Does a foot-drop implant improve kinetic and kinematic parameters in the foot and ankle?
Introduction Unlike the drop foot therapy with ortheses, the therapeutic effect of an implantable peroneus nerve stimulator (iPNS) is not well described. IPNS is a dynamic therapy option which is placed directly to the motoric part of the peroneal nerve and evokes a dorsiflexion of the paralysed foo...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Archives of orthopaedic and trauma surgery 2017-04, Vol.137 (4), p.499-506 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 506 |
---|---|
container_issue | 4 |
container_start_page | 499 |
container_title | Archives of orthopaedic and trauma surgery |
container_volume | 137 |
creator | Daniilidis, Kiriakos Jakubowitz, Eike Thomann, Anna Ettinger, Sarah Stukenborg-Colsman, Christina Yao, Daiwei |
description | Introduction
Unlike the drop foot therapy with ortheses, the therapeutic effect of an implantable peroneus nerve stimulator (iPNS) is not well described. IPNS is a dynamic therapy option which is placed directly to the motoric part of the peroneal nerve and evokes a dorsiflexion of the paralysed foot. This retrospective study evaluates the kinematics and kinetics in drop foot patients who were treated with an iPNS.
Materials and methods
18 subjects (mean age 51.3 years) with a chronic stroke-related drop foot were treated with an implantable peroneal nerve stimulator. After a mean follow-up from 12.5 months, kinematics and kinetics as well as spatiotemporal parameters were evaluated and compared in activated and deactivated iPNS. Therefore, a gait analysis with motion capture system (Vicon Motion System Ltd®, Oxford, UK) and Plug-in-Gait model was performed.
Results
The study showed significantly improved results in ankle dorsiflexion from 6.8° to 1.8° at the initial contact and from −7.3° to 0.9° during swing phase (
p
≤ 0.004 and
p
≤ 0.005, respectively). Likewise, we could measure improved kinetics, i.a. with a statistically significant improvement in vertical ground reaction force at loading response from 99.76 to 106.71 N/kg (
p
= 0.043). Enhanced spatiotemporal results in cadence, douple support, stride length, and walking speed could also be achieved, but without statistical significance (
p
> 0.05).
Conclusions
The results show statistically significant improvement in ankle dorsiflexion and vertical ground reaction forces. These facts indicate a more gait stability and gait efficacy. Therefore, the use of an iPNS appears an encouraging therapeutic option for patients with a stroke-related drop foot. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1007/s00402-017-2652-8 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1870645032</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2261903488</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-p212t-cf1edac95bc90dafcc9dcd46220658930c2cd8a33888328fb1a8e95c695eb4f23</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpdkU1LAzEQhoMotlZ_gBdZ8OIlOkl20-QkUj-h4EXBW8gmWd12v0x2Bf-92bYieJoMeXjnnXkROiVwSQDmVwEgBYqBzDHlGcViD01JylLMJOH7aAqScSwgIxN0FMIKgFAh4RBNqKAUKCdT9HbbupDopGjbHlvfdklZd5Vu-rH69ssl67JxfWkS3djNu9Zj12mva9c7H5KySfoPt1HYQLpZV-76GB0UugruZFdn6PX-7mXxiJfPD0-LmyXuKKE9NgVxVhuZ5UaC1YUx0hqb8uiPZ0IyMNRYoRkTQjAqipxo4WRmuMxcnhaUzdDFVje6_Rxc6FVdBuOquINrh6CImANPM2Ajev4PXbWDb6I7ReMxJLA0Dpmhsx015LWzqvNlrf23-r1ZBOgWCPGreXf-T4aAGoNR22BUDEaNwSjBfgC_oH15</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2261903488</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Does a foot-drop implant improve kinetic and kinematic parameters in the foot and ankle?</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings</source><creator>Daniilidis, Kiriakos ; Jakubowitz, Eike ; Thomann, Anna ; Ettinger, Sarah ; Stukenborg-Colsman, Christina ; Yao, Daiwei</creator><creatorcontrib>Daniilidis, Kiriakos ; Jakubowitz, Eike ; Thomann, Anna ; Ettinger, Sarah ; Stukenborg-Colsman, Christina ; Yao, Daiwei</creatorcontrib><description>Introduction
Unlike the drop foot therapy with ortheses, the therapeutic effect of an implantable peroneus nerve stimulator (iPNS) is not well described. IPNS is a dynamic therapy option which is placed directly to the motoric part of the peroneal nerve and evokes a dorsiflexion of the paralysed foot. This retrospective study evaluates the kinematics and kinetics in drop foot patients who were treated with an iPNS.
Materials and methods
18 subjects (mean age 51.3 years) with a chronic stroke-related drop foot were treated with an implantable peroneal nerve stimulator. After a mean follow-up from 12.5 months, kinematics and kinetics as well as spatiotemporal parameters were evaluated and compared in activated and deactivated iPNS. Therefore, a gait analysis with motion capture system (Vicon Motion System Ltd®, Oxford, UK) and Plug-in-Gait model was performed.
Results
The study showed significantly improved results in ankle dorsiflexion from 6.8° to 1.8° at the initial contact and from −7.3° to 0.9° during swing phase (
p
≤ 0.004 and
p
≤ 0.005, respectively). Likewise, we could measure improved kinetics, i.a. with a statistically significant improvement in vertical ground reaction force at loading response from 99.76 to 106.71 N/kg (
p
= 0.043). Enhanced spatiotemporal results in cadence, douple support, stride length, and walking speed could also be achieved, but without statistical significance (
p
> 0.05).
Conclusions
The results show statistically significant improvement in ankle dorsiflexion and vertical ground reaction forces. These facts indicate a more gait stability and gait efficacy. Therefore, the use of an iPNS appears an encouraging therapeutic option for patients with a stroke-related drop foot.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0936-8051</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1434-3916</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s00402-017-2652-8</identifier><identifier>PMID: 28220261</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Berlin/Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg</publisher><subject>Adult ; Ankle ; Ankle - physiology ; Biomechanical Phenomena ; Electric Stimulation Therapy - methods ; Female ; Foot - physiology ; Gait ; Gait - physiology ; Gait Disorders, Neurologic - etiology ; Gait Disorders, Neurologic - physiopathology ; Gait Disorders, Neurologic - therapy ; Humans ; Kinematics ; Kinetics ; Male ; Medicine ; Medicine & Public Health ; Middle Aged ; Orthopaedic Surgery ; Orthopedics ; Peroneal Nerve ; Prostheses and Implants ; Retrospective Studies ; Stroke - complications ; Stroke - therapy ; Treatment Outcome</subject><ispartof>Archives of orthopaedic and trauma surgery, 2017-04, Vol.137 (4), p.499-506</ispartof><rights>Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2017</rights><rights>Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery is a copyright of Springer, (2017). All Rights Reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-p212t-cf1edac95bc90dafcc9dcd46220658930c2cd8a33888328fb1a8e95c695eb4f23</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s00402-017-2652-8$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1007/s00402-017-2652-8$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925,41488,42557,51319</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28220261$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Daniilidis, Kiriakos</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jakubowitz, Eike</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Thomann, Anna</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ettinger, Sarah</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stukenborg-Colsman, Christina</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yao, Daiwei</creatorcontrib><title>Does a foot-drop implant improve kinetic and kinematic parameters in the foot and ankle?</title><title>Archives of orthopaedic and trauma surgery</title><addtitle>Arch Orthop Trauma Surg</addtitle><addtitle>Arch Orthop Trauma Surg</addtitle><description>Introduction
Unlike the drop foot therapy with ortheses, the therapeutic effect of an implantable peroneus nerve stimulator (iPNS) is not well described. IPNS is a dynamic therapy option which is placed directly to the motoric part of the peroneal nerve and evokes a dorsiflexion of the paralysed foot. This retrospective study evaluates the kinematics and kinetics in drop foot patients who were treated with an iPNS.
Materials and methods
18 subjects (mean age 51.3 years) with a chronic stroke-related drop foot were treated with an implantable peroneal nerve stimulator. After a mean follow-up from 12.5 months, kinematics and kinetics as well as spatiotemporal parameters were evaluated and compared in activated and deactivated iPNS. Therefore, a gait analysis with motion capture system (Vicon Motion System Ltd®, Oxford, UK) and Plug-in-Gait model was performed.
Results
The study showed significantly improved results in ankle dorsiflexion from 6.8° to 1.8° at the initial contact and from −7.3° to 0.9° during swing phase (
p
≤ 0.004 and
p
≤ 0.005, respectively). Likewise, we could measure improved kinetics, i.a. with a statistically significant improvement in vertical ground reaction force at loading response from 99.76 to 106.71 N/kg (
p
= 0.043). Enhanced spatiotemporal results in cadence, douple support, stride length, and walking speed could also be achieved, but without statistical significance (
p
> 0.05).
Conclusions
The results show statistically significant improvement in ankle dorsiflexion and vertical ground reaction forces. These facts indicate a more gait stability and gait efficacy. Therefore, the use of an iPNS appears an encouraging therapeutic option for patients with a stroke-related drop foot.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Ankle</subject><subject>Ankle - physiology</subject><subject>Biomechanical Phenomena</subject><subject>Electric Stimulation Therapy - methods</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Foot - physiology</subject><subject>Gait</subject><subject>Gait - physiology</subject><subject>Gait Disorders, Neurologic - etiology</subject><subject>Gait Disorders, Neurologic - physiopathology</subject><subject>Gait Disorders, Neurologic - therapy</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Kinematics</subject><subject>Kinetics</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Medicine</subject><subject>Medicine & Public Health</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Orthopaedic Surgery</subject><subject>Orthopedics</subject><subject>Peroneal Nerve</subject><subject>Prostheses and Implants</subject><subject>Retrospective Studies</subject><subject>Stroke - complications</subject><subject>Stroke - therapy</subject><subject>Treatment Outcome</subject><issn>0936-8051</issn><issn>1434-3916</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2017</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><recordid>eNpdkU1LAzEQhoMotlZ_gBdZ8OIlOkl20-QkUj-h4EXBW8gmWd12v0x2Bf-92bYieJoMeXjnnXkROiVwSQDmVwEgBYqBzDHlGcViD01JylLMJOH7aAqScSwgIxN0FMIKgFAh4RBNqKAUKCdT9HbbupDopGjbHlvfdklZd5Vu-rH69ssl67JxfWkS3djNu9Zj12mva9c7H5KySfoPt1HYQLpZV-76GB0UugruZFdn6PX-7mXxiJfPD0-LmyXuKKE9NgVxVhuZ5UaC1YUx0hqb8uiPZ0IyMNRYoRkTQjAqipxo4WRmuMxcnhaUzdDFVje6_Rxc6FVdBuOquINrh6CImANPM2Ajev4PXbWDb6I7ReMxJLA0Dpmhsx015LWzqvNlrf23-r1ZBOgWCPGreXf-T4aAGoNR22BUDEaNwSjBfgC_oH15</recordid><startdate>20170401</startdate><enddate>20170401</enddate><creator>Daniilidis, Kiriakos</creator><creator>Jakubowitz, Eike</creator><creator>Thomann, Anna</creator><creator>Ettinger, Sarah</creator><creator>Stukenborg-Colsman, Christina</creator><creator>Yao, Daiwei</creator><general>Springer Berlin Heidelberg</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20170401</creationdate><title>Does a foot-drop implant improve kinetic and kinematic parameters in the foot and ankle?</title><author>Daniilidis, Kiriakos ; Jakubowitz, Eike ; Thomann, Anna ; Ettinger, Sarah ; Stukenborg-Colsman, Christina ; Yao, Daiwei</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-p212t-cf1edac95bc90dafcc9dcd46220658930c2cd8a33888328fb1a8e95c695eb4f23</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2017</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Ankle</topic><topic>Ankle - physiology</topic><topic>Biomechanical Phenomena</topic><topic>Electric Stimulation Therapy - methods</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Foot - physiology</topic><topic>Gait</topic><topic>Gait - physiology</topic><topic>Gait Disorders, Neurologic - etiology</topic><topic>Gait Disorders, Neurologic - physiopathology</topic><topic>Gait Disorders, Neurologic - therapy</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Kinematics</topic><topic>Kinetics</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Medicine</topic><topic>Medicine & Public Health</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Orthopaedic Surgery</topic><topic>Orthopedics</topic><topic>Peroneal Nerve</topic><topic>Prostheses and Implants</topic><topic>Retrospective Studies</topic><topic>Stroke - complications</topic><topic>Stroke - therapy</topic><topic>Treatment Outcome</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Daniilidis, Kiriakos</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jakubowitz, Eike</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Thomann, Anna</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ettinger, Sarah</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stukenborg-Colsman, Christina</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yao, Daiwei</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Archives of orthopaedic and trauma surgery</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Daniilidis, Kiriakos</au><au>Jakubowitz, Eike</au><au>Thomann, Anna</au><au>Ettinger, Sarah</au><au>Stukenborg-Colsman, Christina</au><au>Yao, Daiwei</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Does a foot-drop implant improve kinetic and kinematic parameters in the foot and ankle?</atitle><jtitle>Archives of orthopaedic and trauma surgery</jtitle><stitle>Arch Orthop Trauma Surg</stitle><addtitle>Arch Orthop Trauma Surg</addtitle><date>2017-04-01</date><risdate>2017</risdate><volume>137</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>499</spage><epage>506</epage><pages>499-506</pages><issn>0936-8051</issn><eissn>1434-3916</eissn><abstract>Introduction
Unlike the drop foot therapy with ortheses, the therapeutic effect of an implantable peroneus nerve stimulator (iPNS) is not well described. IPNS is a dynamic therapy option which is placed directly to the motoric part of the peroneal nerve and evokes a dorsiflexion of the paralysed foot. This retrospective study evaluates the kinematics and kinetics in drop foot patients who were treated with an iPNS.
Materials and methods
18 subjects (mean age 51.3 years) with a chronic stroke-related drop foot were treated with an implantable peroneal nerve stimulator. After a mean follow-up from 12.5 months, kinematics and kinetics as well as spatiotemporal parameters were evaluated and compared in activated and deactivated iPNS. Therefore, a gait analysis with motion capture system (Vicon Motion System Ltd®, Oxford, UK) and Plug-in-Gait model was performed.
Results
The study showed significantly improved results in ankle dorsiflexion from 6.8° to 1.8° at the initial contact and from −7.3° to 0.9° during swing phase (
p
≤ 0.004 and
p
≤ 0.005, respectively). Likewise, we could measure improved kinetics, i.a. with a statistically significant improvement in vertical ground reaction force at loading response from 99.76 to 106.71 N/kg (
p
= 0.043). Enhanced spatiotemporal results in cadence, douple support, stride length, and walking speed could also be achieved, but without statistical significance (
p
> 0.05).
Conclusions
The results show statistically significant improvement in ankle dorsiflexion and vertical ground reaction forces. These facts indicate a more gait stability and gait efficacy. Therefore, the use of an iPNS appears an encouraging therapeutic option for patients with a stroke-related drop foot.</abstract><cop>Berlin/Heidelberg</cop><pub>Springer Berlin Heidelberg</pub><pmid>28220261</pmid><doi>10.1007/s00402-017-2652-8</doi><tpages>8</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0936-8051 |
ispartof | Archives of orthopaedic and trauma surgery, 2017-04, Vol.137 (4), p.499-506 |
issn | 0936-8051 1434-3916 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1870645032 |
source | MEDLINE; SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings |
subjects | Adult Ankle Ankle - physiology Biomechanical Phenomena Electric Stimulation Therapy - methods Female Foot - physiology Gait Gait - physiology Gait Disorders, Neurologic - etiology Gait Disorders, Neurologic - physiopathology Gait Disorders, Neurologic - therapy Humans Kinematics Kinetics Male Medicine Medicine & Public Health Middle Aged Orthopaedic Surgery Orthopedics Peroneal Nerve Prostheses and Implants Retrospective Studies Stroke - complications Stroke - therapy Treatment Outcome |
title | Does a foot-drop implant improve kinetic and kinematic parameters in the foot and ankle? |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-02T07%3A27%3A26IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Does%20a%20foot-drop%20implant%20improve%20kinetic%20and%20kinematic%20parameters%20in%20the%20foot%20and%20ankle?&rft.jtitle=Archives%20of%20orthopaedic%20and%20trauma%20surgery&rft.au=Daniilidis,%20Kiriakos&rft.date=2017-04-01&rft.volume=137&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=499&rft.epage=506&rft.pages=499-506&rft.issn=0936-8051&rft.eissn=1434-3916&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s00402-017-2652-8&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E2261903488%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2261903488&rft_id=info:pmid/28220261&rfr_iscdi=true |