Neuro, trauma, or med/surg intensive care unit: Does it matter where multiple injuries patients with traumatic brain injury are admitted? Secondary analysis of the American Association for the Surgery of Trauma Multi-Institutional Trials Committee decompressive craniectomy study
Patients with nontraumatic acute intracranial pathology benefit from neurointensivist care. Similarly, trauma patients with and without traumatic brain injury (TBI) fare better when treated by a dedicated trauma team. No study has yet evaluated the role of specialized neurocritical (NICU) and trauma...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | The journal of trauma and acute care surgery 2017-03, Vol.82 (3), p.489-496 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 496 |
---|---|
container_issue | 3 |
container_start_page | 489 |
container_title | The journal of trauma and acute care surgery |
container_volume | 82 |
creator | Lombardo, Sarah Scalea, Thomas Sperry, Jason Coimbra, Raul Vercruysse, Gary Enniss, Toby Jurkovich, Gregory J Nirula, Raminder |
description | Patients with nontraumatic acute intracranial pathology benefit from neurointensivist care. Similarly, trauma patients with and without traumatic brain injury (TBI) fare better when treated by a dedicated trauma team. No study has yet evaluated the role of specialized neurocritical (NICU) and trauma intensive care units (TICU) in the management of TBI patients, and it remains unclear which TBI patients are best served in NICU, TICU, or general (Med/Surg) ICU.
This study is a secondary analysis of The American Association for the Surgery of Trauma Multi-Institutional Trials Committee (AAST-MITC) decompressive craniectomy study. Twelve Level 1 trauma centers provided clinical data and head computed tomography (CT) scans of patients with Glasgow Coma Scale score of 13 or less and CT evidence of TBI. Non-ICU admissions were excluded. Multivariate logistic regression was performed to measure the association between ICU type and survival and calculate the probability of death for increasing Injury Severity Score (ISS). Multiple injuries patients (ISS > 15) with TBI and isolated TBI patients (other Abbreviated Injury Scale score < 3) were analyzed separately.
There were 3641 patients with CT evidence of TBI with 2951 admitted to an ICU. Before adjustment, patient demographics, injury severity, and survival differed significantly by unit type. After adjustment, unit type, age, and ISS remained independent predictors of death. Unit type modified the effect of ISS on mortality. TBI multiple injuries patients admitted to a TICU had improved survival across increasing ISS. Survival for isolated TBI patients was similar between TICU and NICU. Med/surg ICU carried the greatest probability of death.
Multiple injuries patients with TBI have lower mortality risk when admitted to a trauma ICU. This survival benefit increases with increasing injury severity. Isolated TBI patients have similar mortality risk when admitted to a neuro ICU compared with a trauma ICU. Med/surg ICU admission carries the highest mortality risk.
Therapeutic study, level IV. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1097/TA.0000000000001361 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1870987666</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1870987666</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c255t-8d00b0c75b5495b970ca09ddc8f54d1bd41e6a814074cf87fdec58dc211f8bfc3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpdUktv1DAQDghEq9IzByQ0Rw5NaydxHlxQtLwqFTh0OUeOPWFdxXbwg2r_PU53qRC-2PL3Go8ny15TcklJ11xt-0vyz6JlTZ9mpwWty5w0dfns8czYSXbu_d3KYnVXMvYiOynaomCsaE6fvPqG0dkLCI5HzS_AOtAor3x0P0GZgMar3wiCO4RoVHgHHyx6UAE0DwEd3O8wQTrOQS0zJslddCoxFh4UmuDhXoXd0T0oAaPjyhxoe1hdudQqOcn3cIvCGsnXe8PnvVce7ARhh9BrdEpwA733VqhkZA1MqdQVvE2lYhIl7vYhBr6u1eTXxgcV4srlc4IUnz1srH6IQ5ApTS8O_eGBjhuFIli9Bx-i3L_Mnk9JgOfH_Sz78enjdvMlv_n--XrT3-QiNTDkrSRkJKJhI6s6NnYNEZx0Uop2YpWko6wo1rylFWkqMbXNlGJZK0VB6dSOkyjPsrcH38XZXxF9GLTyAueZG7TRD7RtSNc2dV0nanmgCme9dzgNi1M69WugZFiHYtj2w_9DkVRvjgFxTD_7qPk7AuUfuK66Ng</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1870987666</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Neuro, trauma, or med/surg intensive care unit: Does it matter where multiple injuries patients with traumatic brain injury are admitted? Secondary analysis of the American Association for the Surgery of Trauma Multi-Institutional Trials Committee decompressive craniectomy study</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Journals@Ovid Complete</source><creator>Lombardo, Sarah ; Scalea, Thomas ; Sperry, Jason ; Coimbra, Raul ; Vercruysse, Gary ; Enniss, Toby ; Jurkovich, Gregory J ; Nirula, Raminder</creator><creatorcontrib>Lombardo, Sarah ; Scalea, Thomas ; Sperry, Jason ; Coimbra, Raul ; Vercruysse, Gary ; Enniss, Toby ; Jurkovich, Gregory J ; Nirula, Raminder</creatorcontrib><description>Patients with nontraumatic acute intracranial pathology benefit from neurointensivist care. Similarly, trauma patients with and without traumatic brain injury (TBI) fare better when treated by a dedicated trauma team. No study has yet evaluated the role of specialized neurocritical (NICU) and trauma intensive care units (TICU) in the management of TBI patients, and it remains unclear which TBI patients are best served in NICU, TICU, or general (Med/Surg) ICU.
This study is a secondary analysis of The American Association for the Surgery of Trauma Multi-Institutional Trials Committee (AAST-MITC) decompressive craniectomy study. Twelve Level 1 trauma centers provided clinical data and head computed tomography (CT) scans of patients with Glasgow Coma Scale score of 13 or less and CT evidence of TBI. Non-ICU admissions were excluded. Multivariate logistic regression was performed to measure the association between ICU type and survival and calculate the probability of death for increasing Injury Severity Score (ISS). Multiple injuries patients (ISS > 15) with TBI and isolated TBI patients (other Abbreviated Injury Scale score < 3) were analyzed separately.
There were 3641 patients with CT evidence of TBI with 2951 admitted to an ICU. Before adjustment, patient demographics, injury severity, and survival differed significantly by unit type. After adjustment, unit type, age, and ISS remained independent predictors of death. Unit type modified the effect of ISS on mortality. TBI multiple injuries patients admitted to a TICU had improved survival across increasing ISS. Survival for isolated TBI patients was similar between TICU and NICU. Med/surg ICU carried the greatest probability of death.
Multiple injuries patients with TBI have lower mortality risk when admitted to a trauma ICU. This survival benefit increases with increasing injury severity. Isolated TBI patients have similar mortality risk when admitted to a neuro ICU compared with a trauma ICU. Med/surg ICU admission carries the highest mortality risk.
Therapeutic study, level IV.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2163-0755</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2163-0763</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1097/TA.0000000000001361</identifier><identifier>PMID: 28225527</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States</publisher><subject>Abbreviated Injury Scale ; Adolescent ; Adult ; Aged ; Brain Injuries, Traumatic - mortality ; Brain Injuries, Traumatic - surgery ; Decompressive Craniectomy ; Female ; Hospitalization ; Humans ; Injury Severity Score ; Intensive Care Units - organization & administration ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Multiple Trauma - mortality ; Multiple Trauma - therapy ; Trauma Centers - organization & administration ; United States</subject><ispartof>The journal of trauma and acute care surgery, 2017-03, Vol.82 (3), p.489-496</ispartof><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c255t-8d00b0c75b5495b970ca09ddc8f54d1bd41e6a814074cf87fdec58dc211f8bfc3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28225527$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Lombardo, Sarah</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Scalea, Thomas</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sperry, Jason</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Coimbra, Raul</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vercruysse, Gary</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Enniss, Toby</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jurkovich, Gregory J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nirula, Raminder</creatorcontrib><title>Neuro, trauma, or med/surg intensive care unit: Does it matter where multiple injuries patients with traumatic brain injury are admitted? Secondary analysis of the American Association for the Surgery of Trauma Multi-Institutional Trials Committee decompressive craniectomy study</title><title>The journal of trauma and acute care surgery</title><addtitle>J Trauma Acute Care Surg</addtitle><description>Patients with nontraumatic acute intracranial pathology benefit from neurointensivist care. Similarly, trauma patients with and without traumatic brain injury (TBI) fare better when treated by a dedicated trauma team. No study has yet evaluated the role of specialized neurocritical (NICU) and trauma intensive care units (TICU) in the management of TBI patients, and it remains unclear which TBI patients are best served in NICU, TICU, or general (Med/Surg) ICU.
This study is a secondary analysis of The American Association for the Surgery of Trauma Multi-Institutional Trials Committee (AAST-MITC) decompressive craniectomy study. Twelve Level 1 trauma centers provided clinical data and head computed tomography (CT) scans of patients with Glasgow Coma Scale score of 13 or less and CT evidence of TBI. Non-ICU admissions were excluded. Multivariate logistic regression was performed to measure the association between ICU type and survival and calculate the probability of death for increasing Injury Severity Score (ISS). Multiple injuries patients (ISS > 15) with TBI and isolated TBI patients (other Abbreviated Injury Scale score < 3) were analyzed separately.
There were 3641 patients with CT evidence of TBI with 2951 admitted to an ICU. Before adjustment, patient demographics, injury severity, and survival differed significantly by unit type. After adjustment, unit type, age, and ISS remained independent predictors of death. Unit type modified the effect of ISS on mortality. TBI multiple injuries patients admitted to a TICU had improved survival across increasing ISS. Survival for isolated TBI patients was similar between TICU and NICU. Med/surg ICU carried the greatest probability of death.
Multiple injuries patients with TBI have lower mortality risk when admitted to a trauma ICU. This survival benefit increases with increasing injury severity. Isolated TBI patients have similar mortality risk when admitted to a neuro ICU compared with a trauma ICU. Med/surg ICU admission carries the highest mortality risk.
Therapeutic study, level IV.</description><subject>Abbreviated Injury Scale</subject><subject>Adolescent</subject><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Brain Injuries, Traumatic - mortality</subject><subject>Brain Injuries, Traumatic - surgery</subject><subject>Decompressive Craniectomy</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Hospitalization</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Injury Severity Score</subject><subject>Intensive Care Units - organization & administration</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Multiple Trauma - mortality</subject><subject>Multiple Trauma - therapy</subject><subject>Trauma Centers - organization & administration</subject><subject>United States</subject><issn>2163-0755</issn><issn>2163-0763</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2017</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNpdUktv1DAQDghEq9IzByQ0Rw5NaydxHlxQtLwqFTh0OUeOPWFdxXbwg2r_PU53qRC-2PL3Go8ny15TcklJ11xt-0vyz6JlTZ9mpwWty5w0dfns8czYSXbu_d3KYnVXMvYiOynaomCsaE6fvPqG0dkLCI5HzS_AOtAor3x0P0GZgMar3wiCO4RoVHgHHyx6UAE0DwEd3O8wQTrOQS0zJslddCoxFh4UmuDhXoXd0T0oAaPjyhxoe1hdudQqOcn3cIvCGsnXe8PnvVce7ARhh9BrdEpwA733VqhkZA1MqdQVvE2lYhIl7vYhBr6u1eTXxgcV4srlc4IUnz1srH6IQ5ApTS8O_eGBjhuFIli9Bx-i3L_Mnk9JgOfH_Sz78enjdvMlv_n--XrT3-QiNTDkrSRkJKJhI6s6NnYNEZx0Uop2YpWko6wo1rylFWkqMbXNlGJZK0VB6dSOkyjPsrcH38XZXxF9GLTyAueZG7TRD7RtSNc2dV0nanmgCme9dzgNi1M69WugZFiHYtj2w_9DkVRvjgFxTD_7qPk7AuUfuK66Ng</recordid><startdate>201703</startdate><enddate>201703</enddate><creator>Lombardo, Sarah</creator><creator>Scalea, Thomas</creator><creator>Sperry, Jason</creator><creator>Coimbra, Raul</creator><creator>Vercruysse, Gary</creator><creator>Enniss, Toby</creator><creator>Jurkovich, Gregory J</creator><creator>Nirula, Raminder</creator><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201703</creationdate><title>Neuro, trauma, or med/surg intensive care unit: Does it matter where multiple injuries patients with traumatic brain injury are admitted? Secondary analysis of the American Association for the Surgery of Trauma Multi-Institutional Trials Committee decompressive craniectomy study</title><author>Lombardo, Sarah ; Scalea, Thomas ; Sperry, Jason ; Coimbra, Raul ; Vercruysse, Gary ; Enniss, Toby ; Jurkovich, Gregory J ; Nirula, Raminder</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c255t-8d00b0c75b5495b970ca09ddc8f54d1bd41e6a814074cf87fdec58dc211f8bfc3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2017</creationdate><topic>Abbreviated Injury Scale</topic><topic>Adolescent</topic><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Brain Injuries, Traumatic - mortality</topic><topic>Brain Injuries, Traumatic - surgery</topic><topic>Decompressive Craniectomy</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Hospitalization</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Injury Severity Score</topic><topic>Intensive Care Units - organization & administration</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Multiple Trauma - mortality</topic><topic>Multiple Trauma - therapy</topic><topic>Trauma Centers - organization & administration</topic><topic>United States</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Lombardo, Sarah</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Scalea, Thomas</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sperry, Jason</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Coimbra, Raul</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vercruysse, Gary</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Enniss, Toby</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jurkovich, Gregory J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nirula, Raminder</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>The journal of trauma and acute care surgery</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Lombardo, Sarah</au><au>Scalea, Thomas</au><au>Sperry, Jason</au><au>Coimbra, Raul</au><au>Vercruysse, Gary</au><au>Enniss, Toby</au><au>Jurkovich, Gregory J</au><au>Nirula, Raminder</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Neuro, trauma, or med/surg intensive care unit: Does it matter where multiple injuries patients with traumatic brain injury are admitted? Secondary analysis of the American Association for the Surgery of Trauma Multi-Institutional Trials Committee decompressive craniectomy study</atitle><jtitle>The journal of trauma and acute care surgery</jtitle><addtitle>J Trauma Acute Care Surg</addtitle><date>2017-03</date><risdate>2017</risdate><volume>82</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>489</spage><epage>496</epage><pages>489-496</pages><issn>2163-0755</issn><eissn>2163-0763</eissn><abstract>Patients with nontraumatic acute intracranial pathology benefit from neurointensivist care. Similarly, trauma patients with and without traumatic brain injury (TBI) fare better when treated by a dedicated trauma team. No study has yet evaluated the role of specialized neurocritical (NICU) and trauma intensive care units (TICU) in the management of TBI patients, and it remains unclear which TBI patients are best served in NICU, TICU, or general (Med/Surg) ICU.
This study is a secondary analysis of The American Association for the Surgery of Trauma Multi-Institutional Trials Committee (AAST-MITC) decompressive craniectomy study. Twelve Level 1 trauma centers provided clinical data and head computed tomography (CT) scans of patients with Glasgow Coma Scale score of 13 or less and CT evidence of TBI. Non-ICU admissions were excluded. Multivariate logistic regression was performed to measure the association between ICU type and survival and calculate the probability of death for increasing Injury Severity Score (ISS). Multiple injuries patients (ISS > 15) with TBI and isolated TBI patients (other Abbreviated Injury Scale score < 3) were analyzed separately.
There were 3641 patients with CT evidence of TBI with 2951 admitted to an ICU. Before adjustment, patient demographics, injury severity, and survival differed significantly by unit type. After adjustment, unit type, age, and ISS remained independent predictors of death. Unit type modified the effect of ISS on mortality. TBI multiple injuries patients admitted to a TICU had improved survival across increasing ISS. Survival for isolated TBI patients was similar between TICU and NICU. Med/surg ICU carried the greatest probability of death.
Multiple injuries patients with TBI have lower mortality risk when admitted to a trauma ICU. This survival benefit increases with increasing injury severity. Isolated TBI patients have similar mortality risk when admitted to a neuro ICU compared with a trauma ICU. Med/surg ICU admission carries the highest mortality risk.
Therapeutic study, level IV.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pmid>28225527</pmid><doi>10.1097/TA.0000000000001361</doi><tpages>8</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 2163-0755 |
ispartof | The journal of trauma and acute care surgery, 2017-03, Vol.82 (3), p.489-496 |
issn | 2163-0755 2163-0763 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1870987666 |
source | MEDLINE; Journals@Ovid Complete |
subjects | Abbreviated Injury Scale Adolescent Adult Aged Brain Injuries, Traumatic - mortality Brain Injuries, Traumatic - surgery Decompressive Craniectomy Female Hospitalization Humans Injury Severity Score Intensive Care Units - organization & administration Male Middle Aged Multiple Trauma - mortality Multiple Trauma - therapy Trauma Centers - organization & administration United States |
title | Neuro, trauma, or med/surg intensive care unit: Does it matter where multiple injuries patients with traumatic brain injury are admitted? Secondary analysis of the American Association for the Surgery of Trauma Multi-Institutional Trials Committee decompressive craniectomy study |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-20T20%3A35%3A37IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Neuro,%20trauma,%20or%20med/surg%20intensive%20care%20unit:%20Does%20it%20matter%20where%20multiple%20injuries%20patients%20with%20traumatic%20brain%20injury%20are%20admitted?%20Secondary%20analysis%20of%20the%20American%20Association%20for%20the%20Surgery%20of%20Trauma%20Multi-Institutional%20Trials%20Committee%20decompressive%20craniectomy%20study&rft.jtitle=The%20journal%20of%20trauma%20and%20acute%20care%20surgery&rft.au=Lombardo,%20Sarah&rft.date=2017-03&rft.volume=82&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=489&rft.epage=496&rft.pages=489-496&rft.issn=2163-0755&rft.eissn=2163-0763&rft_id=info:doi/10.1097/TA.0000000000001361&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1870987666%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1870987666&rft_id=info:pmid/28225527&rfr_iscdi=true |