Glaucoma and driving: Are we documenting driving status and advising patients with glaucoma appropriately about their driving?
Purpose Guidelines from the Driver and Vehicle Licensing Agency (DVLA) in the UK state that patients with bilateral glaucomatous visual field defects must stop driving unless confirmed able to meet minimum visual field requirements. Guidelines from the Royal College of Ophthalmologists state that op...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | International ophthalmology 2018-04, Vol.38 (2), p.419-423 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 423 |
---|---|
container_issue | 2 |
container_start_page | 419 |
container_title | International ophthalmology |
container_volume | 38 |
creator | Sachdev, Amun Tahhan, Mazen Sung, Velota Ching Tak |
description | Purpose
Guidelines from the Driver and Vehicle Licensing Agency (DVLA) in the UK state that patients with bilateral glaucomatous visual field defects must stop driving unless confirmed able to meet minimum visual field requirements. Guidelines from the Royal College of Ophthalmologists state that ophthalmologists must consider driving status in every consultation, provide appropriate information if visual problems may affect driving and document any advice that has been given. The authors aimed to investigate whether in glaucoma clinics: (1) driving status is being documented, (2) appropriate patients have been advised to inform DVLA and (3) there is documentation that this advice was provided.
Methods
A prospective, observational study of 133 patients presenting to subspecialty glaucoma clinics in two hospitals between December 2014 and March 2015. Patients were interviewed and had their electronic medical records examined at the time of consultation.
Results
Of 133 patients, 50.4% (67/133) had previous documentation of driving status. A total of 88 patients were drivers, and 54 of these drivers had a diagnosis of glaucoma. Twenty-four patients were drivers with bilateral glaucomatous visual field defects, thus meeting the criteria that necessitate informing the DVLA. Of these patients, 45.8% (11/24) had documentation of driving status, 54.2% (13/24) had been advised to inform DVLA, and 4.2% (1/24) had documentation that this advice was provided.
Conclusions
We found there was a lack in documentation of patients’ driving status and advice given to patients. If our results represent the general trend in eye clinics, we must develop a more robust process to improve this. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1007/s10792-017-0473-y |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1870645057</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2033615426</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c372t-4795ae4b046071141668a185cc85a9387d5d00c7b093eb201a4b458b3cb1b2463</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kU1PHDEMhiPUqixLfwCXKlIvXKa18znDpUKIQiWkXso5SjJhGTQf2yQD2gu_vdkuC1KlnmzZj984fgk5QfiCAPprQtANqwB1BULzanNAFihLwhSHd2QBqGQlNeAhOUrpAQAa3agP5JDVjAHX9YI8X_V29tNgqR1b2sbusRtXZ_Q8BvoUaDv5eQhjLrV9j6Zs85z-4rZ97NK2tra5K1iiT12-p6tXyfU6TuvY2Rz6DbVumjPN96GLe7Fvx-T9ne1T-PgSl-T2--Wvi-vq5ufVj4vzm8pzzXIldCNtEA6EAo0oUKnaYi29r6VteK1b2QJ47aDhwTFAK5yQtePeoWNC8SU53emWhX7PIWUzdMmHvrdjmOZksNaghIRyvCX5_A_6MM1xLNuZcjOuUAq2FcQd5eOUUgx3pvxzsHFjEMzWHLMzxxRzzNYcsykzn16UZzeE9nVi70YB2A5IpTWuQnx7-v-qfwAUv5si</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2033615426</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Glaucoma and driving: Are we documenting driving status and advising patients with glaucoma appropriately about their driving?</title><source>SpringerLink Journals</source><creator>Sachdev, Amun ; Tahhan, Mazen ; Sung, Velota Ching Tak</creator><creatorcontrib>Sachdev, Amun ; Tahhan, Mazen ; Sung, Velota Ching Tak</creatorcontrib><description>Purpose
Guidelines from the Driver and Vehicle Licensing Agency (DVLA) in the UK state that patients with bilateral glaucomatous visual field defects must stop driving unless confirmed able to meet minimum visual field requirements. Guidelines from the Royal College of Ophthalmologists state that ophthalmologists must consider driving status in every consultation, provide appropriate information if visual problems may affect driving and document any advice that has been given. The authors aimed to investigate whether in glaucoma clinics: (1) driving status is being documented, (2) appropriate patients have been advised to inform DVLA and (3) there is documentation that this advice was provided.
Methods
A prospective, observational study of 133 patients presenting to subspecialty glaucoma clinics in two hospitals between December 2014 and March 2015. Patients were interviewed and had their electronic medical records examined at the time of consultation.
Results
Of 133 patients, 50.4% (67/133) had previous documentation of driving status. A total of 88 patients were drivers, and 54 of these drivers had a diagnosis of glaucoma. Twenty-four patients were drivers with bilateral glaucomatous visual field defects, thus meeting the criteria that necessitate informing the DVLA. Of these patients, 45.8% (11/24) had documentation of driving status, 54.2% (13/24) had been advised to inform DVLA, and 4.2% (1/24) had documentation that this advice was provided.
Conclusions
We found there was a lack in documentation of patients’ driving status and advice given to patients. If our results represent the general trend in eye clinics, we must develop a more robust process to improve this.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0165-5701</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1573-2630</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s10792-017-0473-y</identifier><identifier>PMID: 28220378</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands</publisher><subject>Consultation ; Defects ; Documentation ; Electronic health records ; Electronic medical records ; Glaucoma ; Guidelines ; Medical personnel ; Medicine ; Medicine & Public Health ; Ophthalmology ; Original Paper ; Patients ; Visual field ; Visual fields</subject><ispartof>International ophthalmology, 2018-04, Vol.38 (2), p.419-423</ispartof><rights>Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2017</rights><rights>International Ophthalmology is a copyright of Springer, (2017). All Rights Reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c372t-4795ae4b046071141668a185cc85a9387d5d00c7b093eb201a4b458b3cb1b2463</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c372t-4795ae4b046071141668a185cc85a9387d5d00c7b093eb201a4b458b3cb1b2463</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s10792-017-0473-y$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10792-017-0473-y$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902,41464,42533,51294</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28220378$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Sachdev, Amun</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tahhan, Mazen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sung, Velota Ching Tak</creatorcontrib><title>Glaucoma and driving: Are we documenting driving status and advising patients with glaucoma appropriately about their driving?</title><title>International ophthalmology</title><addtitle>Int Ophthalmol</addtitle><addtitle>Int Ophthalmol</addtitle><description>Purpose
Guidelines from the Driver and Vehicle Licensing Agency (DVLA) in the UK state that patients with bilateral glaucomatous visual field defects must stop driving unless confirmed able to meet minimum visual field requirements. Guidelines from the Royal College of Ophthalmologists state that ophthalmologists must consider driving status in every consultation, provide appropriate information if visual problems may affect driving and document any advice that has been given. The authors aimed to investigate whether in glaucoma clinics: (1) driving status is being documented, (2) appropriate patients have been advised to inform DVLA and (3) there is documentation that this advice was provided.
Methods
A prospective, observational study of 133 patients presenting to subspecialty glaucoma clinics in two hospitals between December 2014 and March 2015. Patients were interviewed and had their electronic medical records examined at the time of consultation.
Results
Of 133 patients, 50.4% (67/133) had previous documentation of driving status. A total of 88 patients were drivers, and 54 of these drivers had a diagnosis of glaucoma. Twenty-four patients were drivers with bilateral glaucomatous visual field defects, thus meeting the criteria that necessitate informing the DVLA. Of these patients, 45.8% (11/24) had documentation of driving status, 54.2% (13/24) had been advised to inform DVLA, and 4.2% (1/24) had documentation that this advice was provided.
Conclusions
We found there was a lack in documentation of patients’ driving status and advice given to patients. If our results represent the general trend in eye clinics, we must develop a more robust process to improve this.</description><subject>Consultation</subject><subject>Defects</subject><subject>Documentation</subject><subject>Electronic health records</subject><subject>Electronic medical records</subject><subject>Glaucoma</subject><subject>Guidelines</subject><subject>Medical personnel</subject><subject>Medicine</subject><subject>Medicine & Public Health</subject><subject>Ophthalmology</subject><subject>Original Paper</subject><subject>Patients</subject><subject>Visual field</subject><subject>Visual fields</subject><issn>0165-5701</issn><issn>1573-2630</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2018</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kU1PHDEMhiPUqixLfwCXKlIvXKa18znDpUKIQiWkXso5SjJhGTQf2yQD2gu_vdkuC1KlnmzZj984fgk5QfiCAPprQtANqwB1BULzanNAFihLwhSHd2QBqGQlNeAhOUrpAQAa3agP5JDVjAHX9YI8X_V29tNgqR1b2sbusRtXZ_Q8BvoUaDv5eQhjLrV9j6Zs85z-4rZ97NK2tra5K1iiT12-p6tXyfU6TuvY2Rz6DbVumjPN96GLe7Fvx-T9ne1T-PgSl-T2--Wvi-vq5ufVj4vzm8pzzXIldCNtEA6EAo0oUKnaYi29r6VteK1b2QJ47aDhwTFAK5yQtePeoWNC8SU53emWhX7PIWUzdMmHvrdjmOZksNaghIRyvCX5_A_6MM1xLNuZcjOuUAq2FcQd5eOUUgx3pvxzsHFjEMzWHLMzxxRzzNYcsykzn16UZzeE9nVi70YB2A5IpTWuQnx7-v-qfwAUv5si</recordid><startdate>20180401</startdate><enddate>20180401</enddate><creator>Sachdev, Amun</creator><creator>Tahhan, Mazen</creator><creator>Sung, Velota Ching Tak</creator><general>Springer Netherlands</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QL</scope><scope>7T7</scope><scope>7TK</scope><scope>7U9</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20180401</creationdate><title>Glaucoma and driving: Are we documenting driving status and advising patients with glaucoma appropriately about their driving?</title><author>Sachdev, Amun ; Tahhan, Mazen ; Sung, Velota Ching Tak</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c372t-4795ae4b046071141668a185cc85a9387d5d00c7b093eb201a4b458b3cb1b2463</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2018</creationdate><topic>Consultation</topic><topic>Defects</topic><topic>Documentation</topic><topic>Electronic health records</topic><topic>Electronic medical records</topic><topic>Glaucoma</topic><topic>Guidelines</topic><topic>Medical personnel</topic><topic>Medicine</topic><topic>Medicine & Public Health</topic><topic>Ophthalmology</topic><topic>Original Paper</topic><topic>Patients</topic><topic>Visual field</topic><topic>Visual fields</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Sachdev, Amun</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tahhan, Mazen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sung, Velota Ching Tak</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Bacteriology Abstracts (Microbiology B)</collection><collection>Industrial and Applied Microbiology Abstracts (Microbiology A)</collection><collection>Neurosciences Abstracts</collection><collection>Virology and AIDS Abstracts</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>International ophthalmology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Sachdev, Amun</au><au>Tahhan, Mazen</au><au>Sung, Velota Ching Tak</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Glaucoma and driving: Are we documenting driving status and advising patients with glaucoma appropriately about their driving?</atitle><jtitle>International ophthalmology</jtitle><stitle>Int Ophthalmol</stitle><addtitle>Int Ophthalmol</addtitle><date>2018-04-01</date><risdate>2018</risdate><volume>38</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>419</spage><epage>423</epage><pages>419-423</pages><issn>0165-5701</issn><eissn>1573-2630</eissn><abstract>Purpose
Guidelines from the Driver and Vehicle Licensing Agency (DVLA) in the UK state that patients with bilateral glaucomatous visual field defects must stop driving unless confirmed able to meet minimum visual field requirements. Guidelines from the Royal College of Ophthalmologists state that ophthalmologists must consider driving status in every consultation, provide appropriate information if visual problems may affect driving and document any advice that has been given. The authors aimed to investigate whether in glaucoma clinics: (1) driving status is being documented, (2) appropriate patients have been advised to inform DVLA and (3) there is documentation that this advice was provided.
Methods
A prospective, observational study of 133 patients presenting to subspecialty glaucoma clinics in two hospitals between December 2014 and March 2015. Patients were interviewed and had their electronic medical records examined at the time of consultation.
Results
Of 133 patients, 50.4% (67/133) had previous documentation of driving status. A total of 88 patients were drivers, and 54 of these drivers had a diagnosis of glaucoma. Twenty-four patients were drivers with bilateral glaucomatous visual field defects, thus meeting the criteria that necessitate informing the DVLA. Of these patients, 45.8% (11/24) had documentation of driving status, 54.2% (13/24) had been advised to inform DVLA, and 4.2% (1/24) had documentation that this advice was provided.
Conclusions
We found there was a lack in documentation of patients’ driving status and advice given to patients. If our results represent the general trend in eye clinics, we must develop a more robust process to improve this.</abstract><cop>Dordrecht</cop><pub>Springer Netherlands</pub><pmid>28220378</pmid><doi>10.1007/s10792-017-0473-y</doi><tpages>5</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0165-5701 |
ispartof | International ophthalmology, 2018-04, Vol.38 (2), p.419-423 |
issn | 0165-5701 1573-2630 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1870645057 |
source | SpringerLink Journals |
subjects | Consultation Defects Documentation Electronic health records Electronic medical records Glaucoma Guidelines Medical personnel Medicine Medicine & Public Health Ophthalmology Original Paper Patients Visual field Visual fields |
title | Glaucoma and driving: Are we documenting driving status and advising patients with glaucoma appropriately about their driving? |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-15T02%3A10%3A15IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Glaucoma%20and%20driving:%20Are%20we%20documenting%20driving%20status%20and%20advising%20patients%20with%20glaucoma%20appropriately%20about%20their%20driving?&rft.jtitle=International%20ophthalmology&rft.au=Sachdev,%20Amun&rft.date=2018-04-01&rft.volume=38&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=419&rft.epage=423&rft.pages=419-423&rft.issn=0165-5701&rft.eissn=1573-2630&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s10792-017-0473-y&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2033615426%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2033615426&rft_id=info:pmid/28220378&rfr_iscdi=true |