Vitamin D assays in clinical laboratory: Past, present and future challenges

•The future of analytical measurement of vitamin D will depend on separation steps.•Effort to Standardization vitamin D assay.•Guidelines for testing of Vitamin D stated that no practical reason for most people to get a vitamin D test. Vitamin D status is usually assessed by measuring the serum 25-h...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:The Journal of steroid biochemistry and molecular biology 2018-01, Vol.175, p.136-137
1. Verfasser: Atef, Shereen H.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 137
container_issue
container_start_page 136
container_title The Journal of steroid biochemistry and molecular biology
container_volume 175
creator Atef, Shereen H.
description •The future of analytical measurement of vitamin D will depend on separation steps.•Effort to Standardization vitamin D assay.•Guidelines for testing of Vitamin D stated that no practical reason for most people to get a vitamin D test. Vitamin D status is usually assessed by measuring the serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D (25(OH)D) concentration. There has been a dramatic increase in 25-OHD requests over recent years prompting many laboratories to consider the use of automated immunoassays. In this presentation, we will discuss and compare the two major techniques that are used for measuring of vitamin D (the binding assay and chemical assay techniques). Chemiluminescence immunoassays (CLIA), radioimmunoassy (RIA), and binding protein assay are belonging to the binding assay, while the chemical assay includes high performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) and liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (LC–MS/MS). Significant differences in the 25(OH)D determination were observed between various assays. Standardization and harmonization of 25(OH)D measurements are therefore urgently needed. The widespread introduction of well standardized assays in clinical laboratories is the challenge in the next years.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.jsbmb.2017.02.011
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1872884215</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0960076017300468</els_id><sourcerecordid>1872884215</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c359t-8e1670ce32486362e3f560ec9216eee005a26d209fa1387977826ed2d0fa997e3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kMtOwzAQRS0EoqXwBUjISxYkjMetkyCxQOUpVYIFsLUcZwKu8ih2gtS_J6XAktXM4ty5msPYsYBYgFDny3gZ8jqPEUQSA8YgxA4bizTJIoEIu2wMmYIIEgUjdhDCEgCkFMk-G2GKU0SFY7Z4dZ2pXcOvuQnBrAMfdlu5xllT8crkrTdd69cX_MmE7oyvPAVqOm6agpd913vi9t1UFTVvFA7ZXmmqQEc_c8Jebm-e5_fR4vHuYX61iKycZV2UklAJWJI4TZVUSLKcKSCboVBEBDAzqAqErDRCDu8kSYqKCiygNFmWkJyw0-3dlW8_egqdrl2wVFWmobYPenCAaTpFMRtQuUWtb0PwVOqVd7Xxay1AbzTqpf7WqDcaNaAeNA6pk5-CPq-p-Mv8ehuAyy1Aw5ufjrwO1lFjqXCebKeL1v1b8AWfj4M9</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1872884215</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Vitamin D assays in clinical laboratory: Past, present and future challenges</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Access via ScienceDirect (Elsevier)</source><creator>Atef, Shereen H.</creator><creatorcontrib>Atef, Shereen H.</creatorcontrib><description>•The future of analytical measurement of vitamin D will depend on separation steps.•Effort to Standardization vitamin D assay.•Guidelines for testing of Vitamin D stated that no practical reason for most people to get a vitamin D test. Vitamin D status is usually assessed by measuring the serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D (25(OH)D) concentration. There has been a dramatic increase in 25-OHD requests over recent years prompting many laboratories to consider the use of automated immunoassays. In this presentation, we will discuss and compare the two major techniques that are used for measuring of vitamin D (the binding assay and chemical assay techniques). Chemiluminescence immunoassays (CLIA), radioimmunoassy (RIA), and binding protein assay are belonging to the binding assay, while the chemical assay includes high performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) and liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (LC–MS/MS). Significant differences in the 25(OH)D determination were observed between various assays. Standardization and harmonization of 25(OH)D measurements are therefore urgently needed. The widespread introduction of well standardized assays in clinical laboratories is the challenge in the next years.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0960-0760</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1879-1220</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.jsbmb.2017.02.011</identifier><identifier>PMID: 28242262</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>25-Hydroxyvitamin D 2 - blood ; Calcifediol - blood ; Chromatography, Liquid - methods ; Chromatography, Liquid - standards ; CLIA ; Competitive-protein binding assay ; HPLC ; Humans ; Immunoassay - standards ; RIA ; Tandem Mass Spectrometry - methods ; Tandem Mass Spectrometry - standards ; Vitamin D</subject><ispartof>The Journal of steroid biochemistry and molecular biology, 2018-01, Vol.175, p.136-137</ispartof><rights>2017 Elsevier Ltd</rights><rights>Copyright © 2017 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c359t-8e1670ce32486362e3f560ec9216eee005a26d209fa1387977826ed2d0fa997e3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c359t-8e1670ce32486362e3f560ec9216eee005a26d209fa1387977826ed2d0fa997e3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jsbmb.2017.02.011$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,3550,27924,27925,45995</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28242262$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Atef, Shereen H.</creatorcontrib><title>Vitamin D assays in clinical laboratory: Past, present and future challenges</title><title>The Journal of steroid biochemistry and molecular biology</title><addtitle>J Steroid Biochem Mol Biol</addtitle><description>•The future of analytical measurement of vitamin D will depend on separation steps.•Effort to Standardization vitamin D assay.•Guidelines for testing of Vitamin D stated that no practical reason for most people to get a vitamin D test. Vitamin D status is usually assessed by measuring the serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D (25(OH)D) concentration. There has been a dramatic increase in 25-OHD requests over recent years prompting many laboratories to consider the use of automated immunoassays. In this presentation, we will discuss and compare the two major techniques that are used for measuring of vitamin D (the binding assay and chemical assay techniques). Chemiluminescence immunoassays (CLIA), radioimmunoassy (RIA), and binding protein assay are belonging to the binding assay, while the chemical assay includes high performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) and liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (LC–MS/MS). Significant differences in the 25(OH)D determination were observed between various assays. Standardization and harmonization of 25(OH)D measurements are therefore urgently needed. The widespread introduction of well standardized assays in clinical laboratories is the challenge in the next years.</description><subject>25-Hydroxyvitamin D 2 - blood</subject><subject>Calcifediol - blood</subject><subject>Chromatography, Liquid - methods</subject><subject>Chromatography, Liquid - standards</subject><subject>CLIA</subject><subject>Competitive-protein binding assay</subject><subject>HPLC</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Immunoassay - standards</subject><subject>RIA</subject><subject>Tandem Mass Spectrometry - methods</subject><subject>Tandem Mass Spectrometry - standards</subject><subject>Vitamin D</subject><issn>0960-0760</issn><issn>1879-1220</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2018</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kMtOwzAQRS0EoqXwBUjISxYkjMetkyCxQOUpVYIFsLUcZwKu8ih2gtS_J6XAktXM4ty5msPYsYBYgFDny3gZ8jqPEUQSA8YgxA4bizTJIoEIu2wMmYIIEgUjdhDCEgCkFMk-G2GKU0SFY7Z4dZ2pXcOvuQnBrAMfdlu5xllT8crkrTdd69cX_MmE7oyvPAVqOm6agpd913vi9t1UFTVvFA7ZXmmqQEc_c8Jebm-e5_fR4vHuYX61iKycZV2UklAJWJI4TZVUSLKcKSCboVBEBDAzqAqErDRCDu8kSYqKCiygNFmWkJyw0-3dlW8_egqdrl2wVFWmobYPenCAaTpFMRtQuUWtb0PwVOqVd7Xxay1AbzTqpf7WqDcaNaAeNA6pk5-CPq-p-Mv8ehuAyy1Aw5ufjrwO1lFjqXCebKeL1v1b8AWfj4M9</recordid><startdate>201801</startdate><enddate>201801</enddate><creator>Atef, Shereen H.</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201801</creationdate><title>Vitamin D assays in clinical laboratory: Past, present and future challenges</title><author>Atef, Shereen H.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c359t-8e1670ce32486362e3f560ec9216eee005a26d209fa1387977826ed2d0fa997e3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2018</creationdate><topic>25-Hydroxyvitamin D 2 - blood</topic><topic>Calcifediol - blood</topic><topic>Chromatography, Liquid - methods</topic><topic>Chromatography, Liquid - standards</topic><topic>CLIA</topic><topic>Competitive-protein binding assay</topic><topic>HPLC</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Immunoassay - standards</topic><topic>RIA</topic><topic>Tandem Mass Spectrometry - methods</topic><topic>Tandem Mass Spectrometry - standards</topic><topic>Vitamin D</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Atef, Shereen H.</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>The Journal of steroid biochemistry and molecular biology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Atef, Shereen H.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Vitamin D assays in clinical laboratory: Past, present and future challenges</atitle><jtitle>The Journal of steroid biochemistry and molecular biology</jtitle><addtitle>J Steroid Biochem Mol Biol</addtitle><date>2018-01</date><risdate>2018</risdate><volume>175</volume><spage>136</spage><epage>137</epage><pages>136-137</pages><issn>0960-0760</issn><eissn>1879-1220</eissn><abstract>•The future of analytical measurement of vitamin D will depend on separation steps.•Effort to Standardization vitamin D assay.•Guidelines for testing of Vitamin D stated that no practical reason for most people to get a vitamin D test. Vitamin D status is usually assessed by measuring the serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D (25(OH)D) concentration. There has been a dramatic increase in 25-OHD requests over recent years prompting many laboratories to consider the use of automated immunoassays. In this presentation, we will discuss and compare the two major techniques that are used for measuring of vitamin D (the binding assay and chemical assay techniques). Chemiluminescence immunoassays (CLIA), radioimmunoassy (RIA), and binding protein assay are belonging to the binding assay, while the chemical assay includes high performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) and liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (LC–MS/MS). Significant differences in the 25(OH)D determination were observed between various assays. Standardization and harmonization of 25(OH)D measurements are therefore urgently needed. The widespread introduction of well standardized assays in clinical laboratories is the challenge in the next years.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><pmid>28242262</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.jsbmb.2017.02.011</doi><tpages>2</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0960-0760
ispartof The Journal of steroid biochemistry and molecular biology, 2018-01, Vol.175, p.136-137
issn 0960-0760
1879-1220
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1872884215
source MEDLINE; Access via ScienceDirect (Elsevier)
subjects 25-Hydroxyvitamin D 2 - blood
Calcifediol - blood
Chromatography, Liquid - methods
Chromatography, Liquid - standards
CLIA
Competitive-protein binding assay
HPLC
Humans
Immunoassay - standards
RIA
Tandem Mass Spectrometry - methods
Tandem Mass Spectrometry - standards
Vitamin D
title Vitamin D assays in clinical laboratory: Past, present and future challenges
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-22T05%3A23%3A03IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Vitamin%20D%20assays%20in%20clinical%20laboratory:%20Past,%20present%20and%20future%20challenges&rft.jtitle=The%20Journal%20of%20steroid%20biochemistry%20and%20molecular%20biology&rft.au=Atef,%20Shereen%20H.&rft.date=2018-01&rft.volume=175&rft.spage=136&rft.epage=137&rft.pages=136-137&rft.issn=0960-0760&rft.eissn=1879-1220&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.jsbmb.2017.02.011&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1872884215%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1872884215&rft_id=info:pmid/28242262&rft_els_id=S0960076017300468&rfr_iscdi=true