Are Instrumented Knee Forces Representative of a Larger Population of Cruciate-Retaining Total Knee Arthroplasties?

It is not known if the loads and motions reported for instrumented knees are generalizable to a larger population of total knee arthroplasty (TKA) patients. The purpose of this study is to (1) report axial implant force data for chair and stair activities for a population of cruciate-retaining TKA p...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:The Journal of arthroplasty 2017-07, Vol.32 (7), p.2268-2273
Hauptverfasser: Freed, Ryan D., Simon, Jacqueline C., Knowlton, Christopher B., Orozco Villaseñor, Diego A., Wimmer, Markus A., Lundberg, Hannah J.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 2273
container_issue 7
container_start_page 2268
container_title The Journal of arthroplasty
container_volume 32
creator Freed, Ryan D.
Simon, Jacqueline C.
Knowlton, Christopher B.
Orozco Villaseñor, Diego A.
Wimmer, Markus A.
Lundberg, Hannah J.
description It is not known if the loads and motions reported for instrumented knees are generalizable to a larger population of total knee arthroplasty (TKA) patients. The purpose of this study is to (1) report axial implant force data for chair and stair activities for a population of cruciate-retaining TKA patients and (2) compare the population forces to those measured with instrumented TKAs. Twenty-three subjects with a cruciate-retaining TKA underwent motion analysis during stair ascending, stair descending, chair sitting, and chair rising activities after informed consent in this institutional review board approved study. Axial TKA forces were calculated using a previously validated computational model. Differences between the mean and variability of population instrumented TKA peak forces and force impulses were tested using t tests and Levene test. Peak axial forces were 3.06, 2.74, 2.65, and 2.60 kN for stair ascent, stair descent, chair rising, and chair sitting, respectively. Force impulses were 123.3, 123.4, 153.5, and 154.0 kN*% activity cycle for stair ascent, stair descent, chair sitting, and chair rising, respectively. Population TKA and instrumented TKA peak forces were different for stair ascent (P = .03) and stair descent (P = .03) in the second half of the activity cycles. The variability of the peak forces and impulses were not different (P = .106 to P = .99). The forces and motions presented in this study represent cruciate-retaining TKA patients and could be used for displacement-driven knee wear testing. The forces are similar to those in the literature from instrumented prostheses of an ultracongruent cruciate-sacrificing TKA.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.arth.2017.01.054
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1874784709</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0883540317300864</els_id><sourcerecordid>1874784709</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c400t-5e5733ddec24672578090a9d96fabd96db1b533f133c23eb9fd3ebf27dccd9e43</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kM2LFDEQxYMo7rj6D3iQHL10W_nqDxBkGFx3cUBZ1nNIJ9Vrhp5Om6QX9r83w6we91IFj_ceVT9C3jOoGbDm06E2Mf-uObC2BlaDki_IhinBq05C85JsoOtEpSSIC_ImpQMAY0rJ1-SCd7zhUqkNSduI9GZOOa5HnDM6-n1GpFchWkz0FpeIqegm-wekYaSG7k28x0h_hmWdihzmk7yLq_UmY3WL2fjZz_f0LmQzndu25cwYlsmk7DF9eUtejWZK-O5pX5JfV1_vdtfV_se3m912X1kJkCuFqhXCObRcNi1XbQc9mN71zWiGMt3ABiXEyISwXODQj67MkbfOWtejFJfk47l3ieHPiinro08Wp8nMGNakWdfKtpMt9MXKz1YbQ0oRR71EfzTxUTPQJ9j6oE-w9Qm2BqYL7BL68NS_Dkd0_yP_6BbD57MBy5cPHqNO1uNs0fmINmsX_HP9fwHaGJJQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1874784709</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Are Instrumented Knee Forces Representative of a Larger Population of Cruciate-Retaining Total Knee Arthroplasties?</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals</source><creator>Freed, Ryan D. ; Simon, Jacqueline C. ; Knowlton, Christopher B. ; Orozco Villaseñor, Diego A. ; Wimmer, Markus A. ; Lundberg, Hannah J.</creator><creatorcontrib>Freed, Ryan D. ; Simon, Jacqueline C. ; Knowlton, Christopher B. ; Orozco Villaseñor, Diego A. ; Wimmer, Markus A. ; Lundberg, Hannah J.</creatorcontrib><description>It is not known if the loads and motions reported for instrumented knees are generalizable to a larger population of total knee arthroplasty (TKA) patients. The purpose of this study is to (1) report axial implant force data for chair and stair activities for a population of cruciate-retaining TKA patients and (2) compare the population forces to those measured with instrumented TKAs. Twenty-three subjects with a cruciate-retaining TKA underwent motion analysis during stair ascending, stair descending, chair sitting, and chair rising activities after informed consent in this institutional review board approved study. Axial TKA forces were calculated using a previously validated computational model. Differences between the mean and variability of population instrumented TKA peak forces and force impulses were tested using t tests and Levene test. Peak axial forces were 3.06, 2.74, 2.65, and 2.60 kN for stair ascent, stair descent, chair rising, and chair sitting, respectively. Force impulses were 123.3, 123.4, 153.5, and 154.0 kN*% activity cycle for stair ascent, stair descent, chair sitting, and chair rising, respectively. Population TKA and instrumented TKA peak forces were different for stair ascent (P = .03) and stair descent (P = .03) in the second half of the activity cycles. The variability of the peak forces and impulses were not different (P = .106 to P = .99). The forces and motions presented in this study represent cruciate-retaining TKA patients and could be used for displacement-driven knee wear testing. The forces are similar to those in the literature from instrumented prostheses of an ultracongruent cruciate-sacrificing TKA.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0883-5403</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1532-8406</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.arth.2017.01.054</identifier><identifier>PMID: 28262455</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject>Aged ; Arthroplasty, Replacement, Knee ; axial force ; Biomechanical Phenomena ; Computer Simulation ; Humans ; instrumented knee ; Knee - surgery ; Knee Joint - physiology ; Knee Joint - surgery ; Knee Prosthesis ; Middle Aged ; musculoskeletal model ; Reference Values ; stair and chair activities ; Stair Climbing - physiology ; total knee arthroplasty ; Weight-Bearing</subject><ispartof>The Journal of arthroplasty, 2017-07, Vol.32 (7), p.2268-2273</ispartof><rights>2017 Elsevier Inc.</rights><rights>Copyright © 2017 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c400t-5e5733ddec24672578090a9d96fabd96db1b533f133c23eb9fd3ebf27dccd9e43</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c400t-5e5733ddec24672578090a9d96fabd96db1b533f133c23eb9fd3ebf27dccd9e43</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-6981-8690</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0883540317300864$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,3537,27901,27902,65306</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28262455$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Freed, Ryan D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Simon, Jacqueline C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Knowlton, Christopher B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Orozco Villaseñor, Diego A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wimmer, Markus A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lundberg, Hannah J.</creatorcontrib><title>Are Instrumented Knee Forces Representative of a Larger Population of Cruciate-Retaining Total Knee Arthroplasties?</title><title>The Journal of arthroplasty</title><addtitle>J Arthroplasty</addtitle><description>It is not known if the loads and motions reported for instrumented knees are generalizable to a larger population of total knee arthroplasty (TKA) patients. The purpose of this study is to (1) report axial implant force data for chair and stair activities for a population of cruciate-retaining TKA patients and (2) compare the population forces to those measured with instrumented TKAs. Twenty-three subjects with a cruciate-retaining TKA underwent motion analysis during stair ascending, stair descending, chair sitting, and chair rising activities after informed consent in this institutional review board approved study. Axial TKA forces were calculated using a previously validated computational model. Differences between the mean and variability of population instrumented TKA peak forces and force impulses were tested using t tests and Levene test. Peak axial forces were 3.06, 2.74, 2.65, and 2.60 kN for stair ascent, stair descent, chair rising, and chair sitting, respectively. Force impulses were 123.3, 123.4, 153.5, and 154.0 kN*% activity cycle for stair ascent, stair descent, chair sitting, and chair rising, respectively. Population TKA and instrumented TKA peak forces were different for stair ascent (P = .03) and stair descent (P = .03) in the second half of the activity cycles. The variability of the peak forces and impulses were not different (P = .106 to P = .99). The forces and motions presented in this study represent cruciate-retaining TKA patients and could be used for displacement-driven knee wear testing. The forces are similar to those in the literature from instrumented prostheses of an ultracongruent cruciate-sacrificing TKA.</description><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Arthroplasty, Replacement, Knee</subject><subject>axial force</subject><subject>Biomechanical Phenomena</subject><subject>Computer Simulation</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>instrumented knee</subject><subject>Knee - surgery</subject><subject>Knee Joint - physiology</subject><subject>Knee Joint - surgery</subject><subject>Knee Prosthesis</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>musculoskeletal model</subject><subject>Reference Values</subject><subject>stair and chair activities</subject><subject>Stair Climbing - physiology</subject><subject>total knee arthroplasty</subject><subject>Weight-Bearing</subject><issn>0883-5403</issn><issn>1532-8406</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2017</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kM2LFDEQxYMo7rj6D3iQHL10W_nqDxBkGFx3cUBZ1nNIJ9Vrhp5Om6QX9r83w6we91IFj_ceVT9C3jOoGbDm06E2Mf-uObC2BlaDki_IhinBq05C85JsoOtEpSSIC_ImpQMAY0rJ1-SCd7zhUqkNSduI9GZOOa5HnDM6-n1GpFchWkz0FpeIqegm-wekYaSG7k28x0h_hmWdihzmk7yLq_UmY3WL2fjZz_f0LmQzndu25cwYlsmk7DF9eUtejWZK-O5pX5JfV1_vdtfV_se3m912X1kJkCuFqhXCObRcNi1XbQc9mN71zWiGMt3ABiXEyISwXODQj67MkbfOWtejFJfk47l3ieHPiinro08Wp8nMGNakWdfKtpMt9MXKz1YbQ0oRR71EfzTxUTPQJ9j6oE-w9Qm2BqYL7BL68NS_Dkd0_yP_6BbD57MBy5cPHqNO1uNs0fmINmsX_HP9fwHaGJJQ</recordid><startdate>201707</startdate><enddate>201707</enddate><creator>Freed, Ryan D.</creator><creator>Simon, Jacqueline C.</creator><creator>Knowlton, Christopher B.</creator><creator>Orozco Villaseñor, Diego A.</creator><creator>Wimmer, Markus A.</creator><creator>Lundberg, Hannah J.</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6981-8690</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>201707</creationdate><title>Are Instrumented Knee Forces Representative of a Larger Population of Cruciate-Retaining Total Knee Arthroplasties?</title><author>Freed, Ryan D. ; Simon, Jacqueline C. ; Knowlton, Christopher B. ; Orozco Villaseñor, Diego A. ; Wimmer, Markus A. ; Lundberg, Hannah J.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c400t-5e5733ddec24672578090a9d96fabd96db1b533f133c23eb9fd3ebf27dccd9e43</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2017</creationdate><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Arthroplasty, Replacement, Knee</topic><topic>axial force</topic><topic>Biomechanical Phenomena</topic><topic>Computer Simulation</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>instrumented knee</topic><topic>Knee - surgery</topic><topic>Knee Joint - physiology</topic><topic>Knee Joint - surgery</topic><topic>Knee Prosthesis</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>musculoskeletal model</topic><topic>Reference Values</topic><topic>stair and chair activities</topic><topic>Stair Climbing - physiology</topic><topic>total knee arthroplasty</topic><topic>Weight-Bearing</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Freed, Ryan D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Simon, Jacqueline C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Knowlton, Christopher B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Orozco Villaseñor, Diego A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wimmer, Markus A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lundberg, Hannah J.</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>The Journal of arthroplasty</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Freed, Ryan D.</au><au>Simon, Jacqueline C.</au><au>Knowlton, Christopher B.</au><au>Orozco Villaseñor, Diego A.</au><au>Wimmer, Markus A.</au><au>Lundberg, Hannah J.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Are Instrumented Knee Forces Representative of a Larger Population of Cruciate-Retaining Total Knee Arthroplasties?</atitle><jtitle>The Journal of arthroplasty</jtitle><addtitle>J Arthroplasty</addtitle><date>2017-07</date><risdate>2017</risdate><volume>32</volume><issue>7</issue><spage>2268</spage><epage>2273</epage><pages>2268-2273</pages><issn>0883-5403</issn><eissn>1532-8406</eissn><abstract>It is not known if the loads and motions reported for instrumented knees are generalizable to a larger population of total knee arthroplasty (TKA) patients. The purpose of this study is to (1) report axial implant force data for chair and stair activities for a population of cruciate-retaining TKA patients and (2) compare the population forces to those measured with instrumented TKAs. Twenty-three subjects with a cruciate-retaining TKA underwent motion analysis during stair ascending, stair descending, chair sitting, and chair rising activities after informed consent in this institutional review board approved study. Axial TKA forces were calculated using a previously validated computational model. Differences between the mean and variability of population instrumented TKA peak forces and force impulses were tested using t tests and Levene test. Peak axial forces were 3.06, 2.74, 2.65, and 2.60 kN for stair ascent, stair descent, chair rising, and chair sitting, respectively. Force impulses were 123.3, 123.4, 153.5, and 154.0 kN*% activity cycle for stair ascent, stair descent, chair sitting, and chair rising, respectively. Population TKA and instrumented TKA peak forces were different for stair ascent (P = .03) and stair descent (P = .03) in the second half of the activity cycles. The variability of the peak forces and impulses were not different (P = .106 to P = .99). The forces and motions presented in this study represent cruciate-retaining TKA patients and could be used for displacement-driven knee wear testing. The forces are similar to those in the literature from instrumented prostheses of an ultracongruent cruciate-sacrificing TKA.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><pmid>28262455</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.arth.2017.01.054</doi><tpages>6</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6981-8690</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0883-5403
ispartof The Journal of arthroplasty, 2017-07, Vol.32 (7), p.2268-2273
issn 0883-5403
1532-8406
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1874784709
source MEDLINE; Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals
subjects Aged
Arthroplasty, Replacement, Knee
axial force
Biomechanical Phenomena
Computer Simulation
Humans
instrumented knee
Knee - surgery
Knee Joint - physiology
Knee Joint - surgery
Knee Prosthesis
Middle Aged
musculoskeletal model
Reference Values
stair and chair activities
Stair Climbing - physiology
total knee arthroplasty
Weight-Bearing
title Are Instrumented Knee Forces Representative of a Larger Population of Cruciate-Retaining Total Knee Arthroplasties?
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-02T10%3A38%3A08IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Are%20Instrumented%20Knee%20Forces%20Representative%20of%20a%20Larger%20Population%20of%20Cruciate-Retaining%20Total%20Knee%20Arthroplasties?&rft.jtitle=The%20Journal%20of%20arthroplasty&rft.au=Freed,%20Ryan%20D.&rft.date=2017-07&rft.volume=32&rft.issue=7&rft.spage=2268&rft.epage=2273&rft.pages=2268-2273&rft.issn=0883-5403&rft.eissn=1532-8406&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.arth.2017.01.054&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1874784709%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1874784709&rft_id=info:pmid/28262455&rft_els_id=S0883540317300864&rfr_iscdi=true