Diagnostic yield of CT urography in the evaluation of hematuria in young patients in a military population

Purpose To assess the diagnostic yield of a computed tomography urography (CTU) study in patients less than 50 years of age, who have a history of military service, and who are at increased risk of urological cancers secondary to harmful practices and work-related exposures. Methods 137 Consecutive...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Abdominal imaging 2017-07, Vol.42 (7), p.1906-1910
Hauptverfasser: Mace, Laura R., Galloway, Terrel L., Ma, Andrew, Montgomery, Richard S., Rockhill, Ryan C., Reynolds, William W., Marks, Robert M.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 1910
container_issue 7
container_start_page 1906
container_title Abdominal imaging
container_volume 42
creator Mace, Laura R.
Galloway, Terrel L.
Ma, Andrew
Montgomery, Richard S.
Rockhill, Ryan C.
Reynolds, William W.
Marks, Robert M.
description Purpose To assess the diagnostic yield of a computed tomography urography (CTU) study in patients less than 50 years of age, who have a history of military service, and who are at increased risk of urological cancers secondary to harmful practices and work-related exposures. Methods 137 Consecutive patients who underwent CTU between 2012 and 2013 for new onset of hematuria were included. Initial review of the clinical interpretations of the CTU studies grouped the studies into negative and positive exams for any urological findings. Review of the patients’ medical records and subsequent radiology studies determined microscopic versus gross hematuria at presentation and any findings after their CTU study consistent with a urological malignancy. The positive exams were reviewed by second readers, blinded to the clinical interpretation of the initial CTU studies, who first read the unenhanced images. The readers characterized findings as visible on non-contrast CT alone or they requested contrast-enhanced images. Each urological finding was recorded for each patient. Results Of the 137 included patients, 84 had micro-hematuria and 53 had gross hematuria. There were a total of 99 negative examinations of the 137 included patients. Contrast was requested 14 times to confirm 11 benign cysts. No findings concerning for malignancy were found by the readers or on subsequent record reviews for each patient. Conclusion An unenhanced CT may be appropriate to evaluate new onset microscopic, and possibly gross hematuria, in patients younger than 40, even in patients at increased risk of urologic cancer.
doi_str_mv 10.1007/s00261-017-1084-9
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1869970334</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1912081112</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c372t-9508478d52ca945daa0af630147ca2d35ed92ae850925e530bc4dfc6d39a3c143</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kU9v1DAQxS0EolXpB-CCLHHhEpix4yQ-oqX8kSpxKRI3a-o4u14lcbBjpP32OGypEBInW36_N-OZx9hLhLcI0L5LAKLBCrCtELq60k_YpZBNUwGo7unjvf5-wa5TOgIANgpRqOfsQnQCZSeaS3b84Gk_h7R6y0_ejT0PA9_d8RzDPtJyOHE_8_XguPtJY6bVh3kjDm6iNUdPm3wKed7zpYhuXtP2Qnzyo18pnvgSljz-9r1gzwYak7t-OK_Yt483d7vP1e3XT192728rK1uxVlqVadquV8KSrlVPBDQ0ErBuLYleKtdrQa5ToIVySsK9rfvBNr3UJC3W8oq9OdddYviRXVrN5JN140izCzkZ7BqtW5ByQ1__gx5DjnP5nUGNAjosCysUnikbQ0rRDWaJfirDGQSzZWHOWZiShdmyMLp4Xj1UzveT6x8dfzZfAHEGUpHmvYt_tf5v1V8EopPr</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1912081112</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Diagnostic yield of CT urography in the evaluation of hematuria in young patients in a military population</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings</source><creator>Mace, Laura R. ; Galloway, Terrel L. ; Ma, Andrew ; Montgomery, Richard S. ; Rockhill, Ryan C. ; Reynolds, William W. ; Marks, Robert M.</creator><creatorcontrib>Mace, Laura R. ; Galloway, Terrel L. ; Ma, Andrew ; Montgomery, Richard S. ; Rockhill, Ryan C. ; Reynolds, William W. ; Marks, Robert M.</creatorcontrib><description>Purpose To assess the diagnostic yield of a computed tomography urography (CTU) study in patients less than 50 years of age, who have a history of military service, and who are at increased risk of urological cancers secondary to harmful practices and work-related exposures. Methods 137 Consecutive patients who underwent CTU between 2012 and 2013 for new onset of hematuria were included. Initial review of the clinical interpretations of the CTU studies grouped the studies into negative and positive exams for any urological findings. Review of the patients’ medical records and subsequent radiology studies determined microscopic versus gross hematuria at presentation and any findings after their CTU study consistent with a urological malignancy. The positive exams were reviewed by second readers, blinded to the clinical interpretation of the initial CTU studies, who first read the unenhanced images. The readers characterized findings as visible on non-contrast CT alone or they requested contrast-enhanced images. Each urological finding was recorded for each patient. Results Of the 137 included patients, 84 had micro-hematuria and 53 had gross hematuria. There were a total of 99 negative examinations of the 137 included patients. Contrast was requested 14 times to confirm 11 benign cysts. No findings concerning for malignancy were found by the readers or on subsequent record reviews for each patient. Conclusion An unenhanced CT may be appropriate to evaluate new onset microscopic, and possibly gross hematuria, in patients younger than 40, even in patients at increased risk of urologic cancer.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2366-004X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2366-0058</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s00261-017-1084-9</identifier><identifier>PMID: 28213826</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New York: Springer US</publisher><subject>Adult ; Age ; Benign ; Cancer ; Computed tomography ; Contrast Media ; Cysts ; Diagnostic systems ; Female ; Gastroenterology ; Health risks ; Hematuria ; Hematuria - diagnostic imaging ; Hepatology ; Humans ; Image contrast ; Image enhancement ; Imaging ; Male ; Malignancy ; Medical diagnosis ; Medical records ; Medicine ; Medicine &amp; Public Health ; Middle Aged ; Military ; Military Personnel ; Occupational Exposure - adverse effects ; Patients ; Radiology ; Readers ; Retrospective Studies ; Risk ; Risk Factors ; Tomography, X-Ray Computed - methods ; Urography ; Young adults</subject><ispartof>Abdominal imaging, 2017-07, Vol.42 (7), p.1906-1910</ispartof><rights>Springer Science+Business Media New York (outside the USA) 2017</rights><rights>Abdominal Radiology is a copyright of Springer, 2017.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c372t-9508478d52ca945daa0af630147ca2d35ed92ae850925e530bc4dfc6d39a3c143</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c372t-9508478d52ca945daa0af630147ca2d35ed92ae850925e530bc4dfc6d39a3c143</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-1463-718X</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s00261-017-1084-9$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1007/s00261-017-1084-9$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925,41488,42557,51319</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28213826$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Mace, Laura R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Galloway, Terrel L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ma, Andrew</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Montgomery, Richard S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rockhill, Ryan C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Reynolds, William W.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Marks, Robert M.</creatorcontrib><title>Diagnostic yield of CT urography in the evaluation of hematuria in young patients in a military population</title><title>Abdominal imaging</title><addtitle>Abdom Radiol</addtitle><addtitle>Abdom Radiol (NY)</addtitle><description>Purpose To assess the diagnostic yield of a computed tomography urography (CTU) study in patients less than 50 years of age, who have a history of military service, and who are at increased risk of urological cancers secondary to harmful practices and work-related exposures. Methods 137 Consecutive patients who underwent CTU between 2012 and 2013 for new onset of hematuria were included. Initial review of the clinical interpretations of the CTU studies grouped the studies into negative and positive exams for any urological findings. Review of the patients’ medical records and subsequent radiology studies determined microscopic versus gross hematuria at presentation and any findings after their CTU study consistent with a urological malignancy. The positive exams were reviewed by second readers, blinded to the clinical interpretation of the initial CTU studies, who first read the unenhanced images. The readers characterized findings as visible on non-contrast CT alone or they requested contrast-enhanced images. Each urological finding was recorded for each patient. Results Of the 137 included patients, 84 had micro-hematuria and 53 had gross hematuria. There were a total of 99 negative examinations of the 137 included patients. Contrast was requested 14 times to confirm 11 benign cysts. No findings concerning for malignancy were found by the readers or on subsequent record reviews for each patient. Conclusion An unenhanced CT may be appropriate to evaluate new onset microscopic, and possibly gross hematuria, in patients younger than 40, even in patients at increased risk of urologic cancer.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Age</subject><subject>Benign</subject><subject>Cancer</subject><subject>Computed tomography</subject><subject>Contrast Media</subject><subject>Cysts</subject><subject>Diagnostic systems</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Gastroenterology</subject><subject>Health risks</subject><subject>Hematuria</subject><subject>Hematuria - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Hepatology</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Image contrast</subject><subject>Image enhancement</subject><subject>Imaging</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Malignancy</subject><subject>Medical diagnosis</subject><subject>Medical records</subject><subject>Medicine</subject><subject>Medicine &amp; Public Health</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Military</subject><subject>Military Personnel</subject><subject>Occupational Exposure - adverse effects</subject><subject>Patients</subject><subject>Radiology</subject><subject>Readers</subject><subject>Retrospective Studies</subject><subject>Risk</subject><subject>Risk Factors</subject><subject>Tomography, X-Ray Computed - methods</subject><subject>Urography</subject><subject>Young adults</subject><issn>2366-004X</issn><issn>2366-0058</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2017</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kU9v1DAQxS0EolXpB-CCLHHhEpix4yQ-oqX8kSpxKRI3a-o4u14lcbBjpP32OGypEBInW36_N-OZx9hLhLcI0L5LAKLBCrCtELq60k_YpZBNUwGo7unjvf5-wa5TOgIANgpRqOfsQnQCZSeaS3b84Gk_h7R6y0_ejT0PA9_d8RzDPtJyOHE_8_XguPtJY6bVh3kjDm6iNUdPm3wKed7zpYhuXtP2Qnzyo18pnvgSljz-9r1gzwYak7t-OK_Yt483d7vP1e3XT192728rK1uxVlqVadquV8KSrlVPBDQ0ErBuLYleKtdrQa5ToIVySsK9rfvBNr3UJC3W8oq9OdddYviRXVrN5JN140izCzkZ7BqtW5ByQ1__gx5DjnP5nUGNAjosCysUnikbQ0rRDWaJfirDGQSzZWHOWZiShdmyMLp4Xj1UzveT6x8dfzZfAHEGUpHmvYt_tf5v1V8EopPr</recordid><startdate>20170701</startdate><enddate>20170701</enddate><creator>Mace, Laura R.</creator><creator>Galloway, Terrel L.</creator><creator>Ma, Andrew</creator><creator>Montgomery, Richard S.</creator><creator>Rockhill, Ryan C.</creator><creator>Reynolds, William W.</creator><creator>Marks, Robert M.</creator><general>Springer US</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ARAPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>JQ2</scope><scope>K7-</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>M7Z</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>P5Z</scope><scope>P62</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1463-718X</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20170701</creationdate><title>Diagnostic yield of CT urography in the evaluation of hematuria in young patients in a military population</title><author>Mace, Laura R. ; Galloway, Terrel L. ; Ma, Andrew ; Montgomery, Richard S. ; Rockhill, Ryan C. ; Reynolds, William W. ; Marks, Robert M.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c372t-9508478d52ca945daa0af630147ca2d35ed92ae850925e530bc4dfc6d39a3c143</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2017</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Age</topic><topic>Benign</topic><topic>Cancer</topic><topic>Computed tomography</topic><topic>Contrast Media</topic><topic>Cysts</topic><topic>Diagnostic systems</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Gastroenterology</topic><topic>Health risks</topic><topic>Hematuria</topic><topic>Hematuria - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Hepatology</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Image contrast</topic><topic>Image enhancement</topic><topic>Imaging</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Malignancy</topic><topic>Medical diagnosis</topic><topic>Medical records</topic><topic>Medicine</topic><topic>Medicine &amp; Public Health</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Military</topic><topic>Military Personnel</topic><topic>Occupational Exposure - adverse effects</topic><topic>Patients</topic><topic>Radiology</topic><topic>Readers</topic><topic>Retrospective Studies</topic><topic>Risk</topic><topic>Risk Factors</topic><topic>Tomography, X-Ray Computed - methods</topic><topic>Urography</topic><topic>Young adults</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Mace, Laura R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Galloway, Terrel L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ma, Andrew</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Montgomery, Richard S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rockhill, Ryan C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Reynolds, William W.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Marks, Robert M.</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Database</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies &amp; Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Computer Science Collection</collection><collection>Computer Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Biochemistry Abstracts 1</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies &amp; Aerospace Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Advanced Technologies &amp; Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Abdominal imaging</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Mace, Laura R.</au><au>Galloway, Terrel L.</au><au>Ma, Andrew</au><au>Montgomery, Richard S.</au><au>Rockhill, Ryan C.</au><au>Reynolds, William W.</au><au>Marks, Robert M.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Diagnostic yield of CT urography in the evaluation of hematuria in young patients in a military population</atitle><jtitle>Abdominal imaging</jtitle><stitle>Abdom Radiol</stitle><addtitle>Abdom Radiol (NY)</addtitle><date>2017-07-01</date><risdate>2017</risdate><volume>42</volume><issue>7</issue><spage>1906</spage><epage>1910</epage><pages>1906-1910</pages><issn>2366-004X</issn><eissn>2366-0058</eissn><abstract>Purpose To assess the diagnostic yield of a computed tomography urography (CTU) study in patients less than 50 years of age, who have a history of military service, and who are at increased risk of urological cancers secondary to harmful practices and work-related exposures. Methods 137 Consecutive patients who underwent CTU between 2012 and 2013 for new onset of hematuria were included. Initial review of the clinical interpretations of the CTU studies grouped the studies into negative and positive exams for any urological findings. Review of the patients’ medical records and subsequent radiology studies determined microscopic versus gross hematuria at presentation and any findings after their CTU study consistent with a urological malignancy. The positive exams were reviewed by second readers, blinded to the clinical interpretation of the initial CTU studies, who first read the unenhanced images. The readers characterized findings as visible on non-contrast CT alone or they requested contrast-enhanced images. Each urological finding was recorded for each patient. Results Of the 137 included patients, 84 had micro-hematuria and 53 had gross hematuria. There were a total of 99 negative examinations of the 137 included patients. Contrast was requested 14 times to confirm 11 benign cysts. No findings concerning for malignancy were found by the readers or on subsequent record reviews for each patient. Conclusion An unenhanced CT may be appropriate to evaluate new onset microscopic, and possibly gross hematuria, in patients younger than 40, even in patients at increased risk of urologic cancer.</abstract><cop>New York</cop><pub>Springer US</pub><pmid>28213826</pmid><doi>10.1007/s00261-017-1084-9</doi><tpages>5</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1463-718X</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 2366-004X
ispartof Abdominal imaging, 2017-07, Vol.42 (7), p.1906-1910
issn 2366-004X
2366-0058
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1869970334
source MEDLINE; SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings
subjects Adult
Age
Benign
Cancer
Computed tomography
Contrast Media
Cysts
Diagnostic systems
Female
Gastroenterology
Health risks
Hematuria
Hematuria - diagnostic imaging
Hepatology
Humans
Image contrast
Image enhancement
Imaging
Male
Malignancy
Medical diagnosis
Medical records
Medicine
Medicine & Public Health
Middle Aged
Military
Military Personnel
Occupational Exposure - adverse effects
Patients
Radiology
Readers
Retrospective Studies
Risk
Risk Factors
Tomography, X-Ray Computed - methods
Urography
Young adults
title Diagnostic yield of CT urography in the evaluation of hematuria in young patients in a military population
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-30T23%3A15%3A27IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Diagnostic%20yield%20of%20CT%20urography%20in%20the%20evaluation%20of%20hematuria%20in%20young%20patients%20in%20a%20military%20population&rft.jtitle=Abdominal%20imaging&rft.au=Mace,%20Laura%20R.&rft.date=2017-07-01&rft.volume=42&rft.issue=7&rft.spage=1906&rft.epage=1910&rft.pages=1906-1910&rft.issn=2366-004X&rft.eissn=2366-0058&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s00261-017-1084-9&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1912081112%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1912081112&rft_id=info:pmid/28213826&rfr_iscdi=true