Does a foot-drop implant improve kinetic and kinematic parameters in the foot and ankle?

Introduction Unlike the drop foot therapy with ortheses, the therapeutic effect of an implantable peroneus nerve stimulator (iPNS) is not well described. IPNS is a dynamic therapy option which is placed directly to the motoric part of the peroneal nerve and evokes a dorsiflexion of the paralysed foo...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Archives of orthopaedic and trauma surgery 2017-04, Vol.137 (4), p.499-506
Hauptverfasser: Daniilidis, Kiriakos, Jakubowitz, Eike, Thomann, Anna, Ettinger, Sarah, Stukenborg-Colsman, Christina, Yao, Daiwei
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 506
container_issue 4
container_start_page 499
container_title Archives of orthopaedic and trauma surgery
container_volume 137
creator Daniilidis, Kiriakos
Jakubowitz, Eike
Thomann, Anna
Ettinger, Sarah
Stukenborg-Colsman, Christina
Yao, Daiwei
description Introduction Unlike the drop foot therapy with ortheses, the therapeutic effect of an implantable peroneus nerve stimulator (iPNS) is not well described. IPNS is a dynamic therapy option which is placed directly to the motoric part of the peroneal nerve and evokes a dorsiflexion of the paralysed foot. This retrospective study evaluates the kinematics and kinetics in drop foot patients who were treated with an iPNS. Materials and methods 18 subjects (mean age 51.3 years) with a chronic stroke-related drop foot were treated with an implantable peroneal nerve stimulator. After a mean follow-up from 12.5 months, kinematics and kinetics as well as spatiotemporal parameters were evaluated and compared in activated and deactivated iPNS. Therefore, a gait analysis with motion capture system (Vicon Motion System Ltd®, Oxford, UK) and Plug-in-Gait model was performed. Results The study showed significantly improved results in ankle dorsiflexion from 6.8° to 1.8° at the initial contact and from −7.3° to 0.9° during swing phase ( p  ≤ 0.004 and p  ≤ 0.005, respectively). Likewise, we could measure improved kinetics, i.a. with a statistically significant improvement in vertical ground reaction force at loading response from 99.76 to 106.71 N/kg ( p  = 0.043). Enhanced spatiotemporal results in cadence, douple support, stride length, and walking speed could also be achieved, but without statistical significance ( p  > 0.05). Conclusions The results show statistically significant improvement in ankle dorsiflexion and vertical ground reaction forces. These facts indicate a more gait stability and gait efficacy. Therefore, the use of an iPNS appears an encouraging therapeutic option for patients with a stroke-related drop foot.
doi_str_mv 10.1007/s00402-017-2652-8
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1870645032</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2261903488</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-p212t-cf1edac95bc90dafcc9dcd46220658930c2cd8a33888328fb1a8e95c695eb4f23</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpdkU1LAzEQhoMotlZ_gBdZ8OIlOkl20-QkUj-h4EXBW8gmWd12v0x2Bf-92bYieJoMeXjnnXkROiVwSQDmVwEgBYqBzDHlGcViD01JylLMJOH7aAqScSwgIxN0FMIKgFAh4RBNqKAUKCdT9HbbupDopGjbHlvfdklZd5Vu-rH69ssl67JxfWkS3djNu9Zj12mva9c7H5KySfoPt1HYQLpZV-76GB0UugruZFdn6PX-7mXxiJfPD0-LmyXuKKE9NgVxVhuZ5UaC1YUx0hqb8uiPZ0IyMNRYoRkTQjAqipxo4WRmuMxcnhaUzdDFVje6_Rxc6FVdBuOquINrh6CImANPM2Ajev4PXbWDb6I7ReMxJLA0Dpmhsx015LWzqvNlrf23-r1ZBOgWCPGreXf-T4aAGoNR22BUDEaNwSjBfgC_oH15</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2261903488</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Does a foot-drop implant improve kinetic and kinematic parameters in the foot and ankle?</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings</source><creator>Daniilidis, Kiriakos ; Jakubowitz, Eike ; Thomann, Anna ; Ettinger, Sarah ; Stukenborg-Colsman, Christina ; Yao, Daiwei</creator><creatorcontrib>Daniilidis, Kiriakos ; Jakubowitz, Eike ; Thomann, Anna ; Ettinger, Sarah ; Stukenborg-Colsman, Christina ; Yao, Daiwei</creatorcontrib><description>Introduction Unlike the drop foot therapy with ortheses, the therapeutic effect of an implantable peroneus nerve stimulator (iPNS) is not well described. IPNS is a dynamic therapy option which is placed directly to the motoric part of the peroneal nerve and evokes a dorsiflexion of the paralysed foot. This retrospective study evaluates the kinematics and kinetics in drop foot patients who were treated with an iPNS. Materials and methods 18 subjects (mean age 51.3 years) with a chronic stroke-related drop foot were treated with an implantable peroneal nerve stimulator. After a mean follow-up from 12.5 months, kinematics and kinetics as well as spatiotemporal parameters were evaluated and compared in activated and deactivated iPNS. Therefore, a gait analysis with motion capture system (Vicon Motion System Ltd®, Oxford, UK) and Plug-in-Gait model was performed. Results The study showed significantly improved results in ankle dorsiflexion from 6.8° to 1.8° at the initial contact and from −7.3° to 0.9° during swing phase ( p  ≤ 0.004 and p  ≤ 0.005, respectively). Likewise, we could measure improved kinetics, i.a. with a statistically significant improvement in vertical ground reaction force at loading response from 99.76 to 106.71 N/kg ( p  = 0.043). Enhanced spatiotemporal results in cadence, douple support, stride length, and walking speed could also be achieved, but without statistical significance ( p  &gt; 0.05). Conclusions The results show statistically significant improvement in ankle dorsiflexion and vertical ground reaction forces. These facts indicate a more gait stability and gait efficacy. Therefore, the use of an iPNS appears an encouraging therapeutic option for patients with a stroke-related drop foot.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0936-8051</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1434-3916</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s00402-017-2652-8</identifier><identifier>PMID: 28220261</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Berlin/Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg</publisher><subject>Adult ; Ankle ; Ankle - physiology ; Biomechanical Phenomena ; Electric Stimulation Therapy - methods ; Female ; Foot - physiology ; Gait ; Gait - physiology ; Gait Disorders, Neurologic - etiology ; Gait Disorders, Neurologic - physiopathology ; Gait Disorders, Neurologic - therapy ; Humans ; Kinematics ; Kinetics ; Male ; Medicine ; Medicine &amp; Public Health ; Middle Aged ; Orthopaedic Surgery ; Orthopedics ; Peroneal Nerve ; Prostheses and Implants ; Retrospective Studies ; Stroke - complications ; Stroke - therapy ; Treatment Outcome</subject><ispartof>Archives of orthopaedic and trauma surgery, 2017-04, Vol.137 (4), p.499-506</ispartof><rights>Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2017</rights><rights>Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery is a copyright of Springer, (2017). All Rights Reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-p212t-cf1edac95bc90dafcc9dcd46220658930c2cd8a33888328fb1a8e95c695eb4f23</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s00402-017-2652-8$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1007/s00402-017-2652-8$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925,41488,42557,51319</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28220261$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Daniilidis, Kiriakos</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jakubowitz, Eike</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Thomann, Anna</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ettinger, Sarah</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stukenborg-Colsman, Christina</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yao, Daiwei</creatorcontrib><title>Does a foot-drop implant improve kinetic and kinematic parameters in the foot and ankle?</title><title>Archives of orthopaedic and trauma surgery</title><addtitle>Arch Orthop Trauma Surg</addtitle><addtitle>Arch Orthop Trauma Surg</addtitle><description>Introduction Unlike the drop foot therapy with ortheses, the therapeutic effect of an implantable peroneus nerve stimulator (iPNS) is not well described. IPNS is a dynamic therapy option which is placed directly to the motoric part of the peroneal nerve and evokes a dorsiflexion of the paralysed foot. This retrospective study evaluates the kinematics and kinetics in drop foot patients who were treated with an iPNS. Materials and methods 18 subjects (mean age 51.3 years) with a chronic stroke-related drop foot were treated with an implantable peroneal nerve stimulator. After a mean follow-up from 12.5 months, kinematics and kinetics as well as spatiotemporal parameters were evaluated and compared in activated and deactivated iPNS. Therefore, a gait analysis with motion capture system (Vicon Motion System Ltd®, Oxford, UK) and Plug-in-Gait model was performed. Results The study showed significantly improved results in ankle dorsiflexion from 6.8° to 1.8° at the initial contact and from −7.3° to 0.9° during swing phase ( p  ≤ 0.004 and p  ≤ 0.005, respectively). Likewise, we could measure improved kinetics, i.a. with a statistically significant improvement in vertical ground reaction force at loading response from 99.76 to 106.71 N/kg ( p  = 0.043). Enhanced spatiotemporal results in cadence, douple support, stride length, and walking speed could also be achieved, but without statistical significance ( p  &gt; 0.05). Conclusions The results show statistically significant improvement in ankle dorsiflexion and vertical ground reaction forces. These facts indicate a more gait stability and gait efficacy. Therefore, the use of an iPNS appears an encouraging therapeutic option for patients with a stroke-related drop foot.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Ankle</subject><subject>Ankle - physiology</subject><subject>Biomechanical Phenomena</subject><subject>Electric Stimulation Therapy - methods</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Foot - physiology</subject><subject>Gait</subject><subject>Gait - physiology</subject><subject>Gait Disorders, Neurologic - etiology</subject><subject>Gait Disorders, Neurologic - physiopathology</subject><subject>Gait Disorders, Neurologic - therapy</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Kinematics</subject><subject>Kinetics</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Medicine</subject><subject>Medicine &amp; Public Health</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Orthopaedic Surgery</subject><subject>Orthopedics</subject><subject>Peroneal Nerve</subject><subject>Prostheses and Implants</subject><subject>Retrospective Studies</subject><subject>Stroke - complications</subject><subject>Stroke - therapy</subject><subject>Treatment Outcome</subject><issn>0936-8051</issn><issn>1434-3916</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2017</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><recordid>eNpdkU1LAzEQhoMotlZ_gBdZ8OIlOkl20-QkUj-h4EXBW8gmWd12v0x2Bf-92bYieJoMeXjnnXkROiVwSQDmVwEgBYqBzDHlGcViD01JylLMJOH7aAqScSwgIxN0FMIKgFAh4RBNqKAUKCdT9HbbupDopGjbHlvfdklZd5Vu-rH69ssl67JxfWkS3djNu9Zj12mva9c7H5KySfoPt1HYQLpZV-76GB0UugruZFdn6PX-7mXxiJfPD0-LmyXuKKE9NgVxVhuZ5UaC1YUx0hqb8uiPZ0IyMNRYoRkTQjAqipxo4WRmuMxcnhaUzdDFVje6_Rxc6FVdBuOquINrh6CImANPM2Ajev4PXbWDb6I7ReMxJLA0Dpmhsx015LWzqvNlrf23-r1ZBOgWCPGreXf-T4aAGoNR22BUDEaNwSjBfgC_oH15</recordid><startdate>20170401</startdate><enddate>20170401</enddate><creator>Daniilidis, Kiriakos</creator><creator>Jakubowitz, Eike</creator><creator>Thomann, Anna</creator><creator>Ettinger, Sarah</creator><creator>Stukenborg-Colsman, Christina</creator><creator>Yao, Daiwei</creator><general>Springer Berlin Heidelberg</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20170401</creationdate><title>Does a foot-drop implant improve kinetic and kinematic parameters in the foot and ankle?</title><author>Daniilidis, Kiriakos ; Jakubowitz, Eike ; Thomann, Anna ; Ettinger, Sarah ; Stukenborg-Colsman, Christina ; Yao, Daiwei</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-p212t-cf1edac95bc90dafcc9dcd46220658930c2cd8a33888328fb1a8e95c695eb4f23</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2017</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Ankle</topic><topic>Ankle - physiology</topic><topic>Biomechanical Phenomena</topic><topic>Electric Stimulation Therapy - methods</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Foot - physiology</topic><topic>Gait</topic><topic>Gait - physiology</topic><topic>Gait Disorders, Neurologic - etiology</topic><topic>Gait Disorders, Neurologic - physiopathology</topic><topic>Gait Disorders, Neurologic - therapy</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Kinematics</topic><topic>Kinetics</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Medicine</topic><topic>Medicine &amp; Public Health</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Orthopaedic Surgery</topic><topic>Orthopedics</topic><topic>Peroneal Nerve</topic><topic>Prostheses and Implants</topic><topic>Retrospective Studies</topic><topic>Stroke - complications</topic><topic>Stroke - therapy</topic><topic>Treatment Outcome</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Daniilidis, Kiriakos</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jakubowitz, Eike</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Thomann, Anna</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ettinger, Sarah</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stukenborg-Colsman, Christina</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yao, Daiwei</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Database</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Archives of orthopaedic and trauma surgery</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Daniilidis, Kiriakos</au><au>Jakubowitz, Eike</au><au>Thomann, Anna</au><au>Ettinger, Sarah</au><au>Stukenborg-Colsman, Christina</au><au>Yao, Daiwei</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Does a foot-drop implant improve kinetic and kinematic parameters in the foot and ankle?</atitle><jtitle>Archives of orthopaedic and trauma surgery</jtitle><stitle>Arch Orthop Trauma Surg</stitle><addtitle>Arch Orthop Trauma Surg</addtitle><date>2017-04-01</date><risdate>2017</risdate><volume>137</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>499</spage><epage>506</epage><pages>499-506</pages><issn>0936-8051</issn><eissn>1434-3916</eissn><abstract>Introduction Unlike the drop foot therapy with ortheses, the therapeutic effect of an implantable peroneus nerve stimulator (iPNS) is not well described. IPNS is a dynamic therapy option which is placed directly to the motoric part of the peroneal nerve and evokes a dorsiflexion of the paralysed foot. This retrospective study evaluates the kinematics and kinetics in drop foot patients who were treated with an iPNS. Materials and methods 18 subjects (mean age 51.3 years) with a chronic stroke-related drop foot were treated with an implantable peroneal nerve stimulator. After a mean follow-up from 12.5 months, kinematics and kinetics as well as spatiotemporal parameters were evaluated and compared in activated and deactivated iPNS. Therefore, a gait analysis with motion capture system (Vicon Motion System Ltd®, Oxford, UK) and Plug-in-Gait model was performed. Results The study showed significantly improved results in ankle dorsiflexion from 6.8° to 1.8° at the initial contact and from −7.3° to 0.9° during swing phase ( p  ≤ 0.004 and p  ≤ 0.005, respectively). Likewise, we could measure improved kinetics, i.a. with a statistically significant improvement in vertical ground reaction force at loading response from 99.76 to 106.71 N/kg ( p  = 0.043). Enhanced spatiotemporal results in cadence, douple support, stride length, and walking speed could also be achieved, but without statistical significance ( p  &gt; 0.05). Conclusions The results show statistically significant improvement in ankle dorsiflexion and vertical ground reaction forces. These facts indicate a more gait stability and gait efficacy. Therefore, the use of an iPNS appears an encouraging therapeutic option for patients with a stroke-related drop foot.</abstract><cop>Berlin/Heidelberg</cop><pub>Springer Berlin Heidelberg</pub><pmid>28220261</pmid><doi>10.1007/s00402-017-2652-8</doi><tpages>8</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0936-8051
ispartof Archives of orthopaedic and trauma surgery, 2017-04, Vol.137 (4), p.499-506
issn 0936-8051
1434-3916
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1870645032
source MEDLINE; SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings
subjects Adult
Ankle
Ankle - physiology
Biomechanical Phenomena
Electric Stimulation Therapy - methods
Female
Foot - physiology
Gait
Gait - physiology
Gait Disorders, Neurologic - etiology
Gait Disorders, Neurologic - physiopathology
Gait Disorders, Neurologic - therapy
Humans
Kinematics
Kinetics
Male
Medicine
Medicine & Public Health
Middle Aged
Orthopaedic Surgery
Orthopedics
Peroneal Nerve
Prostheses and Implants
Retrospective Studies
Stroke - complications
Stroke - therapy
Treatment Outcome
title Does a foot-drop implant improve kinetic and kinematic parameters in the foot and ankle?
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-02T07%3A27%3A26IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Does%20a%20foot-drop%20implant%20improve%20kinetic%20and%20kinematic%20parameters%20in%20the%20foot%20and%20ankle?&rft.jtitle=Archives%20of%20orthopaedic%20and%20trauma%20surgery&rft.au=Daniilidis,%20Kiriakos&rft.date=2017-04-01&rft.volume=137&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=499&rft.epage=506&rft.pages=499-506&rft.issn=0936-8051&rft.eissn=1434-3916&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s00402-017-2652-8&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E2261903488%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2261903488&rft_id=info:pmid/28220261&rfr_iscdi=true