CFPS system for next‐generation bioprocessing. Biotechnol. Bioeng. 2017;114: 1478–1486. © 2017 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. By tracking the concentration of small molecule components such as nucleoside triphosphates, creatine, and inorganic phosphate in a CHO‐based cell‐free protein expression system, efficiency of mass transfer across a regenerated cellulose membrane in various off‐the‐shelf bioreactor devices was calculated. Results were directly correlated to yield, which provides a critical reference in the development of efficient strategies in bioreactor design to support the demonstrated potential of CHO‐based platforms for next‐generation bioprocessing.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0006-3592</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1097-0290</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1002/bit.26282</identifier><identifier>PMID: 28266026</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</publisher><subject>Animals ; Bioengineering ; Bioprocessing ; Bioreactors ; Biotechnology ; Cell-Free System - metabolism ; Cellulose ; cell‐free protein synthesis ; Chemical synthesis ; Chinese hamster ovary cells ; CHO Cells - chemistry ; CHO Cells - metabolism ; Computing time ; continuous‐exchange cell‐free ; Creatine ; Cricetulus ; Design optimization ; Dialysis ; Fluorescence ; Format ; Green fluorescent protein ; in vitro protein expression ; Mass transfer ; Microdialysis ; Nucleoside triphosphates ; Phosphates ; Phosphocreatine ; Protein biosynthesis ; Protein Biosynthesis - physiology ; Protein Engineering - instrumentation ; Protein Engineering - methods ; Protein expression ; Protein synthesis ; Quality Control ; Yield</subject><ispartof>Biotechnology and bioengineering, 2017-07, Vol.114 (7), p.1478-1486</ispartof><rights>2017 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3902-7c58f813c76ffe8b9b53b102877ed3fe4d5a969e6dbdfaee92d99c0bdee1f2d3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3902-7c58f813c76ffe8b9b53b102877ed3fe4d5a969e6dbdfaee92d99c0bdee1f2d3</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-6140-7582</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002%2Fbit.26282$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002%2Fbit.26282$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,1417,27924,27925,45574,45575</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28266026$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Peñalber‐Johnstone, Chariz</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ge, Xudong</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tran, Kevin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Selock, Nicholas</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sardesai, Neha</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gurramkonda, Chandrasekhar</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pilli, Manohar</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tolosa, Michael</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tolosa, Leah</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kostov, Yordan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Frey, Douglas D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rao, Govind</creatorcontrib><title>Optimizing cell‐free protein expression in CHO: Assessing small molecule mass transfer effects in various reactor configurations</title><title>Biotechnology and bioengineering</title><addtitle>Biotechnol Bioeng</addtitle><description>ABSTRACT Cell‐free protein synthesis (CFPS) is an ideal platform for rapid and convenient protein production. However, bioreactor design remains a critical consideration in optimizing protein expression. Using turbo green fluorescent protein (tGFP) as a model, we tracked small molecule components in a Chinese Hamster Ovary (CHO) CFPS system to optimize protein production. Here, three bioreactors in continuous‐exchange cell‐free (CECF) format were characterized. A GFP optical sensor was built to monitor the product in real‐time. Mass transfer of important substrate and by‐product components such as nucleoside triphosphates (NTPs), creatine, and inorganic phosphate (Pi) across a 10‐kDa MWCO cellulose membrane was calculated. The highest efficiency measured by tGFP yields were found in a microdialysis device configuration; while a negative effect on yield was observed due to limited mass transfer of NTPs in a dialysis cup configuration. In 24‐well plate high‐throughput CECF format, addition of up to 40 mM creatine phosphate in the system increased yields by up to ∼60% relative to controls. Direct ATP addition, as opposed to creatine phosphate addition, negatively affected the expression. Pi addition of up to 30 mM to the expression significantly reduced yields by over ∼40% relative to controls. Overall, data presented in this report serves as a valuable reference to optimize the CHO CFPS system for next‐generation bioprocessing. Biotechnol. Bioeng. 2017;114: 1478–1486. © 2017 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. By tracking the concentration of small molecule components such as nucleoside triphosphates, creatine, and inorganic phosphate in a CHO‐based cell‐free protein expression system, efficiency of mass transfer across a regenerated cellulose membrane in various off‐the‐shelf bioreactor devices was calculated. Results were directly correlated to yield, which provides a critical reference in the development of efficient strategies in bioreactor design to support the demonstrated potential of CHO‐based platforms for next‐generation bioprocessing.</description><subject>Animals</subject><subject>Bioengineering</subject><subject>Bioprocessing</subject><subject>Bioreactors</subject><subject>Biotechnology</subject><subject>Cell-Free System - metabolism</subject><subject>Cellulose</subject><subject>cell‐free protein synthesis</subject><subject>Chemical synthesis</subject><subject>Chinese hamster ovary cells</subject><subject>CHO Cells - chemistry</subject><subject>CHO Cells - metabolism</subject><subject>Computing time</subject><subject>continuous‐exchange cell‐free</subject><subject>Creatine</subject><subject>Cricetulus</subject><subject>Design optimization</subject><subject>Dialysis</subject><subject>Fluorescence</subject><subject>Format</subject><subject>Green fluorescent protein</subject><subject>in vitro protein expression</subject><subject>Mass transfer</subject><subject>Microdialysis</subject><subject>Nucleoside triphosphates</subject><subject>Phosphates</subject><subject>Phosphocreatine</subject><subject>Protein biosynthesis</subject><subject>Protein Biosynthesis - physiology</subject><subject>Protein Engineering - instrumentation</subject><subject>Protein Engineering - methods</subject><subject>Protein expression</subject><subject>Protein synthesis</subject><subject>Quality Control</subject><subject>Yield</subject><issn>0006-3592</issn><issn>1097-0290</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2017</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kctKxDAUhoMoOl4WvoAE3OiimqQ2bdyNgzcQZjP7kKYnEullzGm9rcQn8Bl9EjOOuhBchRO-8_EffkJ2OTvijInj0vdHQopCrJARZypPmFBslYwYYzJJMyU2yCbiXRzzQsp1shFRKZmQI_I2nfe-8S--vaUW6vrj9d0FADoPXQ--pfA0D4Dou5bGaXI1PaVjxMVPXMDG1DVtuhrsUANtDCLtg2nRQaDgHNgeF2sPJvhuQBrA2L4L1Hat87dDMH304jZZc6ZG2Pl-t8js4nw2uUpuppfXk_FNYlPFRJLbrHAFT20uo7koVZmlJWeiyHOoUgcnVWaUVCCrsnIGQIlKKcvKCoA7UaVb5GCpjafdD4C9bjwuTjYtxHCaF3nGT4TI0oju_0HvuiG0MZzmMQpPlcxYpA6XlA0dYgCn58E3JjxrzvSiFx170V-9RHbv2ziUDVS_5E8RETheAo--huf_TfrserZUfgL0mJtD</recordid><startdate>201707</startdate><enddate>201707</enddate><creator>Peñalber‐Johnstone, Chariz</creator><creator>Ge, Xudong</creator><creator>Tran, Kevin</creator><creator>Selock, Nicholas</creator><creator>Sardesai, Neha</creator><creator>Gurramkonda, Chandrasekhar</creator><creator>Pilli, Manohar</creator><creator>Tolosa, Michael</creator><creator>Tolosa, Leah</creator><creator>Kostov, Yordan</creator><creator>Frey, Douglas D.</creator><creator>Rao, Govind</creator><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QF</scope><scope>7QO</scope><scope>7QQ</scope><scope>7SC</scope><scope>7SE</scope><scope>7SP</scope><scope>7SR</scope><scope>7T7</scope><scope>7TA</scope><scope>7TB</scope><scope>7U5</scope><scope>8BQ</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>F28</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>H8D</scope><scope>H8G</scope><scope>JG9</scope><scope>JQ2</scope><scope>KR7</scope><scope>L7M</scope><scope>L~C</scope><scope>L~D</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6140-7582</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>201707</creationdate><title>Optimizing cell‐free protein expression in CHO: Assessing small molecule mass transfer effects in various reactor configurations</title><author>Peñalber‐Johnstone, Chariz ; Ge, Xudong ; Tran, Kevin ; Selock, Nicholas ; Sardesai, Neha ; Gurramkonda, Chandrasekhar ; Pilli, Manohar ; Tolosa, Michael ; Tolosa, Leah ; Kostov, Yordan ; Frey, Douglas D. ; Rao, Govind</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3902-7c58f813c76ffe8b9b53b102877ed3fe4d5a969e6dbdfaee92d99c0bdee1f2d3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2017</creationdate><topic>Animals</topic><topic>Bioengineering</topic><topic>Bioprocessing</topic><topic>Bioreactors</topic><topic>Biotechnology</topic><topic>Cell-Free System - metabolism</topic><topic>Cellulose</topic><topic>cell‐free protein synthesis</topic><topic>Chemical synthesis</topic><topic>Chinese hamster ovary cells</topic><topic>CHO Cells - chemistry</topic><topic>CHO Cells - metabolism</topic><topic>Computing time</topic><topic>continuous‐exchange cell‐free</topic><topic>Creatine</topic><topic>Cricetulus</topic><topic>Design optimization</topic><topic>Dialysis</topic><topic>Fluorescence</topic><topic>Format</topic><topic>Green fluorescent protein</topic><topic>in vitro protein expression</topic><topic>Mass transfer</topic><topic>Microdialysis</topic><topic>Nucleoside triphosphates</topic><topic>Phosphates</topic><topic>Phosphocreatine</topic><topic>Protein biosynthesis</topic><topic>Protein Biosynthesis - physiology</topic><topic>Protein Engineering - instrumentation</topic><topic>Protein Engineering - methods</topic><topic>Protein expression</topic><topic>Protein synthesis</topic><topic>Quality Control</topic><topic>Yield</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Peñalber‐Johnstone, Chariz</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ge, Xudong</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tran, Kevin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Selock, Nicholas</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sardesai, Neha</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gurramkonda, Chandrasekhar</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pilli, Manohar</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tolosa, Michael</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tolosa, Leah</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kostov, Yordan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Frey, Douglas D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rao, Govind</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Aluminium Industry Abstracts</collection><collection>Biotechnology Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Ceramic Abstracts</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts</collection><collection>Corrosion Abstracts</collection><collection>Electronics &amp; Communications Abstracts</collection><collection>Engineered Materials Abstracts</collection><collection>Industrial and Applied Microbiology Abstracts (Microbiology A)</collection><collection>Materials Business File</collection><collection>Mechanical &amp; Transportation Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Solid State and Superconductivity Abstracts</collection><collection>METADEX</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ANTE: Abstracts in New Technology &amp; Engineering</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Aerospace Database</collection><collection>Copper Technical Reference Library</collection><collection>Materials Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Computer Science Collection</collection><collection>Civil Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts – Academic</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts Professional</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Biotechnology and bioengineering</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Peñalber‐Johnstone, Chariz</au><au>Ge, Xudong</au><au>Tran, Kevin</au><au>Selock, Nicholas</au><au>Sardesai, Neha</au><au>Gurramkonda, Chandrasekhar</au><au>Pilli, Manohar</au><au>Tolosa, Michael</au><au>Tolosa, Leah</au><au>Kostov, Yordan</au><au>Frey, Douglas D.</au><au>Rao, Govind</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Optimizing cell‐free protein expression in CHO: Assessing small molecule mass transfer effects in various reactor configurations</atitle><jtitle>Biotechnology and bioengineering</jtitle><addtitle>Biotechnol Bioeng</addtitle><date>2017-07</date><risdate>2017</risdate><volume>114</volume><issue>7</issue><spage>1478</spage><epage>1486</epage><pages>1478-1486</pages><issn>0006-3592</issn><eissn>1097-0290</eissn><abstract>ABSTRACT Cell‐free protein synthesis (CFPS) is an ideal platform for rapid and convenient protein production. However, bioreactor design remains a critical consideration in optimizing protein expression. Using turbo green fluorescent protein (tGFP) as a model, we tracked small molecule components in a Chinese Hamster Ovary (CHO) CFPS system to optimize protein production. Here, three bioreactors in continuous‐exchange cell‐free (CECF) format were characterized. A GFP optical sensor was built to monitor the product in real‐time. Mass transfer of important substrate and by‐product components such as nucleoside triphosphates (NTPs), creatine, and inorganic phosphate (Pi) across a 10‐kDa MWCO cellulose membrane was calculated. The highest efficiency measured by tGFP yields were found in a microdialysis device configuration; while a negative effect on yield was observed due to limited mass transfer of NTPs in a dialysis cup configuration. In 24‐well plate high‐throughput CECF format, addition of up to 40 mM creatine phosphate in the system increased yields by up to ∼60% relative to controls. Direct ATP addition, as opposed to creatine phosphate addition, negatively affected the expression. Pi addition of up to 30 mM to the expression significantly reduced yields by over ∼40% relative to controls. Overall, data presented in this report serves as a valuable reference to optimize the CHO CFPS system for next‐generation bioprocessing. Biotechnol. Bioeng. 2017;114: 1478–1486. © 2017 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. By tracking the concentration of small molecule components such as nucleoside triphosphates, creatine, and inorganic phosphate in a CHO‐based cell‐free protein expression system, efficiency of mass transfer across a regenerated cellulose membrane in various off‐the‐shelf bioreactor devices was calculated. Results were directly correlated to yield, which provides a critical reference in the development of efficient strategies in bioreactor design to support the demonstrated potential of CHO‐based platforms for next‐generation bioprocessing.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</pub><pmid>28266026</pmid><doi>10.1002/bit.26282</doi><tpages>9</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6140-7582</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0006-3592
ispartof Biotechnology and bioengineering, 2017-07, Vol.114 (7), p.1478-1486
issn 0006-3592
1097-0290
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1875142253
source MEDLINE; Wiley Journals
subjects Animals
Bioengineering
Bioprocessing
Bioreactors
Biotechnology
Cell-Free System - metabolism
Cellulose
cell‐free protein synthesis
Chemical synthesis
Chinese hamster ovary cells
CHO Cells - chemistry
CHO Cells - metabolism
Computing time
continuous‐exchange cell‐free
Creatine
Cricetulus
Design optimization
Dialysis
Fluorescence
Format
Green fluorescent protein
in vitro protein expression
Mass transfer
Microdialysis
Nucleoside triphosphates
Phosphates
Phosphocreatine
Protein biosynthesis
Protein Biosynthesis - physiology
Protein Engineering - instrumentation
Protein Engineering - methods
Protein expression
Protein synthesis
Quality Control
Yield
title Optimizing cell‐free protein expression in CHO: Assessing small molecule mass transfer effects in various reactor configurations
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-03T01%3A10%3A23IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Optimizing%20cell%E2%80%90free%20protein%20expression%20in%20CHO:%20Assessing%20small%20molecule%20mass%20transfer%20effects%20in%20various%20reactor%20configurations&rft.jtitle=Biotechnology%20and%20bioengineering&rft.au=Pe%C3%B1alber%E2%80%90Johnstone,%20Chariz&rft.date=2017-07&rft.volume=114&rft.issue=7&rft.spage=1478&rft.epage=1486&rft.pages=1478-1486&rft.issn=0006-3592&rft.eissn=1097-0290&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002/bit.26282&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1875142253%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1902139650&rft_id=info:pmid/28266026&rfr_iscdi=true