Examination of the Validity of a Clinical Prediction Rule to Identify Patients With Shoulder Pain Likely to Benefit From Cervicothoracic Manipulation

Study Design Secondary analysis of a randomized controlled trial. Background Prognostic variables identifying patients with shoulder pain who are likely to respond to cervicothoracic manipulation have been reported; however, they have yet to be validated. Objective To examine the validity of previou...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:The journal of orthopaedic and sports physical therapy 2017-04, Vol.47 (4), p.252-260
Hauptverfasser: Mintken, Paul E, McDevitt, Amy W, Michener, Lori A, Boyles, Robert E, Beardslee, Amber R, Burns, Scott A, Haberl, Matthew D, Hinrichs, Lauren A, Cleland, Joshua A
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 260
container_issue 4
container_start_page 252
container_title The journal of orthopaedic and sports physical therapy
container_volume 47
creator Mintken, Paul E
McDevitt, Amy W
Michener, Lori A
Boyles, Robert E
Beardslee, Amber R
Burns, Scott A
Haberl, Matthew D
Hinrichs, Lauren A
Cleland, Joshua A
description Study Design Secondary analysis of a randomized controlled trial. Background Prognostic variables identifying patients with shoulder pain who are likely to respond to cervicothoracic manipulation have been reported; however, they have yet to be validated. Objective To examine the validity of previously reported prognostic variables in predicting which patients with shoulder pain will respond to cervicothoracic manipulation. Methods Participants (n = 140) with a report of shoulder pain were randomly assigned to receive either 2 sessions of range-of-motion exercises plus 6 sessions of stretching and strengthening exercises (exercise group), or 2 sessions of cervicothoracic manipulation and range-of-motion exercises followed by 6 sessions of stretching and strengthening exercise (manipulative-therapy-plus-exercise group). Outcomes of disability (Shoulder Pain and Disability Index, shortened version of the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand Questionnaire) and pain (numeric pain-rating scale) were collected at baseline, 1 week, 4 weeks, and 6 months. Time, treatment group, status of predictor variables, and 2-way and 3-way interactions were analyzed using linear mixed models with repeated measures. Results There were no significant 3-way interactions for either disability (P = .27) or pain scores (P = .70) for time, group, and predictor status for any of the predictor variables. Conclusion The results of the current study did not validate the previously identified prognostic variables; therefore, we cannot support using these in clinical practice. Further updating of the existing prediction rule may be warranted and could potentially result in new prognostic variables and improved generalizability. Limitations of the study were a mean duration of symptoms of greater than 2 years and a loss to follow-up of 19% at 6 months. Level of Evidence Prognosis, level 1b. Trial prospectively registered March 30, 2012 at www.clinicaltrials.gov (NCT01571674). J Orthop Sports Phys Ther 2017;47(4):252-260. Epub 3 Mar 2017. doi:10.2519/jospt.2017.7100.
doi_str_mv 10.2519/jospt.2017.7100
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1874448072</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1874448072</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c297t-f6b26c97cb0c44cabfab88c8dd5948ba2f5ad550ecbef190bbcbcbc1c6b2c1d63</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNo9kU1v1DAQhi0EokvhzA35yCVbO-t8HWHVQqVFVHweI3s81k5x4sV2KvaH8H9Jti3jw4yt531lzcvYaynWZSW7i9uQDnldCtmsGynEE7aS3aYt5Eapp2wlZCeKWkh5xl6kdCvmUkI9Z2dlW1ZNLZsV-3v5Rw806kxh5MHxvEf-Q3uylI_LXfOtp5FAe34T0RKcwC-TR54Dv7Y4ZnJHfjMbzGPiPynv-dd9mLzFOD_TyHf0C_1xwd_jiI4yv4ph4FuMdwQh70PUQMA_6ZEOkz_95CV75rRP-Oqhn7PvV5ffth-L3ecP19t3uwLKrsmFq01ZQ9eAEaAUaOO0aVtora061RpdukrbqhIIBt28C2NgORJmHUhbb87Z23vfQwy_J0y5HygBeq9HDFPqZdsopVrRlDN6cY9CDClFdP0h0qDjsZeiX7LoT1n0Sxb9ksWsePNgPpkB7X_-cfmbf0Htils</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1874448072</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Examination of the Validity of a Clinical Prediction Rule to Identify Patients With Shoulder Pain Likely to Benefit From Cervicothoracic Manipulation</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Journals@Ovid Complete</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><creator>Mintken, Paul E ; McDevitt, Amy W ; Michener, Lori A ; Boyles, Robert E ; Beardslee, Amber R ; Burns, Scott A ; Haberl, Matthew D ; Hinrichs, Lauren A ; Cleland, Joshua A</creator><creatorcontrib>Mintken, Paul E ; McDevitt, Amy W ; Michener, Lori A ; Boyles, Robert E ; Beardslee, Amber R ; Burns, Scott A ; Haberl, Matthew D ; Hinrichs, Lauren A ; Cleland, Joshua A</creatorcontrib><description>Study Design Secondary analysis of a randomized controlled trial. Background Prognostic variables identifying patients with shoulder pain who are likely to respond to cervicothoracic manipulation have been reported; however, they have yet to be validated. Objective To examine the validity of previously reported prognostic variables in predicting which patients with shoulder pain will respond to cervicothoracic manipulation. Methods Participants (n = 140) with a report of shoulder pain were randomly assigned to receive either 2 sessions of range-of-motion exercises plus 6 sessions of stretching and strengthening exercises (exercise group), or 2 sessions of cervicothoracic manipulation and range-of-motion exercises followed by 6 sessions of stretching and strengthening exercise (manipulative-therapy-plus-exercise group). Outcomes of disability (Shoulder Pain and Disability Index, shortened version of the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand Questionnaire) and pain (numeric pain-rating scale) were collected at baseline, 1 week, 4 weeks, and 6 months. Time, treatment group, status of predictor variables, and 2-way and 3-way interactions were analyzed using linear mixed models with repeated measures. Results There were no significant 3-way interactions for either disability (P = .27) or pain scores (P = .70) for time, group, and predictor status for any of the predictor variables. Conclusion The results of the current study did not validate the previously identified prognostic variables; therefore, we cannot support using these in clinical practice. Further updating of the existing prediction rule may be warranted and could potentially result in new prognostic variables and improved generalizability. Limitations of the study were a mean duration of symptoms of greater than 2 years and a loss to follow-up of 19% at 6 months. Level of Evidence Prognosis, level 1b. Trial prospectively registered March 30, 2012 at www.clinicaltrials.gov (NCT01571674). J Orthop Sports Phys Ther 2017;47(4):252-260. Epub 3 Mar 2017. doi:10.2519/jospt.2017.7100.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0190-6011</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1938-1344</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.2519/jospt.2017.7100</identifier><identifier>PMID: 28257617</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States</publisher><subject>Adult ; Cervical Vertebrae ; Decision Support Techniques ; Disability Evaluation ; Exercise Therapy ; Female ; Humans ; Male ; Manipulation, Spinal ; Middle Aged ; Prognosis ; Shoulder Pain - therapy ; Surveys and Questionnaires ; Thoracic Vertebrae</subject><ispartof>The journal of orthopaedic and sports physical therapy, 2017-04, Vol.47 (4), p.252-260</ispartof><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c297t-f6b26c97cb0c44cabfab88c8dd5948ba2f5ad550ecbef190bbcbcbc1c6b2c1d63</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c297t-f6b26c97cb0c44cabfab88c8dd5948ba2f5ad550ecbef190bbcbcbc1c6b2c1d63</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28257617$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Mintken, Paul E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McDevitt, Amy W</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Michener, Lori A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Boyles, Robert E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Beardslee, Amber R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Burns, Scott A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Haberl, Matthew D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hinrichs, Lauren A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cleland, Joshua A</creatorcontrib><title>Examination of the Validity of a Clinical Prediction Rule to Identify Patients With Shoulder Pain Likely to Benefit From Cervicothoracic Manipulation</title><title>The journal of orthopaedic and sports physical therapy</title><addtitle>J Orthop Sports Phys Ther</addtitle><description>Study Design Secondary analysis of a randomized controlled trial. Background Prognostic variables identifying patients with shoulder pain who are likely to respond to cervicothoracic manipulation have been reported; however, they have yet to be validated. Objective To examine the validity of previously reported prognostic variables in predicting which patients with shoulder pain will respond to cervicothoracic manipulation. Methods Participants (n = 140) with a report of shoulder pain were randomly assigned to receive either 2 sessions of range-of-motion exercises plus 6 sessions of stretching and strengthening exercises (exercise group), or 2 sessions of cervicothoracic manipulation and range-of-motion exercises followed by 6 sessions of stretching and strengthening exercise (manipulative-therapy-plus-exercise group). Outcomes of disability (Shoulder Pain and Disability Index, shortened version of the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand Questionnaire) and pain (numeric pain-rating scale) were collected at baseline, 1 week, 4 weeks, and 6 months. Time, treatment group, status of predictor variables, and 2-way and 3-way interactions were analyzed using linear mixed models with repeated measures. Results There were no significant 3-way interactions for either disability (P = .27) or pain scores (P = .70) for time, group, and predictor status for any of the predictor variables. Conclusion The results of the current study did not validate the previously identified prognostic variables; therefore, we cannot support using these in clinical practice. Further updating of the existing prediction rule may be warranted and could potentially result in new prognostic variables and improved generalizability. Limitations of the study were a mean duration of symptoms of greater than 2 years and a loss to follow-up of 19% at 6 months. Level of Evidence Prognosis, level 1b. Trial prospectively registered March 30, 2012 at www.clinicaltrials.gov (NCT01571674). J Orthop Sports Phys Ther 2017;47(4):252-260. Epub 3 Mar 2017. doi:10.2519/jospt.2017.7100.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Cervical Vertebrae</subject><subject>Decision Support Techniques</subject><subject>Disability Evaluation</subject><subject>Exercise Therapy</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Manipulation, Spinal</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Prognosis</subject><subject>Shoulder Pain - therapy</subject><subject>Surveys and Questionnaires</subject><subject>Thoracic Vertebrae</subject><issn>0190-6011</issn><issn>1938-1344</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2017</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNo9kU1v1DAQhi0EokvhzA35yCVbO-t8HWHVQqVFVHweI3s81k5x4sV2KvaH8H9Jti3jw4yt531lzcvYaynWZSW7i9uQDnldCtmsGynEE7aS3aYt5Eapp2wlZCeKWkh5xl6kdCvmUkI9Z2dlW1ZNLZsV-3v5Rw806kxh5MHxvEf-Q3uylI_LXfOtp5FAe34T0RKcwC-TR54Dv7Y4ZnJHfjMbzGPiPynv-dd9mLzFOD_TyHf0C_1xwd_jiI4yv4ph4FuMdwQh70PUQMA_6ZEOkz_95CV75rRP-Oqhn7PvV5ffth-L3ecP19t3uwLKrsmFq01ZQ9eAEaAUaOO0aVtora061RpdukrbqhIIBt28C2NgORJmHUhbb87Z23vfQwy_J0y5HygBeq9HDFPqZdsopVrRlDN6cY9CDClFdP0h0qDjsZeiX7LoT1n0Sxb9ksWsePNgPpkB7X_-cfmbf0Htils</recordid><startdate>201704</startdate><enddate>201704</enddate><creator>Mintken, Paul E</creator><creator>McDevitt, Amy W</creator><creator>Michener, Lori A</creator><creator>Boyles, Robert E</creator><creator>Beardslee, Amber R</creator><creator>Burns, Scott A</creator><creator>Haberl, Matthew D</creator><creator>Hinrichs, Lauren A</creator><creator>Cleland, Joshua A</creator><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201704</creationdate><title>Examination of the Validity of a Clinical Prediction Rule to Identify Patients With Shoulder Pain Likely to Benefit From Cervicothoracic Manipulation</title><author>Mintken, Paul E ; McDevitt, Amy W ; Michener, Lori A ; Boyles, Robert E ; Beardslee, Amber R ; Burns, Scott A ; Haberl, Matthew D ; Hinrichs, Lauren A ; Cleland, Joshua A</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c297t-f6b26c97cb0c44cabfab88c8dd5948ba2f5ad550ecbef190bbcbcbc1c6b2c1d63</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2017</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Cervical Vertebrae</topic><topic>Decision Support Techniques</topic><topic>Disability Evaluation</topic><topic>Exercise Therapy</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Manipulation, Spinal</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Prognosis</topic><topic>Shoulder Pain - therapy</topic><topic>Surveys and Questionnaires</topic><topic>Thoracic Vertebrae</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Mintken, Paul E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McDevitt, Amy W</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Michener, Lori A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Boyles, Robert E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Beardslee, Amber R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Burns, Scott A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Haberl, Matthew D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hinrichs, Lauren A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cleland, Joshua A</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>The journal of orthopaedic and sports physical therapy</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Mintken, Paul E</au><au>McDevitt, Amy W</au><au>Michener, Lori A</au><au>Boyles, Robert E</au><au>Beardslee, Amber R</au><au>Burns, Scott A</au><au>Haberl, Matthew D</au><au>Hinrichs, Lauren A</au><au>Cleland, Joshua A</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Examination of the Validity of a Clinical Prediction Rule to Identify Patients With Shoulder Pain Likely to Benefit From Cervicothoracic Manipulation</atitle><jtitle>The journal of orthopaedic and sports physical therapy</jtitle><addtitle>J Orthop Sports Phys Ther</addtitle><date>2017-04</date><risdate>2017</risdate><volume>47</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>252</spage><epage>260</epage><pages>252-260</pages><issn>0190-6011</issn><eissn>1938-1344</eissn><abstract>Study Design Secondary analysis of a randomized controlled trial. Background Prognostic variables identifying patients with shoulder pain who are likely to respond to cervicothoracic manipulation have been reported; however, they have yet to be validated. Objective To examine the validity of previously reported prognostic variables in predicting which patients with shoulder pain will respond to cervicothoracic manipulation. Methods Participants (n = 140) with a report of shoulder pain were randomly assigned to receive either 2 sessions of range-of-motion exercises plus 6 sessions of stretching and strengthening exercises (exercise group), or 2 sessions of cervicothoracic manipulation and range-of-motion exercises followed by 6 sessions of stretching and strengthening exercise (manipulative-therapy-plus-exercise group). Outcomes of disability (Shoulder Pain and Disability Index, shortened version of the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand Questionnaire) and pain (numeric pain-rating scale) were collected at baseline, 1 week, 4 weeks, and 6 months. Time, treatment group, status of predictor variables, and 2-way and 3-way interactions were analyzed using linear mixed models with repeated measures. Results There were no significant 3-way interactions for either disability (P = .27) or pain scores (P = .70) for time, group, and predictor status for any of the predictor variables. Conclusion The results of the current study did not validate the previously identified prognostic variables; therefore, we cannot support using these in clinical practice. Further updating of the existing prediction rule may be warranted and could potentially result in new prognostic variables and improved generalizability. Limitations of the study were a mean duration of symptoms of greater than 2 years and a loss to follow-up of 19% at 6 months. Level of Evidence Prognosis, level 1b. Trial prospectively registered March 30, 2012 at www.clinicaltrials.gov (NCT01571674). J Orthop Sports Phys Ther 2017;47(4):252-260. Epub 3 Mar 2017. doi:10.2519/jospt.2017.7100.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pmid>28257617</pmid><doi>10.2519/jospt.2017.7100</doi><tpages>9</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0190-6011
ispartof The journal of orthopaedic and sports physical therapy, 2017-04, Vol.47 (4), p.252-260
issn 0190-6011
1938-1344
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1874448072
source MEDLINE; Journals@Ovid Complete; EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals
subjects Adult
Cervical Vertebrae
Decision Support Techniques
Disability Evaluation
Exercise Therapy
Female
Humans
Male
Manipulation, Spinal
Middle Aged
Prognosis
Shoulder Pain - therapy
Surveys and Questionnaires
Thoracic Vertebrae
title Examination of the Validity of a Clinical Prediction Rule to Identify Patients With Shoulder Pain Likely to Benefit From Cervicothoracic Manipulation
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-23T19%3A41%3A44IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Examination%20of%20the%20Validity%20of%20a%20Clinical%20Prediction%20Rule%20to%20Identify%20Patients%20With%20Shoulder%20Pain%20Likely%20to%20Benefit%20From%20Cervicothoracic%20Manipulation&rft.jtitle=The%20journal%20of%20orthopaedic%20and%20sports%20physical%20therapy&rft.au=Mintken,%20Paul%20E&rft.date=2017-04&rft.volume=47&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=252&rft.epage=260&rft.pages=252-260&rft.issn=0190-6011&rft.eissn=1938-1344&rft_id=info:doi/10.2519/jospt.2017.7100&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1874448072%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1874448072&rft_id=info:pmid/28257617&rfr_iscdi=true