Vitamin D assays in clinical laboratory: Past, present and future challenges
•The future of analytical measurement of vitamin D will depend on separation steps.•Effort to Standardization vitamin D assay.•Guidelines for testing of Vitamin D stated that no practical reason for most people to get a vitamin D test. Vitamin D status is usually assessed by measuring the serum 25-h...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | The Journal of steroid biochemistry and molecular biology 2018-01, Vol.175, p.136-137 |
---|---|
1. Verfasser: | |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 137 |
---|---|
container_issue | |
container_start_page | 136 |
container_title | The Journal of steroid biochemistry and molecular biology |
container_volume | 175 |
creator | Atef, Shereen H. |
description | •The future of analytical measurement of vitamin D will depend on separation steps.•Effort to Standardization vitamin D assay.•Guidelines for testing of Vitamin D stated that no practical reason for most people to get a vitamin D test.
Vitamin D status is usually assessed by measuring the serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D (25(OH)D) concentration. There has been a dramatic increase in 25-OHD requests over recent years prompting many laboratories to consider the use of automated immunoassays. In this presentation, we will discuss and compare the two major techniques that are used for measuring of vitamin D (the binding assay and chemical assay techniques).
Chemiluminescence immunoassays (CLIA), radioimmunoassy (RIA), and binding protein assay are belonging to the binding assay, while the chemical assay includes high performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) and liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (LC–MS/MS). Significant differences in the 25(OH)D determination were observed between various assays. Standardization and harmonization of 25(OH)D measurements are therefore urgently needed. The widespread introduction of well standardized assays in clinical laboratories is the challenge in the next years. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.jsbmb.2017.02.011 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1872884215</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0960076017300468</els_id><sourcerecordid>1872884215</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c359t-8e1670ce32486362e3f560ec9216eee005a26d209fa1387977826ed2d0fa997e3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kMtOwzAQRS0EoqXwBUjISxYkjMetkyCxQOUpVYIFsLUcZwKu8ih2gtS_J6XAktXM4ty5msPYsYBYgFDny3gZ8jqPEUQSA8YgxA4bizTJIoEIu2wMmYIIEgUjdhDCEgCkFMk-G2GKU0SFY7Z4dZ2pXcOvuQnBrAMfdlu5xllT8crkrTdd69cX_MmE7oyvPAVqOm6agpd913vi9t1UFTVvFA7ZXmmqQEc_c8Jebm-e5_fR4vHuYX61iKycZV2UklAJWJI4TZVUSLKcKSCboVBEBDAzqAqErDRCDu8kSYqKCiygNFmWkJyw0-3dlW8_egqdrl2wVFWmobYPenCAaTpFMRtQuUWtb0PwVOqVd7Xxay1AbzTqpf7WqDcaNaAeNA6pk5-CPq-p-Mv8ehuAyy1Aw5ufjrwO1lFjqXCebKeL1v1b8AWfj4M9</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1872884215</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Vitamin D assays in clinical laboratory: Past, present and future challenges</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Access via ScienceDirect (Elsevier)</source><creator>Atef, Shereen H.</creator><creatorcontrib>Atef, Shereen H.</creatorcontrib><description>•The future of analytical measurement of vitamin D will depend on separation steps.•Effort to Standardization vitamin D assay.•Guidelines for testing of Vitamin D stated that no practical reason for most people to get a vitamin D test.
Vitamin D status is usually assessed by measuring the serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D (25(OH)D) concentration. There has been a dramatic increase in 25-OHD requests over recent years prompting many laboratories to consider the use of automated immunoassays. In this presentation, we will discuss and compare the two major techniques that are used for measuring of vitamin D (the binding assay and chemical assay techniques).
Chemiluminescence immunoassays (CLIA), radioimmunoassy (RIA), and binding protein assay are belonging to the binding assay, while the chemical assay includes high performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) and liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (LC–MS/MS). Significant differences in the 25(OH)D determination were observed between various assays. Standardization and harmonization of 25(OH)D measurements are therefore urgently needed. The widespread introduction of well standardized assays in clinical laboratories is the challenge in the next years.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0960-0760</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1879-1220</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.jsbmb.2017.02.011</identifier><identifier>PMID: 28242262</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>25-Hydroxyvitamin D 2 - blood ; Calcifediol - blood ; Chromatography, Liquid - methods ; Chromatography, Liquid - standards ; CLIA ; Competitive-protein binding assay ; HPLC ; Humans ; Immunoassay - standards ; RIA ; Tandem Mass Spectrometry - methods ; Tandem Mass Spectrometry - standards ; Vitamin D</subject><ispartof>The Journal of steroid biochemistry and molecular biology, 2018-01, Vol.175, p.136-137</ispartof><rights>2017 Elsevier Ltd</rights><rights>Copyright © 2017 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c359t-8e1670ce32486362e3f560ec9216eee005a26d209fa1387977826ed2d0fa997e3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c359t-8e1670ce32486362e3f560ec9216eee005a26d209fa1387977826ed2d0fa997e3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jsbmb.2017.02.011$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,3550,27924,27925,45995</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28242262$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Atef, Shereen H.</creatorcontrib><title>Vitamin D assays in clinical laboratory: Past, present and future challenges</title><title>The Journal of steroid biochemistry and molecular biology</title><addtitle>J Steroid Biochem Mol Biol</addtitle><description>•The future of analytical measurement of vitamin D will depend on separation steps.•Effort to Standardization vitamin D assay.•Guidelines for testing of Vitamin D stated that no practical reason for most people to get a vitamin D test.
Vitamin D status is usually assessed by measuring the serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D (25(OH)D) concentration. There has been a dramatic increase in 25-OHD requests over recent years prompting many laboratories to consider the use of automated immunoassays. In this presentation, we will discuss and compare the two major techniques that are used for measuring of vitamin D (the binding assay and chemical assay techniques).
Chemiluminescence immunoassays (CLIA), radioimmunoassy (RIA), and binding protein assay are belonging to the binding assay, while the chemical assay includes high performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) and liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (LC–MS/MS). Significant differences in the 25(OH)D determination were observed between various assays. Standardization and harmonization of 25(OH)D measurements are therefore urgently needed. The widespread introduction of well standardized assays in clinical laboratories is the challenge in the next years.</description><subject>25-Hydroxyvitamin D 2 - blood</subject><subject>Calcifediol - blood</subject><subject>Chromatography, Liquid - methods</subject><subject>Chromatography, Liquid - standards</subject><subject>CLIA</subject><subject>Competitive-protein binding assay</subject><subject>HPLC</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Immunoassay - standards</subject><subject>RIA</subject><subject>Tandem Mass Spectrometry - methods</subject><subject>Tandem Mass Spectrometry - standards</subject><subject>Vitamin D</subject><issn>0960-0760</issn><issn>1879-1220</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2018</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kMtOwzAQRS0EoqXwBUjISxYkjMetkyCxQOUpVYIFsLUcZwKu8ih2gtS_J6XAktXM4ty5msPYsYBYgFDny3gZ8jqPEUQSA8YgxA4bizTJIoEIu2wMmYIIEgUjdhDCEgCkFMk-G2GKU0SFY7Z4dZ2pXcOvuQnBrAMfdlu5xllT8crkrTdd69cX_MmE7oyvPAVqOm6agpd913vi9t1UFTVvFA7ZXmmqQEc_c8Jebm-e5_fR4vHuYX61iKycZV2UklAJWJI4TZVUSLKcKSCboVBEBDAzqAqErDRCDu8kSYqKCiygNFmWkJyw0-3dlW8_egqdrl2wVFWmobYPenCAaTpFMRtQuUWtb0PwVOqVd7Xxay1AbzTqpf7WqDcaNaAeNA6pk5-CPq-p-Mv8ehuAyy1Aw5ufjrwO1lFjqXCebKeL1v1b8AWfj4M9</recordid><startdate>201801</startdate><enddate>201801</enddate><creator>Atef, Shereen H.</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201801</creationdate><title>Vitamin D assays in clinical laboratory: Past, present and future challenges</title><author>Atef, Shereen H.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c359t-8e1670ce32486362e3f560ec9216eee005a26d209fa1387977826ed2d0fa997e3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2018</creationdate><topic>25-Hydroxyvitamin D 2 - blood</topic><topic>Calcifediol - blood</topic><topic>Chromatography, Liquid - methods</topic><topic>Chromatography, Liquid - standards</topic><topic>CLIA</topic><topic>Competitive-protein binding assay</topic><topic>HPLC</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Immunoassay - standards</topic><topic>RIA</topic><topic>Tandem Mass Spectrometry - methods</topic><topic>Tandem Mass Spectrometry - standards</topic><topic>Vitamin D</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Atef, Shereen H.</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>The Journal of steroid biochemistry and molecular biology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Atef, Shereen H.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Vitamin D assays in clinical laboratory: Past, present and future challenges</atitle><jtitle>The Journal of steroid biochemistry and molecular biology</jtitle><addtitle>J Steroid Biochem Mol Biol</addtitle><date>2018-01</date><risdate>2018</risdate><volume>175</volume><spage>136</spage><epage>137</epage><pages>136-137</pages><issn>0960-0760</issn><eissn>1879-1220</eissn><abstract>•The future of analytical measurement of vitamin D will depend on separation steps.•Effort to Standardization vitamin D assay.•Guidelines for testing of Vitamin D stated that no practical reason for most people to get a vitamin D test.
Vitamin D status is usually assessed by measuring the serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D (25(OH)D) concentration. There has been a dramatic increase in 25-OHD requests over recent years prompting many laboratories to consider the use of automated immunoassays. In this presentation, we will discuss and compare the two major techniques that are used for measuring of vitamin D (the binding assay and chemical assay techniques).
Chemiluminescence immunoassays (CLIA), radioimmunoassy (RIA), and binding protein assay are belonging to the binding assay, while the chemical assay includes high performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) and liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (LC–MS/MS). Significant differences in the 25(OH)D determination were observed between various assays. Standardization and harmonization of 25(OH)D measurements are therefore urgently needed. The widespread introduction of well standardized assays in clinical laboratories is the challenge in the next years.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><pmid>28242262</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.jsbmb.2017.02.011</doi><tpages>2</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0960-0760 |
ispartof | The Journal of steroid biochemistry and molecular biology, 2018-01, Vol.175, p.136-137 |
issn | 0960-0760 1879-1220 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1872884215 |
source | MEDLINE; Access via ScienceDirect (Elsevier) |
subjects | 25-Hydroxyvitamin D 2 - blood Calcifediol - blood Chromatography, Liquid - methods Chromatography, Liquid - standards CLIA Competitive-protein binding assay HPLC Humans Immunoassay - standards RIA Tandem Mass Spectrometry - methods Tandem Mass Spectrometry - standards Vitamin D |
title | Vitamin D assays in clinical laboratory: Past, present and future challenges |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-22T05%3A23%3A03IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Vitamin%20D%20assays%20in%20clinical%20laboratory:%20Past,%20present%20and%20future%20challenges&rft.jtitle=The%20Journal%20of%20steroid%20biochemistry%20and%20molecular%20biology&rft.au=Atef,%20Shereen%20H.&rft.date=2018-01&rft.volume=175&rft.spage=136&rft.epage=137&rft.pages=136-137&rft.issn=0960-0760&rft.eissn=1879-1220&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.jsbmb.2017.02.011&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1872884215%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1872884215&rft_id=info:pmid/28242262&rft_els_id=S0960076017300468&rfr_iscdi=true |