Impact of Side Branch Modeling on Computation of Endothelial Shear Stress in Coronary Artery Disease: Coronary Tree Reconstruction by Fusion of 3D Angiography and OCT

Computational fluid dynamics allow virtual evaluation of coronary physiology and shear stress (SS). Most studies hitherto assumed the vessel as a single conduit without accounting for the flow through side branches. This study sought to develop a new approach to reconstruct coronary geometry that al...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of the American College of Cardiology 2015-07, Vol.66 (2), p.125-135
Hauptverfasser: Li, Yingguang, Gutiérrez-Chico, Juan Luis, Holm, Niels R, Yang, Wenjie, Hebsgaard, Lasse, Christiansen, Evald H, Mæng, Michael, Lassen, Jens F, Yan, Fuhua, Reiber, Johan H C, Tu, Shengxian
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Computational fluid dynamics allow virtual evaluation of coronary physiology and shear stress (SS). Most studies hitherto assumed the vessel as a single conduit without accounting for the flow through side branches. This study sought to develop a new approach to reconstruct coronary geometry that also computes outgoing flow through side branches in hemodynamic and biomechanical calculations, using fusion of optical coherence tomography (OCT) and 3-dimensional (3D) angiography. Twenty-one patients enrolled in the DOCTOR (Does Optical Coherence Tomography Optimize Revascularization) fusion study underwent OCT and 3D-angiography of the target vessel (9 left anterior descending, 2 left circumflex, 10 right coronary artery). Coronary 3D reconstruction was performed by fusion of OCT and angiography, creating a true anatomical tree model (TM) including the side branches, and a traditional single-conduit model (SCM) disregarding the side branches. The distal coronary pressure to aortic pressure (Pd/Pa) ratio was significantly higher in TMs than in SCMs (0.904 vs. 0.842; p < 0.0001). Agreement between TM and SCM in identifying patients with a Pd/Pa ratio ≤0.80 under basal flow conditions was only k = 0.417 (p = 0.019). Average SS was 4.64 Pascal lower in TMs than in SCMs (p 
ISSN:0735-1097
1558-3597
DOI:10.1016/j.jacc.2015.05.008