Diagnostic yield of CT urography in the evaluation of hematuria in young patients in a military population
Purpose To assess the diagnostic yield of a computed tomography urography (CTU) study in patients less than 50 years of age, who have a history of military service, and who are at increased risk of urological cancers secondary to harmful practices and work-related exposures. Methods 137 Consecutive...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Abdominal imaging 2017-07, Vol.42 (7), p.1906-1910 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 1910 |
---|---|
container_issue | 7 |
container_start_page | 1906 |
container_title | Abdominal imaging |
container_volume | 42 |
creator | Mace, Laura R. Galloway, Terrel L. Ma, Andrew Montgomery, Richard S. Rockhill, Ryan C. Reynolds, William W. Marks, Robert M. |
description | Purpose
To assess the diagnostic yield of a computed tomography urography (CTU) study in patients less than 50 years of age, who have a history of military service, and who are at increased risk of urological cancers secondary to harmful practices and work-related exposures.
Methods
137 Consecutive patients who underwent CTU between 2012 and 2013 for new onset of hematuria were included. Initial review of the clinical interpretations of the CTU studies grouped the studies into negative and positive exams for any urological findings. Review of the patients’ medical records and subsequent radiology studies determined microscopic versus gross hematuria at presentation and any findings after their CTU study consistent with a urological malignancy. The positive exams were reviewed by second readers, blinded to the clinical interpretation of the initial CTU studies, who first read the unenhanced images. The readers characterized findings as visible on non-contrast CT alone or they requested contrast-enhanced images. Each urological finding was recorded for each patient.
Results
Of the 137 included patients, 84 had micro-hematuria and 53 had gross hematuria. There were a total of 99 negative examinations of the 137 included patients. Contrast was requested 14 times to confirm 11 benign cysts. No findings concerning for malignancy were found by the readers or on subsequent record reviews for each patient.
Conclusion
An unenhanced CT may be appropriate to evaluate new onset microscopic, and possibly gross hematuria, in patients younger than 40, even in patients at increased risk of urologic cancer. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1007/s00261-017-1084-9 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1869970334</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1912081112</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c372t-9508478d52ca945daa0af630147ca2d35ed92ae850925e530bc4dfc6d39a3c143</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kU9v1DAQxS0EolXpB-CCLHHhEpix4yQ-oqX8kSpxKRI3a-o4u14lcbBjpP32OGypEBInW36_N-OZx9hLhLcI0L5LAKLBCrCtELq60k_YpZBNUwGo7unjvf5-wa5TOgIANgpRqOfsQnQCZSeaS3b84Gk_h7R6y0_ejT0PA9_d8RzDPtJyOHE_8_XguPtJY6bVh3kjDm6iNUdPm3wKed7zpYhuXtP2Qnzyo18pnvgSljz-9r1gzwYak7t-OK_Yt483d7vP1e3XT192728rK1uxVlqVadquV8KSrlVPBDQ0ErBuLYleKtdrQa5ToIVySsK9rfvBNr3UJC3W8oq9OdddYviRXVrN5JN140izCzkZ7BqtW5ByQ1__gx5DjnP5nUGNAjosCysUnikbQ0rRDWaJfirDGQSzZWHOWZiShdmyMLp4Xj1UzveT6x8dfzZfAHEGUpHmvYt_tf5v1V8EopPr</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1912081112</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Diagnostic yield of CT urography in the evaluation of hematuria in young patients in a military population</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings</source><creator>Mace, Laura R. ; Galloway, Terrel L. ; Ma, Andrew ; Montgomery, Richard S. ; Rockhill, Ryan C. ; Reynolds, William W. ; Marks, Robert M.</creator><creatorcontrib>Mace, Laura R. ; Galloway, Terrel L. ; Ma, Andrew ; Montgomery, Richard S. ; Rockhill, Ryan C. ; Reynolds, William W. ; Marks, Robert M.</creatorcontrib><description>Purpose
To assess the diagnostic yield of a computed tomography urography (CTU) study in patients less than 50 years of age, who have a history of military service, and who are at increased risk of urological cancers secondary to harmful practices and work-related exposures.
Methods
137 Consecutive patients who underwent CTU between 2012 and 2013 for new onset of hematuria were included. Initial review of the clinical interpretations of the CTU studies grouped the studies into negative and positive exams for any urological findings. Review of the patients’ medical records and subsequent radiology studies determined microscopic versus gross hematuria at presentation and any findings after their CTU study consistent with a urological malignancy. The positive exams were reviewed by second readers, blinded to the clinical interpretation of the initial CTU studies, who first read the unenhanced images. The readers characterized findings as visible on non-contrast CT alone or they requested contrast-enhanced images. Each urological finding was recorded for each patient.
Results
Of the 137 included patients, 84 had micro-hematuria and 53 had gross hematuria. There were a total of 99 negative examinations of the 137 included patients. Contrast was requested 14 times to confirm 11 benign cysts. No findings concerning for malignancy were found by the readers or on subsequent record reviews for each patient.
Conclusion
An unenhanced CT may be appropriate to evaluate new onset microscopic, and possibly gross hematuria, in patients younger than 40, even in patients at increased risk of urologic cancer.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2366-004X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2366-0058</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s00261-017-1084-9</identifier><identifier>PMID: 28213826</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New York: Springer US</publisher><subject>Adult ; Age ; Benign ; Cancer ; Computed tomography ; Contrast Media ; Cysts ; Diagnostic systems ; Female ; Gastroenterology ; Health risks ; Hematuria ; Hematuria - diagnostic imaging ; Hepatology ; Humans ; Image contrast ; Image enhancement ; Imaging ; Male ; Malignancy ; Medical diagnosis ; Medical records ; Medicine ; Medicine & Public Health ; Middle Aged ; Military ; Military Personnel ; Occupational Exposure - adverse effects ; Patients ; Radiology ; Readers ; Retrospective Studies ; Risk ; Risk Factors ; Tomography, X-Ray Computed - methods ; Urography ; Young adults</subject><ispartof>Abdominal imaging, 2017-07, Vol.42 (7), p.1906-1910</ispartof><rights>Springer Science+Business Media New York (outside the USA) 2017</rights><rights>Abdominal Radiology is a copyright of Springer, 2017.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c372t-9508478d52ca945daa0af630147ca2d35ed92ae850925e530bc4dfc6d39a3c143</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c372t-9508478d52ca945daa0af630147ca2d35ed92ae850925e530bc4dfc6d39a3c143</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-1463-718X</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s00261-017-1084-9$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1007/s00261-017-1084-9$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925,41488,42557,51319</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28213826$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Mace, Laura R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Galloway, Terrel L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ma, Andrew</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Montgomery, Richard S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rockhill, Ryan C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Reynolds, William W.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Marks, Robert M.</creatorcontrib><title>Diagnostic yield of CT urography in the evaluation of hematuria in young patients in a military population</title><title>Abdominal imaging</title><addtitle>Abdom Radiol</addtitle><addtitle>Abdom Radiol (NY)</addtitle><description>Purpose
To assess the diagnostic yield of a computed tomography urography (CTU) study in patients less than 50 years of age, who have a history of military service, and who are at increased risk of urological cancers secondary to harmful practices and work-related exposures.
Methods
137 Consecutive patients who underwent CTU between 2012 and 2013 for new onset of hematuria were included. Initial review of the clinical interpretations of the CTU studies grouped the studies into negative and positive exams for any urological findings. Review of the patients’ medical records and subsequent radiology studies determined microscopic versus gross hematuria at presentation and any findings after their CTU study consistent with a urological malignancy. The positive exams were reviewed by second readers, blinded to the clinical interpretation of the initial CTU studies, who first read the unenhanced images. The readers characterized findings as visible on non-contrast CT alone or they requested contrast-enhanced images. Each urological finding was recorded for each patient.
Results
Of the 137 included patients, 84 had micro-hematuria and 53 had gross hematuria. There were a total of 99 negative examinations of the 137 included patients. Contrast was requested 14 times to confirm 11 benign cysts. No findings concerning for malignancy were found by the readers or on subsequent record reviews for each patient.
Conclusion
An unenhanced CT may be appropriate to evaluate new onset microscopic, and possibly gross hematuria, in patients younger than 40, even in patients at increased risk of urologic cancer.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Age</subject><subject>Benign</subject><subject>Cancer</subject><subject>Computed tomography</subject><subject>Contrast Media</subject><subject>Cysts</subject><subject>Diagnostic systems</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Gastroenterology</subject><subject>Health risks</subject><subject>Hematuria</subject><subject>Hematuria - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Hepatology</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Image contrast</subject><subject>Image enhancement</subject><subject>Imaging</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Malignancy</subject><subject>Medical diagnosis</subject><subject>Medical records</subject><subject>Medicine</subject><subject>Medicine & Public Health</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Military</subject><subject>Military Personnel</subject><subject>Occupational Exposure - adverse effects</subject><subject>Patients</subject><subject>Radiology</subject><subject>Readers</subject><subject>Retrospective Studies</subject><subject>Risk</subject><subject>Risk Factors</subject><subject>Tomography, X-Ray Computed - methods</subject><subject>Urography</subject><subject>Young adults</subject><issn>2366-004X</issn><issn>2366-0058</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2017</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kU9v1DAQxS0EolXpB-CCLHHhEpix4yQ-oqX8kSpxKRI3a-o4u14lcbBjpP32OGypEBInW36_N-OZx9hLhLcI0L5LAKLBCrCtELq60k_YpZBNUwGo7unjvf5-wa5TOgIANgpRqOfsQnQCZSeaS3b84Gk_h7R6y0_ejT0PA9_d8RzDPtJyOHE_8_XguPtJY6bVh3kjDm6iNUdPm3wKed7zpYhuXtP2Qnzyo18pnvgSljz-9r1gzwYak7t-OK_Yt483d7vP1e3XT192728rK1uxVlqVadquV8KSrlVPBDQ0ErBuLYleKtdrQa5ToIVySsK9rfvBNr3UJC3W8oq9OdddYviRXVrN5JN140izCzkZ7BqtW5ByQ1__gx5DjnP5nUGNAjosCysUnikbQ0rRDWaJfirDGQSzZWHOWZiShdmyMLp4Xj1UzveT6x8dfzZfAHEGUpHmvYt_tf5v1V8EopPr</recordid><startdate>20170701</startdate><enddate>20170701</enddate><creator>Mace, Laura R.</creator><creator>Galloway, Terrel L.</creator><creator>Ma, Andrew</creator><creator>Montgomery, Richard S.</creator><creator>Rockhill, Ryan C.</creator><creator>Reynolds, William W.</creator><creator>Marks, Robert M.</creator><general>Springer US</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ARAPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>JQ2</scope><scope>K7-</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>M7Z</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>P5Z</scope><scope>P62</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1463-718X</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20170701</creationdate><title>Diagnostic yield of CT urography in the evaluation of hematuria in young patients in a military population</title><author>Mace, Laura R. ; Galloway, Terrel L. ; Ma, Andrew ; Montgomery, Richard S. ; Rockhill, Ryan C. ; Reynolds, William W. ; Marks, Robert M.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c372t-9508478d52ca945daa0af630147ca2d35ed92ae850925e530bc4dfc6d39a3c143</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2017</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Age</topic><topic>Benign</topic><topic>Cancer</topic><topic>Computed tomography</topic><topic>Contrast Media</topic><topic>Cysts</topic><topic>Diagnostic systems</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Gastroenterology</topic><topic>Health risks</topic><topic>Hematuria</topic><topic>Hematuria - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Hepatology</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Image contrast</topic><topic>Image enhancement</topic><topic>Imaging</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Malignancy</topic><topic>Medical diagnosis</topic><topic>Medical records</topic><topic>Medicine</topic><topic>Medicine & Public Health</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Military</topic><topic>Military Personnel</topic><topic>Occupational Exposure - adverse effects</topic><topic>Patients</topic><topic>Radiology</topic><topic>Readers</topic><topic>Retrospective Studies</topic><topic>Risk</topic><topic>Risk Factors</topic><topic>Tomography, X-Ray Computed - methods</topic><topic>Urography</topic><topic>Young adults</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Mace, Laura R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Galloway, Terrel L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ma, Andrew</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Montgomery, Richard S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rockhill, Ryan C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Reynolds, William W.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Marks, Robert M.</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Computer Science Collection</collection><collection>Computer Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Biochemistry Abstracts 1</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Abdominal imaging</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Mace, Laura R.</au><au>Galloway, Terrel L.</au><au>Ma, Andrew</au><au>Montgomery, Richard S.</au><au>Rockhill, Ryan C.</au><au>Reynolds, William W.</au><au>Marks, Robert M.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Diagnostic yield of CT urography in the evaluation of hematuria in young patients in a military population</atitle><jtitle>Abdominal imaging</jtitle><stitle>Abdom Radiol</stitle><addtitle>Abdom Radiol (NY)</addtitle><date>2017-07-01</date><risdate>2017</risdate><volume>42</volume><issue>7</issue><spage>1906</spage><epage>1910</epage><pages>1906-1910</pages><issn>2366-004X</issn><eissn>2366-0058</eissn><abstract>Purpose
To assess the diagnostic yield of a computed tomography urography (CTU) study in patients less than 50 years of age, who have a history of military service, and who are at increased risk of urological cancers secondary to harmful practices and work-related exposures.
Methods
137 Consecutive patients who underwent CTU between 2012 and 2013 for new onset of hematuria were included. Initial review of the clinical interpretations of the CTU studies grouped the studies into negative and positive exams for any urological findings. Review of the patients’ medical records and subsequent radiology studies determined microscopic versus gross hematuria at presentation and any findings after their CTU study consistent with a urological malignancy. The positive exams were reviewed by second readers, blinded to the clinical interpretation of the initial CTU studies, who first read the unenhanced images. The readers characterized findings as visible on non-contrast CT alone or they requested contrast-enhanced images. Each urological finding was recorded for each patient.
Results
Of the 137 included patients, 84 had micro-hematuria and 53 had gross hematuria. There were a total of 99 negative examinations of the 137 included patients. Contrast was requested 14 times to confirm 11 benign cysts. No findings concerning for malignancy were found by the readers or on subsequent record reviews for each patient.
Conclusion
An unenhanced CT may be appropriate to evaluate new onset microscopic, and possibly gross hematuria, in patients younger than 40, even in patients at increased risk of urologic cancer.</abstract><cop>New York</cop><pub>Springer US</pub><pmid>28213826</pmid><doi>10.1007/s00261-017-1084-9</doi><tpages>5</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1463-718X</orcidid></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 2366-004X |
ispartof | Abdominal imaging, 2017-07, Vol.42 (7), p.1906-1910 |
issn | 2366-004X 2366-0058 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1869970334 |
source | MEDLINE; SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings |
subjects | Adult Age Benign Cancer Computed tomography Contrast Media Cysts Diagnostic systems Female Gastroenterology Health risks Hematuria Hematuria - diagnostic imaging Hepatology Humans Image contrast Image enhancement Imaging Male Malignancy Medical diagnosis Medical records Medicine Medicine & Public Health Middle Aged Military Military Personnel Occupational Exposure - adverse effects Patients Radiology Readers Retrospective Studies Risk Risk Factors Tomography, X-Ray Computed - methods Urography Young adults |
title | Diagnostic yield of CT urography in the evaluation of hematuria in young patients in a military population |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-30T23%3A15%3A27IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Diagnostic%20yield%20of%20CT%20urography%20in%20the%20evaluation%20of%20hematuria%20in%20young%20patients%20in%20a%20military%20population&rft.jtitle=Abdominal%20imaging&rft.au=Mace,%20Laura%20R.&rft.date=2017-07-01&rft.volume=42&rft.issue=7&rft.spage=1906&rft.epage=1910&rft.pages=1906-1910&rft.issn=2366-004X&rft.eissn=2366-0058&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s00261-017-1084-9&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1912081112%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1912081112&rft_id=info:pmid/28213826&rfr_iscdi=true |