Are Instrumented Knee Forces Representative of a Larger Population of Cruciate-Retaining Total Knee Arthroplasties?
It is not known if the loads and motions reported for instrumented knees are generalizable to a larger population of total knee arthroplasty (TKA) patients. The purpose of this study is to (1) report axial implant force data for chair and stair activities for a population of cruciate-retaining TKA p...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | The Journal of arthroplasty 2017-07, Vol.32 (7), p.2268-2273 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 2273 |
---|---|
container_issue | 7 |
container_start_page | 2268 |
container_title | The Journal of arthroplasty |
container_volume | 32 |
creator | Freed, Ryan D. Simon, Jacqueline C. Knowlton, Christopher B. Orozco Villaseñor, Diego A. Wimmer, Markus A. Lundberg, Hannah J. |
description | It is not known if the loads and motions reported for instrumented knees are generalizable to a larger population of total knee arthroplasty (TKA) patients. The purpose of this study is to (1) report axial implant force data for chair and stair activities for a population of cruciate-retaining TKA patients and (2) compare the population forces to those measured with instrumented TKAs.
Twenty-three subjects with a cruciate-retaining TKA underwent motion analysis during stair ascending, stair descending, chair sitting, and chair rising activities after informed consent in this institutional review board approved study. Axial TKA forces were calculated using a previously validated computational model. Differences between the mean and variability of population instrumented TKA peak forces and force impulses were tested using t tests and Levene test.
Peak axial forces were 3.06, 2.74, 2.65, and 2.60 kN for stair ascent, stair descent, chair rising, and chair sitting, respectively. Force impulses were 123.3, 123.4, 153.5, and 154.0 kN*% activity cycle for stair ascent, stair descent, chair sitting, and chair rising, respectively. Population TKA and instrumented TKA peak forces were different for stair ascent (P = .03) and stair descent (P = .03) in the second half of the activity cycles. The variability of the peak forces and impulses were not different (P = .106 to P = .99).
The forces and motions presented in this study represent cruciate-retaining TKA patients and could be used for displacement-driven knee wear testing. The forces are similar to those in the literature from instrumented prostheses of an ultracongruent cruciate-sacrificing TKA. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.arth.2017.01.054 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1874784709</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0883540317300864</els_id><sourcerecordid>1874784709</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c400t-5e5733ddec24672578090a9d96fabd96db1b533f133c23eb9fd3ebf27dccd9e43</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kM2LFDEQxYMo7rj6D3iQHL10W_nqDxBkGFx3cUBZ1nNIJ9Vrhp5Om6QX9r83w6we91IFj_ceVT9C3jOoGbDm06E2Mf-uObC2BlaDki_IhinBq05C85JsoOtEpSSIC_ImpQMAY0rJ1-SCd7zhUqkNSduI9GZOOa5HnDM6-n1GpFchWkz0FpeIqegm-wekYaSG7k28x0h_hmWdihzmk7yLq_UmY3WL2fjZz_f0LmQzndu25cwYlsmk7DF9eUtejWZK-O5pX5JfV1_vdtfV_se3m912X1kJkCuFqhXCObRcNi1XbQc9mN71zWiGMt3ABiXEyISwXODQj67MkbfOWtejFJfk47l3ieHPiinro08Wp8nMGNakWdfKtpMt9MXKz1YbQ0oRR71EfzTxUTPQJ9j6oE-w9Qm2BqYL7BL68NS_Dkd0_yP_6BbD57MBy5cPHqNO1uNs0fmINmsX_HP9fwHaGJJQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1874784709</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Are Instrumented Knee Forces Representative of a Larger Population of Cruciate-Retaining Total Knee Arthroplasties?</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals</source><creator>Freed, Ryan D. ; Simon, Jacqueline C. ; Knowlton, Christopher B. ; Orozco Villaseñor, Diego A. ; Wimmer, Markus A. ; Lundberg, Hannah J.</creator><creatorcontrib>Freed, Ryan D. ; Simon, Jacqueline C. ; Knowlton, Christopher B. ; Orozco Villaseñor, Diego A. ; Wimmer, Markus A. ; Lundberg, Hannah J.</creatorcontrib><description>It is not known if the loads and motions reported for instrumented knees are generalizable to a larger population of total knee arthroplasty (TKA) patients. The purpose of this study is to (1) report axial implant force data for chair and stair activities for a population of cruciate-retaining TKA patients and (2) compare the population forces to those measured with instrumented TKAs.
Twenty-three subjects with a cruciate-retaining TKA underwent motion analysis during stair ascending, stair descending, chair sitting, and chair rising activities after informed consent in this institutional review board approved study. Axial TKA forces were calculated using a previously validated computational model. Differences between the mean and variability of population instrumented TKA peak forces and force impulses were tested using t tests and Levene test.
Peak axial forces were 3.06, 2.74, 2.65, and 2.60 kN for stair ascent, stair descent, chair rising, and chair sitting, respectively. Force impulses were 123.3, 123.4, 153.5, and 154.0 kN*% activity cycle for stair ascent, stair descent, chair sitting, and chair rising, respectively. Population TKA and instrumented TKA peak forces were different for stair ascent (P = .03) and stair descent (P = .03) in the second half of the activity cycles. The variability of the peak forces and impulses were not different (P = .106 to P = .99).
The forces and motions presented in this study represent cruciate-retaining TKA patients and could be used for displacement-driven knee wear testing. The forces are similar to those in the literature from instrumented prostheses of an ultracongruent cruciate-sacrificing TKA.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0883-5403</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1532-8406</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.arth.2017.01.054</identifier><identifier>PMID: 28262455</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject>Aged ; Arthroplasty, Replacement, Knee ; axial force ; Biomechanical Phenomena ; Computer Simulation ; Humans ; instrumented knee ; Knee - surgery ; Knee Joint - physiology ; Knee Joint - surgery ; Knee Prosthesis ; Middle Aged ; musculoskeletal model ; Reference Values ; stair and chair activities ; Stair Climbing - physiology ; total knee arthroplasty ; Weight-Bearing</subject><ispartof>The Journal of arthroplasty, 2017-07, Vol.32 (7), p.2268-2273</ispartof><rights>2017 Elsevier Inc.</rights><rights>Copyright © 2017 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c400t-5e5733ddec24672578090a9d96fabd96db1b533f133c23eb9fd3ebf27dccd9e43</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c400t-5e5733ddec24672578090a9d96fabd96db1b533f133c23eb9fd3ebf27dccd9e43</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-6981-8690</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0883540317300864$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,3537,27901,27902,65306</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28262455$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Freed, Ryan D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Simon, Jacqueline C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Knowlton, Christopher B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Orozco Villaseñor, Diego A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wimmer, Markus A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lundberg, Hannah J.</creatorcontrib><title>Are Instrumented Knee Forces Representative of a Larger Population of Cruciate-Retaining Total Knee Arthroplasties?</title><title>The Journal of arthroplasty</title><addtitle>J Arthroplasty</addtitle><description>It is not known if the loads and motions reported for instrumented knees are generalizable to a larger population of total knee arthroplasty (TKA) patients. The purpose of this study is to (1) report axial implant force data for chair and stair activities for a population of cruciate-retaining TKA patients and (2) compare the population forces to those measured with instrumented TKAs.
Twenty-three subjects with a cruciate-retaining TKA underwent motion analysis during stair ascending, stair descending, chair sitting, and chair rising activities after informed consent in this institutional review board approved study. Axial TKA forces were calculated using a previously validated computational model. Differences between the mean and variability of population instrumented TKA peak forces and force impulses were tested using t tests and Levene test.
Peak axial forces were 3.06, 2.74, 2.65, and 2.60 kN for stair ascent, stair descent, chair rising, and chair sitting, respectively. Force impulses were 123.3, 123.4, 153.5, and 154.0 kN*% activity cycle for stair ascent, stair descent, chair sitting, and chair rising, respectively. Population TKA and instrumented TKA peak forces were different for stair ascent (P = .03) and stair descent (P = .03) in the second half of the activity cycles. The variability of the peak forces and impulses were not different (P = .106 to P = .99).
The forces and motions presented in this study represent cruciate-retaining TKA patients and could be used for displacement-driven knee wear testing. The forces are similar to those in the literature from instrumented prostheses of an ultracongruent cruciate-sacrificing TKA.</description><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Arthroplasty, Replacement, Knee</subject><subject>axial force</subject><subject>Biomechanical Phenomena</subject><subject>Computer Simulation</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>instrumented knee</subject><subject>Knee - surgery</subject><subject>Knee Joint - physiology</subject><subject>Knee Joint - surgery</subject><subject>Knee Prosthesis</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>musculoskeletal model</subject><subject>Reference Values</subject><subject>stair and chair activities</subject><subject>Stair Climbing - physiology</subject><subject>total knee arthroplasty</subject><subject>Weight-Bearing</subject><issn>0883-5403</issn><issn>1532-8406</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2017</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kM2LFDEQxYMo7rj6D3iQHL10W_nqDxBkGFx3cUBZ1nNIJ9Vrhp5Om6QX9r83w6we91IFj_ceVT9C3jOoGbDm06E2Mf-uObC2BlaDki_IhinBq05C85JsoOtEpSSIC_ImpQMAY0rJ1-SCd7zhUqkNSduI9GZOOa5HnDM6-n1GpFchWkz0FpeIqegm-wekYaSG7k28x0h_hmWdihzmk7yLq_UmY3WL2fjZz_f0LmQzndu25cwYlsmk7DF9eUtejWZK-O5pX5JfV1_vdtfV_se3m912X1kJkCuFqhXCObRcNi1XbQc9mN71zWiGMt3ABiXEyISwXODQj67MkbfOWtejFJfk47l3ieHPiinro08Wp8nMGNakWdfKtpMt9MXKz1YbQ0oRR71EfzTxUTPQJ9j6oE-w9Qm2BqYL7BL68NS_Dkd0_yP_6BbD57MBy5cPHqNO1uNs0fmINmsX_HP9fwHaGJJQ</recordid><startdate>201707</startdate><enddate>201707</enddate><creator>Freed, Ryan D.</creator><creator>Simon, Jacqueline C.</creator><creator>Knowlton, Christopher B.</creator><creator>Orozco Villaseñor, Diego A.</creator><creator>Wimmer, Markus A.</creator><creator>Lundberg, Hannah J.</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6981-8690</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>201707</creationdate><title>Are Instrumented Knee Forces Representative of a Larger Population of Cruciate-Retaining Total Knee Arthroplasties?</title><author>Freed, Ryan D. ; Simon, Jacqueline C. ; Knowlton, Christopher B. ; Orozco Villaseñor, Diego A. ; Wimmer, Markus A. ; Lundberg, Hannah J.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c400t-5e5733ddec24672578090a9d96fabd96db1b533f133c23eb9fd3ebf27dccd9e43</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2017</creationdate><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Arthroplasty, Replacement, Knee</topic><topic>axial force</topic><topic>Biomechanical Phenomena</topic><topic>Computer Simulation</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>instrumented knee</topic><topic>Knee - surgery</topic><topic>Knee Joint - physiology</topic><topic>Knee Joint - surgery</topic><topic>Knee Prosthesis</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>musculoskeletal model</topic><topic>Reference Values</topic><topic>stair and chair activities</topic><topic>Stair Climbing - physiology</topic><topic>total knee arthroplasty</topic><topic>Weight-Bearing</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Freed, Ryan D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Simon, Jacqueline C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Knowlton, Christopher B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Orozco Villaseñor, Diego A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wimmer, Markus A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lundberg, Hannah J.</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>The Journal of arthroplasty</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Freed, Ryan D.</au><au>Simon, Jacqueline C.</au><au>Knowlton, Christopher B.</au><au>Orozco Villaseñor, Diego A.</au><au>Wimmer, Markus A.</au><au>Lundberg, Hannah J.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Are Instrumented Knee Forces Representative of a Larger Population of Cruciate-Retaining Total Knee Arthroplasties?</atitle><jtitle>The Journal of arthroplasty</jtitle><addtitle>J Arthroplasty</addtitle><date>2017-07</date><risdate>2017</risdate><volume>32</volume><issue>7</issue><spage>2268</spage><epage>2273</epage><pages>2268-2273</pages><issn>0883-5403</issn><eissn>1532-8406</eissn><abstract>It is not known if the loads and motions reported for instrumented knees are generalizable to a larger population of total knee arthroplasty (TKA) patients. The purpose of this study is to (1) report axial implant force data for chair and stair activities for a population of cruciate-retaining TKA patients and (2) compare the population forces to those measured with instrumented TKAs.
Twenty-three subjects with a cruciate-retaining TKA underwent motion analysis during stair ascending, stair descending, chair sitting, and chair rising activities after informed consent in this institutional review board approved study. Axial TKA forces were calculated using a previously validated computational model. Differences between the mean and variability of population instrumented TKA peak forces and force impulses were tested using t tests and Levene test.
Peak axial forces were 3.06, 2.74, 2.65, and 2.60 kN for stair ascent, stair descent, chair rising, and chair sitting, respectively. Force impulses were 123.3, 123.4, 153.5, and 154.0 kN*% activity cycle for stair ascent, stair descent, chair sitting, and chair rising, respectively. Population TKA and instrumented TKA peak forces were different for stair ascent (P = .03) and stair descent (P = .03) in the second half of the activity cycles. The variability of the peak forces and impulses were not different (P = .106 to P = .99).
The forces and motions presented in this study represent cruciate-retaining TKA patients and could be used for displacement-driven knee wear testing. The forces are similar to those in the literature from instrumented prostheses of an ultracongruent cruciate-sacrificing TKA.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><pmid>28262455</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.arth.2017.01.054</doi><tpages>6</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6981-8690</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0883-5403 |
ispartof | The Journal of arthroplasty, 2017-07, Vol.32 (7), p.2268-2273 |
issn | 0883-5403 1532-8406 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1874784709 |
source | MEDLINE; Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals |
subjects | Aged Arthroplasty, Replacement, Knee axial force Biomechanical Phenomena Computer Simulation Humans instrumented knee Knee - surgery Knee Joint - physiology Knee Joint - surgery Knee Prosthesis Middle Aged musculoskeletal model Reference Values stair and chair activities Stair Climbing - physiology total knee arthroplasty Weight-Bearing |
title | Are Instrumented Knee Forces Representative of a Larger Population of Cruciate-Retaining Total Knee Arthroplasties? |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-02T10%3A38%3A08IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Are%20Instrumented%20Knee%20Forces%20Representative%20of%20a%20Larger%20Population%20of%20Cruciate-Retaining%20Total%20Knee%20Arthroplasties?&rft.jtitle=The%20Journal%20of%20arthroplasty&rft.au=Freed,%20Ryan%20D.&rft.date=2017-07&rft.volume=32&rft.issue=7&rft.spage=2268&rft.epage=2273&rft.pages=2268-2273&rft.issn=0883-5403&rft.eissn=1532-8406&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.arth.2017.01.054&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1874784709%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1874784709&rft_id=info:pmid/28262455&rft_els_id=S0883540317300864&rfr_iscdi=true |