Robotic systems for gait re-education in cases of spinal cord injury: a systematic review

The evidence underlying robotic body weight supported treadmill training in patients with spinal cord injury remains poorly characterized. To perform a qualitative systematic review on the efficacy of this therapy. A search on PubMed, CINAHL, Cochrane Library and PEDro was performed from January 200...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Revista de neurologiá 2017-03, Vol.64 (5), p.205-213
Hauptverfasser: Gandara-Sambade, T, Fernandez-Pereira, M, Rodriguez-Sotillo, A
Format: Artikel
Sprache:spa
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 213
container_issue 5
container_start_page 205
container_title Revista de neurologiá
container_volume 64
creator Gandara-Sambade, T
Fernandez-Pereira, M
Rodriguez-Sotillo, A
description The evidence underlying robotic body weight supported treadmill training in patients with spinal cord injury remains poorly characterized. To perform a qualitative systematic review on the efficacy of this therapy. A search on PubMed, CINAHL, Cochrane Library and PEDro was performed from January 2005 to April 2016. The references in these articles were also reviewed to find papers not identified with the initial search strategy. The methodological level of the articles was evaluated with PEDro and Downs and Black scales. A total of 129 potentially interesting articles were found, of which 10 fulfilled the inclusion criteria. Those studies included 286 patients, who were predominantly young and male. Most of them had an incomplete spinal cord injury and were classified as C or D in ASIA scale. Robotic devices employed in these studies were Lokomat, Gait Trainer and LOPES. Improvement in walking parameters evaluated was more evident in young patients, those with subacute spinal cord injury, and those with high ASIA or LEMS scores. Conversely, factors such as etiology, level of injury or sex were less predictive of improvement. The methodological level of these studies was fair according to PEDro and Downs and Black scales. The evidence of gait training with robotic devices in patients with spinal cord injury is positive, although limited and with fair methodological quality.
doi_str_mv 10.33588/rn.6405.2016200
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1871555008</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1871555008</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-p141t-a7cbe57e29ca727fae4433de1dee5c9773d09d4af95742d9fbd5c57718fca8a73</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNo1kEtLxDAUhYMgzji6dyVZuumYZ5O6k8EXDAiiC1flNrmVDJ2mJq0y_94Rx9WBw3e-xSHkgrOllNra69QvS8X0UjBeCsaOyJxrUxalNnZGTnPeMKakqtgJmQkrRKUUn5P3l9jEMTiad3nEbaZtTPQDwkgTFugnB2OIPQ09dZAx09jSPIQeOupi8vt-M6XdDYXDHn5VCb8Cfp-R4xa6jOeHXJC3-7vX1WOxfn54Wt2ui4ErPhZgXIPaoKgcGGFaQKWk9Mg9onaVMdKzyitoK22U8FXbeO20Mdy2DiwYuSBXf94hxc8J81hvQ3bYddBjnHLNreFaa8bsHr08oFOzRV8PKWwh7er_O-QPSUlhig</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1871555008</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Robotic systems for gait re-education in cases of spinal cord injury: a systematic review</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><creator>Gandara-Sambade, T ; Fernandez-Pereira, M ; Rodriguez-Sotillo, A</creator><creatorcontrib>Gandara-Sambade, T ; Fernandez-Pereira, M ; Rodriguez-Sotillo, A</creatorcontrib><description>The evidence underlying robotic body weight supported treadmill training in patients with spinal cord injury remains poorly characterized. To perform a qualitative systematic review on the efficacy of this therapy. A search on PubMed, CINAHL, Cochrane Library and PEDro was performed from January 2005 to April 2016. The references in these articles were also reviewed to find papers not identified with the initial search strategy. The methodological level of the articles was evaluated with PEDro and Downs and Black scales. A total of 129 potentially interesting articles were found, of which 10 fulfilled the inclusion criteria. Those studies included 286 patients, who were predominantly young and male. Most of them had an incomplete spinal cord injury and were classified as C or D in ASIA scale. Robotic devices employed in these studies were Lokomat, Gait Trainer and LOPES. Improvement in walking parameters evaluated was more evident in young patients, those with subacute spinal cord injury, and those with high ASIA or LEMS scores. Conversely, factors such as etiology, level of injury or sex were less predictive of improvement. The methodological level of these studies was fair according to PEDro and Downs and Black scales. The evidence of gait training with robotic devices in patients with spinal cord injury is positive, although limited and with fair methodological quality.</description><identifier>EISSN: 1576-6578</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.33588/rn.6405.2016200</identifier><identifier>PMID: 28229441</identifier><language>spa</language><publisher>Spain</publisher><subject>Adult ; Exercise Therapy - instrumentation ; Exoskeleton Device ; Female ; Gait Disorders, Neurologic - rehabilitation ; Humans ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Recovery of Function ; Robotics - instrumentation ; Spinal Cord Injuries - complications ; Walking</subject><ispartof>Revista de neurologiá, 2017-03, Vol.64 (5), p.205-213</ispartof><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>315,781,785,27925,27926</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28229441$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Gandara-Sambade, T</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fernandez-Pereira, M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rodriguez-Sotillo, A</creatorcontrib><title>Robotic systems for gait re-education in cases of spinal cord injury: a systematic review</title><title>Revista de neurologiá</title><addtitle>Rev Neurol</addtitle><description>The evidence underlying robotic body weight supported treadmill training in patients with spinal cord injury remains poorly characterized. To perform a qualitative systematic review on the efficacy of this therapy. A search on PubMed, CINAHL, Cochrane Library and PEDro was performed from January 2005 to April 2016. The references in these articles were also reviewed to find papers not identified with the initial search strategy. The methodological level of the articles was evaluated with PEDro and Downs and Black scales. A total of 129 potentially interesting articles were found, of which 10 fulfilled the inclusion criteria. Those studies included 286 patients, who were predominantly young and male. Most of them had an incomplete spinal cord injury and were classified as C or D in ASIA scale. Robotic devices employed in these studies were Lokomat, Gait Trainer and LOPES. Improvement in walking parameters evaluated was more evident in young patients, those with subacute spinal cord injury, and those with high ASIA or LEMS scores. Conversely, factors such as etiology, level of injury or sex were less predictive of improvement. The methodological level of these studies was fair according to PEDro and Downs and Black scales. The evidence of gait training with robotic devices in patients with spinal cord injury is positive, although limited and with fair methodological quality.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Exercise Therapy - instrumentation</subject><subject>Exoskeleton Device</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Gait Disorders, Neurologic - rehabilitation</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Recovery of Function</subject><subject>Robotics - instrumentation</subject><subject>Spinal Cord Injuries - complications</subject><subject>Walking</subject><issn>1576-6578</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2017</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNo1kEtLxDAUhYMgzji6dyVZuumYZ5O6k8EXDAiiC1flNrmVDJ2mJq0y_94Rx9WBw3e-xSHkgrOllNra69QvS8X0UjBeCsaOyJxrUxalNnZGTnPeMKakqtgJmQkrRKUUn5P3l9jEMTiad3nEbaZtTPQDwkgTFugnB2OIPQ09dZAx09jSPIQeOupi8vt-M6XdDYXDHn5VCb8Cfp-R4xa6jOeHXJC3-7vX1WOxfn54Wt2ui4ErPhZgXIPaoKgcGGFaQKWk9Mg9onaVMdKzyitoK22U8FXbeO20Mdy2DiwYuSBXf94hxc8J81hvQ3bYddBjnHLNreFaa8bsHr08oFOzRV8PKWwh7er_O-QPSUlhig</recordid><startdate>20170301</startdate><enddate>20170301</enddate><creator>Gandara-Sambade, T</creator><creator>Fernandez-Pereira, M</creator><creator>Rodriguez-Sotillo, A</creator><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20170301</creationdate><title>Robotic systems for gait re-education in cases of spinal cord injury: a systematic review</title><author>Gandara-Sambade, T ; Fernandez-Pereira, M ; Rodriguez-Sotillo, A</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-p141t-a7cbe57e29ca727fae4433de1dee5c9773d09d4af95742d9fbd5c57718fca8a73</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>spa</language><creationdate>2017</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Exercise Therapy - instrumentation</topic><topic>Exoskeleton Device</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Gait Disorders, Neurologic - rehabilitation</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Recovery of Function</topic><topic>Robotics - instrumentation</topic><topic>Spinal Cord Injuries - complications</topic><topic>Walking</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Gandara-Sambade, T</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fernandez-Pereira, M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rodriguez-Sotillo, A</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Revista de neurologiá</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Gandara-Sambade, T</au><au>Fernandez-Pereira, M</au><au>Rodriguez-Sotillo, A</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Robotic systems for gait re-education in cases of spinal cord injury: a systematic review</atitle><jtitle>Revista de neurologiá</jtitle><addtitle>Rev Neurol</addtitle><date>2017-03-01</date><risdate>2017</risdate><volume>64</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>205</spage><epage>213</epage><pages>205-213</pages><eissn>1576-6578</eissn><abstract>The evidence underlying robotic body weight supported treadmill training in patients with spinal cord injury remains poorly characterized. To perform a qualitative systematic review on the efficacy of this therapy. A search on PubMed, CINAHL, Cochrane Library and PEDro was performed from January 2005 to April 2016. The references in these articles were also reviewed to find papers not identified with the initial search strategy. The methodological level of the articles was evaluated with PEDro and Downs and Black scales. A total of 129 potentially interesting articles were found, of which 10 fulfilled the inclusion criteria. Those studies included 286 patients, who were predominantly young and male. Most of them had an incomplete spinal cord injury and were classified as C or D in ASIA scale. Robotic devices employed in these studies were Lokomat, Gait Trainer and LOPES. Improvement in walking parameters evaluated was more evident in young patients, those with subacute spinal cord injury, and those with high ASIA or LEMS scores. Conversely, factors such as etiology, level of injury or sex were less predictive of improvement. The methodological level of these studies was fair according to PEDro and Downs and Black scales. The evidence of gait training with robotic devices in patients with spinal cord injury is positive, although limited and with fair methodological quality.</abstract><cop>Spain</cop><pmid>28229441</pmid><doi>10.33588/rn.6405.2016200</doi><tpages>9</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier EISSN: 1576-6578
ispartof Revista de neurologiá, 2017-03, Vol.64 (5), p.205-213
issn 1576-6578
language spa
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1871555008
source MEDLINE; EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals
subjects Adult
Exercise Therapy - instrumentation
Exoskeleton Device
Female
Gait Disorders, Neurologic - rehabilitation
Humans
Male
Middle Aged
Recovery of Function
Robotics - instrumentation
Spinal Cord Injuries - complications
Walking
title Robotic systems for gait re-education in cases of spinal cord injury: a systematic review
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-18T13%3A22%3A58IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Robotic%20systems%20for%20gait%20re-education%20in%20cases%20of%20spinal%20cord%20injury:%20a%20systematic%20review&rft.jtitle=Revista%20de%20neurologi%C3%A1&rft.au=Gandara-Sambade,%20T&rft.date=2017-03-01&rft.volume=64&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=205&rft.epage=213&rft.pages=205-213&rft.eissn=1576-6578&rft_id=info:doi/10.33588/rn.6405.2016200&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E1871555008%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1871555008&rft_id=info:pmid/28229441&rfr_iscdi=true