Initial psychometric testing and validation of the patient participation in pressure injury prevention scale
Aims The aim of this study was to develop the Patient Participation in Pressure injury Prevention (PPPIP) scale and undertake initial testing of some of its psychometric properties. Background Clinical practice guidelines recommend patient involvement in pressure injury prevention. There is some evi...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of advanced nursing 2017-09, Vol.73 (9), p.2237-2247 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 2247 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 9 |
| container_start_page | 2237 |
| container_title | Journal of advanced nursing |
| container_volume | 73 |
| creator | Chaboyer, Wendy Harbeck, Emma Bucknall, Tracey McInnes, Elizabeth Thalib, Lukman Whitty, Jennifer Wallis, Marianne Gillespie, Brigid |
| description | Aims
The aim of this study was to develop the Patient Participation in Pressure injury Prevention (PPPIP) scale and undertake initial testing of some of its psychometric properties.
Background
Clinical practice guidelines recommend patient involvement in pressure injury prevention. There is some evidence that patients are willing to participate in this activity, but there are currently no instruments to measure this participation.
Design
This methodological study used data collected as part of a cluster randomized trial to develop and test the PPPIP scale.
Methods
A sample of 688 of patients with complete PPPIP scale data was used. A stratified random subsample, (Subsample A) was created and the remainder became Subsample B. Item analysis, exploratory factor analysis and Cronbach's alpha reliability were undertaken in Subsample A. Confirmatory factor analysis and Cronbach's alpha reliability were undertaken in Subsample B. Data collection occurred between June 2014 ‐ May 2015.
Results
In Subsample A (n = 320), inter‐item correlations, item total correlations met the acceptance criteria and an exploratory factor analysis identified a one factor solution. In Subsample B (n = 368), the confirmatory factor analysis supported this one factor. In both subsamples, the Cronbach's alpha was 0·86.
Conclusion
This study provides preliminary evidence of acceptable reliability and validity of the PPPIP scale in two subsamples of hospitalized patients who had limited mobility. It may be used in research and quality improvement activities. As a better conceptual understanding of patient participation emerges, the PPPIP scale may require refinement. |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1111/jan.13289 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1873721407</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1928255730</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3889-a05473db5148b7faf2f97a7bc5fee39c403dd14338da61273d671a7fe9248dfe3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kU1PwzAMhiMEYmNw4A-gSlzg0JGPdkmP08THEIILnKMsdVimLi1JC-q_J6PAAQlfbMuPXtl-EToleEpiXG2UmxJGRbGHxoTN8pTOMrGPxpjhIqUZpiN0FMIG4whReohGVNCc0pyNUbV0trWqSprQ63W9hdZbnbQQWuteE-XK5F1VtlStrV1Sm6RdQ9LEDlwbs2-tts0wtC5pPITQeYj1pvP9rn-P4G4atKrgGB0YVQU4-c4T9HJz_by4Sx-ebpeL-UOqmRBFqnCecVaucpKJFTfKUFNwxVc6NwCs0BlmZUkyxkSpZoRGdMaJ4gYKmonSAJugi0G38fVbF2-RWxs0VJVyUHdBEsEZpyTDPKLnf9BN3XkXt5Ok2L0p5wxH6nKgtK9D8GBk4-1W-V4SLHcWyGiB_LIgsmffit1qC-Uv-fPzCFwNwIetoP9fSd7PHwfJT50Wkag</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1928255730</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Initial psychometric testing and validation of the patient participation in pressure injury prevention scale</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Wiley Journals</source><source>Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA)</source><creator>Chaboyer, Wendy ; Harbeck, Emma ; Bucknall, Tracey ; McInnes, Elizabeth ; Thalib, Lukman ; Whitty, Jennifer ; Wallis, Marianne ; Gillespie, Brigid</creator><creatorcontrib>Chaboyer, Wendy ; Harbeck, Emma ; Bucknall, Tracey ; McInnes, Elizabeth ; Thalib, Lukman ; Whitty, Jennifer ; Wallis, Marianne ; Gillespie, Brigid</creatorcontrib><description>Aims
The aim of this study was to develop the Patient Participation in Pressure injury Prevention (PPPIP) scale and undertake initial testing of some of its psychometric properties.
Background
Clinical practice guidelines recommend patient involvement in pressure injury prevention. There is some evidence that patients are willing to participate in this activity, but there are currently no instruments to measure this participation.
Design
This methodological study used data collected as part of a cluster randomized trial to develop and test the PPPIP scale.
Methods
A sample of 688 of patients with complete PPPIP scale data was used. A stratified random subsample, (Subsample A) was created and the remainder became Subsample B. Item analysis, exploratory factor analysis and Cronbach's alpha reliability were undertaken in Subsample A. Confirmatory factor analysis and Cronbach's alpha reliability were undertaken in Subsample B. Data collection occurred between June 2014 ‐ May 2015.
Results
In Subsample A (n = 320), inter‐item correlations, item total correlations met the acceptance criteria and an exploratory factor analysis identified a one factor solution. In Subsample B (n = 368), the confirmatory factor analysis supported this one factor. In both subsamples, the Cronbach's alpha was 0·86.
Conclusion
This study provides preliminary evidence of acceptable reliability and validity of the PPPIP scale in two subsamples of hospitalized patients who had limited mobility. It may be used in research and quality improvement activities. As a better conceptual understanding of patient participation emerges, the PPPIP scale may require refinement.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0309-2402</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1365-2648</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/jan.13289</identifier><identifier>PMID: 28252253</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</publisher><subject>Aged ; Aged, 80 and over ; Clinical medicine ; Clinical practice guidelines ; Conceptual knowledge ; Confirmatory factor analysis ; Cronbach's alpha ; Discriminant analysis ; Exploratory factor analysis ; Female ; Health behavior ; Hospitalized ; Humans ; Injuries ; Injury prevention ; instrument development ; Male ; Mobility ; nurses ; Nursing ; nursing sensitive patient indicators ; Participation ; Patient compliance ; patient outcomes ; Patient participation ; Patient Participation - psychology ; Patient Participation - statistics & numerical data ; patient perspectives ; Patients ; pressure injury prevention ; Pressure Ulcer - prevention & control ; Pressure Ulcer - psychology ; pressure ulcer prevention ; Pressure ulcers ; Prevention ; psychometric testing ; Psychometrics - instrumentation ; Psychometrics - methods ; Quality management ; Quantitative psychology ; Reliability ; Reproducibility of Results ; Surveys and Questionnaires ; Validity</subject><ispartof>Journal of advanced nursing, 2017-09, Vol.73 (9), p.2237-2247</ispartof><rights>2017 John Wiley & Sons Ltd</rights><rights>2017 John Wiley & Sons Ltd.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3889-a05473db5148b7faf2f97a7bc5fee39c403dd14338da61273d671a7fe9248dfe3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3889-a05473db5148b7faf2f97a7bc5fee39c403dd14338da61273d671a7fe9248dfe3</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-3186-5691 ; 0000-0001-9528-7814</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111%2Fjan.13289$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111%2Fjan.13289$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,1417,27924,27925,30999,45574,45575</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28252253$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Chaboyer, Wendy</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Harbeck, Emma</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bucknall, Tracey</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McInnes, Elizabeth</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Thalib, Lukman</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Whitty, Jennifer</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wallis, Marianne</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gillespie, Brigid</creatorcontrib><title>Initial psychometric testing and validation of the patient participation in pressure injury prevention scale</title><title>Journal of advanced nursing</title><addtitle>J Adv Nurs</addtitle><description>Aims
The aim of this study was to develop the Patient Participation in Pressure injury Prevention (PPPIP) scale and undertake initial testing of some of its psychometric properties.
Background
Clinical practice guidelines recommend patient involvement in pressure injury prevention. There is some evidence that patients are willing to participate in this activity, but there are currently no instruments to measure this participation.
Design
This methodological study used data collected as part of a cluster randomized trial to develop and test the PPPIP scale.
Methods
A sample of 688 of patients with complete PPPIP scale data was used. A stratified random subsample, (Subsample A) was created and the remainder became Subsample B. Item analysis, exploratory factor analysis and Cronbach's alpha reliability were undertaken in Subsample A. Confirmatory factor analysis and Cronbach's alpha reliability were undertaken in Subsample B. Data collection occurred between June 2014 ‐ May 2015.
Results
In Subsample A (n = 320), inter‐item correlations, item total correlations met the acceptance criteria and an exploratory factor analysis identified a one factor solution. In Subsample B (n = 368), the confirmatory factor analysis supported this one factor. In both subsamples, the Cronbach's alpha was 0·86.
Conclusion
This study provides preliminary evidence of acceptable reliability and validity of the PPPIP scale in two subsamples of hospitalized patients who had limited mobility. It may be used in research and quality improvement activities. As a better conceptual understanding of patient participation emerges, the PPPIP scale may require refinement.</description><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Aged, 80 and over</subject><subject>Clinical medicine</subject><subject>Clinical practice guidelines</subject><subject>Conceptual knowledge</subject><subject>Confirmatory factor analysis</subject><subject>Cronbach's alpha</subject><subject>Discriminant analysis</subject><subject>Exploratory factor analysis</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Health behavior</subject><subject>Hospitalized</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Injuries</subject><subject>Injury prevention</subject><subject>instrument development</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Mobility</subject><subject>nurses</subject><subject>Nursing</subject><subject>nursing sensitive patient indicators</subject><subject>Participation</subject><subject>Patient compliance</subject><subject>patient outcomes</subject><subject>Patient participation</subject><subject>Patient Participation - psychology</subject><subject>Patient Participation - statistics & numerical data</subject><subject>patient perspectives</subject><subject>Patients</subject><subject>pressure injury prevention</subject><subject>Pressure Ulcer - prevention & control</subject><subject>Pressure Ulcer - psychology</subject><subject>pressure ulcer prevention</subject><subject>Pressure ulcers</subject><subject>Prevention</subject><subject>psychometric testing</subject><subject>Psychometrics - instrumentation</subject><subject>Psychometrics - methods</subject><subject>Quality management</subject><subject>Quantitative psychology</subject><subject>Reliability</subject><subject>Reproducibility of Results</subject><subject>Surveys and Questionnaires</subject><subject>Validity</subject><issn>0309-2402</issn><issn>1365-2648</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2017</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>7QJ</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kU1PwzAMhiMEYmNw4A-gSlzg0JGPdkmP08THEIILnKMsdVimLi1JC-q_J6PAAQlfbMuPXtl-EToleEpiXG2UmxJGRbGHxoTN8pTOMrGPxpjhIqUZpiN0FMIG4whReohGVNCc0pyNUbV0trWqSprQ63W9hdZbnbQQWuteE-XK5F1VtlStrV1Sm6RdQ9LEDlwbs2-tts0wtC5pPITQeYj1pvP9rn-P4G4atKrgGB0YVQU4-c4T9HJz_by4Sx-ebpeL-UOqmRBFqnCecVaucpKJFTfKUFNwxVc6NwCs0BlmZUkyxkSpZoRGdMaJ4gYKmonSAJugi0G38fVbF2-RWxs0VJVyUHdBEsEZpyTDPKLnf9BN3XkXt5Ok2L0p5wxH6nKgtK9D8GBk4-1W-V4SLHcWyGiB_LIgsmffit1qC-Uv-fPzCFwNwIetoP9fSd7PHwfJT50Wkag</recordid><startdate>201709</startdate><enddate>201709</enddate><creator>Chaboyer, Wendy</creator><creator>Harbeck, Emma</creator><creator>Bucknall, Tracey</creator><creator>McInnes, Elizabeth</creator><creator>Thalib, Lukman</creator><creator>Whitty, Jennifer</creator><creator>Wallis, Marianne</creator><creator>Gillespie, Brigid</creator><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QJ</scope><scope>ASE</scope><scope>FPQ</scope><scope>K6X</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3186-5691</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9528-7814</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>201709</creationdate><title>Initial psychometric testing and validation of the patient participation in pressure injury prevention scale</title><author>Chaboyer, Wendy ; Harbeck, Emma ; Bucknall, Tracey ; McInnes, Elizabeth ; Thalib, Lukman ; Whitty, Jennifer ; Wallis, Marianne ; Gillespie, Brigid</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3889-a05473db5148b7faf2f97a7bc5fee39c403dd14338da61273d671a7fe9248dfe3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2017</creationdate><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Aged, 80 and over</topic><topic>Clinical medicine</topic><topic>Clinical practice guidelines</topic><topic>Conceptual knowledge</topic><topic>Confirmatory factor analysis</topic><topic>Cronbach's alpha</topic><topic>Discriminant analysis</topic><topic>Exploratory factor analysis</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Health behavior</topic><topic>Hospitalized</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Injuries</topic><topic>Injury prevention</topic><topic>instrument development</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Mobility</topic><topic>nurses</topic><topic>Nursing</topic><topic>nursing sensitive patient indicators</topic><topic>Participation</topic><topic>Patient compliance</topic><topic>patient outcomes</topic><topic>Patient participation</topic><topic>Patient Participation - psychology</topic><topic>Patient Participation - statistics & numerical data</topic><topic>patient perspectives</topic><topic>Patients</topic><topic>pressure injury prevention</topic><topic>Pressure Ulcer - prevention & control</topic><topic>Pressure Ulcer - psychology</topic><topic>pressure ulcer prevention</topic><topic>Pressure ulcers</topic><topic>Prevention</topic><topic>psychometric testing</topic><topic>Psychometrics - instrumentation</topic><topic>Psychometrics - methods</topic><topic>Quality management</topic><topic>Quantitative psychology</topic><topic>Reliability</topic><topic>Reproducibility of Results</topic><topic>Surveys and Questionnaires</topic><topic>Validity</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Chaboyer, Wendy</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Harbeck, Emma</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bucknall, Tracey</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McInnes, Elizabeth</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Thalib, Lukman</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Whitty, Jennifer</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wallis, Marianne</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gillespie, Brigid</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA)</collection><collection>British Nursing Index</collection><collection>British Nursing Index (BNI) (1985 to Present)</collection><collection>British Nursing Index</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of advanced nursing</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Chaboyer, Wendy</au><au>Harbeck, Emma</au><au>Bucknall, Tracey</au><au>McInnes, Elizabeth</au><au>Thalib, Lukman</au><au>Whitty, Jennifer</au><au>Wallis, Marianne</au><au>Gillespie, Brigid</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Initial psychometric testing and validation of the patient participation in pressure injury prevention scale</atitle><jtitle>Journal of advanced nursing</jtitle><addtitle>J Adv Nurs</addtitle><date>2017-09</date><risdate>2017</risdate><volume>73</volume><issue>9</issue><spage>2237</spage><epage>2247</epage><pages>2237-2247</pages><issn>0309-2402</issn><eissn>1365-2648</eissn><abstract>Aims
The aim of this study was to develop the Patient Participation in Pressure injury Prevention (PPPIP) scale and undertake initial testing of some of its psychometric properties.
Background
Clinical practice guidelines recommend patient involvement in pressure injury prevention. There is some evidence that patients are willing to participate in this activity, but there are currently no instruments to measure this participation.
Design
This methodological study used data collected as part of a cluster randomized trial to develop and test the PPPIP scale.
Methods
A sample of 688 of patients with complete PPPIP scale data was used. A stratified random subsample, (Subsample A) was created and the remainder became Subsample B. Item analysis, exploratory factor analysis and Cronbach's alpha reliability were undertaken in Subsample A. Confirmatory factor analysis and Cronbach's alpha reliability were undertaken in Subsample B. Data collection occurred between June 2014 ‐ May 2015.
Results
In Subsample A (n = 320), inter‐item correlations, item total correlations met the acceptance criteria and an exploratory factor analysis identified a one factor solution. In Subsample B (n = 368), the confirmatory factor analysis supported this one factor. In both subsamples, the Cronbach's alpha was 0·86.
Conclusion
This study provides preliminary evidence of acceptable reliability and validity of the PPPIP scale in two subsamples of hospitalized patients who had limited mobility. It may be used in research and quality improvement activities. As a better conceptual understanding of patient participation emerges, the PPPIP scale may require refinement.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</pub><pmid>28252253</pmid><doi>10.1111/jan.13289</doi><tpages>11</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3186-5691</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9528-7814</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 0309-2402 |
| ispartof | Journal of advanced nursing, 2017-09, Vol.73 (9), p.2237-2247 |
| issn | 0309-2402 1365-2648 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1873721407 |
| source | MEDLINE; Wiley Journals; Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA) |
| subjects | Aged Aged, 80 and over Clinical medicine Clinical practice guidelines Conceptual knowledge Confirmatory factor analysis Cronbach's alpha Discriminant analysis Exploratory factor analysis Female Health behavior Hospitalized Humans Injuries Injury prevention instrument development Male Mobility nurses Nursing nursing sensitive patient indicators Participation Patient compliance patient outcomes Patient participation Patient Participation - psychology Patient Participation - statistics & numerical data patient perspectives Patients pressure injury prevention Pressure Ulcer - prevention & control Pressure Ulcer - psychology pressure ulcer prevention Pressure ulcers Prevention psychometric testing Psychometrics - instrumentation Psychometrics - methods Quality management Quantitative psychology Reliability Reproducibility of Results Surveys and Questionnaires Validity |
| title | Initial psychometric testing and validation of the patient participation in pressure injury prevention scale |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-04T02%3A21%3A20IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Initial%20psychometric%20testing%20and%20validation%20of%20the%20patient%20participation%20in%20pressure%20injury%20prevention%20scale&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20advanced%20nursing&rft.au=Chaboyer,%20Wendy&rft.date=2017-09&rft.volume=73&rft.issue=9&rft.spage=2237&rft.epage=2247&rft.pages=2237-2247&rft.issn=0309-2402&rft.eissn=1365-2648&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/jan.13289&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1928255730%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1928255730&rft_id=info:pmid/28252253&rfr_iscdi=true |