5‐Hydroxymethylcytosine is a nuclear biomarker to assess biological potential in histologically ambiguous heavily pigmented melanocytic neoplasms

Background 5‐Hydroxymethylcytosine (5‐hmC) is an epigenetic marker detectable through immunohistochemistry (IHC) that has been shown to distinguish benign nevi from melanoma with high sensitivity and specificity. The purpose of the study was to explore its diagnostic utility in a subset of histologi...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of cutaneous pathology 2017-03, Vol.44 (3), p.249-255
Hauptverfasser: Lee, Jonathan J., Vilain, Ricardo E., Granter, Scott R., Hu, Nina R., Bresler, Scott C., Xu, Shuyun, Frank, Alexander H., Mihm, Martin C., Saw, Robyn P.M., Fletcher, Christopher D., Scolyer, Richard A., Murphy, George F., Lian, Christine G.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Background 5‐Hydroxymethylcytosine (5‐hmC) is an epigenetic marker detectable through immunohistochemistry (IHC) that has been shown to distinguish benign nevi from melanoma with high sensitivity and specificity. The purpose of the study was to explore its diagnostic utility in a subset of histologically challenging, heavily pigmented cutaneous melanocytic neoplasms. Methods 5‐hmC IHC was performed on 54 heavily pigmented melanocytic tumors. Semi‐quantitative analysis of immunoreactivity was correlated with clinical, pathologic and follow‐up data. Results Benign melanocytic neoplasms (4 of 4 blue nevi with epithelioid change; 12 of 12 combined nevi; 5 of 5 deep penetrating nevi, DPN) exhibited strong 5‐hmC nuclear reactivity. Eight heavily pigmented blue nevus‐like melanomas and 7 of 8 pigmented epithelioid melanocytomas (PEM) showed significant 5‐hmC loss. Five of 7 atypical DPN cases and 8 of 10 melanocytic tumors of uncertain malignant potential (MELTUMP) showed low to intermediate 5‐hmC immunoreactivity. These differences were statistically significant (P‐value
ISSN:0303-6987
1600-0560
DOI:10.1111/cup.12880