Re‐evaluation of glomerulitis using occlusion criteria based on the Banff 2013 revision: a retrospective study
Summary The presence of occlusion/near‐occlusion of glomerular capillaries was recently added to the existing definition of glomerulitis (g). We retrospectively re‐evaluated 135 renal allograft biopsies regarding g to ensure no antibody‐damaged grafts were missed. Previous and revised g scores (pg a...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Transplant international 2017-06, Vol.30 (6), p.579-588 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | Summary
The presence of occlusion/near‐occlusion of glomerular capillaries was recently added to the existing definition of glomerulitis (g). We retrospectively re‐evaluated 135 renal allograft biopsies regarding g to ensure no antibody‐damaged grafts were missed. Previous and revised g scores (pg and rg, respectively) were compared for clinicopathologic correlations. The g score did not change in 100 (74.1%) biopsies. Thirty‐five (25.9%) biopsies were changed to a lower score. Sensitivity and specificity of pg and rg for the presence of donor‐specific antibodies (DSA) were 76% vs. 58% and 70% vs. 79%, respectively. Pg score indicated graft loss with 65% sensitivity and 63% specificity, whereas rg showed 46% sensitivity and 71% specificity. Area under the curve (AUC) values in ROC analysis for DSA and graft loss were as follows: pg, 0.773; rg, 0.693; and pg, 0.635; rg, 0.577, respectively. A comparison of the two AUC values revealed a significant difference between pg and rg only for DSA (P = 0.0076). Pg and post‐transplant time of biopsy independently predicted graft loss, whereas rg did not. In conclusion, revised g scores showed lesser sensitivity but higher specificity for DSA and graft loss. Recent definition of g missed antibody‐mediated rejection in few cases, and it was not an independent predictor for graft loss. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0934-0874 1432-2277 |
DOI: | 10.1111/tri.12943 |