Sphagnum palustre clone vs native Pseudoscleropodium purum: A first trial in the field to validate the future of the moss bag technique

Although a large body of literature exists on the use of transplanted mosses for biomonitoring of air pollution, no article has addressed so far the use and the accumulation performance of a cloned moss for this purpose. In this work, a direct comparison of metal accumulation between bags filled wit...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Environmental pollution (1987) 2017-06, Vol.225, p.323-328
Hauptverfasser: Capozzi, F., Adamo, P., Di Palma, A., Aboal, J.R., Bargagli, R., Fernandez, J.A., Lopez Mahia, P., Reski, R., Tretiach, M., Spagnuolo, V., Giordano, S.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 328
container_issue
container_start_page 323
container_title Environmental pollution (1987)
container_volume 225
creator Capozzi, F.
Adamo, P.
Di Palma, A.
Aboal, J.R.
Bargagli, R.
Fernandez, J.A.
Lopez Mahia, P.
Reski, R.
Tretiach, M.
Spagnuolo, V.
Giordano, S.
description Although a large body of literature exists on the use of transplanted mosses for biomonitoring of air pollution, no article has addressed so far the use and the accumulation performance of a cloned moss for this purpose. In this work, a direct comparison of metal accumulation between bags filled with a Sphagnum palustre L. clone or with native Pseudoscleropodium purum Hedw., one of the most used moss species in biomonitoring surveys, was investigated. The test was performed in sites with different atmospheric contamination levels selected in urban, industrial, agricultural and background areas of Italy and Spain. Among the eighteen elements investigated, S. palustre was significantly enriched in 10 elements (Al, Ba, Cr, Cu, Fe, Hg, Pb, Sr, V and Zn), while P. purum was enriched only in 6 elements (Al, Ba, Cu, Hg, Pb and Sr), and had a consistently lower uptake capacity than S. palustre. The clone proved to be more sensitive in terms of metal uptake and showed a better performance as a bioaccumulator, providing a higher accumulation signal and allowing a finer distinction among the different land uses and levels of pollution. The excellent uptake performance of the S. palustre clone compared to the native P. purum and its low and stable baseline elemental content, evidenced in this work, are key features for the improvement of the moss bag approach and its large scale application. [Display omitted] •Metal accumulation was compared between a S. palustre clone and native P. purum.•The S. palustre clone proved to be more sensitive in terms of metal uptake.•The S. palustre clone showed a higher accumulation signal compared to P. purum.•S. palustre allowed a finer distinction among the different levels of pollution.•The higher sensitivity of the clone facilitates its use in low impacted environments. S. palustre clone shows better uptake ability in terms of accumulation signal and distinction among pollution levels compared to P. purum.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.envpol.2017.02.057
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1874784988</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0269749116324800</els_id><sourcerecordid>1874784988</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c362t-1135f901a06089f01e9592f4514c488ca8867bf607cb93275af015977dcd22173</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kc9u1DAQxi1ERbeFN0DIRy4JtuPEDgekqgKKVKlILWfL60y6Xjlx8J9IPEFfGy8pHDmNZvSb-WbmQ-gtJTUltPtwrGFeF-9qRqioCatJK16gHZWiqTrO-Eu0I6zrK8F7eo4uYjwSQnjTNK_QOZOsY43odujpfjnoxzlPeNEuxxQAG-dnwGvEs052Bfw9Qh58NA6CX_xgT2wOefqIr_BoQ0w4BasdtjNOByglcANOHq_a2UEn2Ko55TLbj3-yyceI9_oRJzCH2f7M8BqdjdpFePMcL9GPL58frm-q27uv366vbivTdCxVlDbt2BOqSUdkPxIKfduzkbeUGy6l0VJ2Yj92RJh93zDR6sK0vRCDGRijorlE77e5S_BFNiY12WjAOT2Dz1GV93EheS9lQfmGmlDWDTCqJdhJh1-KEnWyQB3VZoE6WaAIU8WC0vbuWSHvJxj-Nf39eQE-bQCUO1cLQUVjYTYw2AAmqcHb_yv8BpnJmtU</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1874784988</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Sphagnum palustre clone vs native Pseudoscleropodium purum: A first trial in the field to validate the future of the moss bag technique</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Access via ScienceDirect (Elsevier)</source><creator>Capozzi, F. ; Adamo, P. ; Di Palma, A. ; Aboal, J.R. ; Bargagli, R. ; Fernandez, J.A. ; Lopez Mahia, P. ; Reski, R. ; Tretiach, M. ; Spagnuolo, V. ; Giordano, S.</creator><creatorcontrib>Capozzi, F. ; Adamo, P. ; Di Palma, A. ; Aboal, J.R. ; Bargagli, R. ; Fernandez, J.A. ; Lopez Mahia, P. ; Reski, R. ; Tretiach, M. ; Spagnuolo, V. ; Giordano, S.</creatorcontrib><description>Although a large body of literature exists on the use of transplanted mosses for biomonitoring of air pollution, no article has addressed so far the use and the accumulation performance of a cloned moss for this purpose. In this work, a direct comparison of metal accumulation between bags filled with a Sphagnum palustre L. clone or with native Pseudoscleropodium purum Hedw., one of the most used moss species in biomonitoring surveys, was investigated. The test was performed in sites with different atmospheric contamination levels selected in urban, industrial, agricultural and background areas of Italy and Spain. Among the eighteen elements investigated, S. palustre was significantly enriched in 10 elements (Al, Ba, Cr, Cu, Fe, Hg, Pb, Sr, V and Zn), while P. purum was enriched only in 6 elements (Al, Ba, Cu, Hg, Pb and Sr), and had a consistently lower uptake capacity than S. palustre. The clone proved to be more sensitive in terms of metal uptake and showed a better performance as a bioaccumulator, providing a higher accumulation signal and allowing a finer distinction among the different land uses and levels of pollution. The excellent uptake performance of the S. palustre clone compared to the native P. purum and its low and stable baseline elemental content, evidenced in this work, are key features for the improvement of the moss bag approach and its large scale application. [Display omitted] •Metal accumulation was compared between a S. palustre clone and native P. purum.•The S. palustre clone proved to be more sensitive in terms of metal uptake.•The S. palustre clone showed a higher accumulation signal compared to P. purum.•S. palustre allowed a finer distinction among the different levels of pollution.•The higher sensitivity of the clone facilitates its use in low impacted environments. S. palustre clone shows better uptake ability in terms of accumulation signal and distinction among pollution levels compared to P. purum.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0269-7491</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1873-6424</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.envpol.2017.02.057</identifier><identifier>PMID: 28262376</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>Active biomonitoring ; Air Pollutants - analysis ; Air Pollution - statistics &amp; numerical data ; Air quality ; Bryophyta ; Bryopsida - chemistry ; Bryopsida - physiology ; Environmental Monitoring - methods ; Italy ; Mercury ; Metals - analysis ; Metals and metalloids ; MOSSclone ; Mossphere ; Spain ; Sphagnopsida - chemistry ; Sphagnopsida - physiology</subject><ispartof>Environmental pollution (1987), 2017-06, Vol.225, p.323-328</ispartof><rights>2017 Elsevier Ltd</rights><rights>Copyright © 2017 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c362t-1135f901a06089f01e9592f4514c488ca8867bf607cb93275af015977dcd22173</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c362t-1135f901a06089f01e9592f4514c488ca8867bf607cb93275af015977dcd22173</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-5021-6817 ; 0000-0002-7629-6106 ; 0000-0001-8310-2907</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2017.02.057$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>315,782,786,3554,27933,27934,46004</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28262376$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Capozzi, F.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Adamo, P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Di Palma, A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Aboal, J.R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bargagli, R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fernandez, J.A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lopez Mahia, P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Reski, R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tretiach, M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Spagnuolo, V.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Giordano, S.</creatorcontrib><title>Sphagnum palustre clone vs native Pseudoscleropodium purum: A first trial in the field to validate the future of the moss bag technique</title><title>Environmental pollution (1987)</title><addtitle>Environ Pollut</addtitle><description>Although a large body of literature exists on the use of transplanted mosses for biomonitoring of air pollution, no article has addressed so far the use and the accumulation performance of a cloned moss for this purpose. In this work, a direct comparison of metal accumulation between bags filled with a Sphagnum palustre L. clone or with native Pseudoscleropodium purum Hedw., one of the most used moss species in biomonitoring surveys, was investigated. The test was performed in sites with different atmospheric contamination levels selected in urban, industrial, agricultural and background areas of Italy and Spain. Among the eighteen elements investigated, S. palustre was significantly enriched in 10 elements (Al, Ba, Cr, Cu, Fe, Hg, Pb, Sr, V and Zn), while P. purum was enriched only in 6 elements (Al, Ba, Cu, Hg, Pb and Sr), and had a consistently lower uptake capacity than S. palustre. The clone proved to be more sensitive in terms of metal uptake and showed a better performance as a bioaccumulator, providing a higher accumulation signal and allowing a finer distinction among the different land uses and levels of pollution. The excellent uptake performance of the S. palustre clone compared to the native P. purum and its low and stable baseline elemental content, evidenced in this work, are key features for the improvement of the moss bag approach and its large scale application. [Display omitted] •Metal accumulation was compared between a S. palustre clone and native P. purum.•The S. palustre clone proved to be more sensitive in terms of metal uptake.•The S. palustre clone showed a higher accumulation signal compared to P. purum.•S. palustre allowed a finer distinction among the different levels of pollution.•The higher sensitivity of the clone facilitates its use in low impacted environments. S. palustre clone shows better uptake ability in terms of accumulation signal and distinction among pollution levels compared to P. purum.</description><subject>Active biomonitoring</subject><subject>Air Pollutants - analysis</subject><subject>Air Pollution - statistics &amp; numerical data</subject><subject>Air quality</subject><subject>Bryophyta</subject><subject>Bryopsida - chemistry</subject><subject>Bryopsida - physiology</subject><subject>Environmental Monitoring - methods</subject><subject>Italy</subject><subject>Mercury</subject><subject>Metals - analysis</subject><subject>Metals and metalloids</subject><subject>MOSSclone</subject><subject>Mossphere</subject><subject>Spain</subject><subject>Sphagnopsida - chemistry</subject><subject>Sphagnopsida - physiology</subject><issn>0269-7491</issn><issn>1873-6424</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2017</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kc9u1DAQxi1ERbeFN0DIRy4JtuPEDgekqgKKVKlILWfL60y6Xjlx8J9IPEFfGy8pHDmNZvSb-WbmQ-gtJTUltPtwrGFeF-9qRqioCatJK16gHZWiqTrO-Eu0I6zrK8F7eo4uYjwSQnjTNK_QOZOsY43odujpfjnoxzlPeNEuxxQAG-dnwGvEs052Bfw9Qh58NA6CX_xgT2wOefqIr_BoQ0w4BasdtjNOByglcANOHq_a2UEn2Ko55TLbj3-yyceI9_oRJzCH2f7M8BqdjdpFePMcL9GPL58frm-q27uv366vbivTdCxVlDbt2BOqSUdkPxIKfduzkbeUGy6l0VJ2Yj92RJh93zDR6sK0vRCDGRijorlE77e5S_BFNiY12WjAOT2Dz1GV93EheS9lQfmGmlDWDTCqJdhJh1-KEnWyQB3VZoE6WaAIU8WC0vbuWSHvJxj-Nf39eQE-bQCUO1cLQUVjYTYw2AAmqcHb_yv8BpnJmtU</recordid><startdate>20170601</startdate><enddate>20170601</enddate><creator>Capozzi, F.</creator><creator>Adamo, P.</creator><creator>Di Palma, A.</creator><creator>Aboal, J.R.</creator><creator>Bargagli, R.</creator><creator>Fernandez, J.A.</creator><creator>Lopez Mahia, P.</creator><creator>Reski, R.</creator><creator>Tretiach, M.</creator><creator>Spagnuolo, V.</creator><creator>Giordano, S.</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5021-6817</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7629-6106</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8310-2907</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20170601</creationdate><title>Sphagnum palustre clone vs native Pseudoscleropodium purum: A first trial in the field to validate the future of the moss bag technique</title><author>Capozzi, F. ; Adamo, P. ; Di Palma, A. ; Aboal, J.R. ; Bargagli, R. ; Fernandez, J.A. ; Lopez Mahia, P. ; Reski, R. ; Tretiach, M. ; Spagnuolo, V. ; Giordano, S.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c362t-1135f901a06089f01e9592f4514c488ca8867bf607cb93275af015977dcd22173</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2017</creationdate><topic>Active biomonitoring</topic><topic>Air Pollutants - analysis</topic><topic>Air Pollution - statistics &amp; numerical data</topic><topic>Air quality</topic><topic>Bryophyta</topic><topic>Bryopsida - chemistry</topic><topic>Bryopsida - physiology</topic><topic>Environmental Monitoring - methods</topic><topic>Italy</topic><topic>Mercury</topic><topic>Metals - analysis</topic><topic>Metals and metalloids</topic><topic>MOSSclone</topic><topic>Mossphere</topic><topic>Spain</topic><topic>Sphagnopsida - chemistry</topic><topic>Sphagnopsida - physiology</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Capozzi, F.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Adamo, P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Di Palma, A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Aboal, J.R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bargagli, R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fernandez, J.A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lopez Mahia, P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Reski, R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tretiach, M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Spagnuolo, V.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Giordano, S.</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Environmental pollution (1987)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Capozzi, F.</au><au>Adamo, P.</au><au>Di Palma, A.</au><au>Aboal, J.R.</au><au>Bargagli, R.</au><au>Fernandez, J.A.</au><au>Lopez Mahia, P.</au><au>Reski, R.</au><au>Tretiach, M.</au><au>Spagnuolo, V.</au><au>Giordano, S.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Sphagnum palustre clone vs native Pseudoscleropodium purum: A first trial in the field to validate the future of the moss bag technique</atitle><jtitle>Environmental pollution (1987)</jtitle><addtitle>Environ Pollut</addtitle><date>2017-06-01</date><risdate>2017</risdate><volume>225</volume><spage>323</spage><epage>328</epage><pages>323-328</pages><issn>0269-7491</issn><eissn>1873-6424</eissn><abstract>Although a large body of literature exists on the use of transplanted mosses for biomonitoring of air pollution, no article has addressed so far the use and the accumulation performance of a cloned moss for this purpose. In this work, a direct comparison of metal accumulation between bags filled with a Sphagnum palustre L. clone or with native Pseudoscleropodium purum Hedw., one of the most used moss species in biomonitoring surveys, was investigated. The test was performed in sites with different atmospheric contamination levels selected in urban, industrial, agricultural and background areas of Italy and Spain. Among the eighteen elements investigated, S. palustre was significantly enriched in 10 elements (Al, Ba, Cr, Cu, Fe, Hg, Pb, Sr, V and Zn), while P. purum was enriched only in 6 elements (Al, Ba, Cu, Hg, Pb and Sr), and had a consistently lower uptake capacity than S. palustre. The clone proved to be more sensitive in terms of metal uptake and showed a better performance as a bioaccumulator, providing a higher accumulation signal and allowing a finer distinction among the different land uses and levels of pollution. The excellent uptake performance of the S. palustre clone compared to the native P. purum and its low and stable baseline elemental content, evidenced in this work, are key features for the improvement of the moss bag approach and its large scale application. [Display omitted] •Metal accumulation was compared between a S. palustre clone and native P. purum.•The S. palustre clone proved to be more sensitive in terms of metal uptake.•The S. palustre clone showed a higher accumulation signal compared to P. purum.•S. palustre allowed a finer distinction among the different levels of pollution.•The higher sensitivity of the clone facilitates its use in low impacted environments. S. palustre clone shows better uptake ability in terms of accumulation signal and distinction among pollution levels compared to P. purum.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><pmid>28262376</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.envpol.2017.02.057</doi><tpages>6</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5021-6817</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7629-6106</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8310-2907</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0269-7491
ispartof Environmental pollution (1987), 2017-06, Vol.225, p.323-328
issn 0269-7491
1873-6424
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1874784988
source MEDLINE; Access via ScienceDirect (Elsevier)
subjects Active biomonitoring
Air Pollutants - analysis
Air Pollution - statistics & numerical data
Air quality
Bryophyta
Bryopsida - chemistry
Bryopsida - physiology
Environmental Monitoring - methods
Italy
Mercury
Metals - analysis
Metals and metalloids
MOSSclone
Mossphere
Spain
Sphagnopsida - chemistry
Sphagnopsida - physiology
title Sphagnum palustre clone vs native Pseudoscleropodium purum: A first trial in the field to validate the future of the moss bag technique
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-02T01%3A51%3A07IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Sphagnum%20palustre%20clone%20vs%20native%20Pseudoscleropodium%20purum:%20A%20first%20trial%20in%20the%20field%20to%20validate%20the%20future%20of%20the%20moss%20bag%20technique&rft.jtitle=Environmental%20pollution%20(1987)&rft.au=Capozzi,%20F.&rft.date=2017-06-01&rft.volume=225&rft.spage=323&rft.epage=328&rft.pages=323-328&rft.issn=0269-7491&rft.eissn=1873-6424&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.envpol.2017.02.057&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1874784988%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1874784988&rft_id=info:pmid/28262376&rft_els_id=S0269749116324800&rfr_iscdi=true