Effectiveness and utility of acoustic recordings for surveying tropical birds

Although acoustic recordings have recently gained popularity as an alternative to point counts for surveying birds, little is known about the relative performance of the two methods for detecting tropical bird species across multiple vegetation types. During June and July 2008, we collected species...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of field ornithology 2012-06, Vol.83 (2), p.166-179
Hauptverfasser: Celis-Murillo, Antonio, Deppe, Jill L., Ward, Michael P.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 179
container_issue 2
container_start_page 166
container_title Journal of field ornithology
container_volume 83
creator Celis-Murillo, Antonio
Deppe, Jill L.
Ward, Michael P.
description Although acoustic recordings have recently gained popularity as an alternative to point counts for surveying birds, little is known about the relative performance of the two methods for detecting tropical bird species across multiple vegetation types. During June and July 2008, we collected species detection/nondetection data to compare the performance of a quadraphonic acoustic recording system and point counts for estimating species richness and composition and detection probabilities of 15 rare, moderately common, and common tropical bird species across six structurally distinct vegetation types (coastal dune scrub, mangrove, low-stature deciduous thorn forest, early and late successional medium-stature semievergreen forest, and grazed pastures) in the northern Yucatan Peninsula. We selected five rare species endemic to the Yucatan Peninsula and 10 moderately common and common species that also occur in other tropical regions. Species richness and composition did not differ between survey methods in any of the vegetation types. At the population level, however, we found support for an effect of method on detection probability for most species. For 13 species, regardless of their abundance, acoustic recordings yielded detection probabilities as high as or higher than those for point counts across all vegetation types. The remaining two species were better detected by point counts in pastures and coastal scrub, where greater visibility likely improved sightings of these species. However, these species were detected as well as or better by acoustic recordings in forests and mangroves where detections were primarily auditory. In tropical regions where experienced field observers may not be available and funding for field surveys may be limited, acoustic recordings offer a practical solution for determining species richness and composition and the occupancy patterns of most species. However, for some species, a combination of methods will provide the most reliable data. Regardless of the method selected, analyses that account for variation in detection probability among vegetation types will be necessary because most species in our study demonstrated vegetation-dependent detection probabilities. El uso de grabaciones acústicas recientemente ha ganado popularidad como una alternativa a los conteos por punto para el muestreo de aves. Sin embargo, poco se sabe sobre el desempeño de ambos métodos en la detección de especies de aves tropicales en múltiples tipos
doi_str_mv 10.1111/j.1557-9263.2012.00366.x
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>jstor_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1872833533</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>23256481</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>23256481</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4566-5e7d9e1ecddbaf71a3cf2b0070f7742eb8059e08b123573d77c49589a4bf8f7f3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkMlOwzAURS0EEmX4BCQv2SR4iGNnwQJVpWXshkFiYznOM3IJTbHT0v49KUFd441t3Xueng5CmJKUdudillIhZFKwnKeMUJYSwvM8Xe-hwS7YRwPCJE-UkOQQHcU4I4TmjLIBehg5B7b1K5hDjNjMK7xsfe3bDW4cNrZZxtZbHMA2ofLz94hdE3BchhVsui9uQ7Pw1tS49KGKJ-jAmTrC6d99jJ6vR0_DSXI_Hd8Mr-4Tm4k8TwTIqgAKtqpK4yQ13DpWEiKJkzJjUCoiCiCqpIwLySspbVYIVZisdMpJx4_ReT93EZqvJcRWf_pooa7NHLqNNVWSKc4F511V9VUbmhgDOL0I_tOEjaZEbw3qmd6K0ltRemtQ_xrU6w697NFvX8Pm35y-nV5Pu1fHn_X8LLZN2PGMM5FninZ50uc-trDe5SZ86FxyKfTr41jfvRTZWzG51YT_ACuPkPo</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1872833533</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Effectiveness and utility of acoustic recordings for surveying tropical birds</title><source>Wiley Online Library - AutoHoldings Journals</source><source>Jstor Complete Legacy</source><creator>Celis-Murillo, Antonio ; Deppe, Jill L. ; Ward, Michael P.</creator><creatorcontrib>Celis-Murillo, Antonio ; Deppe, Jill L. ; Ward, Michael P.</creatorcontrib><description>Although acoustic recordings have recently gained popularity as an alternative to point counts for surveying birds, little is known about the relative performance of the two methods for detecting tropical bird species across multiple vegetation types. During June and July 2008, we collected species detection/nondetection data to compare the performance of a quadraphonic acoustic recording system and point counts for estimating species richness and composition and detection probabilities of 15 rare, moderately common, and common tropical bird species across six structurally distinct vegetation types (coastal dune scrub, mangrove, low-stature deciduous thorn forest, early and late successional medium-stature semievergreen forest, and grazed pastures) in the northern Yucatan Peninsula. We selected five rare species endemic to the Yucatan Peninsula and 10 moderately common and common species that also occur in other tropical regions. Species richness and composition did not differ between survey methods in any of the vegetation types. At the population level, however, we found support for an effect of method on detection probability for most species. For 13 species, regardless of their abundance, acoustic recordings yielded detection probabilities as high as or higher than those for point counts across all vegetation types. The remaining two species were better detected by point counts in pastures and coastal scrub, where greater visibility likely improved sightings of these species. However, these species were detected as well as or better by acoustic recordings in forests and mangroves where detections were primarily auditory. In tropical regions where experienced field observers may not be available and funding for field surveys may be limited, acoustic recordings offer a practical solution for determining species richness and composition and the occupancy patterns of most species. However, for some species, a combination of methods will provide the most reliable data. Regardless of the method selected, analyses that account for variation in detection probability among vegetation types will be necessary because most species in our study demonstrated vegetation-dependent detection probabilities. El uso de grabaciones acústicas recientemente ha ganado popularidad como una alternativa a los conteos por punto para el muestreo de aves. Sin embargo, poco se sabe sobre el desempeño de ambos métodos en la detección de especies de aves tropicales en múltiples tipos de vegetación. En Junio y Julio del 2008, se colectaron datos de detección/no-detección para comparar el desempeño de un sistema portátil de grabación cuadrafónico y los conteos por punto en la estimación de riqueza de especies, composición y probabilidades de detección de 15 especies tropicales raras, moderadamente comunes y comunes a través de seis diferentes tipos de vegetación tropicales (duna costera, manglar, selva baja caducifolia espinosa, selva mediana subcaducifolia primaria y secundaria y pastizales) en el norte de la Península de Yucatán, México. De las 15 especies seleccionadas para estimar probabilidades de detección, las 5 especies raras son endémicas de la Península de Yucatán y las 10 especies moderadamente comunes y comunes, se distribuyen en otras regiones tropicales. Las estimaciones de la riqueza de especies no fueron significativamente diferentes entre ambos métodos y entre cualquiera de los tipos de vegetación. A nivel poblacional, encontramos efectos de metodología en la probabilidad de detección para la mayoría de las especies. Para 13 especies, independientemente de su estatus de abundancia, el método de grabaciones acústicas resultó en altas o mayores probabilidades de detección que los puntos de conteo en todos los tipos de vegetación. Las otras dos especies fueron mejor detectadas en conteos por puntos en pastizales y en dunas costeras, donde la visibilidad posiblemente mejoró su detección. Sin embargo, estas especies, se detectaron tan bien o mejor por las grabaciones acústicas en selvas y manglares, donde las detecciones fueron primeramente auditivas. En regiones tropicales donde existe limitación de observadores de campo bien capacitados y financiamiento para estudios de campo, las grabaciones acústicas ofrecen una solución practica para describir la riqueza de especies, composición y patrones de ocupación para la mayoría de las especies. Sin embargo, paras algunas especies, la combinación de métodos ofrecerá datos más confiables. Independientemente del método seleccionado, serán necesarios análisis que tomen en cuenta la variación en la probabilidad de detección entre tipos de vegetación ya que la mayoría de las especies demostraron probabilidades de detección dependientes de la vegetación.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0273-8570</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1557-9263</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/j.1557-9263.2012.00366.x</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Malden, USA: Blackwell Publishing Inc</publisher><subject>acoustic monitoring ; acoustic recording systems ; Birds ; Coastal forests ; Deciduous forests ; detection probability ; Estimation methods ; Forest succession ; Mangrove forests ; multimethod model ; Ornithological Methods ; Pastures ; point counts ; Species ; Survey methods ; tropical birds ; Vegetation ; Yucatan Peninsula</subject><ispartof>Journal of field ornithology, 2012-06, Vol.83 (2), p.166-179</ispartof><rights>Copyright © 2012 Association of Field Ornithologists</rights><rights>2012 The Authors. Journal of Field Ornithology ©2012 Association of Field Ornithologists</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4566-5e7d9e1ecddbaf71a3cf2b0070f7742eb8059e08b123573d77c49589a4bf8f7f3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4566-5e7d9e1ecddbaf71a3cf2b0070f7742eb8059e08b123573d77c49589a4bf8f7f3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/23256481$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/23256481$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,803,1417,27924,27925,58017,58250</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Celis-Murillo, Antonio</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Deppe, Jill L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ward, Michael P.</creatorcontrib><title>Effectiveness and utility of acoustic recordings for surveying tropical birds</title><title>Journal of field ornithology</title><description>Although acoustic recordings have recently gained popularity as an alternative to point counts for surveying birds, little is known about the relative performance of the two methods for detecting tropical bird species across multiple vegetation types. During June and July 2008, we collected species detection/nondetection data to compare the performance of a quadraphonic acoustic recording system and point counts for estimating species richness and composition and detection probabilities of 15 rare, moderately common, and common tropical bird species across six structurally distinct vegetation types (coastal dune scrub, mangrove, low-stature deciduous thorn forest, early and late successional medium-stature semievergreen forest, and grazed pastures) in the northern Yucatan Peninsula. We selected five rare species endemic to the Yucatan Peninsula and 10 moderately common and common species that also occur in other tropical regions. Species richness and composition did not differ between survey methods in any of the vegetation types. At the population level, however, we found support for an effect of method on detection probability for most species. For 13 species, regardless of their abundance, acoustic recordings yielded detection probabilities as high as or higher than those for point counts across all vegetation types. The remaining two species were better detected by point counts in pastures and coastal scrub, where greater visibility likely improved sightings of these species. However, these species were detected as well as or better by acoustic recordings in forests and mangroves where detections were primarily auditory. In tropical regions where experienced field observers may not be available and funding for field surveys may be limited, acoustic recordings offer a practical solution for determining species richness and composition and the occupancy patterns of most species. However, for some species, a combination of methods will provide the most reliable data. Regardless of the method selected, analyses that account for variation in detection probability among vegetation types will be necessary because most species in our study demonstrated vegetation-dependent detection probabilities. El uso de grabaciones acústicas recientemente ha ganado popularidad como una alternativa a los conteos por punto para el muestreo de aves. Sin embargo, poco se sabe sobre el desempeño de ambos métodos en la detección de especies de aves tropicales en múltiples tipos de vegetación. En Junio y Julio del 2008, se colectaron datos de detección/no-detección para comparar el desempeño de un sistema portátil de grabación cuadrafónico y los conteos por punto en la estimación de riqueza de especies, composición y probabilidades de detección de 15 especies tropicales raras, moderadamente comunes y comunes a través de seis diferentes tipos de vegetación tropicales (duna costera, manglar, selva baja caducifolia espinosa, selva mediana subcaducifolia primaria y secundaria y pastizales) en el norte de la Península de Yucatán, México. De las 15 especies seleccionadas para estimar probabilidades de detección, las 5 especies raras son endémicas de la Península de Yucatán y las 10 especies moderadamente comunes y comunes, se distribuyen en otras regiones tropicales. Las estimaciones de la riqueza de especies no fueron significativamente diferentes entre ambos métodos y entre cualquiera de los tipos de vegetación. A nivel poblacional, encontramos efectos de metodología en la probabilidad de detección para la mayoría de las especies. Para 13 especies, independientemente de su estatus de abundancia, el método de grabaciones acústicas resultó en altas o mayores probabilidades de detección que los puntos de conteo en todos los tipos de vegetación. Las otras dos especies fueron mejor detectadas en conteos por puntos en pastizales y en dunas costeras, donde la visibilidad posiblemente mejoró su detección. Sin embargo, estas especies, se detectaron tan bien o mejor por las grabaciones acústicas en selvas y manglares, donde las detecciones fueron primeramente auditivas. En regiones tropicales donde existe limitación de observadores de campo bien capacitados y financiamiento para estudios de campo, las grabaciones acústicas ofrecen una solución practica para describir la riqueza de especies, composición y patrones de ocupación para la mayoría de las especies. Sin embargo, paras algunas especies, la combinación de métodos ofrecerá datos más confiables. Independientemente del método seleccionado, serán necesarios análisis que tomen en cuenta la variación en la probabilidad de detección entre tipos de vegetación ya que la mayoría de las especies demostraron probabilidades de detección dependientes de la vegetación.</description><subject>acoustic monitoring</subject><subject>acoustic recording systems</subject><subject>Birds</subject><subject>Coastal forests</subject><subject>Deciduous forests</subject><subject>detection probability</subject><subject>Estimation methods</subject><subject>Forest succession</subject><subject>Mangrove forests</subject><subject>multimethod model</subject><subject>Ornithological Methods</subject><subject>Pastures</subject><subject>point counts</subject><subject>Species</subject><subject>Survey methods</subject><subject>tropical birds</subject><subject>Vegetation</subject><subject>Yucatan Peninsula</subject><issn>0273-8570</issn><issn>1557-9263</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2012</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqNkMlOwzAURS0EEmX4BCQv2SR4iGNnwQJVpWXshkFiYznOM3IJTbHT0v49KUFd441t3Xueng5CmJKUdudillIhZFKwnKeMUJYSwvM8Xe-hwS7YRwPCJE-UkOQQHcU4I4TmjLIBehg5B7b1K5hDjNjMK7xsfe3bDW4cNrZZxtZbHMA2ofLz94hdE3BchhVsui9uQ7Pw1tS49KGKJ-jAmTrC6d99jJ6vR0_DSXI_Hd8Mr-4Tm4k8TwTIqgAKtqpK4yQ13DpWEiKJkzJjUCoiCiCqpIwLySspbVYIVZisdMpJx4_ReT93EZqvJcRWf_pooa7NHLqNNVWSKc4F511V9VUbmhgDOL0I_tOEjaZEbw3qmd6K0ltRemtQ_xrU6w697NFvX8Pm35y-nV5Pu1fHn_X8LLZN2PGMM5FninZ50uc-trDe5SZ86FxyKfTr41jfvRTZWzG51YT_ACuPkPo</recordid><startdate>201206</startdate><enddate>201206</enddate><creator>Celis-Murillo, Antonio</creator><creator>Deppe, Jill L.</creator><creator>Ward, Michael P.</creator><general>Blackwell Publishing Inc</general><general>Wiley Subscription Services</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>H95</scope><scope>L.G</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201206</creationdate><title>Effectiveness and utility of acoustic recordings for surveying tropical birds</title><author>Celis-Murillo, Antonio ; Deppe, Jill L. ; Ward, Michael P.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4566-5e7d9e1ecddbaf71a3cf2b0070f7742eb8059e08b123573d77c49589a4bf8f7f3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2012</creationdate><topic>acoustic monitoring</topic><topic>acoustic recording systems</topic><topic>Birds</topic><topic>Coastal forests</topic><topic>Deciduous forests</topic><topic>detection probability</topic><topic>Estimation methods</topic><topic>Forest succession</topic><topic>Mangrove forests</topic><topic>multimethod model</topic><topic>Ornithological Methods</topic><topic>Pastures</topic><topic>point counts</topic><topic>Species</topic><topic>Survey methods</topic><topic>tropical birds</topic><topic>Vegetation</topic><topic>Yucatan Peninsula</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Celis-Murillo, Antonio</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Deppe, Jill L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ward, Michael P.</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 1: Biological Sciences &amp; Living Resources</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><jtitle>Journal of field ornithology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Celis-Murillo, Antonio</au><au>Deppe, Jill L.</au><au>Ward, Michael P.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Effectiveness and utility of acoustic recordings for surveying tropical birds</atitle><jtitle>Journal of field ornithology</jtitle><date>2012-06</date><risdate>2012</risdate><volume>83</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>166</spage><epage>179</epage><pages>166-179</pages><issn>0273-8570</issn><eissn>1557-9263</eissn><abstract>Although acoustic recordings have recently gained popularity as an alternative to point counts for surveying birds, little is known about the relative performance of the two methods for detecting tropical bird species across multiple vegetation types. During June and July 2008, we collected species detection/nondetection data to compare the performance of a quadraphonic acoustic recording system and point counts for estimating species richness and composition and detection probabilities of 15 rare, moderately common, and common tropical bird species across six structurally distinct vegetation types (coastal dune scrub, mangrove, low-stature deciduous thorn forest, early and late successional medium-stature semievergreen forest, and grazed pastures) in the northern Yucatan Peninsula. We selected five rare species endemic to the Yucatan Peninsula and 10 moderately common and common species that also occur in other tropical regions. Species richness and composition did not differ between survey methods in any of the vegetation types. At the population level, however, we found support for an effect of method on detection probability for most species. For 13 species, regardless of their abundance, acoustic recordings yielded detection probabilities as high as or higher than those for point counts across all vegetation types. The remaining two species were better detected by point counts in pastures and coastal scrub, where greater visibility likely improved sightings of these species. However, these species were detected as well as or better by acoustic recordings in forests and mangroves where detections were primarily auditory. In tropical regions where experienced field observers may not be available and funding for field surveys may be limited, acoustic recordings offer a practical solution for determining species richness and composition and the occupancy patterns of most species. However, for some species, a combination of methods will provide the most reliable data. Regardless of the method selected, analyses that account for variation in detection probability among vegetation types will be necessary because most species in our study demonstrated vegetation-dependent detection probabilities. El uso de grabaciones acústicas recientemente ha ganado popularidad como una alternativa a los conteos por punto para el muestreo de aves. Sin embargo, poco se sabe sobre el desempeño de ambos métodos en la detección de especies de aves tropicales en múltiples tipos de vegetación. En Junio y Julio del 2008, se colectaron datos de detección/no-detección para comparar el desempeño de un sistema portátil de grabación cuadrafónico y los conteos por punto en la estimación de riqueza de especies, composición y probabilidades de detección de 15 especies tropicales raras, moderadamente comunes y comunes a través de seis diferentes tipos de vegetación tropicales (duna costera, manglar, selva baja caducifolia espinosa, selva mediana subcaducifolia primaria y secundaria y pastizales) en el norte de la Península de Yucatán, México. De las 15 especies seleccionadas para estimar probabilidades de detección, las 5 especies raras son endémicas de la Península de Yucatán y las 10 especies moderadamente comunes y comunes, se distribuyen en otras regiones tropicales. Las estimaciones de la riqueza de especies no fueron significativamente diferentes entre ambos métodos y entre cualquiera de los tipos de vegetación. A nivel poblacional, encontramos efectos de metodología en la probabilidad de detección para la mayoría de las especies. Para 13 especies, independientemente de su estatus de abundancia, el método de grabaciones acústicas resultó en altas o mayores probabilidades de detección que los puntos de conteo en todos los tipos de vegetación. Las otras dos especies fueron mejor detectadas en conteos por puntos en pastizales y en dunas costeras, donde la visibilidad posiblemente mejoró su detección. Sin embargo, estas especies, se detectaron tan bien o mejor por las grabaciones acústicas en selvas y manglares, donde las detecciones fueron primeramente auditivas. En regiones tropicales donde existe limitación de observadores de campo bien capacitados y financiamiento para estudios de campo, las grabaciones acústicas ofrecen una solución practica para describir la riqueza de especies, composición y patrones de ocupación para la mayoría de las especies. Sin embargo, paras algunas especies, la combinación de métodos ofrecerá datos más confiables. Independientemente del método seleccionado, serán necesarios análisis que tomen en cuenta la variación en la probabilidad de detección entre tipos de vegetación ya que la mayoría de las especies demostraron probabilidades de detección dependientes de la vegetación.</abstract><cop>Malden, USA</cop><pub>Blackwell Publishing Inc</pub><doi>10.1111/j.1557-9263.2012.00366.x</doi><tpages>14</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0273-8570
ispartof Journal of field ornithology, 2012-06, Vol.83 (2), p.166-179
issn 0273-8570
1557-9263
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1872833533
source Wiley Online Library - AutoHoldings Journals; Jstor Complete Legacy
subjects acoustic monitoring
acoustic recording systems
Birds
Coastal forests
Deciduous forests
detection probability
Estimation methods
Forest succession
Mangrove forests
multimethod model
Ornithological Methods
Pastures
point counts
Species
Survey methods
tropical birds
Vegetation
Yucatan Peninsula
title Effectiveness and utility of acoustic recordings for surveying tropical birds
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-03T09%3A58%3A26IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Effectiveness%20and%20utility%20of%20acoustic%20recordings%20for%20surveying%20tropical%20birds&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20field%20ornithology&rft.au=Celis-Murillo,%20Antonio&rft.date=2012-06&rft.volume=83&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=166&rft.epage=179&rft.pages=166-179&rft.issn=0273-8570&rft.eissn=1557-9263&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/j.1557-9263.2012.00366.x&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_proqu%3E23256481%3C/jstor_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1872833533&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_jstor_id=23256481&rfr_iscdi=true